[0001] This invention relates to a new and improved method and apparatus for rapidly sharpening
knives and similar tools to create a superior cutting edge. As used herein, the term
knife shall be defined to include any sort of blade such as chisels, plane edges,
scissors, razor blades, and similar precision edges or cutting tools. The application
is a divisional of EPA 85102761.5.
[0002] There are a wide variety of known means for sharpening knives some of which are discussed
in EPA 851027599. The large number and wide variety of existing means discussed in
that application for sharpening knives is testimony to the complexity and difficulty
of sharpening knives in a fast, convenient, and satisfactory way that will consistently
produce a sharp cutting edge. There is today in fact no known available means for
the unskilled to produce rapidly and consistently razor-like cutting edges on knives.
[0003] Rapid sharpening requires a means to remove rapidly the material of composition of
the knife -- often a high carbon steel or a stainless steel. The rate of metal removal
is related to the inherent hardness of the abrasive used, the particle size, or grit
as it is commonly called, of the abrasive, the applied pressure on the knife edge,
and the linear velocity of the abrasive particles across the edge being formed or
sharpened. The hardest material commonly used for metal removal is diamond with a
hardness of 10 on the Mohs' scale, compared to about 5.5 or so for many steel alloy
knives. Other materials such as alumina, high density alpha alumina, carborundum,
certain natural stones and the like also are harder than most steels and hence can
be used for sharpening through abrasive action against the metal.
[0004] Creation of the finest cutting edges on the order of one tenthousandth (1/10,000)
of an inch in width can be accomplished with these abrasive compositions, but a fine
grit must be used and the velocity of the abrasive must be held below a critical limit
to avoid overheating the thin and fine edge being created by the abrasive action.
An abrasive system and apparatus designed to create fine edges such as that described
in the copending application cited above will remove metal at a rate lower than a
system where the abrasive particles are larger and moving at higher velocities.
[0005] Because creation of the finest cutting edges involves inherently a slower metal removal
rate, any process designed to create such edges is not optimum for the task of initial
metal removal such as where a knife is first being formed or where the blade is particularly
dull. Consequently, to reduce the total elapsed time needed with a very dull knife
to create a thin and fine edge of a thickness limited only by the composition of knife
and its crystalline structure, one usually resorts to a series of different and time
consuming grinding and sharpening operations. None of the integrated sharpening equipment
existent today are satisfactory for the rapid generation of fine edges on the order
of 1/10,000 inch on otherwise very dull knives.
[0006] Much prior art has been concerned with disk type sharpeners for rapid sharpening
such as described in U.S. Patent No. 3,680,264. They have proved unsatisfactory because
of serious control problems inherent with disks which manifest difficulties in positioning
the knife accurately, in controlling the angular relationship of the knife with the
disk face, and in creating excessive heating of the knife edge during sharpening.
A most serious disadvantage has been the tendency of the disk to "grab" the knife
when its edge is rested on the flat surface of the disk and to grind undesirable scallops
or grooves along the knife edge in an uncontrolled manner. Such grabbing occurs if
there is instability in the control of the angle that the knife face makes with the
disk face, or inadequate means to hold the knife edge parallel to the flat surface
of the disk, or poor control over the consistency of force applied to the knife edge
by the disk or operator during sharpening.
[0007] A major cause of poor sharpening with disk sharpeners is poor control of knife angle
relative to the rotating disk such as exemplified in prior art U.S. Patent No. 2,496,139
that actually allows the knife guide to wobble and the sharpening angle to be determined
more by operator skill or by the knife width and thickness. Poor control of the knife
edge parallel to disk face or poor control of the angle of knife face relative to
the principal plane of a disk sharpener is unacceptable if one wishes to optimize
blade edge sharpness and to avoid gouging.
[0008] To minimize such uncontrolled gouging and grabbing of knives sharpened with disks,
the prior art commonly has resorted to maintaining contact of the knife edge only
with the corner edge of the disk such as described in U.S. Patent No. 3,334,446 and
deliberately avoiding a planar contact between the knife edge facet and the disk face
perpendicular to its axis of rotation. In that patent the described disk is spring
loaded to help reduce gouging and the knife is positioned on a rigid holder by means
of a leaf spring pressing against the knife. A guiding means in this sharpener on
one side of the disk edge limits the movement of the knife toward the disk. Even with
these precautions, by deliberately avoiding planar contact with the disk face perpendicular
to its axis of rotation there is only a point or limited line of contact between the
blade and abrasive during sharpening and there is a strong tendency to gouge the knife
edge. The abrasive passes the knife edge in essentially one fixed direction which
leaves burrs and unacceptable large serrations on the blade edge.
