[0001] This invention relates to solid composite materials, preferably metal-matrix composites
(MMC), which comprise a continuous metal matrix material having a plurality of separate
particles, i.e. dispersates, dispersed throughout the matrix and to methods for making
such composites having an extremely uniform dispersion of the dispersates and simultaneously
having essentially no porosity. The invention is particularly directed to metal-matrix
composites having ceramic dispersates substantially uniformly distributed throughout
the matrix phase. The present invention provides a solution to the problems of excessive
porosity in the MMC's and excessive clustering of the particulates, which problems
have prevented as-cast composites from having properties comparable to powder metallurgically
forged or extruded composites.
[0002] It is well known that composite materials often have better mechanical properties
than either the matrix or the dispersates alone. The extent of the improvement in
properties has generally been found to be a function of the degree of distribution
of the dispersates. However, making composites with reproducible and extremely uniform
dispersions of dispersates has proved extremely difficult.
[0003] One method of making composites in which a matrix material is obtained from a fluid
state is to disperse dispersates in a precursor liquid and then form the composite
by solidifying the liquid part, i.e. dispersion medium, of the dispersion. In practice,
however, it has been quite difficult to perform due to density differences which
normally are present between the dispersates and the dispersion medium. These differences
generally lead to a non-uniform distribution of the dispersates in not only the liquid
dispersion, but also the final composite.
[0004] U.S. Pat. No. 4,735,656 suggests overcoming the density segregation problem by (i)
mixing metal particulates with ceramic particulates and then (ii) heating the mixture
to a temperature high enough to cause partial melting of the metal (so that it fuses
into a dense matrix when cooled) but not so high as to cause the ceramic particulates
to float therein. The care required to utilize this process makes the process undesirable
for large scale commercial operations. Also process does not inherently preclude
the presence of voids in the final product.
[0005] Another problem with using the simple mixing concept is that many of the most desirable
dispersates are difficult to wet by known fluid precursors of desirable matrix phases.
Int. Pat. Appln. WO 87/06624 teaches the use of specific dispersing and/or sweeping
impellers to promote high shear mixing while minimizing the introduction of gases
into the mixture as well as the retention of the gases at the interfaces of the dispersates
and the matrix material. U.S. Pat. No. 4,662,429 teaches the addition of lithium to
an aluminum matrix alloy melt to facilitate wetting and dispersing of the dispersate
in the matrix alloy. European Pat. Appln. No. 87 201512.8 describes composites of
a zinc-aluminum alloy reinforced with silicon carbide powder which "surprisingly"
has good mechanical properties without the difficulties often experienced with other
similar composites.
[0006] The difficulties in making good quality composites, and some of the methods attempted
for dealing with the problems are generally reviewed in "Solidification, Structures,
and Properties of Cast Metal-Ceramic Particle Composites," P.K. Rohatgi et al., 31
International Metals Reviews 115-39 (1986). One method, described in more detail by B. C. Pai et al., 13
Journal of Materials Science 329-35 (1978), involves pressing together dispersates with powdered matrix material
to form a pellet, introducing the pellet with stirring below the surface of the fluid
matrix precursor material for a sufficient time both to melt the pellet and to disperse
the dispersates within the total amount of fluid precursor material, and then solidifying
the dispersion. Analogously, J. Cisse et al. in 68
Metallurgical Transactions 195-97 (1975) describe the use of a "master alloy" of sintered aluminum powder rods
which contain 10 w/o aluminum oxide.
[0007] A. Mortensen et al.,
Journal of Metals, February 1988, pp. 12-19, also reviews the field and refers to Rohatgi et al. as
listing a number of techniques for introducing particulates, including pre-infiltrating
a packed bed of particulates to form a pellet or "master alloy" and redispersing and
diluting it into a melt of a matrix material or its precursor.
[0008] All of the prior art methods initially produce composites which contain substantial
porosity unless the dispersates are easily wet by the fluid matrix material. And if
the dispersates are easily wet, the subsequent properties of the composite are often
degraded as a result of chemical reactions which occur between the matrix material
and the dispersates.
[0009] It is therefore an object of this invention to produce composites containing as
little porosity as possible. It is a further object to minimize the time required
to make the composites so that chemical degradation of the dispersates by the final
matrix material or a precursor thereto in the composite is precluded or at least
substantially minimized.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0010] Composites having the most desirable properties for many purposes are produced when
the dispersates therein are sufficiently widely dispersed that most of them do not
touch another dispersate particle. This class of composites is characterized herein
as having "discrete" dispersates or as a "discrete dispersion." It has now been found
that many of the difficulties in the prior art of making discrete composites can be
overcome by using an indirect method of preparation which entails (i) making a concentrated
dispersion of dispersates and a precursor to the final matrix in which there is intimate
contact between the precursor matrix material and the dispersates and then (ii) dissolving
the concentrated dispersate dispersion in additional matrix precursor material.
[0011] Thus in the present invention a concentrated dispersion is used to form the more
dilute dispersion of the disired composition by mixing it with additional matrix
fluid precursor and dispersing it therein. If the mixing is done while the dispersion
medium of the concentrated dispersion is still fluid, this embodiment is referred
to as a "continuous" method. Sometimes, however, it may be more convenient to solidify
the dispersion medium of the concentrated dispersion producing a "concentrated composite"
before beginning the mixing step to prepare the finally desired composite. Composites
made in this way are denoted as being made by the "concentrated composite" embodiment
of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0012]
Figure 1 is a cross-section view of one type of apparatus useful in the practice the
instant invention.
