TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention relates to a projectile, for instance a shell or a robot missile,
fitted with at least one stand-off means, the projectile having at least one explosive
charge and a fuze for initiating the charge, the stand-off means including a rod with
an impact sensor for sensing the impact of the rod against a target, the impact sensor
and the fuze being operatively interconnected for signal transmission therebetween.
[0002] The invention relates more specifically, but not exclusively, to an explosive armour
shell or robot missile having two shaped explosive charges arranged in a tandem-relationship
and adapted for action against tanks which have protective structure for protection
against shaped explosive charge jets, so called reactive protective armour.
BACKGROUND PRIOR ART
[0003] The prior art concerning reactive armour was summarized in a lecture at the "Eight
International Symposium on Ballistics" on the 23rd to 25th October, 1984, in Orlando,
Florida, USA. The title of the lecture was "Interaction of Shaped-Charge Jets with
reactive Armor", and the lecture was published in a public available report from said
symposium.
[0004] Reactive armour of the kind mentioned has been put into practice, and has been fitted
to various tanks. In order to destroy reactive-armour tanks by means of shaped-charge
effects, the explosive armour shell must have two shaped charges arranged in a tandem-relationship.
The first shaped charge will penetrate the reactive armour structure, whereas the
second shaped charge will penetrate the main armour structure.
[0005] The prior art concerning explosive armour shells having two shaped charges is disclosed
in the patent specification of FR-7514091 and EP-0 193 427. Also the patent specification
of DE-3 010 917 shows some possible constructions for action against reactive armour.
[0006] The function of an interaction between a protective reactive armour fitted to a tank
and an attacking explosive armour shell having two shaped charges, below referred
to as the pre-penetrator and the main charge, respectively, is as follows:
- If the explosive armour shell will indicate the presence of a target, it will initiate
the pre-penetrator which forms a shaped-charge jet which penetrates and initiates
the explosive substance of the reactive armour.
- The reactive armour panel will expel its plates in a direction perpendicular to
the surface of the plates. Since the trajectory of the explosive armour shell will,
with a high grade of possibility, not coincide with the trajectory of the expelled
plate of the reactive panel, some edge of the plate will intersect the trajectory
of the shell.
- When the plates have been expelled a sufficient distance, i.e. when the plate edge
has intersected the trajectory of the shell, the main charge is to be initiated in
order to form a shaped-charge jet which penetrates the main armour structure of the
tank
[0007] From above it is evident that if the pre-penetrator will be initiated close to the
reactive armour plate, there is a great risque that the expelled plate will collide
with the main charge prior to the initiation thereof. In this case there will be a
misfunction of the main charge.
[0008] It is obvious that the chance of efficient function depends on the magnitude of all
parameters involved. For instance the size of the reactive panel, the velocity and
the angle of the expelling of the plates, the velocity of the missile as well as the
stand-off distance from the target at which the pre-penetrator is initiated, will
affect the function. Because the designer of the explosive armour shell cannot control
the first two parameters, he has to optimize the two latter parameters in order to
achieve maximum functional efficiency.
[0009] The stand-off distance from the target for initiation of the explosive armour shell
should be at least 0.5 to 1.5 m - taking into account presently known constructions
of reactive armour - in order to achieve great functional efficiency for a shell with
two shaped charges. It is with presently available technique difficult to arrange
an initiation device which indicates presence of a target at these distances. The
technical possibilities now available is to provide a rod at the front of the explosive
armour shell, or a proximity fuze. Presence of a target may be detected on the basis
of a signal transmitted from the proximity fuze, the signal being reflected against
the target, or measuring anomalies in the terrestrial magnetic field caused by the
target.
[0010] Proximity fuzes of aforementioned kind have drawbacks, they can for instance be disturbed
and rendered inefficient by the target, and the target may have various surface coverings
and camouflage. The magnetic signature have also a short range around the target.
Proximity fuzes are also expensive. For these reasons, the use of proximity fuzes
in explosive armour ammunition is restricted and not desirous.
[0011] The presently most common construction consists of rods in various arrangements,
for instance according to the patent specifications GB-957 956 or EP-0 227 622 and
0 236 553. The GB specification shows rods in an explosive armour shell having a single
shaped charge, but nethertheless illustrates the situation well. The rod is arranged
in such a manner that upon indication of a target the shaped charge will be initiated
and form a shaped-charge jet. This will pass the interior of the rod such that it
will first penetrate the reminiscences of the initiation device in the rod, and thereafter
penetrate the armour of the target. The shaped-charge jet will loose some of its energy
when passing the tip of the rod, said loss of energy thereby diminishing the energy
available for penetration of the armour of the target.