[0009] A common version of this approach is described in U.S. Patent No. 2,775,075 where
the edge of the abrasive disk is beveled to enlarge the line of contact along that
bevel of the knife edge with the abrasive. The tendency of such sharpeners to gouge
knife blades is well known and at best the resulting knife edge is poorly defined
and serrated. In all such sharpeners the abrasive passes the knife edge in essentially
one fixed direction which creates the serrations and a sizeable burr on the knife
edge.
[0010] A complex sharpener covered by U.S. Patent No. 2,519,351 contains two pair, a total
of four (4) abrasive blocks, one pair of which is biased to move toward the other,
that sharpens by a reciprocating rectilinear motion simultaneously both cutting edge
facets of a knife. The knife is held by three sets of jaws in a positioning means
designed to be free floating in lateral position between the abrasive pairs and to
moderate insertion of the blade into the positioning means by engaging the sides of
the knife in one or more of three (3) grooved blocks. In addition to its complexity
this sharpener has the disadvantages inherent in all rectilinear motion sharpeners
which leaves a serrated knife edge which cuts by tearing and has poor wear characteristics.
The free floating design of the positioning means and the inherent tendency of the
two cutting edge facets of the blade to jam in the grooved block makes this inapplicable
in virtually any other sharpener. Because both sides of the knife or sides of its
cutting edge facets are used to moderate the degree of knife insertion into the sharpener,
and because of the free floating lateral motion, this prior art positioning means
is inapplicable where a precise positioning of the knife edge is necessary. The degree
of insertion of the knife edge and hence its position depends on the width of the
knife, on the width and angle of its cutting edge facet and on the degree of manual
pressure applied during insertion and movement of the knife.
[0011] U.S. Patent No. 2,751,721 describes a sharpener with a drum shaped abrasive element
where the knife cutting edge facet is sharpened against annular portion of the drum
surface that rotates in a plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the drum.
The abrading force on the cutting edge is determined solely by the degree of hand
pressure applied to the knife by the operator which leads to significant inconsistencies
in abrading rate, poor edge formation, and gouging of the edge -- problems common
to much of the prior art. Position and stability of the knife within the holder and
angular control of the cutting edge facet against the abrasive surface is poor because
of their dependency on the amount of pressure applied by the operator and by the profile
of the several bevel faces common to the existent variety of commonly available knives.
[0012] U.S. Patent No. 2,645,063 describes a sharpener with a drum surface and a guide mechanism
which provides stops that position the knife by bearing directly on the cutting edge
itself. Such stops are impractical because of the constant dulling effect on the edge
created by rubbing it directly across and normal to one surface of the guide. This
patent and U.S. Patent No. 2,751,721 describe sharpeners that incorporate a magnet.
The magnetic field does not support or guide the knife.
[0013] Many of the problems associated with the rapid generation of thin fine edges on dull
knives and other blades are overcome with the method and apparatus described here
which include precision control of sharpening steps employing an improved disk sharpener.
[0014] In accordance with the invention there is provided a knife sharpening apparatus comprising
a housing, a first sharpening section and a second sharpening section in said housing,
a rotatable shaft in said first sharpening section, a disk mounted on said rotatable
shaft, abrasive particles on a surface of said disk, guide means in said housing opposite
said surface of said disk, said second sharpening section having a sharpening member
with a pair of flat outer faces having abrasive particles thereon, drive means for
orbitally driving said sharpening member, and second sharpening section guide means
in said housing opposite respective outer faces of its sharpening member.
