[0001] This invention relates to the controlled release of medications or active substances
which are administered transdermally. More particularly, this invention relates to
a membrane for controlling the release of at least one drug or medication, which membrane
can be fabricated or incorporated into a composite structure by heat sealing.
[0002] Rate controlling membranes have been used as a component of transdermal drug delivery
devices. Silicone elastomers have often been employed in such applications because
of the permeability of such elastomers to a number of drugs and medications. The use
of silicone rubbers in such applications is limited commercially, however, because
it is difficult to economically attach the cured membrane material to the other materials
from which such devices are constructed. Such membranes are designed to control the
rate at which these medications are released through the membrane into the skin of
the patient. A reservoir containing the medication is sometimes placed between the
membrane and an impermeable backing material and a pressure sensitive adhesive applied
over all or a portion of the membrane to attach the composite transdermal drug delivery
device to the skin of the patient.
[0003] Depending upon the type of drug or medication and the desired release rate, the rate
controlling portion of the device that is permeable to the medication has hithertofore
been a layer of non-porous material such as ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer or crosslinked
silicone rubber or a porous film. The medication permeates through the matrix, if
any, that forms the drug containing reservoir, the membrane and the pressure sensitive
adhesive, if the latter is positioned between the drug containing reservoir and the
skin. The exposed surface of the pressure sensitive adhesive is generally covered
by a release liner which is removed and discarded when the device is used.
[0004] An objective of this invention is to provide materials for membranes that enable
the migration therethrough of a variety of medications and which can be heat sealed
onto a variety of substrates or backings. By elimination of the need of using adhesives
between the silicone membrane and other parts of the device (e.g., the backing), which
adhesives might alter the rate of drug delivery or present either health hazards or
problems of incompatability with the medication being administered, a number of problems
encountered with the prior art are eliminated. Also an important advantage in the
ability to employ commercially feasible assembly methods in manufacture of drug delivery
devices is attained.
[0005] The present inventors discovered that membranes formed from certain members of the
broad class of segmented block copolymers are unique by virtue of 1) their high permeability
to the ingredients of various mixtures of medications including those of a hydrophilic
type, 2) their resistance to swelling and/or degradation by ingredients of the medications,
3) their biocompatability, and 4) their ability to be fabricated into composite devices
by the use of heat and pressure without adhesives.
[0006] The present copolymers comprise a hard segment which comprises an organic diisocyanate
or is derived from the reaction of an organic diisocyanate with a diol and a soft
segment (or oligomer) containing at least one polydiorganosiloxane unit, preferably
a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) unit, as a hydrophobic portion and, optionally, one
or more oxyethylene units as a hydrophilic portion. Films formed from these copolymers
are particularly useful for controlling the release of drugs and medications to the
skin of a patient to whom the desired drug is being administered.
[0007] Briefly summarized, the present invention provides, in a transdermal drug delivery
system, which includes in combination: (a) an impermeable backing member; (b) a drug
permeable membrane (which can be a release rate controlling membrane), and (c) a reservoir
containing a medicinally active ingredient; the improvement characterized by the fact
that said membrane is heat and pressure sealed to said backing without the use of
a separate adhesive and comprises a substantially linear block copolymer which is
a reaction product of a polydiorganosiloxane (which is provided with end groups that
are reactive with isocyanate groups, eg., -RNH₂, -OH or - SH) which form "soft" segments
in said reaction product and a diisocyanate which forms "hard" segments, said copolymer
having a hard segment glass transition temperature between 50°C. and 200°C. said soft
segments comprising from 60 to 90 percent by weight, based on the weight of said copolymer,
the average molecular weight of said copolymer being between 50,000 and 500,000.
[0008] This invention provides a membrane material for controlling the release from a reservoir
to the skin or mucosa of a patient of at least one drug or medication, where
1) the rate controlling membrane comprises a heat sealable layer of a solid polymer
having a glass transition temperature between about 50° and 200°C., where said layer
is inert with respect to and permeable with respect to said drug or medication,
2) said membrane is heat sealed without the use of other adhesives to a backing, and
3) said membrane comprises a layer 0.01 to 1 mm. thick of a substantially linear block
copolymer comprising from 10 to 40 weight percent of "hard" segments consisting essentially
of polyurethane or polyurea units derived from an organic diisocyanate and, if desired,
an alkylene diol and from 60 to 90 weight percent of "soft" segments comprising from
20 to 90 percent by weight, based on the weight of said copolymer, of a hydrophobic
portion consisting essentially of at least one polydiorganosiloxane unit and from
0 to 70 percent by weight, based on the weight of said copolymer, of a hydrophilic
portion consisting essentially of at least one polyalkylene oxide unit. The presence
and amount of hydrophilic portions is dependent on the nature, particularly the hydrophilicity
or lipophilicity of the drug which is intended to be delivered through the membrane.
