| (19) |
 |
|
(11) |
EP 0 349 985 B1 |
| (12) |
EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION |
| (45) |
Mention of the grant of the patent: |
|
22.09.1993 Bulletin 1993/38 |
| (22) |
Date of filing: 04.07.1989 |
|
| (51) |
International Patent Classification (IPC)5: E04C 5/18 |
|
| (54) |
Spacer for reinforcing mesh and spiral reinforcement cages
Abstandshalter für Bewehrungsmatten und Spiralbewehrungskörben
Distanceur pour grillage d'armature et pour cages d'armature en spirale
|
| (84) |
Designated Contracting States: |
|
BE DE ES FR GB IT LU NL |
| (30) |
Priority: |
05.07.1988 US 215411
|
| (43) |
Date of publication of application: |
|
10.01.1990 Bulletin 1990/02 |
| (73) |
Proprietor: Swenson, Richard A. |
|
Ridgewood
New Jersey 07450 (US) |
|
| (72) |
Inventor: |
|
- Swenson, Richard A.
Ridgewood
New Jersey 07450 (US)
|
| (74) |
Representative: Weickmann, Heinrich, Dipl.-Ing. et al |
|
Patentanwälte
H. Weickmann, Dr. K. Fincke
F.A. Weickmann, B. Huber
Dr. H. Liska, Dr. J. Prechtel, Dr. B. Böhm
Postfach 86 08 20 81635 München 81635 München (DE) |
| (56) |
References cited: :
US-A- 1 498 595 US-A- 3 722 164 US-A- 4 452 026
|
US-A- 3 359 019 US-A- 4 005 560 US-A- 4 641 991
|
|
| |
|
|
- "Concrete Trader", February 1986, Columbus, Ohio, US
|
|
| |
|
| Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European
patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to
the European patent
granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall
not be deemed to
have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent
Convention).
|
[0001] The present invention relates to a spacer for concrete wire reinforcement and, more
particularly, to a reinforcement spacer which is adapted for use with all mesh and
cage spacings and wire gauges and which is readily installed by hand.
[0002] In the manufacture of reinforced concrete structures, such as concrete pipe, walls,
slabs, and the like, it is important that the steel reinforcement, typically in the
form of welded-wire mesh, be properly positioned in the cross section of the designed
structure. Improper positioning of the reinforcement degrades the structural integrity
of the unit and, in a severe case, can lead to structural failure. Moreover, as labor
skill and costs are significant factors in the manufacture of reinforced concrete
structures, it is also important that the positioning of the reinforcement be carried
out in as simple and straightforward, yet accurate, a manner as possible. A number
of efforts have been made in the past to develop techniques and equipent that facilitate
the correct placement of the steel reinforcement. Such efforts, however, have not
fully addressed the problems involved nor provided solutions for those problems.
[0003] One prior art device is described in the applicant's own prior US-A-3,471,986, which
issued on October 14, 1969. In the '986 patent, a spring-steel spacer clips over a
pair of parallel reinforcing wires and carries an outwardly extending V-shaped nose
that defines the spacing of the reinforcing mesh from the concrete mold wall, thereby
positioning the reinforcement relative to the surface (inner, outer, or both) of the
concrete structure. This spacer works quite well for fixed-spacing wire mesh, e.g.
50,8; 76,2 and 101,6 mm (2", 3", and 4") mesh, and has been successfully used with
such reinforcement for many years. However, the more recent development of variable-spacing
mesh, such as the spiral cages used in reinforced concrete pipe for example, has required
the use of spacers that are capable of use with spacings of variable and numerous
dimensions between wires.
[0004] A spring-wire spacer intended for use with variable-spacing wire mesh is described
in US-A-3,722,164, issued on March 27, 1973. This spacer includes a serpentine part
adapted to be engaged with the horizontal wire of the reinforcing mesh and two extension
parts, one which protrudes outward from the serpentine part and acts as a spacing
jack and the other which serves as a spring-loaded lever arm having a hook at its
upper end to engage a vertical wire to clip the spacer on the mesh. Although not limited
to a single-spacing mesh, this spacer has other disadvantages that impair its usefulness.
One, the spacing jack terminates in a sharp end, which can damage the mold surfaces
during fabrication and which, if extending through the concrete surface as sometimes
occurs, can damage adjacent materials during shipment and can also result in injury
to workmen during handling. Two, the spacing jack is a single wire protrusion extending
at a right angle to the mesh. As a result, it can impede the placement of the mold
over the wire mesh cage during fabrication and is also susceptible of being bent over.