[0015] The invention also provides a method of sharpening a knife having a cutting edge
facet comprising placing the knife against a first inclined guide surface at a first
angle in a first sharpening section of a housing with the cutting edge facet against
abrasive particles on a surface of a disk mounted on a rotatable shaft, rotating the
shaft to rotate the disk surface and sharpen the cutting edge facet, removing the
knife from the surface of the disk, the cutting edge facet being against abrasive
particles on a second surface of the disk assembly mounted on the rotatable shaft,
rotating the shaft to rotate the second surface of the disk assembly and further pre-sharpen
the cutting edge facet, placing the knife against an inclined second guide surface
in a second section of the housing with the cutting edge facet against abrasive particles
on a first face of a sharpening member, orbitally driving the sharpening member to
further sharpen the cutting edge facet, removing the knife from the first face of
the sharpening member, placing the knife against an inclined further guide surface
in the second sharpening section with the cutting edge facet being against abrasive
particles on a second face of the sharpening member with the further guide surface
inclined at a mirror image angle to the second guide surface which differs from the
angle of the first sharpening guide surface, and orbitally driving the sharpening
member while the knife is against the further guide surface.
[0016] The use of the knife sharpening apparatus as described here can produce quickly in
hands of the inexperienced well defined and reasonably sharp edge with reduced risk
of gouging, overheating, or damaging the general contour and shape of the knife edge.
A very thin and finer edge can be generated quickly. Most effective use of these methods
and apparatus depends critically on the control of sharpening angle in each step.
[0017] In accordance with the method of the invention the use of a disk sharpener which
removes large masses of metal is followed by further sharpening with an orbiting sharpener
incorporating an accurate knife guide or hold which permits rapid further metal removal
for creation of a knife edge on the order of 1/10,000 inch or less in thickness. The
ultimate width of the edge is established primarily by the properties and quality
of steel or other material used in the knife. The guide, preferably magnetic, used
to position the knife in this orbital sharpening step commonly positions the face
of the knife relative to the plane of the orbiting abrasive surface at an angle, referred
to herein as the second sharpening angle, preferably larger than the first sharpening
angle between the face of the knife and the plane of the abrasive disk used in the
preceding disk sharpening step, referred to herein as the first sharpening angle.
This will cause the orbiting abrasive to sharpen the knife cutting edge facets at
a slightly greater total included angle than their existing total angle after the
disk sharpener.
[0018] The combination of disk and orbital sharpening is unique because of the overall speed
with which a very fine edge is formed. The disk sharpener disclosed here can quickly
preform the knife edge which is then passed through the orbital sharpener to develop
rapidly a razor like edge.
[0019] The invention will be more fully understood from the following description when read
together with the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0020]
Fig. 1 is a plan view of a combined disk sharpener and a two stage orbiting sharpener
in a single apparatus constructed according to this invention.
Fig. 2 is a cross sectional elevation view taken along line 2-2 of Fig. 1 of a combined
disk sharpener and a two stage orbiting sharpener in a single apparatus constructed
according to this invention.
Fig. 3 is an elevation view of yet a further embodiment of this invention.
Fig. 4 is a cross-sectional view taken through Figure 3 along the line 4-4.
Fig. 5 is a cross sectional view of a knife with a 45° total angle at edge indicating
sharpening to be made at 34° by the disk sharpener.
Fig. 6 is a cross sectional view of resultant knife with a 34° total angle at edge
formed by first stage disk sharpener indicating sharpening to 40° in the next orbital
sharpening step according to this invention.
Fig. 7 is a cross sectional view of a resultant knife showing the 34° and 40° angles
formed along cutting edge facets formed respectively by the disk sharpening step and
the first orbital sharpening step, according to this invention.
Fig. 8 is a cross sectional view of the knife cutting edge facet (high enlargement)
showing the resulting 34° and 40°angles formed along the cutting edge facets and indicating
a 45° total angle to be placed on the cutting edge facets by second orbiting sharpening
step.
Fig. 9 is a cross sectional view of finished knife cutting edge facets with 34°, 40°
and 45° angles formed on the facets as created by the disk sharpener followed by two
orbiting sharpening steps according to this invention.
[0021] The apparatus as shown in Figures 1 and 2 combines a disc sharpener and an orbital
sharpener into a single sharpener that can be used by the inexperienced to produce
reliably and rapidly razor-sharp edges.
[0022] Base plate 22b, Figure 2, supports motor 24b, fastened to base plate 22b by screws
or other means (not shown), whose left shaft 26b drives disk holder 28b on which is
mounted abrasive disk 30b that rotates about 3000 RPM but at a maximum surface abrasive
circumferential velocity of less than about 800 ft./minute to reduce the risk of overheating
the knife edge. Fan 100 mounted on shaft 26b serves to cool motor 24b. Air enters
the apparatus through the annulus 102 between upper cover 104 and lower cover 106
and exhausts out a base opening 108 in the base plate 22b which is supported on rubber
feet 32b.
