BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to sizing paper and the application of a release coating
to a paper substrate, a nonwoven substrate, or a woven substrate.
2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
A. Saturant Technology
[0002] In the manufacture of paper and paperboard from cellulosic material, it is customary
to use a sizing agent either at the wet end, known as "internal sizing", or in the
drying section of the paper making machine. This is done to increase the resistance
of the paper or paperboard to wetting and penetration by liquids, particularly aqueous
liquids, and thereby provides the paper product with water resistant properties.
[0003] The term "paper" as used in this invention refers to a web of felted or matted sheets
of nonwoven cellulose fibers, formed on a fine wire screen from a dilute water suspension,
and bonded together as the water is removed and the sheet is dried. Paper also refers
to sheet materials produced from other types of fibers, particularly mineral or synthetic,
which can be formed and bonded by other means. Of particular importance in the present
invention, is the unbleached kraft paper commonly used in the manufacture of masking
tapes and packaging tapes. Also of importance are nonwoven fiber or woven fiber substrates
from synthetic or natural sources, such as nylon, rayon, cellulose diacetate, cellulose
triacetate, polyamide resins, polyester resins, polyacrylic resins, polyvinyl resins,
polyolefin resins, glass, metal, abaca, sisal, henequen jute, cotton, ramie, flax,
hemp, silk, wool, mohair, cashmere, vicuna, alpaca, and the like.
[0004] The process of saturating or impregnating paper or a nonwoven fiber substrate with
a resin or polymer is also known in the trade as sizing.
[0005] The application of a sizing agent to paper sheet or paperboard in the drying section
of the papermaking machine is generally referred to as tub sizing. Partially dry sheet
is passed through a size solution or over a roll wetted with size solution to saturate
the paper. The same procedure can be applied to a nonwoven substrate but not generally
to a woven substrate, which ordinarily has sufficient strength.
[0006] The two principal methods of sizing paper are the tub sizing method and off-machine
saturation method. In tub sizing, the paper is contacted with the size while still
on the paper machine and in a partially dry state. A relatively small percentage of
manufactured paper is saturated by this method.
[0007] Where paper is used to make adhesive coated tapes, such as masking tapes or packaging
tapes, it is necessary to improve its tensile strength and tear resistance by impregnating
the paper with a resin or polymer to confer these properties. Also improved is delamination
resistance, whereby the tendency to split in the plane of the paper is reduced.
[0008] When paper in the form of tape is coated with a pressure sensitive adhesive and the
adhesive coated tape is wound upon itself to form a roll, as for example with masking
tape or packing tape, it is also necessary to apply to the non-adhesive coated side
of the tape, a controlled release coating, also known as "backsize" in order to faciliate
the unwinding of the tape from the roll and its use.
[0009] If the tape cannot be unwound, or unwound only with great difficulty, it is said
to be "blocking". Optimally, the tape must unwind in a controlled fashion so that
only the amount desired for use is unwound from the roll. The tape should not be capable
of unwinding in an uncontrolled manner when handled, so that more tape separates from
the roll than the amount desired.
[0010] Suitable adhesives for pressure sensitive adhesive tape applications include tackified
rubber adhesive solutions, tackified hot melt adhesives, tackified rubber emulsion
adhesives and acrylic ester adhesives.
[0011] The majority of manufactured paper is saturated with a sizing composition, known
as a "saturant", by means of an off-machine saturation method wherein the paper is
saturated on a separate machine and is dry at the time of saturation. The conventional
means for saturating paper in the off-machine method is to dip the paper in a dilute
latex or resin emulsion, and then pass the paper between nip rollers under high pressure
to remove excess resin or saturant. The paper is then passed through an oven to dry
and set the resin.
[0012] The primary disadvantage of the conventional off-machine saturation method wherein
the paper is dipped, and the excess resin is squeezed, lies in the large amount of
water which becomes absorbed by the paper. For example, in the saturation of bleached
crepe paper, used to produce masking tape, a normal dry add-on of styrene-butadiene-rubber
(SBR) latex to achieve acceptable tensile and delamination properties is generally
about 10 to 50% by weight of the dry paper.
[0013] In order not to exceed this add-on, the latex is usually applied from a dip bath
having a solids level of about 25 to 30%. Wet pick-ups from a bath such as this range
from about 75 to 150%. "Wet pick-up" refers to the weight of the added substance plus
the vehicle, the weight of the web as a basis. Styrene-butadiene-rubber latices are
manufactured at about 50 to 55% solids. It thus becomes necessary to dilute the latex
with water in order to avoid adding more rubber solids to the paper than is necessary
to achieve the desired tensile strength.
