[0001] THE PRESENT INVENTION relates to optical sorting apparatus and methods for sorting
individual objects such as beans, nuts, seeds or other agricultural products to detect
optically discernible defects in the objects.
[0002] Presently, various apparatus exist for carrying out optical sorting of objects. Generally,
these apparatus include a feeding device which separates a quantity of objects into
individual streams of moving objects. The object streams pass through viewing zones
where the individual objects are illuminated. Light reflected from each of the illuminated
objects is collected by one or more photo-amplifiers and analyzed to determine if
the object is acceptable.
[0003] When sorting is based on color, at least two photo-amplifiers are typically provided.
Each photo-amplifier responds to a region of the light frequency spectrum. The photo-amplifiers
produce electric signals which are proportional to the intensity of the light detected.
The electric signals are processed by an electronic circuit which determines whether
a given object is acceptable based on its electric signal. The electronic circuit
activates a rejection mechanism that separates an unacceptable object from the object
stream when the unacceptable object is detected.
[0004] A number of problems and disadvantages exist with known sorting apparatus. Typically
they use painted backgrounds as colour references for optically sorting objects. For
example, a photo-amplifier concurrently receives light reflected from an object being
viewed and a painted background with the same color as an acceptable object of the
type being viewed. If the light reflected from the object being viewed does not closely
match the light reflected from the painted background with the same color as an acceptable
object of that type, the electric signal produced is analyzed as unacceptable and
the object is rejected.
[0005] The color reference provided by a painted background must typically match the acceptable
color as predetermined for a particular type of object to within a 1 to 1.5% tolerance.
Consequently, numerous backgrounds are necessary given the wide variation in colors
for different types of objects. For example, when known sorting devices are used to
sort peanuts and then coffee beans a change of painted backgrounds is required. Likewise,
to switch from sorting one grade of coffee bean to another a change of backgrounds
is required. Further, determining the appropriate color reference for a particular
type of object may require extensive research.
[0006] Painted backgrounds in known sorting apparatus deteriorate and get dirty thereby
causing problems. The color of a deteriorated or dirty background frequently does
not match the color reference for acceptable objects that it was designed to match.
Consequently, when acceptable objects are optically compared to deteriorated or dirty
backgrounds the acceptable objects may be rejected.
[0007] To overcome these problems arising from the use of painted backgrounds it has been
proposed - see for instance EP-A-0 146 299 and EP-A-0 233 466 - to employ backgrounds
illuminated by light derived from sources of different spectral composition, mixed
to provide the required background colour.
[0008] Viewing heads for known optical sorting apparatus are relatively bulky for the viewing
area they provide. For example, a viewing head with a 30 cm outside diameter may provide
only a 5 cm viewing zone. The diameter disparity is necessary to allow the viewing
head to accommodate lamps for illuminating the viewing zone as well as space intensive
equipment such as lenses, photo-amplifiers and filters. Lamps used in known viewing
heads also generate a substantial amount of heat which affects response characteristics
of the photo-amplifiers and causes deterioration of the backgrounds. The amount and
proximity of equipment provided in known viewing heads creates additional problems
such as limiting the number of viewing channels available due to a lack of space,
and causing electrical interference in the photo-amplifier circuits due to the lamp
power-circuits.
[0009] These particular problems are overcome in the proposal of EP-A-0 223 446, which provides
separation of the light sources and/or the detecting means from the viewing zone by
the use of optical fibres to carry light to and/or from the viewing zone.
[0010] Known optical sorting apparatus also have the problem of rejecting an acceptable
object when defects are detected in the proximate end of a nearby, unacceptable object.
This problem typically occurs in two ways. First, imprecision in the timing mechanism
may cause the rejection of an acceptable object passing through the viewing zone either
immediately before, or after, the defective object. Second, known viewing mechanisms
may associate a defect at either end of an unacceptable object with both the unacceptable
object and an acceptable object passing through the viewing zone either immediately
before, or after, the unacceptable object. These problems particularly occur when
the objects being sorted are bunched together in the product stream - i.e., when the
spacing between objects is small.
[0011] Faulty alignment of viewing heads and viewing assemblies in known sorting apparatus
also leads to incorrect sorting operations. Two forms of alignment are necessary for
proper sorting. First, the viewing head is aligned with respect to the object stream.
This may need to be done on a regular basis, particularly when the device is used
to sort a wide range of objects. Second, each viewing assembly is separately adjusted
with respect to the viewing head and object stream. The viewing assemblies ideally
are adjusted to form a flat circle around the object stream. This insures that all
views are synchronized, resulting in actuation of the rejection mechanism at substantially
the same time regardless of which viewing assembly actually sees the defect in an
unacceptable object.
[0012] Rejection of acceptable objects as a result of dirt clouding the windows and lenses
of viewing assemblies has also been a problem associated with known optical sorting
apparatus. Consequently, the windows and lenses of the viewing assemblies must either
be frequently cleaned or the electronic detector circuit must be regularly adjusted
to compensate for the loss in photo-amplifier signal strength due to the dirty windows
and lenses. Otherwise, an acceptable object may be rejected due to loss in photo-amplifier
signal strength.
[0013] The invention provides a method and apparatus for sorting and separating objects
such as agricultural products based on optically discernible characteristics or "defects",
and as defined in the appended claims. A preferred method according to the invention
comprises the following steps: illuminating an object to be sorted with electromagnetic
energy such as light as it moves through a viewing zone; detecting the light reflected
by or transmitted through the object and converting it into an electric signal proportional
to its intensity; comparing the elctric signal for the detected light with a pre-determined
electric signal value or "signature" for an acceptable object; and rejecting the object
if the electric signal for the detected light differs from the electric signature.
