Field of the Invention
[0001] This invention relates to improvements in the combustion of liquid hydrocarbons and
consequent reduction in N0
x emissions
Background of the Invention
[0002] Liquid hydrocarbons are widely used in open flame and internal combustion devices
such as oil fired burners and internal combustion engines. One of the common problems
associated with such combustion devices is the emission of N0
x. Many attempts have been made in the past to reduce N0
x emissions but these normally have resulted in reduction of combustion efficiency.
[0003] Oil fired furnaces and boiler arrangements are used world-wide in producing heat
and electricity. Normally, petroleum distillates such as fuel oils are used in such
oil fired burners. It is highly unusual to burn directly mined crude oil because of
the considerable increase in pollutants in the combustion of the products, particularly
soot emissions.
[0004] It has been appreciated for some time that additives may be included in organic materials
which are used in oil fired furnaces and the like. A particularly suitable additive
is ferrocene which is one of many of dicyclopentadienyl iron compounds. Examples of
these additive constituents are disclosed in United States patent 3,535,356. This
patent mentions that ferrocene and its derivatives are valuable additives in various
organic compositions particularly hydrocarbons comprising gasolines and other petroleum
products including lubricating oils, turbine oils, transformer oils, kerosines, diesel
fuels, jet fuels, fuel oils, greases, asphalts, waxes, insecticides and the like.
It is not mentioned, however, in this reference what, if any, effect ferrocene may
have on the combustion of these products. However, in United States patent 3,122,577
mention is made that ferrocene is suitable as an antiknock agent in gasoline compositions.
[0005] United States patent 3,341,211 discloses the use of ferrocene in liquid hydrocarbon
fuel oils. The purpose of the ferrocene is to improve the ignition and combustion
characteristics of the fuel. The use of such ferrocene in fuel oils as per the examples,
reduces the presence of carbon in the combustion gases, and decreases the amount of
deposits in the combustion apparatus.
[0006] None of these references, however, contemplate the use of ferrocene and its derivatives
in liquid hydrocarbons to achieve improvement in the combustion efficiency and reduction
in N0
x emissions.
Summary of the Invention
[0007] According to an aspect of the invention, a process for burning liquid hydrocarbons
in a furnace while maintaining acceptable levels of N0
x emissions, said liquid hydrocarbons having a Conradson carbon content greater than
1%, said process comprising:
i) burning the liquid hydrocarbon in the presence of additive composition in an amount
sufficient to improve measurably combustion efficiency in burning the liquid hydrocarbon.
The additive comprises:
a) a compound selected from the group consisting of ferrocene and its derivatives
represented by the formula:

wherein each of R and R′, independent of the other, is hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl,
aryl or heterocyclic, and
b) an organic carrier liquid in which said ferrocene is soluble;
ii) the step of burning the liquid hydrocarbon requires a level of excess air relative
to the quantity of the liquid hydrocarbon being burned, and
iii) adjusting downwardly the excess air to reduce N0x emissions in combustion products while maintaining combustion efficiency at an optimal
level due in the presence of the additive, where
1) said level of NOx emissions in said combustion products, and
2) said level of excess air
are less than that occurring for the same level of combustion efficiency in the absence
of said additive.
[0008] By use of the additive composition in this manner, significant reduction can be achieved
in the soot emissions as measured by carbon in the particulate ash as well as increasing
combustion efficiency. Surprisingly, it has been discovered that reduction in excess
air requirements can be achieved which in turn lowers N0
x emissions.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments
[0009] This invention is applicable in improving combustion of a variety of liquid hydrocarbons,
either in open flame or internal combustion. Examples of open flame include various
burner systems such as oil fired burners used in heating devices. There are of course,
many examples of various types of internal combustion devices which include the variety
of gasoline engines as well as jet engines. The liquid hydrocarbons as burned in either
open flame or internal combustion, may be selected from a variety of groups. The various
types of liquid hydrocarbons may be petroleum distillates designed for combustion
or may be waste material of hydrocarbon base. The invention is particularly suited
to burning hydrocarbons selected from the group consisting of gasolines and other
petroleum products including lubricating oils, turbine oils, transformer oils, kerosines,
jet fuels, fuel oils, greases and asphalts. Although the invention as applied in burning
these various types of liquid hydrocarbons is applicable in all instances, principles
of the invention will be demonstrated with respect to the field of burning crude oils,
heavy, medium and light oils and the like. By virtue of using the additive compound,
the excess air requirements can be adjusted downwardly to reduce NO
x emissions in burning those various liquid hydrocarbons.
