BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
[0001] The present invention relates to a container which is useful for shipping and storing
hazardous fluid materials.
Background Information
[0002] The shipment of hazardous fluid materials requires the use of a shipping container
or package which will protect the vessel holding the material from shock which can
cause breakage as well as provide for containment or control of the fluid material
should the vessel be broken. The shock protection and containment requirements are
generally incompatible in that materials which provide good shock protection typically
exhibit poor fluid containment or absorption properties and materials having good
fluid containment or absorption properties exhibit poor shock protection properties.
Hazardous fluid material shipping containers which offer both shock and containment
protection which have evolved are a combination of a more rigid container which provides
shock protection that is filled with an absorbent material. This combined structure
results in a shipping package that is very large relative to the volume of hazardous
material being shipped in the package.
[0003] U.S. Patent No. 4,560,069 (Simon) discloses a package assembly for transporting hazardous
materials including a bottle containing the hazardous material disposed within a metal
can wherein the bottle is surrounded on all sides by individual upper, lower and side
absorbent non-resilient and frangible synthetic foam elements. The foam elements provide
cushioning for the bottle and absorbency in the case of spillage. The individual foam
elements are maintained out of contact with each other by means of a fiberboard spacers.
The spacers are disposed to separate the upper and lower ends of the bottle from the
resin foam and to protect the frangible foam from disintegration due to abrasion by
the bottle. The metal can can be suspended within an outer corrugated fiberboard box
by means of a fiberboard insert element for the outer box. The fiberboard insert element
supports the can out of contact with the outer fiberboard box and provides a protecting
buffer zone between the can and the walls of the outer fiberboard box for protection
of the can.
[0004] U.S. Patent No. 3,999,653 (Haigh et al.) discloses a package containing a hazardous
liquid which comprises a container which is generally impermeable to a hazardous liquid
contained therein, the container being subject to discharge of its contents when subjected
to impact. The container is disposed within a first jacket of a liquid permeable material
of sufficient strength to contain fragments of the container on rupture thereof. A
second jacket is provided over the first jacket, the second jacket having at least
an inner wall and outer wall, the inner wall being liquid permeable, a hazardous liquid
swellable body contained between the inner wall and outer wall and being generally
co-extensive with the inner wall and outer wall, and a third jacket of hazardous liquid
vapor imperious membrane.
[0005] U.S. Patent No. 4,213,528 (Kreutz et al.) discloses a package for an acid container,
such as an acid containing ampule or bottle, formed of an acid resistant envelope
and a separate removable absorbent shield for enclosing the acid container, with the
absorbent shield including a material to neutralize acid whereby any acid released
from the container is absorbed and neutralized by the absorbent shield. The absorbent
shield is generally porous, yet sufficiently absorbent to allow essentially instantaneous
absorption of acidic liquids of high, medium and low viscosities.
[0006] U.S. Patent No. Re 24,767 (Simon et al.) discloses a packaging container that provides
uniform thermal, shock, impact, vibration, inertia and fluid impervious insulation
for a fragile or delicate object or material. The object or material is completely
encased in a yielding, flexible and resilient cellular or foamaceous sheath of selected
thickness that is effective as a protection against shock, impact, vibration, inertia
effects, etc. as well as being a good thermal insulating blanket, the sheath cradling
and supporting the object or material, and a fluid-tight or impervious shell to protect
the object or material against deterioration by temperature changes or moisture.
[0007] U.S. Patent No. 2,929,425 (Slaughter) discloses a protective pouch comprising an
elongated cushioning strip having a series of pockets into which parts to be packaged
may be inserted. The pouch is so constructed that one or more of the longitudinal
edges of the cushioning strip may be folded over the pockets to cover them, and then
the pouch is either rolled up or folded up for insertion into a shipping container
such as a metal can, a wooden box or a carton.
[0008] U.S. Patent No. 2,941,708 (Crane et al.) discloses a molded pulp set-up insulating
container in which six integrally joined sections have rims disposed thereon to give
locking contact where free section edges meet. The container is molded so as to have
the minimum amount of pulp in direct contact with the goods held in the container
to minimize heat transfer through the pulp. The container has sufficient rigidity
to support the goods within the container and to also entrap a blanket of insulating
air around the goods.
[0009] U.S. Patent No. 3,309,893 (Heffler et al.) discloses an insulated shipping container
which has an elongated body, quadrilateral in cross section, formed of a rigid, inflexible
polyurethane foam, having a heat-conductivity factor in the range of 0.11 to 0.20
and integrally provided with a cavity of circular cross section opening at one end
of the body and being closed at its other end and a closure for the cavity being of
cylindrical form and having a diameter greater than that of the cavity and formed
of resilient, flexible, and porous polyurethane foam for sealing engagement within
the open end of the cavity for forming a tight joint with the walls thereof while
permitting the escape of gases from within the container and having a heat conductivity
factor in the range of 0.22 to 0.35.
[0010] U.S. Patent No. 3,698,587 (Baker et al.) discloses a self-sealing wall for containers
and conduits comprising a substantially rigid supporting layer of liquid impervious
material, a layer of foam and at least one layer of a homogeneous elastomeric polyurethane
adhered to the foam.