[0014] All water added must then be removed in drying ovens. Obviously, a significant amount
of the energy expended in drying could be conserved if it were not necessary to dilute
the latex with water. In addition, the running speed of a saturation range is generally
controlled by the drying capacity of the ovens.
B. Release Coatings
[0015] When the sized paper is used to produce adhesive coated tapes, a controlled release
coating, referred to as "backsize" is generally applied to the surface of the dry,
saturated paper stock by coating a low solids polymer solution, such as that of acrylic
ester copolymer resins, vinyl acetate copolymer resins, silicone resins, polyamide
resins and polyester resins by conventional coating methods such as a kiss roll or
a wire wound roll.
[0016] Historically, non-aqueous solvent solutions were generally used. However, due to
environmental considerations, aqueous emulsions or latices have recently been introduced
with much success, displacing the use of non-aqueous solvent solutions.
[0017] Controlled release latices are available at a level of about 40 to 50% solids, and
are diluted with water to about 10 to 30% solids in order to meter the application
of the release coating so that only a sufficient amount is used to achieve the desired
release properties.
[0018] Unlike the saturant which must penetrate wetted paper, the controlled release coating
is applied only on the surface of one side of the paper.
[0019] Silicone emulsions are also used for controlled release coatings, and are applied
from emulsions containing about 2 to 10% silicone solids, since only small amounts
of silicone are necessary to achieve the desired release properties.
[0020] As with the saturant, the ability to apply the release coating to the paper surface
or other substrate using a high solids content emulsion would result in energy saving
benefits in the dryer provided that the wet pickup is proportionately lower.
[0021] U.S. Patent 4,571,360 to Brown et al discloses uniformly distributing paper treating
agents onto paper without changing the properties of the paper by applying fast breaking
and fast wetting foams. Ionic foaming agents were added to distribute the treating
agent evenly to the paper. In all the examples starch was the treating agent. Foam
may be applied to either side of the paper in multiple or two-sided applications,
or sequentially.
[0022] U.S. Patent 4,581,254 to Cunningham et al discloses applicators for uniformly distributing
treating agents, such as cooked starch, to rapidly moving paper.
[0023] U.S. Patent 4,597,831 to Anderson discloses application of water-repelling, external
sizing such as rosin to the surface of paper. The rosin used was self-foaming and
the use of foaming agents was discouraged.
[0024] U.S. Patent 4,184,914 to Jenkins discloses the use of a foamed protein added to paper
pulp before its entrance to the mesh of a papermaking machine in order to reduce the
amount of water picked up by the pulp. The protein foaming agent also reduces the
surface tension of the water.
[0025] The brochure "Foam Bonding - Dewtex" published by Rando Machine Corporation, Macedon,
New York discloses foam bonding of fabrics employing foamed synthetic rubber and polyvinyl
acetate latices as adhesives.
[0026] U.S. Patent 4,279,964 to Heller discloses densification of a high solids froth of
a resin emulsion and a starch solution, or a frothed starch solution coated onto a
paper substrate to increase its opacity and ink hold out.
[0027] U.S. Patent 4,288,475 to Meeker teaches vacuum impregnation of a fibrous web by a
foamed binder consisting of up to 60% of the weight of the material.
[0028] U.S. Patent Nos. 4,193,762 to Namboodri; 4,118,526 to Gregorian et al; 4,094,913
to Walter et al and the text of a presentation by George C. Kantner, "Frothed and
Foam Coatings for Upholstery and Nonwoven Fabric Applications" FOAM TECHNOLOGY IN
TEXTILE PROCESSESS, (PD 186-03, July 30-31, 1985), all relate to treating fabrics
with a foam composition.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0029] The present invention relates to the application of a foam release coating to paper
and other substrates. It also relates to the sequential application of a foamed saturant
and of a foamed release coating to an appropriate substrate without an intermediate
drying step.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0030] In the accompanying drawings,
Figure 1 is a schematic drawing of a coating apparatus;
Figure 2 is a schematic drawing of a floating knife arrangement;
Figure 3 is a schematic drawing of foam application by means of a kiss roller;
Figure 4 is a schematic drawing of sequential application of a foamed saturant and
a foamed release coating without an intermediate drying step.