[0009] This invention also provides an improved method for forming a composite drug delivery
device, by heat sealing onto a backing (which may be either a drug impermeable polymer,
metal foil or the like) a layer of a polymeric material that is from 0.01 to 1 mm.
thick and permeable to said drug where the drug or medication is positioned between
the backing and a membrane formed from said polymeric material comprising the substantially
linear block copolymers described in the preceding paragraph.
[0010] The drug permeable membrane (which may be rate controlling) for releasing the medicinal
ingredients from the drug-containing reservoir of the drug delivery device is a drug
permeable, heat sealable, thermoplastic layer of a diorganosiloxane/polyurethane segmented
or block copolymer. The copolymer can optionally contain blocks of polyalkylene oxide
molecules if it is desired to increase the hydrophilicity of the element. The term
"polyurethane" as used herein is intended to refer to not only polyurethanes, but
also, polyureas and polyurethane-ureas, all of which are commonly referred to in the
art generically as polyurethanes.
[0011] The molecules of block copolymer that constitute the drug permeable membranes of
the present invention contain at least one segment of a "hard" polymer and at least
one segment of a "soft" polymer. It is understood in the art that the terms "hard"
and "soft" as applied to segments of block copolymers refer to the relative glass
transition temperatures (T
g) of the two segments. The hard segments have a higher T
g than the soft segments.
[0012] The hard segment of the present copolymers is a polyurea or polyurethane derived
from an organic diisocyanate and, optionally, a low molecular weight diol or diamine,
sometimes referred to as a chain extender. Any of the available aliphatic, aromatic
or cycloaliphatic diisocyanates can be used to prepare the polyurea or polyurethane
portion of these copolymers. Preferred diisocyanates include but are not limited to
p-toluene diisocyanate (TDI), 4,4′-diphenylmethanediisocyanate (MDI) and 4,4′-dicyclohexylmethyldiisocyanate
(H₁₂MDI) and isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI).
[0013] The chain extender portion of the polyurethane can be any of the available aliphatic
diols or diamines containing from 2 up to about 10 carbon atoms. Diols containing
from 2 to 4 carbon atoms are preferred.
[0014] The hard segment constitutes from 10 to 40 weight percent of the copolymer, preferably
from 15 to 35 weight percent and the molar ratio of hard segment (diisocyanate and
aliphatic diol units) to soft segments (polydiorganosiloxane and polyalkylene oxide
units) is from 3/1 to 7/1, preferably about 5/1. The soft segment of the present copolymers
may include a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic portion. The hydrophobic portion of the
copolymer molecules consists essentially of at least one sequence of from 15 to about
100 diorganosiloxane units and these sequences constitute from 20 to 90 weight percent,
preferably from 40 to 80 weight percent, of the copolymer. Methods for preparing functionally
substituted polydimethylsiloxanes or other polydiorganosiloxanes and copolymerizing
these polymers with diisocyanates and other organic monomers are known in the art
and do not form part of this invention. See, for example, Gornowicz et al., U.S. Patent
No. 4,631,629.
[0015] The hydrophilic portion of the soft segment consists essentially of at least one
sequence per copolymer molecule of from 5 to 75 oxyethylene units, which can be present
as part of the linear portion of the copolymer or as pendant groups attached to the
diorganosiloxane units. The oxyethylene units constitute from 0 to 70 weight percent
of the copolymer.
[0016] The molecular weight of the copolymer is not considered critical to the ability of
the copolymer to function as the rate-controlling element for release of medications
in accordance with the present invention. The optimum molecular weight range for a
given copolymer will be determined by the desired physical properties of the copolymer,
such as tensile strength, elongation and tear strength and particularly the glass
transition temperature of the hard segment of the copolymer. The weight average molecular
weight is preferably from 30,000 to about 500,000. If the rate-controlling element
is prepared from a heat sealable copolymer of this invention, the weight average molecular
weight of the copolymer is typically in the range of from 50,000 to about 200,000
to facilitate heat sealing at temperatures which are feasible from a commercial manufacturing
viewpoint.