[0012] When using a rod in an explosive armour shell having two shaped charges, the tip
of the rod will cause a reduction in efficiency of the jet of the pre-penetrator,
which reduction will become a more serious drawback. The reason is that one wishes
to give the pre-penetrator greatest possible caliber and capacity in order to be able
to positively penetrate reactive armour. For weight and volume reasons and for the
reason that the pre-penetrator must not damage the main charge upon detonation, it
is desirable to make the pre-penetrator as little as possible. The pre-penetrator
should also be located as far away as possible from the main charge in order to avoid
damages caused by the pre-penetrator upon detonation.
[0013] The rod should have a length of 0.5 to 1 m as mentioned above, and should, for outer-ballistic
reasons, be as thin as possible. The rod will then, in the trajectory of the shell,
be elastical to such a great extent that the shaped-charge jet of the pre-penetrator
will penetrate the wall of the rod. Also in this case energy will be lost, which otherwise
would have been useful for penetration of the target.
[0014] It is very difficult to transport, handle and load an explosive armour shell having
a rod with a length of 0.5 to 1 m. Therefore, the rod must be designed in such a manner
that it will be unfolded or extended after the shell has been fired from the weapon.
This may be arranged by dividing the rod into a number of tube-shaped parts having
different diameters, the parts being inserted into each other. A spring may force
the rod into its full length.
[0015] The length of the rod in its quiescent state will, for practial reasons, be 0.1 to
0.3 m. When this folded rod is mounted at the tip of the explosive armour shell difficulties
will also arise in transporting, handling and loading the shell.
[0016] The German patent specification DE 31 37 198 shows a rod which in its idle position
is folded into an internal cavity in front of the explosive shaped charge. The rod
is in the shape of a helically wound steel spring tape. In order to extend the rod
it must first be rotated about 90 degrees and can then be extended by the spring force
inherent in the tape. This rod has a serious drawback in that it can only be extended
to a length corresponding to the dimension of about one calibre of the shell, i.e.
about 0.08-0. 15 m. This is quite insufficient for the projectile according to the
present invention, where rods of the size 0.5-1 m are required.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0017] The object of the present invention is to provide a projectile of the kind indicated
by way of introduction in which the above disadvantages have been eliminated. This
object will be achieved by providing the projectile in accordance with the invention
with the characterizing features set forth in claim 1.
[0018] The projectile according to the invention offers the following advantages:
- The rod may be made thinner, since no centre hole is required for the passage of
the shaped-charge jet from the pre-penetrator through the centre of the rod.
- Since the rod may be made thinner, there will be less outer-ballistic consequences
for a rod having like length.
- The initiation means in the tip of the rod or in the wall of the rod will not be
located in the way of the shaped-charge jet of the pre-penetrator.
- Since the rod, in its idle position, need not be located in the tip of the explosive
armour shell, but may be located by the side of the pre-penetrator, one will achieve
a shorter shell. This will be less bulky, and consequently easier to pack up, transport,
handle and load.
- The pre-penetrator may be located far away from the main charge, which offers more
energy for the shaped-charge jet of the pre-penetrator and less risque for damages
to the main charge.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0019]
Figure 1 is a longitudinal section of an explosive armour shell according to the invention
having two shaped charges and a stand-off means shown in its rest position.
Figure 2 shows, on an enlarged scale, the stand-off means and a front portion of the
shell according to Figure 1.
Figure 3 illustrates the shell according to Figure 1 with the stand-off means in an
operative position.
PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0020] Figure 1 shows a fin-stabilized explosive armour shell 1 with axiallly tandem-arranged
shaped charges, i.e. a main charge 2 and a pre-penetrator charge 3, below referred
to as the pre-penetrator. The pre-penetrator 3 is intended, in a way known per se,
to make a pre-penetration of a target, for instance penetrate a reactive armour that
is arranged in front of the target, thus facilitating for the main charge to thereafter
penetrate a main armour in the target.
[0021] The pre-penetrator 3 is supported together with an initiation means (fuze) 4 for
the pre-penetrator by a front shell casing element which forms a supporting means
in the form of a supporting sleeve 5, which rearwardly is transformed into a funnel-shaped
sleeve portion 6 for mating the caliber with a rear shell casing element 7 which has
a substantially larger caliber than the sleeve 5 and which houses the main charge
2.
[0022] The initiation means 4 contains an electric generator 4a which, upon acceleration
of the shell due to ejection of the shell from a barrel not shown, will generate an
electric current to an electrical capacitor 4b which is connected to an electrical
detonator 4c for ignition of the pre-penetrator 3.
