BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] This invention relates to formation of a crack in a brittle object generally in a
desired direction whereby the brittle object can be fractured along the corresponding
desired line. The present invention also relates to a tool for forming a groove in
a brittle object and a method of fracturing the same in which a portion to be separated
by fracturing are defined by two free surfaces (facing a space) to reduce the resistance
to the fracturing force and to thereby promote fracturing.
[0002] Japanese Patent No.59-53992 and Japanese Patent Laid-Open No.62-220657 disclose
conventional methods of fracturing a brittle body such as rock, ground or concrete.
These methods are as illustrated in Figs. 2A to 4A and Figs. 2B to 4. A conventional
method is known in which a bore b is previously formed in a brittle object a and is
charged with a slurry of an expansive material, and the brittle object is broken by
the expansion pressure during the hydration process. Another type of method in which
an explosive such as dynamite is packed in the bore b and is ignited to break the
brittle object a has already been developed. In these methods, however, the bore b
has a circular cross section and the break the brittle object cannot be fractured
with a directionality selected in accordance with the design based on the kind, shape
and restrained state of the brittle object. In particular, in a case where an expansive
material is used, the time to fracture the object is increased unless the distance
between bores for forming a crack is reduced. Each of these methods is based on the
mechanism of creating the internal pressure of the fracturing agent to forcibly press
the brittle body outwardly. Therefore, if the brittle object is very large and has
a large area, its large and wide mass acts as a resistance to the fracturing force
and impedes the promotion of fracturing, resulting in a difficulty in fracturing the
object.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0003] In view of these problems, an object of the present invention is to provide a tool
for forming a crack in a brittle object in a desired direction and a method of fracturing
this material along the corresponding desired direction.
[0004] To achieve this object, the present invention provides a tool for forming a groove
in a brittle object, capable of being detachably attached to a boring shaft of a boring
device such as a crawler drill, hand hammer or core drill, and having a wing blade
protrusively formed on its outer peripheral surface.
[0005] The present invention also provides a method of forming a groove in a brittle object,
including: forming a bore in a brittle object by that type of boring device; forming
a groove in the bore in a fracturing direction by a groove forming tool capable of
being detachably attached to the boring shaft of the boring device and having a wing
blade protrusively formed on its outer peripheral surface; and charging the bore with
a fracturing agent to fracture the brittle object with a directionality. The brittle
object may be divided into smaller sections to be fractured separately in such a manner
that a groove-like space is formed to define a portion of the brittle object to be
separated by fracturing so that two free surfaces are formed at the periphery of this
portion, thereby reducing the resistance to the fracturing force to promote fracturing.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0006] The attached drawings illustrate a tool for forming a groove in a brittle object
and a method of fracturing the brittle object in accordance with the present invention;
Fig. 1A is a perspective view of a groove forming tool;
Fig. 1B is a perspective view of another example of the groove forming tool;
Figs. 2 to 4 are perspective views of examples of comparison between examples of the
present invention and the conventional method; Figs. 2A to 4A illustrating bored states
of conventional examples; Figs. 2B to 4B illustrating cracks in the conventional examples;
Figs. 2C to 4C illustrating the bored states in accordance with the present invention;
Figs. 2D to 4D illustrating formation of cracks in the case of the present invention;
and
Figs. 5A and 5B are front views of formation of grooves defining free surfaces.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0007] A tool for forming a groove in a brittle object and a method of fracturing the brittle
object in accordance with the present invention will be described below with reference
to the accompanying drawings. A groove forming tool 1 in the form of a cylinder has
a hole 2 formed from its upper end to its inner portion. The groove forming tool 1
is detachably attached to a boring shaft 3 of boring device such as a crawler drill,
a hand hammer or a core drill by utilizing the hole 2. The tool 1 has a wing blade
4 protrusively formed on its outer peripheral surface. The wing blade 4 has an acute
tip and has a generally triangular cross section. The wing blade 4 projects in the
radial direction of the circular cross section of the tool 1. The tool 1 may have
only one wing blade 4 or may have two wing blades 4 as shown in Fig. 1A or four wing
blades 4 as shown in Fig. 1B. The number of wing blades 4 is not limited to these
numbers and may be selected as desired according to the use.
