[0001] This invention relates to a method for improving core loss by refining the magnetic
domain wall spacing of electrical steels, particularly electrical steel sheet or strip.
[0002] Grain-oriented silicon steel is conventionally used in electrical applications, such
as power transformers, distribution transformers, generators, and the like. The ability
of the steel to permit cyclic reversals of the applied magnetic field with only limited
energy loss is a most important property. Reductions of this loss, which is termed
"core loss", is desirable.
[0003] In the manufacture of grain-oriented silicon steel, it is known that the Goss secondary
recrystallization texture, (110) [001] in terms of Miller's indices, results in improved
magnetic properties, particularly permeability and core loss over nonoriented silicon
steels. The Goss texture refers to the body-centered cubic lattice comprising the
grain or crystal being oriented in the cube-on-edge position. The texture or grain
orientation of this type has a cube edge parallel to the rolling direction and in
the plane of rolling, with the (110) plane being in the sheet plane. As is well known,
steels having this orientation are characterized by a relatively high permeability
in the rolling direction and a relatively low permeability in a direction at right
angles thereto.
[0004] In the manufacture of grain-oriented silicon steel, typical steps include providing
a melt having of the order of 2-4.5% silicon, casting the melt, hot rolling, cold
rolling the steel to final gauge e.g., of 7 to 14 mils (0.178 to 0.356 mm), typically
of 7 or 9 mils (0.178 or 0.229 mm), with an intermediate annealing when two or more
cold rollings are used, decarburizing the steel, applying a refractory oxide base
coating, such as a magnesium oxide coating, to the steel, and final texture annealing
the steel at elevated temperatures in order to produce the desired secondary recrystallization
and purification treatment to remove impurities such as nitrogen and sulfur. The development
of the cube-on-edge orientation is dependent upon the mechanism of secondary recrystallization
wherein during recrystallization, secondary cube-on-edge oriented grains are preferentially
grown at the expense of primary grains having a different and undesirable orientation.
[0005] As used herein, "sheet" and "strip" are used interchangeably and mean the same unless
otherwise specified.
[0006] It is also known that through the efforts of many prior art workers, cube-on-edge
grain-oriented silicon steels generally fall into two basic categories: first, regular
or conventional grain-oriented silicon steel, and second, high permeability grain-oriented
silicon steel. Regular grain-oriented silicon steel is generally characterized by
permeabilities of less than 1850 at 10 Oersted (796 A/m) with a core loss of greater
than 0.400 watts per pound (WPP) (0.88 watts/kg)at 1.5 Tesla at 60 Hertz for nominally
9-mil (0.229mm) material. High permeability grain-oriented silicon steels are characterized
by higher permeabilities which may be the result of compositional changes alone or
together with process changes. For example, high permeability silicon steels may contain
nitrides, sulfides, and/or borides which contribute to the precipitates and inclusions
of the inhibition system which contributes to the properties of the final steel product.
Furthermore such high permeability silicon steels generally undergo cold reduction
operations to final gauge wherein a final heavy cold reduction of the order of greater
than 80% is made in order to facilitate the grain orientation. While such higher permeability
materials are desirable, such materials tend to produce larger magnetic domains than
conventional material. Generally, larger domains are deleterious to core loss.
[0007] It is known that one of the ways that domain size and thereby core loss values of
electrical steels may be reduced is if the steel is subjected to any of various practices
designed to induce localized strains in the surface of the steel. Such practices may
be generally referred to as "domain refining by scribing" and are performed after
the final high temperature annealing operation. If the steel is scribed after the
final texture annealing, then there is induced a localized stress state in the texture-annealed
sheet so that the domain wall spacing is reduced. These disturbances typically are
relatively narrow, straight lines, or scribes, generally spaced at regular intervals.
The scribe lines are substantially transverse to the rolling direction and typically
are applied to only one side of the steel.
[0008] In fabricating these electrical steels into transformers, the steel inevitably suffers
some deterioration in core loss quality due to cutting, bending, and construction
of cores during fabrication, all of which impart undesirable stresses in the material.
During fabrication incident to the production of stacked core transformers and, more
particularly, in the power transformers of the United States, the deterioration in
core loss quality due to fabrication is not so severe that a stress relief anneal
(SRA) is essential to restore usable properties. For such end uses there is a need
for a flat, domain-refined silicon steel which need not be subjected to stress relief
annealing. In other words, the scribed steel used for this purpose does not have to
possess domain refinement which is heat resistant.
[0009] However, during the fabrication incident to the production of most distribution transformers
in the United States, the steel strip is cut and subjected to various bending and
shaping operations which produce much more worked stresses in the steel than in the
case of power transformers. In such instances, it is necessary and conventional for
manufacturers to stress relief anneal (SRA) the product to relieve such stresses.
During stress relief annealing, it has been found that the beneficial effect on core
loss resulting from some scribing techniques, such as mechanical and thermal scribing,
are lost. For such end uses, it is required and desired that the product exhibit heat
resistant domain refinement (HRDR) in order to retain the improvements in core loss
values resulting from scribing.
[0010] It has been suggested in prior patent art that contaminants or intruders may be effective
in refining the magnetic domain wall spacing or grain-oriented silicon steel. U.S.
Patent 3,990,923 - Takashina et al, dated November 9, 1976, discloses that chemical
treatment may be used on primary recrystallized silicon steel to control or inhibit
the growth of secondary recrystallization grains. British Patent Application 2,167,324A
discloses a method of subdividing magnetic domains of grain-oriented silicon steels
to survive an (SRA). The method includes imparting a strain to the sheet, forming
an intruder on the grain-oriented sheet, the intruder being of a different component
or structure than the electrical sheet and doing so either prior to or after straining
and thereafter annealing such as in a hydrogen reducing atmosphere to result in imparting
the intruders into the steel body. Numerous metals and nonmetals are identified as
suitable intruder materials.
[0011] Japanese Patent Document 61-133321A discloses removing surface coatings from final
texture annealed magnetic steel sheet, forming permeable material coating on the sheet
and heat treating to form material having components or structure different than those
of the steel matrix at intervals which provide heat resistant domain refinement.