[0023] Rigidly mounted to the funnel-shaped sleeve portion 6 is, for instance by means of
a screw-connection, a guiding tube 8, in which an elongated stand-off means is axially
movable, the stand-off means being in the form of a rod shaped, narrow element, for
instance a rod 9 of metal or a plastic. The guiding tube 8 is disposed excentrically
with respect to the longitudinal axis 10 of the projectile, i.e. it is inclined, as
seen in the firing direction 11 of the projectile, inwards towards the longitudinal
axis 10 of the projectile. Upon ejection of the rod 9 from the guiding tube 8, as
is shown in Figure 3, the tip of the rod 9 will thereby be located almost straight
in front of the projectile, however displaced a certain distance from the longitudinal
axis 10 of the projectile such that any sensor and initiation equipment arranged in
the tip of the rod will not disturb the shaped-charge jet of the pre-penetrator 3.
[0024] The rod 9 is ejectable to the operative position shown in Figure 3 by means of a
spring 12 disposed at the bottom of the guiding tube 8. The rod 9 is secured by means
of a ball lock 13 which consists of a locking sleeve 13a being movable axially against
the action of the spring 12, and a locking ball 13b, the rod in its ejected position
(Figure 3) being lockable by a spring tongue 14 fitted to the guiding tube 8. In the
tip of the rod there is a combined impact sensor and initiation means 15 which via
an electric cable 16 is operatively connected to the initiation means 4 for signal
transmission thereto. The rod 9 is, therefore, in the embodiment shown, hollow in
order to be able to house the cable 16.
[0025] The stand-off means 9 functions in the following manner.
[0026] When the explosive armour shell upon firing through a barrel, not shown, accelerates
through this, the sleeve 13a of the ball lock 13 will move rearwardly relative to
the shell, the ball 13b thereby releases the rod 9, which thereby will be forced forwards
relative to the shell under influence of the spring 12. When the rod 9 has been ejected
forwards to its terminal position, shown in Figure 3, the spring tongue 14 will lock
the rod in the ejected (expelled) position. The initiation means 4 of the pre-penetrator
has, during the acceleration within the barrel, been armed, and the generator 4a has
charged the capacitor 4b in a way known and therefore not described here.
[0027] When the tip of the rod 9 reaches the target, the sensor and initiation means 15
will be deformed, causing a current circuit to close, thereby initiating the initation
means 4 via the cable 16, such that its capacitor 4b will be discharged via the cable
16 to the detonator 4c of the initiation means 4. Thus, the pre-penetrator 3 will
be initiated and form a shaped-charge jet which penetrates the reactive armour of
the target, or its main armour if it has got no reactive armour.
[0028] Modifications of the invention are possible by providing the projectile with two
or more stand-off means of the above kind, if complete outer-ballistic balance is
required.
[0029] The rod may also be designed with such a length that it in its idle position extends
so far rearwardly that it extends by the side of the main charge. The invention is
neither limitied to an inclined rod, but this may alternatively be oriented in parallel
with the longitudinal axis of the projectile.
[0030] Although the shown shell is fin-stabilized it may be given a slight rotation, for
instance by means of a so called slipping girdle. The shell may alternatively be rotation-stabilized.
[0031] Also if the illustrated stand-off means is located at the outer side of the shell,
it is possible to at least partially house it in a nose cone, not shown, which extends
concentrically around the supporting sleeve 5 and the pre-penetrator 3.
1. A projectile fitted with at least one stand-off means, the projectile (1) having
at least one explosive charge (3) and a fuze (4) for initiating the charge, the stand-off
means (8, 9) includes a rod (9) with an impact sensor (15) for sensing the impact
of the rod against a target, the impact sensor and the fuze being operatively interconnected
for signal transmission therebetween, characterized in that the rod (9) is axially movable in a guiding tube (8) which is orientated
excentrically relative to the longitudinal axis (10) of the projectile, and that the
rod is forwardly-ejectable from said guiding tube to an ejected position (Figure 3)
where the rod is orientated excentrically relative to the longitudinal axis (10) of
the projectile (1).
2. Projectile according to claim 1,
characterized in that the guiding tube (8), as seen in the firing direction (11) of the projectile,
is inclined inwards towards the longitudinal axis (10) of the projectile.
3. Projectile according to claim 2,
characterized in that it is provided with a supporting means (5, 6) which supports the explosive
charge (3), the guiding tube (8) being mounted on the outer side of the supporting
means (6).
4. Projectile according to any preceding claim, characterized in that it is provided with a main explosive charge (2) disposed behind said explosive
charge (3), said first-mentioned explosive charge being designed to carry out a pre-penetration
in the target in order to facilitate the penetration of the main explosive charge
into the target.
5. Projectile according to claim 4,
characterized in that the two explosive charges (2, 3) are shaped explosive charges.