[0001] This invention relates to nickel-cobalt base alloys and particularly nickel-cobalt
base alloys having excellent corrosion resistance combined with high strength and
ductility at higher service temperatures.
[0002] There has been a continuing demand in the metallurgical industry for alloy compositions
which have excellent corrosion resistance combined with high strength and ductility
at higher and higher service temperatures.
[0003] The Smith patent, U.S. No. 3,356,542, issued December 5, 1967, discloses cobalt-nickel
base alloys containing chromium and molybdenum. The alloys of the Smith patent are
corrosion resistant and can be work strengthened under certain temperature conditions
to have very high ultimate tensile and yield strength. These alloys can exist in one
of two crystalline phases, depending on temperature. They are also characterized by
a composition-dependent transition zone of temperatures in which transformation between
phases occur. At temperatures above the upper transus, the alloy is stable in the
face centered cubic (FCC) structure. At temperatures below the lower transus, the
alloy is stable in the hexagonal close-packed (HCP) form. By cold working metastable
face centered cubic material at a temperature below the lower limit of the transformation
zone, some of the alloy is transformed into the hexagonal close-packed phase which
is dispersed as platelets through the matrix of face centered cubic material. It is
this cold working and phase transformation which appears to be responsible for the
excellent ultimate tensile and yield strength of the alloy of the Smith patent. The
alloy is further strengthened by precipitation hardening. This alloy, however, has
stress rupture properties which make it not suitable for temperatures above about
800°F.
[0004] In my earlier U.S. Patent No. 3,767,385 I provide an alloy which is an improvement
on the Smith patent and which has stress rupture properties suitable for service temperatures
to about 1100°F. In the patent I disclosed my discovery that modifying the Smith composition
by including elements which I believe form compounds resulting in additional precipitation
hardening of the alloy, supplementing the hardening effect due to conversion of FCC
to HCP phase, made it possible to provide higher tensile strength and ductility with
a lower amount of cold work. This in turn raised the tensile strength and ductility
level at higher temperatures. However, above 1100°F neither the alloy of Smith nor
the alloy of my earlier patent wil provide the thermomechanical properties of the
present allow.
[0005] The alloy of the present invention provides an alloy which retains satisfactory tensile
and ductility levels and stress rupture properties at temperatures up to about 1300°F.
This is a striking improvement in thermomechanical properties and is accomplished
by modifying the composition so that the transus is raised to higher temperatures
and the precipitation hardening effect is maximized. Thus, the iron and aluminum are
reduced to incidental proportions, and titanium or columbium or both are increased
to limits described below. Accordingly, as pointed out in my earlier patent, not all
alloys whose composition falls within the ranges set out herein are encompassed by
the present invention, since many of such compositions would include alloys containing
embrittling phases.
[0006] The formation of these embrittling phases in the transition elements bears a close
relationship to the electron vacancies in their sub bands as was predicted by Linus
Pauling many years ago ("The Nature of Interatomic Forces in Metals", Physical Review,
vol. 54, December 1, 1938). Paul Beck and his coworkers (S. P. Rideout and P. A. Beck,
NASA TN 2638) showed how the formation of pure sigma phase in ternary alloys could
be related to the atomic percentages of their constituent elements by a formula of
the type: N
v = 0.61 Ni + 1.71 CO + 2.66 Fe + 4.66 Cr + 5.66 Mo where N
v is the average number of electron vacancies per 100 atoms of the alloy and the chemical
symbols refer to the atomic fraction of that element in the alloy. There is a critcal
N
v number above which 100% of sigma can be exerted to form. In engineering alloys however,
the presence of a small amount of the sigma phase can render an alloy brittle. The
first onset of sigma can be predicted at a lower N
v number which varies with different alloys. In my earlier patent 3,767,385 I describe
this variation with the percentage of iron in the alloy. However, in the present alloy,
a limit of only 1% iron is imposed and so only one critical N
v number is specified, namely 2.80.
[0007] The calculation of the number uses the above formula except that the chemical symbol
refers to the "effective atomic fraction" of the element in the alloy. This concept
takes into account the postulated conversion of a portion of the metal atoms present,
particularly nickel, into compounds of the type Ni3X, where X is titanium, columbium
or aluminum. These compounds precipitate out of solid solution thus altering the composition
of the remaining matrix to reduce the amount of nickel and effectively to increase
the amount of the other transition elements. Thus, the remaining composition has an
"effective atomic fraction" of these elements. Consequently many combinations of all
the interacting elements can produce the same N
v number (small effects on the N
v due to carbon and boron are not significant and may be ignored in these calculations).
