[0001] This is a continuation-in-part of United States patent application Serial No. 342,811,
filed April 25, 1989.
[0002] This invention pertains to processes for the reductive amination of carbonylnitriles
and similar compounds, which processes can exhibit desired activities and selectivities
for amination and which processes can be conducted under convenient process conditions
including relatively low pressures. Advantageously, the processes of this invention,
even using the low pressures provide enhanced catalyst life.
Background to the Invention
[0003] Ketonitriles such as 3-cyano-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexanone (isophoronenitrile) have
been used as reactants to prepare the corresponding diamine such as 3-(aminomethyl)-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohezylamine
(isophoronediamine). These processes have generally involved the hydrogenation of
the ketonitrile in the presence of ammonia and catalyst.
[0004] Schmitt, et al., in U.S. Patent No. 3,352,913, which is based upon the same priority
document as British Patent Specification 972,010, published October 7, 1964, disclose
hydrogenating isophoronenitrile in the presence of catalysts
"especially those containing iron, cobalt, nickel, palladium and platinum and other
Group VIII elements, such as ruthenium, rhodium, osmium, iridium, on supports such
as diatomaceous earth, bentonite, montmorillonite, γ-alumina, kieselguhr, activated
coal etc., with additives such as copper, chromium, thorium, etc. as desired." (Column
2, lines 17 to 23)
The process is said to be conducted at a temperature between 50° to 150°C, and the
patentees caution that "...it is best to see to it that partial pressure of the hydrogen
does not fall below about 50 atmospheres." The production of the diamine is favored
by a proportion of 10 to 30 moles of ammonia per mole of ketonitrile.
[0005] The patentees note that:
"...it has been known that ketonitriles can be hydrogenated, but in the particular
case of the γ-ketonitriles they cannot be hydrogenated because they have a much greater
tendency than the other ketonitriles to evolve hydrogen cyanide. Under the special
conditions of the process of the invention, however, such phenomenon can be avoided."
(Column 2, lines 62 to 68)
[0006] In essence, to prevent, or reduce, evolution of hydrogen cyanide, the amination process
involved the use of very high hydrogen partial pressures, e.g., 50 atmospheres or
more. Indeed, in the examples illustrating the amination of ketonitriles, Schmitt,
et al., used hydrogen overpressures of 120 to 150 atmospheres. Experimental work using
lower hydrogen partial pressures has confirmed the evolution of hydrogen cyanide from
isophoronenitrile and a reduction in yield of the corresponding diamine. Moreover,
the hydrogen cyanide appears to poison the hydrogenation catalyst.
[0007] Schmitt, et al., broadly state that:
"The process can be performed expediently in the presence of solvents, particularly
the alcohols, such as methyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol, etc., and ether, but also hydrocarbons
in general such as cyclohexane or the like." (Column 2, lines 69 to 72).
The only solvent explicitly demonstrated by the patentees is methanol.
[0008] Considerable efforts have been devoted to producing diamines from ketonitriles with
desirable selectivities to the diamine. Additional efforts have been directed to achieving
these results without the need for such high pressures.
[0009] Japanese patent application Kokai 62/123154, published November 25, 1985 (Daicel)
is directed to the use of a Raney cobalt catalyst containing manganese as an additional
component, which catalyst is used for the manufacture of isophoronediamine. The patent
application notes that in the prior art, the reductive amination of isophoronenitrile
was conducted at extremely high hydrogen pressures (120 to 150 atmospheres) with pulverized
catalyst, and even then the yields to the isophoronediamine were low, e.g., 81.4%.
The Japanese patent applicant asserts that with the specified catalyst, milder reaction
conditions may be used. The examples report obtaining 83.3 to 89.6 percent yields
of the isophoronediamine in the reaction solution with 3.9 to 5.6 percent of the 3-cyano-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexanol
hydrogenation product. While other changes exist, the hydrogen partial pressure is
increased from 70 kg/cm² in Example 2 to 100 kg/cm 2 in Example 3. The yield of isophoronediamine
in the crude reaction solution increased from 83.3 percent to 87.5 percent even though
the ratio of catalyst to isophoronenitrile decreased. Hence, hydrogen partial pressure
still appears to play a significant role in achieving the sought diamine product.
[0010] The Japanese patent application indicates that alcohols and glycols containing 1
to 4 carbon atoms (e.g., methanol, ethanol, ethylene glycol, etc.) can be appropriately
used. Only methanol is used as the solvent in the working examples.
[0011] West German patent application 3,011,656 discloses a continuous process for making
isophoronediamine from isophoronenitrile by reacting the nitrile with ammonia at a
temperature of about 40° to 100°C in the absence of catalyst to form 3-cyano-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexyl
imine, and then hydrogenating the imine in the presence of cobalt-, nickel- or iron-containing
catalyst to form the diamine. The patent application states that the hydrogen concentration
during the formation of the imine should not exceed 0.05 weight percent. The example
indicates that the process is conducted at a pressure of about 300 bar.
[0012] U.S. Patent No. 4,429,157 discloses a process for making amines from, e.g., isophoronenitrile
by reacting the keto group with ammonia in the presence of an imine-forming catalyst
which is an ion exchanger loaded with ammonium ion, and then subjecting the nitrile-containing
imine to hydrogenation in the presence of ammonia and hydrogen in the presence of
a hydrogenation catalyst. The patentees state that the imine-forming reaction may
be conducted at 10° to 120°C under autogenous or elevated pressure, e.g., up to 300
bar. The amination is then conducted at a temperature of 80° to 200°C and elevated
pressure, i.e., 80 to 300 bar.
[0013] U.S. Patent No. 2,292,949 discloses processes for catalytic hydrogenation of 2-iminonitriles.
The patentees state that the hydrogen partial pressure for the hydrogenation should
be at least about 10 atmospheres with the total pressure within the range of 1500
to 3000 pounds per square inch and the temperature is between about 50° to 170°C,
preferably between 100° and 150°C. Hydrogen is added from time to time, if necessary,
to maintain the total pressure within the working range. The hydrogenation is preferably
conducted using a nickel or a cobalt catalyst. Anhydrous ammonia is present to "stabilize
the imino group and minimize condensation" (column 2, lines 38 and 39). The patentees
state at column 2, line 45 to column 3, line 7:
"Other solvents are not essential for the successful operation of the process, although
in many instances the use of an organic solvent has been found beneficial in improving
yields and reducing the conversion to degradation and other by-products. Hydrocarbons,
alcohols, and ethers are among the preferred solvents as exemplified by toluene, methanol,
and dioxane. These materials are but typical examples, and a wide variety of other
solvents of the same general class can be used with good effect. Generally speaking,
if a solvent is employed, it is preferred to use methanol, owing to its low cost,
freedom from catalyst poisons, excellent solvent action on both the starting materials
and products, and ease with which it is separated from the crude hydrogenation mixtures
without introducing needless product losses."
