Field Of The Invention
[0001] This invention generally relates to refractory wall systems and, particularly, to
a refractory brick wall system for towers and the like.
Background Of The Invention
[0002] Gas conditioning or cooling towers are used in waste incineration systems, whether
household or hazardous, and have become important in the growing chemical waste area.
Such cooling towers often are constructed with an interior tile or brick wall design.
The towers usually are cylindrical in configuration, but a circular cross configuration
is not absolutely limiting. Such towers also are applied to quench and cooling chambers
in existing incineration systems.
[0003] The tile or brick wall design of such structures are refractory in nature because
of exposure to various conditions such as high temperature, moisture, an acid atmosphere,
turbulent air flow and in applications of fluidized bed reactors. Such structures
also must be capable of being installed vertically, horizontally or at an angle, and
they must be used in both stationary and transportable applications. Consequently,
the invention is shown herein as applied to a vertical cylindrical cooling tower but
it should be understood that this is but for illustration purposes only and the terms
"vertical" or "horizontal" herein and in the claims hereof should not be limiting
but exemplary in description only.
[0004] Because of the type of environment described, various problems are encountered and
various needs must to be fulfilled in designing a refractory brick wall system for
towers and the like. For instance, there is an excess refractory weight which builds
up from slagging on the wall elevation which must be relieved in order to allow higher
walls to be constructed. Stresses from refractory thermal growth must be relieved
or eliminated. It would be desirable to provide for some vertical and horizontal
growth freedom of movement in the refractory brick wall during heat-up and to allow
for thermal expansion and contraction during use. It would be desirable to facilitate
repair of the refractory wall in a sectionalized manner to avoid having to remove
and/or replace large areas of the brick wall. It would be desirable to provide some
form of positive structural tie-back of the refractory bricks while still allowing
for freedom of thermal movement within the refractory wall.
[0005] The wall design also should be virtually airtight and prevent penetration of corrosive
gases and condensation. The wall design also should be of an insulating construction.
[0006] These many and varied problems, considerations and needs cause many dilemmas in designing
an appropriate refractory brick wall system and constant efforts are being made to
improve such structures, particularly in the ever-expanding field of waste incineration.
This invention is directed to solving the above problems and dilemmas and satisfying
the above and other needs in this field.
Summary Of The Invention
[0007] An object, therefore, of the invention is to provide a new and improved refractory
brick wall system for towers and the like.
[0008] In the exemplary embodiment of the invention, the system includes an outside casing,
such as a cylindrical steel outside wall. A plurality of bricks are laid up in a pattern
on the inside of the casing. Tie-back means are provided for securing the bricks to
the casing. The tie-back means include means for allowing both relative horizontal
movement and relative vertical movement between the bricks and the casing.
[0009] In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the tie-back means include a plurality
of angle brackets having distal ends fixed to the inside of the casing. Generally
U-shaped arms cooperate with the brackets and the bricks to afford both horizontal
pivoting of the arms and vertical sliding of the arms relative to both the brackets
and the bricks to allow for thermal movement of the bricks. Specifically, each U-shaped
arm has one leg slidably and pivotally received in a respective bracket, while the
other leg of the U-shape is freely received in a recess in one of the bricks.
[0010] As shown herein, a plurality of the aforedescribed tie-back devices are arranged
in vertically spaced horizontal rows, with the tie-back devices in one row being
horizontally offset relative to the tie-back devices in an adjacent row. The bricks
themselves are interlocked such that the horizontally and vertically spaced tie-back
devices are effective to tie the entire refractory brick wall back to the steel casing,
while allowing thermal movement of the wall relative to the casing.
[0011] Another feature of the invention is the provision of shelf means fixed to the inside
of the casing at vertically spaced intervals to provide support for the bricks in
vertical sections thereof. In the preferred embodiment, the shelf means is in the
form of generally L-shaped shelf members with one leg of the L fixed to the casing
means and the other leg of the L projecting from the casing means, such as between
horizontal joints of horizontal rows of refractory bricks. Such shelf means not only
relieve excess refractory weight build-up from slagging on the wall elevation and
virtually eliminate stresses from refractory thermal growth, but the spaced shelf
members allow for sectional repair of the refractory brick wall.