Figures 2-3 and 6-7 are cross sections of composites produced according to the invention
or of comparison composites.
Figures 4 and 5 are cross-section views of another type of apparatus useful for the
practice of this invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0013] It has been found that satisfactory concentrated disper sions according to this
invention can be made by packing dispersates into a porous bed in which most dispersates
touch at least one other dispersate, and then infiltrating the packed bed with a fluid
precursor to the desired final matrix such that (i) the reasonably uniform distribution
of dispersates characteristic of the packed bed is maintained during the infiltration
and (ii) most, if not all, of the gas existing in the interparticle volume of the
bed is displaced during the infiltration step. In this way, the infiltrated packed
dispersate bed becomes a concentrated dispersion of dispersates useful in this invention.
Preferably the concentrated dispersion will have no more than about five volume per
cent voids and/or gases. Still more preferably, porosity is substantially entirely
eliminated from the concentrated composite. Dispersions having these characteristics
are made having higher concentrations of dispersates than is normally desired in
the final product.
[0014] If the packed porous bed of dispersates is evacuated before infiltration, the fluid
infiltration into the bed may be accomplished from multiple directions, if desired.
Often it is more convenient to omit the evacuation step and infiltrate the dispersate
bed only from a single direction while permitting the displaced air to escape through
an open part of the bed. When the fluid precursor does not spontaneously wet the dispersates,
infiltration may still be successsfully achieved by applying a pressure to the fluid.
Although the infiltration process generally does separate some of the interparticle
contracts between the packed dispersates, the resultant dispersion is more concentrated
than the final dispersion made therefrom.
[0015] The infiltration of the packed porous bed of dispersates is usually performed under
minimum suitable conditons of both temperature and pressure. By using a low temperature,
any reaction between the dispersate powder and the matrix precursor will be minimized.
Thus the temperature of the matrix precursor fluid used should be about 25 to about
200, preferably about 50 to about 175, and most preferably about 75 to about 125°C.
above its melting point. Preferably the dispersates are preheated to essentially the
temperature of the matrix precursor fluid to prevent metal cooling or freezing off
which otherwise could occur and reduce or prevent the complete infiltration. With
regard to pressure, the use of pressure has been found to be advantageous to reduce/eliminate
porosity in the concentrated dispersion but simultaneously increase the cost of performing
the infiltration. Thus the pressure used is chosen to balance the level of porosity
of the concentrated dispersion and the cost. Generally, an overpressure of at least
25 psi will be preferred with still higher overpressures being more preferred as the
particle size of the dispersates is reduced. Also to help minimize any porosity due
to too low a pressure having been used, it has been found to be desirable to increase
the overpressure to about 200 to 300 psi near the end of the infiltration process.
[0016] In order to promote good displacement of interparticle gases at relatively low infiltration
pressures during the formation of the composites, it has been found beneficial to
incorporate known wetting agents to the matrix precursor materials used to form the
concentrated dispersion. The specific wetting agents and amounts thereof utilized
will normally depend upon the specific matrix material and dispersate and can be
determined by routine experimentation. For instance, when preparing a composite of
silicon carbide and an aluminum alloy, tin and potassium hexafluorozirconate are preferred
wetting agents since they are known to promote the wetting of silicon carbide and
can be readily added to the aluminum alloy precursor material.
[0017] The mixing of the concentrated dispersion with additional precursor fluid is then
accomplished in a way that avoids the difficulties with dispersing small particles
directly in an open container of fluid, as discussed above. With the favorable concentrated
dispersions of this invention, mixing becomes very easy. Portions of the concentrated
dispersion can simply be placed atop a second matrix fluid, if the dispersates are
denser than the matrix, or covered with the second matrix fluid, if the dispersates
are less dense than the matrix. A combination of gravity and stirring then mixes the
dispersates into the total amount of fluid matrix precursor. It has been found that
concentrated dispersions made by the methods described herein often have the very
favorable property that, at some temperatures, they behave as if the dispersates were
so well bonded to the matrix that each dispersate tends to carry a substantial amount
of matrix material with it when moved.
[0018] Preferably a non-vortex generating mixer will be used to minimize any air entrapment.
The mixer must obviously be made of a material which will not react with or degrade
the matrix precursor fluid. Suitable such materials will depend upon the particular
composition of the composites. For example, with an aluminum alloy matrix, mixers
prepared from graphite or steel coated with a nonwetting wash or spray such as carbon,
sodium chloride, or mica wash are preferred. In some alloys, Cotronics 902 machinable
ceramic from Contronics Co., Brooklyn, NY, may be used.
[0019] High shear mixing is preferred to disperse any small clusters or agglomerates of
dispersates remaining from the concentrated dispersion and also to provide a more
uniform distribution of the dispersates in the final composite. During mixing, the
temperature is normally maintained within the range at which the mixtures containing
the dispersates exhibit thixotropy so that efficient mixing is achieved while reducing
the possibility of dispersate resegregation due to density differences as the mixed
material moves away from the mixing zone.