[0014] U.S. Patent No. 3,544,485 discloses a method for activating Raney alloy catalysts
for hydrogenation. The activation is conducted in the presence of water and one of
aluminas, amines, non-N-substituted lactams, N-substituted lactams, oximes, N-substituted
acid amides and urea derivatives. The patentees suggest that the hydrogenation and
activation can occur simultaneously. In Table III, Experiments 15, 16, 17, 21, 23,
26, 29, 32, 39, 43, 44, 46, 50, 54, 57 and 62 involve hydrogenation of nitriles to
amines. Experiments 35 and 39 involve hydrogenating cyclohexanoneoxime to cyclohexylamine.
Summary of the Invention
[0015] By this invention processes are provided for aminating carbonylnitriles and iminonitriles
(starting materials) in which the nitrile group is less reactive than the carbonyl
or imino group to provide amino group under the same conditions, at relatively low
pressures without undue decomposition of the nitrile (generation of hydrogen cyanide)
while achieving high selectivities to the amine product. Frequently, the nitrile group
of the starting materials of the present invention is on a tertiary carbon, and, in
many instances, the nitrile group is on the beta carbon atom from that of the carbonyl
or imino function. The processes involve first aminating the carbonyl or imino group
in the presence of hydrogen and a catalyst at sufficiently low temperature to avoid
decomposition of the nitrile portion of the molecule (e.g., into HCN) and then hydrogenating
the nitrile group under more severe conditions comprising at least one of (a) the
use of higher temperature and (b) the use of more active hydrogenation catalyst. Once
the carbonyl or imino group is converted to an amino group, the aminonitrile is frequently
more stable to degradation.
[0016] Accordingly, the hydrogenation need not be conducted at the high pressure and/or
with high catalyst concentrations which have heretofore been proposed to achieve selectivity
to the aminated compound and to avoid deactivation of the catalyst, e.g., by generation
of hydrogen cyanide or other nitrile products or by generation of deleterious moieties
from other components in the reaction menstruum such as carbon monoxide, which, among
other things, can poison the catalyst. Indeed, pressures of less than 700 psig (48
bar), often less than 500 psig (34 bar), are suitable in the processes of this invention.
The ability to use relatively low pressures, e.g., under 500 psig, can materially
reduce the equipment capital and operating expenses associated with aminating carbonylnitriles
or iminonitriles.
[0017] Advantageously, both the amination and hydrogenation can be conducted in the presence
of a catalytically active amount of hydrogenation catalyst such as cobalt-, nickel-
and iron-containing catalyst, especially cobalt-containing catalyst such as Raney
cobalt catalyst.
[0018] In another aspect of this invention, amination promoters are present in an amount
sufficient during the amination to accomplish at least one of (i) enhancing the rate
of amination of the carbonyl and/or imino groups, (ii) reducing the rate of catalyst
deactivation, and (iii) increasing the selectivity to the aminated product rather
than generating aminoalcohols or hydroxynitriles. The amination promoters are especially
advantageous when lower pressures, e.g., less than about 700 psig (48 bar), are employed.
Amination promoters include dipolar protic compounds, especially those having a pK
a at 25°C in a 0.4 to 1 weight per cent solution in dimethylsulfoxide of less than
about 35, and they often have high dielectric constants, e.g., greater than about
8, preferably greater than 15, at 25°C.
Detailed Discussion
[0019] Diamino- and polyamino-compounds find a wide range of utilities including as cross-linking
agents for epoxy resins and intermediates to other useful compounds such as oil additives,
dispersants, and isocyanates. Particularly as cross-linking agents, it is often desirable
to have different reactivities among the functional groups. Thus, compounds such as
isophoronediisocyanate can find advantageous utility in urethane polymerization systems
since the primary isocyanate group is more reactive than the secondary isocyanate
group.
[0020] The diamino- and polyamino-compounds can be prepared from carbonylnitriles and iminonitriles
by reaction in the presence of hydrogen and, in the case of carbonylnitriles, at least
one of ammonia or primary amine and secondary amine. Included among the carbonylnitriles
useful in the present invention are carbonylnitriles
per se, and compounds that generate carbonylnitriles under process conditions. Exemplary
carbonylnitriles are those represented by the structural formula

wherein R¹, R², R³ and R⁴ are the same or different and are selected from the group
consisting of hydrogen, alkyl (e.g., 1 to 8 carbon atoms), cycloalkyl (e.g., 5 to
8 carbon atoms), aryl (e.g., monocyclic or bicyclic aryl of 6 to 12 carbon atoms),
aralkyl (e.g., of 7 to 12 carbon atoms), and alkaryl (e.g., of 7 to 12 carbon atoms),
wherein at least R¹ and R² are other than hydrogen; and R⁵ is hydrogen, alkyl (e.g.,
1 to 8 carbons), cycloalkyl (e.g., 5 to 8 carbon atoms), aryl (e.g., monocyclic or
bicyclic of 6 to 12 carbon atoms), alkaryl (e.g., 7 to 12 carbon atoms), aralkyl (e.g.
7 to 12 carbon atoms) and R⁵ may form a cyclic compound with a carbon atom of one
of R¹ and R³. Frequently, the nitrile group is on the beta carbon to the carbon atom
of the carbonyl group or further removed therefrom, and most preferably on the beta
carbon atom. Exemplary of specific carbonylnitriles are isophoronenitrile, 4-methyl-5-cyanohexan-3-one,
4-methyl-4-cyanopentan-2-one, 2-methyl-3-cyanopentanal, 2-ethyl-3-cyanohexanal, 3,
5-dicyano-3, 5-dimethylcyclohexanone, 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-ketopimelonitrile, and
3-cyano-3-methylcyclohexanone.
