(19)
(11) EP 0 348 360 B1

(12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION

(45) Mention of the grant of the patent:
19.01.1994 Bulletin 1994/03

(21) Application number: 89830264.1

(22) Date of filing: 14.06.1989
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC)5A61K 31/70

(54)

Pharmacological use of uridine in the treatment of nervous disorders

Verwendung von Uridin zur Behandlung nervöser Störungen

Utilisation pharmacologique de l'uridine pour le traitement des maladies nerveuses


(84) Designated Contracting States:
AT BE CH DE ES FR GB LI NL SE

(30) Priority: 21.06.1988 IT 4811888

(43) Date of publication of application:
27.12.1989 Bulletin 1989/52

(73) Proprietor: POLIFARMA S.p.A.
00155 Roma (RM) (IT)

(72) Inventors:
  • de Luca, Giovanna
    I-00136 Roma RM (IT)
  • Di Stazio Giovanni
    I-00136 Roma RM (IT)
  • Materazzi, Mario
    I-00155 Roma RM (IT)
  • Politi, Vincenzo
    I-00179 Roma RM (IT)

(74) Representative: Bazzichelli, Alfredo et al
c/o Società Italiana Brevetti S.p.A. Piazza di Pietra, 39
00186 Roma
00186 Roma (IT)


(56) References cited: : 
EP-A- 0 178 267
WO-A-89/03837
EP-A- 0 216 133
   
  • NEUROCHEM. INT., vol. 15, no. 1, 1989, pages 107-113; L.F. AGNATI et al.: "Effects of chronic treatment with uridine on striatal dopamine release and dopamine related behaviours in the absence or the presence of chronic treatment with haloperidol"
  • ACTA PHYSIOL. SCAND., vol. 132, no. 2, February 1988, pages 209-216; C. FARABEGOLL et al.: "Chronic uridine treatment reduces the level of [3H]spiperone-labelled dopamine receptors and enhances their turnover rate in striatum of young rats: relationship to dopamine-dependent behaviours"
  • MED. INT., vol. 12, nos. 8-9, August/September 1977, pages 425-426; CL. MARIE: "Etude de l'uteplex* en psychiatrie"
   
Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to the European patent granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent Convention).


Description


[0001] The present invention relates to neuropharmacology and in particular to the pharmacological use of uridine in the treatment of those nervous disorders due to a modified dopaminergic balance, such as schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease.

[0002] It is already known in the state of the art (reference is made to EP-A-0178267) that an administration of uridine has a protective effect on certain cerebral hormonal peptides, in particular somatostatin and cholecystokinin, when an insulinic hypoglycemia is induced in rat in an animal pathology pattern.

[0003] In Acta Physiol. Scand. 1988, 132, 209-216 the effect is studied of chronic uridine treatment on the recovery of striatal D-2 dopamine receptors after their blokade. The treatment produces an increase of the rate of recovery of the receptors in young, but not in adult rats. Thus in young rats uridine may modulate the steady state and turnover rate of striatal D-2 dopamine receptors.

[0004] Cholecystokinin (CCK) is a hormonal peptide having 33 aminoacid residues, which acts in various manners both on the gastro-intestinal tract, and on the central nervous system (CNS) of mammals.

[0005] Psychopharmacology, Raven Press, 1987, Chapter 130, pages 1258-1260 describes that at the intestine level CCK produces contraction of the gall bladder, decrease of gastsric emptying, and stimulation of pancreatic enzyme secrection. Systemic injection of CCK produces a potent dose-related suppression of feeding in a wide variety of animals, including monkeys. In humans, intravenous infusion of CCK reduces food intake both in obese and lean subjects.

[0006] It is also known in the state of the art (Ann. Rev. Pharmacol., 23, 7-9, 1983) that at the CNS level, CCK appears to act through its octapeptide fragment, denominated CCK-8, which appears to be present mainly in cerebral areas, such as cortex, hypocampus, amygdala and hypothalamus. Particularly in the cortex, CCK appears to be the most widespread hormonal peptide.

[0007] Furthermore, it has been known in the state of the art for some years (see Nature 285, 476-478, 1985) that the hormonal peptides present in CNS are almost always associated to classic neurotransmitters (catecholamine, serotonine, gaba, and the like) presumably for modulating their physiologic activity on neurons.

