FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] This invention relates to fossil fuel desulfurization, and particularly to coal desulfurization
with enzymes such as oxidases and hydrolases.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Due largely to environmental concerns, there is an increasing need for low-sulfur
emissions from fossil fuels such as coal which contain sulfur. Heretofore, both post-combustion
and pre-combustion desulfurization techniques have been available. For example, flue
gas desulfurization is a well know post-combustion process. However, it is generally
inconvenient, expensive and limited with respect to the amount and types of sulfur
combustion products which can be removed. Flue gas treatment also ignores other economic
impacts from the handling and processing of fuels containing sulfur, such as corrosion
caused by the sulfur in coal to the equipment used to handle the coal. Pre-combustion
processes, on the other hand, which result in low-sulfur fuels, can reduce both sulfur
emissions and equipment corrosion.
[0003] Conventional coal desulfurization processes include physical methods such as pyrite
flotation or magnetic separation. While these physical methods are convenient and
economical, they are capable of removing only inorganic sulfur and generally result
in notable energy losses. On the other hand, chemical coal desulfurization processes,
such as oxidation with ferric salts, chlorine or ozone, or reduction with solvent-hydrogen
mixture, are somewhat more effective in removing organic sulfur, but generally have
numerous disadvantages, such as, corrosion problems from reagents, high energy requirements,
and costly reagent recovery.
[0004] Attempts have also been made to remove sulfur from coal by microbiological methods.
Early interest in this field focused on microorganisms which were naturally suited
for sulfur digestion, such as
Thiobacillus found in mine waters and
Sulfolobus found in sulfur springs, as reported in Detz et al,
American Mining Congress Journal, vol. 65, p. 75 (1979); Kargi et al,
Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 24, pp. 2115-2121 (1982). However, such bacteria utilize only inorganic sulfur
and have no propensity for organic sulfur removal. More recently, efforts have focused
on the adaptation of microorganisms for organic sulfur removal. Such attempts are
reported, for example, in Isbister et al, "Microbial Desulfurization of Coal", in
Attia (ed),
Processing and Utilization of High Sulfur Coal, p. 627 (1985); and Robinson and Finnerty, "Microbial Desulfurization of Fossil Fuels"
(University of Georgia). There are, however, numerous obstacles which must be overcome
before such techniques become practical. For example, optimal growth conditions in
a large scale process are difficult and expensive to maintain, typically requiring
expensive growth factors and excessive nutrients or additives. Such additives themselves
can be a potential environmental concern and possibly as difficult to remove economically
as the sulfur. The growth of the microorganisms can also produce toxic by-products
or compounds which may result in mortality or render the microorganisms incapable
of catabolizing sulfur. In addition, such fermentation processes are usually plagued
with problems such as culture stability, mutation or contamination, reactor upsets,
substrate variation, and the like. Thus, there remains an unfilled need for an economical
and efficient method for desulfurizing coal and other fossil fuels.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] The present invention involves the biochemical treatment of coal and other fossil
fuels to remove sulfur or to desulfurize the fossil fuel. The biochemical treatment
comprises contacting the sulfur-containing fossil fuel with an enzyme or enzymes in
an amount generally effective to reduce the amount of sulfur in the fuel. The enzymes
are added directly to the fossil fuel and need not be produced by microorganisms growing
on the fossil fuel as a substrate or growth medium. Thus, the process need not be
controlled to maintain the viability of any enzyme-producing microorganisms, but can
be optimized to favor enzymatically mediated conversion of the sulfur into a form
that can be separated from the fossil fuel.
[0006] In a broad aspect, the present invention provides a method for desulfurizing a fossil
fuel. The process comprises optionally at least selectively oxidizing organic sulfur
in a fossil fuel, and thereafter contacting the oxidized fossil fuel with a sulfur-removing
enzyme, and recovering the fossil fuel with a reduced sulfur content.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0007]
Fig. 1 is a schematic illustration of an embodiment of the process according to the
present invention;
Fig. 2 is a schematic illustration of an alternate embodiment of the process according
to the present invention;
Fig. 3 is a graphical illustration of spectral data of filtrates of dibenzothiophene
(DBT) treated with a peroxidase and a sulfatase as described in Example 1 hereinbelow;
Fig. 4 is a graphical illustration of spectral data of filtrates of Wyodak coal at
various periods of time following treatment with a peroxidase and a sulfatase, as
described in Example 2 hereinbelow; and
Fig. 5 is a graphical illustration of spectral data of filtrates of Illinois No. 6
coal at various periods of time following treatment with a peroxidase and a sulfatase
as described in Example 3 hereinbelow.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0008] The present invention includes a process for treating fossil fuels, and especially
fossil fuels containing organic sulfur. Contemplated fossil fuels include petroleum
and coal; products of fossil fuel conversion processes, e.g., coal-derived liquids,
are also considered. As used herein, coal includes any coalified organic material
such as peat, lignite, sub-bituminous coal, bituminous coal and anthracitic coal.