In the latter case, the jack no longer provides the proper positioning of the mesh
relative to the mold surface. Also, the lever arm, which is gripped by hand during
installation of the spacer, affords only the thickness of the spring-wire as a hand
grip, and this can lead to difficulty and lost time in installation, as well as high
finger pressure.
[0005] Another reinforcement spacer adapted for use with diverse mesh spacings is illustrated
in US-A-4,452,026, issued June 5, 1984. In this spacer, two arms with oppositely facing
hooks at their ends extend at right angles from a shank part and engage a mesh vertical
wire on opposite sides. The upper end of the shank is looped over a horizontal wire,
so that the upper arm extends from behind the vertical wire at its shank end to overlie
the vertical wire at its hook end. The shank includes a U-shaped spacing projection
which extends at a right angle to the plane of the mesh. A second portion of the shank
connects the U-shaped projection to the lower arm and backs against the next adjacent
horizontal wire to impart a torsional retention force to the spacer when the lower
arm is snapped into position behind the vertical wire. While the spacer of the '026
patent avoids the problems attendant upon the use of a sharp-ended spacing projection,
it still does not afford a secure handgrip for easy, error free installation. It additionally
requires the use of the next adjacent horizontal wire as a backing wire for the torsion
arm of the spacer. This could interfere with the installation of the spacer in those
instances where the next adjacent wire is close to the lower arm. Also, the spacer
has a rather complex configuration, which could lead to confusion and error in installation.
[0006] The document "The Concrete Trader" of February 1986 already shows a spacer of the
kind indicated in the preamble of claim 1. From the drawing in this document it is
easily to be seen that the spacing projection is located adjacent the pigtail portion.
Due to the small distance of the spacing projection from the upper horizontal wire
the operator has no chance to bend the shank portion for hooking engagement by applying
a bending force to the spacing projection. The operator is rather obliged to apply
the bending force at the lower end of the shank portion, i.e. adjacent the hook portion,
to apply a sufficient bending torque permitting the hook portion to be hooked behind
the right hand vertical wire of the mesh. This means that the operator acts with his
thumb only on one single straight section of the shank portion and this further means
that the surface pressure onto the thumb necessary for bending the shank portion towards
a hooking-in position is very high.
[0007] The foregoing and other disadvantages of the prior art are overcome by the provision
of an improved reinforcement spacer for concrete structures which is formed as a unitary
stiff, but resilient, member having an upper pigtail portion for engagement with one
of a pair of intersecting reinforcement wires, a middle shank portion bearing a rounded
spacing projection for engagement with the surface of a concrete mold, and a lower
hook portion for engagement with the other of the intersecting pair of wires to securely
clamp the spacer in place on the wire reinforcement. (The terms "upper" and "lower"
are used here for convenience and clarity in describing the spacer and are not intended
as limitations in the actual use or orientation of the spacer in practice.) The pigtail
portion preferably extends to one side of the shank portion along an axis of curvature,
or spiral, and is formed such that, when hooked over a mesh wire, the shank portion
inclines away from the other intersecting mesh wire at a relatively small acute angle,
e.g. on the order of ten to twenty degrees or so. The nose-like projection of the
shank portion, in addition to its function of spacing the wire reinforcement from
the concrete mold surface, also serves as a convenient gripping surface for ready
installation of the spacer on the wire reinforcement. The worker need only grip the
spacer by the nose-like projection, hook the pigtail portion over one of the intersecting
wires, and then, without changing grip, swing the hook portion into engagement with
the other wire by pushing on the nose-like projection. The fact that the nose-like
spacing projection is located adjacent the hook portion provides a long lever arm
and thus little operating forces. The finger pressure forces are further reduced by
the fact that the finger abuts the two limbs 24a and 24b of the spacing projection
24 (see Fig. 7) instead of only one wire portion as compared with conventional devices.
[0008] As the spacer of the invention requires only one intersection of wires for installation,
it is usable with all mesh or cage spacings. It is likewise adapted for use with all
wire gauges. An added advantage in the latter respect is that, as wire gauge increases,
the construction of the spacer is such that the retention force tending to hold the
spacer in place on the wire reinforcement also increases. This means that the spacer
will inherently provide higher retention forces in high-load applications, where heavy
gauge reinforcement is typically used.