[0011] U.S. Patent 3,895,159 (Yoshimura) discloses a cryogenic insulation material which
is shaped in conformance with the the form of an article to be insulated and is made
of a rigid polyurethane foam having a core layer including cells and inner and outer
surface layers including hardly any cells. Glass fiber is embedded at least in the
inner surface layer.
[0012] U.S. Patent No. 4,124,116 (McCabe, Jr.) discloses a liquid absorbing sectional pack
consisting of upper and lower filter sheets bonded to each other at the outermost
contiguous edges to form an enclosure. The enclosure is divided into a plurality of
sectional compartments which are isolated from each other by dissolving barrier sheets.
The dissolving barrier sheets consist essentially of a water soluble carboxy methyl
cellulose compound. Each of the sectional compartments contain a predetermined quantity
of absorbent granules. The barrier sheets function to dissolve when the granules have
absorbed a predetermined amount of moisture so as to provide for increased space in
which to contain moist granules.
[0013] U.S. Patent No. 4,240,547 (Taylor) discloses a compact, reusable specimen mailer
for safely shipping fragile specimen containers via the postal service. Two substantially
identical L-shaped matable parts are each provided with a long leg having a flat free
end and a flat inside face, and a short leg having a flat inside face, so that the
two parts may be joined together with the free end of the long legs of the two parts
flush against each other. Typically, the long leg of each part forms apertures for
receiving test tubes, which protrude from the free end of the long leg of the other
part. Also typically, the long leg forms an aperture opening out of its free end and
its inside face, and connected with another cavity formed in the inside face of the
short leg, for receiving a slide holder. A sheet of absorbent material is disposed
within a recess in the inside face of the long leg for absorbing leaking fluids. The
two parts are joined together and placed in a special envelope for mailing.
[0014] U.S. Patent 4,481,779 (Barthel) discloses a storage container for shipping transportable
materials at cryogenic temperatures including a vessel which opens to the atmosphere
and contains a micro-fibrous structure for holding a liquefied gas such as liquid
nitrogen in adsorption and capillary suspension. The micro-fibrous structure comprises
a core permeable to liquid and gaseous nitrogen and an adsorption matrix composed
of a web of inorganic fibers surrounding the core in a multi-layered arrangement.
[0015] U.S. Patent 0,495,775 (Young et al.) discloses a container for shipping transportable
materials at cryogenic temperatures including a vessel which opens to the atmosphere
and contains a micro-fibrous structure for holding a liquefied gas such as liquid
nitrogen in adsorption and capillary suspension. The micro-fibrous structure comprises
a core permeable to liquid and gaseous nitrogen and an adsorption matrix composed
of randomly oriented inorganic fibers surrounding the core as a homogeneous body in
stable confinement.
[0016] U.S. Patent No. 4,584,822 (Fielding et al.) discloses a cushion packing material
for use in protecting objects from shock and vibrational loads. The cushion packing
comprises a dimensionally stable thermoformed shell forming a chamber therein of a
predetermined configuration and having a foam material, preferably low density polyurethane
foam, disposed therewithin so as to provide a molded density of less than or equal
to 1.5 pounds per cubic foot.
Summary of the Invention
[0017] The present invention, in one aspect, provides an article comprising compressed particles
comprising polyolefin microfibers, said article having a solidity of at least 20%.
[0018] The present invention, in another aspect, provides a container comprising a shaped
article of compressed particles of polyolefin microfibers, said article having a solidity
of at least about 20%. The container is absorbent, impact resistant and thermally
insulating. Preferably, the container is enclosed in an impermeable protective outer
layer. Particulate and other fibrous material can also be incorporated in the compressed
particles of polyolefin microfiber structure. The container has excellent structural
rigidity, impact resistance, and compression resistance and provides both excellent
cushioning properties and excellent sorbency.
[0019] The container is particularly useful for storing and transporting hazardous liquid
materials such as acidic materials, caustic materials, and biological fluids, particularly
when such materials are packaged in breakable vessels. Generally, the preferred material
for containment of hazardous liquid materials are rigid breakable materials such as
glass or high density thermoplastic materials such as polyolefin, polycarbonate or
polyester in the form of jars, bottles, vials, or test tubes. In handling and shipping,
such vessels are susceptible to breakage through impact. Breakage of the vessel creates
the potential for contamination of the surrounding environment and the potential human
risk associated in contacting the contaminated broken vessel and its contents. The
excellent cushioning and sorbency properties of the containers of this invention provide
an excellent means for safely storing and shipping hazardous liquid materials in breakable
vessels.
[0020] The container of the present invention is also useful for storing and shipping materials
under cryogenic conditions.
[0021] The container of the present invention also can provide excellent thermal insulation
for vessels stored and shipped in the containers.
[0022] The present invention, in a further aspect, provides a process for preparing the
compressed particles of polyolefin microfiber article of the present invention comprising
providing particles of polyolefin microfibers to a mold, applying pressure to said
particles, releasing said pressure, and removing said article from said mold, said
pressure being sufficient to achieve a solidity of at least about 20% when said pressure
is released.
[0023] The present invention, in another aspect, provides a process for preparing a container
comprising providing particles of polyolefin microfibers to a mold, applying pressure
to said particles to form said container, releasing said pressure, and removing said
container from said mold, said pressure being sufficient to achieve a solidity of
at least about 20% when said pressure is released.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0024]
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a container of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of another container of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a further container of the present invention.