[0012] Japanese Patent Document 61-139-679A discloses a process of coating final texture
annealed oriented magnetic steel sheet in the form of linear or spot shapes, at intervals
with at least one compound selected from the group of phosphoric acid, phosphates,
boric acid, borates, sulfates, nitrates, and silicates, and thereafter baking at 300-1200°C,
and forming a penetrated body different from that of the steel to refine the magnetic
domains.
[0013] Japanese Patent Document 61-284529A discloses a method of removing the surface coatings
from final texture annealed magnetic steel sheets at intervals, coating one or more
of zinc, zinc alloys, and zincated alloy at specific coating weights, coating with
one or more of metals having a lower vapor pressure than zinc, forming impregnated
bodies different from the steel in composition or in structure at intervals by heat
treatment or insulating film coating treatment to refine the magnetic domains.
[0014] Japanese Patent Document 62-51202 discloses a process for improving the core loss
of silicon steel by removing the forsterite film formed after final finish annealing,
and adhering different metal, such as copper, nickel, antimony by heating.
[0015] What is needed is a method for refining the magnetic domain wall spacing of grain-oriented
silicon steel, having a base coating e.g., of forsterite, thereon, which is heat resistant.
The method should be compatible with conventional processing of regular and high permeability
silicon steels and should use the thermally insulative coating, e.g., the forsterite
base coating, on the sheet to facilitate the domain refinement. Still further, the
method should be useful with numerous techniques including conventional methods for
removing the base coating in selected patterns
[0016] The invention provides a method and a semi-finished steel sheet or strip product
as defined in the appended claims.
[0017] Broadly, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method for
refining the magnetic domain wall spacing of grain-oriented silicon steel sheet or
strip having an insulation base coating, the method including removing portions of
the base coating to expose a line pattern of the underlying silicon steel, and applying
a metallic contaminant to the silicon steel. The metallic contaminant may be copper,
tin, nickel, zinc or antimony, or combinations or compounds thereof. The exposed steel
is free of thermal and plastic stresses and is not dependent on such stresses to be
effectively domain refined. Thereafter the steel and contaminant thereon are annealed
at time and temperature of 1400 °F (760°C) or more in a protective atmosphere to diffuse
sufficient and controlled amounts of contaminant into the exposed steel to produce
lines of permanent pores to effect heat resistant domain refinement and reduced core
loss in substantially stress-free steel.
[0018] According to an embodiment of the invention a barrier coating of phosphorus or silicate,
or combinations or compounds thereof, is applied to the steel sheet for sealing the
base coating prior to applying said metallic contaminant.
[0019] The invention will be further described with reference to the accompanying drawings,
in which:
Figure 1 is a photomicrograph of a copper-filled groove in the silicon steel base
coating in accordance with the present invention.
Figure 2 is a 150X photograph of an X-ray map of copper of Figure 1.
Figure 3 is a 3000X photomicrograph of a silicon steel after diffusion anneal showing
porosity in accordance with the present invention.
Figure 4 is a 30X photomicrograph illustrating nodules of antimony on a steel surface.
Figures 5 and 6 are photomicrographs in cross section on Ni-Sn strip.
Figures 7 to 10 are 3000X photographs of X-ray maps of nickel, tin, phosphorus, and
iron in the Ni-Sn strip in the steel.
[0020] Broadly, the method of the present invention relates to a method for refinement of
the domain structure of grain-oriented silicon steel sheet having relatively large
grain sizes by controlled surface chemical contamination. The method takes final textured
annealed silicon steel as the starting sheet material, having the electrically and
thermally insulating base coating in place, and then by any of numerous techniques,
locally removes the coating to expose the bare metal. No plastic strain or stress
of any sort needs to be imposed on the metal and thereafter the exposed bare metal
is contaminated by other materials on the areas of the exposed metal pattern. The
steel is then annealed to diffuse or alloy the contaminant into the iron-silicon steel
sheet product. The resulting domain refinement is heat resistant as it survives stress
relief annealing.
[0021] The starting material for the chemical striping process of the present invention
is final textured annealed grain-oriented silicon steel having an insulative coating
in place. Such an insulative coating can be the conventional base coating, also called
forsterite or mill glass coating. Preferably, the as-scrubbed final texture annealed
grain-oriented silicon steels may be used. Such steels may be of the regular or conventional
grain-oriented silicon steels or of high permeability grain-oriented silicon steels.
The particular compositions of such steels are not critical to the present invention
and they may be conventional compositions. As used herein the steel melts initially
contained the nominal composition as follows:
| |
C |
N |
Mn |
S |
Si |
Cu |
B |
Fe |
| Steel 1 |
.030 |
<50ppm |
.038 |
.017 |
3.15 |
.30 |
10ppm |
Bal. |
| Steel 2 |
.030 |
50ppm |
.07 |
.022 |
3.15 |
.22 |
-- |
Bal. |
| Steel 3 |
.038 |
45ppm |
.078 |
.026 |
3.25 |
.25 |
5-6ppm |
Bal. |
[0022] Steel 1 is a high permeability grain-oriented silicon steel and Steel 2 is a conventional
grain-oriented silicon steel and Steel 3 is a modified conventional grain-oriented
silicon steel. As used herein, all compositions are by weight percent, unless otherwise
specified.
[0023] Steels 1, 2 and 3 were produced by casting, hot rolling, normalizing, cold rolling
to final gauge with an intermediate annealing when two or more cold rolling stages
were used, decarburizing, coating with MgO, and final texture annealing to achieve
the desired secondary recrystallization of cube-on-edge orientation. After decarburizing
the steel, a refractory oxide base coating containing primarily magnesium oxide was
applied before final texture annealing at elevated temperature; such annealing caused
a reaction at the steel surface to create a forsterite base coating. Although the
steel melts of Steels 1, 2, and 3 initially contained the nominal compositions recited
above, after final texture annealing, the C, N and S were reduced to trace levels
of less than about 0.001% by weight.
[0024] In accordance with the present invention, it is important that portions of the coating
be removed to expose a line or stripe pattern in the underlying silicon steel. How
the coating is removed is not critical to the present invention except that the underlying
steel need not be subjected to any mechanical, thermal, or other stresses and strains
as a result of the coating removal operation. In other words, the exposed steel must
be free of any thermal and plastic stresses prior to any subsequent steps of applying
the metallic contaminant. An advantage of the present invention is that any of various
techniques may be used to remove the selected portions of the base coating. For example,
conventional mechanical scribing or laser means may be used to develop a controlled
pattern of markings on the strip surface. The line or stripe pattern selected for
the removed base coating may be conventional patterns used in prior art scribing techniques.