[0009] In a preferred embodiment, the spacer is formed of a single piece of spring steel
wire that is bent to define the pigtail, shank and hook portions. The pigtail portion
preferably includes a body portion that lies in a plane inclined at an acute angle
to the shank axis and terminates in an upright end portion that bends upwardly out
of the plane of the body portion. The shank portion is deformed adjacent its lower
end to form the nose-like spacing projection. The upper leg of the projection slopes
downwardly to facilitate the free flow of concrete over the spacer and to aid in guiding
the vertical placement of molds over reinforcement cages. The lower leg of the nose-like
projection merges into the hook portion, which itself is generally U-shaped and extends
to the same side of the shank portion as does the pigtail portion. The U-shaped channel
of the hook portion preferably opens back towards the shank portion so as to provide
a secure clamping engagement with the other wire of the reinforcement.
[0010] For a better understanding of the invention, reference may be made to the following
description of a representative embodiment thereof and to the accompanying drawings,
in which:
Fig. 1 is a front elevational view of a reinforcement spacer embodying the invention,
shown in the installed position on a welded-wire mesh reinforcement;
Fig. 2 is a side elevational view taken along the line 2-2 in Fig. 1 and looking in
the direction of the arrows;
Figs. 3, 4 and 5 are schematic views illustrating the steps involved in the installation
of a reinforcement spacer embodying the invention on a welded-wire mesh reinforcement;
Fig. 6 is a front view of a reinforcement spacer embodying the invention;
Fig. 7 is a side view taken along the line 7-7 in Fig. 6 and looking in the direction
of the arrows;
Fig. 8 is a vertical sectional view taken along the line 8-8 in Fig. 7 and looking
in the direction of the arrows; and
Fig. 9 is a sectional view taken along the line 9-9 in Fig. 8 and looking in the direction
of the arrows.
[0011] For purposes of illustration, a representative embodiment of the invention is described
hereinbelow in the context of the manufacture of precast reinforced concrete pipe.
It will be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to that particular
use, but has general application to the positioning of wire reinforcement in concrete
or other cast structures.
[0012] As shown in Figs. 1 and 2, a reinforcement spacer 10 constructed in accordance with
the invention is formed as a single, unitary member including, in general, a pigtail
portion 12, a shank portion 14, and a hook portion 16. It is a feature of the invention
that the spacer 10 may be economically fabricated as a simple wire form of a stiff
but resilient material. For example, a high carbon hard drawn steel wire (e.g. C-1065)
of approximately 3,81 mm (0.150 inches) diameter has been found satisfactory for the
manufacture of small to medium size reinforced concrete pipe. Other materials and
wire sizes may be used to suit the strength requirements of a given application.
[0013] The spacer 10 is illustrated in Figs. 1 and 2 as installed on a welded-wire mesh
reinforcement 18 formed by intersecting horizontal wires 20 and vertical wires 22
(only one of which is shown). As best seen in Fig. 2, the shank portion 14 is deformed
at the lower end thereof (as seen in Fig. 2) as an outwardly and downwardly sloping
spacing, or nose, portion 24 that is bent at its lower end along a radius of curvature
to extend back towards the axis of the shank 14 and then merge into the hook portion
16. In the most commonly installed orientation, i.e., with the pigtail portion 12
at the top, the sloping upper leg 24a of the nose portion 24 serves to permit the
free flow of concrete downward over the mesh or cage 18 without obstruction by the
spacer 10. It also serves to guide the molds in those cases when they are put in place
vertically over the mesh or cage 18. The extent of projection of the nose beyond the
shank portion 14 defines the distance between the mesh 18 and the adjacent surface
of the mold, shown schematically at 26 in Fig. 2, for the concrete pipe.
[0014] The spacer 10 is depicted in Figs. 1 and 2 as installed on a wire mesh or cage 18
in which the vertical wires 22 are on the inside of the horizontal wires 20. It is
a feature of the invention that the spacer could be installed equally as well on a
mesh or cage in which the horizontal wires are on the inside of the vertical wires.
Similarly, the pigtail portion 12 could be hooked over a vertical wire 22 and the
hook portion 16 engaged with a horizontal wire 20.
[0015] As may clearly be seen from Figs. 1 and 2, the spacer 10 embodying the invention
requires only one horizontal wire 20 and one vertical wire 22 for installation. Unlike
certain prior art spacers, no backing wire is required to impart gripping force to
the spacer. Similarly, there is no need for any specific spacing between adjacent
horizontal wires 20. Thus, the spacer of the invention is adapted for use with all
mesh spacings and with all wire gauges. No inventory of specially sized spacers is
required for different mesh spacings or gauges. Of particular advantage is that the
spacer of the invention is also useful with helical cages in which the circumferential
wires and the vertical wires do not intersect at right angles and in which the spacing
or pitch of the circumferential wires frequently is varied to meet reinforcing design
specifications.