[0020] Certain procedures for accomplishing the mixing step have been found either convenient
or preferred. In performing the continous embodiments of the invention, as shown in
Examples 9 and 10 below, it is often convenient to provide a pressurizable reservoir
of the concentrated dispersion from which it is injected into at least a portion
of the second precursor fluid. To facilitate mixing, it is generally preferred to
inject the concen trated dispersion into a flowing stream of the second precursor
fluid. For the concentrated composite embodiment, for which Example 1 below describes
a suitable apparatus, a portion of the concentrated composite may be held mechanically
below the surface of a body of second precursor fluid, maintained at a temperature
high enough to reliquify at least part of the matrix of the concentrated composite,
and portions of the two components of the concentrated composite can be mixed into
the second precursor fluid as liquefication occurs. Alternatively, the concentrated
composite can be heated to, and held at, a temperature sufficient for partial liquefication
of its matrix, and additional fluid precursor added with mixing.
[0021] One aspect of this invention is the final composites produced. The invention provides
the first discrete dispersions that are (i) substantially free of pores and (ii) have
an essentially uniform dispersion of the dispersates. In particular, new dispersions
and also not more than about 40 volume percent of dispersates and also not more than
about 5 volume percent voids, pores and gases are provided herein.
[0022] In connection with this invention, it should be understood that a "precursor of a
matrix material" refers to any material that can be converted into the desired matrix
material by chemical or physical treatment without dislocation of any dispersates
contained therein. Thus, a liquid alloy or a thermoplastic resin is a precursor to
the solid alloy or resin into which it hardens on cooling; or fluid mixtures of polyfunctional
isocyanates and polyfunctional alcohols are precursors to the polyurethanes that they
form by chemical reaction after mixing; or fluid acrylated materials are precursors
of the polymer that they form after exposure to an electron beam. "Matrix" is used
herein to refer to the continuous phase of any dispersion or composite, be it in
a fluid or a solid state.
[0023] The solid composite materials of the present invention are comprised of two primary
materials - the matrix and the dispers ates. Matrix materials useful in the present
invention include metals, metal alloys, and thermoplastic resins. Suitable metals
and metal alloys include aluminum, aluminum alloys, magnesium, magnesium alloys, bronze,
copper, copper alloys, zinc, and zinc alloys. Suitable thermoplastic resins include
polyester polyurethanes, polyether polyurethanes, and acrylic polymers and copolymers.
Preferably the matrix material is selected from aluminum, aluminum alloys, magnesium,
magnesium alloys, and magnesium-aluminum alloys. Most preferably the matrix material
is an aluminum alloy containing less than about 12 w/o, preferably less than about
8 w/o, and most preferably less than about 1.5 w/o silicon.
[0024] Suitable dispersates for use herein are ceramic materials such as silicon carbide,
silicon nitride, aluminum nitride, alumina, titania, silica, boron carbide, borides,
carbides, silicides, diamond and the like. These materials are characterized as having
a modulus, strength and wear resistance which are substantially higher than that
of the matrix materials. Preferably the dispersates are either silicon carbide, silicon
nitride, aluminum nitride, or aluminum oxide. Most preferably the dispersates are
silicon carbide. The dispersates, irrespective of the particular chemical composition,
are used in the form of fine particles, generally having an average particle size
of about 0.1 to about 45 microns, preferably about 3 to about 20 microns, and most
preferably about 7 to about 15 microns.
[0025] The concentrated dispersion will generally be prepared to contain as much dispersate
as possible. Thus, about 25 to about 85 w/o, preferably about 45 to about 60 w/o,
and most preferably about 53 to about 56 w/o dispersates will be used.
[0026] Some of the most useful applications of this invention are in the manufacture of
composites of silicon carbide dispersed in aluminum or magnesium alloys. Such materials
are valuable construction materials for applications such as airplane bodies and
other components in which a combination of low density, high toughness, and high flexure
resistance at temperatures not too far below melting point of the alloy are needed.
Previously it had been very difficult to make composite products having about 20 w/o
silicon carbide, the most mechanically desirable range, with the substantially uniform
dispersion of silicon carbide particles that is needed. This was particularly true
when the silicon carbide particles were mostly less than ten microns in size and/or
had a wide distribution of sizes. Such composites can be readily produced with the
present invention.
[0027] Alloys of aluminum containing from about 1 to 4% silicon are known to make stronger
composites when reinforced with ceramic materials such as silicon carbide than do
aluminum alloys containing less silicon. This is so even though unreinforced silicon-aluminum
alloys containing less than 1% silicon are stronger than those containing more than
1% silicon. The difficulty of making composites with low-silicon aluminum alloys and
silicon carbide is believed caused by a reaction between the low-silicon aluminum
alloy and the silicon carbide dispersates which produces aluminum carbides. The aluminum
carbide formation weakens the matrix/particulate interface and makes SiC a less effective
reinforcement material.
[0028] Similarly, when silica dispersates are used with a low-silicon aluminum alloy they
can react with the aluminum to form silicon and alumina. And when titania dispersates
are utilized to reinforce low-silicon alloys, they can react to from Ti

Al and alumina. Similarly, other deleterious reactions can occur with various ceramic
and metal combinations, as is known.
[0029] The difficulties caused by such deleterious interactions between desirable dispersates
and either the precursor to the matrix material or the matrix material itself, such
as occur when silicon carbide dispersates are used to reinforce a low-silicon aluminum,
can be overcome with an embodiment of the present invention. The deleterious reaction
is inhibited sufficiently, or ideally prevented, by coating the dispersate particles
with a material that (i) will not react with either the precursor or the matrix material,
but (ii) will produce an adherent coating on the dispersates, and (iii) will promote
wetting of the dispersates by the matrix precursor.