[0010] It is appreciated that there are variety of oil fired burner arrangements which are
commonly used in heating stations and thermo-electric generating stations. With the
advantages of this invention, crude oils as they are mined may now be burned in these
common types of oil fired burner systems which include the multi-storey high boilers
used in generating heat and electricity.
[0011] The problem with existing systems burning crude oil is the increase in pollutants
in the emissions.
[0012] In accordance with this invention, the crude oil is treated in preparation for injection
through an oil fired burner. Such treatment may include any necessary dilution of
the crude oils with combustible solvents and/or heating of the crude oils to reduce
the viscosity. Normally there is a holding tank arrangement provided to store the
crude oil. The crude oil may or may not be treated in the holding tanks. Preferably,
the crude oil is removed from the holding tanks and placed in a temporary storage
tank where the smaller quantity can then be treated with suitable solvents if needed
and heated if desired. The treated crude oil is then delivered to the oil fired burner
by use of suitable pumps and piping arrangement.
[0013] In accordance with this invention, the additive composition is introduced to the
crude oil before combustion of the crude oil in the oil fired burner. The additive
composition is introduced normally to the crude oil, either in the temporary storage
tank where the crude oil is initially treated or injected into the piping which delivers
the crude oil to the oil fired burner. Optionally, an injection nozzle may be included
with the oil fired burner where the additive composition in an atomized form is sprayed
with the crude oil as the crude oil atomized in preparation for combustion. A sufficient
amount of the additive composition is included in the crude oil to improve measurably
combustion efficiency in burning the oil.
[0014] The additive composition comprises:
1) a compound selected from the group consisting of ferrocene and its derivatives
represented by the formula:

wherein each of R and R′, independent of each other, is hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl,
aryl or heterocyclic, and
2) an organic carrier liquid in which said ferrocene is soluble.
[0015] In respect of Formula I, the term alkyl refers to an alkyl group branched or straight
chain of 1 to 10 carbon atoms, such as methyl, ethyl, propyl, n-butyl, hexyl, or heptyl.
The term cycloalkyl refers to a lower cycloalkyl group of 3 to 7 atoms, such as cyclopentadyl
or cyclohexyl. The term aryl refers to an organic radical derived from an aromatic
compound by the removal of one hydrogen atom. Such compounds include phenyl and substituted
phenyl such as lower alkyl substituted phenyl. These compounds include tolyl, ethylphenyl,
triethylphenyl, halophenyl, such as chlorophenyl, or nitrophenyl. The term heterocyclic
refers to pyrrol, pyridyl, furfuryl and the like. The aryl or heterocyclic group generally
contains up to about 15 carbon atoms.
[0016] Dicyclopentadienyliron is commonly referred to as "ferrocene". Hence the compounds
of the above formula I are considered to be ferrocene and its derivatives. The preferred
compounds of Formula I include dicyclopentadienyliron, di(methylcyclo-pentadienyl)iron,
di(ethylcyclopentadienyl)iron, methylferrocene, ethylferrocene, n-butylferrocene,
dihexylferrocene, phenylferrocene, m-tolyferrocene, didecylferrocene, dicyclohexylferrocene
and dicyclopentylferrocene.
[0017] The organic carrier is of a type in which the selected dicyclopentadienyl iron compound
is soluble. Furthermore, the carrier liquid has a high flash point and is of a viscosity
at operating temperatures to enable injection when required through the injection
nozzles. Preferably, the flash point of the carrier liquid is in excess of 74°F and
has a boiling point in excess of 95°F. The viscosity of the carrier is normally 50
centipoises or less at 20°C and is preferably in the range of 0.3 to 3.0 centipoises
at 20°C. Suitable organic carrier liquids, i.e. solvents, are either of the aromatic
or hydrocarbon type. Aromatic solvents include xylenes, toluenes and Solvesol 100™
(of Imperial Oil) which is a mixture of benzene and naphthalenes having a flash point
in the range of 100°F. Suitable hydrocarbons include alcohols, such as hexanol, octanol.
Other hydrocarbons includes fuel oils, kerosene, petroleum spirits and the like. The
solvents of this nature have a functional flash point with low viscosity. the solvents
are stable and the selected additive is soluble. Of course, the selected solvent is
non-toxic when combusted.