[0021] The preferred iminonitriles useful in the processes of this invention have substituted
imino groups, e.g., with lower alkyl (e.g., 1 to 8 carbon atoms), cycloalkyl (e.g.,
5 to 8 carbon atoms), aryl (e.g., monocyclic or bicyclic aryl of 6 to 12 carbon atoms),
aralkyl (e.g., 7 to 12 carbon atoms), and alkaryl (e.g., 7 to 12 carbon atoms). Often,
the iminonitriles can be represented by the structural formula

wherein R¹, R², R³, R⁴ and R⁵ are the same as set forth for the carbonylnitriles
above and R⁶ is as described above and may be hydrogen. The nitrile group is preferably
on the beta or further distant carbon atom from the imino carbon atom, most preferably
the beta carbon atom. Compounds which generate iminonitriles under reacton conditions
are also included. Examples of iminonitriles are 3-cyano-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexyl
cyclohexylimine, and 3-cyano-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexyl methylimine.
[0022] While not wishing to be limited to theory, it is believed that the carbonyl group
is converted in the presence of ammonia or primary amine to an imino group prior to
reductive amination. The instability of the nitrile group is believed to be exacerbated
by the carbonyl group (particularly when the carbonyl and nitrile are in a beta spacial
relationship) and, to a lesser or similar extent, by the imino group. Therefore, in
effecting the amination of a carbonyl group, conditions which facilitate the conversion
to the imino group and thus to the amino group are preferably employed. In a preferred
aspect of the invention, at least a portion of the carbonyl groups are converted to
imino groups to provide a preformed iminonitrile for subsequent amination to produce
the aminonitrile. The carbonyl group may also be reacted with secondary amine to form
enamine which can then be hydrogenated or reductively aminated in the presence of
ammonia to form the aminonitrile.
[0023] The conversion of the carbonyl group to an imino group or enamino group can proceed
under the reductive amination conditions used to produce the amine. Under reductive
amination conditions, the carbonyl group can be converted to a hydroxyl group which
may be difficult to dehydrogenate under the reductive amination conditions. Hence,
conditions which favor the formation of the imino group or enamino group (and the
amino group) are desired to minimize the hydrogenation of the carbonyl group. If the
hydroxyl is not dehydrogenated to the carbonyl group and ultimately converted to an
amino group, an aminoalcohol is formed which represents a loss of efficiency to the
desired diamine.
[0024] Several techniques can be used to enhance the selectivity to the amine product as
opposed to the aminoalcohol or hydroxynitrile, for instance: (i) a catalyst may be
used which is more effective at the hydrogenation of imino groups than the hydrogenation
of carbonyl groups; and/or (ii) the equilibrium between the carbonyl and imino groups
can be shifted towards the formation of imino groups, e.g., by removal of by-product
water and/or the use of primary amines to form the imino groups or secondary amines
to form enamino groups which are then converted to the aminonitriles; and/or (iii)
the use of amination promoters which tend to favor the formation of the imino and/or
amino groups; and/or (iv) operating at reduced or no hydrogen partial pressure until
the imino groups are formed.
[0025] The amines which may be used to form imino groups or enamino groups have the formula
R₂NH wherein R may be hydrogen, alkyl, hydroxyl, hydroxyalkyl, aminoalkyl, aryl, hydroxyaryl,
aminoaryl, amino and the like of up to 20 carbon atoms provided that no more than
one R may be hydrogen. The imine or enamine may then be subjected to reductive amination
conditions comprising the presence of ammonia and hydrogen to produce primary amine
or hydrogenated to produce secondary amine or tertiary amine. The amine may conveniently
be the product amine, e.g., isophoronediamine when isophoronenitrile is used as the
starting material.
[0026] The amination of the carbonyl or imino group is generally conducted at a temperature
of about 10° to 90°C, preferably 15° to 85°C, and a pressure from autogenous to elevated.
High pressures, e.g., 1500 psig or more, may be used. However, lower pressures are
often suitable, e.g., less than about 700 psig, e.g., from about 100 to 500 psig.
The temperature is below that which causes under the reaction conditions undue decomposition,
such as generation of hydrogen cyanide. Preferably, less than 0.01 mole, most preferably
less than 0.001 mole of hydrogen cyanide is generated per mole of nitrile in the feed.
[0027] Ammonia and/or amine (nitrogen source) is typically provided in an amount of at least
1.5 mole of -NHR per equivalent of carbonyl or imino group, often about 5 to 50, preferably
10 to 30 moles of -NHR per mole of carbonyl or imino group. Hydrogen is also present
in an amount of at least 5 moles per mole of carbonyl or imino group, e.g., from about
5 to 1000 or more moles per mole of carbonyl or imino group. The hydrogen is often
used as the pressurizing gas in the reactor. Hence, the partial pressure of hydrogen
is often about 50 to 1500 psig. Frequently, the partial pressure of hydrogen is at
least about 30, say, about 50 to 95, percent of the total absolute pressure of the
reaction system.
[0028] Advantageously, the lower total pressures and the lower hydrogen partial pressures
which can be used in accordance with the preferred aspects of this invention can provide
enhanced selectivity to the aminonitriles as opposed to aminoalcohols or hydroxynitriles
when aminating carbonylnitriles.
[0029] This amination step is conducted in the presence of a hydrogenation catalyst, and
the catalyst may be the same as used in the subsequent hydrogenation of the nitrile
groups. Hydrogenation catalysts comprise compounds and metals of Group VIII of the
Periodic Table of the Elements, e.g., platinum group metals, as well as chromium,
manganese, copper, zinc, molybdenum, tungsten, and rhenium and combinations such as
copper chromite. Preferred catalysts comprise cobalt-, iron- or nickel-containing
catalysts, especially Raney nickel and Raney cobalt catalysts. The Raney nickel and
Raney cobalt catalysts may contain additional elements to enhance activity or selectivity.
These promoting elements (which may be present in elemental or chemically-combined
form) include manganese, chromium and the like. The most preferred catalysts are Raney
cobalt catalysts, especially those containing 0.01 to 10 weight percent manganese
and/or chromium.
[0030] Those catalysts capable of being supported may be placed on suitable carriers such
as alumina, carbon, kieselguhr, bentonite, asbestos, silica, titania, zirconia, etc.
The active compounds may be provided in an amount of 0.5 to 50 weight percent of the
total supported catalyst.
[0031] The amount of catalyst provided will depend upon the activity of the catalyst and
the form of the catalyst and the type of reactor used. In general for slurry reactors,
the catalyst is provided in an amount of at least about 0.02 gram per gram of the
carbonylnitrile or iminonitrile, e.g., often about 0.05 to 2, preferably 0.1 to 1,
grams per gram of the carbonylnitrile or iminonitrile. Even though low hydrogen partial
pressures may be used in accordance with this invention, the processes may still exhibit
good catalyst life and enable the use of relatively small amounts of catalyst.