Detailed Description of the Invention
[0025] The polyolefin fibers useful in the present invention can be formed from polyethylene,
polypropylene, polybutylene, blends thereof and copolymers of ethylene, propylene
and/or butylene. The fibers are preferably less than about 50 microns, more preferably
less than about 25 microns, most preferably less than about 10 microns, in diameter.
The fibers are preferably prepared by melt blowing, flash spinning, or fibrillation.
Particularly preferred are blown microfibers in web form which has been milled or
divellicated to form the particles of polyolefin microfibers. The particles preferably
are less than about 2 cm, more preferably less than about 1 cm, most preferably less
than about 0.5 cm in average diameter, although a small amount, generally less than
about 5 weight percent can range in size up to about 10 cm.
[0026] The microfiber webs can be prepared, for example, as described in Wente, Van A.,
"Superfine Thermoplastic Fibers,"
Industrial Engineering Chemistry, vol. 48, pp. 1342-1346, and in Wente, Van A. et al., "Manufacture of Superfine Organic
Fibers," Report No. 4364 of the Naval Research Laboratories, published May 25, 1954,
or from microfiber webs containing particulate matter such as those disclosed, for
example, in U.S. Patent No. 3,971,373 (Braun), U.S. Patent No. 4,100,324 (Anderson
et al.) and U.S. Patent No. 4,429,001 (Kolpin et al.).
[0027] The microfiber webs are then formed into particles having a size of less than about
2 cm average diameter such as by, for example, milling or divellicating. Milling can
be carried out using a hammer mill, a cryogenic mill or a shredder. Divellicating
can be carried out using a lickerin as described in U.S. Patent No. 4,813,948 (Insley).
Such divellicating produces microwebs having a relatively dense nucleus with fibers
and fiber bundles extending therefrom. The nucleus of the microfiber microwebs is
preferably in the range of about 0.05 to 4 mm, more preferably about 0.2 to 2 mm.
The extending fibers and/or fiber bundles preferably extend beyond the nucleus to
provide an overall diameter of about 0.07 to 10 mm, more preferably about 0.1 to 5
mm.
[0028] The articles and containers of the invention are formed by compressing the particles
of polyolefin microfibers, i.e., the microfiber microwebs to a solidity of at least
about 20%, preferably at least about 30%. The solidity of the article or container
is calculated according to the formula

[0029] When the solidity is less than about about 30%, the shaped article may require support,
i.e., plastic casing, fiberboard box, or metal outer casing. Preferably, the polyolefin
fibers are compressed to a solidity of less than about 80%, more preferably less than
about 70%. When the solidity is greater than about 80%, the sorbency and cushioning
properties of the shipping container may be insufficient. When the polyolefin fibers
are provided as microfiber microwebs, the solidity of the article is most preferably
about 40 to 50% which provides a material which can be drilled or milled to the desired
shape and has excellent sorbency and cushioning properties.
[0030] Compression of the particles of polyolefin microfibers can be accomplished using
conventional compression molding equipment such as, for example, flash molding, or
powder molding equipment at ambient conditions. Generally, pressures in the range
of about 2 to 25 MPa are sufficient to achieve the desired degree of solidity. When
the particles are microfiber microwebs, pressures in the range of about 5 to 10 MPa
can preferably be used to achieve the preferred solidity of about 40 to 50%. Although
such pressures are used to compress the particles of microfibers to form the articles
of the invention, there is no significant fusing of the microfibers and no reduction
in the available microfiber surface area.
[0031] The articles and containers of the invention have excellent sorbency. The articles
and containers preferably exhibit a demand sorbency of at least about 0.5 l/m²/min,
more preferably at least about 1.0 l/m²/min, most preferably at least about 2.0 l/m²/min.
The articles and containers preferably exhibit an equilibrium sorption of at least
about 0.25 cm³/cm³, more preferably at least about 0.40 cm³/cm³, most preferably at
least about 0.60 cm³/cm³. The articles and containers preferably exhibit a centrifugal
retention of at least about 0.15 cm³/cm³, more preferably at least about 0.20 cm³/cm³.
[0032] The articles and containers of the invention possess good mechanical properties.
The tensile strength of the article or container material is preferably at least about
9 KPa, more preferably at least about 20 KPa, most preferably at least about 50 KPa.
The compressive strain energy of the article and container material is preferably
at least about 5 KJ/m³, more preferably at least about 20 KJ/m³, most preferably at
least about 40 KJ/m³.
[0033] The containers of the invention have excellent insulation properties. The containers
preferably have a thermal conductivity of less than about 1.5 x 10⁻⁴ cal/cm-sec-°C,
more preferably less than about 1.0 x 10⁻⁴ cal/cm-sec-°C at a temperature of 76°C.
[0034] The containers of the invention can serve as containers for storing and shipping
materials under cryogenic conditions when imbibed with liquid nitrogen. Preferably
the outside of the container is provided with insulation to reduce evaporation of
the liquid nitrogen.
[0035] Particulate and fibrous material can be introduced into the compressed polyolefin
microfiber structure by introducing particulate or fibrous material into the microfiber
web as it is being formed as described in U.S. Patents No. 3,971,373 (Braun), No.