The electric signature for an acceptable object is developed by performing the method
on hand-selected objects that are acceptable except that the electric signals for
detected light from the acceptable objeots are stored for reference as the electric
signature. Additionally, a second, different electromagnetic energy such as infrared
radiation is used to determine when the object enters the viewing zone, how fast the
object is falling, and how long it takes the object to traverse the viewing zone.
[0014] The invention provides an optical sorting apparatus whioh alleviates the disadvantages
and problems of known sorting apparatus. The invention does not use painted or other
backgrounds as color references to provide a comparative reflective surface for optically
determining if an object is acceptable. Instead, a number of pre-selected acceptable
objects are optically viewed and a reference electric signature for the photo-amplifier
signals from the acceptable objects is obtained and stored in memory. A microcomputer
compares the electric signal for a viewed object with the stored electric signature
for acceptable objects and activates the rejection mechanism when they do not match
within operator determinable limits.
[0015] When the type of objects being sorted changes, the operator of the sorter simply
repeats the electric signature procedure with pre-selected acceptable objects of the
new type. For example, the electric signature can be reset when switching from peanuts
to coffee beans, or even from one type of coffee bean to another. Further, the lack
of painted backgrounds reduces or eliminates the need for extensive laboratory research
to find the right color reference for a particular type of object. Likewise, problems
associated with deteriorated or dirty backgrounds are eliminated by the absence of
painted backgrounds.
[0016] The invention addresses problems that result from the amount and proximity of equipment
packed into viewing heads of known apparatus, and problems caused by the bulkiness
of the viewing heads. As in EP-A-0 223 446, the invention uses optical fibers for
transmitting both the illuminating light and the detected light. The lamps, photo-amplifiers,
filters and electrical circuitry are located remote from the viewing head. Consequently,
only the lenses and the ends of the optical fibers are located in the viewing head
thereby reducing or eliminating the crowding and bulkiness of known viewing heads.
Further, this arrangement reduces problems due to heat effects on the photo-amplifiers
from the lamps because the lamps are separated from the photo-amplifiers. Likewise,
electrical interference to the photo-amplifier circuits from the lamp power-circuits
is reduced or eliminated. Additionally, the reduction or elimination of clouding in
the viewing head makes it possible to add more viewing assemblies than would otherwise
be feasible with viewing heads for known sorting apparatus.
[0017] Improper rejection of acceptable objects due to bunching of objects in the object
stream is alleviated by the invention. The use of light photo-amplifiers along with
two sets of infrared (IR) photo-amplifiers enables a more precise measurement of size
and rate of fall of a defective object than is possible with known sorting apparatus
and reduces or eliminates imprecise activation of the rejection mechanism. Specifically,
the two sets of IR photo-amplifiers are positioned in different planes perpendicular
to the object stream and allow a precise measurement of the rate of fall as determined
by the time it takes an individual object to fall past those two points. The rejection
mechanism is then activated based upon the exact rate of fall as calculated by a microcomputer.
Further, the combination of signals from the visual and IR detectors associate a defect
with the corresponding object by determining the presence and size of the object as
it is viewed. This contrasts with known apparatus which can only determine the presence
of a defect, but can not associate the defect with an object because the acceptably
colored part of the object cannot be distinguished from the background.
[0018] The invention also overcomes problems due to clouding of the viewing lenses or windows
with dirt. This is accomplished by monitoring the intensity of the IR detector signals
when no object is being viewed. As clouding occurs, the strength of the IR signal
decreases and the microcomputer system adjusts to compensate for the signal loss due
to clouding. When maximum compensation has been made, the microcomputer system indicates
that the viewing lenses and windows need cleaning. This reduces shutdowns for frequent
cleaning, as well as reducing or eliminating improper rejection of acceptable objects
when the viewing lenses or windows are dirty.
[0019] Known optical sorters use photo-amplifier lenses with a fixed focal point. This may
cause rejection of acceptable objects in certain situations. For example, if an acceptable
object does not fall exactly through the focal point of the photo-amplifier lens,
the corresponding signal may be inaccurate. This occurs because the lens views a larger
area of the object than would otherwise occur if the object fell exactly through the
focal point and the size of the area viewed of an object may affect the intensity
of detected light. The invention attacks this problem by focusing lenses at infinity.
Consequently, the same signal is produced regardless of where an object falls relative
to the photo-amplifier lens because it views the same size area of the object regardless
of the object's proximity to the lens.
[0020] It must also be realised that the invention also has the ability to determine how
long the object was outside the acceptable level as determined by the operator. The
operator also has the ability to determine how long, and how many times, each object
will be allowed to exceed the acceptable level of object color.
[0021] The operator also has the ability to adjust the electronics to allow any combination
of viewing assemblies to register the defect.
[0022] Various apparatus exist that will reject the object if one photo-amplifier assembly
detects any color exceeding the color tolerance set by the operator. The present invention
allows the ability for more than one photo-amplifier to detect the color exceeding
this operator adjusted level before the object is determined as being unacceptable.
The combination may be "any" to see, "all" to see, or any combination of photo-amplifiers
based on their relationship to each other.
[0023] It must be realised that with the ability of determining the length of the object,
the size of the object, the shape of the object, the position of the defect, the length
of the defect, the cross sectional size of the defect, the shape of the defect, the
number of defects per object and their location, the operator has an almost infinite
ability to accept or reject objects based on object size and shape as well as defect
size and shape and the number and location of the defect(s) on each object.
[0024] The operator also has the ability to reject an object that has no defects and accept
an object that has any defect.