[0012] A further feature of the invention includes a castable filler means between the casing
means and the bricks. The filler means is of a lightweight refractory material having
insulating value for resistance to heat passage through the construction. The filler
means reduces refractory cold-faced temperature and provides a barrier for gas and
condensation penetration to the steel casing structure.
[0013] The refractory bricks themselves are of an interlocking design of at least two species
having peripheral rings on the sides thereof. The rings of one species of brick define
a shape that is a mirror image of the shape of a brick of the other species to provide
interlocking means between the bricks when laid up side-by-side. Specifically, each
brick has a generally flat inner face, a generally flat outer face and side faces
defining the interlocking rings. The inner face of one of the species of brick is
narrower than the inner face of the other species of brick, and the inner face of
the other species of brick is defined by one of the peripheral rings. The inner and
outer faces of the bricks are generally parallel (i.e. generally vertical in a tower
construction), with the side faces of the bricks being oblique to the inner and outer
faces in such a manner as to angle downwardly and inwardly toward the center of a
tower construction, for instance. This helps to minimize condensation and gas penetration
through the joints of the refractory bricks because liquids, particularly, seek their
lowest level and will flow inwardly and downwardly of the wall structure.
[0014] Other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the
following detailed description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Brief Description Of The Drawings
[0015] The features of this invention which are believed to be novel are set forth with
particularity in the appended claims. The invention, together with its objects and
the advantages thereof, may be best understood by reference to the following description
taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals
identify like elements in the figures and in which:
FIGURE 1 is a vertical section, partially broken away and somewhat schematically illustrated,
of a general configuration of a cooling tower embodying the refractory brick wall
system of the invention;
FIGURE 2 is a fragmented, perspective view of a section of the refractory brick wall
system, as viewed from the inside of the cooling tower;
FIGURE 3 is a fragmented horizontal section through a portion of the outer casing,
at a horizontal joint between the refractory brick, to show the brick configuration
and the tie-back means;
FIGURE 4 is a top plan view of one species of refractory brick according to the invention;
FIGURE 5 is a rear elevational view of the brick of Figure 4;
FIGURE 6 is a side elevational view of the brick of Figure 4;
FIGURE 7 is a top plan view of a second species of refractory brick according to the
invention;
FIGURE 8 is a front elevational view of the brick of Figure 7;
FIGURE 9 is a side elevational view of the brick of Figure 7;
FIGURE 10 is a somewhat schematic illustration of a horizontal section through the
outer casing, simply to show the horizontal spacing within a circular row of the tie-back
means for the refractory brick wall; and
FIGURE 11 is a fragmented elevational view of a section of the inside of the casing
to illustrate the horizontal and vertical spacing of the tie-back means.
Detailed Description Of The Preferred Embodiment
[0016] Referring to the drawings in greater detail, and first to Figure 1, a cooling tower,
generally designated 10, is generally shown to exemplify one use of the refractory
brick wall system of the invention and to generally illustrate locations for certain
features of the system. Such a cooling tower might be used as a gas conditioning/cooling
tower in a waste incineration system, either for household, commercial or hazardous
applications. However, as stated above, this depiction is for illustration purposes
because the refractory brick wall system of the invention can be installed in vertical,
horizontal or oblique applications; in both fixed, stationary or transportable applications;
and in existing quench and cooling chamber applications, as well as a wide variety
of other refractory wall uses.
[0017] Cooling tower 10 includes an inlet duct 12 for incoming gas flow, as indicated by
arrows 14, whereby the gas will flow downwardly through the tower, in the direction
of arrow 16. The gas may flow out of the bottom of the tower, or one or more cross
over ducts 18 may be provided near the bottom of the tower leading to other such units.
An access door 20 may be provided to gain access to the interior of the tower near
the top thereof. A second access door 22 may be provided near the bottom of the tower
and covered by a castable refractory closure 24. As is sometimes common, spray nozzles
26 may project through the tower near the top thereof.