The fossil fuel should contain organic sulfur to obtain the most benefit from treatment
according to the present invention, although inorganic sulfur could also be removed
by this process. By organic sulfur is generally meant organic thiophenes, sulfides
and thiols, whereas inorganic sulfur generally refers to sulfates and metallic sulfides
such as pyrite.
[0009] According to the present process, a two-step reaction pathway is generally employed.
Initially, the organic sulfur is converted into a sulfur oxide, e.g., sulfate, by
oxidation. However, in some rare instances oxidation may not be necessary, because
the organic sulfur may be predominantly in the sulfate form or substantially only
the naturally occurring sulfate is to be removed. In this sense, the oxidation can
be considered to be an optional reaction. However, for optimal sulfur removal, oxidation
is preferred. The oxidation substantially converts the organic sulfur into sulfate.
The sulfate is enzymatically removed, for example, by hydrolysis induced by a surfur
hydrolase, e.g., a sulfatase.
[0010] The fossil fuel may be prepared for treatment according to the present method by
generally known methods; e.g., solid fossil fuels, such as coal, can be ground and
slurried in water. The slurry can be prepared by grinding the solid fossil fuel to
an appropriate particle size, typically 10-50 µm, and mixing it with water. For the
purpose of illustration only, the invention is described hereinbelow with reference
to a ground coal slurry with the understanding that other fossil fuels and media may
be analogously employed. For example, in the case of oil, it may be sufficient to
prepare an emulsion if an aqueous enzymatic treatment is employed, or to treat the
oil neat, with a solvent, or in mixture with another immiscible fluid.
[0011] The oxidation of the coal slurry may be effected by treatment with an oxidation enzyme,
such as, a peroxidase, a laccase, or a like oxidase. As used herein, a peroxidase
is any enzyme having the E.C. number 1.11.1.7, e.g., horseradish peroxidase, and a
laccase is any enzyme having E.C. number 1.10.3.2, e.g.,
Pyricularis oxyzae laccase.
[0012] Alternatively, partial oxidation may be effected by mild alkaline or acidic treatment
of the coal particles. For the former case, generally the coal is contacted with 5-10
parts by weight of caustic per 100 parts by weight coal. The contact is for a brief
period at an elevated temperature of 125-200°C, preferably 150-180°C. The exposure
to the elevated temperature is preferably effected by rapid heating to the treatment
temperature, e.g., in less than about three minutes, preferably in less than about
one minute, and most preferably in about thirty seconds. The duration of the coal
alkali contact at the treatment temperature is preferred about 1-10 minutes and especially
preferred about 3-5 minutes. Following the exposure to the elevated temperature, the
coal/alkali mixture is rapidly cooled or quenched to below 100°C, preferably in less
than about three minutes, and most preferably in less than about one minute, i.e.,
about 30 seconds.
[0013] It should also be understood, however, that acidic oxidation at ambient temperature
may be performed instead. This would be done in the conventional oxidative manner
of pretreatment of coal prior to desulfurization as an alternative chemical oxidation
technique.
[0014] The oxidation serves to convert the organic sulfur moieties into sulfur oxide or
moieties, such as sulfate. It is desirable to convert the maximum possible amount
of organic sulfur to sulfur oxides. On the other hand, full oxidation to sulfur dioxide
is generally undesirable, as also is excessive oxidation of the carbon in the coal
matrix. Usually the desired degree of oxidation can be achieved by varying the type
of alkali, oxidase or other oxidant, the oxidant concentration, duration of contact
between the coal and the oxidant, and other conditions of treatment, e.g., pH, temperature,
oxygen availability.
[0015] The hydrolysis of the oxidized sulfur moieties is then effected, as mentioned above,
by sulfatase treatment. As used herein, sulfatase includes any enzyme capable of hydrolyzing
the sulfur moieties to yield a water-soluble sulfur compound. Specific examples include
enzymes having the E.C. number 3.1.6.1, such as limpet sulfatase,
Aerobacter aerogenes sulfatase, abalone entrail sulfatase,
Helix pomatia sulfatase, and the like.