[0031] Corresponding reference numbers indicate corresponding parts throughout the figures
of drawings.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0032] In accordance with the present invention, a release coating in the form of a foam
is applied to paper or other substrate, such as woven or nonwoven fibers from natural
or synthetic sources. The use of the release coating in the form of a foam reduces
the amount of water that is necessary in the conventional manner of applying a release
coating by aqueous dilution.
[0033] A high solids latex release coating can be converted to a foam by injecting air into
the compounded latex in a mechanical foam generator. The viscous foam that is formed
acts as a carrier for the release coating composition which can be contacted to the
paper substrate by means of a variety of coating technologies known in the art.
[0034] The controlled release coating is also referred to by those skilled in the art as
"backsize". Typical controlled release coatings include acrylic ester copolymer latices,
vinyl acetate copolymer latices and silicone emulsions.
[0035] Suitable vinyl acetate copolymers include Valcoat-155™ manufactured by Valchem corporation,
5649™ manufactured by National Starch and Chemical Corporation and Sunaryl SM-3™ manufacured
by Sun Chemical Corporation. Suitable acrylic ester copolymer latexes include Valcoat-182™
manufactured by Valchem Corporation and R225™ manufactured by Rohm and Haas Corporation.
Suitable silicone emulsions include GE2145/GE2156, a two part system manufactured
by General Electric Corporation, and DC1171/DC1171A, a two part system manufactured
by Dow Corning Corporation.
[0036] The ability to convert silicone emulsion release coatings into a foam was unexpected
and surprising due to the fact that silicones are generally resistant to foaming,
and are commonly used as a major ingredient in anti-foam compositions.
[0037] The foamed release coating can be applied to a dry resin saturated paper. The resin
saturated paper can be previously saturated by either conventional wet or foamed application
of the saturant.
[0038] Typical saturants include natural rubber latices, styrene-butadiene emulsion polymers,
polyacrylic ester emulsions, polyvinyl acetate emulsions, polyurethane emulsions and
mixtures thereof. Solvent based saturants can also be used but are being phased out
for commercial applications due to environmental considerations.
[0039] Suitable means for applying the foamed saturant composition to a fibrous substrate
include horizontal pad roll applicators, such as the Reed-Chatwood and Dewtex; slot
die foam applicators, such as the Gaston County and rotary screen applicators, such
as the Stork Brabant RSF.
[0040] Suitable means for applying the foamed release composition to a fibrous substrate
include floating knife applicators, kiss roll applicators, and slot die foam applicators,
such as the Gaston County.
[0041] When the foam release coating is applied to a dry resin saturated paper, the nature
of the saturant and mode of saturation is irrelevant. However, where sequential application
of foamed saturant and foamed release coating is carried out without an intermediate
drying step, it is preferred that both saturant and release coating be composed of
water based systems.
[0042] Most emulsion polymers in the trade contain defoamers. This is because in conventional
wet applications, foaming can cause variations in the amount of emulsion polymer added
to the web. It is preferred that the latexes used in the present invention contain
no defoamer.
[0043] The foamed saturant and foamed controlled release coating can be applied to the paper
web or other substrate sequentially with an intermediate drying step. An intermediate
drying step between the application of the saturant and the application of the controlled
release coating is necessary in conventional aqueous dilution processes. However,
in another embodiment of the present invention, the use of foam allows for the sequential
application of saturant and release coating without an intermediate drying step.
[0044] In a further embodiment of the invention, the release coating can be applied to the
paper web or other substrate in an unfoamed state subsequent to the application of
the foamed saturant, without an intermediate drying step.
[0045] The elimination of the intermediate drying step cannot be accomplished in conventional
aqueous dilution saturation and release coating applications because the high water
content of the paper web after saturation would allow resin particles to migrate into
the wet release coating, which would ruin its release properties, and it would be
difficult to control wet pick-up on an already water saturated web.
[0046] After the release coating composition has been applied to the paper web or other
substrate, it can be dried in suitable drying equipment known to the art. The drying
temperatures can vary from about 150 to 450°F, preferably about 200 to 350°F. Suitable
drying means include gas fired ovens, steam heated cans, and the like.
[0047] In designing foamable systems, the selection of foaming aids and foam stabilizers
is important to the successful operation and application of the foamed saturant and
foamed release coating. Selection is critical so that the foaming aid does not adversely
affect the desired properties of the treated paper. For example, certain foaming agents
and saturants can make the paper hydrophilic, which defeats the purpose of imparting
water resistance. With regard to the release coating, improperly selected foaming
agents can adversely affect the release properties and cause the adhesive coated paper
on an adhesive tape to block. Blocking occurs when a roll of adhesive tape cannot
be unwound. The foaming agent can also migrate from the release coating into the adhesive
layer, causing detackification.