[0032] The reaction may be conducted in a batch, semicontinuous or continuous reactor. In
the semicontinuous mode, a preferred operation is by continuously or periodically
adding the carbonylnitrile or iminonitrile to the reaction medium. The catalyst may
be a fixed bed catalyst or may be in the form of a slurry. Homogeneous catalysts may
also be used. Slurry reaction systems are generally preferred with Raney nickel and
Raney cobalt catalysts. Raney cobalt catalysts are often the most preferred.
[0033] The reaction time for aminating the carbonyl or imino group is preferably sufficient
to enable at least about 90 percent, preferably at least about 95 percent, preferably
essentially all of the carbonylnitrile or imine groups to be consumed. Frequently,
the reaction is conductcd until the hydrogen up-take rate becomes very slow. Often,
the reaction time is at least about 0.01 hour, e.g., about 0.05 to 50, say, about
0.1 to 5 hours.
[0034] The reaction is typically conducted in the presence of a suitable solvent, i.e.,
one which is substantially inert in respect of being aminated or reacting with the
nitrile feed or product under the reaction conditions. Solvents include hydrocarbons
including aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons such as butane, isobutane, pentane,
cyclopentane, hexane, cyclohexane, isopentane, benzene, ethylbenzene, xylene, toluene,
etc.; alcohols containing 1 to about 6 carbon atoms such as methanol, ethanol, n-propanol,
isopropanol, n-butanol, isobutanol, t-butanol, n-pentanol, 2-pentanol, 3-pentanol,
hexanol, cyclohexanol, phenol, etc.; tertiary amines such as triethanolamine, triethylamine,
diethanolethylamine, etc.; pyridine; piperazine; morpholine; diols of 1 to about 6
carbon atoms such as ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol, 1,4-butanediol,
1,2-butanediol and 2,3-butanediol; and ethers of 1 to about 6 carbon atoms such as
dimethylether, diethylether, methylethylether, diethylene glycol, diethylene glycol
monomethyl ether, propylene glycol monomethyl ether, ethylene glycol dimethyl ether,
triethylene glycol dimethyl ether, Cryptands, triethylene glycol, tetraethylene glycol,
tetrahydrofuran, etc. The solvents containing hydroxy groups may react to some extent
during the reductive amination; however, this reaction is typically minimal, especially
with the hydroxyl group being on a secondary or tertiary carbon atom. Preferably,
the solvent does not contain components, or is not readily degenerated or converted
into components under reaction conditions, that are deleterious to the catalyst such
as carbon monoxide, sulfur, halide, hydrogen cyanide, etc. Thus, often, the solvents
have more than one carbon atom and have an essential absence of sulfur, halide, and
nitrile. Advantageously, the solvent provides a reaction mixture at 25°C having a
viscosity of less than about 50, preferably less than about 25, centipoise. When a
solvent is used, it is often provided in a weight ratio to the carbonylnitrile or
iminonitrile of at least about 0.5:1, say, about 0.5:1 to 20:1.
[0035] The nature and amount of the solvent should not be such that the catalyst becomes
unduly deactivated during the amination under the conditions of the amination. Heretofore,
methanol has been used as the solvent in the amination of, e.g., carbonylnitriles,
but only at high pressures. At lower pressures, especially at pressures below about
700 psig as are preferred in accordance with this invention, catalysts in methanol
solvent tend to deactivate rapidly. At higher pressures, e.g., 1500 psig and more,
such as used in the references described in the Background to the Invention Section,
the rate of deactivation in a methanol menstruum is substantially reduced.
[0036] In accordance with a preferred aspect of the invention, amination promoter, which
may comprise solvent, is provided in the reaction menstruum during the amination.
The amination promoters are dipolar protic compounds and are preferably liquid at
reaction conditions. Generally, the amination promoters exhibit a pK
a at 25°C in a 0.4 to 1 weight per cent solution in dimethyl sulfoxide less than about
35, preferably, less than about 30, often, about 1 to 30. The procedure is disclosed
in Matthews, et al.,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol 97, pp 7006 to 7014 (1975), herein incorporated by reference. Amination promoters
having lower pK
a values are frequently used in lower concentrations to avoid adversely affecting the
catalyst. Often the amination promoters have a dielectric constant of at least about
8, preferably at least about 15, at 25°C and sometimes have a dipole moment greater
than about 1 Debye. The preferred amination promoters are organic compounds having
more than one carbon atom. Advantageous promoters contain at least one hydroxyl group,
and preferably contain 2 or more hydroxyl groups, per molecule and include monoalcohols,
diols, triols and polyols, especially having a molecular weight of less than about
200. Promoters include methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, iso-propanol, n-butanol, iso-butanol,
t-butanol, ethylene glycol, 1,2-propylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol, 1,2-butanediol,
1,3-butanediol, 1,4-butanediol, 2,3-butanediol, glycerol, diethylene glycol, triethylene
glycol, tetraethylene glycol, sorbitol, pentanediols, hexanediols, diethylmonoethanolamine,
diethanolmonoethylamine, triethanolamine, phenols, piperazine, morpholine, hydroxyethylethylene
urea, hydroxyesters, hydroxyamides, amides and the like. Preferably, the promoter
does not contain reactive hydrogens such as on primary and secondary amines and is
devoid of groups which can be hydrogenated or aminated under reaction conditions such
as carbonyl, imine, and nitrile groups. Desirably, the amination promoter does not
contain certain components, or is not readily degenerated or converted to components
under reaction conditions, that are deleterious to the catalyst such as carbon monoxide,
sulfur, hydrogen cyanide, halide, etc.
[0037] The amount of promoter that is present may vary widely, e.g., up to the total amount
of solvent present when the solvent comprises promoter. Often, the nitrile to be aminated
of at least about 0.05:1, preferably at least about 0.1:1. say, about 0.1:1 to 20:1
or more. Preferably, the amount of promoter does not unduly increase the viscosity
of the reaction menstruum which preferably has a viscosity of less than about 25 centipoise
at 25°C.
[0038] Advantageously, monoalcohols and diols having 1 to 3 carbon atoms are used in conjunction
with another solvent. In some instances, these lower molecular weight alcohols can
deactivate or otherwise adversely affect the catalyst, especially at lower hydrogen
partial pressures, e.g., below about 1000 psig, say, below about 700 psig. Also, ethylene
glycol and other diol or polyol-containing promoters can lead to undesirable viscosities
and/or foaming on depressurization. Further, some promoters can tend to promote, or
allow to occur, condensation reactions between nitriles and amines. This disadvantage
can often be eliminated or limited by using (i) combinations of promoters and solvents
other than promoters or (ii) combinations of promoters having deleterious side effects
with those promoters not exhibiting the undesirable side effects, yet the benefit
provided by the promoters may still, to a substantial degree, be obtained. Often,
the weight ratio of promoter to total solvent and promoter is at least about 0.01:1,
say, at least about 0.1:1, e.g., 0.1:1 to 0.9:1, preferably, about 0.1 : 1 to 0.8:1.