[0016] The manner of installation of the spacer 10 is illustrated in Figs. 3, 4, and 5,
from which further advantages of the invention will be apparent. As a feature of the
invention, to install the spacer 10 the worker need only grip it at one point, namely
the nose portion 24. By gripping the nose portion 24 between the thumb and forefinger
with the shank portion 14 upright, the pigtail portion 12 may readily be slipped over
a horizontal or circumferential wire 20, as shown in Fig. 3. The particular configuration
of the pigtail portion, as described in more detail hereinafter, facilitates such
placement of the spacer on the wire 20. The spacer 10 is then slid along the wire
20 until the pigtail portion 12 contacts the intersecting vertical cross wire 22,
as indicated by the arrow in Fig. 4. Then, and without any need to change grip on
the spacer 10, the spacer may be brought into secure clamping engagement with the
wire mesh 18 by pushing the nose portion 24 in the direction of the arrow in Fig.
5 so as to move the hook portion 16 to the right (as seen in Fig. 5) and in behind
the vertical wire 22. Although not clearly shown in Figs. 3-5, the hook portion 16
defines a U-shaped channel 28 (see Fig. 8) which extends into the plane of Figs. 3-5
and opens back towards the shank portion 14.
[0017] As will be appreciated, therefore, the nose portion 24 not only functions to position
the wire reinforcement relative to the adjacent mold surface, but it also serves as
a convenient handle by which the spacer may be gripped for installation. This handle
function of the nose portion 24 has the very practical advantage of automatically
aligning the spacer in the correct orientation for installation, thereby eliminating
the time consuming fumbling and reorienting required with certain prior art devices.
The nose also provides a relative broad gripping surface against which the worker
can push when moving the hook portion 16 into engagement with the vertical wire 22
against the spring force of the spacer. This is to be contrasted with prior art spacers
where only a single round wire is provided as a gripping surface.
[0018] The pigtail portion 12 is preferably oriented relative to the shank portion so that,
when the portion 12 is engaged with the wire 20 and moved into contact with the wire
22, as shown in Figs. 3 and 4, the shank portion 14 will be included at an angle α
away from the vertical wire 22 (see Fig. 4). Then, when the nose portion 24 is pushed
to the right as shown in Fig. 5, the shank portion 14 will pivot generally about the
juncture between the shank portion 14 and the pigtail portion 12 and against the resilience
of the material composing the spacer. This creates a spring force urging the hook
portion 16 firmly against the vertical wire 22 and serves to secure the spacer on
the mesh 18.
[0019] A preferred embodiment of the reinforcement spacer of the invention is depicted in
more detail in Figs. 6-9. As shown in Figs. 6 and 7, the pigtail portion 12 preferably
is formed along an axis of curvature, or spiral, A-A that extends to the right side
of the shank 14 (as viewed in Fig. 6) at an angle of approximately ninety degrees
to the plane B-B of the shank portion 14. The pigtail portion 12 preferably has a
spiral-like main body 12a which lies in a front-to-back plane (C-C) and terminates
in an upright portion 12b extending along an axis D-D that preferably is approximately
perpendicular to plane C-C. It has been found that an inclination of the plane C-C
of the pigtail body 12a to the axis A-A of approximately thirty degrees (sixty degrees
relative to the axis B-B of shank position) affords a suitable inclination of the
shank 14 when the spacer 10 is installed on the mesh 18 in the manner of Fig. 4. The
perpendicular orientation of the upright terminal portion 12b relative to the body
12a allows the pigtail end to bypass the inside cross wire 22 and creates a stop for
positioning the spacer as shown in Fig. 4. When the mesh or cage 18 is reversed, the
upright end 12b butts against the then outside vertical wire 22 and creates a stop.
[0020] The pigtail body portion 12a, as viewed from the side in Fig. 7 and the top in Fig.
9, curls backwardly, away from the nose portion 24, and to the right and then returns
towards forwardly to approximately the axis B-B of the shank portion 14. For example,
the upper tip of the pigtail portion 12b might lie approximately on the axis B-B.
The curvature of the portion 12a should be sufficient to receive the reinforcing wire
20 when the spacer is looped over it in the manner illustrated in Figs. 3-5. The upright
pigtail portion 12b provides a bearing surface through which the force applied to
the nose portion 24 and shank portion 14 is transmitted to the wires 20 and 22 during
the final installation step (Fig. 5). This configuration of the pigtail portion 12
affords an easy and quick attachment of the upper part of the spacer 10 to a welded-wire
mesh or spiral cage at any one welded wire intersection.
