[0001] This invention relates to an improvement in brushes, an improvement in synthetic
bristles used in brushes, and methodology for producing such improved synthetic bristles.
[0002] It is useful to first discuss the improvements in synthetic bristles. In mankind's
long history of utilizing natural materials, considerable application has been made
of relatively coarse hairs, filaments and fibres of animal and vegetable origin. "Bristle"
is a common term for these materials, although the term is often restricted to mean
animal hair, and even more specifically, sometimes to the hair of the swine. In the
context of this disclosure, we use the term bristle in its broadest sense to cover
all naturally derived filamentatious material which can be used to make the flexible
brushing portion of a brush. We further define a brush as a device, composed of a
multiplicity of bristles in which the base material in at least a portion of the bristles
is a synthesized polymer,co-polymer, alloy, or mixtures, e.g., nylon, polyester, polyolefin,
Amalon, Esterlon. As will be recognized by those skilled in the art, Amalon is a mixture
of polyolefin and nylon, and Esterlon is a mixture of polyester and nylon.
[0003] Since the development of the first truly synthetic bristle (nylon) as an adaptation
of synthetic fibre technology after World War II, a number of other synthetic bristle
adaptations have been developed and commercially employed. These synthetics have displaced
natural bristles in some brush applications. However, natural bristles are still important
materials in the brush industry because the synthetics developed to date have not
been completely satisfactory substitutes. On the other hand, some of the synthetics
provide certain superior properties to the natural bristles for some applications
(e.g. improved water resistance and abrasion resistance).
[0004] One aim of this invention is to provide synthetic bristles which have not only the
aforementioned benefits of such synthetics, but also many of the attributes of natural
bristles never before available in synthetic versions.
[0005] A second aim of this invention is to provide a synthetic bristle superior to conventional
synthetics in terms of polymeric material utilization efficiency.
[0006] A third aim is to provide a synthetic bristle which is opaque, or nearly opaque,
to light without requiring pigmentation or by using significantly less pigmentation
than conventional synthetics.
[0007] Natural bristle materials, whether of vegetable or animal origin, result from organic
growth processes wherein elongated cellular formations build upon one another to form
essentially rod-like structures of sufficient resilience and integrity to serve the
functional needs required in brushes for painting, powdering, scrubbing, sweeping
and the like. It is the cellular wall formation that provides structural character
to these natural bristles along with the complex chemical makeup of the specific bristle.
Some natural bristles are essentially tapered in that one end (the butt end) of the
bristle is larger than the other (tip end). Still others are not tapered or have very
little of this tendency. Natural bristles are always irregular in shape along their
length, and have scale-like outer surfaces. Some of these are naturally split at the
end, forming tiny fingers which are useful in brush performance.
[0008] Synthetic bristles heretofore available have none of the cellular structures, shape
irregularities or scale-like surfaces. Rather, they have dense polymeric structure
and are highly uniform in shape, with smooth surfaces. Synthetic bristles are available
in tapered or untapered form, and in cross-sectional profiles of solid round, hollow
round, ribbed, S shaped and other shapes dependent on extrusion technology. All synthetics
to date require physical splitting of the ends (flagging) where this is deemed desirable
in brushes.
[0009] Our improved synthetic bristles are specifically designed with cellular structures,
irregular longitudinal and cross sectional shapes, and scale-like surfaces. They are
designed in both tapered and untapered form, and in all the extrusion shapes as other
synthetics.
[0010] The result of this improvement is to provide synthetic bristles which combine the
appearance and physical properties associated with natural bristles with chemical
and physical properties associated with the polymeric materials used in their composition.
[0011] Furthermore, these improved synthetic bristles, by virtue of their cellular structure,
are less dense than other synthetics made from the same polymers. For example, such
bristles may possess only 70 to 75% of the weight of, (though not limited to this
range) synthetics made in the same cross-sectional profile from the same base polymer.
This benefit provides more efficient utilization of the base polymer and desirably
lighter weight bristles. These improved synthetic bristles are more easily split or
flagged than synthetics of the same cross-sectional profile.
[0012] The invention is illustrated more or less diagrammatically in the accompanying Figures
wherein,
Figure 1 is a schematic view of a conventional mode of producing synthetic bristles;
Figure 2 is a schematic view of the new mode of producing synthetic bristles described
herein;
Figure 3 is a side view, with a portion sectioned, of a solid bristle of the present
invention;
Figure 4 is a right end view of the solid bristle of Figure 3;
Figure 5 is a side view, with a portion sectioned, of a hollow bristle of the present
invention; and
Figure 6 is a right end view of the hollow bristle of Figure 5.