[0008] In particular CCK was found almost always associated to dopamine, which is one of the most important catecholamines of CNS.

[0009] Dopamine is in fact one of the most important neurotransmitters, and it is known that an altered balance therof produces serious psychic disorders, such as schizophrenia and psychomotoric disorders, such as Parkinson's disease.

[0010] The discovery that CCK results to be always associated to dopamine has stimulated a lot of studies on the interactions between CCK and dopamine, on the basis of which the belief has been obtained that CCK acts as neuromodulator with respect to dopamine, in that:

a) CCK can activate the hyperpolarized dopaminergic neurons;

b) CCK can increase the activity of dopaminergic neurons, namely the dopamine producing neurons, in the areas in which both CCK and dopamine exist together (dopamine will be hereinafter shortened into DA);

c) CCK is able to induce a tonic state of inactivation in certain dopaminergic neurons;

d) it is able to enhance the inhibition of dopaminergic neurons induced by low doses of apomorphine (see Psychopharmacology, 1987, Chapter 20, page 116).



[0011] As a consequence according to the state of the art, CCK has been considered as a possible drug for treating schizophrenia, in view of its recognized properties of modulating the dopaminergic receptor.

[0012] In fact, whereas it is still uncertain whether schizophrenia can be considered a single disease as far as a single etiology and a single optimal treatment are concerned, in the last ten years a considerable therapeutic progress has been made by the development of ever more selective drugs.

[0013] The results of the first tests using chlorpromazine had caused to be accepted the evidence that all the neuroleptics developped in the past reduced psychosis through a block of the DA receptors. However, this treatment often resulted in acute and chronic side effects, which in humans were manifested by Parkinson type tremors and tardive dyskinesia.

[0014] Consequently the strategy was followed of developping new antipsychotic drugs by using the selective antagonism on certain receptor sites of DA. This has been possible in that in the last years more and more information has been obtained concerning the central dopaminergic system, its anatomy, biochemistry and physiology, along with its multiple capability of interaction with other neurotransmitters.

[0015] CCK-8 was therefore supposed to be a possible drug of new type for schizophrenia, both in that it is mainly located at the cortex level, and in that it is located together with DA in mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons. As is described in the above mentioned Psychopharmacology, on pages 721-722, as well as 736-737 and 1137-1138, CCK-8 has been tested for its antipsychotic action in schizophrenic subjects by some Japanese students. This initial study referred that CCK-8 was a rather powerful antipsychotic.

[0016] Preclinical studies were then undertaken to investigate efficiency and mechanism of action of CCK-8. Whereas these studies are at present under prosecution, confirming a strong action of CCK-8 in schizophrenia, however, the controlled clinical tests successively carried out have been consistantly negative. Not only psychosis, but also other centrally mediated functions, such as visual evoked potential and involuntary movements in the patients failed to change with CCK-8. The peptide also fails to alter the symptoms in severely affected Parkinson's disease patients. On the other hand, in animal models and in vitro experiments, CCK-8 modulates the release of DA from nerve terminals. These central actions occur in rats when CCK is injected directly into the brain or it is placed in contact with the tissues. An explanation of the negative clinical results of CCK-8 in the treatment of schizophrenia is that the peptide fails to enter the brain with systemic administration, as it has been evidenced in tests with monkeys, in that it is not able to cross the blood-brain barrier.

[0017] This results in the conclusion that an improvement of psychosis in schizophrenia cannot be obtained by administration of CCK.

[0018] It has now been surprisingly found, according to the invention, that an adminsitration of uridine produces the effect that an administration of CCK fails to produce, i.e. the effect of controlling the function of the dopaminergic system.

[0019] According to the invention it is possible to carry out a treatment of psychic disorders of schizophrenic and Parkinson's disease type, by means of administration of uridine to subjects suffering from an altered functioning of the dopaminergic system. It is consequently an object of the invention the use of uridine in pharmaceutic formulations for the above mentioned indication.

[0020] Pharmacological tests supporting the above mentioned use are described hereinafter.

1. Test on cerebral aging



[0021] The test herein described shows that an administration of uridine has a selective effect on the protection of CCK in cerebral ageing.