[0030] Suitability of particular dispersate coating materials can be determined by routine
experimentation by coating particular dispersates, then attempting to infiltrate a
packed porous bed thereof with the desired matrix precursor fluid, and if the infiltration
succeeds then attempting to disperse the concentrated dispersion into additional matrix
precursor material. Examples of suitable coatings for use with low-silicon aluminum
alloys include metals, metal oxides, metal nitrides, metal carbides and metal borides.
When a metal coating such as copper, molybdenum, nickel, zinc, tin, or titanium is
used, it is preferably extremely thin, i.e. up to about 2 microns, to minimize any
detrimental intermetallic interactions. Metal oxides useful herein include such as
silica, alumina, chromia, nickel oxide, copper oxide, mullite, spinels, titania, magnesium
silicate, lithium silicate, and the like. Metal nitrides useful herein include silicon
nitride, titanium nitride, boron nitride, and aluminum nitride. Metal silicon compounds
useful herein include molybdenum, copper and titanium silicides.
[0031] Silicon dioxide, which can be formed on silicon carbide by heating in air, is currently
preferred, partially because it is particularly convenient to produce by merely heating
silicon carbide powder at about 1300°C. for about 30 minutes. Alumina, which can conveniently
be coated onto silicon carbide particles from a seeded sol to form the coating is
also preferred.
[0032] Such coatings have generally not been found necessary for final composites prepared
with magnesium-based alloys, because the formation of deletereous products has not
been found to be as extensive, even if the magnesium is alloyed with aluminum.
[0033] The practice of the invention can be further appreciated from the following non-limiting
examples in which all parts and percents are by weight unless otherwise specified.
Example 1
[0034] A quartz tube 16 cm in length and with an internal diameter of 2.2 cm was coated
internally for a distance of about 15 cm with a suspension of colloidal graphite available
from Acheson Colloids, Ltd., Brantford, Ontario, Canada, under the trade name AQUADAG.
A supporting rod, narrower than the inside diameter of the quartz tube but having
on one end a gas-permeable plug of porous refractory fireclay brick that fits tightly
within the coated tube, was then inserted from the uncoated end and positioned so
that the porous plug was about 10 cm from the opening of the coated end. The container
thus formed by the coated tube end and the porous plug was filled with grit F600 green
silicon carbide to a packing density of about 50 volume %, with the aid of a vibrating
table contacting the container. (The size distribution of Grit F600 silicon carbide
is described fully in publications of the Federation of European Producers of Abrasives,
hereinafter "FEPA") The particular lot of Grit F600 used for this experiment was measured
with a Coulter Counter and had 50% of its volume in particles with a size of more
than 9.1 microns; 3% of the volume was made up of grits larger than 15.3 microns,
94% of the volume was made up of grits larger than 4.8 microns, and the central 75%
of the volume was made up of grits with sizes between 6.2 and 12.2 microns. The central
75% of the volume is defined as the part of the sample excluding the largest and
the smallest particles that each make up 12.5% of the total volume.
[0035] The top surface of the packed bed of SiC was covered with a layer of porous alumina
paper (Product APA1 from Zircar Products, Florida, New York) and this end of the
container was then wrapped with aluminum foil. The porous alumina paper is fitted
tightly enough to keep the packed bed from falling out when the container is inverted
and to serve as a filter to exclude oxides or other unwanted foreign matter when molten
metal is later in filtrated into the packed bed. The aluminum foil allows the protected
end of the container to be immersed in the molten aluminum alloy without contaminating
the contents with a layer of oxide that forms spontaneously on molten aluminum alloys.
Shortly after immersion, the aluminum foil melts. The amount of aluminum foil is
too small to change the composition of the molten aluminum alloy to any significant
extent.
[0036] The wrapped container with its packed bed was then placed in a gas tight desiccator
that was evacuated to a pressure of no more than 0.01 bar and then backfilled with
argon. The container as thus prepared was positioned within an apparatus illustrated
in Figure 1. The quartz tube 1 now has the alumina paper 5 at the bottom of the packed
bed 4, with the porous fireclay plug 3 and the support road 2 on top. The tube 1 is
connected via a gas tight fitting 6 to a channel 7 that allows the input or exit of
gas from the space above the porous plug independently of the space 8 in the upper
part of the apparatus.
[0037] The tube with its packed bed was immersed as shown in Figure 1 in a bath of molten
A357 aluminum alloy (which contains about 7% silicon) 9, with a melting point of 610°C,
maintained within a graphite crucible 10 at a temperature of 700°C by a conventional
heating element 11. The crucible and heater are within a gas tight space defined by
container 12, which is protected from the heat of the heating element 11 by insulation
13. Space 8 was initially filled with argon gas at atmospheric pressure. After preheating
the tube containing the packed bed for 5 minutes, at which point the thermocouple
15 showed that the temperature of the molten metal 9 had recovered to the desired
value of 700°C. after being cooled by introduction of the packed bed and its container,
the pressure within the furnace above the layer of molten alloy was increased at the
rate of 1.36 bar/min by admission of additional argon gas through input channel 14.