[0048] Additives must be selected which will not interfere with the release properties of
the controlled release coating, or detackify the subsequently coated pressure sensitive
adhesive.
[0049] Moreover, if the foam collapses prematurely, the paper web would absorb an excessive
amount of liquid. Alternatively, if the foam is too stable, the saturant will not
completely penetrate the web and the paper will lack delamination resistance. As already
noted, the foamable saturant is designed to penetrate the paper web whereas the foamable
release coating is contacted to the paper web in a manner such that it exists primarily
on its surface.
[0050] Typical foaming agents include sodium lauryl sulfate, ammonium stearate, fatty acid
diethanolamide, and ethoxylated fatty acids. The amount of foaming agent can vary
from about 0.02 to 5%, and preferably about 0.05 to 2% by weight of the saturant or
release composition. As a general rule, the least amount of foaming agent necessary
to provide a foam of the desired stability is used since foaming agents can, if used
in excess, adversely effect water resistance and release properties of the final saturated
and release coated substrate.
[0051] Optionally, foam stabilizers are employed to increase the stability of the foam.
In the present invention, foam must be sufficiently stable so that it will not collapse
unless an external force such as compression or a vacuum is applied to the foam. Typical
stabilizers for the foam include hydroxyethyl cellulose, ammonium polyacrylate, methoxyethyl
cellulose, and hydroxypropyl cellulose.
[0052] The foams used in this invention contain gas and the foamable saturant, or the controlled
release coating. The gas which comprises the vapor component of the foam can be any
gasous material capable of forming a foam with the saturant or release composition.
Typical suitable gases include, air, nitrogen, oxygen and inert gases, with air being
the preferred foaming gas.
[0053] In making the foams, the vol ume ratio of gas to liquid is known as the "blow ratio".
Thus, a foam using air as the gas and having a blow ratio of 15 consists of 14 parts
of air and 1 part of the liquid treating composition. Generally, the blow ratio is
determined by dividing the weight of a given volume of unfoamed liquid by the weight
of an equal volume of the foam.
[0054] The selection of blow ratio is dictated by the nature of the paper web or other substrate,
and whether saturation or a surface release coating is desired, and by the coating
speed. For paper saturation, the blow ratio generally ranges from about 1.5 to about
25, preferably from about 5 to 15. For a controlled release coating composition, the
blow ratio can range from about 5 to about 30, preferably from about 5 to 20. Where
both the saturant and the release coating are to be applied as foams sequentially,
the saturant is applied first, and for any given paper web or other substrate, the
preferred blow ratio of the saturant will be lower than that for the release coating.
[0055] The foam compositions of the present invention require an external force, such as
mechanical compression or vacuum in order to collapse. This is in contrast to the
fast-breaking foams disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,571,360 to Brown which collapse
merely on contacting a substrate.
[0056] The saturant composition, after collapse of the foam is fast wetting, that is, after
the foam collapses, the saturant is rapidly absorbed into the surface, and penetrates
and impregnates the paper web or other substrate, evenly distributing itself throughout.
[0057] The foamed release coating composition after collapse by external force such as mechanical
compression or vacuum, is preferably not fast-wetting so that the coating remains
on the surface of the web or substrate.
[0058] As noted, foams can be generated by injecting air and the compounded liquid treating
composition into a mechanical foam generator available commercially, such as the known
static, radial or axial types. Foam generation means generally consist of a mechanical
agitator capable of mixing metered quantities of gas and liquid treating compositions.
[0059] The foaming is controlled by adjusting the blow ratio and the rotation rate of the
rotor in the foaming apparatus to provide a foam having the desired bubble size and
half life. The relative feed rates of the liquid treating composition in the gas will
determine the density of the foam.
[0060] Suitable foamers include the Texacote™ foamer (U.S. Rubber and Textile Company, Dalton,
Georgia), and the Oakes™ foamer (Oakes Machinery Corporation, Long Island, NY). Static
foamers can also be used such as the Valfoamer™ (Southern Machine and Sales Company,
Inc., Cheraw, SC). On a laboratory scale, common household mixers, such as the Kitchenaid™
mixer (Hobart Corp., Troy, OH), and other household mixers made by Oster Co., Hamilton
Beach Co., and Waring Co., can also be used, equipped with a wire whip to produce
the foam.