[0018] It is to be appreciated that the additive composition may include a variety of commercial
dyes to provide a distinctive color for the composition and distinguish it from others
used about the oil-fired furnace operation. The containers for the additive composition
should be explosion safe and are suitably handled. The tank containing the additive
composition should also be suitably equipped to minimize the risk of explosion and
fire.
[0019] The amount of additive composition used will vary depending upon the type of crude
oil being burned. Generally, the amount of additive composition used will range from
0.1 ppm up to 100 ppm of iron in the composition based on the amount of crude oil
being delivered to the oil fired burner. The preferred range of additive composition
used is 1 ppm to 5 ppm of iron based on the amount of crude oil delivered to the burner.
According to this invention, crude oils having high asphaltene contents can now be
burned in oil fire burner arrangements which could not be accomplished in the past.
Crude oils containing higher concentrations of asphaltene usually range from about
2 percent up to 15 percent by weight of asphaltene. Asphaltenes are a class of material
having high molecular weight. As common to crude oils they are a hard solid of melting
point well above 150°C. For example, a member of the class graphamite has a melting
point of 315°C. Asphaltenes are soluble in petroleum naphtha in the range of 0 to
60 percent and 50 to 60 percent soluble in CS₂. Asphaltenes are readily precipitated
by N-heptane which enables analysis of crude oils for the concentration of asphaltene.
Although the structure of asphaltenes is not fully understood, it is believed to be
an aromatic sheet of 16 fused rings with various substituents. Normally, when crude
oils having higher contents of asphaltenes are burned, the asphaltenes do not readily
combust and hence greatly add to the overall carbon containing soot emissions when
the "dirty" crude oils are burned.
[0020] It has been found according to this invention, that soot emissions in burning the
dirty crudes can be significantly reduced particularly in the range of approximately
a 50 to 80 percent reduction compared to burning the same crude oil without the additive
composition. Also, by use of the additive composition the combustion efficiency is
appreciably increased which may be in the range of 0.5 percent increase or better
depending upon the type of crude oil and its make up. Another significant advantage
of this invention is the realization that in using the additive composition, the amount
of excess air required in the combustion can be reduced. This provides the unexpected
advantage that in using less excess air, a reduction in N0
x emissions can be achieved. This is very important from the stand point of environmental
concerns where crude oils now can be effectively burned in standard oil fired burner
systems.
[0021] Other side benefits realized in using the additive composition of this invention
is reduced fouling and corrosion of the oil burner system which maintains optimum
heat transfer. This feature also extends equipment life, reduces maintenance costs
and minimizes interruption of plant operations. Other efficiency gains include reduced
fan power for soot blower operation, the ability to employ effectively a lower quality
crude oil and recovery of a marketable ash having lower carbon content. The further
benefit in the use of the additive composition in the processes of this invention,
is that by reducing soot emissions, there is a corresponding reduction of smaller
particulates in the atmosphere. It is well understood that particles smaller than
15 microns may remain suspended in the atmosphere for longer periods and hence can
be inhaled. However, by the use of the additive of this invention, there is considerable
reduction in the smaller particles of soot in the emissions from the oil fired system.
[0022] To test the effectiveness of the additive compositions of this invention and the
process of burning crude oil, a pilot plant scale oil fired combustion furnace was
used with suitable hardware for testing emissions. Combustion performance was measured
by analyzing for the following emissions in the exhaust gases:
carbon dioxide (C0₂), carbon monoxide (C0), oxygen (0₂), nitrogen oxides (N0
x), sulfur dioxide (S0₂), and particulates (R0
x).
[0023] The following analytical techniques were employed to measure values of the above
in the exhaust gases. Non-dispersive infrared was used to measure C0 and C0₂ emissions.
Paramagnetism was use to measure oxygen concentration. Chemiluminescence was used
to measure the N0
x emissions. Pulsed fluorescence was used to measure the S0₂ emissions and the method
"Five" in the "Standards of Performance for new Stationary Sources", Federal Register
36, No. 247, 24876, December 23, 1971 was used to measure the particulate material
as well as to analyze the following characteristics of the particular material in
the emissions; namely:
particulate loading
carbon content
ash content
particle size distribution.