Preferably, the pattern may comprise removing the coating in generally parallel lines
substantially transverse to the rolling direction of the steel having a line width
and spacing as may be conventional. Other patterns may also be useful, depending on
whether the grain-oriented silicon steel is of the cube-on-edge, cube-on-face, or
other orientation.
[0025] In accordance with the present invention, the exposed silicon steel would be plated
or coated by selected metals and metal alloys. Preferably the metals are selected
such that they have a diffusion rate slower than iron in silicon steels. The metals
and metal alloys suitable for the present invention are referred to as contaminant
or diffuser materials. As used herein, "contaminant" refers to those certain suitable
metal and metal alloys selectively applied to the exposed areas of steel sheet in
accordance with this invention. It has been found that various metallic contaminants
may be used selected from copper, tin, nickel, zinc or antimony, or combinations or
compounds thereof. The metallic contaminants may be applied as a coating to the silicon
steel using various conventional means such as electroless deposition or electrolytic
plating. Because of the insulative nature of the base coating, the metallic contaminant
can only be applied in the selected line pattern or stripes which conform to the pattern
of base coating removal. What is important at this point is that the base glass insulation
on the silicon steel facilitates selective deposition of the metallic contaminant
in the predetermined or preselected pattern.
[0026] The silicon steel having the selected portions of base coating removed and having
the metallic contaminant applied is thereafter annealed at a time and temperature
in a protective atmosphere to diffuse sufficient and controlled amounts of contaminant
into the exposed steel to produce permanent pores to effect heat resistant domain
refinement and reduced core loss. The annealing has the effect of a diffusion anneal
to cause minor alloying of the metallic contaminant with the iron-silicon steel sheet
to effect heat resistant domain refinement. The annealing temperature ranges from
about 1400°F (760°C) or more and may range up to 2100°F (1150°C). Preferably, the
temperatures range up to 1800°F (982°C) and more preferably, from about 1400 to 1700°F
(760 to 927°C).
[0027] It is desirable that the anneal temperature be at least equal to or greater than
the temperature that would normally be used for a stress relief anneal in order that
the property effects developed would be stable with respect to any subsequent lower
temperature treatment such as a stress relief anneal (SRA). In other words, the improvements
in core loss would be the result of heat resistant domain refinement. The time for
the anneal may range up to 20 hours and preferably may range from 30 minutes to 5
hours at a temperature sufficient to produce the magnetic domain refining. As a practical
consideration, the diffusion anneal should be higher than a conventional stress relief
anneal of about 1425°F (774°C) which may be used by transformer manufacturers following
fabrication. Temperatures of the order of up to 1650°F (899°C) are sufficient to effect
the heat resistant domain refinement without requiring an additional separator coating
to prevent adjacent coil laps from thermally welding together during the annealing.
Lower temperature anneals may also be successful.
[0028] As is known, substantially complete homogeneity is a highly desirable condition for
soft magnetic materials. It has been found that proper time and temperature develops
and stabilizes the permanent pores and further diffuses the contaminants into the
steel to provide a substantially homogeneous steel sheet throughout the steel thickness.
Generally, annealing at the higher temperatures facilitates homogeneity. For all annealing
in accordance with the present invention, the strip may be annealed either in coil
form or as a strand anneal of the continuously moving strip following the application
of the metallic contaminant.
[0029] In order to better understand the present invention, the following examples are presented.
Unless otherwise stated, the metallic contaminants used in the examples hereof were
selected from the plating solutions described in Table I and were electrolytically
plated.
TABLE I
| Plating Metal |
Solutions and Conditions |
| Tin |
Stannous Sulfate 80 gm/l |
| |
Sulfuric Acid 52 ml/l |
| |
Ambient Temperature |
| |
Stainless or Tin Anodes |
| |
*.125 A/in² (1.94 A/dm²); 1 min. |
| Nickel |
Nickel Sulfate 328 gm/l |
| |
Nickel Chloride 60 gm/l |
| |
Boric Acid 211 gm/l |
| |
Temperature 130°F |
| |
Nickel Anodes |
| |
*.25 A/in² (3.88 A/dm²); 15-30 secs. |
| Copper |
Copper Cyanide 24 gm/l |
| |
Sodium Cyanide 39 gm/l |
| |
Sodium Hydroxide 39 gm/l |
| |
Ambient Temperature |
| |
Copper Anodes |
| |
*.25 A/in² (3.88 A/dm²); 30-60 secs. |
| Zinc |
Zinc Sulfate 375 gm/l |
| |
Ammonium Chloride 16 gm/l |
| |
Temperature 100°F |
| |
Stainless Anodes |
| |
*.25 A/in² (3.88 A/dm²); 30 secs. |
| Ni-Sn |
Stannous Chloride 53 gm/l |
| |
Nickel Chloride 328 gm/l |
| |
Ammonium Bifluoride 62 gm/l |
| |
Ammonium Hydroxide (to give pH 2.5) |
| |
Temperature 150°F |
| |
Stainless or Nickel Anodes |
| |
*0.2 A/in² (3.1 A/dm²); 1½ mins. |
| Antimony |
Antimony Oxide 60 gm/l |
| |
Hydrofluoric Acid (48%) 120 ml/l |
| |
Beta-napthol 1 eyedrop/l |
| |
Ambient Temperature |
| |
Stainless Anodes |
| |
*.07 A/in² (1.09 A/dm²); 2 mins. |
| *Current density pertains to total strip area. |
Example I
[0030] Two Epstein packs of nominally 8-mil (0.2mm) high permeability grain-oriented silicon
steel sheet having the composition of steel 1 were mechanically scribed in the as-scrubbed
condition. The scribing effectively removed portions of the base coating in a pattern
of substantially parallel lines substantially transverse to the rolling direction
of the steel strip. Each Epstein pack had twelve (12) strips, and each strip was 3
cm wide and had the scribe lines spaced at about 5 mm intervals. Immediately following
the mechanical scribing, a stress relief anneal at 1500°F (816°C) for two hours was
performed. The samples were then electrolytically plated with copper using the copper
solution described in Table I and subsequently annealed at 1650°F (899°C) for 5 hours
in a protective atmosphere to diffuse the metallic contaminant into the silicon steel
sheet body. Percentages in parentheses indicate change compared to initial properties.