[0021] It will be understood that the specific angles for the pigtail body 12a and the upright
terminal portion 12b given in connection with Figs. 6 and 7 are not limiting, but
may be varied from the values given. The object is to provide an inclination α of
the shank 14 relative to the vertical wire 22 when the spacer 10 is in the position
shown in Fig. 4 that will assure a sufficient resilient force to securely clamp the
spacer on the mesh when the shank 14 is pushed to the right and engaged with the vertical
wire 22 as shown in Fig. 5. At the same time, the inclination of shank 14 should not
be so great as to require an unduly large installation force or to overstress the
spacer material. For example, the aforementioned thirty degree inclination of the
pigtail body 12a and the ninety degree orientation of the pigtail terminal projection
12b produces an approximately twelve degree inclination of the shank portion 14 relative
to the vertical wire 22 when the spacer is attached in the position of Fig. 4 to a
4,1 mm (0.162 inch) diameter mesh wire. When attached to a 4,5 mm (0.177 inch) diameter
mesh wire, the angle of inclination of the shank portion 14 is approximately sixteen
degrees, and when attached to a 4,9 mm (0.194 inch) diameter wire the angle of inclination
of shank portion 14 is approximately twenty degrees. As the mesh wire size increases,
therefore, not only does the angular offset of the spacer shank portion 14 from the
vertical wire increase, but so also does the force required to move the shank portion
into engagement with the vertical wire. Consequently, the retention force holding
the spacer in place on the mesh also increases. This is an advantage because heavier
meshes are typically employed where larger loads are expected. The spacer 10 of the
invention thus inherently provides a greater retention force for heavy load applications.
[0022] As seen in Figs. 6-8, the hook portion 16 extends perpendicularly to the right (as
viewed in Fig. 6) from the lower, horizontal leg 24b of the nose portion 24 and lies
in the plane of the member 24b. The hook portion 16 preferably is U-shaped in plan
view (Fig. 8) and opens to the left (as viewed in Fig. 6). Thus when the spacer 14
is moved as illustrated in Fig. 5 to the right of the vertical wire 22, the open U-shaped
channel 28 of the hook portion 16 clamps over the wire 22 and securely locks the spacer
in place on the wire mesh. The spring force of the spacer which results from pivoting
the shank portion 14 about the juncture between the pigtail portion 12 and the shank
portion 14 urges the hook portion 16 firmly against the wire 22, and the U-shaped
configuration and leftward-facing orientation of the hook portion 16 serves to keep
the spacer from slipping off the wire 22.
[0023] As depicted in Fig. 9, the hook portion 16 and the pigtail portion 12 are preferably
in generally overlying relation, so that an axis parallel to the shank portion 14
and passing through the center of the U-shaped channel 28 of the hook portion also
passes through the curved region of the pigtail body 12a.
1. A spacer (10) for positioning in spaced relation to a surface (26) a reinforcement
mesh (18) having welded intersecting wires (20, 22), comprising a unitary member of
stiff but resilient spring steel wire material, said member having a central shank
portion (14) having axis of elongation (B-B) and a spacing projection (24) extending
outwardly from said axis of elongation in a plane containing said axis of elongation
for positioning engagement with said surface (26), a pigtail portion (12) at one end
of said shank portion (14) and extending to one side of said shank portion (14) along
an axis of curvature A-A for engagement, along said axis of curvature, with one wire
(20) of a pair of intersecting wires (20, 22) of the mesh (18), said axis of curvature
(A-A) of said pigtail portion (12) lying in a plane that is generally perpendicular
to the plane of said spacing projection and generally parallel to said axis of elongation
(B-B), and a hook portion (16) at the other end of said shank portion (14) for engagement
with the other wire (22) of said pair of intersecting mesh wires (20, 22), said pigtail
portion (12) being adapted to be engaged with said one mesh wire (20) along said axis
of curvature (A-A) and said shank portion (14) being adapted to be pivoted towards
said other mesh wire (22) against the resilience of said spring steel wire material
in order to bring said hook portion (16) into engagement with said other mesh wire
(22),
CHARACTERIZED BY:
said spacing projection (24)
being located adjacent said other end of said shank portion (14).
2. The spacer of claim 1 wherein said unitary member is composed of spring steel wire.
3. The spacer of claims 1 or 2 wherein said spacing projection (24) terminates in a rounded
portion for engagement with said surface (26).