[0024] The analytical techniques are uncertain for the values analyzed within the following
ranges:
CO₂ ± 5%
CO ± 10%
O₂ ± 10%
NO
x ± 10%
SO₂ ± 10%
Particle Loading ± 10%
Particle Size ± 10%
Carbon Content ± 10%
[0025] The pilot plant scale furnace operated on the average of 500 KBtu per hour with an
excess air requirement of 26 percent. The furnace gas exit temperature was in the
range of 2075 to 2225°F. The combustion air was not preheated in these tests. Based
on prior experience it has been found that there is a fairly close relationship between
the pilot plant scale oil fired burner and utility scale oil fired burner in terms
of effects of additives on composition efficiency. In accordance with this invention,
to determine the effectiveness of the process in improving combustion efficiency and
achieving the other features and advantages thereof, a representative crude oil was
obtained for testing. The crude oil (identified as Italian Vega) had the following
characteristics as set out in Table I.
TABLE I
| Fuel Characteristics |
Heavy (Vega) Petroleum |
| Heating Value |
18,393 |
| Proximate Analysis (weight %, dry) |
|
| Volatile Matter |
-- |
| Fixed Carbon |
-- |
| Ash |
0.06 |
| Ultimate Analysis (weight%, dry) |
|
| Carbon |
80.72 |
| Hydrogen |
9.07 |
| Nitrogen |
0.35 |
| Sulfur |
2.30 |
| Oxygen |
7.50 |
| Ash |
0.06 |
| Asphaltene Content (weight %, dry) |
15.00 |
| Vanadium (ppm, weight) |
50.00 |
Example 1.
[0026] In view of the organic carrier liquid having the ability to affect the overall combustion
process, an exemplary carrier was first tested to determine such impact. According
to this example, the carrier liquid used was xylene. The additive composition consisted
of 5000 ppm by weight of ferrocene iron distributed in a xylene carrier based on the
amount of crude oil delivered for any amount of time. The composition was diluted
to provide the necessary appropriate iron concentrations in the crude oil before introduction
to the oil fired furnace. Xylene was therefore used with and without ferrocene to
provide the following test results summarized in Table II.
TABLE II
| RESULTS OF COMBUSTION TESTS ON VEGA PETROLEUM PRETREATED WITH ADDITIVE |
| |
Pretreated Vega Petroleum |
| Combustion Performance Characteristic |
Xylene (0 ppm iron) |
Additive (5 ppm iron) |
| Furnace Gas Exit Temperature (F) |
2120 |
2190 |
| 0₂ (%, volume) |
5.0 |
4.7 |
| C0₂ (%, volume) |
13.0 |
13.3 |
| C0 (ppm, volume) |
30 |
30 |
| N0x (ppm, volume) |
470 |
500 |
| S0₂ (ppm, volume) |
1400 |
1360 |
| Carbon in Particulate Ash (%, weight) |
17 |
2.61 |
| Average Ash Particle Size (microns) |
10 |
5 |
| Particulate Loading (pounds/million Btu) |
0.02 |
0.02 |
| Combustion Efficiency (%) |
99.43 |
99.86 |
[0027] The apparent effect of the additive composition at a 5 ppm iron level on the normal
performance characteristics of the base line Vega oil crude flame can be summarized
as follows:
1) Although acceptable levels of C0 in the exhaust gases remained unchanged, the carbon
in the particulate ash was reduced dramatically by as much as 85 percent.
2) The reduced carbon particulate levels translated into about a 0.43 percentage point
improvement in the already acceptably high (99 + percent) baseline combustion efficiency.
3) The ash loading remained essentially unchanged;
4) The average size of the particulates decreased dramatically by as much as 50 percent.
5) N0x emission remained relatively unchanged which is important from the stand point of
now realizing that excess air requirement may be reduced.
6) S0₂ emissions remained relatively unchanged.
[0028] To better summarize the results of a measurable effect, the following Table III provides
a listing of the above noted properties.
TABLE III
| EFFECT OF ADDITIVE ON VEGA OIL COMBUSTION |
| Test Parameter |
Change in Combustion Performance Upon use of Additive |
| Test Fuel |
Oil |
| Additive Iron Concentration (ppm) |
5 |
| C0 (ppm, volume) |
0 |
| N0x (ppm, volume) |
+30 |
| S0₂ (ppm, volume) |
-40 |
| Ash Loading (%) |
0 |
| Average Ash Particle Size (%) |
-50 |
| Fine Particle Ash (%) |
-- |
| Carbon in particle Ash (%) |
-85 |
| Combustion Efficiency (%, absolute) |
+0.43 |
[0029] As is appreciated, it should be noted that combustion efficiency as measured and
identified in the above tables relate to carbon combustion efficiency. Hence, combustion
efficiency may be loosely defined as the extent to which elemental carbon in the fuel
is oxidized to C0₂. Based on these test results, a difficult to burn out high asphaltene
low vanadium heavy crude oil was efficiently combusted to match typical utility conditions.