[0016] The coal particles may be treated with the sulfatase and/or oxidation enzymes, with
or without additional chemical oxidation. One contemplated process scheme is a fluidized
bed reactor as illustrated in Fig. 1. Generally, uniform concentration and temperature
are maintained throughout the fluid bed reactor 100, and the enzyme is immobilized
on support particles E which are relatively larger in size than the coal particles
in the slurry typically fed into the lower portion of the reactor 100. This size difference
permits retention of the enzyme support particles E by catalyst retention screen S
and gravity separation in the upper portion of the reactor 100 near the effluent port
C in the conventional manner of fluid bed operation. Air or other suitable gas is
typically supplied to the bottom of the reactor 100 to promote back mixing and CSTR
conditions.
[0017] An alternative processing scheme for a moving bed reactor, which generally follows
the format of the Examples set forth below, is illustrated in Fig. 2. The coal slurry
is introduced from hold-up/preparation tank 200 generally to the upper end of inclined
moving bed 202 and discharged from the lower end thereof. As the coal descends through
the reactor 202, it is continuously contacted with enzyme solution in a countercurrent
fashion to release the sulfur as sulfate which is soluble in the enzyme solution.
The enzyme/sulfate solution effluent from the reactor is recovered by adsorption on
a sorbent in enzyme adsorption unit 204. The sulfate solution is readily separated
from the sorbent and collected in tank 206 in which, for example, lime or other basic
material may be used to precipitate the sulfate prior to disposal. The adsorbed enzyme
from unit 204 is then desorbed in unit 208. The desorbed enzyme is then recycled to
the reactor 202 along with any makeup enzyme, while the sorbent may be recycled through
the enzyme adsorption/desorption cycle.
[0018] The invention is illustrated by way of the examples which follow.
Example 1
[0019] A suspension was prepared of 100 mg dibenzothiophene ("DBT") in 3 ml of 0.1 M Tris
buffer, pH 7.0. To this suspension at room temperature was added 0.5 ml of horseradish
peroxidase (Sigma P 8000) at 2 mg/ml in buffer, and 0.5 ml of
Aerobacter aerogenes sulfatase (Sigma S 1629) at 2 mg/ml in buffer. The mixture was maintained at room
temperature in an air atmosphere, and reaction samples were periodically removed and
filtered. Solids were analyzed for elemental composition and such analyses are presented
in Table 1.
TABLE 1
| |
Elemental Analysis (weight percent) |
| Sample |
C |
H |
N |
O |
S |
| DBT |
78.26 |
4.35 |
0 |
0 |
17.39 |
| DBT/Peroxidase |
77.80 |
4.38 |
0.01 |
1.16 |
16.65 |
| DBT/Peroxidase/Sulfatase |
76.62 |
4.12 |
0.19 |
3.88 |
15.19 |
[0020] Filtrates from the peroxidase/sulfatase treated DBT were analyzed for spectral changes
and such spectral data are presented in Fig. 3. The spectral data demonstrate a spectral
shift in the direction of longer wavelengths indicative of increased polarity which
would be expected from conversion of DBT by the peroxidase/sulfatase enzymes. The
elemental analysis demonstrates an increase in oxygen content and a decrease in sulfur
content. Moreover, it was also observed that starting reaction mixtures were distinctly
two-phase liquid-solid mixtures whereas later reaction mixtures were strongly wetted
and appeared as milky suspensions.
Example 2
[0021] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated using 100 mg ball-milled Wyodak coal instead
of DBT. The results are presented in Table 2 and Fig. 4.
TABLE 2
| |
|
Elemental Analysis (weight percent) |
| Sample |
Hours |
C |
H |
N |
S |
| Wyodak Coal |
-- |
65.96 |
4.57 |
0.95 |
1.70 |
| Wyodak Coal/Peroxidase/Sulfatase |
1 |
59.47 |
4.99 |
0.98 |
0.90 |
| Wyodak Coal/Peroxidase/Sulfatase |
2 |
60.42 |
5.12 |
1.15 |
0.79 |
| Wyodak Coal/Peroxidase/Sulfatase |
4 |
58.84 |
5.04 |
1.08 |
0.95 |
| Wyodak Coal/Peroxidase/Sulfatase |
24 |
60.35 |
5.30 |
1.22 |
0.30 |
[0022] The spectral changes demonstrated in Fig. 4 for Wyodak coal are similar to, although
more pronounced than those observed with DBT, indicating more extensive reacting of
the Wyodak coal than the DBT, in the presence of the peroxidase and sulfatase.