4,118,531 (Hauser), No. 4,100,324 (Anderson et al.) and No. 4,429,001 (Kolpin et al.)
or by mixing the particulate or fibrous material with the milled or divellicated microfibers
prior to compression. Preferably, the particulate is introduced into the microfiber
web as it is being formed.
[0036] Particulate materials useful in the present invention include, but are not limited
to absorbent particulate materials, neutralizing particulate materials and catalytic
agents. Preferably, the amount of particulate incorporated in the compressed microfiber
structure is less than about 90 weight percent, more preferably less than about 75
weight percent, most preferably less than 50 weight percent.
[0037] Absorbent particulate materials useful with aqueous hazardous liquids include high
sorbency liquid sorbent particles such as, for example, water-insoluble modified starches
such as, for example, those sorbent particulates described in U.S. Patent No. 3,981,100,
and high molecular weight acrylic polymers containing hydrophilic groups. Among sorbent
particulate materials useful for sorbing liquids other than water are alkylstyrene
sorbent particles, such as Imbiber Beads™, available from Dow Chemical Company. Other
sorbent particulate materials include wood pulp and activated carbon, the activated
carbon being particularly useful for absorbing vapors which might evolve from the
hazardous material.
[0038] Neutralizing particulate materials useful in the present invention include, for example,
materials such as alumina, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, calcium carbonate,
etc. Catalytic particulate materials which can be introduced into the compressed polyolefin
microfiber structure include, for example, hopcalite and silver. Biological entities
such as enzymes or microbiological species which can catalyze the conversion of a
hazardous material into harmless by-products can also be incorporated into the articles
and containers of the present invention.
[0039] Preferably, the container of the present invention includes an outer covering. The
outer covering can be, for example, of fiberboard, metal, or thermoplastic material.
The preferred outer covering material is shrinkable thermoplastic film which is well
known in the art and can provide an additional, impervious layer to further ensure
containment of the hazardous material.
[0040] The containers of the present invention can be molded and, optionally, milled or
drilled to a wide variety of shapes such that a package of hazardous material can
be safely stored or shipped in the container. The size of the container is preferably
such that there is sufficient sorptive microfiber and particulate, if present, to
absorb, contain, or neutralize the hazardous material with some margin of safety.
[0041] FIG. 1 shows a preferred container 10 of the invention encasing a bottle 12 of hazardous
liquid. Container 10 has a lower section 14 and a lid 16, each of which are formed
of compressed polyolefin microfibers. Lid 16 has a protruding portion 18 which snugly
fits the cavity 22 of lower section 14. A covering of shrinkable thermoplastic film
20 is provided around the compressed polyolefin microfibers.
[0042] FIG. 2 shows a container 26 of the invention adapted for storage of test tubes. Such
a container is preferably molded as a block and then apertures 28 are drilled in the
block for accommodating the test tubes.
[0043] FIG. 3 shows a container 30 adapted for containing vials of hazardous liquid material.
The container has a base 32 and a lid 34 of compressed polyolefin microfibers. Such
a container is preferably molded as a block and base apertures 36 and lid apertures
38 are drilled into the block for accommodating vials 40.
[0044] The following examples further illustrate this invention, but the particular materials
and amounts thereof in these examples, as well as the conditions and details, should
not be construed to unduly limit this invention. In the examples, all parts and percentages
are by weight unless otherwise specified.
[0045] The following test methods were used to characterize the molded materials of the
invention:
Demand Sorbency Test
[0046] A 4.45 cm (1.75 inch) in diameter test sample of sorbent material was placed on a
25-50 micron porous plate in a filter funnel and a pressure of 1.0 KPa applied to
the sample by a plunger which was freely movable in the barrel of the funnel. Deionized
water at zero hydrostatic head was conducted from a reservoir through a siphon mechanism
to the upper surface of the porous plate where the test sample sorbed the water. The
initial lineal rate of absorbency was determined and reported in l/m²/min.
Equilibrium Sorption
[0047] A sample of sorbent material was placed in a bath of deionized water and allowed
to saturate for 24 hours. The sample was then removed from the bath and placed on
an open mesh screen for 10 minutes to allow for drainage of excess water. The amount
of water sorbed by a unit volume of material was determined and the equilibrium sorption
reported in cm³/cm³.
Centrifugal Retention Test
[0048] A sample of sorbent material, saturated to equilibrium (24 hr saturation time) with
deionized water, was placed in a centrifuge tube which was in turn placed in a centrifuge
and the sample subjected to a centrifugal force of 180G for 10 minutes. The sample
was removed from the centrifuge tube and the amount of water retained in the sample
determined. Centrifugal retention values are reported in terms of the volume of water
retained per unit volume of material (cm³/cm³).
Mechanical Properties - Tensile Strength
[0049] Dog-bone shaped test specimens are molded having a total surface area of 66.8 cm²
and a test area of 25.5 cm². The molded test specimens (face width 2.5 cm; length
10.2 cm) were tested for maximum tensile strength using an Instron Tensile test unit.
Evaluations were conducted using a X-head speed of 1.0 cm/min in accordance with ASTM
F152- 86 Method C.