By increasing the combustion efficiency, the amount of thermal energy extracted from
the crude oil was also increased thereby reducing fuel costs. This is significant
from the stand point that crude oil costs are approximately half the cost of fuel
oil normally used in oil fired burners. By using the additive composition of this
invention, black smoke problems are virtually eliminated. Electrostatic precipitator
performance is improved and excess air requirements as already noted, are minimized.
In most situations, an operator of an oil fired burner system cannot reduce the excess
air level requirements of a boiler during heavy oil combustion because high level
of particulates result which is manifested in a black, smokey plume. By using the
additive composition of this invention, one can maintain high levels of combustion
efficiency and reduce levels of excess air. Tests have shown that reducing the excess
air level results in a reduction of N0
x emissions with very little change in the combustion efficiency. The additive allows
combustion to occur at low excess air levels and in turn lowers the thermal N0
x emissions. This invention improves burning of high asphaltene heavy oil while complying
with N0
x and other emission standards with the additional benefits of minimal corrosion, slagging,
fouling and improved overall plant efficiency.
[0030] Having demonstrated the principals of the invention with respect to the combustion
of crude oils, it is appreciated that the principles of the invention apply equally
to the combustion of various other types of liquid hydrocarbons of the above mentioned
group to reduce N0
x emissions. The additive is particularly suitable for use in the treatment of other
oils such as the heavy oils and medium oils having a Conradson carbon content greater
than 1%. It is appreciated, of course, that the above crude oil has a Conradson number
considerably greater than 1%.
[0031] The effectiveness of the fuel additive, according to this invention, has also been
tested in other types of oils, such as the oils having the following characteristics
outlined in Table IV.
TABLE IV
| TEST OIL CHARACTERISTICS |
| Fuel Characteristic |
Light Oil |
Heavy Oil |
| Heating value (Btu/pound, dry) |
18,200 |
17,300 |
| Viscosity (mm²/sec at 100 C) |
2.2 |
39 |
| Flash Point (C) |
54 |
65 |
| Ash (weight %, dry) |
< 0.001 |
0.008 |
| Sediments (weight %, dry) |
< 0.1 |
0.20 |
| Sulfur (weight %, dry) |
0.4 |
2.40 |
| Conradson Carbon (weight %, dry) |
0.03 |
18 |
| Vanadium (ppm, weight) |
< 1 |
100 |
[0032] The furnace used in testing the oils of Table IV is the same as the furnace used
in Example 1. The furnace is operated though at levels of 10% excess air and 26% excess
air. The furnace gas exit temperature was in the range of 2075° and 2275°F. There
was no preheating of the combustion air. The firing rate was at 500 KBtu/hour. The
duration of the test for the light oil was 12 hours, whereas the duration of the test
for the heavy oil was 6 hours. The results of combustion of the heavy oil and the
light oil of Table IV are set out in the following Tables V and VI.