[0039] Deactivated catalyst can often be regenerated by subjecting the catalyst to high
hydrogen partial pressures at elevated temperatures, e.g., at least about 500 psi
(34 bar), say, 600 to 2000 psi (40 to 136 bar), and at least 40°C, say 50° to 150°C,
for 1 to 50 hours.
[0040] In the processes of this invention, the amination of the carbonyl or imino group,
as the case may be, enhances the ability to hydrogenate the nitrile without undue
degradation of the nitrile to evolve hydrogen cyanide. Accordingly, the severity of
the hydrogenation conditions can be increased by elevating temperature and/or providing
a more active hydrogenation catalyst.
[0041] When the temperature is to be increased to conduct the hydrogenation of the nitrile
group, the increase may be effected in any suitable manner. For instance, the temperature
of the reaction medium may be increased in a step-wise fashion between the first reaction
step and the nitrile hydrogenation or the overall reaction may be conducted with gradually
increasing temperature, i.e, with no clear transition between the, say, carbonyl group
amination and the nitrile hydrogenation. As is readily apparent, there need be no
clear process demarcation between the completion of the, say, reductive amination
of the carbonyl group and the initiation of the hydrogenation of the nitrile group.
When increasing reaction severity by raising the temperature, the peak temperature
of the reaction mixture during the nitrile hydrogenation is frequently increased to
at least about 90°C, preferably, at least about 100°C to 200° or 250° C or more. Accordingly,
elevated temperatures can be advantageously used to expedite the nitrile hydrogenation.
Often, the peak reaction temperature during the nitrile hydrogenation is at least
about 10°C, say, at least about 15°C, greater than the average temperature during
the amination of the carbonyl or imine group.
[0042] The pressure during the hydrogenation of the nitrile group need not be excessively
high, although pressures as high as 1500 psig or more may be used if desired. Indeed,
enhancements in reaction selectivity above 500 psig have proven in a number of instances
to be of diminishing return. In some instances, the selectivity at 250 psig is not
unduly less than that at 500 psig. However, if the pressure falls too low, the reaction
rate becomes much slower. Hence, pressures of at least about 50, say, at least about
100, psig are generally desired.
[0043] Hydrogen is present during the hydrogenation of the nitrile groups. The presence
of ammonia during hydrogenation is preferred, especially to enhance selectivity. The
amounts present may be within the ranges described above for the first stage of the
reaction. Advantageously, the reaction medium used for the amination of the carbonyl
or imino groups may be used for the hydrogenation of the nitrile groups.
[0044] The hydrogenation catalyst used for the nitrile hydrogenation may be the same or
different than that used for the first stage. When the catalyst is different, it may
be selected from the group of catalyst described above. In some instances, it may
be desired to use hydrogenation catalyst which is more reactive toward nitriles for
the hydrogenation of the nitrile groups. These more reactive catalysts may contain
one or more of rhodium, nickel, palladium, ruthenium and platinum in elemental or
chemically-combined form. The catalytically active materials may be supported or unsupported.
These more reactive catalysts may be unsuitable for, say, the reductive amination
of the carbonyl group and/or may tend to promote evolution of hydrogen cyanide before
the first stage of reaction is complete. By way of illustration, the first stage reaction
may be conducted in the presence of Raney cobalt catalyst, and then the reaction medium
can be subjected to Raney nickel catalyst to effect the hydrogenation of the nitrile
groups. Many Raney nickel catalysts are generally more severe hydrogenation catalysts
than most Raney cobalt catalysts. Hence, the Raney nickel catalysts would be less
desirable than Raney cobalt for the amination of the carbonyl or imino group, but
would be quite satisfactory for the nitrile hydrogenation. The amount of catalyst
used for the hydrogenation of the nitrile groups is sufficient to effect the hydrogenation
and is often in an amount of at least about 0.01, e.g., at least about 0.1, say, at
least about 5, weight percent of active catalyst based on the weight of the nitrile
within the reactor volume. The preferred amounts of catalyst will, of course, depend
upon the nature of the reactor, the catalyst, economics of the process, and the like.
[0045] When using a different catalyst for the nitrile hydrogenation, the temperature may
be increased, decreased or remain the same as that during the first stage since the
more severe conditions need not include increased temperature. Hence, the temperature
may be in the range of about 10° to 200° or 250° C, often, about 50° to 150°C.
[0046] Clearly, the processes of this invention enable the use of a wide variety of reaction
techniques. For instance, each stage can be conducted in a separate batch operation
using different vessels, but more conveniently, the same vessel may be used. The first
stage may be conducted on a semicontinuous basis and the second stage on a continuous
or semicontinuous basis. In even further embodiments, the reactions are conducted
in a continuous process with the reactants passing from a first reaction chamber in
which the amination of the carbonyl or imino group occurs to a second reaction chamber
at a higher temperature and/or using a different hydrogenation catalyst for the remaining
hydrogenation. Alternatively, the same reaction vessel may be used in the continuous
process with a thermally graded reaction bed and/or a graded catalytic bed.
[0047] One particularly attractive use for the amine compounds of this invention is as precursors
to the corresponding isocyanates. The isocyanates may be prepared by any convenient
technique such as by reaction of the amine moieties with phosgene under isocyanate-forming
conditions. Typical conditions include the use of a phosgene to amine group mole ratio
of at least about 1.01:1, say 1.1:1 to 10:1, wherein the reaction is conducted in
the presence of a substantially inert solvent. The amount of solvent is often in a
weight ratio of solvent to amine of at least about 2:1, say, 5:1 to 30:1. Typical
solvents include aromatic hydrocarbons, chlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons, chlorinated
aliphatic hydrocarbons, etc., such as o-dichlorobenzene. The reaction temperature
is often between about 80° or 100°C to 150°C or more, and the reaction may be conducted
under reduced, ambient or elevated pressure. The phosgenation is conducted for a time
sufficient to effect the desired degree of isocyanate formation, e.g., for at least
about 0.1, say, 0.2 to 10 or more, hours.
[0048] The following examples are provided for further illustration of the invention and
are not in limitation thereof. All parts and percentages of liquids and solids are
by weight and of gases by volume unless otherwise stated.