Thus, the maximum of titanium when used without columbium and using the preferred
analysis is 6%. Similarly , the maximum for columbium without titanium is 10%. Either
titanium or columbium may be used in this alloy, alone or in combination, but must
be used so that the resulting N
v number does not exceed 2.80. The alloy of this invention, like those of Smith and
my earlier patent is a multiphase alloy forming an HCP-FCC platelet structure.
[0008] The alloys of the present invention broadly comprise the following chemical elements
in the indicated weight percentage ranges:
| Carbon |
0.05 max |
Cobalt |
20-40 |
| Molybdenum |
6-11 |
Chromium |
15-23 |
| Iron |
1.0 max |
Boron |
0.005-0.020 |
| Titanium |
0-6 |
Columbium |
0-10 |
| Nickel |
Bal. |
|
|
[0009] The preferred aim analysis for melting the alloy of the invention is, in weight percent:
| Carbon |
0.01 max |
Cobalt |
36 |
| Molybdenum |
7.5 |
Chromium |
19.5 |
| Iron |
1.0 max |
Boron |
0.01 |
| Titanium |
3.8 |
Columbium |
1.1 |
| Nickel |
Bal. |
|
|
[0010] The alloy of this invention is melted by any appropriate technique such as vacuum
induction melting and cast into ingots or formed into powder for subsequent formation
into articles by an appropriate known powder metals technique. After casting as ingots,
the alloy is preferably homogenized and then hot rolled into plates or other forms
suitable for subsequent working.
[0011] The alloy is preferably finally cold worked at ambient temperature to a reduction
of cross-section of at least 5% and up to about 40%, although higher levels of cold
work may be used but with some loss of thermomechanical properties. It may, however,
be cold worked at any temperature below the HCP-FCC transformation zone.
[0012] After cold working the alloys are preferably aged at a temperature between 800°F
and 1350°F for about 4 hours. Following aging the alloys may be air cooled.
[0013] The unique properties and advantages of the alloy of this invention can perhaps be
best understood by referring to the following examples:
EXAMPLE
[0014] An alloy composition according to this invention was prepared having the composition
by weight:
| C |
Co |
Mo |
Cr |
Fe |
B |
Ti |
Cb |
Ni |
| 0.006% |
36.3% |
7.35% |
19.4% |
1.04% |
0.008% |
3.79% |
1.20% |
BAL |
[0015] This alloy was hot rolled and divided into two portions, one of which was cold worked
to 36% and the other to 48%, aged at 1300°F and formed into test pieces identified
by the terms "specimens" which are plain, cylindrical test specimens and "studs" which
are threaded test specimens.
[0016] These specimens were subjected to mechanical testing at elevated temperatures as
set out in Tables I, II and III hereafter.
TABLE II
| Stud Tensile Strength Aged 1300°F - 4 hours 36% Cold Work |
| TEST TEMP. °F |
TEST STEEL |
AREA in² |
LOAD POUNDS |
STRESS psi |
|
|
| 70 |
5/16" studs |
.06397 |
16,220 |
253,556 |
|
|
| |
|
|
16,140 |
252,305 |
16,180 ± 57 |
252,930 ± 885 |
| 1100 |
|
|
13,720 |
214,476 |
|
|
| |
|
|
13,420 |
209,786 |
13,570 ± 212 |
212,131 ± 3316 |
| 1200 |
|
|
13,820 |
216,039 |
|
|
| |
|
|
13,640 |
213,225 |
13,730 ± 127 |
214,632 ± 1990 |
| 1350 |
|
|
12,840 |
200,719 |
|
|
| |
|
|
12,500 |
195,404 |
12,670 ± 240 |
198,062 ± 3758 |
| 70 |
3/8" studs |
.09506 |
25,025 |
263,255 |
|
|
| |
|
|
24,500 |
257,732 |
24,762 ± 371 |
260,494 ± 3905 |
| 1100 |
|
|
20,050 |
210,919 |
|
|
| |
|
|
19,550 |
205,659 |
19,800 ± 354 |
208,289 ± 3719 |
| 1200 |
|
|
20,150 |
211,971 |
|
|
| |
|
|
19,950 |
209,867 |
20,050 ± 141 |
210,919 ± 1488 |
| 1350 |
|
|
19,475 |
204,871 |
|
|
| |
|
|
19,540 |
204,608 |
19,462 ± 18 |
204,739 ± 186 |
TABLE III
| Specimen Tensile Properties Aged 1300°F - 4 hours 36% Cold Work |