TABLE V
| RESULTS OF COMBUSTION TESTS ON HEAVY OIL PRETREATED WITH 0.2 TO 5 PPM OF IRON IN FERROCENE
AT VARYING LEVELS OF EXCESS COMBUSTION AIR (10 - 26%) |
| |
Agent Pretreated Into Oil |
| |
Xylene or Ferrocene |
Ferrocene |
Ferrocene |
| |
(0 ppm Iron) |
(0.2 ppm Iron |
(1 ppm Iron) |
(5 ppm Iron) |
| |
@ Excess Air |
@ Excess Air |
@ Excess Air |
| |
10% |
26% |
10% |
26% |
10% |
26% |
| Furnace Exit Temperature (F) |
2200 |
2095 |
2260 |
2150 |
2270 |
2175 |
| 0₂ (%, volume) |
2.3 |
4.8 |
2.2 |
4.6 |
2.6 |
4.9 |
| CO₂ (%, volume) a |
16.6 |
16.8 |
16.8 |
16.8 |
16.9 |
16.9 |
| CO (ppm, volume) a |
40 |
30 |
30 |
25 |
37 |
26 |
| |
| NOx (ppm, volume) a |
275 |
315 |
280 |
355 |
300 |
400 |
| SO₂ (ppm, volume) a |
1600 |
1575 |
1550 |
1625 |
1625 |
1600 |
| Carbon in Particulate Ash (%, weight) |
16.5 |
7.3 |
0.68 |
0.73 |
0.40 |
0.43 |
| Particulate Loading (pounds/million Btu) |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
| Average Particulate Size (microns) |
10 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
| Combustion Efficiency (%) |
98.32 |
99.43 |
99.90 |
99.90 |
99.95 |
99.95 |
| a = As-measured concentrations have been corrected to a 0% excess oxygen, or "air-free"
basis. |
TABLE VI
| RESULTS OF COMBUSTION TESTS ON LIGHT OIL PRETREATED WITH 0.2 TO 5 PPM OF IRON IN FERROCENE
AT VARYING LEVELS OF EXCESS COMBUSTION AIR (10-26%) |
| |
Agent Treated Into Oil |
| |
Xylene (O ppm Iron) |
Ferrocene (0.2-5 ppm Iron) |
| |
Excess Air |
Excess Air |
| |
10% |
26% |
10% |
26% |
| Furnace Exit Temperature (F) |
2230 |
2200 |
2220 |
2250 |
| O₂ (%, volume) |
2.2 |
4.8 |
2.2 |
4.6 |
| CO₂ (%, volume) a |
16.8 |
16.6 |
16.6 |
16.8 |
| CO (ppm, volume) a |
40 |
35 |
40 |
35 |
| |
| NOx (ppm, volume) a |
100 |
110 |
105 |
115 |
| Carbon in Particulate Ash (%, weight) |
5.2 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
| Particulate Loading (pounds/million Btu) |
0.0006 |
0.0004 |
0.0004 |
0.0004 |
| Average Particulate Size (microns) |
< 1 |
< 1 |
< 1 |
< 1 |
| Combustion Efficiency (%) |
99.99+ |
99.99+ |
99.99+ |
99.99+ |
| a = As-measured concentrations have been corrected to a 0% oxygen basis. |
[0033] As shown in Table V, the heavy oil was tested at 0, 0.2, 1 and 5 ppm based on iron
in the additive. It was found that 0.2 ppm iron had no effect on the combustion efficiency
so that the values reported for 0 ppm and 0.2 ppm of the additive are the same. At
levels of 1 ppm of the additive, significant changes are noted with further difference
at the high level of 5 ppm of the additive. At 1 to 5 ppm of the additive, there was
90% to 97% reduction in particulate carbon with a corresponding increase in combustion
efficiency from 0.05 to 1.6 %. The average particulate size was reduced by 50%, whereas
N0
x emissions increased by only 5 to 85 ppm. It is noted, however, at the levels of 1
ppm and 5 ppm the desired combustion efficiency of greater than 99% can be attained
at the reduced excess air levels of 10% where the NO
x emissions are very close to the value of NO
x in additive-free oil burned in 10% excess air. Hence the increase in NO
x emissions at 26% excess air can be offset by burning the oil with the additive at
10% excess air without any significant reduction in combustion efficiency. The incremental
reduction in particulate carbon and the incremental increase in combustion efficiency
provided by the additive of this invention were greater at lower levels of Carbonex,
that is 1 ppm versus 5 ppm, and at lower levels of excess air, that is 10% versus
26%. The observed reduction in particulate size was independent of the additive content
above 1 ppm. The use of the additive of this invention had no apparent effect on the
CO or SO₂ emissions, or particulate loadings.
[0034] The combustion results reported in Table VI for the light oil shows the results achieved
within the accuracy of the tests to demonstrate very little difference between combustion
efficiencies at 0 ppm additive through to 5 ppm additive. However, the additive did
affect other parameters. The additive of this invention in light oil had impact on
the normal combustion of other performance characteristics of the light oil. Treatment
of the light oil with 0.2 ppm of the additive and firing at 10% excess air reduced
acceptable particulate carbon by 38% and reduced acceptable particulate loading by
33%. There was no significant effect on the CO, NO
x, particulate size or the already ultra high and acceptable combustion efficiency
of 99.99%.