[0022] To this end uridine was administered for six months to adult rats. It is known that during aging many neurotransmitters and neurohormones are produced in CNS in much more reduced amounts, both because a considerable aspecific loss of neurons occurs, and in view of particular metabolic and circulatory problems. Among others, also the cerebral hormonal peptides somatostatin and CCK undergo a wide fall during ageing.

[0023] This test was evaluating the effect on rats chronically treated with uridine with respect to the protection from somatostatin and CCK fall during physiological ageing.

[0024] Twenty male rats CD aged six months were treated for six months with uridine. The substance was dissolved into the drinking water in a 0.5 mg/ml concentration. In average, the rats consumed 12.5 mg per day.

[0025] Upon reaching one year of age, the animals were sacrificed and the brains sliced and treated with immunocytochemical reactives, following the method described in Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, Supplementum 532, 1984.

[0026] The results, expressed in comparison to somatostatin and CCK values found in rats having the same age, maintained in the same conditions, but not treated with uridine, are shown in the following Table 1.
TABLE 1
Effect of chronical treatment with uridine on rats 12.5 mg/die per os on immunoreactivity from somatostatin (SRIF) and cholecystokinin (CCK) (arbitrary units)
Cerebral Area SRIF CCK
  Controls Uridine Controls Uridine
FrPa 83 ± 8 78 ± 3 --- ---
CPu 100 ± 5 92 ± 8 102 ± 8 95 ± 10
PoA 90 ± 10 83 ± 3 168 ± 12 275 ± 25**
SCh 280 ± 20 243 ± 33 --- ---
Arch 290 ± 20 315 ± 35 --- ---
Hip 85 ± 15 80 ± 5 105 ± 5 175 ± 25**
VM 185 ± 15 235 ± 35 --- ---
Me 392 ± 27 435 ± 15 152 ± 15 298 ± 40**
MPO 215 ± 15 175 ± 25 --- ---
Ce 140 ± 10 140 ± 10 --- ---
GD 67 ± 17 80 ± 10 128 ± 8 175 ± 25*
En --- --- 212 ± 12 345 ± 15**
* p<0.05
** p<0.01 following Dunn test
NOTES:
The results obtained in the cerebral aging test show on the one hand the protective action of uridine on cerebral CCK falls, but on the other hand have surprisingly shown that other neurohormones, such as somatostatin, are not protected by administration of the compound.


[0027] Therefore, it is to be recognized that uridine is not involved in an aspecific way on all the neurons, but it is selectively involved only for certain neurons which contain CCK as a modulator.

[0028] This evidences that uridine shows a pharmacologic effect which is due directly to the protection effected on the neurons in which CCK is present.

2. Tests on pharmacologic action of uridine



[0029] The tests hereinafter illustrated show that uridine is able to pharmacologically act through CCK on CNS, on schizophrenia, and moreover in all the cases of an altered balance of the dopaminergic system.

[0030] The test was based on the response of dopamine to stimulation with a classic neuroleptic drug.

[0031] It is well known that when a neuroleptic drug, i.e. a substance which stimulates neurons, is administered to animals, an overproduction of DA is observed in the dopaminergic areas of CNS, in that blocking of the dopaminergic receptor stimulates a higher production of the neurotransmitter, which in fact is dopamine. This DA produced in excess is considered to be the cause of the side effects produced by the neuroleptic drugs presently used for the treatment of schizophrenia, and also of the neuron degradation which is observed when such compounds are administered for a long time.

[0032] In the following tests, haloperidol was used as a neuroleptic drug. The method and results of the test are described hereinafter.

[0033] Four groups of CD rats having eight animals each were treated with uridine (15 mg/kg/die i.p.) and haloperidol (1 mg/kg/die i.p.) with the following treatment schedule. The first group was treated with haloperidol and uridine at the above indicated doses, for fifteen days. Only uridine was administered for the successive six days.

[0034] The second group was treated with the same method as the first group, however substituting a saline solution in lieu of uridine, so that group number 2 was treated only with the neuroleptic drug.

[0035] Group number 3 substituted saline solution in lieu of haloperidol with respect to group number 1.

[0036] Group number 4 was treated with saline solution in substitution both for uridine and haloperidol.

