[0001] This invention is concerned with the provision of a safety container comprising in
combination a container body and a cap and the invention also includes a cap and body
for use in such a safety container. By a safety container we mean a container that
can easily be opened by adults but which is difficult for children to open.
[0002] An early form of safety container is described in British Patent No.1387572, hereinafter
called the Sunbeam Patent, which describes a twist-action screw cap for a container
comprising a top, an inner wall depending from the top, retaining means on the inner
wall operative by twist-action for co-operation with retaining means on the container
neck, a resilient outer skirt depending from the top concentric with the inner wall
and at least one lug depending from the outer skirt to an extremity below the inner
wall for engagement in a recess in the exterior of the container as the cap is twisted
to a closed position. The safety container described in the Sunbeam Patent is effective
but the lug or lugs depending like ears from the outer skirt are rather ugly and this
detracts from the appearance of the product on the market. In this connection it should
be stated that there is no doubt that the purchasing public like to purchase products
that are packed in an attractive container with a smooth outer profile.
[0003] Our British Patent No. 1524395 describes another form of safety container comprising
a one piece body with a mouth and an external screw-threaded portion around the mouth
and a one piece cap with an internal screw threaded portion at the top for engagement
with the container body and shaped so that the inner surface of the cap tapers outwardly
below the screw threaded part towards the bottom of the cap whereby when the cap is
seated on the container body there is a space between the inner surface at the bottom
of the cap and the outer surface of the container body and interlocking projections
on the cap and on the container body for engagement with one another when the cap
is screwed on to the container body to prevent removal of the cap until the cap or
the body is squeezed at oppositely disposed positions away from the points of engagement
of the projections to deform the cap or the body so that the projections are disengaged
to permit unscrewing of the cap. The safety container described in our British Patent
is also effective and the construction does not involve the depending lug or lugs
extending below the skirt of the cap so that the outer profile of the product is more
attractive than the appearance of the safety container described in the Sunbeam Patent.
On the other hand the safety container described in our British Patent does require
the use of a tapering skirt on the cap and a long neck on the container body which
involves other problems and is impracticable on some types of bottle.
[0004] One object of the present invention is to provide a safety container in which the
cap meets the body in such a way as to present a smooth unbroken outer profile while
at the same time the product is an effective safety container which children will
find difficult to open.
[0005] According to the present invention there is provided a safety container comprising
a screw cap and a container body wherein the container body has a neck, a mouth at
the end of the neck and a screw thread around the outside of the neck below the mouth
and wherein the cap has a relatively short inner skirt with an internal screw-thread
to cooperate with the external screw-thread on the neck of the container body and
a relatively long outer skirt concentrically surrounding the inner skirt, projections
or lugs on the inside of the outer skirt of the cap and projections or cams on the
outside of the container body below the screw-thread being provided for engagement
with one another when the cap is screwed on to the container body to prevent removal
of the cap until the outer skirt of the cap is squeezed at oppositely disposed positions
away from the points of engagement of the projections to deform the outer skirt so
that the projections are disengaged to permit unscrewing of the cap.
[0006] One considerable advantage of our new construction of safety container is that our
new cap may be applied effectively to a considerable number of existing container
bodies with relatively simple changes to each of the bodies, such changes being effected
by modification of the moulds in which the bodies are produced to provide the projections
on the neck of each body.
[0007] In order that the invention may be more clearly understood reference is now directed
to the accompanying diagrammatic drawings in which:
Figure 1 is a side elevation of one form of safety container in accordance with the
present invention.
Figure 2 is a section across the centre line of the cap which is shown in position
on a container body so that the cap interior and neck details are clearly illustrated.
Figure 3 is a diagrammatic plan view of the cap in its closed position.
Figure 4 is a diagrammatic plan view of the cap being squeezed at the sides so that
the cap can be unscrewed for removal,
Figure 5 is a sectional plan view of the container body showing the body ratchet detail.
Figure 6 is a part section, part elevation of a modified construction in accordance
with the invention.
[0008] These drawings illustrate only the principles of the invention and not necessarily
the precise constructional details and sizes.