[0025] Current apparatus use one rejection mechanism per viewing area. The present invention
has the ability to operate one or more rejection mechanisms per viewing area. These
rejection mechanisms may be selected so that one rejects only the color defects and
another rejects only the size defects. However, it must be realised that the operator
independently has the ability to combine size of the object, the shape of the object,
the size of the defect, the shape of the defect, position and number of each defect
of unacceptable colors with any or all of the rejection mechanisms.
[0026] The present invention has the ability to accept dark brown defects that are of small
size and reject dark brown defects that are of large size. Or the opposite if decided
by the operator. This ability is not available in current apparatus.
[0027] In known apparatus the time delay and duration of the operation of the rejection
mechanism is preset for the type of object to be rejected.
[0028] The present invention allows the rejection mechanism to be individually adjusted
for each object. The output from an IR photo-amplifier beam located in a plane below
or above a red and green viewing area of the viewing head is compared with the output
of another IR photo-amplifier which is synchronized to the red and green photo-amplifiers,
and the two IR outputs are used to give a time lapse for an object to pass between
the first and second IR beam.
[0029] This time duration is then stored in memory and used to determine the proper time
to start the rejection mechanism. This starting time varies for each object as determined
by the speed of the object through the viewing zone.
[0030] The rejection mechanism remains on for the proper time to reject each defective object.
The duration of this "on time" will vary for each defective object because of variations
in the individual object lengths, and the "on time" is determined as a function of
the detecting and signal processing circuits. The operator has the ability to adjust
the "on time" as a function of object length, but it must be realised that the actual
"on time" of the rejection mechanism may vary for each object to be rejected.
[0031] Various results may be stored by the present invention and these may include, but
are not limited to, the number of objects rejected for each set of criteria including
individual colors, location of defect(s), number of defects, size of defects, and
size, shape and orientation of the object.
[0032] Because of the ability top count each object piece, not just the number of defective
pieces, the invention has the ability to automatically adjust the feeder mechanism
to maintain a constant throughput.
[0033] Various alarm messages are available to the operator that will indicate abnormal
operation. These include, but are not limited to, dirty glass, too may objects of
a certain type being rejected, reject mechanism operating erratically, no air pressure,
illuminating lamp(s) not bright enough, and insufficient or too many objects being
conveyed. The operator has the ability to override these alarm situations or correct
them.
[0034] Further, the invention requires significantly less illumination than is required
in known sorting apparatus. In known sorting apparatus the entire viewing zone is
illuminated to provide sufficient reflected light from the object and background for
the photo-amplifiers. In contrast, the apparatus of the invention illuminates only
the object because there is no background that needs to be illuminated. Consequently,
the lamp power required for the apparatus for the invention is less than is required
for known sorting apparatus.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0035]
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a viewing head for an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the viewing head of FIG. 1 taken along the section
lines II-II of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the signal processing means.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
DETECTING AND OBJECT SENSING MEANS
[0036] Referring to FIG. 1, a perspective drawing of a viewing head 1 of the optical sorting
apparatus for the invention is shown. FIG. 2, likewise, shows a cross-sectional view
of the viewing head 1. The viewing head 1 encloses a cylindrical viewing zone 2, and
objects to be viewed move axially through the center of the viewing zone 2 in an object
stream.
[0037] The viewing head a includes four illuminating assemblies 3-6; two combination viewing/IR
assemblies 7 and 8; and two IR assemblies 9 and 10. The viewing/IR assemblies 7 and
8 are preferably arranged in the viewing head 1 parallel to the end faces of the viewing
head, and each viewing/IR assembly points to the center of the viewing zone 2. Preferrably
the illuminating assemblies 3 and 5 are arranged in the viewing head directly above
the viewing/IR assemblies 7 and 8, respectively, such that the path of the light projected
by the illuminating assemblies and reflected by an object in the viewing zone forms
an acute angle between the illuminating assemblies and the viewing/IR assemblies where
the vertex of the angle is located at the center of the viewing zone. Likewise, the
illuminating assemblies 4 and 6 are located directly below viewing/IR assemblies 7
and 8 respectively, such that the light projected from them forms an acute angle with
the vertex at the center of the viewing zone. This arrangement helps to insure that
no light is collected by the viewing/IR assemblies 7 and 8 unless some part of an
object is in the center of the viewing zone 2 and reflects that light to the viewing/IR
assemblies.
[0038] The illuminating assemblies 3-6 are connected to one end of optic fiber bundles 11-14,
respectively. Each illuminating assembly 3-6 is supplied with light via optic fiber
bundles 11-14 from a commercially available light source 19 remote to the viewing
head 1. Light from the light source 19 is transmitted into the ends of optic fiber
bundles 11-14 that are remote to the viewing head 1 by a light source focusing means
20. The light source focusing means 20 comprises a series of lenses to collect, focus,
and project light from the light source to the ends of the optic fiber bundles.
[0039] The light source 19 may provide white light and comprise a quartz halogen incandescent
lamp. Alternately, the light source may be replaced by a substantially monochromatic
light source such as an array of light emitting diodes (LEDs). The LED array may be
selected to provide an output having any convenient light frequency or color.
[0040] The optic fiber bundles 11-14 are formed from individual optic fibers and may have
any suitable length and cross section. The optic fibers may comprise glass or plastic,
or other suitable material.
[0041] The viewing/IR assemblies 7 and 8 are connected to one end of optic fiber bundles
15 and 16, respectively. Similarly, IR assemblies 9 and 10 are connected to one end
of optic fiber bundles 17 and 18, respectively. Each optic fiber bundles 15-18 comprises
multiple optic fibers of any suitable length and cross section which may comprise
glass, plastic, or other suitable material.