[0035] It is apparent that the use of the additive of this invention has a superior effect
on the heavy oils and crude oils. These oils have a Conradson carbon content greater
than 1%. The additive of this invention does, however, have an effect on the burning
of the light oils. The additive of this invention at a concentration of less than
1 ppm enhances carbon burnout in an already efficiently burning light oil flame, whereas
in the heavy oils, the use of the additive at a concentration in the range of 1 to
5 ppm reduce the carbon in the particulate by 90%, thereby improving combustion efficiency
up to 1.6%. This is a significant increase in combustion efficiency which can result
in the saving of large sums of money in the operation of an electric or thermal generating
plant over the span of a year.
[0036] As with the crude oil, the use of the additive of this invention in the heavy oils
and the like, aside from providing a reduction of carbon in the particulates, also
provides the advantages in eliminating opacity in the smoke from the furnace, improving
performance of electrostatic precipitators and minimizing excess air requirements.
The reliability and economics of oil fired burner operation is improved as a result
of these secondary effects. By providing lower NO
x emissions at the desired combustion efficiency, the additive of this invention then
minimizes corrosion and fouling and improves overall plant efficiency.
[0037] Although preferred embodiments of the invention have described herein in detail,
it will be understood by those skilled in the art that variations may be made thereto
without departing form the spirit of the invention or the scope of the appended claims.
1. A process for burning liquid hydrocarbons in a furnace while maintaining accpetable
levels of NO
x emissions, said liquid hudrocarbons having a Conradson carbon content >1%, said process
comprising:
i) burning said liquid hydrocarbon in the presence of an additive composition in an
amount sufficient to improve measurably combustion efficiency in burning said liquid
hydrocarbon;
said additive comprising;
a) a compound selected from the group consisting of ferrocene and its derivatives
represented by the formula:

wherein each of R and R′, independent of the other, is hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl,
aryl or heterocyclic, and
b) an organic carrier liquid in which said ferrocene is soluble,
ii) said step of burning said liquid hydrocarbon requiring a level of excess air relative
to the quantity of said liquid hydrocarbon being burned;
iii) adjusting downwardly said excess air to reduce N0x emissions in combustion products while maintaining combustion efficiency at an optimal
level in the presence of said additive where
1) said level of NOx emissions in said combustion products, and
2) said level of excess air
are less than that occurring for the same level of combustion efficiency in the absence
of said additive.
2. A process of claim 1 wherein said additive composition is added to said liquid
hydrocarbon prior to combustion.
3. A process of claim 1 wherein said liquid hydrocarbon is selected form the group
consisting of crude oils, heavy oils, lubricating oils, turbine oils, transformer
oils, kerosine, jet fuels, fuel oils, greases and asphalts.
4. A process of claim 1 for reducing N0
x emissions in the combustion of crude oils in an oil-fired burner of said furnace,
said crude oil having a high asphaltene content in the range of 2 to 20% by weight
of said crude oil to reduce soot emissions while simultaneously reducing excess air
requirements during such combustion, said process comprising:
i) treating said crude oil in preparation for injection through an oil-fired burner
including any necessary dilution with combustible solvents and heating to reduce viscosity.
ii) delivering said treated crude oil to said oil-fired burner,
iii) burning said crude oil in said oil-fired burner in the presence of said additive
composition in an amount sufficient to improve measurably combustion efficiency in
burning said crude oil.
5. A process of claim 1, 3 or 4 wherein said sufficient amount of said additive composition
comprises 0.1 ppm up to 100 ppm of iron in said composition based on the amount of
liquid hydrocarbon being delivered to said furnace and said selected liquid hydrocarbon
has a Conradson carbon content greater than 1%.
6. A process of claim 1 or 4 wherein said sufficient amount of said additive composition
comprises 1 ppm to 5 ppm of iron is said composition based on the amount of liquid
hydrocarbon being delivered to said furnace.
7. A process of claim 1 or 4 wherein said ferrocene compound is selected from the
group consisting of dicyclopentadienyliron, di(methylcyclopentadienly)iron, di(ethylcyclopentadienyl)iron,
methylferrocene, ethylferrocene, n-butylferrocene, dihexylferrocene, phenylferrocene,
m-tolyferrocene, didecylferrocene, dicyclohexylferrocene and dicyclopentylferrocene.
8. A process of claim 7 wherein said compound is dicyclopentadienyliron.
9. A process of claim 8 wherein said organic carrier is selected form the group consisting
of high flash point aromatic solvents, hydrocarbon solvents and petroleum based solvents.