[0017] Methods for preparing dimethylsiloxane/polyurethane urea-oxyethylene copolymers are
described in patents and other literature. See for example, Tyagi et al., "Segmented
Organosiloxane Copolymers",
Polymer, Vol. 25, pp 1807- 1816. In accordance with a preferred method, a liquid amino functional
(endblocked) polydiorganosiloxane containing from 15 to about 100 repeating units
per molecule, wherein the amino endblocking unit is, for example:

and is at the two terminal positions, is reacted with the organic diisocyanate and
a polyalkylene oxide by heating the mixture in the presence of a suitable catalyst.
The aliphatic diol or other chain extender that forms part of the hard segment is
then added to the reaction mixture and heating continued for an additional 2 to 16
hours. The reaction is preferably conducted under an inert atmosphere such as nitrogen
using as the reaction medium an organic liquid such as toluene, tetrahydrofuran (THF)
or a mixture of toluene and more polar solvents such as tetrahydrofuran or N,N-dimethlyformamide
(DMF) that will dissolve all of the reactants and the resultant copolymer. The preferred
polydiorganosiloxane is polydimethylsiloxane because of high drug permeability, biocompatability,
cost and availability.
[0018] The substituents represented by R and R˝ in the preceeding formula are monovalent
hydrocarbon radicals and R′ represents an alkylene radical. Each of the radicals R,
R′ and R˝ may be the same or different.
[0019] Membranes or films of the present copolymers control the rate at which the medicinal
ingredients of drug compositions are released from a reservoir into the skin of a
patient. Depending upon the release rate of a particular drug through the copolymer,
those skilled in the art can fabricate a drug delivery device designed to suit the
particular application by altering the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the copolymer
to tailor it to the specific drug.
[0020] The present block copolymers are thermoplastic and can be processed to form films
using any of the known techniques for fabricating thermoplastic organic polymers.
These techniques include but are not limited to pressing, blowing, calendaring and
extrusion of bulk copolymers and dissolving the copolymers to form solutions that
are then applied to a suitable substrate to form coatings as thin as 0.01 mm. Depending
upon the desired release rate and the design of the drug delivery device the film
or layer can be from 0.01 up to 1 mm. in thickness. The copolymer can be in the form
of a self-supporting film or can be extruded and/or calendared directly onto a substrate
which will form the backing for a drug delivery device with the drug sandwiched between.
[0021] Membranes of the present invention can be incorporated into a drug delivery device
by heat sealing the membrane over a drug containing reservoir which is sandwiched
between the membrane and a backing material, which may be, for example, plastic or
metal foil. The membrane is positioned with the periphery therof extending beyond
the perimeter of the reservoir. If desired, the membrane may be heat sealed onto the
backing by applying heat and pressure, for example, using platen presses or rotary
dies. A layer of pressure sensitive adhesive is then applied either over the entire
exposed surface of the membrane or at least the periphery thereof.
[0022] The specific drugs used are not critical to this invention and, as used herein, the
term "drug" is to be construed in its broadest sense as a material which is intended
to produce some beneficial effect on the organism to which it is applied. As used
herein, a drug in its acid or basic form is considered to be oleophobic if the solubility
of the drug in mineral oil is less than about 100 mg/g. A drug is considered to be
"highly polar" when the percent ionization of the drug in an aqueous drug reservoir
is at least about 95%. This occurs when the pKa of the drug differs from the pH of
the reservoir by an absolute value of at least 1.3. The pKa of a drug is the pH of
an aqueous solution in which 50% is in the unionized base or acid form. Since physiological
pH of the skin is in the range of approximately 5.5 - 7.2; the pKa for acidic drugs
according to this invention is lower than about 4.2 and for basic drugs, higher than
8.5. Representative drugs meeting these criteria include, without limitation, acidic
drugs such as the sodium or other salts of indomethacin, acetazolamide, methazolamide
and acetylsalisylic acid, for example, and salts or acid salts of basic drugs such
as naltrexone HCl, naloxone HCl, nalbuphine HCl, phenylephrine HCl, chlorpheniramine
maleate, phenylpropanolamine HCl, clonidine HCl, dextromethophan HBr, atropine sulfate,
fentanyl citrate, apomorphine sulfate, propranolol HCl, lidocaine HCl, tetracycline
HCl, oxytetracycline HCl, tetracaine HCl, dibucaine HCl, terbutaline sulfate and brompheniramine
maleate, for example. Polar drugs generally require the incorporation of a hydrophilic
component into the soft blocks of the copolymer whereas lipophilic (oleophilic) drugs
will generally be transmitted through copolymers which do not contain such a component.