Examples 1 to 9
[0049] All reactions are performed in 100 ml T316 stainless steel or Hastelloy C-276 Parr,
electrically heated autoclaves equipped with a magnetically driven stirrer driven
at maximum speed. Samples are periodically withdrawn through a decanter tube positioned
about 8 millimeters above the bottom of the reactor. Isophoronenitrile (IPN) is sublimed
before use (78°C, 10⁻⁴ torr). Raney catalysts are washed with water, and then methanol
several times, before storing under methanol. Weights of catalyst reported are solvent-wet
weights. All other materials are used as received.
A. Batch reactions are carried out by charging methanol, catalyst, isophoronenitrile
and a tetrahydronaphthalene internal standard to the autoclave bottom. The bottom
is attached to the autoclave head, along with a stainless steel cylinder filled with
the required amount of ammonia. The entire apparatus is purged of air by briefly evacuating,
and then filling with hydrogen to 50 psig two times. After venting to atmospheric
pressure, the ammonia is added causing a brief exotherm. The reactor is then heated
to the temperature set forth in Table I below, and then immediately pressurized with
hydrogen. Hydrogen uptake is monitored by timing pressure drops. Reaction progress
is monitored by occasionally removing samples via the decanter tube, which are analyzed
by capillary gas chromatography. These samples showed essentially complete conversion
of isophoronenitrile to the aminonitrile intermediate after completion of the first
stage of the reaction. When hydrogen uptake slowed, or after 1 hour at the initial
temperature, the mixture is brought to the final temperature in steps of about 20°C,
holding at these intermediate temperatures for about 30 minutes to 1 hour. Final temperature
is held for about 30 minutes to 2 hours. In example 5, the initial 80°C temperature
is maintained for one hour, an intermediate temperature of 100°C is maintained for
one hour and the final temperature of 120°C is maintained for one hour. In example
6, the initial temperature of 70°C is maintained for 0.5 hour, and the temperature
is thereafter increased at a rate of 5°C per 15 minutes until the final temperature
of 120°C is achieved and the final temperature is maintained for one hour.
B. Semicontinuous process reactions involve the addition of ammonia-pressurized solutions
of isophoronenitrile. Catalyst is charged as a slurry in 15 milliliters of methanol
to the reactor bottom and deoxygenated as described above. The isophoronenitrile is
dissolved in sufficient methanol to make a 40 weight percent solution and charged,
along with the tetrahydronaphthalene internal standard, to a glass, graduated Fischer-Porter
bottle. Ammonia is introduced into this solution via a 1/8" tube inserted to near
the bottom of the Fischer-Porter bottle. All of the ammonia for the reaction is charged
in this way, with none charged to the reactor itself. After achieving the sought pressure
and temperature in the Parr autoclave, the ammonia-pressurized isophoronenitrile solution
is fed into the autoclave during 2 hours using a high pressure pump. Aliquots are
periodically removed to monitor the reaction progress. After complete addition, the
autoclave is brought to the final temperature in 20° increments as before. In example
9, the final temperature of 120°C is maintained for 0.5 hour.
[0050] Examples 1, 2, 3, 4 and 8 are comparative. In examples 1, 2, 3 and 8, no final temperature
increase is effected. The reaction conditions and results are summarized in Table
I.
TABLE I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
temperature (°C) |
% Yield |
Example |
Mode |
Catalyst |
g IPN |
g catalyst |
g NH₃ |
mL MeOH |
psi |
initial |
final |
IPDAa |
bicyclicb |
IPAN1c |
IPAAd |
1* |
batch |
RaCoe |
6.00 |
2.01 |
4.60 |
34 |
1200 |
100 |
100 |
<2% |
<2% |
5% |
<2% |
2* |
batch |
RaCo |
6.03 |
4.02 |
5.03 |
34 |
1475 |
100 |
100 |
89% |
3% |
<1% |
5% |
3* |
batch |
RaCo-Crf |
6.01 |
1.52 |
5.70 |
34 |
1200 |
100 |
100 |
89% |
5% |
1% |
6% |
4* |
batch |
RaCo-Cr |
6.01 |
0.61 |
5.24 |
34 |
1200 |
100 |
100g |
<2% |
<2% |
<2% |
<2% |
5 |
batch |
RaCo-Cr |
6.01 |
0.61 |
4.87 |
34 |
1200 |
80 |
120 |
79% |
6% |
6% |
8% |
6 |
batch |
RaCo-Cr |
6.02 |
1.55 |
5.20 |
34 |
500 |
70 |
120 |
85% |
7% |
3% |
5% |
7 |
batch |
RaCo-Cr |
8.03 |
2.08 |
5.00 |
45 |
250 |
50 |
120 |
69% |
7% |
15% |
2% |
8* |
semi |
RaCo-Cr |
15.02 |
1.54 |
12.38 |
44 |
1200 |
120 |
120 |
<2% |
<2% |
<2% |
<2% |
9 |
semi |
RaCo-Cr |
15.19 |
1.51 |
12.50 |
44 |
1200 |
85 |
120 |
82% |
5% |
8% |
4% |
* comparative |
a isophoronediamine |
b 1,3,3-Trimethyl-6-azabicyclo [3.2.1] octane |
c stereoisomer of 3-cyano-3,5,5-trimethyl-aminocyclohexane which is less reactive |
d 3-cyano-3,5,5-trimethyl cyclohexanol (both cis and trans stereoisomers) |
e Raney cobalt catalyst |
f Raney cobalt catalyst available as Raney 2724 from Davison Chemical Div., W. R. Grace
& Co., Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A. |
g The temperature is then increased to 120°C but no further reaction is perceived. |
Examples 10 to 51
[0051] The reactions are conducted in a 100 milliliter Parr minireactor which is electrically
heated and equipped with a magnetically driven stirrer. In a dry box, 5 grams of dry,
chromium promoted Raney cobalt (available as Raney 2724 from Davison Chemical Div.,
W. R. Grace & Co., Baltimore, Maryland) is placed into the minireactor. The minireactor
is sealed with a rubber stopper and septum and removed from the dry box. Thirty-five
milliliters of the solvent identified in Table II, which solvent has been sparged
with hydrogen, are added to the mini reactor by syringe through the septum. (When
mixtures of solvents are used, the ratios set forth in Table II are by weight.) Then
the stopper is removed for only a time sufficient to add about 12.1 grams of isophoronenitrile
(see Table II) and 0.6 gram of triglyme (triethylene glycol dimethyl ether). The minireactor
is then sealed, purged of air by three pressure/vent cycles with 200 psig hydrogen
and thereafter pressure tested with 500 psig hydrogen for five minutes. The minireactor
is again vented, and 9.9 grams of ammonia are added. The temperature of the reaction
is brought to 60°C and the slurry stirred at moderate speed for one hour. Hydrogen
is then added to raise the pressure to 625 psig and the stirring is increased to the
maximum rate. The time required for the pressure to drop 50 psi is observed and is
reported in Table II. The pressure is increased to 625 psig and the time for the following
50 psig drop is observed and reported in Table II. After 80 minutes, the temperature
is increased in 20°C increments every 20 minutes until 130°C is obtained (1 hour and
10 minutes) and the reactor is then held at 130°C for 1 hour. The reactor is cooled
and the contents analyzed. The results are summarized in Table II.