[0037] As stated hereinbefore, the treatment with haloperidol was interrupted after 15 days and, after washing out for seven days during which the uridine administration was continued, the animal was anaesthetized. A probe having on its tip a dialysis membrane 2 mm long, was implanted into the striated muscle and continuously perfused with Ringer solution by means of a microinfusion pump.

[0038] Samples of perfusate were collected every twenty minutes and immediately analyzed by high pressure liquid chromatography with electrochemical detector and inverted phase column, for the measurement of the DA levels.

[0039] Once the stabilization of the measured DA level had been obtained (about 6 samples), haloperidol was administered (2 mg/kg i.p.) and, after 100 minutes, methyl-amphetamine 1.5 mg/kg s.c., in order to evaluate the release of DA by the striatal synaptic terminals.

[0040] The test results are referred in Table 2 hereinafter, where the DA levels are expressed in percent of basal values.
TABLE 2
DA levels in % of basal level
Time (min) Administration Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
0 HP --- --- --- ---
20   100± 10* 125± 10* 95± 10* 200± 35
40   105± 15* 155± 10 75± 5* 175± 15
60   97± 10* 155± 30 85± 5* 160± 25
80   98± 20* 125± 28 90± 15* 170± 18
100 MAA 85± 10* 120± 18 92± 10* 110± 10
120   500±150 950±150 1000±150 1300±500
140   1000±400 1950±350* 950±200 700±200
160   800±300 1650±100* 850±150 550±150
NOTE:
HP = haloperidol (2 mg/kg, i.p.)
MAA = methylamphetamine (1.5 mg/kg, s.c.)
* p<0.05 (Dunn test) in comparison with saline


[0041] The results on Table 2 above show that, after administration of haloperidol, both the control animals (group 4) and those chronically treated with haloperidol (group 2) considerably increase the levels of dopamine released into the brain for at least eighty minutes. On the contrary, both the animals treated with uridine, and those treated with uridine and haloperidol, show levels of cerebral dopamine similar to the basal values. This indicates that a chronical administration of uridine is able to "break" the dopamine release effected by haloperidol.

[0042] Similarly, it has also shown that through the stimulation by methylamphetamine, a chronical use of uridine is able to block a hyperstimulation of DA release effected by haloperidol (Group 2 versus Group 1).

[0043] The above tests on animals have consequently shown that uridine, by increasing the levels of CCK in the brain, improves the dopaminergic functioning and blocks the side effects of neuroleptic drugs, in particular haloperidol.

3. Clinical tests



[0044] To evaluate whether the pharmacologic effects of uridine could result in a therapeutical confirmation, the compound was administered to a group of 40 psychotic subjects.

[0045] As it is well known in the medical practice that the neuroleptic drugs very often produce side effects of Parkinsonian type, such as rigidity, tremors and the like, and for this reason it is usual to associate antiParkinson drugs to the antipsychotic drugs, the experimental pattern was organized so as to be able to evaluate whether uridine, thanks to its pharmacological properties, was able to be substituted in lieu of the antiParkinson drug normally used.

[0046] Twenty psychotic subjects had been under treatment with neuroleptic drugs for various months and with antiParkinsonian drugs because Parkinsonian symptoms had appeared among them. In our test, the antiParkinsonian drug was substituted with uridine. Uridine was administered three times a day as 200 mg pills, along with haloperidol.

[0047] In twenty different psychotic subjects the treatment with antiParkinsonian drug was interrupted for two weeks (wash out), before starting a treatment based on uridine and haloperidol, at the same dosages as the above indicated group.

Results



[0048] In the first group of subjects, uridine has shown itself able to efficaciously substitute the antiParkinsonian drugs. In fact not one of the subjects has shown Parkinsonian symptoms in the two months period of treatment. In the absence of uridine, the tremor and rigidity symptoms usually appear within two to three weeks.

[0049] In the second group the tremor was already evident after the wash out period, before beginning the treatment with uridine.

[0050] With this treatment the Parkinsonian symptoms disappeared within the first ten days of treatment, and the symptoms did not reappear until two months after.