Mechanical Properties - Compressive Stress/Strain Evaluations
[0050] Cylindrical specimens of 4.4 cm in diameter were subjected to compressive stress
using a Instron test unit incorporating a compression load cell. The deflection of
the specimen, for a given load, was recorded using a uniform loading rate up to an
ultimate loading of 689.5 KPa. The X-head speed of the test unit during the evaluation
was 1.0 cm/min. Strain energy of the test specimen was determined by calculating the
area under the stress/strain curve and is reported in KJ/m³.
Thermal Conductivity
[0051] Thermal conductivity analysis conducted under ASTM F-433 were performed on 5.1 cm
diameter cylindrical specimens of 1.3 cm in height and are reported in cal/cm-sec-°C.
Impact Energy Density
[0053] The impact energy density was determined according to ASTM Test Method D-3331.
Cushioning Efficiency
[0054] The cushioning efficiency is determined as described in "Shock Control," Arimond,
John,
Machine Design, May 21, 1987. In this test, a 10 Kg weight is dropped from varying distances onto
a given volume of material and the deceleration-time response is determined.
Surface Area
[0055] Surface area determination were conducted using BET nitrogen adsorption method.
Carbon Tetrachloride Vapor Adsorption
[0056] A sample of sorbent material, preconditioned at 100°C in a convection oven for 4
hours, was placed in a sealed dissector containing carbon tetrachloride on a porous
ceramic plate positioned about 2 cm above the level of the carbon tetrachloride. Weight
gain of the sample is determined gravimetrically after exposure to the vapor for 24
hours.
Example 1
[0057] A melt blown microfiber web was prepared as described in Wente, Van A., "Superfine
Thermoplastic Fibers,"
Industrial Engineering Chemistry, vol. 48, pp.1342-1346 using polypropylene resin (Dypro™ 50 MFR, available from Fina
Oil & Chemical Co.,). The fibers were sprayed with a surfactant solution (Aerosol™
OT, available from American Cyanamid Co.) at a rate to provide 2 percent surfactant
based on the weight of the fibers. The microfibers were about 6 to 8 microns in average
diameter. The web had a basis weight of 270 g/m², a density of 5.2x10⁻² g/cm³, a solidity
of 5.7%, and a void volume of 18.1 cm³/g. The web was tested for sorbency properties.
The results were demand sorbency: 4.95 l/m²/min; equilibrium sorption: 0.66 cm³/cm³;
and centrifugal retention: 0.39 cm³/cm³.
[0058] The microfiber web was divellicated as described in U.S. Patent No. 4,813,948 (Insley)
using a lickerin having a tooth density of 6.2 teeth/cm² and a speed of 900 rpm to
produce microfiber microwebs having an average nuclei diameter of 0.5 mm and an average
microweb diameter of 1.3 mm.
[0059] The microfiber microwebs (587 g) were placed in a compression mold and compressed
to form a cylindrical container having a solidity of 35%, an outside diameter of 14.2
cm, an inside diameter of 8.0 cm, and a height of 14.6 cm and top and bottom covers,
each having a diameter of 14.2 cm and a thickness of 1.9 cm. A glass jar (0.47L capacity)
containing 460 cm³ mineral oil was placed in the container, the covers were placed
at the ends of the container, and the completed container was vacuum wrapped using
0.5 mm thick polyethylene film.
[0060] The container was tested for durability using the National Safe Transit Association
Preshipment Drop Test Procedure Project 1A for package-products weighing under 100
pounds (45 kg) wherein the container was subjected to falls from up to sixty inches
without breakage of the glass jar. The container was also subjected to drops onto
concrete from a height of 30 feet without breakage of the glass jar.
[0061] The container without the top cover was tested for absorbency. The cavity of the
container was filled with light mineral oil and the level maintained at the cavity
top. At time intervals as set forth in Table 1, the oil was poured from the cavity,
the container weighed, and then the cavity refilled with oil. The rate of oil sorption
and equilibrium sorbency were determined. The data is set forth in Table 1.
Table 1
Time |
Weight |
Oil sorbed |
Oil sorbed |
Sorbency rate |
|
(min) |
(g) |
(g) |
(cm³) |
(l/m²/min) |
% Volume to saturation |
0 |
587 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
761 |
174 |
210 |
5.1 |
19 |
2 |
844 |
257 |
310 |
3.7 |
29 |
5 |
990 |
404 |
487 |
2.4 |
46 |
10 |
1155 |
568 |
684 |
1.7 |
64 |
15 |
1285 |
698 |
841 |
1.4 |
78 |
30 |
1374 |
786 |
947 |
0.8 |
87 |
60 |
1414 |
827 |
996 |
0.4 |
92 |
120 |
1433 |
846 |
1020 |
0.2 |
95 |
1440 |
1473 |
886 |
1070 |
- |
100 |
[0062] As can be seen from the data in Table 1, the container had an excellent sorbency
rate, sorbing close to 80% of its total capacity within fifteen minutes. The total
sorption capacity of the container was about 1-1/2 times the weight of the container.
Examples 2-46
[0063] In Examples 2-46, compressed particulate polyolefin microfiber materials suitable
for use in the articles and containers of the present invention were prepared using
the microfiber material and solidity indicated in Tables 2-4. Uncompressed microfiber
microweb material A was prepared according to the procedures of Example 1. The web
for microfiber material B was prepared according to to the procedures of Example 1.