[0013] To explain our improvements in brushes, it is important to provide some basic brush
design background. We have defined a brush as a device, composed of a multiplicity
of bristles attached to a handle and designed primarily for painting, powdering, scrubbing,
sweeping and the like. While any brush may perform all of these tasks outlined to
some degree, use experience and refinement have led to more specific brush designs
for each of these applications. For example, the shapes of the handles are generally
different and may be expressly designed for these different functions of painting,
powdering, sweeping and scrubbing, as well as refined within each function, especially
as related to the specific task. Hence, scrubbing brush handles usually take different
forms from painting brush handles, but tooth scrubbing brushes usually also are different
in design from floor scrubbing brushes, and brushes designed for sash painting normally
have different shaped handles from wall painting brushes. Bristles used in brushes
also are selected or designed for the particular application of the brush. In general,
we define bristles as being relatively coarse hairs, filaments and fibers which possess
sufficient resilience and integrity to provide the function required of a brush. Experience
has shown that of these functions, scrubbing requires the most resilient bristles
and painting the least resilient with artists brushes being the softest.. Sweeping
usually requires an intermediate resilience. Resilience is a function of the bristle's
cross-sectional area relative to its length as well as the flexural properties of
the bristle material substance.
[0014] It should also be recognized that different practical methods have evolved for attaching
the bristles to the handles for these different functional brushes. Staple setting
of bristle tufts is a commonly employed method for many designs of scrubbing and sweeping
brushes. Strip binding is another method which is widely used. Twisted wire techniques
are also used, especially when circular brushes are desired (such as bottle scrubbing
brushes). The primary method used to make painting brushes is called ferrule setting
wherein a bristle mixture is bound in a metal bond with an adhesive setting material.
The adhesive applied in liquid form penetrates within the interstices between the
bristles, and if the bristle's cross-section is so designed, within the bristle itself.
[0015] With this background, our improvements in brushes are more easily understood. One
such embodiment is improved paint brushes as explained below: Two paint brushes were
constructed, using a standard formulation in one case, and an experimental formulation
in the other. The difference was substitution in the experimental brush of 40% by
weight of my improved cellular synthetic bristle for a like amount of a commercial
synthetic bristle. Both synthetics were of tapered form; of polyester material; and
of the same physical size. The two brushes were determined to have the same flexural
stiffness when compared in a special device designed for that purpose.
[0016] Painting tests were then performed using a special machine which allowed both brushes
to be compared in painting performance simultaneously using the same painting surface
over a range of angles of address to the surface, and a range of displacements of
the brush to the surface. The paint out results were compared in both the wet and
dried states. It was clear to the three test observers that the experimental brush
produced superior paint out results over the complete range of testing using Glidden
Latex/Spred Satin paint.
[0017] This experimental brush was also tested against a commercial brush formulated of
natural animal bristle using Tru-Test Alkyd Semi-Gloss enamel (7174 color). The experimental
brush provided clearly superior painting results.
[0018] Still another test comparison was made to a commercial brush which contained approximately
50% natural bristle and 50% synthetic polyester bristle. This test also applied the
Tru-Test Alkyd Semi-Gloss enamel and again the experimental brush produced superior
painting results with the same number of painting strokes on the test machine.
[0019] Another test comparison was made to a commercial brush made from all polyester synthetic
bristles. This brush was considered an outstanding performing brush. When both brushes
simultaneously applied Dutch Boy Latex 73-11 Semi-Gloss paint, the experimental brush
was so superior that only three strokes were required to produce the quality of paint
film that the commercial brush produced in four brush strokes.
[0020] We postulate that the superior results observed are derived from the use of my improved
synthetic bristle because of its several unique properties previously described. Also,
because the improved bristle uses less resin material than offset bristles, the resulting
brushes are more economical to produce. Still another advantage is the superior holding
character in the ferrule setting process when compared to other synthetics. This is
a significant benefit since it reduces the probability of bristle shedding onto the
painting surface. We attribute this benefit to the scale-like surface on the bristle
which improves the attachment of the adhesive to the bristle.