[0023] The large drop in sulfur percentage by elemental analysis seen in the data in Table
2 indicates that about 80% of the sulfur was removed. It is believed that the results
with the Wyodak coal are better than with DBT because only a fraction of the organic
sulfur in coal is aromatic, thiophene-type sulfur which is generally more recalcitrant
to chemical conversion than other types of organic sulfur found in coal. The increase
in nitrogen percentage is probably due to adherence of the enzymes to the coal particles.
Example 3
[0024] The procedure of Example 2 was repeated using Illinois No. 6 coal instead of Wyodak
coal. The results are presented in Table 3 and Fig. 5.
TABLE 3
| |
|
Elemental Analysis (weight percent) |
| Sample |
Hours |
C |
H |
N |
S |
| Illinois No. 6 Coal |
0 |
70.39 |
4.48 |
1.44 |
3.60 |
| Illinois No. 6 Coal/Peroxidase/Sulfatase |
1 |
58.72 |
5.01 |
0.94 |
0.91 |
| Illinois No. 6 Coal/Peroxidase/Sulfatase |
2 |
58.56 |
5.00 |
1.14 |
0.98 |
| Illinois No. 6 Coal/Peroxidase/Sulfatase |
4 |
58.36 |
5.07 |
1.22 |
1.72 |
| Illinois No. 6 Coal/Peroxidase/Sulfatase |
24 |
58.27 |
5.14 |
1.21 |
0.84 |
[0025] As seen from Table 3 and Fig. 5, the enzyme-mediated treatment of Illinois No. 6
coal desulfurizes the coal in a manner similar to the Wyodak coal.
[0026] The foregoing disclosure and description of the invention are illustrative and explanatory
thereof, and various changes in the size, shape and materials, as well as in the details
of the illustrated construction may be made without departing from the spirit of the
invention.
1. A method for desulfurizing fossil fuel from a fossil fuel substrate containing
organic sulfur, comprising the steps of:
contacting the substrate with a sulfur-removing enzyme; and
recovering a fossil fuel having a reduced sulfur content from the substrate.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the substrate includes coal or petroleum, or process-derived
products thereof.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the organic sulfur is thiophene, sulfide, thiol
or a combination thereof.
4. The method of claim 1, further including the step of:
oxidizing the fossil fuel substrate prior to said step of contacting the substrate.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein step of oxidizing includes contacting the substrate
with alkali.
6. The method of claim 4, wherein step of oxidizing includes contacting the substrate
with acid.
7. The method of claim 4, wherein said step of oxidizing includes contacting the substrate
with an oxidation enzyme.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the contact with oxidation and sulfur-removing enzymes
is consecutive.
9. The method of claim 7, wherein the contact with the oxidation and sulfur-removing
enzymes is concurrent.
10. The method of claim 7, wherein the enzymes are immobilized on packing during said
step of contacting with the oxidation and sulfur-removing enzymes.
11. The method of claim 7, wherein the oxidation enzyme is peroxidase or laccase.
12. The method of claim 7, wherein the oxidation enzyme is horseradish peroxidase.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the horseradish peroxidase contact in the presence
of excess oxygen at a temperature from 0 to 80°C and a pH of from 5 to 9, and with
an amount of the peroxidase ranging from about 0.01 to 10 parts by weight per 100
parts by weight of substrate.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the sulfur-removing enzyme is sulfatase.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the sulfatase is selected from the group consisting
of: Aerobacter species sulfatase, limpet sulfatase, abalone entrail sulfatase, and Helix species sulfatase.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the hydrolase is Aerobacter aerogenes arylsulfatase.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein the sulfur-removing enzyme contact is in the presence
of excess water at a temperature from 0 to 80°C and a pH of from 5 to 9, and with
an amount of the arylsulfatase ranging from about 0.01 to about 10 parts by weight
per 100 parts by weight of substrate.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein the sulfur-removing enzyme contact is in the presence
of from about .1 to about one parts by weight of water per 100 parts of weight of
the substrate.
19. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:
separating soluble sulfate from the reduced sulfur content substrate by filtration,
centrifugation or ion exchange adsorption.