The magnetic properties were determined in a conventional manner for Epstein packs.
TABLE II
| Epstein Pack |
Initial As-Scrubbed |
Mechanically Scribed |
2 hr. at 1500°F Stress-Relief Anneal |
Chemically-Striped (Copper) + 1650°/5 hr. Anneal |
| |
Permeability |
Core Loss |
Permeability |
Core Loss |
Permeability |
Core Loss |
Permeability |
Core Loss |
| |
@10H |
@1.5T |
@1.7T |
@10H |
@1.5T |
@1.7T |
@10H |
@1.5T |
@1.7T |
@10H |
@1.5T |
@1.7T |
| |
|
(wpp) |
(wpp |
|
(wpp) |
(wpp) |
|
(wpp) |
(wpp) |
|
(wpp) |
(wpp) |
| B |
1935 |
.417 |
.561 |
1932 |
.359 |
.489 |
1935 |
.416 |
.559 |
1933 |
.388 |
.525 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(-7%) |
(-6%) |
| C |
1938 |
.416 |
.556 |
1935 |
.356 |
.481 |
1937 |
.410 |
.551 |
1936 |
.391 |
.529 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(-6%) |
(-5%) |
[0031] As shown by the data in Table II, the mechanical scribing resulted in some core loss
improvement as would be expected, resulting from some plastic deformation damage to
the underlying silicon steel. Such improvement was not thermally stable and after
the 1500°F (816°C) stress relief anneal the plastic deformation was removed and the
properties returned substantially to their initial unscribed values of the base-coated
final texture annealed silicon steel. The steel exhibited only the pattern of exposed
underlying metal. The chemical striping treatment in accordance with the present invention
with copper followed by the diffusion anneal at 1650°F (899°C) shows a significant
core loss improvement averaging about 6% and clearly demonstrates the chemical striping
of the present invention can be effective independent of any plastic or thermal stress
or deformation of the steel. Furthermore, following a subsequent stress relief anneal
at 1450°F (788°C) for 2 hours, the samples demonstrate a permanent core loss improvement
indicating a heat-resistant domain refinement in each sample. Such samples confirm
that thermal or plastic deformation of the exposed silicon steel plays no role in
heat resistant domain refinement.
[0032] Figure 1 is a Scanning Electron Microscope photomicrograph of a groove, i.e. the
silicon steel exposed through the base coating, filled with copper after plating the
sample with copper. Figure 2 is a 150X photograph of an x-ray map showing copper in
the line pattern of the silicon steel sample.
Example II
[0033] Single-strip Epstein samples 8 mils (0.2mm) thick by 3 cm wide of the steel composition
of Example I were subjected to a chemical pickling in HCℓ-1% HF acid to remove all
of the insulative base coating from the texture annealed strips. A plastic stencil
with slits was attached to the steel surface, such that the pattern of slits formed
substantially parallel lines substantially transverse to the rolling direction of
the steel strip as in Example I. Each sample with the stencil thereon was electroplated
with copper as described in Example I, and then annealed at 1650°F (899°C) for 2 hours
(with the stencil removed) to diffuse the metallic contaminant into the silicon steel
body. Percentages in parentheses indicate changes compared to original properties.
The magnetic properties were determined in a conventional manner for single strip
tests.
TABLE III
| Sample No. |
Original Properties |
Chemically-Striped with copper + 2 hr./1650°F anneal |
| |
Permeability |
Core Loss |
Permeability |
Core Loss |
| |
@10H |
@1.5T |
@1.7T |
@10H |
@1.5T |
@1.7T |
| 160/163/9 |
1912 |
.437 |
.544 |
1913 |
.385 |
.525 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-12%) |
(-3%) |
| 160/163/10 |
1935 |
.449 |
.579 |
1946 |
.422 |
.567 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-6%) |
(-2%) |
| 160/163/11 |
1921 |
.495 |
.634 |
1939 |
.442 |
.587 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-11%) |
(-8%) |
[0034] Results shown in Table III show considerably improved properties of core loss after
the diffusion anneal although the samples at no stage were subjected to a plastic
deformation or stress. The improved properties demonstrate unequivocally that plastic
deformation plays no role in domain refining by chemical striping in accordance with
the present invention.
[0035] A metallographic examination of various samples in the diffusion-annealed zone showed
no extensive attack of the substrate steel by the plated deposit which is consistent
with the small amount of contaminant deposited and the relatively low diffusion temperatures
used. Structures at high magnification tended to be varied and complicated as is not
unusual in diffusion-couple metallurgy. The data suggest that the domain refinement
of the present invention is not dependent on development and/or preservation of subtle
composition gradients within the chemically striped or treated region. Rather, it
appears that the effect is the Kirkendall porosity phenomenon which is well known
in diffusion-couple metallurgy. Although there is no intent to be bound by theory,
the Kirkendall related mechanism appears to suggest that contaminants of a different
chemical nature can be successfully used as chemical stripe contaminants and that
the precise chemical character is not as important as the diffusion rate with respect
to the iron base material. Furthermore, in keeping with Kirkendall diffusion theory,
it appears that lower diffusion temperatures would tend to exaggerate the Kirkendall
porosity and that preferably the subsequent annealing should occur within the lower
range of 1400 to 1700°F (760 to 927°C).
Example III
[0036] Single strips of a high permeability grain-oriented silicon steel of the steel described
in Examples I and II were mechanically scribed or in some cases electrically discharge
scribed in the as-scrubbed condition. The scribing effectively removed portions of
the base coating in a pattern of substantially parallel lines substantially transverse
to the rolling direction of the steel strip. The lines were about 3 mm wide on single
strip 8-mil (0.2 mm) Epstein samples and spaced at about 5 mm intervals The samples
were then electrolytically plated with various metallic contaminants from the plating
solutions listed in Table I. the plating resulted in the grooves in the base coating
being at least half filled with the metallic contaminant, as judged under a microscope.