4. The spacer of any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein said spacing projection (24) comprises
an outwardly deformed section of said shank portion (14) in which the member slopes
outwardly relative to the axis B-B of the shank portion (14) and in the direction
away from the pigtail portion (12) and is bent along a radius of curvature backwards
towards the axis (B-B) of the shank portion (14) and merges into said hook portion
(16).
5. The spacer of any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein said spacing projection (24) functions,
when said spacer is engaged with said mesh (18), to maintain the mesh in spaced relation
to said surface(26).
6. The spacer of claim 4 wherein said deformed section slopes at an angle of approximately
forty-five degrees to said axis (B-B) of the shank portion (14).
7. The spacer of any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein said pigtail portion (12) comprises
a curved body portion (12a) lying in a plane (C-C) that is inclined at an acute angle
to the axis (B-B)of the shank portion (14).
8. The spacer of claim 7 wherein said pigtail portion (12) terminates in an upright end
portion (12b) extending out of the plane of said curved body portion (12a) in the
direction away from said shank portion (14).
9. The spacer of claim 8 wherein said upright end portion (12b) extends at an angle of
approximately ninety degrees to the plane (C-C) of the curved body portion (12a).
10. The spacer of any one of claims 7 to 9 wherein the plane (C-C) of said pigtail body
portion (12) is inclined at an angle of approximately sixty degrees to the axis (B-B)
of the shank portion (14).
11. The spacer of any one of claims 1 to 10 wherein said hook portion (16) extends to
the same side of the shank portion (14) as said pigtail portion (12) and opens back
towards the axis (B-B) of the shank portion (14) for receipt of said other wire (22)
when the spacer is installed on the mesh (18).
12. The spacer of any one of claims 1 to 11 wherein said hook portion (16) is generally
U-shaped and lies in a plane substantially perpendicular to the axis (B-B) of the
shank portion (14).
13. The spacer of claim 11 or 12 wherein the pigtail portion (12) and the hook portion
(16) are in general overlying relation to one another along an axis parallel to said
axis (B-B) of the shank portion (14).
14. The spacer of any one of claims 1 to 13 wherein said spacing projection (24) is adapted
to function as a handgrip for facilitating installation of the spacer on the mesh
(18).
1. Abstandshalter (10) zum Positionieren einer Armierungsmatte (18) mit verschweißten
sich schneidenden Drähten (20, 22) in Abstand zu einer Oberfläche (26), umfassend
ein einheitliches Element aus steifem aber elastischem Federstahldrahtmaterial,
wobei das Element einen zentralen Schaftabschnitt (14) mit Längsachse (B-B) aufweist
und einen Beabstandungsvorsprung (24), der sich nach außen von der Längsachse weg
in einer die Längsachse enthaltenden Ebene zum Positionierkontakt mit der Oberfläche
(26) weg erstreckt, einen Ringelschwanzabschnitt (12) an einem Ende des Schaftabschnitts
(14), der sich entlang einer Krümmungsachse (A-A) nach einer Seite des Schaftabschnitts
(14) erstreckt, um entlang der Krümmungsachse mit einem Draht (20) eines Paars von
sich schneidenden Drähten (20, 22) der Matte (18) in Eingriff zu treten, wobei die
Krümmungsachse (A-A) des Ringelschwanzabschnitts (12) in einer Ebene liegt,
welche im allgemeinen orthogonal zu der Ebene des Beabstandungsvorsprungs und im allgemeinen
parallel zu der Längsachse (B-B) ist, und einen Hakenabschnitt (16) an dem anderen
Ende des Schaftabschnitts (14) zum Eingriff mit dem anderen Draht (22) des Paars sich
schneidender Mattendrähte (20, 22), wobei der Ringelschwanzabschnitt (12) geeignet
ist, mit dem einen Mattendraht (20) entlang der Krümmungsachse (A-A) in Eingriff zu
treten, und wobei ferner der Schaftabschnitt (14) geeignet ist, zu dem anderen Mattendraht
(22) gegen die Elastizität des Federstahldrahtmaterials verschwenkt zu werden, um
den Hakenabschnitt (16) in Eingriff mit dem anderen Mattendraht (22) zu bringen,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß sich der
Beabstandungsvorsprung (24) in der Nähe des anderen Endes des Schaftabschnitts (14)
befindet.
2. Abstandshalter nach Anspruch 1, bei dem das einheitliche Element aus Federstahldraht
gebildet ist.