[0023] Vertical support members 34b, 112, and 36b, Figure 12, secured to base 22b by structural
adhesive or screws (not shown) support upper horizontal support member 116 which in
turn supports the knife guide assembly 118 through the knife guide base 120 that is
fastened securely to upper horizontal support member 116 by one or more screws 122
as shown. Drive gear pulley 124 mounted on right armature shaft extension 44b, Figure
2, drives two gear pulleys 126 (one shown) synchronously by means of timing belt 128
(toothed). The armature shaft extension 44b and shafts 130 for attached gear pulleys
126, ride in sleeve bearings 132 inserted into vertical support members 112 and 36b.
A more detailed description of the orbiting drive system is included in the copending
patent application cited above. Two synchronously driven cranks 134 machined onto
the end of shafts 130 ride within the glass filled fluorocarbon sleeve bearings 138
inserted in drive plate 136 and generate an orbital motion of drive plate 136. There
are shown in Figure 2 two sets of the three (3) or more support bearings 139 held
by bracket 141, horizontal support member 116, and support 36b bear slidingly on drive
plate 136 to hold drive plate 136 in a vertical plane with minimum motion transverse
to that plane as described in the patent application heretofore referred to. Attached
to drive plate 136 by means of screw 140 is an orbiting yoke assembly 142 which has
upper arms 144 on which is mounted orbiting abrasive material 146. Through this structure
the orbital motion generated in drive plate 136 creates orbital motion of abrasive
material 146.
[0024] The knife guide assembly 118, Figures 1 and 2, contains plastic structures 148 that
support magnetic elements 150 which attract and establish a guide plane for the face
of the knife. The knife guide assembly 118 also includes knife stops 152, shown in
Figure 1, that serves a variety of functions as described in the application cited
above. The knife guide 50b used with the abrasive disk 30b contains plastic supporting
structure 154 that extends and contacts the face of enclosure 60b. It contains a magnetic
element 62b to control the angle of the face of knife relative to the abrasive disk
30b. The magnetic element 62b which attracts the knife and establishes a guide plane
for the face of the knife. In use the cutting edge facet of the knife placed on guide
50b rests on the stop 54b on the face of enclosure 60b. The drive cranks 134 can be
an integral part of shaft 130 as described above or be a separate part affixed thereto.
The motor 24b, Figure 2, must be selected such that its armature and shaft 26b, which
on the right of the motor is shown as armature shaft extension 44b, has sufficient
end-play to allow the necessary movement or displacement of disk 30b in direction
along its axis of rotation to accommodate without reaching a travel-limit the thickest
knife to be sharpened. Free end-play on the order of 1/16 inch has proven adequate
with most knives to allow the disk 30b to be displaced to the right in Figure 2 without
reaching the limit of travel permitted by the free end-play.
[0025] In this manner, when a knife is inserted between the guide 50b, Figure 2, and the
rotating abrasive disk 30b so that the knife cutting edge facet rests on stops 54b,
the disk 30b is displaced to the right and it is floating against the biasing force
of spring 42b that applies that force to shaft extension 44b through thrust bearing
46b which force is transmitted through the motor armature to shaft 26b and to the
disk 30b. Without adequate free end-play in the motor armature displacement of the
disk 30b could force the motor armature against its internal stop, not shown, which
is usually a thrust bearing, and the disk displacement would then be stopped, thereby
generating excessively high forces on the knife by the rotating abrasive disk 30b
causing gouging or other physical damage to the knife edge. The spring loading concept
employed here in conjunction with the stops 54b on the face of enclosure 60b and the
blade guide system provides relatively constant force on the blade edge while being
sharpened and uniform sharpening action along the length of knife edge without gouging.
The enclosure 60b for the disk shown on lower left is designed to provide a safety
cover and structure for stops 54b but without interfering with free knife edge insertion
between disk 30b and guide 50b and free contact of the cutting edge facet against
the surface of disk 30b.