[0061] One method for applying the saturant is to use a coating operation shown schematically
in Fig. 1, wherein air and the saturant composition are (1) foamed in a mechanical
foaming device (2) which produces the foamed saturant composition (3) which passes
through foamed delivery pipe (4) and divides into distribution points (5) and (6),
which release foam onto horizontal padder rolls (7) and (8). The paper web (10) unwinds
from letoff roll (12) and passes over idler roller (14) where it continues its passage
through horizontal padder rolls (7) and (8) and contacts the foamed saturant (3) being
released from foam distributors (5) and (6) in the nip roll section (16) wherein the
foamed saturant (3) is compressed and collapses into the liquid state and penetrates
the paper web (10) from both sides of the paper. Optional movable gates (18) and (20)
restrict the contact time between the foam and the paper web (10), and if necessary
can be adjusted to block the foam entirely from contacting the paper web (10). The
compression pressure on the paper web (10) exerted by the nip rolls (16) of the horizontal
padder rolls (7) and (8) is adjusted to meter the desired amount of foam so that no
excess liquid formed after the collapse of the foamed saturant exists after compression.
The paper web (10) then continues its passage over idler roller (22) through dryer
(24) and onto takeup roll (26). The foamable saturant (3) is formulated so that the
foam is sufficiently stable to be delivered to the horizontal padder rolls (7) and
(8) without collapsing. However, the foamed saturant instanteously collapses into
a liquid when subjected to the pressure applied in the nip roll section (16).
[0062] The examples which follow illustrate specific embodiments of the present invention.
All parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated. Examples 1 to
3 demonstrate foam saturation of a paper substrate. Examples 4 to 7 demonstrate foam
application of a release coating. Example 8 shows the sequential application of a
foamable saturant and a release coating without an intermediate drying step, and Example
9 shows a foamed silicone release coating.
Example 1
[0063] A foamable paper saturant formulation was prepared by mixing 100 parts of a 60:40
styrene-butadiene-rubber (SBR) latex, 55% solids, defoamer free (Walsh Chemical Co.,
Morganton NC); 2 parts ethoxylated fatty alcohol sold under the name Valdet™-4016,
(Valchem Chemical Co., Langley, S.C.) and 1 part hydroxyethylcellulose solution (Stabilizer
341™, Valchem Chemical Co., Langley, S.C.). The mixture was foamed to a blow ratio
of 5 in an Oakes foamer.
[0064] A 26 pound unbleached crepe kraft paper web, was fed through a pair of horizontal
pad rolls, one steel, and one hard rubber at a rate of 30 feet per minute with a nip
pressure of 30 psi. The foam was applied to both sides of the web as it traversed
the pad rolls. The web was cut into sections and each section was dried in a gas fired
oven at 325°C for 10 seconds. The amount of saturant and physical properties of the
paper product are detailed in Table 1.
Example 2
[0065] The rubber latex saturant formulation of Example 1 was foamed with air to a blow
ratio of 11. The same unbleached crepe kraft paper as in Example 1 was fed through
a Reed-Chatwood pilot horizontal pad foam applicator, with foam applied to both sides
of the web. The paper was impregnated with saturant, and dried on steam heated cans,
at 220°F at a rate of 60 feet per minute. The amount of saturant and physical properties
of the paper product are detailed in Table 1.
Example 3
[0066] An acrylic copolymer latex of 50% solids, having a glass transition temperature (T
g) of -10°C and sold commercially as Valbond 386-9, (Valchem Chemical Co.) was foamed
in Texacote foaming machine to a blow ratio of 10. The foam was applied to a 26 pound
kraft paper using the pilot foam applicator of Example 2. The product was dried 220°F
at a rate of 60 feet per minute. The amount of saturant and physical properties of
the treated web paper are detailed in Table 1.
TABLE 1
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SATURATED KRAFT PAPER |
|
% Wet Add-On |
% Dry Add-On |
Tensile Strength (lbs/in.) |
Blow Ratio |
Untreated Paper |
--- |
--- |
13.4 |
--- |
Conventionally Saturated Paper |
87 |
26 |
19.9 |
--- |
Example 1 |
100 |
54 |
18.6 |
5 |
Example 2 |
48 |
26 |
17.8 |
11 |
Example 3 |
74 |
37 |
21.4 |
10 |
[0067] The data in Table 1, demonstrates that in Example 1 the blow ratio of 5 was too low,
resulting in excessive dry add-on. Higher dry add-on does not contribute to improved
tensile strength. In Example 2 where the blow ratio was 11, the dry add-on was reduced
to the conventional level resulting in a small reduction in tensile strength. Example
3, with an intermediate amount of % wet and % dry add-on for the acrylic copolymer
latex resulted in a higher tensile strength than that of Examples 1 and 2.