[0042] The illumination assemblies 3-6, viewing/IR assemblies 7 and 8, and IR assemblies
9 and 10, each comprise a set of lenses. The lens sets for illuminating assemblies
3-6 transmit light from optic fiber bundles 11-14 to the viewing zone 2, and each
set is designed to focus light on the center of the viewing zone.
[0043] The lens sets for viewing/IR assemblies 7 and 8 collect light reflected from objects
in the viewing zone 2 and transmit it to optic fiber bundles 15 and 16. Each viewing/IR
assembly lens set is preferably designed for infinite focus at the viewing zone end.
The lens set for viewing/IR assembly 7 also collects IR from the viewing zone 2, and
the lens set for viewing/IR assembly 8 also transmits IR to the viewing zone 2. The
lens set for IR assembly 9 collects IR from an area below the viewing zone 2, and
the lens set for IR assembly 10 transmits IR to the same area below the viewing zone
2.
[0044] Each assembly, 3-10, may require multiple lens sets to cover the end face of the
corresponding optic fiber bundles 11-18. If multiple lens sets are used in an assembly
they may be staggered in an arrangement like 'bricks' to minimize the occurrence of
blind spots.
[0045] The ends of the optic fiber bundles 15 and 16, which are remote from the viewing
head 1, project the light that they transmit into lens arrays 21 and 22, respectively.
The lens arrays 21 and 22 collect and focus the light and project it into dichroic
filters 23 and 24.
[0046] Generally, dichroic filters separate light into two beams of different frequency.
Dichroic filters contain a material that passes light above a certain frequency but
reflects light below that frequency. The dichroic material is positioned in the filter
at a 45 degree angle to the path of the entering light, and consequently, the reflected
light emerges from the filter at a 90 degree angle from the path of the entering light
while the non-reflected light passes straight through the filter.
[0047] Dichroic filters 23 and 24 use a material that reflects IR but passes light with
frequencies higher than IR. Thus, dichroic filter 24 reflects IR transmitted to it
by viewing/IR assembly 7 and passes light above that frequency which is transmitted
to it by viewing/IR assembly 7. Dichroic filter 23, however, is used to project IR
into optic fiber bundles 16 and 18. IR from an IR generator 27 is projected into the
dichroic filter 23 such that it is transmitted via the optic fiber bundles 16 and
18 to the viewing zone 2. It should be appreciated that dichroic filter 23 receives
light from the viewing zone 2 via optic fiber bundle 16 and passes this light.
[0048] The light that passes through dichroic filters 23 and 24 is then projected into dichroic
filters 25 and 26, respectively. Dichroic filters 25 and 26 use a material that separates
the light into two beams so that the beam that is passed includes "green" light and
the beam that is reflected includes "red" light. Thus, dichroic filters 25 and 26
each produce a "red" and "green" beam of light. The individual beams of "red" and
"green" light are directed to separate photo-amplifiers.
[0049] Fiber optic bundle 17 transmits IR collected by the lens set of IR assembly 9 to
lens array 28. Lens array 28 collects and focuses the IR for transmittal to a photo-amplifier.
[0050] More illuminating assemblies and viewing/IR assemblies may be necessary or desirable
depending on the size, shape, and nature of the object being viewed. Generally, sufficient
illuminating assemblies and associated viewing/IR assemblies are required to view
substantially all of the surface area of the objects being sorted. For example, four
sets of assemblies with each set comprising two illuminating assemblies and one viewing/IR
assembly may be spaced at 90 degree increments around the circumference of the viewing
head.
[0051] If more viewing/IR assemblies are used then the red and green light from each assembly
is separated into individual red and green beams, respectively. Further, all IR collected
by viewing/IR assemblies is separated into individual beams, and all IR that is collected
by IR assemblies may be separated into individual beams.
[0052] The system of illuminating assemblies and associated optic fiber bundles, lens sets,
lens array, and light source along with the viewing/IR assemblies and associated optic
fiber bundles, lens sets, lens arrays, and dichroic filters comprise a detecting means.
The detecting means optically detects discernible defects in objects being sorted.
[0053] The detecting means may be multichromatic or monochromatic. If a monochromatic detecting
means is used then the dichroic mirrors 25 and 26 for separating light into two beams
of different frequency are eliminated. It should be appreciated that a multichromatic
detecting means may separate light at any frequency desired and may effect multiple
separations as desired to optimize its ability to detect defects in a particular type
of object.
[0054] The system of IR assemblies and viewing/IR assemblies and associated optic fiber
bundles, lens sets, lens arrays, dichroic filters, and IR generator comprise an object
sensing means. The object sensing means determines the presence, size, and rate of
fall of an object being sorted. The sensing means may comprise electromagnetic energy
other than IR as appropriate depending on the electromagnetic energy used for the
detecting means and the nature of the objects being sorted.
[0055] It should be appreciated that the object sensing means comprises at least two separate
sets of IR beams. Any number of IR beams may be used in each set, particularly where
variation in object size is relatively large. For example, two IR beams may be arranged
at an 90 degree angle such that the two IR beams intersect with each other and with
the path of the object stream. The second set of IR beams is located such that it
intersects the object stream in a plane that is different than the plane of the first
set of IR beams.
SIGNAL PROCESSING MEANS AND ELECTRIC SIGNATURE PROCEDURE
[0056] The object to be sorted is introduced to the viewing zone and as the object passes
through the viewing zone it intersects the first IR beam which determines the presence
of an object in view and how long it takes the object to traverse the viewing zone.