[0052] As indicated in Table II, several catalysts are used for more than one run. When
the catalyst is used for more than one run, the supernatant liquid is withdrawn, and,
usually, the catalyst is washed several times with 50 milliliter aliquots of the solvent
(which has been sparged with hydrogen) while maintaining the minireactor at about
5 to 10 psig. About 10 milliliters of solvent are retained with the catalyst when
the supernatant liquid is removed. The isophoronenitrile in about 25 milliliters of
solvent which has been saturated with ammonia is added via the septum. The runs are
otherwise essentially conducted as above.
[0053] The results summarized in Table II are normalized to 100% based on the components
reported. In the table, the following terms have the following meanings:
MeOH: methanol
EtOH: ethanol
Amberlyst™ 15: a styrene-divinyl benzene ion exchange resin available from Rohm &
Haas, Philadelphia, PA.
t-BuOH: t-butanol
Me Carbitol™: diethylene glycol monomethylether
THF: tetrahydrofuran
Methyl Propasol™: 1-methoxy-2-propanol
Et glycol: ethylene glycol
Hexylene glycol: 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol
Pr glycol: propylene glycol
1 PrOH: isopropanol
amide: 1-amino-3,5,5-trimethyl-3-cyclohexyl-amide
bicyclic, IPAN1, IPAA: as defined in the previous examples.

Examples 52 to 54
[0054] In each of the examples, a five gram charge of chromium promoted Raney cobalt (Raney
2724) is used in a 100 milliliter Parr minireactor under the substantially same procedures
as set forth for Examples 10 to 51. Methanol is used as the solvent for the reaction.
The isophoronenitrile is introduced into the reactor as set forth in connection with
Examples 10 to 51. The hydrogen (total pressure) is set forth in Table III. Each catalyst
is subjected to a number of sequential runs to ascertain the changes in catalyst performance.
The temperature programming is as set forth for Examples 10 to 51. Between runs, about
25 milliliters of the reaction menstruum are withdrawn from the minireactor, leaving
about 10 milliliters of liquid slurried with the catalyst in the bottom of the reactor.
The catalyst is not washed between runs. A 25 milliliter charge of fresh, make-up
reaction menstruum containing isophoronenitrile is added for the subsequent run. Each
run is about four hours in duration. The examples are summarized in Table III.
TABLE III
Example |
(Run) |
Total Pressure, Psig |
Initial rate (psi H₂/min) |
Comments |
52 |
(1) |
600 |
15.2 |
|
|
(2) |
600 |
9.1 |
|
|
(3) |
600 |
18.8 |
The catalyst is subjected to a regeneration at 800 psig hydrogen at 80°C for 15 hours
between runs 2 and 3. |
|
(4) |
600 |
6.2 |
|
53 |
(1) |
600 |
25.4 |
|
|
(2) |
600 |
less than 2 |
The catalyst is subjected to 200 psig hydrogen at 120°C for 1 hour between runs 1
and 2. |
|
(3) |
600 |
17.7 |
The catalyst is subjected to a regeneration at 800 psig hydrogen at 80°C for 15 hours
between runs 2 and 3. |
54 |
(1) |
1800 |
59.4 |
|
|
(2) |
1800 |
51.3 |
|
|
(3) |
1800 |
44.4 |
|
|
(4) |
1800 |
23.0 |
|
|
(5) |
500 |
10.4 |
|
[0055] The examples indicate that at lower hydrogen partial pressures, the system containing
methanol as the solvent tends to deactivate. At higher hydrogen pressures, as are
typically disclosed in prior processes for the amination of, e.g., isophoronenitrile,
the catalyst in methanol solvent tends to maintain its activity. However, the higher
pressures also tend to result in the production of a greater proportion of the less
desired aminoalcohol product.
Example 55
[0056] A slurry of 4.84 grams of chromium-promoted Raney cobalt (Raney 2724) in water is
charged to a 100 milliliter stainless steel autoclave along with 35 milliliters of
hydrogen-sparged solvent mixture of 85 volume per cent ethanol and 15 volume per cent
isopropanol. The reactor is purged with hydrogen and the mixture stirred for several
minutes. After allowing the catalyst to settle, the solvent is removed via a dip tube
positioned about 7 millimeters above the reactor bottom. About 10 milliliters of solvent
remain in the catalyst slurry. The catalyst is similarly washed with a second 35 milliliter
aliquat of the hydrogen-sparged solvent.
[0057] A solution of 75 grams of isophoronenitrile in 75 milliliters of the ethanol/isopropanol
solvent and the 4 grams of triethylene glycol dimethyl ether internal standard is
charged to an 8 ounce glass pressure bottle containing a stir bar and attached to
a gas manifold. The apparatus is evacuated, heated to 40°C in an oil bath and then
pressurized to 40 psig with ammonia. After stirring under these conditions for 15
hours to form the imine, about 40 volume percent of this mixture is charged into the
100 milliliter autoclave containing the washed Raney cobalt catalyst. The reactor
is heated to 60°C with rapid stirring and then pressurized to 525 psig with hydrogen.
Rates were monitored by timing 50 psi pressure drops; the reactor is repressurized
to 525 psig after each measurement. After 80 minutes under these conditions, the temperature
is increased at a rate of 20°C every 20 minutes to 120°C, then to 130°C after a further
10 minute period. The mixture is further stirred under 500 psig hydrogen for 1 hour.
The product is removed via the dip tube after cooling and allowing the catalyst to
settle. Subsequent runs are conducted the same way, except that the catalyst from
the previous run is reused instead of using fresh catalyst. Table IV summarizes the
results of a run.