This pressure caused the fluid alloy to flow through the packed bed from the bottom,
displacing gas from the top of the bed through the porous plug into the separate channel
7.
[0038] When the pressure reached 13.6 bars, the increase in pressure was discontinued and
the pressure maintained at that level for five minutes. The entire furnace was then
depressurized through outlet 15 and the tube containing the packed bed of SiC, now
infiltrated with molten alloy, was removed and cooled in the air to produce a concentrated
composite, which was separated from the quartz tube, by pushing from one end, and
then cut into pieces with a diamond saw. A photomicrograph of a polished cross section
of the concentrated composite produced is shown in Figure 2.
[0039] In a separate graphite crucible, 91 g of A357 alloy was melted and heated to 720°C,
and a piece weighing 62 g of the concentrated composite prepared as described above
was placed on top of the molten alloy. After ten minutes, the material was stirred
with a graphite rod to effect a preliminary break-up of the concentrated composite,
and a graphite rotating stirrer preheated to 600°C was then immersed and used to
stir the melt for 5 minutes at 300 rpm. The crucible was then removed from the furnace
and its contents poured into another crucible and cooled. The resulting composite
according to this invention with 20 volume percent (hereinafter v/o) SiC was examined
microscopically after preparing a polished cross section. There was good distribution
of the SiC dispersates throughout the composite, with apparently intimate contact
at most SiC-metal interfaces and little porosity, as shown in a micrograph of a cross
section of the composite in Figure 3.
Example 2
[0040] Particles of grit F600 silicon carbide were put into the bottom of a steel crucible
to give a packed bed with about 50 v/o SiC. A sufficient amount of molten alloy of
90% Mg - 10% Al to infiltrate the entire packed bed was poured over the bed, and the
crucible with its contents placed inside a pressurizable furnace maintained at 700°C.
Compressed argon was then admitted to the furnace until the pressure reached 34 bars.
This was sufficient to cause the molten alloy to impregnate all of the packed bed
except for a small pocket at the bottom into which the air originally present in the
packed bed had been displaced.
[0041] A portion of the fully impregnated concentrated composite prepared as described immediately
above was softened at 700°C. and mixed with an additonal amount of molten 90% Mg -
10% Al alloy chosen to result in a final composite with 20 v/o SiC. Mixing was initially
accomplished with a hand-held stirring rod until the concentrated composite was sufficiently
low in apparent viscosity to allow effective mechanical stirring. Mixing was then
continued with a double helical stirrer operated at 400 revolutions per minute. This
avoided entraining gas through vortex formation. After about five minutes stirring,
a semi-solid slurry that could be cast into a mold resulted. The material was then
cast and allowed to solidify. A well dispersed final composite was formed.
Example 3
[0042] This was performed in the same manner as Example 2, except that Grit F500 rather
than grit F600 silicon carbide was used.
Example 4
[0043] This was performed in the same manner as Example 2, except that Grit F320 rather
than grit F600 silicon carbide was used.
Example 5-7
[0044] The preparation of the concentrated composite for these examples was performed in
substantially the same manner as in Example 2-4 respectively, except that (i) a slightly
different apparatus, one that allowed evacuation as well as pressurization of the
space within the container for the dispersates, was used; (ii) initially solid alloy
material was added to the container above the packed bed; (iii) the space within the
container for the dispersates was evacuated after the solid metal and dispersates
had been placed within the furnace, which was maintained at 900°C, before pressurizing
to cause infiltration; and (iv) a commercially pure magnesium alloy was used for
the matrix.
[0045] The concentrated composite was mixed with additional molten matrix alloy in a special
container, under an argon atmosphere, using an agitator similar to a turbine moving
at 2,000 - 3,000 revolutions per minute. A system of baffles in the container prevented
any significant gas entrapment during mixing. The dispersion was mixed for about five
minutes at a temperature of about 700°C. The stirrer was then immediately removed
and the dispersion promptly cast in a copper chill mold about 9 mm deep. A well-dispersed
composite with about 15 v/o dispersates resulted.
Example 8
[0046] This was performed in the same way as Examples 5-7 except that a finer particle size
of silicon carbide, averaging 3 microns in size, was used.
Example 9
[0047] This example illustrates application of the invention to continuous casting and is
accomplished with apparatus shown in cross section in Figure 4. Molten alloy 100 and
concentrated composite are continuously fed into a chamber 102 maintained at a temperature
that will keep the mixture at least partially fluid. From chamber 102 the mixture
is pumped and blended by a rotor 103 into a mixing region 104, where it experiences
vigorous agitation. The high shear rates in region 104 are achieved in a narrow gap
104 between chamber wall 105 sand a rotor 106. Both the chamber wall and the rotor
have surfaces including a conic frustrum with the same taper angle, so that the gap
width, and correspondingly the rate of shear, can be adjusted by relative vertical
displacement between the rotor and the chamber wall. The well dispersed dispersion
exits in region 107 and can be fed into a crucible for solidification processing,
continuously cast into a billet, or the like.
[0048] Alternatively, the concentrated composite itself could be rotated vigorously in a
bath of molten alloy so that portions of the concentrated composite are peeled off
at the interface as the matrix of the concentrated composite softens under the influence
of the higher temperature of the bath of molten alloy.