It should be appreciated that the signal from the viewing zone IR photo-amplifier
will decrease proportionately to the degree of blockage caused by the section of the
object in view, and if no decrease is detected then no object is in view. The output
of the viewing zone and subviewing zone IR photo-amplifiers is therefore capable of
determining when an object first enters the viewing area, how wide it is at any point
of its length, and how long it is. At the same time that the viewing zone IR photo-amplifier
is sensing an object, the red and green photo-amplifiers are determining the color
of the section of the object in view. The outputs of the IR photo-amplifiers and the
red and green photo-amplifiers are continuously processed and the result compared
to the previously stored electric signature for acceptable objects.
[0057] Referring to FIG. 3, the red beam 41, green beam 42, viewing zone IR beam 43, and
subviewing zone IR beam 44 are detected by photo-amplifiers 45, 46, 47, and 48 which
generate signals 49, 50, 51 and 52. These signals 49, 50, 51, and 52 are proportional
to the intensity of the red beam 41, green beam 42, and IR beams 43 and 44 detected
by the respective photo-amplifiers 45, 46, 47, and 48.
[0058] The operator has the ability to individually adjust each of the signal strengths
for the four signals 49, 50, 51, and 52 by adjusting gain adjusters 53, 54, 55 and
56 to produce signals 57, 58, 59 and 60. The gain adjusters 53, 54, 55 and 56 may
also include amplifiers. It may be necessary to increase or decrease the signal strength
for signals 49 and 50 from red and green photo-amplifiers 45 and 46 depending on the
intensity of the defects on the objects to be sorted.
[0059] The gain adjusters 55 and 56 may be used to increase the signal strength for signals
51 and 52 for IR beams 43 and 44 depending on the degree of blockage of the beams
caused by the average size of the object to be sorted. For example, if the size of
the object is almost the full width of the beam, the gain will need to be increased
to compensate for the reduced amount of IR beam not blocked by the object.
[0060] When no object is in the viewing zone, signals 57 and 58 from the red and green photo-amplifiers
45 and 46 are zero and signal 59 is at its maximum value because no object is present
to reflect light and block the viewing zone IR beam. Similarly, when no object blocks
the subviewing zone IR beam, signal 60 is at its maximum value.
[0061] During the electric signature setting procedure, the operator sets switch 61 to the
on position and then feeds preselected acceptable objects through the viewing zone.
Switch 61 produces signals 62 and 63 when it is in the on position, and also clears
both analog memories 67 and 68. Signals 62 and 63 are fed to 3-way AND gates 64 and
65, respectively. Signal 57 is converted by an analog to digital converter to a digital
signal and fed to 3-way AND gate 64. Signal 58 is also converted by an analog to digital
converter and ged to 3-way AND gate 65. It should be appreciated that the analog to
digital converters for signals 57 and 58 will only give a positive digital signal
when signals 57 and 58 give a positive, analog signal indicating that red or green
beams of light are being detected, respectively.
[0062] Signal 66, which is derived from signal 59 for the viewing zone IR beam, is also
converted by analog to digital converters and fed into both 3-way AND gates 64 and
65. Again, the analog to digital converters for signal 66 will only give a positive,
digital signal when signal 66 is a positive, analog signal indicating the presence
of an object in the viewing zone that is blocking the viewing zone IR beam. When 3-way
AND gates 64 and 65 receive positive, digital signals from each of their three inputs,
they generate an enabling signal to the red and green analog memories 67 and 68, respectively.
[0063] At the same time that the red and green analog memories are being enabled, signals
57 and 66 in analog form are fed to multiplier 69, and signals 58 and 66 in analog
form are fed to multiplier 70. Multiplier 69 multiplies signal 57 by signal 66 to
produce signal 71. Multiplier 70 multiplies signal 58 by signal 66 to produce signal
72. Signals 71 and 72 are fed to amplifiers and then fed to the red and green analog
memories 67 and 68, respectively. When the operator notes that the values for signals
71 and 72 have achieved a stable level as indicated by a simple voltage level indicator
(not shown), he switches off switch 61 causing signals 71 and 72 to be stored in the
red and green analog memories 67 and 68 as the red and green signature for acceptable
objects.
[0064] After the red and green electric signatures are determined and the gain settings
53, 54, 55 and 56 are selected, the object to be sorted is conveyed through the viewing
zone. A signal 71 will be generated as described above but for the object to be sorted.
Signal 71 is then split and fed to steering diodes 73 and 74. If signal 71 is positive,
steering diode 73 allows the positive amplitude of the signal to pass on to comparator
77, which also contains an AND gate, otherwise the output of steering diode 73 is
zero. If signal 71 is negative, steering diode 74 allows the negative amplitude of
the signal to pass on to comparator 78, which also contains an AND gate, otherwise
the output of steering diode 74 is zero. The output signal 79 which is the red electric
signature of the red analog memory 67 is continuously fed to both comparator 77 and
comparator 78. Comparators 77 and 78 generate signals 80 and 81 which are proportional
to the difference between the red electric signature and the signals from steering
diodes 73 and 74, but only if the comparator has also been enabled by signal 82 indicating
that an object is being viewed which is derived from signal 59 for the viewing zone
IR beam, and only if the output from the respective steering diodes is not zero, thus
indicating that a signal derived from signal 71 is being applied.
[0065] Signals 80 and 81 are fed to comparators 83 and 84. A trip level 85 set by the operator
is also fed to comparator 83 which causes the comparator to generate an output signal
88 if signal 80 exceeds the preselected trip level 85. Likewise, a preset trip level
86 is fed into comparator 84 which causes the comparator 84 to generate an output
signal 89 if signal 81 exceeds the preset trip level 86.