After plating, the samples were diffusion annealed as indicated in a substantially
hydrogen atmosphere.
TABLE IV
| Sample No. |
Original Properties |
Chemically-Striped |
Metal |
Anneal |
| |
Permeability |
Core Loss |
Permeability |
Core Loss |
|
Time |
Temperature |
| |
@10H |
@1.5T |
@1.7T |
@10H |
@1.5T |
@1.7T |
|
(hrs) |
(°F) |
| |
|
(wpp) |
(wpp) |
|
(wpp) |
(wpp) |
|
|
|
| B13 |
1875 |
.447 |
.658 |
1875 |
.433 |
.644 |
Sn |
4 |
1475 |
| B15 |
1911 |
.448 |
.649 |
1910 |
.406 |
.590 |
Sn |
4 |
1475 |
| B16 |
1899 |
.448 |
.641 |
1896 |
.410 |
.610 |
Sn |
4 |
1475 |
| P1-10 |
1865 |
.473 |
.721 |
1885 |
.455 |
.644 |
Ni |
1 |
1600 |
| P1-11 |
1858 |
.496 |
.766 |
1849 |
.476 |
.733 |
Ni |
1 |
1600 |
| P1-12 |
1893 |
.494 |
.712 |
1829 |
.480 |
.650 |
Ni |
3 |
1600 |
| D-3 |
1909 |
.434 |
.610 |
1902 |
.398 |
.593 |
Sb |
6 |
1650 |
| D-4 |
1910 |
.471 |
.694 |
1911 |
.459 |
.670 |
Sb |
6 |
1650 |
| D-5 |
1918 |
.455 |
.668 |
1911 |
.442 |
.653 |
Sb |
6 |
1650 |
| D-6 |
1914 |
.424 |
.674 |
1911 |
.439 |
.631 |
Sb |
6 |
1650 |
| K-2 |
1912 |
.441 |
.655 |
1911 |
.417 |
.627 |
Zn |
3.5 |
1650 |
| K-3 |
1908 |
.416 |
.568 |
1907 |
.389 |
.564 |
Zn |
3.5 |
1650 |
| K-12 |
1933 |
.418 |
.586 |
1924 |
.390 |
.551 |
Zn |
3.5 |
1650 |
| K-16 |
1923 |
.432 |
.607 |
1923 |
.393 |
.584 |
Zn |
3.5 |
1650 |
| J-18 |
1916 |
.394 |
.534 |
1914 |
.380 |
.519 |
Ni-Sn |
3.5 |
1650 |
| K-5 |
1893 |
.400 |
.593 |
1892 |
.376 |
.546 |
Ni-Sn |
3.5 |
1650 |
| K-14 |
1920 |
.414 |
.579 |
1921 |
.375 |
.520 |
Ni-Sn |
3.5 |
1650 |
| L-7 |
1914 |
.423 |
.613 |
1914 |
.396 |
.546 |
Ni-Sn |
3.5 |
1650 |
[0037] As the data show in Table IV, for the tin, nickel, and antimony contaminants provided
by the plating solutions and conditions set forth in Table I, the steels exhibited
improvement in core loss properties at both 1.5 and 1.7 Tesla with little or no loss
in permeability. Since the samples were heated at temperature above typical 1425°F
(774°C) stress relief annealing, the core loss improvements were permanent with respect
to heating at that temperature. In other words, the improvements were "heat proof".
Example IV
[0038] Additional samples were tested to measure the thermal stability of the magnetic properties
of samples treated in accordance with the present invention. If the magnetic property
improvement is a result of Kirkendall porosity, then these improvements should exhibit
exceptional stability. All of the samples are 8 or 12 strip Epstein packs. Each strip
of nominally 8-mil (0.2mm) steel of composition of Example I, was prepared by lightly
mechanically scratching through the thin base glass to expose bare steel and was electroplated
with the metals shown in Table V with lines about 0.25 mm wide and spaced at about
5 mm intervals. The strips were then stacked and then annealed at 1650°F (899°C) for
5 hours for diffusion. A considerable improvement in core loss properties was evident.
The Epstein packs were then subjected to a further anneal at 2100°F (1150°C) for 2
hours or 10 hours as indicated. Percentages in parentheses indicate change compared
to initial properties.
TABLE V
| Sample No. |
Initial Properties |
Chemically-Striped with 1650°F/5 hr. Anneal |
After Further Anneal at 2100°F |
| |
Permeability |
Core Loss |
Permeability |
Core Loss |
Permeability |
Core Loss |
| |
@10H |
@1.5T |
@1.7T |
@10H |
@1.5T |
@1.7T |
@10H |
@1.5T |
@1.7T |
| |
|
(wpp) |
(wpp) |
|
(wpp) |
(wpp) |
|
(wpp) |
(wpp) |
| Zinc Stripe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 160-6/3 |
1931 |
.420 |
.590 |
1930 |
.378 |
.519 |
**1912 |
.369 |
.508 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-10%) |
(-12%) |
|
(-12%) |
(-14%) |
| Nickel-Tin Stripe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 160-6/4 |
1916 |
.414 |
.588 |
1929 |
.369 |
.506 |
**1911 |
.370 |
.511 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-11%) |
(-14%) |
|
(-11%) |
(-13%) |
| Copper Stripe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 160-6/1 |
1920 |
.422 |
.577 |
1926 |
.369 |
.494 |
**1916 |
.381 |
.513 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-13%) |
(-14%) |
|
(-10%) |
(-11%) |
| W |
1926 |
.435 |
.584 |
1918 |
.393 |
.530 |
*1977 |
.406 |
.547 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-10%) |
(-9%) |
|
(-7%) |
(-6%) |
| X |
1926 |
.428 |
.572 |
1885 |
.395 |
.551 |
*1923 |
.414 |
.551 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-9%) |
(-4%) |
|
(-3%) |
(-4%) |
| Y |
1908 |
.460 |
.629 |
1896 |
.413 |
.569 |
*1909 |
.425 |
.583 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-10%) |
(-10%) |
|
(-8%) |
(-7%) |
| Z |
1921 |
.474 |
.626 |
1874 |
.410 |
.591 |
*1915 |
.417 |
.562 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-14%) |
(-6% |
|
(-12%) |
(-10%) |
| **Sample annealed 10 hrs. at 2100°F |
| *Sample anneled 2 hrs. at 2100°F |
[0039] The data and results of Table V show that the core loss improvement persisted up
to 2100°F (1150°C) which demonstrates the unique and exceptional stability of the
domain refining of the present invention. Furthermore, the Scanning Electron Microscope
(SEM) chemical analysis by X-ray showed that the previously chemical striped areas
were now of the same composition as the matrix steel. In other words, the high temperature
had homogenized the strip and the contaminant was no longer localized but part of
the overall residual impurity in the bulk of the sample. The homogeneity and low stress
state of the soft magnetic material is a desired result.