[0068] For the conventionally applied saturant, the paper was dipped in a bath containing
25% solid styrene-butadiene latex. The wet paper was compressed using a vertical padder
to remove excess latex. The water to be evaporated per pound of paper was 0.61 pounds
or 47.6 pounds per 1,000 square yards of 26 pound kraft paper.
[0069] For the foam application of Example 2, 0.22 pounds of water per pound of paper or
17.2 pounds per 1,000 square yards of 26 pound kraft paper was evaporated.
[0070] Thus energy consumption for drying was reduced by about 65%. If processing speed
is dictated by drying capacity of the oven, processing speed can be increased by 65%.
Foam processing reduces energy costs while increasing productivity.
Example 4
[0071] An aqueous acrylic release coating sold under the name Valcoat 182™ (Valchem Chemical
Co.) was foamed to a blow ratio of 11:1. The foam was applied to one side of a saturated
crepe paper using a floating knife arrangement as shown in Fig. 2, wherein air and
the release coating (28) were foamed in mechanical foamer (30) to form a foamed release
coating (32) passing through foam delivery pipe (34) which released the foam onto
the surface of the paper web (36). The paper web (36), which can be previously treated
with saturant was unrolled from letoff roll (38) and passed over support rolls (40)
and (42), where the paper web (36) contacted the foam (32) which was metered onto
the surface of the paper web (36) by means of coating knife (44), which caused the
foam to collapse into a liquid. The proportion of foam (32) metered onto the surface
of the paper was controlled by the pressure of the coating knife (44) in such a manner
that no excess liquid was left after the foam (32) collapsed into a liquid in sufficient
amounts to coat the surface of the paper web (36) with the release coating. The treated
paper web (36) then passed into the steam can dryer (46), finally being collected
at takeup roll (48). The coating speed was 30 ft/min. Control parameters and release
properties are detailed in Table 2.
Example 5
[0072] The same acrylic release coating used in Example 4 and foamed to a blow ratio of
8:1, was coated on the same saturated paper under the same conditions of Example 4.
The paper was dried in a gas-fired oven. Control parameters and release properties
are detailed in Table 2.
Example 6
[0073] The same release coating used in Example 4 was foamed to a blow ratio of 8:1 and
coated on a 26 pound saturated masking paper using the floating knife arrangement
in Fig. 2. In the same operation the paper was dried and a solvent based natural rubber
adhesive was applied to the other side and dried. The running speed for this trial
was 600 ft/min. The control parameters and release properties of the masking tape
produced in this trial are detailed in Table 2.
Example 7
[0074] The same acrylic release coating used in Example 4 was foamed to a blow ratio of
8:1 and applied to a 26 pound saturated crepe paper, with a kiss roller, followed
by a scrape blade in accordance with Fig. 3, wherein air and release coating (28)
were foamed in mechanical foamer (30) to form foamed release coating (32) which passed
through foam delivery pipe (34) where it was released and collected in collection
vessel (50) housing a kiss roller (52) which collected the foam release coating (32)
and transferred it to the underside surface of the paper web (36) which unrolled from
letoff roller (38) and traversed over the kiss roller (52). The foamed release coating
(32) was metered onto the underside surface of the paper web (36) by the scrape blade
(54), which also collapsed the foam, allowing any excess to drip back into vessel
(50). The release coated paper web (36) then passed through dryer (46) and was collected
on takeup roll (48). After drying the paper, an adhesive was applied under the same
conditions as in Example 6. The production running speed was 650 ft/min.
[0075] Table 2 shows the control parameters and release properties of the finished masking
tape.
Example 8
[0076] The SBR foamed latex saturant of Example 1 was foamed with air to a 6:1 blow ratio
and applied to a 26 pound unbleached crepe paper as in Example 1. Without an intermediate
drying step, the saturant impregnated paper web was then coated on the surface of
one side with the same foamed acrylic release coating as in Example 4 at a blow ratio
of 11:1 with a floating knife apparatus. The procedure is shown schematically in Fig.