Example 56
[0058] A solution of 40.0 grams of isophoronenitrile and 22.01 grams of isophoronediamine
in a mixture of 100 milliliters ethanol and 100 milliliters hexane is refluxed at
ambient pressure to form an imine. Water is removed as the ternary azeotrope using
a Dean-Stark trap. After refluxing for 9 hours (kettle temperature 62°C), azeotrope
evolution ceased. A total of 53 milliliters of a lower azeotrope is collected, which
consisted of 8.3 weight percent (4.4 grams) water by Karl Fisher analysis. The remaining
solvent in the kettle is removed by rotary evaporation to yield 62.0 grams of a viscous
liquid which is redissolved in an 85 volume percent ethanol and 15 volume percent
isopropanol solvent to provide 98 grams of a two-phase solution. The solution is stirred
under 40 psig ammonia at 40°C for 16 hours to yield a light yellow solution (total
ammonia uptake 12.88 grams).
[0059] About 75 volume percent of this mixture is charged to a reactor containing 4.84 grams
of Raney cobalt (Raney 2724) and about 10 milliliters of the final product from Example
55. The reaction procedure described in Example 55 is substantially followed.
[0060] Very few heavy materials that might have been generated by hydrogenation of imine
formed from isophoronenitrile and isophoronediamine are found to be present. The results
are summarized in Table IV.
Table IV
|
|
|
|
|
Weight % Yield |
Example |
Isophorone-Nitrile, Grams |
50 psi Drop 1 (min:sec) |
50 psi Drop 2 (min:sec) |
bicyclic* |
IPAN1* |
IPDA* |
IPAA* |
Amide* |
55 |
30 |
0:00:51 |
0:01:04 |
7.64% |
0.11% |
84.01% |
4.30% |
0.26% |
56 |
30 |
0:30:55 |
0:05:28 |
5.19% |
1.02% |
88.38% |
1.00% |
0.26% |
*as defined in the previous examples |
1. A process for aminating a feed comprising at least one of carbonylnitrile and iminonitrile
in which the nitrile group is less reactive than the carbonyl or imino group, comprising
subjecting said feed in the presence of hydrogen and at least one of ammonia, primary
amine and secondary amine to reductive amination conditions including the presence
of hydrogenation catalyst sufficient to produce the corresponding aminonitrile, said
conditions including a temperature sufficiently low that undue decomposition of the
nitrile portion of the feed is avoided, and subjecting said aminonitrile to hydrogenation
conditions including the presence of hydrogenation catalyst sufficient to hydrogenate
nitrile moieties to produce aminated product, said hydrogenation conditions including
at least one of a temperature higher than the temperature of the reductive amination
conditions to produce the aminonitrile and the presence of hydrogenation catalyst
more reactive toward nitrile groups than the hydrogenation catalyst used to produce
the aminonitrile.
2. The process of claim 1 in which the nitrile has at least one nitrile on a tertiary
carbon atom.
3. The process of claim 1 or 2 which the reaction conditions in both steps comprise
a pressure of less than about 48 bar (g) (700 psig), preferably less than about 34
bar (g) (500 psig).
4. The process of anyone of claims 1 to 3 in which the amination conditions to produce
the corresponding aminonitrile comprise a temperature of less than about 90°C.
5. The process of anyone of claims 1 to 4 in which said hydrogenation conditions comprise
a catalyst more reactive roward nitrile groups than the hydrogenation catalyst used
to produce the aminonitrile, preferably at least one of rhodium, nickel, palladium,
ruthenium and platinum.
6. The process of anyone of claims 1 to 5 in which the hydrogenation conditions to
hydrogenate the aminonitrile comprise a temperature of at least about 100°C.
7. The process of anyone of claims 1 to 6 in which a carbonylnitrile is aminated and
the nitrile moiety is on the beta carbon atom to the carbon atom of the carbonyl or
imino group.
8. The process of anyone of claims 1 to 7 in which a carbonylnitrile is aminated which
is represented by the structural formula

wherein R¹, R², R³ and R⁴ may be the same or different and are hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl,
aryl, alkaryl or aralkyl, wherein at least R¹ and R² are other than hydrogen, and
R⁵ is hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, alkaryl, or aralkyl and may form a cyclic
structure with a carbon atom of one of R¹ and R³, preferably isophoronenitrile, and
the amination is conducted in the presence of ammonia.
9. The process of anyone of claims 1 to 8 in which the catalyst comprises Raney cobalt
catalyst, and preferably also contains at least one of chromium and manganese, especially
chromium.
10. The process of anyone of claims 1 to 9 in which the temperature at the amination
to produce the aminonitrile is less than about 90°C between about 15° and 85°C.
11. The process of anyone of claims 1 to 10 in which the weight ratio of catalyst
to isophoronenitrile is about 0.05:1 to 2:1, and the mole ratio of ammonia to nitrile
moieties in the reductive amination is about 5:1 to 30:1.
12. The process of anyone of claims 1 to 11 in which the catalyst comprises Raney
cobalt catalyst during the production of aminonitrile and comprises Raney nickel catalyst
during the hydrogenation of the nitrile moieties.
13. The process of anyone of claims 1 to 12 wherein the process is conducted in the
presence of dipolar protic amination promoter, which preferably contains more than
one carbon atom and at least one hydroxyl group, and preferably has a molecular weight
of less than 200, and especially comprises at least one of ethylene glycol, 1,2-propylene
glycol, 1,3-propanediol, 1,2-butanediol, 1,3-butanediol, 1,4-butanediol, glycerol,
dietheylene glycol, triethylene glycol, tetraethylene glycol and sorbitol.
14. The process of claim 13 wherein the amination promoter has a molecular weight
of less than 200 and a pKa at 25°C in a 0.4 to 1 weight per cent solution in dimethyl sulfoxide extrapolated
to zero ionization of less than about 35.
15. The process of anyone of claims 1 to 14 wherein a primary amine represented by
the formula RNH₂ wherein R is alkyl, hydroxyl, hydroxyalkyl, aminoalkyl, aryl, hydroxyaryl,
aminoaryl or amino of up to 20 carbon atoms is reacted with the carbonylnitrile to
form an iminonitrile which is reductively aminated.
16. The process of claim 15 wherein the primary amine comprises amine the same as
aminated product of the process.
17. The process of anyone of claims 1 to 16 wherein the hydrogenation catalyst to
produce the aminonitrile is regenerated by contact with a least 34 bar (500 psi) hydrogen
at a temperature of at least 40°C for at least 1 hour while not in contact with carbonylnitrile,
wherein preferably the solvent comprises methanol.