3. Abstandshalter nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, bei dem der Beabstandungsvorsprung (24) zum
Kontakt mit der Oberfläche (26) in einen abgerundeten Abschnitt endet.
4. Abstandshalter nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 3, bei dem der Beabstandungsvorsprung
(24) einen nach außen verformten Bereich des Schaftabschnitts (14) umfaßt, in dem
das Element relativ zu der Achse (B-B) des Schaftabschnitts (14) nach schräg außen
und in der Richtung weg von dem Ringelschwanzabschnitt (12) abfällt und entlang eines
Krümmungsradius nach hinten in Richtung auf die Achse (B-B) des Schaftabschnitts (14)
zu gebogen ist und in den Hakenabschnitt (16) mündet.
5. Abstandshalter nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 4, bei dem der Beabstandungsvorsprung
(24) bewirkt, daß die Matte in Abstand zu der Oberfläche (26) gehalten wird, wenn
der Abstandshalter mit der Matte (18) in Kontakt steht.
6. Abstandshalter nach Anspruch 4, bei dem der Verformte Bereich in einem Winkel von
annähernd fünfundvierzig Grad zu der Achse (B-B) des Schaftabschnitts (14) schräg
verläuft.
7. Abstandshalter nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 6, bei dem der Ringelschwanzabschnitt
(12) einen gekrümmten Körperabschnitt (12a) umfaßt, der in einer Ebene (C-C) liegt,
welche in einem spitzen Winkel zu der Achse (B-B) des Schaftabschnitts (14) geneigt
ist.
8. Abstandshalter nach Anspruch 7, bei dem der Ringelschwanzabschnitt (12) in einem aufrechten
Endabschnitt (12b) endet, der sich aus der Ebene des gekrümmten Körperabschnitts (12a)
heraus in die Richtung weg von dem Schaftabschnitt (14) erstreckt.
9. Abstandshalter nach Anspruch 8, bei dem sich der aufrechte Endabschnitt (12b) in einem
Winkel von annähernd neunzig Grad zu der Ebene (C-C) des gekrümmten Körperabschnitts
(12a) erstreckt.
10. Abstandshalter nach einem der Ansprüche 7 bis 9, bei dem die Ebene (C-C) des Ringelschwanzkörperabschnitts
(12) in einem Winkel von annähernd 60 Grad zu der Achse (B-B) des Schaftabschnitts
(14) geneigt ist.
11. Abstandshalter nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 10, bei dem sich der Hakenabschnitt
(16) auf die selbe Seite des Schaftabschnitts (14) erstreckt wie der Ringelschwanzabschnitt
(12) und sich nach hinten zur Achse (B-B) des Schaftabschnitts (14) öffnet, um den
anderen Draht (22) aufzunehmen, wenn der Abstandshalter auf der Matte (18) montiert
wird.
12. Abstandshalter nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 11, bei dem der Hakenabschnitt (16)
im allgemeinen U-förmig ist und in einer zu der Achse (B-B) des Schaftabschnitts (14)
im wesentlichen orthogonalen Ebene liegt.
13. Abstandshalter nach Anspruch 11 oder 12, bei dem der Ringelschwanzabschnitt (12) und
der Hakenabschnitt(16) eine im allgemeinen übereinanderliegende Beziehung zueinander
haben, entlang einer parallel zu der Achse (B-B) des Schaftabschnitts (14) verlaufenden
Achse.
14. Abstandshalter nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 13, bei dem der Beabstandungsvorsprung
(24) angeordnet ist, um als ein Handgriff zur Erleichterung der Montage des Abstandshalters
an der Matte (18) zu wirken.