4, wherein air and the saturant composition (1) were mechanically foamed in foamer
(2) to form foamed saturant (3) which passed through foam delivery pipe (4) through
foam distributors (5) and (6) where foamed saturant (3) was released on horizontal
pads (7) and (8) which contacted the paper web (10) collapsing the foamed saturant
into a liquid where it was impregnated in the paper web (10), much in the manner of
Fig. 1, except that the saturant impregnated paper web (36), without an intermediate
drying step, then contacted foamed release coating (32) by means of a coating knife
applicator (44), which metered and collapsed the foamed release coating (32) onto
the surface of the paper web (10), which then passed to dryer (46) and takeup roll
(48), similar to the operation of Fig. 2. The release coating can also be applied
with other means known to the art, such as the kiss roll disclosed in Fig. 3. The
control parameters and release properties of this product are also detailed in Table
2.
[0077] A general purpose masking tape manufactured by Anchor Continental Co. of Columbia,
S.C., was used to test release papers listed in Table 2, which follows. The "conventional
paper" in Table 2 is that used to prepare the general purpose masking tape. The conventional
paper was saturated by being dipped into a 25% solids bath of stryrene-butadiene latex
polymer, squeezed through pad rolls to remove excess latex and then dried. One side
of the paper was then kiss coated with a 28% solids acrylic ester copolymer latex
release coating and dried. As shown in Table 2, the wet add-on of release coating
was 21% and the dry add-on was 4.0%.
TABLE 2
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF FOAM COATED RELEASE PAPERS |
|
Release Coating % Wet Add-on/% Dry Add-on |
Adhesion to ReleaseBacking (oz/in) |
Readhesion (oz/in) |
Roll Ball (cm.) |
Untreated Paper |
---- |
21 |
20 |
.5 |
Conventional Paper |
21/4.0 |
6.9 |
31 |
.5 |
Example 4 |
6.8/3 |
7.2 |
32 |
.5 |
Example 5 |
8.4/3.7 |
7.1 |
30 |
.5 |
Example 6 |
7.9/3.5 |
6.8 |
30 |
.5 |
Example 7 |
8.8/3.9 |
6.3 |
31 |
.5 |
Example 8(a) |
13.6/6.0 |
4.9 |
32 |
2.3 |
(a): Saturant Wet Add-on: 75% |
Saturant Dry Add-on: 41% |
Tensile strength after saturation: 24 lbs./in |
[0078] Readhesion is a measure of the peel strength of the adhesive measured against a stainless
steel plate after the adhesive has been contact with a release coating for 20 minutes.
This is a modification of PSTC-1.
[0079] The data demonstrate that the foam application of the high solids (undiluted) release
coating results in a product with performance characteristics equivalent to that of
a conventionally applied release coating. However, the water required to apply the
release coating was reduced by 60 to 80%, thereby reducing energy consumption by the
same proportion.
EXAMPLE 9
[0080] Two aqueous silicone release coatings were prepared.
A conventional coating consisted of:
|
Parts |
Water |
327 |
Acetic Acid |
0.1 |
Silicone GE2145 (General Electric) |
31 |
Catalyst GE2126C (General Electric) |
7.56 |
|
365.66 |
A foamable coating consisted of:
|
Parts |
Water |
228 |
Acetic Acid |
0.2 |
Silicone GE2145 (General Electric) |
62 |
Catalyst GE2126C (General Electric) |
15 |
Sodium lauryl sulfate (Sipex UB, Alcolac Co., Baltimore, MD) |
4.5 |
|
309.7 |
[0081] The conventional coating was applied to a 35 pound machine finished paper using a
wire wound rod coater. The foamable coating was foamed to a blow ratio of 13 to 1
and applied to the machine finished paper using a floating knife applicator.
[0082] The coated papers were dried in a oven. Both release papers were then coated with
a butyl acrylate/vinyl acetate emulsion copolymer pressure sensitive adhesive Valtac
28ST (Valchem Co.). The coatings were dried and laminated to a white 3 mil vinyl film,
by passing through pad rolls at 30 psi.
[0083] The wet and dry coating weights of release coating, the dry coating weight of adhesive,
the peel adhesion of the adhesive coated vinyl and the force necessary to peel the
release coated paper from the adhesive coated vinyl (adhesion to release paper) are
recorded in Table 3.
[0084] It is evident that the performance of the foam applied release coating is equivalent
to the conventionally applied coating but the foamed coating was applied using 51%
less water corresponding to a comparable percentage energy saving during drying.