[0066] If signal 72 which is responsive to the green beam reflected from the object to be
sorted is positive, steering diode 75 allows the positive amplitude of signal 72 to
be fed to comparator 90. Likewise, if signal 72 is negative, steering diode 76 allows
the negative amplitude of signal 72 to be fed to comparator 91. The green electric
signature, signal 92, from the green analog memory 68 is continuously fed to comparators
90 and 91. Comparator 90 generates an output 93 that is indicative of the difference
between the green electric signature and the positive amplitude of signal 72. Likewise,
comparator 91 generates a signal 94 that is indicative of the difference between the
green electric signature and the negative amplitude of signal 72. Signals 93 and 94
are only generated by comparators 90 and 91 if enabling signal 82 which indicates
an object is being viewed is present at comparators 90 and 91, and only if the output
from the respective steering diodes is not zero, thus indicating that a signal derived
from signal 71 is being applied. Signal 93 is fed into comparator 95 along with trip
level 97 set by the operator, and comparator 95 generates an output signal 99 if signal
93 exceeds trip level 97. Likewise, signal 94 is fed into comparator 96 along with
trip level 98 set by the operator, and the comparator 96 generates an output signal
100 if signal 94 exceeds trip level 98.
[0067] Signal 59 is fed to zero cross detector 101 which generates signal 82. The zero cross
detector 101 only generates signal 82 when signal 59 falls below its maximum value
indicating that the viewing zone IR beam is being partially blocked by an object being
viewed. Thus, signal 82 will only be generated if an object is being viewed. As noted
above, signal 82 is then used to enable comparators 77, 78, 90 and 91. Signals 88,
89, 99 and 100, if generated, are fed to latch gate 102 along with signal 82. If signal
82 and any of signals 88, 89, 99 or 100 are present at latch gate 102, then signal
103 from oscillator 104 is passed by latch gate 102 onto frequency divider 105. It
should be appreciated that this situation will occur only when an object is both present
in the viewing zone and has been determined to have a defect by an output signal from
comparators 83, 84, 95 or 96. The frequency divider 105 is adjustable by the operator
for different types of object and typically will be about 50% to 75% of the incoming
frequency.
[0068] The output 106 of the frequency divider 105 is fed to a differentiator 107. The differentiator
107 generates an output 108 for as long as it receives a signal 106 from the frequency
divider 105. The signal 108 is stored by the first in, first out (FIFO) storage device
109 for as long as the signal 108 occurs. It should be appreciated that the signal
108 stored by the FIFO 109 is indicative of the length of time that it takes a defective
object to traverse the viewing zone. This signal is then used by the FIFO 109 to determine
the dwell time that the rejection mechanism is activated for rejecting that defective
object.
[0069] Signal 60, which is proportional to the subviewing zone IR beam, is fed to zero cross
detector 110 where it generates a signal 111 which occurs only when signal 60 is below
its maximum value indicating that an object has interrupted the subviewing zone IR
beam. When signal 82 from zero cross detector 101 is first generated indicating that
an object has interrupted the viewing zone IR beam, it activates flip flop circuit
112. When the same object interrupts the subviewing zone IR beam, the signal 111 from
the zero cross detector 110 for the subviewing zone IR beam deactivates the flip flop
circuit 112. Between the time when the flip flop circuit 112 is activated by signal
82 and deactivated by signal 111, it outputs a signal 113 which is fed to gate 114.
A signal 115 from the oscillator 104 is constantly fed to gate 114.
[0070] The gate 114 passes the oscillator signal 115 onto the delay line 116 only when the
signal 113 from the flip flop circuit is present. The signal 115 is also fed directly
into a binary comparator 117. At the same time, the delay line 116 gives an output
118 which is fed to the binary comparator 117. The binary comparator 117 gives an
output 119, but only when signal 118 has equaled signal 115. This only occurs when
the amount of time indicated by signal 115 plus the amount of delay time added by
the operator with the delay line 116 has occurred. Therefore, the operator has the
ability to delay the output 119 of the binary comparator for as long as desired by
adjusting delay line 116. The output 119 of the binary comparator 117 is indicative
of the amount of time it will take for the defective object to reach the rejection
mechanism, and is used to start the rejection mechanism at the proper time. The output
119 of the binary comparator 117 is also fed back to the binary comparator 117 to
reset it so that it is ready to determine the delay time for the next object.
[0071] The signal 119 from the binary comparator 117 is fed to the FIFO device 109 along
with the signal 108 which is representative of the dwell time of the object. The FIFO
device 109 acts by starting the rejection mechanism when it receives the signal 119
from the binary comparator 117 and keeps the rejection mechanism activated for as
long as indicated by the signal 108.
[0072] It must be appreciated that in operation there may be a number of objects in transit
between the first and second IR beams each one of which may require individual dwell
and delay adjustments. This will require more latching, storing and timing circuits
but these have been left out of this discussion in the interest of clarity.
[0073] The individual outputs 88, 89, 99 and 100 can also be sent to a FIFO and binary comparator
device and this will enable the operator to select the number of pulses per output
for individual pulses of the zero cross detector. This enables the operator to select,
for example, an object that has only two defects as determined by signal 88 but reject
an object with 3 defects from signal 88. It must be appreciated that any combination
of number of defects can be selected by the operator based on any or all of the signals
88, 89, 99 and 100.
[0074] Similarly, these signals can be processed, stored and compared to an oscillator output
acting as a real time clock and the rejection mechanism operated based on length of
time individual defects were detected. This gives the operator the ability to accept
or reject objects with defects above or below a certain size.
[0075] When the operator is setting the red and green electric signature for an acceptable
object, the first IR beam 43 is changing from a strong signal to a lesser signal depending
on the degree of blockage caused by the size of the object in view. However, in operation
the viewing glass may become covered with a layer of dust and this will decrease the
level of IR being detected even when no object is in view. This will adversely affect
the gain of the signals 57 and 58.