[0023] The following examples describe preferred embodiments of the present copolymers.
The examples should not be interpreted as restricting the scope of the invention as
defined in the accompanying claims. Unless otherwise specified, all parts and percentages
in the examples are by weight.
Example 1
[0024] Urethane-urea copolymers were prepared using procedures outlined in U.S. Patent 4,631,629.
The mole ratio of diisocyanate to low molecular weight alkylenediol, chain extender
to aminoalkyl endblocked (PDMS) plus polyalkylene oxide (if used) was kept at 3/2/1.
Preparation of PDMS-PTMO Urethane (Copolymer 6)
[0025] (H₁₂MDI) (106 g, 0.795 eq) and toluene (375 g) were put in a 3 liter, 3-neck flask
equipped with an air stirrer, reflux condenser, addition funnel and nitrogen atmosphere.
Methylamino-i-butyl endblocked PDMS (240.5 g, 0.14 eq) in toluene (700 g) was added
slowly over a 30 minute period. A solution of PTMO (133.8 g, 0.125 eq) in toluene
(133.8 g) and 0.3 ml of dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) (10% solution) were added and
the temperature was increased to 100°C. After 1 hour, 1,4-butanediol (BD) (23.85 g,
0.53 eq) was added. Toluene (100 g) was used to rinse the addition funnel. Reaction
was heated at 100°C. overnight until all the isocyanate had reacted. The solution
was poured into baking dishes. After it cooled to room temperature, it formed a soft
rubber. The rubber was cut into small pieces and the solvent was permitted to evaporate
in a hood. Residual solvent was removed in a vacuum oven to give Copolymer 6.
Preparation of PDMS-PEO Urethane (Copolymer 7)
[0026] (H₁₂MDI) (106 g, 0.795 eq) and toluene (300 g) were charged to a 3 liter, 3 neck
flask equipped with an air stirrer, reflux condenser, addition funnel and nitrogen
atmosphere. Methylamino-i-butyl endblocked PDMS (30 dp) (218.2 g, 0.185 eq) dissolved
in toluene (600 g) was added over a period of 30 minutes. Dry Carbowax 1450 (63.8
g, 0.08 eq) in toluene (63.8 g) and DBTDL (0.3 ml of 10% solution in toluene) were
added and the reaction was heated at 100°C. for one hour. 1,4-butanediol (23.85 g,
0.53 eq) was added and the reaction was heated at 95°C. overnight. The hot solution
was poured into baking dishes. Upon cooling the product, a swollen elastomer, was
cut into small pieces and most of the solvent was permitted to evaporate in a hood.
The remaining solvent was removed in a vacuum oven at 100°C. to give copolymer 7.
Preparation of MDI Urethanes (Copolymer 4)
[0027] (MDI) (250 g, 2.0 eq) and toluene were put in a 5 liter flask equipped with an air
stirrer, reflux condenser, addition funnel and nitrogen atmosphere. Methylamino-i-butyl
endblocked PDMS (389.5 g) in toluene (816 g) and DBTDL (0.3 ml of 10% solution) was
added slowly. An exothermic reaction increased the temperature from 25°C. to 33°C.
The temperature was increased to 96°C. and BD (60 g, 1.33 eq) was added. The temperature
increased from 96 to 112°C. The reaction became cloudy and 800 ml of DMF was added
to give a clear solution. After all the isocyanate had reacted, the solvents were
removed in a vacuum oven.
[0028] The other copolymers referred to in Tables I-IV were prepared using similar procedures,
utilizing the proportions of ingredients indicated in the table.
Example 2 - Heat Seal Tests
[0029] About 5 g of copolymer was put in a 0.254 mm chase with calendered Teflon release
sheets. These were placed in steam heated mold at 165°C. Initially, the pressure was
increased slowly, 1 to 35 MPa, to allow the copolymer time to flow. Then the pressure
was increased rapidly to 100 to 140 MPa for about 2 minutes. The sample was cooled
to less than 50°C. This first membrane usually contained wrinkles. The membrane was
remolded with new Teflon release sheets to give a smooth, uniform membrane approximately
0.25 mm thick.
[0030] Qualitative heat seal tests were run on small pieces of membranes using a Clamco
Model 250B variable temperature, heat sealer. Copolymer 1 was evaluated with a number
of thermoplastic materials at 177°C. Good to excellent seals were obtained with polar
materials, such as nylon 66 (sealed at 260°C.), acrylic and Alcryn® ALX 6387 (thermoplastic
elastomer from duPont). Fair adhesion was obtained with the thermoplastic elastomer
Santoprene® 101-73A black. Poor or no adhesion was obtained with the non-polar polystyrene,
polypropylene and a sodium carboxylate polyethylene ionomer or Santoprene® 101-73A
neutral.