[0051] It can be concluded that uridine is a drug able to block the symptoms of Parkinson's disease when it is administered alone. Uridine is additionally able to inhibit the side effects of neuroleptic drugs, when it is administered together with the latter in a treatment of psychotic subjects.

[0052] The pharmaceutically active agent according to the present invention can be provided for clinical use in pharmaceutical compositions for oral administration under the form of tablets, pills, granules, capsules, drops, syrups and the like together with pharmaceutically acceptable excipients.

[0053] Moreover, the pharmaceutically active agent can be administered under the form of a pharmaceutical composition for parenteral administration, in the form of injectable solutes along with known pharmaceutically acceptable vehicles.

[0054] A preferred dosage for oral routes is 0.5-5 g/die referred to the pharmaceutically active agent.


Claims

1. Use of uridine for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of the Parkinson's disease.
 
2. Use of uridine according to claim 1, for the treatment of parkinsonian-type symptoms produced by a block of dopaminergic receptors.
 
3. Use according to claim 2, whereby uridine is used in association with a neuroleptic drug for the treatment of schizophrenia.
 
4. Use of uridine according to claim 3, in which said neuroleptic drug is haloperidol.
 
5. Use of uridine for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of disorders due to a decrease functioning of the cerebral dopaminergic system in the elderly.
 
6. Use of uridine according to claim 5, in which said disorders are due to a decrease of the dopamine released in brain tissue.
 
7. Use of uridine according to claim 6, in which said disorders are due to a low level of cholecystokinin in the brain tissue.
 
8. Use of uridine according to claim 5, for the treatment of a cerebral disorder which needs an increase of cholecystokinin at the cerebral level.
 


Ansprüche

1. Verwendung von Uridin bei der Herstellung eines Arzneimittels für die Behandlung der Parkinson-Krankheit.
 
2. Verwendung von Uridin nach Anspruch 1 zur Behandlung von Parkinson-Symptomen, die durch eine Blockierung der dopaminergischen Rezeptoren hervorgerufen werden.
 
3. Verwendung nach Anspruch 2, wobei Uridin zusammen mit einem neuroleptischen Arzneimittel zur Behandlung der Schizophrenie verwendet wird.
 
4. Verwendung von Uridin nach Anspruch 3, wobei das neuroleptische Arzneimittel Haloperidol ist.
 
5. Verwendung von Uridin zur Herstellung eines Arzneimittels zur Behandlung von Störungen, die im Alter durch eine verminderte Funktion des dopaminergischen Systemes im Gehirn verursacht wird.
 
6. Verwendung von Uridin nach Anspruch 5, wobei die Störungen auf einer Abnahme des vom Gehirngewebe freigesetzten Dopamins beruhen.
 
7. Verwendung von Uridin nach Anspruch 6, wobei die Störungen durch einen verminderten Gehalt von Cholecystokinin im Gehirngewebe hervorgerufen werden.
 
8. Verwendung von Uridin nach Anspruch 5, für eine Behandlung von Störungen des Gehirns bei der eine Erhöhung des Cholcystokinins im Gehirn notwending ist.
 


Revendications

1. Utilisation d'uridine pour la fabrication d'un médicament pour le traitement de la maladie de Parkinson.
 
2. Utilisation d'uridine selon la revendication 1 pour le traitement des symptomes de type parkinsonien causés par un blocage des récepteurs dopaminergigues.
 
3. Utilisation selon la revendication 2, où l'uridine est utilisée en association avec un médicament neuroleptique pour le traitement de la schizophrénie.
 
4. Utilisation d'uridine selon la revendication 3, où le médicament neuroleptique est l'halopéridole.
 
5. Utilisation d'uridine pour la fabrication d'un médicament pour le traitement de troubles causés par un abaissement du fonctionnement, chez la personne agée, du système dopaminergique célébral.
 
6. Utilisation d'uridine selon la revendication 5, où lesdits troubles sont causes par une diminution de la dopamine relâchée dans le tissu cérébral.
 
7. Utilisation d'uridine selon la revendication 6, où lesdits troubles sont causées par un bas niveau de cholécystoquinine dans le tissu cérébral.
 
8. Utilisation d'uridine selon la revendication 5 pour le traitement d'un trouble cérébral gui requiert une augmentation de cholécystoquinine au niveau cérébral.