The web was then introduced into a hammer mill (Champion Chop n Throw™ Shreader, available
from Champion Products, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN) operating at 500 rpm to produce highly
milled microfiber particles 2 to 40 mm in size, predominantly about 10 mm in size.
Material C was flash spun polyethylene fiber having a diameter of about 1 to 5 microns
and an average particle size of 1 to 6 mm (Tywick™ hazardous material pulp, available
from New Pig Corp., Altoona, PA).
Examples 2-16
[0064] In Examples 2-16, the particulate polyolefin microfiber materials were compressed
to form samples for tensile strength tests at nominal solidities of 30%, 40%, 50%,
60% and 70% using a hydraulic press to compress each sample. The compressed thickness,
recovered thickness (60 min after removal from the press), actual solidity and tensile
strength are reported in Table 2.
Table 2
|
|
Fiber weight |
Compressed thickness |
Recovered thickness |
Actual solidity |
Tensile strength |
Example |
Fiber |
(g) |
(cm) |
(cm) |
(%) |
(KPa) |
2 |
A |
29.4 |
1.1 |
1.7 |
29.0 |
9.0 |
3 |
B |
29.3 |
1.1 |
1.7 |
28.5 |
9.0 |
4 |
C |
29.6 |
0.9 |
1.7 |
28.8 |
5.5 |
5 |
A |
29.5 |
0.9 |
1.2 |
38.7 |
46.2 |
6 |
B |
29.6 |
0.9 |
1.2 |
38.8 |
51.0 |
7 |
C |
29.3 |
0.8 |
1.2 |
39.2 |
22.1 |
8 |
A |
30.0 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
50.7 |
303.5 |
9 |
B |
29.4 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
49.7 |
158.6 |
10 |
C |
29.3 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
49.5 |
75.9 |
11 |
A |
46.7 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
58.8 |
510.3 |
12 |
B |
46.5 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
58.5 |
482.8 |
13 |
C |
46.0 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
59.1 |
193.1 |
14 |
A |
54.5 |
1.1 |
1.3 |
68.6 |
1034.5 |
15 |
B |
54.2 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
69.6 |
965.5 |
16 |
C |
54.2 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
69.5 |
310.3 |
[0065] As can be seen from the data in Table 2, increasing the solidity of the compressed
polyolefin microfiber samples increased the tensile strength of the samples.
Examples 17-31
[0066] In Examples 17-31, the particles of polyolefin microfiber were compressed to form
samples for compression tests at nominal solidities of 30%, 40%, 50%, 60% and 70%
using a hydraulic press to compress each sample. The compressed thickness, recovered
thickness (60 min after removal from the press), actual solidity and strain energy
are reported in Table 3.
Table 3
|
|
Fiber weight |
Compressed thickness |
Recovered thickness |
Actual solidity |
Strain energy |
Example |
Fiber |
(g) |
(cm) |
(cm) |
(%) |
(KJ/m³) |
17 |
A |
27.7 |
4.4 |
7.0 |
27.8 |
67.4 |
18 |
B |
27.7 |
4.4 |
7.0 |
27.7 |
66.2 |
19 |
C |
27.6 |
3.5 |
6.8 |
28.3 |
76.1 |
20 |
A |
27.5 |
3.5 |
4.9 |
39.3 |
40.1 |
21 |
B |
27.7 |
3.5 |
5.2 |
37.4 |
50.0 |
22 |
C |
27.6 |
3.0 |
4.8 |
40.6 |
47.3 |
23 |
A |
27.6 |
3.0 |
3.9 |
49.1 |
35.6 |
24 |
B |
27.7 |
2.7 |
3.7 |
51.8 |
20.1 |
25 |
C |
27.9 |
2.7 |
3.8 |
51.3 |
52.2 |
26 |
A |
27.8 |
2.7 |
3.4 |
57.2 |
17.4 |
27 |
B |
27.7 |
2.5 |
3.1 |
61.8 |
11.7 |
28 |
C |
27.9 |
2.5 |
3.3 |
59.0 |
33.0 |
29 |
A |
27.8 |
2.3 |
2.8 |
70.4 |
5.3 |
30 |
B |
27.7 |
2.3 |
2.8 |
69.4 |
<5.0 |
31 |
C |
27.7 |
2.3 |
2.9 |
67.3 |
22.6 |
[0067] As can be seen from the data in Table 3, as the solidity of the compressed particles
of polyolefin microfibers increases, the strain energy decreases, indicating that
as the void volume is reduced the material becomes more rigid.
Examples 32-46
[0068] In Examples 32-46, the particles of polyolefin microfiber materials were compressed
to form samples for sorbency and retention tests at nominal solidities of 30%, 40%,
50%, 60% and 70% using a hydraulic press to compress each sample. The fiber weight,
compressed thickness, recovered thickness (60 min after removal from the press), and
actual solidity are reported in Table 4. The equilibrium sorption, demand sorbency
and centrifugal retention values for Examples 32-46 are reported in Table 5.