[0031] Quantitative tests were run on 2.54 cm wide strips. The area of the heat seal was
1.61 cm². The seal (or shear) strength is equal to four times the force required to
break the seal. Results are recorded in Table III. A number of heat sealed samples
were immersed in water for 7 days. The seals retained essentially all their strength,
see Table IV.
Example 3 - Permeability Testing
[0032] 1. A Ghannam-Chien membrane permeation system was employed to assess the in vitro
permeation of progesterone and hydrocortisone through the silicone urethane membranes
according to a modification of the method of Tojo. [K. Tojo, Y. Sun, M. Ghannam and
Y. W. Chien. Characterization of a Membrane Permeation System for Controlled Drug
Delivery Studies AICHE Journal, 31(5), 741-46 (1985).]
[0033] Progesterone and hydrocortisone were selected as a lipophilic and hydrophilic molecular
probe of a steroidal structure, respectively. The permeation system was composed of
a donor and receptor compartment in which the fluid is agitated by a matching set
of bar shaped magnets. A 200 ml volume of a saturated drug solution employing 40 percent
(v/v) of polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG 400) in distilled water was placed in the donor
compartment and 200 ml of drug free solvent placed in the receptor compartment. The
membrane having a surface area of 13.85 cm² and thickness ranging from 0.25 to 0.63
centimeters was mounted between both cells. The temperature of solution was maintained
at 37°C. and agitated at 700 rpm. Permeation studies were conducted over a 24 hour
period and aliquots of receptor solution removed at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 16 and
24 hours and quantitated for drug content by use of UV spectrophotometry. The steady
state permeation rate (flux) was determined by Linear Regression Analysis from the
cummulative drug release versus time relationship. The steady state flux corresponds
to the slope of the line.
[0034] In general progesterone, a lipophilic steroid, possessed a greater normalized flux
through the silicone urethane copolymer membranes compared to hydrocortisone, a more
hydrophilic steroid (Table V). The permeation rate of each drug could be tailored
within a modest range by selection of the appropriate silicone-urethane copolymer
or copolymer blends (Table V).
Example 4 - Biocompatibility Testing
1. Tissue cell culture: Cytotoxicity Test
[0035] The tissue cell culture tests are designed to determine the cytopathic effects (CPE)
of a material or its extracts in contact with monolayers of diploid human cells.
[0036] No CPE was produced by Copolymer No. 1 in direct contact or by its cell culture medium
extract. However, one of the two initial dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) extracts produced
a CPE. The two subsequent DMSO extracts tested were negative. Therefore, this sample
has passed these tissue cell culture tests.
[0037] The test material was evaluated for cytotoxicity by placing the material in direct
contact with confluent monolayers of human fetal cells for 24 hours. The cytopathic
effects of the test material were microscopically compared against a positive and
a negative control.
[0038] In addition, the test material was extracted using a ratio of 3 cm² of sample surface
area to 1 ml extraction medium. The DMSO preparations were autoclaved for one hour
at 121°C. and then diluted to 2%. The preparations were incubated at 38°C. for 24
hours. The extracts were tested by aspirating the medium from acceptable wells and
replacing it with 1.5 ml of the extract preparations from the test material. After
incubation for 24 hours, the cytopathic effects were microscopically evaluated against
both a positive and a negative control.
