[0001] This invention relates to negative-acting silver halide photographic materials and
in particular to photographic elements comprising Group VIII metal doped silver halide
emulsions associated with a speed and contrast promoting agent which are suitable
for use in the photolithographic printing industry and for the development of daylight
handleable contact film.
[0002] Photosensitive silver halide materials are commonly used in the photolithographic
industry to obtain half tone, dot or line, high contrast images.
[0003] To increase the contrast of lithographic films it is common practice to dope the
silver halide emulsions with contrast promoting agents, among which are the water
soluble Group VIII metal salts, such as the trivalent salts of rhodium, ruthenium
and iridium. It is known that good results as regards high covering power (which is
the ratio between the maximum density obtained after development and the silver halide
coverage) and rapid developability (for productivity increase) can be obtained by
using fine grained (less than 0.15 µm) and high chloride content silver halide emulsions.
It is known that such emulsions which contain a Group VIII metal as a contrast promoting
agent may still not have the required contrast, and as the dopant desensitises the
emulsion, it may not have the required speed.
[0004] One approach to the development of a daylight handleable contact film has been to
modify existing daylight duplicating film. Contact films are negative acting materials
which are exposed in contact with an original to record a negative image of the original.
Duplicating films are positive acting materials which are exposed in contact with
an original to produce an identical copy. To produce a duplicating film, the emulsion
is chemically fogged, a metal dopant such as rhodium being required for the reversal
process as well as for desensitising purposes. For a contact film, the unfogged duplicating
emulsion is far too slow for practical use, primarily due to the level of dopant.
As stated previously it is advantageous to have the dopant present for contrast enhancement
purposes but to increase the speed and also contrast to usable levels a sensitisation
step must be introduced. Conventional gold and sulphur sensitisation does confer some
extra speed and contrast but European Patent Applications Nos. 267598 and 138200 and
British Patent Applications Nos. 2202341 and 2206700 disclose negative-acting rhodium
doped emulsions in which the contrast is enhanced by addition of a hydrazine derivative.
Such materials are generally too sensitive to be daylight-handleable, and if this
property is required, a desensitiser must be added. Various examples of the latter
are disclosed, including 2-mercaptobenzimidazole derivatives.
[0005] British Patent No. 741228 discloses the use of 4-substituted 3-amino-5-mercapto-4,1,2-triazoles
of general formula (I)

in which:
R represents other than H,
in photographic constructions. The compounds of formula (I) are said to restrain the
formation of chemical fog without seriously affecting the speed, contrast or other
properties of the emulsion.
[0006] British Patent No. 2573027 discloses the use of compounds of general formulae (II)
and (III)

in which:
X represents O or S,
Y represents O, S or NH, and,
D represents substituted or unsubstituted carbon atoms to complete a 6 membered ring,
in a photographic construction as anti-bronzing agents. However, within the patent
there is no mention of doping of the emulsions.
[0007] U.S. Patent No. 1,725,934 discloses the use of thiazole derivatives in silver halide
constructions, but as an anti-fogging agent.
[0008] The combination of a triazole (IVa) and tetrazaindene (IVb) is known in the photographic
art to act as a stabiliser.

It has now been found that certain groups of compounds, some of which have previously
been used as desensitisers, antifoggants, anti-bronzing agents or stabilisers, have
a particular utility as speed and contrast promoting agents in Group VIII metal doped,
negative-acting silver halide emulsions, the emulsions being chemically-sensitised
or otherwise, and being free from contrast-promoting amounts of hydrazine derivatives.