Table 4
|
|
Fiber weight |
Compressed thickness |
Recovered thickness |
Actual solidity |
Example |
Fiber |
(g) |
(cm) |
(cm) |
(%) |
32 |
A |
27.5 |
4.4 |
7.1 |
27.2 |
33 |
B |
29.9 |
4.4 |
7.7 |
27.4 |
34 |
C |
28.1 |
3.5 |
6.7 |
29.5 |
35 |
A |
27.8 |
3.5 |
4.9 |
39.8 |
36 |
B |
30.0 |
3.5 |
5.2 |
40.5 |
37 |
C |
28.0 |
3.0 |
4.8 |
40.9 |
38 |
A |
27.8 |
3.0 |
3.9 |
50.0 |
39 |
B |
30.1 |
3.0 |
4.0 |
52.8 |
40 |
C |
27.8 |
2.7 |
3.9 |
50.6 |
41 |
A |
27.7 |
2.7 |
3.3 |
58.9 |
42 |
B |
30.1 |
2.7 |
3.5 |
61.1 |
43 |
C |
27.2 |
2.5 |
3.2 |
59.7 |
44 |
A |
28.0 |
2.3 |
2.8 |
71.3 |
45 |
B |
27.5 |
2.3 |
2.7 |
71.5 |
46 |
C |
27.7 |
2.3 |
2.8 |
69.5 |
Table 5
|
Equilibrium sorption |
Demand sorbency |
Centrifugal retention |
Example |
(cm³/cm³) |
(l/m²min) |
(cm³/cm³) |
32 |
1.02 |
5.47 |
0.24 |
33 |
0.88 |
5.73 |
0.22 |
34 |
1.01 |
5.54 |
0.20 |
35 |
0.64 |
2.38 |
0.18 |
36 |
0.61 |
3.16 |
0.20 |
37 |
0.84 |
3.09 |
0.24 |
38 |
0.48 |
1.87 |
0.19 |
39 |
0.48 |
1.48 |
0.20 |
40 |
0.62 |
1.48 |
0.28 |
41 |
0.37 |
1.35 |
0.20 |
42 |
0.32 |
0.90 |
0.18 |
43 |
0.52 |
1.00 |
0.27 |
44 |
0.24 |
0.84 |
0.19 |
45 |
0.28 |
0.52 |
0.19 |
46 |
0.35 |
0.19 |
0.26 |
[0069] The data in Tables 4 and 5 demonstrate that as void volume is reduced in the molded
material a reduction in both equilibrium sorbency and demand sorbency is experienced.
Centrifugal retention is maintained essentially the same regardless of solidity indicating
that the effective surface area of the materials is not reduced with densification.
Examples 47-50 and Comparative Examples C1 and C2
[0070] In Examples 47-50, a melt blown microfiber web was prepared and divellicated as in
Example 1 to form microfiber microwebs. Portions of the microfiber microwebs were
molded under varying amounts of pressure as set forth in Table 6. The resulting compressed
polyolefin microfiber materials were characterized and tested for equilibrium sorption
with light mineral oil together with a sample of the melt blown microfiber web prior
to divellication (Comparative Example C1) and a sample of the microfiber microwebs
prior to compression (Comparative Example C2). The results are set forth in Table
6.
Table 6
|
Fiber weight |
Molding pressure |
Recovered thickness |
Actual solidity |
Equilibrium sorbency |
Example |
(g) |
(MPa) |
(cm) |
(%) |
(cm³/cm³) |
C1 |
- |
- |
- |
10.9 |
0.83 |
C2 |
- |
- |
- |
9.8 |
1.25 |
47 |
16.6 |
2.1 |
3.5 |
24.4 |
1.02 |
48 |
15.4 |
4.2 |
2.1 |
37.7 |
0.94 |
49 |
11.2 |
8.4 |
0.9 |
63.6 |
0.65 |
50 |
21.9 |
21.0 |
1.3 |
86.3 |
0.31 |
[0071] As can be seen from the data in Table 6, as the molding pressure increases, the solidity
increases and the equilibrium sorbency decreases.
Examples 51-53
[0072] In Examples 51-53, compressed polyolefin microfiber particles were prepared as in
Examples 48-50, characterized and tested for equilibrium sorption with water. The
results are set forth in Table 7.
Table 7
|
Fiber weight |
Molding pressure |
Recovered thickness |
Actual solidity |
Equilibrium sorbency |
Example |
(g) |
(MPa) |
(cm) |
(%) |
(cm³/cm³) |
51 |
15.2 |
4.2 |
1.7 |
45.8 |
0.68 |
52 |
16.3 |
8.4 |
1.5 |
55.7 |
0.42 |
53 |
17.6 |
21.0 |
1.2 |
75.4 |
0.21 |
[0073] As can be seen from the data in Table 7, as the molding pressure increases, the solidity
increases and the equilibrium sorbency decreases.
Examples 56-58 and Comparative Examples C3-C6
[0074] In Examples 56-58, compressed polyolefin microfiber materials were prepared using
fiber materials A, B, and C as described with regard to Examples 2-46 at a nominal
solidity of 40%. The compressed thickness, recovered thickness, actual solidity are
set forth in Table 8. The materials of each of Examples 56-58 were tested for cushion
efficiency. The impact energy density, peak acceleration and cushion efficiency are
set forth in Table 9. The impact energy density and cushion efficiency reported for
various foam materials in U.S. Patent No. 4,584,822 including a urethane ester foam
(Comparative Example C3), a polystyrene foam (Comparative Example C4), a polyethylene
foam (Comparative Example C5), and a low density polyurethane foam (Comparative Example
C6) are also reported in Table 9.