[0040] In view of the discoveries of the present invention, it is believed that the metal
contaminants chosen will perform as expected if the diffusion rates are slower than
the self-diffusion rate of iron in the ferrous base alloy. Furthermore, the slower
the rate of the diffusion through iron, the more suitable the metal may be as a contaminant
to produce the permanent porosity. For example, copper is of the order of 4 times
slower than iron in diffusion through iron. Nickel is of the order of 500 times slower.
Such metallic elements having slower diffusion rates in iron should result in the
Kirkendall porosity phenomenon and the benefits of the present invention.
[0041] Although the metallic contaminants can provide heat resistant domain refinement resulting
from domain refinement of unstressed grain-oriented silicon-irons having a good base
coating thereon, reproduceability was poor in those cases where the base coating was
inadequate. It appears that the naturally-occurring forsterite base coating which
results from the final texture annealing sometimes permits spurious plating of the
metal contaminant through pores and cracks in the forsterite. Such was evident when
nodules of antimony, for example, were found appearing and growing directly out of
pores in the forsterite base coating in areas located away from the exposed underlying
silicon steel and between the substantially parallel lines as shown in Figure 4.
[0042] It has been found that, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the use
of an additional sealant coating or barrier coating applied to the forsterite before
applying the metallic contaminant to the exposed silicon steel stripes results in
a striking improvement in consistency and reproduceability to effect heat resistant
domain refinement The main purpose of introducing the barrier coating in the process
is to seal the pores and cracks in the forsterite coating. Table VI identifies several
coatings which are believed to be useful in acting as a barrier coating in accordance
with the present invention. The similarity between all of these coatings is that they
are all water soluble and cure at relatively low temperatures. Furthermore, these
barriers coatings contain phosphorus or silicates, or combinations or compounds thereof
as the primary constituent of the coating. Preferably the coating primary constituent
is a metal phosphate or metal silicate, and more preferably, the coating should be
one that when cured sets up essentially as a magnesium phosphate layer.
TABLE VI
| Designation |
Barrier Coating and Conditions |
Concentration |
| SC |
Phosphoric Acid (85%) |
202 gm/l |
| |
Magnesium Oxide |
22 gm/l |
| |
Nalcoag (1050) |
318 ml/l |
| |
Chromic Trioxide |
46 gm/l |
| |
Water |
Balance |
| |
Cured: 1000°F (538oC) - 1 min.(air) |
|
| CS |
Sodium Silicate (40-42 Be) |
500 ml/l |
| |
Water |
Balance |
| |
Cured: 800°F (427oC) - 1 min.(air) |
|
| PS |
Phosphoric Acid (85%) |
120 gm/l |
| |
Magnesium Oxide |
18 gm/l |
| |
Kasil #1 |
22 gm/l |
| |
Ammonium Hydroxide (58%) |
21 ml/l |
| |
Chromic Trioxide |
.34 gm/l |
| |
Dupanol (2%) |
1.0 ml/l |
| |
Water |
Balance |
| |
Cured: 800°F (427oC) - 1 min.(air) |
|
| P |
Phosphoric Acid (85%) |
118 gm/l |
| |
Magnesium Oxide |
18 gm/l |
| |
Ammonium Hydroxide (58%) |
20 ml/l |
| |
Chromic Trioxide |
.34 gm/l |
| |
Dupanol (2%) |
1.0 ml/l |
| |
Water |
Balance |
| |
Cured: 800°F (427oC) -1min.(air) |
|
[0043] In order to better understand the present embodiment the following further examples
are presented.
Example V
[0044] Tests were performed to demonstrate the effect of the barrier coating on enhancing
the heat resistant domain refinement process. All of the samples were obtained from
various heats of nominally 8-mil (0.2mm) gauge silicon steel having the typical composition
of Steel 1. Single strips of Steel 1 were mechanically scribed into the as-scribed
condition. The scribing effectively removed portions of the base coating in a pattern
of substantially parallel lines substantially transverse to the rolling direction
of the steel strip. The lines were about 0.25 mm wide and spaced at about 5 mm intervals.
Each sample was then coated with barrier coating "P" from Table VI after the step
of removing the base coating. All of the samples were thereafter electroplated with
either zinc or copper from the plating solution listed in Table I. The magnetic properties
are Epstein single strip results from strips of 30 x 3 cm. After electroplating, all
of the samples were subjected to a diffusion annealing step at time and temperature
set forth in Table VII. Percentages indicate change in core loss properties compared
to original properties. The magnetic properties were determined in a conventional
manner for single strip tests.