[0009] According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a photographic
element comprising a Group VIII metal doped negative-acting silver halide emulsion
characterised in that the emulsion is associated with one or more speed and contrast
promoting agents comprising a compound having a nucleus of one of the following general
formulae (i) to (iv)

in which:
Each R¹ independently represents a hydrogen atom or an alkyl group of 1 to 5 carbon
atoms, optionally having one or more substituents selected from hydroxyl moieties,
carboxyl moieties, alkoxy carbonyl groups of 1 to 5 carbon atoms, cyano moieties,
halogen atoms, nitro moieties, amino moieties and aryl groups of up to 10 carbon atoms,
wherein the aryl group may be optionally substituted with one or more substituents
selected from alkyl groups of 1 to 5 carbon atoms, hydroxyl moieties, carboxyl moieties,
alkoxy carbonyl groups of 1 to 5 carbon atoms, cyano moieties, halogen atoms, nitro
moieties and amino moieties,
X¹ represents N or CR⁵, where R⁵ represents R¹ (as defined above) or NO₂,
R² represents a hydrogen atom or SR¹ (R¹ is as defined above) but if X¹ is N then
R² is SR¹,
Q represents S or NR¹, in which R¹ is as defined above,
R³ represents an amino group or SR¹ in which R¹ is as defined above, and,
Each R⁴ independently represents R¹ as defined above or a halogen atom, a nitro moiety,
a cyano moiety, or an alkoxycarbonyl group of 1 to 5 carbon atoms,
the emulsions being free from contrast-promoting amounts of hydrazine derivatives.
R¹ is preferably a hydrogen atom or a methyl group,
R² is preferably a hydrogen atom or SH,
X¹ is preferably N, -CH, -CCH₃ or -CNO₂,
R³ is preferably SH, SCH₃ or NH₂, and,
R⁴ is preferably hydrogen.
[0010] The invention provides a negative-acting photosensitive silver halide material which
may be used to obtain black and white half tone, line or dot images for photolithographic
purposes. The element preferably comprises a support, having one or more hydrophilic
colloidal layers located thereon, in which at least one layer comprises a fine grain,
high chloride content and Group VIII metal doped photographic emulsion associated
with one or more speed and contrast promoting agents selected from compounds of general
formulae (i) to (iv).
[0011] The speed and contrast promoting agents need not be present in the emulsion during
imaging, but must be associated with the emulsion during development. Thus, the compounds
of general formulae (i) to (iv) may be introduced in to the emulsion from a treatment
bath or the developer solution. The compounds may be present in the photographic element
during imaging and optionally additional compounds present in the developer solution.
[0012] Examples of compounds suitable for inclusion as speed or contrast promoting agents
are:

[0013] Preferably the fine grain, high chloride content and Group VIII metal doped photographic
emulsion is associated with one or more speed and contrast promoting agents selected
from compounds A to E.
[0014] Conventional sulphur and gold sensitisation is known to confer some extra speed and
contrast on these high chloride content rhodium doped photographic emulsions but compounds
selected from general formulae (i) to (iv) yield greater speed and contrast increases
than conventional sensitisation methods and can be used in combination with or without
a chemical sensitisation step.
[0015] After image wise exposure of the fine grain, high chloride content rhodium doped
silver halide emulsion, the material undergoes a photographic processing step comprising
an alkaline developing solution wherein the speed and contrast promoting agent is
reactively associated with the emulsion. In a further embodiment it is also possible
to introduce the speed and contrast promoting agent in the developer solution followed
by conventional washing or fixing but it is preferred that the agents are introduced
as a precoating addition.
[0016] The term fine grain is used in the context of the present invention to refer to silver
halide grains having an average grain size of not more than 0.2 µm. High chloride
content refers to the emulsion having at least 60% and preferably at least 80% of
its total halide molar content consisting of chloride ions. The emulsion is preferably
a chlorobromide emulsion wherein the remainder of the halide content comprises bromide
ions and a most preferred emulsion comprises 84% silver chloride : 16% silver bromide
having a mean silver halide grain size of 0.09µm.
[0017] The term Group VIII metal doped refers to the process whereby during precipitation
or physical ripening of the silver halide emulsion, salts of one or more Group VIII
metals, e.g., trisodium hexachlororhodate (III), disodium pentachlororuthenate (III)
and tripotassium hexachloroiridate (III) are present in the solution. The preferred
dopants are water-soluble trivalent salts of rhodium. The speed and contrast increasing
effect of the compounds of general formulae (i) to (iv) is directly proportional to
the level of dopant. The level of doping may be from 10⁻⁶ to 10⁻² moles Group VIII
metal salt per mole of silver but preferably is from 10⁻⁴ to 10⁻² moles Group VIII
metal salt per mole of silver and most preferably from 10⁻³ to 10⁻² mole Group VIII
metal salt per mole of silver.