Table 8
|
|
Fiber weight |
Compressed thickness |
Recovered thickness |
Actual solidity |
Example |
Fiber |
(g) |
(cm) |
(cm) |
(%) |
56 |
A |
27.8 |
3.5 |
5.2 |
37.4 |
57 |
B |
27.8 |
3.5 |
5.5 |
35.2 |
58 |
C |
27.7 |
3.0 |
4.9 |
39.8 |
Table 9
|
Impact energy density |
Peak deceleration |
Cushion efficiency |
Example |
(KJ/m³) |
(g's) |
(J) |
56 |
117 |
8.5 |
4 |
234 |
18 |
4.5 |
352 |
30 |
5 |
57 |
110 |
6.6 |
3.5 |
221 |
17 |
4.5 |
331 |
25 |
4.5 |
58 |
131 |
8 |
4 |
255 |
17 |
4 |
386 |
30 |
5 |
C3 |
117 |
- |
8.3 |
C4 |
117 |
- |
6 |
C5 |
117 |
- |
5 |
C6 |
117 |
- |
3.5 |
[0075] As can be seen from the data in Table 9, the materials of the invention provided
better cushioning efficiency than did the comparative foam materials, except the low
density polyurethane foam. Although each of the foam materials of Comparative Examples
C3-C6 provides some cushioning effect, each of the materials is substantially non-absorbent.
Example 59
[0076] A cylindrical container was prepared as in Example 1. The bottom cover was placed
on the cylinder and a 0.5 mm thick layer of polyethylene was applied to the outer
surface to unify the cylinder and cover and to provide a liquid barrier. Liquid nitrogen
was charged into the open container until 450 g was imbibed and a thermocouple was
placed in the open cavity. The liquid nitrogen imbibed container was placed in a secondary
container of styrofoam having a wall thickness of 2.5 cm at an ambient room temperture
of 21°C. The container was inverted after imbibation to allow any free liquid nitrogen
to escape. In the inverted position, the temperature of the open cavity of the container
was monitored with ambient room temperature maintained at 21°C. The resulting temperatures
are set forth in Table 10.
Table 10
Time |
Temperature |
(hrs) |
(°C) |
0 |
-189 |
1 |
-191 |
2 |
-195 |
3 |
-192 |
4 |
-125 |
5 |
-80 |
6 |
-49 |
7 |
-27 |
8 |
-14 |
9 |
-3 |
10 |
+1 |
[0077] As can be seen from the data in Table 10, the nitrogen remained imbibed in the container
walls until it boiled off, maintaining its initial temperature for at least three
hours.
Example 61 and Comparative Examples C7 and C8
[0078] A microfiber web was prepared as described in U.S. Patent No. 3,971,373 (Braun) having
a total basis weight of 200 g/m² and containing 60 weight percent activated carbon
(PCB 30x140, available from Calgon Corp.) and 40 weight percent microfibers melt blown
using polypropylene resin (Dypro™ 50 MFR). The web was divellicated as described in
Example 1 to form microfiber microwebs. The microwebs (23 g) were then compressed
under 8.4 MPa pressure in a 5.1 cm diameter mold to produce material 5.2 cm in diameter,
2.2 cm thick and having a solidity of 32% when calculated according to the formula

This molded material was then tested for carbon tetrachloride uptake capacity. Also
tested were a sample of activated carbon (Comparative Example C7) and a sample of
molded material containing no activated carbon prepared according to the procedure
of Example 26 (Comparative Example C8) using 27.4 g microfiber microwebs to obtain
material 2.7 cm thick, 4.5 cm in diameter, and having a solidity of 57%. The results
are set forth in Table 11.
Table 11
|
Sorbed weight |
Amount sorbed |
Sorption ratio |
Carbon sorption ratio |
Example |
(g) |
(g) |
(g/g) |
(g/g) |
60 |
31.5 |
8.5 |
0.37 |
0.62 |
C7 |
19.5 |
7.0 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
C8 |
27.5 |
0.1 |
0.004 |
-- |
[0079] As can be seen from the data in Table 11, the activated carbon retains sorptive effectiveness
when loaded into a microfiber web which is then divellicated and molded. This retention
of effectiveness is a result of the open pore structure of the microfiber component
and the availability of activated carbon sorption surfaces even after molding.
Example 61
[0080] Compressed polyolefin microfiber particulate material was prepared as in Example
32 and tested for thermal conductivity. The thermal conductivity was 1.5 x 10⁻⁴ cal/cm-sec-°C
at a temperature of 76°C.
Example 62
[0081] Compressed polyolefin microfiber particulate material was prepared as in Example
44 and analyzed for surface area. The surface area was 1.54 m²/g. The surface area
of the microfiber web used to prepare the microfiber microwebs was also analyzed for
surface area which was found to be about 1.2 m²/g. That the surface area of the compressed
polyolefin microfiber material was not significantly different from that of the microfiber
web tends to indicate that substantially no fiber bonding occurred during the molding
process.
[0082] The various modifications and alterations of this invention will be apparent to those
skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of this invention and
this invention should not be restricted to that set forth herein for illustrative
purposes.