TABLE VII
| |
Original Properties |
After 5 hr/1650°F Diffusion Anneal |
After 10 hr/1650oF Diffusion Anneal |
| |
Permeability |
Core Loss |
|
Permeability |
Core Loss |
Permeability |
Core Loss |
| |
@10H |
@1.5T |
@1.7T |
|
|
@10H |
@1.5T |
cf. |
@1.7T |
cf. |
@10H |
@1.5T |
cf. |
@1.7T |
cf. |
| |
|
(wpp) |
(wpp) |
|
|
|
(wpp) |
Change |
(wpp) |
Change |
|
(wpp) |
Change |
(wpp) |
Change |
| |
|
|
|
Contaminant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| G1 |
1935 |
.430 |
.585 |
Zinc |
1940 |
.386 |
-10% |
.523 |
-11% |
1940 |
.386 |
-10% |
.530 |
- 9% |
| G5 |
1922 |
.420 |
.636 |
|
|
1908 |
.406 |
- 3% |
.592 |
- 7% |
1946 |
.413 |
- 2% |
.607 |
- 5% |
| L9 |
1907 |
.412 |
.604 |
|
|
1910 |
.358 |
-13% |
.512 |
-15% |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| G3 |
1922 |
.499 |
.677 |
Copper |
1923 |
.430 |
-14% |
.579 |
-14% |
1924 |
.463 |
- 7% |
.623 |
- 8% |
| G7 |
1932 |
.525 |
.700 |
|
|
1934 |
.442 |
-16% |
.598 |
-14% |
1938 |
.405 |
-23% |
.545 |
-22% |
| F9 |
1952 |
.446 |
.628 |
|
|
1951 |
.417 |
- 7% |
.602 |
- 4% |
1954 |
.396 |
-11% |
.573 |
- 9% |
| K13 |
1904 |
.478 |
.666 |
|
|
1909 |
.421 |
-12% |
.598 |
-10% |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| J2 |
1938 |
.473 |
.625 |
|
|
1932 |
.391 |
-17% |
.536 |
-14% |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| Average Improvement (all strips) |
|
|
|
-12% |
|
-11% |
|
|
-11% |
|
-10% |
[0045] When compared with the control samples which were magnetically tested as received
before any treatment, Table VII presents data which shows that most of the samples
had an attractive improvement in core loss averaging of the order of 10 to 12%. For
comparison purposes, samples from the same batches of material were capable of providing
15-20% improvement in core losses by conventional mechanical scribing techniques.
A further advantage of the present invention is that such improvement in core loss
may be the result of heat resistant domain refinement.
Example VI
[0046] By way of further examples, additional tests were performed to demonstrate the domain
refining process on different silicon steels having compositions of Steels 1, 2 and
3 for Epstein test packs. Each sample is prepared in a manner similar to that in the
previous Example V, with required modifications to produce the different grain-oriented
silicon steels at nominally 7-mil (0.18mm) or 8-mil (0.2mm) gauge, thereafter processed
in accordance with the previous example under the experimental conditions described
in Table VIII with parallel bands of treated regions about 5 mm apart. The magnetic
properties were determined in a conventional manner for Epstein packs.

[0047] The data of Table VIII show that the domain refining process of the present invention
can reduce the core loss in 8-mil (0.2mm) gauge material of Steel 1 by up to 11% when
compared to initial properties. The best improvement was obtained with the contaminant
copper. The core loss is 7-mil [0.18mm) 1 material of Steel 2 was reduced by about
5° at 1.5T and by 5% at 1.7T. The core loss in 7-mil (0.18mm) material of Steel 3
was reduced by about 7% at 1.5T and by about 4% at 1.7T.
Example VII
[0048] Further tests were performed to compare the results of domain refining with and without
a barrier coating on silicon steel having the composition of Steel 1 for single strip
Epsteins. Each sample was prepared in a manner similar to that in Example V. The strips
were mechanically scratched to remove the thin base coating in a pattern of substantially
parallel lines transverse to the rolling direction. For those samples so marked, the
barrier coating "P" was applied after removing the lines of base coating. All the
samples were thereafter electroplated with nickel or nickel-tin as indicated in Table
IX from the appropriate plating solution of Table I and subjected to a diffusion anneal
at time and temperature of 1 to 5 hours at 1600 to 1650°F (871 to 899°C) in hydrogen.
The magnetic properties are Epstein single strip results of nominally 8-mil (0.2 mm)
strip of 30 x 3 cm. Percentages in parentheses indicate change compared to original
properties.
TABLE IX
| Not Barrier Coated |
| Nickel Chemical Stripe |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sample # |
Original Properties |
Chemical Stripe + Diffusion Anneal |
| |
Permeability |
Core Loss |
|
|
|
|
| |
µ10H |
@1.5T |
@1.7T |
µ10H |
@1.5T |
@1.7T |
| |
|
(wpp) |
(wpp) |
|
(wpp) |
(wpp) |
| P1-10 |
1865 |
.473 |
.721 |
1885 |
.455 |
.644 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-4) |
(-11) |
| P1-11 |
1858 |
.496 |
.766 |
1849 |
.476 |
.733 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-4) |
(-4) |
| P1-12 |
1893 |
.494 |
.712 |
1879 |
.480 |
.650 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-3) |
(-9) |
| Average |
1872 |
.488 |
.733 |
1871 |
.470 |
.676 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-4%) |
(-8%) |
| Nickel-Tin Chemical Stripe |
|
|
|
|
|
| J-18 |
1916 |
.394 |
.534 |
1914 |
.380 |
.519 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-4) |
(-3) |
| K-5 |
1893 |
.400 |
.595 |
1892 |
.376 |
.546 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-6) |
(-8) |
| K-14 |
1920 |
.414 |
.579 |
1921 |
.375 |
.520 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-9) |
(-10) |
| L-7 |
1914 |
.423 |
.613 |
1914 |
.396 |
.546 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-6) |
(-11) |
| Average |
1911 |
.408 |
.580 |
1910 |
.383 |
.533 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-6%) |
(-8%) |
| Barrier Coated |
| Nickel Chemical Stripe |
|
|
|
|
|
| N-41/5 |
1917 |
.470 |
.646 |
1867 |
.398 |
.555 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-15) |
(-14) |
| N-41/10 |
1918 |
.433 |
.594 |
1843 |
.379 |
.525 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-12) |
(-12) |
| N-41/4 |
1899 |
.469 |
.657 |
1844 |
.427 |
.620 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-9) |
(-6) |
| Average |
1911 |
.457 |
.632 |
1851 |
.401 |
.567 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-12%) |
(-10%) |
| Nickel-Tin Chemical Stripe |
|
|
|
|
|
| G2 |
1940 |
.419 |
.567 |
1932 |
.363 |
.502 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-13) |
(-11) |
| G6 |
1936 |
.489 |
.665 |
1936 |
.428 |
.574 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-12) |
(-14) |
| L4 |
1894 |
.443 |
.659 |
1896 |
.392 |
.561 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-12) |
(-15) |
| L9 |
1907 |
.412 |
.604 |
1910 |
.358 |
.512 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-13) |
(-15) |
| Average |
1919 |
.441 |
.624 |
1919 |
.385 |
.537 |
| |
|
|
|
|
(-13%) |
(-14%) |
[0049] The data of Table IX clearly shows the benefits of the present invention. For comparable
samples, the barrier coated samples improved the consistency and reproductibility
of the results. All the barrier coated samples had better core loss values than comparable
samples which were not so coated. Furthermore, none of the barrier coated samples
exhibited any nodules of metallic contaminant on the surface of the sample in areas
located away from the exposed pattern line. This finding indicated that the barrier
coating had blocked any pores or cracks in the base-glass coating which could have
exposed bare metal which would have been plated with the contaminant.