[0018] Generally, the invention contemplates a refractory brick wall system which includes
an outside casing 28 of steel or other like appropriate material and a brick wall
30 formed of a plurality of refractory bricks laid up in a pattern on the inside of
steel casing 28. In order to facilitate the illustration of Figure 1, the majority
of brick wall 30 is simply shown sectioned in the vertical sectional depiction of
the figure However, it can be seen that areas, generally designated 32, near the top
of the tower have been completed to show a pattern of refractory bricks which, if
the depiction was completed, would cover substantially the entire interior surface
of tower 10 (i.e. the surface exposed to the gas flow. Only sections 32 have been
magnified in order to facilitate the illustration of other components of the tower
and certain features of the invention as described hereinafter.
[0019] Turning now to Figure 2, a fragmented section of steel casing 28 is shown with a
portion of brick wall 30 and its plurality of bricks laid up in a pattern on the inside
of the casing. As will be more clear in the description of Figures 4-9, it can be
seen in Figure 2 that there are more than one species of brick. In the exemplary embodiment
of the invention, two species of brick are used and generally designated 34 and 36.
Suffice it to say at this point, it can be seen, for instance, in the top row of bricks
shown in Figure 2, that the inner faces of bricks 34 are wider than the inner faces
of bricks 36. The reasons for this will be set forth in greater detail hereinafter.
However, it can be seen that the bricks are laid up in horizontal rows at horizontal
joints 38.
[0020] One feature of the invention is the provision of shelf means, generally designated
40, fixed to the inside of casing 28 at vertically spaced intervals to provide support
for the bricks in vertical sections thereof. Referring briefly back to Figure 1, shelf
means 40 are shown vertically spaced substantially the entire height of cooling tower
10.
[0021] More particularly, referring back to Figure 2, shelf means 40 are in the form of
a plurality of horizontal shelf members, such as of steel or the like, having L-shapes
with one leg 42 of the L fixed to casing 28, as by welding, and the other leg 44 of
the L projecting inwardly from the casing and disposed in a horizontal joint 38 between
horizontal rows of bricks 34,36. This shelf means sectionalizes the interior wall
structure of tower 10 (or other appropriate wall construction) and allows for ease
of repair of the wall system for replacement of a certain number of bricks without
affecting the entire wall system. The shelving relieves excess refractory weight build-up
from slagging, accumulating on the inside of the wall construction and, thereby, allows
higher walls to be constructed within given parameters of the other components of
the system. The shelving also virtually eliminates stresses from refractory thermal
growth of the wall.
[0022] Another feature of the refractory brick wall system of the invention is the provision
of tie-back means for securing bricks 34,36 to casing 28, while allowing for relative
horizontal and relative vertical movement between the bricks and the casing. Before
proceeding with a detailed description of the tie-back means, it should be understood
that all of the bricks are interlocked on all sides, tops and bottoms, again as described
hereinafter in relation to Figures 4-9.
[0023] More particularly, the tie-back means include a plurality of tie-back devices, generally
designated 46, as best seen in Figure 2. Each tie-back device includes an angle bracket
48 which defines angled legs, the distal edges of which are fixed, as by welding,
to the inside of casing 28. In essence, these angle brackets define vertically oriented
slots or recesses. Although all of bricks 34 are fabricated identically, selected
ones of this species of brick are shown in Figure 2 with an "X" across the inner face
thereof. This simply is to show in Figure 2 the various locations of the tie back
devices 46 behind the bricks. Each brick 34 is formed with a vertically oriented recess
50 opening at the top thereof. Therefore, it can be seen that brackets 48 and brick
recesses 50 define horizontally spaced, vertically and upwardly opening recess means.
[0024] Tie-back devices 46 include arm members 52 which are generally U-shaped to define
legs 52a and 52b for positioning in brackets 48 and brick recesses 50, respectively.