[0018] The amount of the speed and contrast promoting agent added is in the range 10⁻⁴ to
10⁻¹ mole of agent per mole of silver halide but preferably in the range 10⁻² to 5
x 10⁻² mole of agent per mole of silver halide.
[0019] The invention will now be described with reference to the following Examples:
EXAMPLE 1
Preparation of a Rhodium Doped Silver Halide Emulsion
[0020] A silver halide emulsion of 84 mole % chloride and 16 mole % bromide was prepared
by the simultaneous addition under constant agitation of water solution B and water
Solution C by the double jet technique over a period of 25 minutes to water gelatin
Solution A. The compositions A to C were:
Solution A |
Water |
833.3g |
Gelatin |
25g |
Polyvinylpyrrolidone (K-30) |
6.33g |
KBr |
0.167ml (1N) |
Solution B |
Water |
368g |
AgNO3 |
170g |
Solution C |
Water |
361.3g |
KCl |
62.65g (0.84 moles) |
KBr |
19.04g (0.16 moles) |
Na₃RhCl₆.12H₂O |
0.200g |
[0021] The water gelatin Solution A was kept at a constant temperature of 40°C. Solution
B was added at a constant addition rate whilst the addition rate of Solution C was
varied to maintain the potential of the emulsion thus formed at a value of 120 ± 5mV
(as measured with a specific electrode for Br ions and a reference electrode of the
saturated Ag/AgC1 type). The emulsion so prepared, following the removal of soluble
salts by the conventional coagulation method, had a mean grain diameter of 0.09µm.
The emulsion was then chemically sensitised with sodium gold chloride and sodium thiosulphate.
At the end of the chemical sensitisation a speed and contrast promoting agent selected
from compounds A to J in a suitable solvent was added to the emulsion before preparation
for coating with the addition of additional gelatin, coating surface active agents
and formaldehyde hardener.
[0022] The emulsion was coated at a silver coating weight of 2.7g Ag/m² onto a polyester
support base which was backed with a red antihalation layer.
[0023] The resulting films were exposed through a 0-2, 20cm continuous wedge. The exposing
lamp was a Violux 1500S UV lamp at a distance of 52 inches from the film plane. The
exposed films were developed in 3M RDC
TM developer for 20 seconds @ 40°C and fixed in 3M Fix Roll
TM Fixer.
[0024] The sensitometric data obtained from silver halide coatings made with compounds A
to F are illustrated in Table 1 below.
TABLE 1
Sensitometric Data for Films Containing Representative Examples |
Compound |
Added Amount of Compound (mole/mole AgX) ** |
Relative Speed (Log E) |
DMAX |
Contrast Θ |
Exposure* |
|
|
|
|
A |
C |
|
None |
- |
- |
0.11 |
- |
- |
200 |
None |
- |
-4.43 |
1.26 |
0.4 |
- |
2000 |
A |
10⁻² |
-3.46 |
5.1 |
1.5 |
6.0 |
200 |
B |
2.5x10⁻³ |
-3.52 |
5.2 |
1.23 |
6.5 |
200 |
C |
10⁻² |
-3.53 |
3.6 |
1.27 |
5.4 |
200 |
D |
10⁻² |
-3.50 |
4.2 |
1.35 |
5.4 |
200 |
E |
10⁻² |
-3.60 |
5.3 |
1.44 |
6.5 |
200 |
F |
10⁻² |
-3.78 |
2.8 |
0.95 |
2.8 |
200 |
* Exposure on a Violux UV lamp (as described previously) |
** Generally the amount added to give maximum effect is listed. |
Contrast A is measured between densities 0.07 and 0.17 above Dmin. |
Contrast C is measured between densities 0.5 and 2.5 above Dmin. |
[0025] Each of compounds A to F were dissolved in an appropriate solvent and added at varying
levels as a precoating addition to the emulsion. The emulsion used had the composition
described previously and had been chemically sensitised with conventional sulphur
and gold compounds. When no speed and contrast enhancing compound is added and with
conventional exposure and processing the film shows little development, only on extremely
long exposures to UV light does any density build up. However, when the compounds
of the invention are added, then a dramatic speed and contrast increase is seen.