[Operation I]
[0008] Operation of the present invention will be described below. A bore 6 having a predetermined
depth is formed in a brittle object 5 by using the above-mentioned type of boring
device.
[0009] The groove forming tool 1 is attached to the boring shaft 3 of the same boring device
and is inserted into the bore 6 is an impact manner. Ordinarily, the boring shaft
3 of the above-mentioned crawler drill, hand hammer or core drill is designed to effect
an impact action (vertical motion) as well as a rotational action and is also designed
to effect both rotational and impact actions simultaneously or effect only one of
these actions selected by a change-over operation. To form the bore 6 in the brittle
object 5, the boring bit is attached to the boring shaft 3, and an impact action of
the boring shaft 3 (boring bit) is effected while rotating the same. After the bore
6b has been formed, the groove forming tool 1 is attached in place of the boring bit
and is inserted into the bore 6. At this time, the functions of the boring device
can be changed over to effect the impact action alone. As the groove forming tool
1 is thereby inserted without being rotated, the wing blade 4 of the groove forming
tool 1 cuts the inner surface of the bore 6, thereby forming a groove (slit) 7 in
the inner surface of the bore. The groove forming tool 1 is inserted while the direction
in which the wing blade 4 extends being adjusted to the direction of a crack 8 which
is to be formed in the brittle object 5 so as to extend from the bore 6. After the
formation of the groove has been completed, an expansive material or an explosive
is packed inside the bore 6, thereby forming the crack 8 in the brittle object in
a direction corresponding to the direction of the groove 7. That is, in a case where
an expansive material is used, the expansive material expands with elapse of time
and causes an expansion pressure inside the bore 6 so that a stress is concentrated
at the groove 7, thereby breaking the brittle object 5. In a case where an explosive
is used, the explosive is ignited to break the brittle object 5 from a portion in
the vicinity of the groove 7. The expansive material applicable to this expanding
operation may be selected from well-known expansive breaking agents, e.g., lime-,
calcium sulfoaluminate-, half-baked dolomite-, magnesia-, ordinary Portland cement-blast
furnace slag-bauxite-lime-, alumina cement-lime-gypsum-, and calcium aluminate-lime-gypsum-
cement expanding agents, including "Bristar" (commercial name of a product of Onoda
Cement Co., Ltd.). The explosive may be well-known dynamite, black powder or the like.
A concrete breaker constituted by a capsule in which a chemical having a burning speed
lower than that of dynamite is packed can also be used.
[Operation II]
[0010] Operation of the present invention described below generally relates to the content
of the attached claim 5. As shown in Figs. 5A and 5B a groove-like space 9 is formed
at a position where the area of a portion of the brittle object to be displaced by
fracturing is defined. The shape of the groove-like space 9 is not specifically limited.
For example, it may has a straight-line shape such as that shown in Fig. 5A or it
may be curved as shown in Fig. 5B. Forming the groove-like space 9 with such a curved
shape is particularly effective for tunnel construction excavation. The formation
of the groove-like space 9 can be considered as formation of a free surface as described
below. If the brittle object is large in size and has a large area, its large and
wide mass acts as a resistance to the fracturing force and impede the promotion of
fracturing, thereby making it difficult to fracture the material. To cope with this
problem, the groove-like space is formed to provide a freely movable and unrestrained
surface, thereby dividing the fracturing area into small unit sections. With respect
to fracturing of each section, the distance between a bore 6 for fracturing this section
and the groove-like space 9, i.e., the distance between the bore and the free surface
is small, and the fracturing effect is therefore sufficient even if the fracturing
force of an expansive material or an explosive packed as the breaking agent in the
bore 6 is not so large. The groove-like space 9 may be formed by any means. However,
it may be formed by the same means as the means for forming the bore and the groove
7. That is, a boring device such as a crawler drill is used to form in the brittle
object 5 bores 6′ having a suitable depth. Thereafter, the groove forming tool 1 is
attached to the boring shaft 3 of the same boring device and is inserted into each
bore 6′ in an impact manner. More specifically, a boring bit is attached to the boring
shaft 3 of the boring device and an impact operation of the boring bit is repeated
while the boring shaft 3 is being rotated, thereby forming bores 6′. Thereafter, the
groove forming tool 1 is attached in place of the boring bit and is inserted into
each bore 6′. At this time, the functions of the boring device are changed over to
effect impact action alone, and the groove forming tool 1 is thereby inserted into
each bore 6′ without being rotated, so that the wing blade 4 of the groove forming
tool 1 cuts the inner surface of the bore 6′, thereby forming a groove 7′ in the inner
surface of each bore 6′. The grooves 7′ are formed in such a manner that adjacent
pairs of grooves 7 communicate with each other. To do so, the length of the wing blade
4 in the radial direction is selected while the bores 6′ are disposed at small intervals.