Example 10
[0049] This example illustrates another continuous method embodiment of the invention and
may be understood with the aid of Figure 5, a cross sectional view of apparatus useful
for the invention. A solid chamber 201 capable of withstanding the pressures involved
is provided with conventional means for maintaining various temperatures in different
regions in its interior and contains two inlets 202 and 203 and an outlet 204. At
inlet 202, molten metal 205 is supplied under pressure. At inlet 203, dispersates
206 are supplied at an appropriate rate and also under pressure by means of a ram,
screw feeder, or other appropriate device known to those skilled in the art.
[0050] During operation of the continuous process of this invention, chamber 201 is kept
at a temperature that will maintain molten metal in regions 205 and 207 and at a temperature
too low to melt the metal used at the top of region 206, which constitutes a packed
bed of dispersates. The flow of dispersates from zone 203 is maintained in a downward
direction by mechanical pressure exerted against the packed bed of dispersates, but
this does not prevent metal from filling the interparticle space in the packed bed
of dispersates in the lower part of the entry region for dispersates, where the temperature
is sufficiently high to keep the metal molten. Thus a zone of concentrated composite
according to this invention forms in region 207, but upward penetration of the metal
is limited by its solidification in the upper part of the inlet 203, creating a more
or less distinct boundary between region 207 containing concentrated composite and
region 206 with dispersates and gas only.
[0051] In the region where the molten metal 205 contacts the concentrated composite 207,
the flow rate of the metal is accelerated by a constriction caused by a bulge 208
in the chamber wall. In the region between 208 and 207, the concentrated composite
is continuously entrained downstream by the rapidly flowing molten metal and it is
sheared and dispersed into the flowing metal. At a sufficient distance downstream
from the constriction, a region 209 of substantially homogeneous and nonporous dispersion
is obtained. This dispersion can be continuously cast from the outlet 204 to yield
a solid continous billet 210 of the finally desired composite. The volume fractions
of metal matrix and dispersates are controlled by regulating the relative feeding
rates of dispersates and molten metal at their inlets 203 and 202 respectively.
[0052] Instead of a constriction, separate mechanical or electromagnetic stirring could
be used to disperse the concentrated composite into additional matrix precursor.
Example 11
[0053] This was performed in the same manner as Example 1, except that the SiC particulates
used were a mixture of equal volumes of FEPA Grit F400, Grit F500, and Grit F600.
The Grit F600 had the same size distribution as in Example 1. The Grit F500 material
had 3% of its volume in particles larger than 22.5 microns, 50% of its volume in particles
larger than 13.7 microns, 94% of its volume in particles larger than 8.7 microns,
and the central 75% of its volume in particles with sizes between 10.6 and 17.7 microns,
all as measured by a Coulter Counter. Using the same measurement technique, the Grit
F400, material had 3% of its volume in particles larger than 25 microns, 50% of its
volume in particles larger than 17 microns, 94% of its volume in particles larger
than 12 microns, and the central 75% of its volume in particles with sizes between
13 and 20. 5 microns.
[0054] The central 75% of the volume of the mixture had particles between 7.8 and 19 microns,
3% of the volume of the mixture was in particles smaller than 5.2 microns, and 94%
of the volume of the mixture was in particles larger than 21 microns. The final composite
produced had an apparently uniform distribution of all particle sizes of SiC within
the matrix when examined in cross section.
Example 12
[0055] This was the same as Example 1, except that the dispersates used were boron carbide
rather than silicon carbide. Good redistribution of the concentrated composite was
obtained in the final composite.
Example 13
[0056] This was performed in the same as Example 1, except that (i) 100 g of concentrated
composite and 215 g of additional A357 alloy were used, to give a 15 v/o composite;
(ii) the melt temperature during the mixing of the concentrated composite into the
additional molten alloy was only 670°C rather than 700°C; and final stirring was
for only 2.5 minutes instead of five. The difference in temperature considerably
increased the apparent viscosity during the mixing of the concentrated composite
with additional matrix material, and some large air pores were introduced during
the stirring and preserved in the final composite. Therefore, even though the SiC
dispersates were again well dispersed within the final composite, the results were
less preferable than for Example 1.
Example 14
[0057] This was performed in the same way as Example 1, except that (i) the alloy used was
Type 6061 alloy rather than the A357 and (ii) 100 g of concentrated composite and
149 g of additonal molten alloy were used in the final mixing step.
[0058] Type 6061 alloy contains 0.6% Si, 1.0% Mg, 0.3% Mn, and 0.2% Cr, with the balance
aluminum. Presumably because of the very low silicon content, the dispersion of the
concentrated composite within the final composite was not nearly so good as in Example
1. A micrograph of a cross section of the final composite produced in this example
is shown in Figure 6.
Example 15
[0059] This was performed in the same way as Example 14, except that the alloy used was
10% Si - 90% Al. The result contrasted sharply with that of Example 14, in that the
distribution of the SiC dispersates within the final composite was very uniform.
Example 16
[0060] This was performed in the same way as Example 14, except that the alloy used contained
99.9% aluminum. The dispersion of silicon carbide in the final composite was less
uniform than that achieved in Example 14.
Example 17
[0061] This was performed in the same way as Example 16, except that (i) the temperature
both for preparation and for mixing of the concentrated composite was raised to 800°C;
and (ii) 71 g of concentrated composite and 152 g of additional alloy were used in
the mixing step, which should have given a final composite with only 15 v/o SiC. In
fact, however, mixing the concentrated composite with additional metal proved to be
practically impossible. X-ray diffraction of a sample of the concentrated composite
showed the presence of aluminum carbide at the interfaces between the dispersates
and the matrix. This is believed to be the reason that the concentrated composite
was so difficult to break up.