[0026] By combining the two types of sharpeners into a single apparatus it is possible to
incorporate knife guides that optimize the sequential sharpening angles ⊖ in a manner
that provides the unskilled with a highly sophisticated contour on the cutting edge
facets and a knife of superior cutting performance. Angle ⊖ is determined by the plane
of the guide face on which the blade rests and the plane of the moving abrasive surface,
described in the patent application cited above. It was found that by using a carefully
controlled and slightly larger sharpening angle in successive sharpening steps it
is possible to decrease markedly the total sharpening time and insure a superior cutting
edge on the blade. Although not essential it is preferable that the construction of
the knife guides for the disk and subsequent orbiting abrasive sharpening steps be
very similar so as to position and hold the knife in an essentially uniform manner
in each sharpening position except for deliberate changes in the sharpening angle.
[0027] Many factory produced kitchen knives have, by way of example, a total cutting angle
as formed by the intersection of cutting edge facets greater than 40°. Only rarely
does the owner know the actual total angle of cutting edge facets, so any practical
means for sharpening must be capable of rapid and foolproof sharpening independent
of and without knowledge of the initial edge angle. If it is desired to produce a
razor edge, a fine grit abrasive is desirable for finishing the knife, but fine abrasives
remove metal slowly. If one did know the initial total angle of the edge facets of
the knife and could control the sharpening angle, it would be feasible and practical
to use fine abrasive and sharpen the knife at an angle 1-2 degrees greater than the
initial angle so that only little metal need by removed and only in the immediate
vicinity of the edge. However, repeated resharpening would have to be done at ever
increasing angles if one is to avoid need to remove large quantities of metal, and
such resharpenings would ultimately result in a blunt, dull knife. The present invention
addresses this problem for the first time in a manner that insures rapid sharpening
of a blade to a razor sharp edge without prior knowledge of the initial angle of the
cutting edge. To accomplish this, the blade is given an initial sharpening with a
coarse grit disk sharpener but at a precisely determined edge angle that is less than
the sharpening angles used in the orbital sharpener that uses generally a finer grit
size, a lower velocity of the abrasive elements, and the unique orbital motion that
produces a razor-like edge.
[0028] To illustrate the advantages of this invention in an actual sharpening case and referring
to Figure 5 and assuming, by way of example, the knife to be sharpened has its cutting
edge facets meeting at an initial total angle of 45°, a popular angle for kitchen
knives, it is desirable first that the disk sharpener sharpen the knife to create
a precisely known total angle at the knife edge as established by the two cutting
edge facets. This angle should be less than the angle to be created on the facet in
subsequent orbiting sharpening stages. A convenient angle of choice might be 34° by
way of this example as shown in Figure 5. This sharpening step entails removal of
a substantial amount of metal from the edge, a task the disk sharpener with say 100-180
grit is ideally suited to do rapidly with creation of only little burr on the edge.
If by chance the initial total blade angle were less than 34°, the disk sharpener
would nevertheless generate a 34° angle on the blade. The resulting blade edge shown
in Figure 6 with a 34° total included angle then can be sharpened to a razor edge
in either a one step or multiple step orbital sharpener. The use of two orbital sharpener
steps following disk sharpening makes is possible to use first a faster-working coarser
grit followed by a finer grit to leave a smoother edge.
[0029] Illustrating with a two step orbital sharpener, first the knife of Figure 6 with
a 34° total angle is sharpened to a 40° total angle which can be done rapidly with
an orbiting abrasive of about 180 grit. This step need entail removal of only a small
amount of metal near the edge of the cutting edge facets as seen in Figure 6, compared
to the amount of metal removed in the preceding disk sharpener operation. The resulting
blade Figure 7 has a 34° total angle along the rear of the cutting edge facet and
a 40° total angle nearer to the cutting edge itself. In the final orbital sharpening
step we can for example use a finer abrasive of say about 600-1500 grit, to recreate
the original 45° angle adjacent to the very cutting edge as seen in Figure 8 (enlarged)
by removal of only very little additional metal. Because this series of sharpening
steps is incorporated in a single apparatus, it is possible for the manufacturer to
incorporate precision knife guides that sharpen in each successive step with a slightly
greater angle so that only the disk sharpener has the burden of removing substantial
quantities of metal. The orbiting sharpener has to remove only relatively smaller
amounts of metal while placing a fine edge on the knife. Each sharpening step is employed
to do what it can do best and the overall result for the inexperienced is rapid formation
of a knife with a fine, razor-like edge. The resulting knife edge of this example
shown in Fig. 9 and highly enlarged compared to the scale of starting blade of Figure
6 has three micro bevels along each cutting edge facet 70 that form total angles of
34°, 40°, and 45° respective as one views the knife cutting edge facets at positions
progressively closer to the cutting edge. Because that length along the cutting edge
facet that is beveled at 45° is very small, usually less than 0.030 inches, it can
be sharpened rapidly with the fine grit orbital sharpener leaving essentially no burr
on the edge. Any final micro-burr on the blade edge can be readily removed by pushing
the knife edge over and in sliding contact with the knife stops 152 of Figure 11 before
the blade edge facet is abraded by the orbiting abrasive 146. For resharpening a knife
once sharpened as described the orbital positions designed to create the 40° and 45°
total angles will usually regenerate quickly a fine superior edge without recourse
to the disk sharpening stage, and only after a series of resharpenings or hard use
would it be necessary to use the lower angle disk sharpener again.