After groove-like space 9 has been formed in this manner, the brittle object 5 sectioned
by the groove-like space 9 is fractured in the same manner as that described in Operation
I.
[Comparison Example I]
[0011] An example of comparison between the above-described conventional art and the present
invention will be described below with reference to Figs. 2A to 2D. Two concrete cubes
a and 5 each having 40 cm sides were prepared. As shown in Fig. 2A, a cylindrical
bore b having a diameter of 42 mm and a depth of 30 cm was formed in the concrete
cube a at the center thereof. As shown in Fig. 2C, a bore 6 which was the same as
the bore b was formed in the concrete cube 5, and grooves 7 were formed in the fracturing
direction by a groove forming tool 1 in accordance with the present invention (having
an outside diameter of 40 mm, and having two wing blades 4 spaced apart from each
other by 180° and each having a width of 10 mm at its root portion, a width of 2 mm
at its tip, a height of 10 mm and a length of 30 mm). These bores were charged with
equal amounts of the same slurry of a lime expansive fracturing agent (the above-mentioned
Bristar) kneaded with 30 % water. In the example of the conventional art, as shown
in Fig. 2B, three cracks 3 were formed at angles of about 120° from each other 12
hours after charging. In the case of the present invention, as shown in Fig. 2D, a
generally straight crack 8 extending in the direction of the grooves was formed 8
hours after charging, and the cube was divided into two parts.
[Comparison Example II]
[0012] Another example of comparison between the above-described conventional art and the
present invention will be described below with reference to Figs. 3A to 3D. Two concrete
cubes a and 5 each having 60 cm sides were prepared. As shown in Fig. 3A, a cylindrical
bore b having a diameter of 42 mm and a depth of 50 cm was formed in the concrete
cube a at the center thereof. As shown in Fig. 3C, a bore 6 which was the same as
the bore b was formed in the concrete cube 5, and grooves 7 were formed in the fracturing
direction by a groove forming tool 1 in accordance with the present invention (having
an outside diameter of 40 mm, and having four wing blades 4 spaced from each other
by 90° and each having a width of 15 mm at its root portion, a width of 3 mm at its
tip, a height of 20 mm and a length of 50 mm). These bores were charged with equal
amounts of the same slurry of the above-mentioned Bristar kneaded with 30 % water.
In the example of the conventional art, as shown in Fig. 3B, three cracks 3 were also
formed at angles of about 120° from each other 14 hours after charging. In the case
of the present invention, as shown in Fig. 3D, formation of cracks 8 started 10 hours
after charging, and the cube was divided into four parts 1 hour after the start of
the formation.
[Comparison Example III]
[0013] Still another example of comparison between the above-described conventional art
and the present invention will be described below with reference to Figs. 4A to 4D.
Two concrete cubes a and 5 each having 40 cm sides were prepared. As shown in Fig.