[0021] We have previously described our improved synthetic bristles. The following disclosure
described the methodology we teach for producing these bristles. Synthetic bristles
are conventionally produced by first melting an appropriate resin, thermoplastic polymer,
co-polymer, alloy or mixture, in combination with certain additives to add opacity,
color, and to minimize thermal degradation. Such materials are often pre-compounded
in major constituents such as pelletized special grade resins, and pelletized colorants
and additives. Standard practice is to melt the resin and additive mixture to a temperature
appropriate to the resin grade for hot melt extrusion through a group of small diameter
orifices in a head. A group of small diameter filaments emerge from the extrusion
head and are carried forward through take up rolls, water baths (or other liquids)
and controlled temperature zones, see Figure 1. One function of this take-up system
is to orient the essentially random molecular structure into an essentially axially
aligned structure within each filament. This process, which elongates the filaments
and reduces their diameters, is sometimes called drawing, and provides linear integrity
to the filaments. These filaments are later cut to length. When the filament to length
ratio is such that the resulting cut section has suitable resilience properties for
use in a brush as a substitue for natural bristle as previously described, it is
a synthetic bristle. By design of the orifices in the extrusion head, a variety of
bristle cross-sectional shapes are commercially produced. For example, X shapes, triangular,
round, and even hollow shapes are formed as taught by others. Special techniques have
also been devised to extrude the melt at different linear rates of speed so that thicker
and thinner sections are formed along the length of the filament. In this way sections
may be cut so that tapered synthetic bristles are produced having a thick end and
a thin end, and simulating in this respect naturally tapered bristle grown by hogs
or swine.
[0022] The invention comprises including, in the extrusion melt or process, certain other
additives, sometimes called foaming or blowing agents, including nucleating materials,
which are designed to create tiny gaseous bubbles at random within the extruding filaments.
It should be noted that the use of blowing agents in plastic parts manufactured by
extrusion, injection and compression moulding and other conventional plastic fabricating
processes is well known as disclosed for example in the articles "Extruding Thermoplastic
Foams", Modern Plastics Encyclopedia, Christopher Eaton, 1986 - 1987, pp. 243, 244
and "Foaming Agents", Modern Plastics Encyclopedia, Raymond Shute, Modern Plastics
Encyclopedia, 1986 - 1987, pp. 150-154. See Figure 2. As these filaments are drawn
in the next stage of the process, tiny elongated cells are formed within the filament
structure (see Figure 3). The bubbles or bubble craters occurring near the filament
surface(s) cause indentations and roughness at the filament surface which is scale-like
in character, and which can be controlled in the extrusion portion of the process.
Furthermore, the random occurrence and random size of the bubbles within the filaments
form a somewhat irregular shape as opposed to the true, uniform shape resulting from
conventional technology.
[0023] Although a preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described,
it will at once be apparent to those skilled in the art that modifications may be
made within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is our intention
that the invention not be confined to the foregoing exemplary description, but rather,
solely by the scope of the appended claims.
1. A synthetic bristle suitable for use in brushes,
said bristle being composed of a material selected from the group consisting essentially
of (a) polyester, (b) nylon, (c) polyolefin, and (d) other synthetic polymers, co-polymers
or alloys,
said bristle having a wall structure of cellular configuration,
said bristle having a non-uniform shape, and
said bristle further having a scale-like surface finish.
2. The synthetic bristle of Claim 1 further characterized in that the entire cross-sectional
area has a cellular configuration.
3. The synthetic bristle of Claim 1 further characterized in that
the scale-like surface finish is derived from craters formed when a foaming agent
ruptures the external surface, and peaks formed from the action of a foaming agent
which has not ruptured the surface.
4. A brush composed of a plurality of bristles.
at least a portion of the bristles being synthetic bristles as described in Claim
1.
5. The brush of Claim 4 further characterized in that
at least 40% of the bristles are the bristles described in Claim 1.
6. In a method of producing an extruded filament, the steps of melting synthetic materials
which are extrudable into a filament,
incorporating a foaming agent which is compatible with the above described synthetic
materials in said synthetic materials in an amount sufficient to generate a multiplicity
of cells within the synthetic material in a randomly dispersed manner, and
drawing the extruded filaments to a degree sufficient to cause the randomly dispersed
cells to be elongated in the direction of the axis of the filament.
7. A synthetic bristle suitable for use in brushes,
said bristle being composed of a material selected from the group consisting of (a)
a synthesized polymer, (b) a co-polymer, (c) an alloy, or mixture of synthetic polymers,
said bristle having a wall structure of cellular configuration,
said bristle having a non-uniform shape, and
said bristle further having a scale-like surface finish.
8. The synthetic bristle of claim 7 in which
firstly, the synthesized polymer is selected from the group consisting of nylon, polyester
and polyolefin, and
secondly, the alloy is selected from the group consisting of a mixture of polyolefin
and nylon, and a mixture of polyester and nylon.