[0050] In the course of such experiments, it was unexpectedly found that the barrier coating
not only seals the pores and cracks in the base coating of the grain-oriented silicon
steel, but it also acts synergistically with the major contaminant in the striped
area of the steel during and after the diffusion anneal. Particularly, it is noted
that with zinc or nickel-tin as the major contaminant, phosphorus was evident in the
permanent defect produced in the steel.
[0051] Metallographic examination of various samples in the diffusion annealed zone showed
no extensive attack of the substrate steel by the plated deposit which is consistent
with the small amount of contaminant deposited and the relatively low diffusion temperatures
employed. Structures at high magnification tended to be varied and complicated as
is not usual in diffusion-couple metallurgy. Confirmation of interdiffusion between
the steel and the contaminant as well as the steel, the contaminant, and phosphorus
is shown in Figures 5 to 10. In Figure 5, a cross section at 375X through the Ni-Sn
stripe after a two-hour diffusion anneal at 1650°F (899°C) shows nodules on the surface
of the steel. Figure 6 shows the same nodule at 3000X. Figures 7, 8, 9 and 10 clearly
display by scanning Electron Microscope X-ray mapping the intrusion of nickel, tin
phosphorus, and iron into the diffusion zone.
[0052] As was an object of the present invention, a method has been developed for providing
heat resistant domain refinement for grain-oriented silicon steels to improve the
core loss values. A further advantage of the method of the present invention is the
ability to remove portions of the base coating to expose a pattern of the underlying
silicon steel such as in lines substantially transverse to the rolling direction by
any conventional or unconventional means provided that the steel exposed through the
base coating is free from thermal and plastic stresses. The barrier coating enhances
the core loss improvements and the reproduceability of such improvements. An advantage
of the present invention is that a semifinished sheet product having a barrier coating
and metallic contaminant can be produced for subsequent annealing by the customer
before or after fabricating into transformer cores.
1. A method for refining the magnetic domain wall spacing of grain-oriented silicon
steel sheet or strip having an insulation base coating thereon, characterized in the
method comprising:
removing portions of the base coating to expose a line pattern of the underlying silicon
steel;
applying a metallic contaminant to the exposed silicon steel, the metallic contaminant
having a diffusion rate lower than iron in the silicon steel, the exposed steel being
free of thermal and plastic stresses;
thereafter annealing the steel and contaminant thereon at time and temperature of
1400°F (760°C) or more in a protective atmosphere to diffuse sufficient and controlled
amounts of contaminant into the exposed steel to produce lines of permanent pores
and so effect heat resistant domain refinement and reduced core loss of substantially
stress-free steel.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the step of annealing the steel and contaminant
thereon includes at time and temperatures up to 1800°F (982°C) to produce lines of
permanent pores stable up to 2100°F (1149°C).
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the step of annealing the steel and
contaminant thereon includes at time and temperature of from 1400 to 1700°F (760°
to 927°C) to develop and stabilize the permanent pores.
4. A method according to claim 1, wherein the step of annealing the steel and contaminant
thereon includes at time and temperatures up to 2100°F (1149°C) to further diffuse
the contaminants into the steel to provide a substantially homogeneous steel sheet
throughout the steel thickness.
5. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the step of removing
portions of the base coating is performed before applying the metallic contaminant.
6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the metallic contaminant is applied at least
in the areas of exposed steel.
7. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the metallic contaminant
is copper, tin, nickel, zinc or antimony, or combinations or compounds thereof.
8. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the step of annealing
uses a protective atmosphere of hydrogen or nitrogen or mixtures thereof.
9. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, further comprising, prior
to applying said metallic contaminant, applying to the base coated steel a barrier
coating having a primary constituent of phosphorus or silicate, or combinations or
compounds thereof, for sealing the base coatings.
10. A method according to claim 9, wherein the step of applying the barrier coating
is performed followed by the step of removing portions of both the barrier and base
coatings and thereafter followed by applying the metallic contaminant.
11. A method according to claim 9, wherein the step of removing portions of the base
coating is performed before applying the barrier coating to the base coating and thereafter
followed by applying the metallic contaminant to the exposed steel.
12. A method according to claim 9, 10 or 11, wherein the barrier coating is a metal-phosphate-based
coating containing at least 25 percent, by weight, of phosphorus in the dried coating.
13. A method according to claim 12, wherein the barrier coating is a magnesia-based
coating.
14. A method according to anyone of claims 9 to 13, wherein the step of annealing
the steel uses a reducing atmosphere of substantially hydrogen.
15. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the pattern comprises
generally parallel lines of exposed steel extending substantially transverse to the
rolling direction of the steel.
16. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the base coating
is forsterite.
17. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein prior to the annealing
step and after applying the metallic contaminant, the silicon steel is fabricated
into an article of manufacture.
18. A semi-finished sheet or strip product of final texture annealed grain-oriented
silicon steel, the product comprising:
a forsterite base coating having portions thereof removed in a line pattern on the
underlying silicon steel;
a metallic contaminant on the steel at least on the areas of exposed steel, the metallic
contaminant being copper, tin, nickel, zinc or antimony, or combinations or compounds
thereof;
the pattern of removed base coating being suitable to effect heat resistant domain
refinement and reduced core loss when the semi-finished sheet product is annealed
in a reducing atmosphere to produce along the pattern in the steel lines of permanent
pores to effect heat resistant domain refinement and reduced core loss of a substantially
stress-free steel sheet.
19. A semi-finished sheet product according to claim 18, comprising a barrier coating
at least on the base coated areas, the barrier coating having a primary constituent
of phosphorus or silicate, or combinations or compounds thereof.