EXAMPLE 2
Effect of Varying the Halide Ratio of the Emulsion
[0026] An alternative to the emulsion composition described in Example 1 was tested with
Compound A. The emulsion was made following the protocol described previously except
the halide ratio was altered from 84 : 16 chloride to bromide to 96 : 4. Very similar
results were observed with increases in both speed and contrast.
EXAMPLE 3
Effect of Compound A as a Developer Addition
[0027] Some digested emulsion (composition as per Example 1) was coated in the standard
fashion with no addition of any of the speed or contrast promoting agents. The film
was given the standard exposure and processed in RDC developer having some of compound
A added. Washing and fixing were carried out in a conventional fashion.
[0028] At high levels of A, boosts in speed and contrast were observed but greater effects
were noticed when A was added as a precoating addition.
EXAMPLE 4
Effect of Varying the Rhodium Dopant
Level in the Emulsion
[0029] To investigate whether the effect of the compounds of the present invention was also
a function of the rhodium dopant level in the emulsion the following emulsions were
made and coated as described below:
Emulsion 1 as detailed previously for Example 1.
Emulsion 2 exactly the same as Emulsion 1 except 0.0421g of Na₃RhC1₆.12H₂O was used. Emulsion 3 exactly the same as Emulsion 1 except 4.21x10⁻³g of Na₃RhCl₆.12H₂O was used.
Emulsion 4 exactly the same as Emulsion 1 except that no rhodium was used.
[0030] The exposure was varied depending on the speed of the coated emulsions. The greater
the level of rhodium, the slower the film is and hence, a greater exposure period
is required. Emulsion 4 was found to be too fast to be exposed by the Violux UV lamp
so exposure was conducted with a quartz lamp.
[0031] For each emulsion, four coatings were made as described in Table 2.
TABLE 2
Coating Design |
Chemically Digested |
Compound A* |
I |
No |
No |
II |
Yes |
No |
III |
No |
Yes |
IV |
Yes |
Yes |
*400ml per mole of a 0.325% solution of Compound A. |
[0032] The following Tables show the increase in speed (measured at a density of 1), toe
and shoulder contrast (measured between 0.07 and 0.17 and 0.5 and 2.5 above Dmin respectively)
that occurred on addition of Compound A for undigested and chemically sensitised emulsions
(i.e. sulphur and gold sensitised).
TABLE 3
Increase in speed (logE) on addition of Compound A |
|
Chemical Sensitisation |
Emulsion |
No |
Yes |
1 |
* |
+ 0.78 highest level of rhodium |
2 |
* |
+ 0.55 |
3 |
+0.8 |
+ 0.5 |
4 |
+0.07 |
+ 0.4 no rhodium |
*In these cases the coatings of the undigested emulsion with no Compound A were too
slow to be measured using the same exposure level. For emulsion 1 the speed increase
is estimated to be > 2logE for the undigested emulsion. |
TABLE 4
Increase in toe contrast (OA) on addition of Compound A |
|
Chemical Sensitisation |
Emulsion |
No |
Yes |
1 |
* |
+2.0 |
2 |
* |
+1.1 |
3 |
+0.7 |
+0.5 |
4 |
+0.15 |
+0.14 |
TABLE 5
Increase in shoulder contrast (OC) on addition of Compound A |
|
Chemical Sensitisation |
Emulsion |
No |
Yes |
1 |
* |
+9.8 |
2 |
* |
+6.0 |
3 |
+2.9 |
+3.2 |
4 |
+0.6 |
+0.6 |
TABLE 6
Increase in speed (logE) on Chemical Sensitisation |
|
Compound A |
Emulsion |
None |
Added as a precoating final |
1 |
- |
+0.2 |
2 |
- |
+0.2 |
3 |
+0.6 |
+0.3 |
4 |
+0.4 |
+0.72 |
[0033] From Tables 3 - 6 it can be seen that the addition of Compound A causes a large increase
in speed to both undigested and chemically sensitised emulsions. The effect is greater
for the undigested emulsion and for emulsions containing the higher levels of rhodium
dopant.