4A, a cylindrical bore b having a diameter of 42 mm and a depth of 30 cm was formed
in the concrete cube a at the center thereof. As shown in Fig. 4C, a bore 6 which
was the same as the bore b was formed in the concrete cube 5, and grooves 7 were formed
in the fracturing direction by a groove forming tool 1 in accordance with the present
invention (having an outside diameter of 40 mm, and having two wing blades 4 spaced
from each other by 180° and each having a width of 8 mm at its root portion, a width
of 1 mm at its tip, a height of 10 mm and a length of 30 mm). A concrete breaker was
inserted in each bore, was enclosed by tamping with sand and was thereafter ignited.
In the example of the conventional art, as shown in Fig. 4B, the cube was divided
into five parts. In the case of the present invention, as shown in Fig. 4D, the cube
was divided into two parts on opposite sides of the grooves 7.
[0014] As described above, the tool for forming a groove in a brittle object in accordance
with the present invention is capable of being detachably attached to a boring shaft
of a boring device such as a crawler drill, hand hammer or core drill and has a wing
blade protrusively formed on its outer peripheral surface. It is possible to readily
form a suitable groove by using the wing blade. In the method of forming a groove
in a brittle object in accordance with the present invention, a bore is formed in
a brittle object by that type of boring device, a groove is formed in the bore in
a fracturing direction by a groove forming tool capable of being detachably attached
to the boring shaft of the boring device and having a wing blade protrusively formed
on its outer peripheral surface, and a fracturing agent is packed in the bore to fracture
the brittle object, thereby enabling a crack to be formed in accordance with a predetermined
direction and enabling the object to be fractured along the corresponding designated
line. Moreover, a stress can be concentrated to a portion in the vicinity of the groove,
thereby reducing the time to fracture the object.
[0015] In addition, a groove-like space can be formed in the brittle object at the periphery
of a portion thereof to be separated by fracturing, thereby forming two free surfaces
whereby the resistance to the fracturing force can be reduced to promote fracturing.
The features disclosed in the foregoing description, in the claims and/or in the accompanying
drawings may, both, separately and in any combination thereof, be material for realising
the invention in diverse forms thereof.
1. A tool for forming a groove in a brittle object, capable of being detachably attached
to a boring shaft of a boring device such as a crawler drill, hand hammer or core
drill, said tool comprising a wing blade protrusively formed on its outer peripheral
surface.
2. A tool for forming a groove in a brittle object according to claim 1, wherein said
wing blade has a triangular cross section.
3. A method of forming a groove in a brittle object, comprising: forming a bore in
a brittle object by a boring device such as a crawler drill, hand hammer or core drill;
forming a groove in said bore in a fracturing direction by a groove forming tool capable
of being detachably attached to the boring shaft of said boring device and having
a wing blade protrusively formed on its outer peripheral surface; and charging said
bore with a fracturing agent to fracture the brittle object.
4. A method of forming a groove in a brittle object according to claim 3, wherein
said fracturing agent is an expansive material.
5. A method of forming a groove in a brittle object according to claim 3, wherein
said fracturing agent is an explosive such as dynamite.
6. A method of forming a groove in a brittle object, comprising: forming, by a boring
device such as a crawler drill, hand hammer or core drill, a bore in a portion of
brittle object defined by a continuous groove-like space formed in the brittle object;
forming a groove in said bore in a fracturing direction by a groove forming tool capable
of being detachably attached to the boring shaft of said boring device and having
a wing blade protrusively formed on its outer peripheral surface; and charging said
bore with a fracturing agent to fracture the brittle object.
7. A method of forming a groove in a brittle object according to claim 6, wherein
said fracturing agent is an explosive such as dynamite.
8. A method of forming a groove in a brittle object according to claim 6, wherein
said fracturing agent is an explosive such as dynamite.
9. A method of forming a groove in a brittle object according to claim 6, wherein,
to form said continuous groove-like space, bores are formed in the brittle object
at small intervals by a boring device such as a crawler drill, hand hammer or core
drill, and grooves are formed in said bores by a groove forming tool capable of being
detachably attached to the boring shaft of said boring device and having a wing blade
protrusively formed on its outer peripheral surface so that adjacent pairs of said
grooves communicate with each other.