Example 18
[0062] This was performed in the same manner as Example 17, except that (i) the final mixing
was at 720°C rather than 800°C and (ii) the SiC particulates used were heated in air
at 1300°C for thirty minutes before being infiltrated to form the concentrated composite.
This treatment is known to form a layer of SiO₂ on the surface of silicon carbide.
The silica surface greatly retards the formation of aluminum carbide, as confirmed
by an X-ray analysis of this concentrated composite, and thus the concentrated composite
could easily be dispersed in the final mixing step. A micrograph of a cross section
of the final composite thereby produced is shown in Figure 6.
Example 19
[0063] This was the same as Example 1, except that the SiC particulates, before forming
the concentrated composite, were coated with alumina in the following manner: a boehmite
sol at 10 w/o total solids containing 0.15 w/o of fine alpha alumina seeds, prepared
in a state of incipient gellation as described in detail in U.S. Patent 4,623,364
was prepared. One liter of this sol was mixed with one kilogram of FEPA Grit 600 SiC,
and the mixture then pumped through a NIRO spray drier, which caused the SiC to be
coated with an apparently uniform coating of dried alumina gel when examined by as
scanning electron microscope. The coated particulate was then heated at 1200°C for
thirty minutes to convert the alumina gel to alpha alumina. Conversion was confirmed
by x-ray diffraction analysis that showed alpha SiC and alpha alumina as the only
phases present.
[0064] The final composite prepared in this Example showed an excellent uniformity of dispersion
of the SiC within the matrix.
Comparative Example A
[0065] SiC was coated with Cr metal by an evaporation-condensation process to 29%. Infiltration
attempts with both A357 and Al 99.9 were made using quartz tubes 20 cm. long and .5
cm. ID. The temperature of the infiltrating aluminum was varied between 700°C and
800°C, and the pressure varied up to 400 psi. In both cases infiltration was negligible.
It is believed that the chrome metal was dissolved by the molten aluminum producing
an aluminum chrome alloy. Small additions of chrome to aluminum significantly raise
the melting temperature, thus freezing the metal front before infiltration can occur.
Thus chrome metal is not a useful coating material.
Comparative Example B
[0066] SiC powder, coated as in Comparative Example A, was calcined in air at 1200°C for
1/2 hour to promote the formation of chromia around each particle. The calcining only
converted the surface of the chrome coating to chromia. This powder was packed and
infiltrated with A357 as in Example 1 using a pressure of 375 psi and a temperature
of 750°C. 89 g of this master composite was heated to 850°C with 209g of A357 to
give a final composition of 14 %. After 2 1/2 hours, the master composite pieces
had not yet broken up; thus little dispersion occured. The protective barrier of
Cr₂O₃ on each particle dissolved, allowing the Al to react with the chrome, as in
Comparative Example A, to form a high melting alloy and to prevent the dispersion
of the master composite. Thus a surface chromia layer on a predominantly chrome coating
was not suitable.
Example 20
[0067] A master alloy was prepared using A357 and SiC coated with chrome to 3.5 wt% and
calcined as in Comparative Example B. In this case, however, the Cr was completely
oxidized to chromia. The infiltration occured at 750°C with 400 psi. 94.9 g of this
concentrated dispersion sample was dispersed into 235 g of A357 to give a composite
of 13.4 wt% SiC. This took 15 minutes at 850°C. Micrographs indicate a good dispersion
with a few clumps of master alloy remaining which can be broken down with improved
stirring. In this case the chrome oxide coating prevented any reaction between the
aluminum metal and the SiC to allow dispersion of the master alloy to occur. The
absence of any chrome metal in the coating also prevents the melting point of the
alloy from rising which had ben found to prevent dispersions of the master composite
in Comparative Examples A and B.
Example 21
[0068] A coating of Si₃N₄ on SiC particulate was produced by heating SiC in flowing nitrogen
gas to 1425°C. A master composite was produced as in Example #1 using A357 at 300
psi and 725° C. 75 g of this master composite was stirred into 192 g of A357 as in
Example 20 to give a final fraction of 13.1% SiC. Dispersion occured easily. Micrographs
of the final composite indicate good dispersion of the coated SiC particulate without
any noticeable reaction products being formed between the metal matrix and the coated
SiC dispersates.
Comparative Example C
[0069] SiC was coated to 8.3% Ni metal using a NiB electroless plating solution. Infiltration
was accomplished using quartz tubes, as in Example #19, with the A357 at 725°C and
applying a pressure of 200 psi. 9.3 g of this master alloy was dispersed into 57.9
g of A357 using a small porcelain crucible and a graphite stirring rod. Furnace temperature
was set to 800°C. The master composite did not disperse evenly, presumably due to
nickel-silicon alloy formation, thus indicating that a nickel metal coating is not
suitable with this aluminum alloy.
Example 22
[0070] The procedure of Comparative Example C was repeated reducing the nickel content
on the dispersates to 2% and using Al 99.9 as the matrix material and in both the
infiltration and the dispersion. A good dispersion results.