[0034] The same observations hold for the toe and shoulder contrasts (Table 4 and Table
5 respectively).
[0035] Table 6 shows the increase in speed (logE) observed on chemical sensitisation when
Compound A is added as a precoating addition or not added at all. It can be seen that
with no Compound A present, digestion gives a greater increase in speed with increasing
levels of rhodium dopant, when Compound A is added as a final the effect of chemical
sensitisation decreases with increasing rhodium dopant level i.e. at higher rhodium
levels most of the speed increase comes from the addition of Compound A, the digestion
step only gives a small further speed increase.
EXAMPLE 5
Effect of various Group VIII dopants
[0036] An emulsion similar to that in Example 1 was prepared except that the halide ratio
was adjusted so that it was 96 mole % chloride 4% bromide emulsion. Seven emulsions
were prepared with the following levels of Group VIII transition metal dopants.
Emulsion 1 no dopant.
Emulsion 2 Na₃RhC1₆12H₂O 0.014g per mole of silver.
Emulsion 3 Na₃RhC1₆12H₂O 0.14g per mole of silver.
Emulsion 4 Na₂[RuC1₅(H₂O)] 0.0093g per mole of silver.
Emulsion 5 Na₂[RuC1₅(H₂O)] 0.093g per mole of silver.
Emulsion 6 K₃IrCl₆ 0.013g per mole of silver.
Emulsion 7 K₃IrCl₆ 0.13g per mole of silver.
[0037] Once prepared the emulsion was washed and chemically sensitised in the same way as
in Example 1. Compound A was then added at a level of 1.95g per mole of silver. The
emulsion was then coated onto clear subbed polyester with the conventional coating
aids and hardeners at a coating weight of 2.5g Ag/m².
[0038] The resulting films were exposed through a 0-4 10cm continuous wedge. The exposing
source was a Thiemer Spektra Proof Daylight containing a 1KW Th1007 polymer bulb.
The exposed films were developed in 3M RDC developer for 30 seconds at 35°C and fixed
in 3M Fix Roll fixer.
[0039] The sensitometric data obtained are given in Table 7. Two different coatings of each
emulsion were made using the following design:
Type |
Chemical Sensitisation |
Compound A |
i) |
yes |
absent |
ii) |
yes |
present |
TABLE 7
Emulsion |
Type |
Rel. speed/log E |
Maximum Density |
Contrast |
Exposure/Units |
1 |
i) |
3.1 |
4.2 |
4.5 |
1 |
ii) |
3.2 |
4.2 |
5.3 |
1 |
2 |
i) |
1.9 |
4.4 |
4.6 |
4 |
ii) |
2.2 |
4.4 |
12.2 |
4 |
3 |
i) |
.3 |
1.3 |
- |
4 |
ii) |
.9 |
4.2 |
9.3 |
4 |
4 |
i) |
2.6 |
2.7 |
0.7 |
4 |
ii) |
2.9 |
4.2 |
5.6 |
4 |
5 |
i) |
1.2 |
1.3 |
- |
4 |
ii) |
1.4 |
4.2 |
2.4 |
4 |
6 |
i) |
2.6 |
4.4 |
4.8 |
4 |
ii) |
2.7 |
4.4 |
6.7 |
4 |
7 |
i) |
1.8 |
3.4* |
4.8 |
4 |
ii) |
2.1 |
4.3 |
6.7 |
4 |
* Strong solarisation noticed. Speed measured at 1.00 above fog. Contrast measured
between 0.5 and 2.5 above fog. |
[0040] Comparison of the results for the rhodium doped Emulsions 2 and 3 with the undoped
Emulsion 1 show the significant effect of Compound A. Improvements in speed and contrast
are obtained, the magnitude of the improvement related directly to the level of rhodium
dopant. A large increase in maximum density is also observed for Emulsion 3. They
also show the overall desensitisation effect of rhodium.