[0076] This problem is addressed by the signal processing means bounded in the area titled
"Dirty Glass Adjust". Signal 82, the output of the zero cross detector 101, is used
to enable the amplifier and analog memory 120. When signal 82 gives the closest signal
to maximum possible and thus signifies that no object is in view the "Dirty Glass
Adjust" circuit is enabled and the output 66 of the amplifier is allowed to change
from the previous setting. No change will occur if the signal strength 59 is the same
as the last time it was adjusted.
[0077] The new signal 66 is then applied to the red and green multipliers 69 and 70 and
this new setting effectively overcomes the effect of loss of signal strength caused
by dust on the viewing surfaces. It must be appreciated that this adjustment can be
up or down depending on whether the glass is cleaner or dirtier than it was at the
last adjustment.
[0078] The strongest IR signal 59 obtained with clean glass is stored in a comparator not
shown in Fig. 3 and powered by a stand-by battery. When the operator selects the electric
signature sequence this stored signal is compared with the IR signal 59 detected and
if it determines the glass is dirty, the operator is alerted by a commercially available
alarm so that the glass can be cleaned before the electric signature procedure is
commenced.
[0079] Signal 113 can be sampled and the frequency generated by flip-flop 112 maintained
as a constant by adjusting the feeder circuit (not shown) to maintain a constant flow
rate through the viewing zone 2.
[0080] Signal 82 can be sampled and its amplitude or duration, or both, compared with stored
values and the rejection mechanism activated if the sampled values differ from the
stored values by more than a predetermined amount.
[0081] It must be appreciated that the block diagram in Fig.3 is described as primarily
an analog circuit and the preferred method of implementation is to multiplex the signals
57, 58, 59 and 60 and convert them to digital pulses by commercially available analog
to digital converters and process all of the signals including the electric signature,
ejector dwell and ejector delay, trip settings, dirty glass adjust, number and size
of defects, etc. by digital instead of analog technology.
[0082] The preferred Digital Signal Processor is a Texas Instrument TMS320E15JD but any
suitable commercially available item could be used. In this embodiment, the gain adjustments
53, 54, 55 and 56 are preferred to be digital to analog converters which may be adjusted
both by the operator during initial setting up of the machine and by the processor
during operation.
[0083] In the preferred embodiment, all operator adjustments should be performed via panel
switches which may be first processed by a microprocessor.
REJECTION MECHANISM
[0084] Referring to FIG.2 a rejection mechanism 28 is shown. The rejection mechanism comprises
a commercially available solenoid actuated valve that controls a supply of compressed
air. The rejection mechanism 28 is located proximate to the object stream below the
viewing head 1 and when activated provides a jet of air which deflects a defective
object from the normal path of the object stream.
[0085] The features disclosed in the foregoing description, in the following Claims and/or
in the accompanying drawings may, both separately and in any combination thereof,
be material for realising the invention in diverse forms thereof.
1. A method for distinguishing unacceptable objects which differ in coloration from
acceptable objects, characterised by:
a) projecting an effective amount of radiation which is responsive to object coloration
on an acceptable object;
b) detecting a portion of the radiation reflected by the acceptable object, and generating
an electric signal which is proportional to the intensity of the radiation detected;
c) storing the electric signal as a reference electric signature for acceptable objects;
d) repeating steps (a) and (b) for objects to be sorted; and
e) comparing the electric signal for the object to be sorted with the electric signature
for acceptable objects, and generating a difference signal if the difference between
the electric signal and the electric signature exceeds a pre-selected value.
2. A method according to claim 1, further characterised in that the radiation comprises
visible light.
3. A method according to claim 2, further characterised in that the radiation comprises
monochromatic light.
4. A method for distinguishing unacceptable objects which differ in coloration from
acceptable objects, characterised by
a) projecting an effective amount of a radiation which is responsive to object coloration
on an acceptable object;
b) separating the radiation reflected by the acceptable object into a plurality of
component bands of radiation;
c) individually detecting each of the component bands of radiation, and generating
an electric signal for each component band of radiation which is proportional to the
intensity of that component band of radiation;
d) storing the electric signals for each component band of radiation as a reference
electric signature for acceptable objects for that component band of radiation;
e) repeating steps (a) through (c) for objects to be sorted; and
f) individually comparing the electric signals for each component band of radiation
for the object to be sorted with the corresponding electric signals from the electric
signature for acceptable objects, and generating individual difference signals corresponding
to the particular component band of radiation if the difference between the electric
signal for that band and the electric signature for that band exceeds a pre-selected
value.
5. A method for distinguishing unacceptable objects which differ in size or coloration
from acceptable objects, characterised by
a) passing an acceptable object through a viewing zone;
b) projecting an effective amount of first radiation on the acceptable object as it
passes through the viewing zone;
c) detecting a portion of the first radiation reflected by the acceptable object,
and generating an electric signal proportional to the intensity of the first radiation
detected;
d) projecting a beam of second radiation across the viewing zone such that the acceptable
object blocks a portion of the beam proportionate to the acceptable object's size
as the acceptable object passes through the viewing zone.
e) detecting the portion of the beam not blocked by the acceptable object as it passes
through the viewing zone, and generating a second electric signal proportional to
the amount of the beam not blocked by the acceptable object;
(f) storing the first and second electric signals as a reference electric signature
for acceptable objects;
g) repeating steps (a) through (e) for an object to be sorted;
h) comparing the first electric signal for the object to be sorted with the first
electric signal of the electric signature for acceptable objects, and generating a
difference signal if the difference between the two signals exceeds a pre-selected
value; and
i) comparing the second electric signal for the object to be sorted with the second
electric signal of the reference electric signature for acceptable objects, and generating
a difference signal if the difference between the two signals exceeds a pre-selected
value.