[0030] A knife sharpened as just described has a significantly superior cutting quality
compared to knives sharpened by more conventional means. A knife sharpened according
to this example will have three distinct micro bevels on the cutting edge facet as
shown in Figure 10. Superior cutting qualities of a cutting edge facet with multiple
micro bevels are attributable to the fact that the decreasing bevel angles toward
the rear of the cutting edge facet offers angular relieve immediately behind the edge
that allows the material being cut to tend to move away from or to bear less firmly
on the rear portion of the cutting edge facet. A knife with appropriate micro cutting
edge facets as created by this invention can remove readily a very fine shaving of
material from the surface of a material as contrast to a greater tendency of a knife
to split the surface and dig below the surface if the cutting edge facets are planar
as a result of being sharpened only at a single angle.
[0031] One can see from the foregoing the uniqueness of combining the new improved disk
sharpener with the orbiting sharpener in a single apparatus. Even a very dull knife
can be sharpened rapidly by the inexperienced and the resulting knife edge is razor
sharp on the order of 1/10,000 inch wide.
[0032] Figures 3 and 4 show an alternative form of the invention using a split disk arrangement.
The double disk design has proven particularly effective to permit the operator to
sharpen conveniently both cutting edge facets of a knife from the same side of the
sharpener. In this arrangement two disks 30d, 30d are secured and positioned back
to back on a driven shaft 26d and held apart against stops in their rest positions
by a biasing mechanism, such as spring 100, located between the two disks forcing
the disks apart. Travel of each disk along the shaft axis is limited in one direction
by the stop or pin 101 located on the shaft and in the other direction by the position
of the second disk or the biasing mechanism. The permissible travel of each disk against
the biasing mechanism and toward the opposite disk must be sufficient to avoid the
possibility of the disk reaching its limit of travel against the biasing mechanism
at any time while the knife being sharpened is displacing the disk against the biasing
mechanism. The disks secured to the stops can slide independently on their common
shaft while each is forced to rotate at the shaft speed by a pin 101 fastened to or
through the shaft, that engages within a slotted portion 102 of the hub of each disk.
That pin 101 also can serve as a stop to control position of the disks in this rest
position. Other means of driving the disks at shaft speed while allowing the disks
to slide on the shaft will be obvious to those skilled in mechanical arts. Abrasive
mounted on the outside faces of each disk 30d, 30d rotating on the shaft 26d is pressed
against the knife cutting-edge facet during sharpening by a force determined by the
spring or other biasing means. For a given knife and type abrasive, the rate of metal
removal during sharpening depends on the biasing force and on the size and speed of
the abrasive particles.
[0033] Although not illustrated in Figure 3, it is to be understood that the stops as shown
in EPA 85102761.5 may be extended sufficiently toward the disks to prevent the knife
blade from being inserted too far and to provide support for the vertical facet. These
stops thus would limit the degree of insertion of the knife and limit the displacement
of the disk against the spring.
[0034] The invention may also be used by mounting any suitable number of disks on each shaft
to achieve different types of abrading action such as coarse and fine or any intermediate
treatments.