[0009] Referring first to Figures 1 to 5, a cap 1 has a top 2, an inner skirt 3, an internal
screw-thread 4 on the inner skirt 3 and an outer skirt 5. The outer skirt 5 has two
oppositely disposed internal projections or locking lugs 6 and two oppositely disposed
squeeze positions or pads 7 displaced, preferably by 90
o from lugs 6.
[0010] Referring now particularly to Figure 2, a container body 8 has a neck 9 with a jetting
plug 10 including a mouth 10¹ and an external screw-thread 11 around the neck 9 for
engagement by the thread 4 on the inner skirt 3 of the cap 1. The body 8 also has
oppositely disposed external raised ratchet shaped cams or projections 12 for cooperation
with the lugs 6. In operation as the cap 1 is screwed on to the container body clockwise
in Figure 5 the lugs 6 ride over the cams 12 along surfaces 13 until the cap 1 is
fully seated in position to close the mouth 10¹ of the body 8 but any attempt to unscrew
the cap 1 will fail because the lugs 6 will abut against a shoulder 14 on each of
the cams 12. The engagement of the lugs 6 with the cams 12 can be released by applying
pressure pads 7 in the direction of the arrows 15 in Figure 4 to deform the outer
skirt 5 onto an oval shape as shown in Figure 4 whereupon the cap 2 can be unscrewed
in the direction of the arrow 16.
[0011] Our improved safety container may be made from any suitable plastics material the
inner skirt 3 preferably being more robust than the outer skirt 5. A safety container
according to this invention will, we think, be very useful when incorporating a body
8 with an angled neck as shown in Figures 1 to 5 which is now a popular design for
use with 'jetting' toilet cleansers which are required to get up into the rim of a
toilet bowl. These cleaning products may be very toxic and the assembly of cap and
body is now deemed to require a child-resistant or safety container and manufacturers
in addition require an assembly that is, as in this invention, neat, effective, compact
and economically priced.
[0012] However, our improved safety container according to this invention may also be used
in connection with a body 8 which has a substantially vertical neck as illustrated
by way of example in Figure 6. in which we are illustrating a typical, conventional-shaped,
plastics bottle which has been on the market for some years. As a result of changes
in International legislation, this bottle must only now be fitted with a Child-Resistant
Closure (CRC). To scrap the moulds and start afresh would necessitate crippling (and
largely unbudgeted) expense. Modification of existing bottles in accordance with this
invention will cost no more than a few hundred pounds sterling per bottle mould impression.
Machining into the existing metal mould to form the lugs might take say two days of
work and then the machine can go straight back into production. The same could apply
to the existing cap moulds. New moulds demanded by other systems could cost well over
£50,000 - say £4-5000 per impression.
1. A safety container comprising a screw cap and a container body wherein the container
body has a neck, a mouth at the end of the neck and a screw thread around the outside
of the neck below the mouth and wherein the cap has a relatively short inner skirt
with an internal screw-thread to cooperate with the external screw-thread on the neck
of the container body and a relatively long outer skirt concentrically surrounding
the inner skirt, projections or lugs on the inside of the outer skirt of the cap and
projections or cams on the outside of the container body below the screw-threaded
being provided for engagement with one another when the cap is screwed on to the container
body to prevent removal of the cap until the outer skirt of the cap is squeezed at
oppositely disposed positions away from the points of engagement of the projections
to deform the outer skirt so that the projections are disengaged to permit unscrewing
of the cap.
2. A safety container according to claim 1 wherein there are two oppositely disposed
projections or lugs on the inside of the outer skirt of the cap and two projections
or cams on the outside of the container body.
3. A safety container according to claim 1 or 2 wherein the inner skirt of the cap
is more robust than the outer skirt.
4. A safety container according to any of the preceeding claims wherein the container
body has an angled neck.
5. A screw cap having a relatively short inner skirt with an internal screw-thread
to cooperate with the external screw-thread on the neck of the container body and
a relatively long outer skirt concentrically surrounding the inner skirt and projections
or lugs on the inside of the outer skirt, for use in a container assembly as claimed
in claim 1.