1. Ecarteur (10) pour assurer le positionnement, de manière espacée par rapport à une
surface (26) d'un treillis d'armature (18) comportant des barres entrecroisées soudées
(20, 22) se composant d'un organe unitaire d'un matériau formant barre d'acier de
type ressort rigide, mais élastique, ledit organe présentant une partie formant tige
centrale (14) présentant un axe d'allongement (B-B) et une projection d'écartement
(24) s'étendant vers l'extérieur, à partir dudit axe d'allongement, dans un plan contenant
ledit axe d'allongement pour une mise en prise de positionnement avec ladite surface
(26), une partie en queue de cochon (12), à une extrémité de ladite partie formant
tige (14) et s'étendant vers un côté de ladite partie formant tige (14), le long d'un
axe de courbure A-A en vue de sa mise en prise, le long dudit axe de courbure, avec
une barre (20) d'une paire de barres entrecroisées (20, 22) du treillis (18), ledit
axe de courbure (A-A) de ladite partie en queue de cochon (12) se situant dans un
plan qui est généralement perpendiculaire au plan de ladite projection d'écartement
et, généralement, parallèle audit axe d'allongement (B-B) et une partie formant crochet
(16), au niveau de l'autre extrémité de ladite partie formant tige (14) en vue de
sa mise en prise avec l'autre barre (22) de ladite paire de barres d'armatures entrecroisées
(20, 22), ladite partie en queue de cochon (12) étant adaptée pour se mettre en prise
avec ladite barre d'armature (20) le long dudit axe de courbure (A-A) et ladite partie
formant tige (14) étant adaptée pour pivoter en direction de ladite autre barre (22)
en s'opposant à l'élasticité dudit matériau formant barre d'acier de type ressort,
afin d'amener ladite partie formant crochet (16) en prise avec ladite autre barre
d'armature (22),
CARACTERISE PAR:
ladite projection d'écartement (24)
adjacente à ladite autre extrémité de ladite partie formant tige (14).
2. Ecarteur selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que ledit organe unitaire se
compose d'une barre d'acier de type ressort.
3. Ecarteur selon les revendications 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce que ladite projection
d'écartement (24) se termine par une partie arrondie prévue pour se mettre en prise
avec ladite surface (26).
4. Ecarteur selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 3, caractérisé en ce que ladite
projection d'écartement (24) comprend une partie déformée vers l'extérieur de ladite
partie formant tige (14), dans laquelle l'organe s'incline vers l'extérieur par rapport
à l'axe B-B de la partie formant tige (14) et dans le sens opposé à la partie en queue
de cochon (12) et est recourbée le long d'un rayon de courbure en direction de l'axe
(B-B) de la partie formant tige (14) et se fond dans ladite partie formant crochet
(16).
5. Ecarteur selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 4, caractérisé en ce que ladite
projection d'écartement (24) agit, lorsque ledit écarteur est en prise avec ledit
treillis d'armature (18), pour maintenir le treillis dans une position espacée par
rapport à ladite surface (26).
6. Ecarteur selon la revendication 4, caractérisé en ce que ladite section déformée est
inclinée de manière à former un angle d'environ quarante-cinq degrés par rapport audit
axe (B-B) de la partie formant tige (14).
7. Ecarteur selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 6, caractérisé en ce que ladite
partie en queue de cochon (12) comprend une partie formant corps (12a) incurvée, se
situant dans un plan (C-C) qui est incliné et forme un angle aigu par rapport à l'axe
(B-B) de la partie formant tige (14).
8. Ecarteur selon la revendication 7, caractérisé en ce que ladite partie en queue de
cochon (12) se termine par une partie d'extrémité verticale (12b) s'étendant hors
du plan de ladite partie formant corps (12a) incurvée, dans le sens opposé à ladite
partie formant tige (14).
9. Ecarteur selon la revendication 8, caractérisé en ce que ladite partie d'extrémité
verticale (12b) s'étend de manière à former un angle d'environ quatre-vingt-dix degrés,
par rapport au plan (C-C) de la partie formant corps (12a) incurvée.
10. Ecarteur selon l'une quelconque des revendications 7 à 9, caractérisé en ce que le
plan (C-C) de ladite partie formant corps en queue de cochon (12) est inclinée de
manière à former un angle d'environ soixante degrés, par rapport à l'axe (B-B) de
la partie formant tige (14).
11. Ecarteur selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 10, caractérisé en ce que ladite
partie formant crochet (16) s'étend en direction du même côté de la partie formant
tige (14) que ladite partie en queue de cochon (12) et s'ouvre en direction de l'axe
(B-B) de la partie formant tige (14), pour recevoir ladite autre barre (22) lorsque
l'écarteur est placé sur le treillis (18).
12. Ecarteur selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 11, caractérisé en ce que ladite
partie formant crochet (16) a généralement la forme d'un U et se situe dans un plan
sensiblement perpendiculaire à l'axe (B-B) de la partie formant tige (14).
13. Ecarteur selon la revendication 11 ou la revendication 12, caractérisé en ce que la
partie en queue de cochon (12) et la partie formant crochet (16) sont généralement
superposées le long d'un axe parallèle audit axe (B-B) de la partie formant tige (14).
14. Ecarteur selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 13, caractérisé en ce que ladite
projection d'écartement (24) est adaptée pour servir de poignée de préhension pour
faciliter l'installation de l'écarteur sur le treillis (18).