| TEST TEMP. °F |
UTS |
.2% YS |
E |
RA. |
UTS |
.2% YS |
ELONG. |
RED. OF AREA |
| 70 |
253,507 |
242,485 |
14.0 |
42.6 |
|
|
|
|
| |
208,918 |
185,371 |
23.0 |
53.5 |
242,441 + 29,585 |
226,625 + 36,044 |
16.7 + 5.5 |
47.7 + 5.5 |
| |
264,898 |
252,020 |
13.0 |
46.9 |
|
|
|
|
| 1100 |
213,131 |
196,969 |
12.0 |
34.0 |
|
|
|
|
| |
196,692 |
179,860 |
17.0 |
37.1 |
204,912 + 11,623 |
188,414 + 12,098 |
14.5 + 3.5 |
35.6 + 2.2 |
| 1200 |
216,364 |
197,980 |
11.0 |
33.3 |
|
|
|
|
| |
208,417 |
189,379 |
15.0 |
42.0 |
212,390 + 5,619 |
193,679 + 6,082 |
13.0 + 2.8 |
37.7 + 6.2 |
| 1350 |
194,949 |
16,192 |
10.0 |
20.4 |
|
|
|
|
| |
194,589 |
172,345 |
11.0 |
23.0 |
194,769 + 255 |
170,768 + 2,230 |
10.5 + 0.7 |
21.7 + 1.8 |
[0017] A comparison of the properties of the alloys of the Smith patent, may earlier patent
and the present invention are set out hereafter on the attached table:
TABLE IV
| Treatment |
Smith 3,356,542 |
Slaney 3,767,385 |
Present Invention |
| % Cold Work |
51% |
48% |
36% |
| Age |
1050°F |
1225°F |
1300°F |
| Properties |
Room Temp. |
1200°F |
1300°F |
Room Temp. |
1200°F |
1300°F |
Room Temp. |
1200°F |
1300°F |
| Ultimate Tensile Strength (KSI)* |
310 |
Not suitable |
Not suitable |
275 |
222 |
Not suitable |
242.4 |
212.4 |
194.8 |
| 0.2 Yield Strength (KSI) |
290 |
Above |
Above |
265 |
210 |
Above |
226.6 |
193.7 |
170.8 |
| Elongation |
11 |
800°F |
800°F |
8 |
7 |
1100°F |
16.7 |
13.0 |
10.5 |
| Reduction in Area |
52 |
|
|
35 |
22 |
|
47.7 |
37.7 |
21.7 |
| Stress |
|
Not suitable |
|
Not suitable |
106.4 KSI @1300°F 101.9 hrs. |
| Rupture |
|
Above 800°F |
|
Above 1100°F |
96.0 KSI @1300°F 98.2 hrs. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
96.0 KSI @1300°F 79.1 hrs. |
| *KSI = kilopounds/in² = 1,000 psi |
[0018] From the foregoing data it can be seen that this invention provides unique thermomechanical
properties at temperatures in the neighborhood of 1300°F where presently available
alloys are no longer serviceable. This provides service temperatures for jet engine
fasteners and other parts for higher temperature service, thus making it possible
to construct such engines and other equipment for higher operating temperatures and
greater efficiency than heretofore possible.
[0019] In the foregoing specification I have set out certain preferred practices and embodiments
of this invention, however, it will be understood that this invention may otherwise
be embodied within the scope of the following claims.
1. A nickel-cobalt alloy having high strength and ductility at service temperatures
of about 1300°F consisting essentially of the following elements by weight percent:

and having a maximum electron vacancy number (N
v) of 2.80, said alloy having been cold worked at a temperature below the lower temperature
limit of the HCP-FCC phase transformation zone to a reduction in cross-section between
5% and 50%.
2. An alloy as claimed in claim 1 having been cold worked to a reduction in cross-section
between 10% and 40%.
3. An alloy as claimed in claim 1 or 2 having the composition by weight percent of:
4. An alloy as claimed in any of the preceding claims having been aged at a temperature
of about 800°F to 1350°F for about 4 hours after cold working.
5. An alloy as claimed in any of the preceding claims, which has been cold worked
at ambient temperature.
6. An alloy as claimed in any of the preceding claims having been aged at about 1350°F
for about 4 hours after cold working.
7. An alloy as claimed in any of the preceding claims having been cold worked to a
reduction in cross-section of about 36%.
8. An alloy as claimed in any of the preceding claims having been cold worked to a
reduction in cross-section of about 36%.