[0041] For the ruthenium doped Emulsions 4 and 5 improvements in speed and, especially,
contrast and maximum density are again obtained on addition of Compound A. Emulsions
6 and 7 show the effect of iridium doping. There is an overall desensitisation related
to the level of dopant (see li) 6i) and 7i). On addition of Compound A speed, contrast
and for the heavily doped emulsion maximum density are increased. For Emulsion 7 solarisation
is also observed which is eliminated on addition of Compound A.
1. A photographic element comprising a Group VIII metal doped negative-acting silver
halide emulsion characterised in that the emulsion is associated with one or more
speed and contrast promoting agents comprising a compound having a nucleus of one
of the following general formulae: (i) to (iv)

in which:
Each R¹ independently represents a hydrogen atom or an alkyl group of 1 to 5 carbon
atoms, optionally having one or more substituents selected from hydroxyl moieties,
carboxyl moieties, alkoxy carbonyl groups of 1 to 5 carbon atoms, cyano moieties,
halogen atoms, nitro moieties, amino moieties and aryl groups of up to 10 carbon atoms,
wherein the aryl group may be optionally substituted with one or more substituents
selected from alkyl groups of 1 to 5 carbon atoms, hydroxyl moieties, carboxyl moieties,
alkoxy carbonyl groups of 1 to 5 carbon atoms, cyano moieties, halogen atoms, nitro
moieties and amino moieties,
X¹ represents N or CR⁴, where R⁴ represents R¹ (as defined above) or NO₂,
R² represents a hydrogen atom or SR¹ (R¹ is as defined above) but if X¹ is N then
R² is SR¹,
Q represents S or NR¹ in which R¹ is as defined above,
R³ represents an amino group or SR¹ in which R¹ is as defined above, and,
Each R⁴ independently represents R¹ as defined above or a halogen atom, a nitro moiety,
a cyano moiety, or an alkoxycarbonyl group of 1 to 5 carbon atoms, the emulsion being
free from contrast-promoting amounts of hydrazine derivatives.
2. A photographic element as claimed in Claim 1 characterised in that the Group VIII
metal dopant is rhodium.
3. A photographic element as claimed in Claim 1 or Claim 2 characterised in that the
speed and contrast promoting agent is a compound selected from:
4. A photographic element as claimed in any preceding claim characterised in that
the silver halide emulsion comprises a support upon which is coated one or more hydrophilic
colloidal layers in which at least one layer comprises a fine grain silver halide
emulsion having an average grain size of not more than 0.2µm.
5. A photographic element as claimed in Claim 4 characterised in that the silver halide
emulsion comprises a chlorobromide emulsion in which silver chloride comprises at
least 60% of the total silver halide content.
6. A photographic element as claimed in any preceding claim characterised in that
the speed and contrast promoting agent has a concentration of 10⁻⁴ to 10⁻¹ moles per
mole of silver halide.
7. A photographic element as claimed in any preceding Claim characterised in that
the concentration of Group VIII metal dopant is from 10⁻⁵ to 10⁻² moles dopant per
mole of silver halide.
8. A photographic element as claimed in any preceding claim characterised in that
the dopant comprises a water soluble trivalent rhodium salt.
9. A photographic element as claimed in any preceding Claim characterised in that
the silver halide emulsion is sulphur and gold sensitised.
10. A photographic process which comprises image wise exposing a photographic element
comprising a Group VIII metal doped negative acting silver halide emulsion free from
contrast-promoting amounts of hydrazine, developing and fixing said exposed element
characterised in that one or more speed and contrast promoting agents is associated
with the emulsion during development, said agent being selected from compounds having
a nucleus of one of the general formulae:

in which:
R¹ to R⁴, X¹ and Q are as defined in Claim 1.
11. A photographic process as claimed in Claim 10 characterised in that the speed
and contrast promoting agent:
(i) is present in the emulsion prior to exposure, and/or,
(ii) is introduced into the emulsion after exposure, and/or,
(iii) is present in the developer solution.
12. A developing solution for a photographic element characterised in that the developing
solution comprises one or more speed and contrast promoting agents of formula:

in which:
R¹ to R⁴, X¹ and Q are as defined in Claim 1.