6. A method according to claim 5, further characterised by projecting a second beam
of the second radiation across the path of the object stream that is different from
the first beam such that the electric signals for the first and second beam are processed
to determine the rate of the movement of objects in the object stream.
7. A method according to claim 5, further characterised in that
a) the electric signal for the set of beams of the second radiation that pass across
the viewing zone are summed with an electric signal substantially equivalent in magnitude
to the electric signal produced by the set of beams when no object is being viewed:
b) the electric signal for the radiation reflected by the objects being viewed is
adjusted by a factor such that when an acceptable object of that type is being viewed
the electric signal will be substantially equivalent in magnitude to the electric
signal from step (a);
c) the electric signal for the radiation reflected by the objects being viewed is
summed with the electric signal produced from step (a);
d) the summed electric signal produced in step (c) is summed with a reference electrical
signal corresponding to the signal produced from step (c) for acceptable objects.
8. Apparatus for sorting an unacceptable object moving in an object stream which differs
in a desired characteristic from an acceptable object moving in the object stream
wherein the differences between acceptable and unacceptable objects are detectable
by an appropriate first radiation, comprising:
a) an object viewing zone;
b) a source of the appropriate first radiation arranged to project the first radiation
on each object as it passes through the viewing zone;
c) a detector arranged such that the first radiation reflected from an object passing
through the viewing zone is received by the detector and converted into an electric
signal which is a function of the amount of the first radiation received by the detector;
d) means for processing and saving the electric signal as an electric signature for
objects that have been designated as acceptable;
e) means for comparing the electric signal for each object being sorted with the electric
signature for acceptable such objects to generate a difference electric signal reflecting
any difference between the object being sorted and an acceptable object; and
f) means responsive to a pre-selected level of said difference electric signal for
rejecting objects whose difference electric signal exceeds the pre-selected value.
9. Apparatus according to claim 8, wherein said appropriate radiation is visible light.
10. Apparatus according to claim 8 or 9, wherein said source of appropriate radiation
is remote from the object viewing zone and includes an optic fiber adapted to transmit
light from the remote source through the viewing zone.
11. Apparatus according to claim 8, 9 or 10, wherein said source of light directs
the light to the viewing zone in such a way that when no objects are in the viewing
zone no light is detected by the detector.
12. Apparatus according to claim 8, 9, 10 or 11, wherein the detector is remote from
the viewing zone and includes an optic fiber adapted to transmit reflected light from
the viewing zone to the detector.
13. Apparatus according to any one of claims 8 to 12, wherein the source of appropriate
radiation provides light having a range of frequencies, and wherein the apparatus
further comprises at least one dichroic filter to separate the light into a plurality
of beams of different frequency ranges.
14. Apparatus according to any one of claims 8 to 13, further comprising a lens which
has an infinite focus arranged such that it collects and focuses radiation reflected
from objects passing through the viewing zone and transmits said radiation to the
detector.
15. Apparatus according to any one of claims 8 to 14, further including an object
sensing means for sensing an object in the viewing zone comprising:
a) a second radiation source that is different from the radiation used for the illuminating
means;
b) means for transmitting said second radiation from its source to the viewing zone;
c) means for projecting said second radiation across the viewing zone;
d) means for receiving said radiation projected across the viewing zone and transmitting
it to a detector;
e) a detector capable of converting said second radiation to electric signals proportional
to the intensity of the energy detected.
16. Apparatus according to claim 15, wherein the second radiation is in the infrared
(IR) region of the radiation spectrum.
17. Apparatus according to claim 15 or 16, further comprising a plurality of optical
fibers for transmitting the second radiation from its source to the viewing zone and
from the viewing zone to the detector.
18. Apparatus according to claims 16 and 17, further comprising bifurcated fiber optic
bundles such that each bundle receives visible and IR light at the end adjacent to
the viewing zone and transmits both the visible light and IR light to the first bifurcated
end adjacent to the detector and to a second bifurcated end located adjacent to the
second radiation source or the second radiation detector.
19. Apparatus according to claim 18, comprising bifurcated fiber optic bundles such
that each bundle receives visible light and projects IR light at the end adjacent
to the viewing zone and transmits visible light to a first bifurcated end located
adjacent to the detector and receives IR light at a second bifurcated end located
adjacent to the second radiation source.
20. Apparatus according to any one of claims 8 to 19, wherein the rejecting means
rejects objects into different groupings depending on the magnitude of the difference
signals.
21. A method of sorting unacceptable objects of a type from acceptable objects which
comprise:
a) passing an acceptable object through a viewing zone;
b) irradiating the acceptable object with a first radiation responsive to color variations
in the viewing zone;
c) detecting a portion of the first radiation which has been reflected by or transmitted
through the acceptable object and generating a first electric signal which is proportional
to the intensity of the portion of the first radiation detected;
d) repeating steps (b) and (c) with a second radiation responsive to the size and
presence of the object being viewed at substantially the same time as steps (b) and
(c) to produce a second electric signal;
e) storing the first and second electric signals as a reference electric signature
for acceptable objects;
f) repeating steps (a) through (d) for objects whose acceptability is undetermined;
and
g) comparing the first and second electric signals obtained from step (f) for the
object whose acceptability is undetermined with the reference electric signature of
step (e) and generating a first and second difference signal if the difference between
the first electric signals and the second electric signals exceeds a pre-selected
value.