18. A knife sharpening apparatus comprising a housing, a first sharpening section
and a second sharpening section in said housing, a rotatable shaft in said first sharpening
section, a disk mounted on said rotatable shaft, abrasive particles on a surface of
said disk, guide means in said housing opposite said surface of said disk, said second
sharpening section having a sharpening member with a pair of flat outer faces having
abrasive particles thereon, drive means for orbitally driving said sharpening member,
and second sharpening section guide means in said housing opposite respective outer
faces of its sharpening member.
2. Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the guide means for the disk has a guide
surface at an angle to said disk, and the second sharpening section guide means have
guide surfaces at mirror image angles to each other with said mirror image angles
differing from the guide surface angle of the first sharpening section.
3. Apparatus according to claim 1 or 2, which includes a second disc mounted on the
rotatable shaft, both of said discs being slidably mounted on said shaft and each
having a back face and a front face perpendicularly to said shaft, said back faces
of said disks being disposed toward each other and said front faces being disposed
remote from each other, resilient means between said back faces and reacting against
said discs for urging said front faces away from each other, stop means on said shaft
for limiting the sliding motion of said disk assemblies imparted by said resilient
means, a slot in each of said discs terminating short of said back faces leaving a
wall portion, said stop means comprising a pin mounted to said shaft and located in
each of said slots whereby said pins function to halt the motion of said disks when
contacted by said wall portions and to prevent relative rotation of said disks with
respect to said shaft for causing said disks to rotate with said shaft, and abrasive
means on said front faces.
4. Apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 3, which includes a third sharpening
section, a sharpening member in said third sharpening section, said third sharpening
section sharpening member having a pair of flat outer faces with abrasive particles
mounted thereon, drive means for orbitally driving said third sharpening section sharpening
member, guide means for each of said third sharpening section sharpening member outer
faces at mirror image angles to each other, and said mirror image angles of said third
sharpening section guide means being different than the guide surface angles of the
first sharpening and second sharpening sections.
5. Apparatus of claim 4, wherein the guide surface angles of the third sharpening
section are greater than the guide surface angles of the second sharpening section
which in turn is greater than said guide surface angle of the first sharpening section.
6. Apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the drive means for orbitally driving the
sharpening member of each of the second and third sharpening sections imparts an orbital
velocity to each of its particles of no greater than 800 feet/minute.
7. Apparatus according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said abrasive particles
are diamond particles with generally flat surfaces.
8. A method of sharpening a knife having a cutting edge facet comprising placing the
knife against a first inclined guide surface at a first angle in a first sharpening
section of a housing with the cutting edge facet against abrasive particles on a surface
of a disk mounted on a rotatable shaft, rotating the shaft to rotate the disk surface
and sharpen the cutting edge facet, removing the knife from the surface of the disk,
the cutting edge facet being against abrasive particles on a second surface of the
disk assembly mounted on the rotatable shaft, rotating the shaft to rotate the second
surface of the disk assembly and further pre-sharpen the cutting edge facet, placing
the knife against an inclined second guide surface in a second section of the housing
with the cutting edge facet against abrasive particles on a first face of a sharpening
member, orbitally driving the sharpening member to further sharpen the cutting edge
facet, removing the knife from the first face of the sharpening member, placing the
knife against an inclined further guide surface in the second sharpening section with
the cutting edge facet being against abrasive particles on a second face of the sharpening
member with the further guide surface inclined at a mirror image angle to the second
guide surface which differs from the angle of the first sharpening guide surface,
and orbitally driving the sharpening member while the knife is against the further
guide surface.
9. A method according to claim 8, including a third sharpening section in the sharpener
having guide surfaces at mirror image angles different from the mirror image angles
of the second sharpening section for directing the knife edge against a second orbitally
driven sharpening member having abrasive particles on its exposed surfaces, including
the steps of removing the knife from the second sharpening section, placing the knife
against one of the third sharpening section guide surfaces with the knife against
the second sharpening member, orbitally driving the second sharpening member to impart
an orbital motion to the second sharpening member, removing the knife from the first
guide surface of the second honing section, placing the knife against a further guide
surface of the third sharpening section with the knife edge against the second sharpening
member, orbitally driving the second sharpening member, and the orbital driving of
both the first and second sharpening members imparting an orbital velocity to each
of their abrasive particles of no greater than 800 feet/minute.
10. A method according to claim 9, wherein the guide surface angle is increased from
the first to the second to the third sharpening sections.