TABLE I
COMPOSITIONS OF HEAT SEALABLE, SILICONE URETHANE COPOLYMERS |
Copolymers |
Wt % |
Wt % |
Wt % |
Wt % |
Wt % |
|
H₁₂MDI |
BD |
PDMS |
PTMO |
PEO |
1 |
23.85 |
5.36 |
70.79 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
2 |
18.21 |
4.10 |
77.69 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
3 |
32.61* |
7.83 |
31.85 |
27.72 |
0.00 |
4 |
35.74* |
8.58 |
55.68 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
5 |
24.44 |
5.50 |
50.32 |
19.74 |
0.00 |
6 |
21.03 |
4.73 |
47.70 |
26.54 |
0.00 |
7 |
25.74 |
5.79 |
52.98 |
0.00 |
15.49 |
8 |
26.83 |
6.04 |
40.31 |
0.00 |
26.81 |
9 |
31.95 |
7.19 |
29.21 |
31.65 |
0.00 |
10 |
32.25 |
7.25 |
50.42 |
10.08 |
0.00 |
11 |
29.12 |
6.54 |
21.81 |
42.53 |
0.00 |
TABLE II
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES AND MOLECULAR WEIGHTS OF HEAT SEALABLE, SILICONE URETHANE COPOLYMERS |
Copolymer |
Tensile ¹ |
Elongation |
Tear ² |
Durometer ³ |
GPC ⁴ |
|
(MPa) |
(%) |
(KN/m) |
(Shore A) |
Mw |
1 |
11.4 |
420 |
33.2 |
85 |
229,000 |
2 |
6.9 |
440 |
16.6 |
74 |
267,000 |
3 |
26.3 |
570 |
68.2 |
88 |
191,000 |
4 |
17.5 |
233 |
110.2 |
96 |
85,700 |
5 |
5.9 |
340 |
27.1 |
76 |
153,000 |
6 |
7.9 |
300 |
22.8 |
74 |
176,000 |
7 |
9.9 |
600 |
26.2 |
82 |
230,000 |
8 |
6.9 |
930 |
29.8 |
73 |
178,000 |
9 |
40.5 |
540 |
63.0 |
92 |
136,000 |
10 |
21.6 |
300 |
82.2 |
94 |
89,800 |
11 |
37.2 |
600 |
NTa |
NT |
118,000 |
1. Tensile strength and elongation were tested in accordance with ASTM D 412-80. |
2. Tear Strength was determined in accordance with ASTM D 624-81. |
3. Durometer was tested in accordance with ASTM D 2240-86. |
4. Gel permeation chomotography (GPC) was run in THF as 2 ml/min using polystyrene
calibration standards. |
a not tested |
TABLE III
QUANTITATIVE HEAT SEAL TEST RESULTS OF SILICONE URETHANE COPOLYMERS |
Copolymer |
Per cent Siloxane |
Seal Temp deg. C |
Shear Strength (MPa) against |
|
|
|
Scotchpak® 1006 |
Scotchpak® 1012 |
Scotchpak® 1220 |
Mylar® |
Polyethylene |
1 |
70 |
157 |
NTa |
NT |
0.21 |
NT |
NT |
2 |
78 |
157 |
NT |
NT |
0.11 |
NT |
NT |
3 |
30 |
177 |
0.33 |
NT |
NT |
0.32 |
NT |
4 |
56 |
177 |
0.05 |
NT |
NT |
0.51 |
NT |
5 |
50 |
121 |
0.13 |
0.15 |
0.16 |
0.13 |
0.03 |
6 |
37.7 |
121 |
0.06 |
0.10 |
0.09 |
0.12 |
0.03 |
7 |
53 |
157 |
NT |
0.19 |
NT |
0.17 |
NT |
8 |
40 |
113 |
NT |
0.16 |
0.12 |
0.15 |
NT |
8 |
40 |
121 |
NT |
0.13 |
0.12 |
0.14 |
NT |
8 |
40 |
130 |
NT |
0.15 |
NT |
0.16 |
NT |
TABLE IV
SHEAR STRENGTH OF HEAT SEALS OF SILICONE URETHANE COPOLYMERS AFTER 7 DAYS WATER IMMERSION |
Copolymer |
Per cent Siloxane |
Seal Temp. deg. F. |
Shear strength (MPa) against |
|
|
|
Scotchpak® 1220 |
Mylar® |
7 |
53 |
157 |
NTa |
0.13 (78%)* |
1 |
70 |
157 |
0.24 (116%)* |
NT |
2 |
78 |
157 |
0.09 (85%)* |
NT |
a Not tested (NT) |
* Percentage of shear strength prior to water soak. |
TABLE V
PERMEABILITY OF SELECTED DRUGS THROUGH HEAT SEALABLE SILICONE URETHANE COPOLYMER MEMBRANES |
Copolymer Number |
Normalized Permeability (micrograms) (cm)/(cm²)(hr) |
|
progesterone |
hydrocortisone |
1 |
0.111 |
0.005 |
9 |
0.025 |
0.006 |
10 |
0.023 |
NTa |
11 |
0.505 |
NT |
25/75* |
0.054 |
0.004 |
50/50* |
0.042 |
0.004 |
75/25* |
0.084 |
0.005 |
a Not Tested (NT) |
* Blends of copolymers 1 and 9 with the first number signifying weight percentage
of copolymer 1 and the second number signifying weight percentage of copolymer 9. |