TABLE 3
SILICONE RELEASE COATING |
|
Foam |
Conventional |
Wet add-on of release (lbs/ream)a |
3.1 |
6.0 |
|
Dry add-on of release (lbs/ream)a |
.29 |
.27 |
Dry add-on of adhesive (oz/yd²) |
.42 |
.42 |
Adhesion to release paper (gms/in) |
20 |
19 |
Peel adhesion to stainless steel (gms/in) |
206 |
181 |
a: area of ream = 3,000 ft² |
1. A method for applying a release coating to a fibrous substrate comprising:
a) forming a foam composition containing a sufficient amount of release coating;
b) contacting said foamed release coating composition onto said substrate and collapsing
said foam; and
c) drying said substrate.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said fibrous substrate comprises a woven or non-woven
material selected from the group consisting of cellulose, nylon, rayon, cellulose
diacetate, cellulose triacetate, polyamide resins, polyester resins, polyacrylic resins,
polyvinyl resins, polyolefin resins, glass, metal, abaca, sisal, henequen, jute, cotton,
ramie, flax, hemp, silk, wool, mohair cashmere, vicuna, alpaca, and mixtures thereof.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein said the release coating is selected from the group
consisting of acrylic ester copolymer resins, vinyl acetate copolymer resins, silicone
resins, polyamide resins and polyester resins.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the release coating is a latex selected from the
group consisting of acrylic ester copolymers, vinyl acetate copolymers, and silicone
resins.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the foamed release composition has a blow ratio
varying from about 5 to about 20.
6. The method of claim 2, wherein said substrate is paper or a woven or non-woven
fabric.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein prior to the application of the release coating,
a foam composition is formed containing a sufficient amount of saturant, and said
foamed saturant is contacted onto a paper web and collapsed, thereby impregnating
said substrate with said saturant, followed by the application of the foamed release
coating without an intermediate drying step.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein said saturant is selected from the group consisting
of natural rubber latices, styrene-butadiene rubber emulsion polymer latices, polyacrylic
ester emulsions, polyvinyl acetate emulsions, polyurethane emulsions, and mixtures
thereof.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the foamed saturant has a blow ratio varying from
about 1.5 to about 25.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the blow ratio of the foamed saturant is lower
than the blow ratio of the foamed release composition.
11. The method of claim 6, wherein said substrate is used to manufacture a pressure
sensitive adhesive tape.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein said adhesive is selected from the group consisting
of tackified rubber, tackified hot melt adhesives, tackified rubber emulsion adhesives,
acrylic ester polymer adhesives and mixtures thereof.
13. The method of claim 7, wherein the foam is formed in a mechanical foam generator
using a gas selected from the group consisting of air, nitrogen, oxygen, inert gases,
and mixtures thereof.
14. The method of claim 7, wherein the foamed saturant or foamed release composition
contains a foaming agent selected from the group consisting of sodium lauryl sulfate,
ammonium stearate, fatty acid diethanolamide, ethoxylated fatty acids, and mixtures
thereof.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the amount of foaming agent varies from about
0.02 to about 5% by weight of the respective saturant or release composition.
16. The method of claim 11, wherein the foaming gas is air.
17. The method of claim 1, wherein the drying temperature varies from about 150° to
450° Fahrenheit.
18. The method of claim 1, wherein said foam is collapsed by an external force selected
from the group consisting of compression or vacuum.
19. The method of claim 7, wherein said foam is collapsed by an external force selected
from the group consisting of compression or vacuum.
20. The method of claim 11, wherein said substrate is paper.
21. The method of claim 11, wherein said substrate is a non-woven fabric.
22. The method of claim 1, wherein said foamed release coating composition is contacted
onto said substrate by means selected from the group consisting of a floating knife
applicator, a kiss roll applicator, and a slot die foam applicator.
23. The method of claim 6, wherein said foamed saturant is contacted onto said substrate
by means selected from the group consisting of a horizontal pad roll applicator, a
slot die foam applicator, and a rotary screen applicator.
24. A method for applying a saturant and a release coating to a fibrous substrate
comprising:
(a) forming a foam composition containing a sufficient amount of saturant;
(b) contacting said foamed saturant onto said fibrous substrate and collapsing said
foam, thereby impregnating the fibrous substrate with said saturant;
(c) forming a release coating composition;
(d) contacting said release coating composition onto said fibrous substrate following
the impregnation of said saturant, without an intermediate drying step; and
(e) drying the saturant impregnated and release coated fibrous substrate.
25. The method of claim 24, wherein the release coating composition is in the form
of a foam.
26. The method of claim 24, wherein the release coating composition is not foamed.