Example 23
[0071] SiC was given a total 9.5 % coating of a chromia-alumina solid solution. This coating
was produced by mixing equal weights of SiC and a 30 % solids solgel of Cr(NO₃)₃-9H₂O
and Al₂O₃-H₂O. The resulting slurry was dried to a powder and fired at 1250°C to remove
structurel water in the coating materials and to convert the nitrate to an oxide.
This SiC was infiltrated with A357 as in Example 1 using a temperature of 725° C.
and a pressure of 160 psi. 5.8 g of this master alloy was then stirred into 60.7 g
of A357 to give a composite having 4.0% SiC. Dispersion was good.
Example 24
[0072] A 6% molbdenum coating was placed on silicon carbide particles by mixing coarse
molybdenum powder with F600 SiC in an appropriate weight ration and heating in a
vacuum furnace to evaporate the molybdenum and redeposit it on the SiC particles.
The coated particles were then processed as in Example 1 with A357 alloy to form a
concentrated dispersion thereof containing 54% dispersates. The concentrated dispersion
was then stirred into further A357. Good break-up of the concentrated dispersion is
observed and a uniform final composite is produced.
Example 25
[0073] The procedure of Example 24 was repeated to produce a 6% titanium metal coating on
silicon carbide dispersates, to use those dispersates to prepare a concentrated dispersion,
and to use the concentrated dispersion to prepare a final uniform dispersion. A good
dispersion resulted.
Example 26
[0074] The procedure of Example 25 was repeated to produce the titanium metal coated silicon
carbide dispersates and then the titanium coating was oxidized to converted it to
titania. Infiltration with A357 at a pressure of 160 psi was barely adequate to produce
a void-free concentrated dispersion, but when repeated at 300 psi the process proceeded
smoothly. Good final dispersions were produced in each case.
Example 27
[0075] A titanium nitride coating was placed on silicon carbide dispersates by (i) forming
a silica and carbon diffusion layer by calcining the SiC in air at 1100°C., (ii) coating
titanium metal thereon by a pack diffusion process, and then (iii) nitriding at 925
- 1025°C. to convert the metallic Ti to TiN. The resulting dispersates were readily
infiltrated with pure aluminum to form a concentrated dispersion which was stirred
into further pure aluminum to produce a well- dispersed final composite product.
1. A process for the manufacture of a composite of a plurality of discrete solid dispersates
within a solid matrix material, which comprises
(a) forming a concentrated dispersion of said dispersates within a first quantity
of a fluid material that is a precursor of a portion of said solid matrix;
(b) mixing at least a portion of said concentrated dispersion with a second quantity
of a fluid material which is a precursor of the matrix of the final composite;
(c) dispersing the dispersates contained in said at least portion of said concentrated
dispersion into the resulting fluid material; and
(d) solidifying said fluid material from step (c) to form the final composite.
2. A process according to claim 1, wherein a packed porous bed of said plurality of
dispersates is formed and said packed porous bed of dispersates is infiltrated with
said first quantity of fluid material.
3. A process according to claim 2, wherein said packed porous bed is evacuated before
said infiltrating.
4. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, which comprises solidifying
at least part of the matrix of said concentrated dispersion before step (b) is performed.
5. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said dispersates
are comprised predominantly of silicon carbide, boron carbide, silicon nitride, or
aluminum nitride.
6. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said dispersates
have a surface layer of a barrier material which retards, at the temperature of formation
of the concentrated dispersion and at the temperature of formation of the final composite,
a chemical reaction that would otherwise occur between the material of the dispersates
and said fluid material.
7. A process according to claim 6, wherein said barrier layer is comprised predominantly
of a metal, a metal oxide, a metal nitride, a metal silicide, a metal carbide, or
a metal boride.
8. A process according to claim 6 or 7, wherein the first quantity of fluid material
contains a material which facilitates wetting of the dispersates without promoting
deleterious chemical reactions.
9. A process according to any one of claims 6-8, wherein said barrier material comprises
silicon dioxide.
10. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the mixing of
at least a portion of the concentrated composite with the second quantity of fluid
material is performed at a temperature at least 70°C. higher than the melting point
of the matrix of the final composite.
11. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the concentrated
dispersion comprises 25 to 85 weight percent dispersates and 75 to 15 weight percent
matrix precursor.
12. A composite comprising:
(a) a matrix
(b) from 5 to 40 v/o of discrete dispersates; and
(c) not more than 5% pores, voids, and/or gases.
13. A composite according to claim 12, wherein the matrix is aluminum, an aluminum
alloy, bronze, copper, a copper alloy, magnesium, a magnesium alloy, titanium, a titanium
alloy, zinc, or a zinc alloy.
14. A composite according to claim 13 or 14, wherein the dispersates are of silicon
carbide, silicon nitride, aluminum nitride, alumina, titania, silica, boron carbide,
a boride, a carbide, a silicide, or diamond.
15. A composite according to claim 13 or 14, wherein the dispersates have a surface
layer of a barrier material which retards a chemical reaction that would otherwise
occur between the material at the core of the dispersates and said matrix material.
16. A composite according to claim 15, wherein said barrier layer is comprised predominantly
of a metal, a metal oxide, a metal nitride, a metal silicide, a metal carbide, or
a metal boride.
17. A composite according to claim 15 or 16, wherein said dispersates are predominantly
silicon carbide and the matrix is predominantly comprised of aluminum containing less
than 12% silicon.