Therefore, it can be seen that the complementary function of brackets 48 and recesses
50 in conjunction with the legs 52a,52b of arms 52 provide for both horizontal pivoting
(with the legs 52a,52b defining pivot axes) as well as vertical sliding between the
interlocked brick wall and casing 28. This allows for both horizontal and vertical
growth freedom of movement of the brick wall during heat-up and allows for thermal
expansion and contraction of the refractory brick wall while still tying the entire
wall back to fixed casing 28.
[0025] Referring to Figures 10 and 11, just the brackets 48 of tie-back devices 46 are shown
on the inside of casing 28. Figure 10 shows that the tie-back devices are spaced horizontally
or angularly in any horizontal given row thereof a distance as indicated by angle-designation
arrows 54. Figure 11 shows that the tie-back devices are disposed in vertically spaced,
horizontal rows about the interior of casing 28. In addition, it can be seen that
the individual tie-back devices in one row are horizontally offset relative to the
tie-back devices in an adjacent row, as indicated by phantom lines 56. The offset
rows give even distribution of structural load back to the steel casing. This staggering
also reduces the required number of tie-back devices without significantly decreasing
the structural strength of the construction. It also enhances a unified effect on
the overall refractory brick wall to hold the bricks together in view of the interlocked
design of the bricks themselves.
[0026] To this end, Figure 3 shows a pair of tie-back devices 46 in conjunction with a plurality
of surrounding bricks 34,36. It can be seen that, although a tie-back device is not
used with every brick 34, the combination of the tie-back devices and the interlocking
nature of bricks 34 and 36 cooperate to tie the entire brick wall construction back
to casing 28.
[0027] Figures 4-6 show the configuration of each of bricks 34, i.e. one species of brick.
More particularly, each brick 34 has an inner face 58 (i.e. facing the inside of the
tower), an outer face 60 and sides defined by peripheral rings 62 defining grooves
or recesses 64. Inner and outer faces 58 and 60, respectively, are flat and generally
parallel. Recess 50 for receiving leg 52b of one of the tie-back arms 52 also are
shown in these views. In particular, Figure 6 shows that recess 50 actually has a
step portion 50a which is recessed below the top of the brick so that the arm 52
can be recessed below the joint between the brick and a mating brick. In a cooling
tower application, inner and outer faces 58 and 60 would be generally vertically
oriented. Figure 6 also shows that the top and bottom of brick 34 are angled downwardly
toward inner face 58 oblique to the vertical orientation of the inner surface of the
wall construction, i.e. the vertical axis of tower 10, for instance. This minimizes
condensation and gas penetration through the joints between the refractory bricks,
particularly at the horizontal joints. As is known, liquids will seek their lowest
levels which, in this configuration, would be the center of the cooling tower.
[0028] Figures 7-9 show the configuration of the second species of brick, generally designated
36. Each brick in this species has an inner face 70, an outer face 72 and side faces
defined by rings 74 forming grooves 76. Although it should be clear from comparing
Figure 7 with Figure 4, Figure 3 best shows that the ring and groove configuration
of bricks 34 and 36 are such as to be mirror images of each other. In other words,
the rings of bricks 34 mate with the grooves of bricks 36 to provide a substantially
airtight mating between adjacent bricks. Of course, as stated at times above, this
also provides for absolute interlocking of the two species of bricks throughout the
entire brick wall construction.
[0029] These configurations of bricks 34, 36 provide the total tile with a grooved and ribbed
affect. This allows an extra measure of interlocking, to insure that there is no moisture
or gas penetration back to the casing. A further feature of the invention is to include
filler means 80 (Figs. 2 and 3) of a homogeneous lightweight refractory material which
can be poured and cast between the inner faces 60 and 72 of bricks 36 and 34, respectively,
and outer steel casing 28. This filler material provides improved insulating value
for resistance to heat passage through the construction. It reduces refractory cold
face temperature, and it also is a barrier to gas penetration to the steel casing
28 as with the bricks themselves, as well as the mortar (not shown) between the bricks,
this mortar or filler material experiences expansion and contraction in all directions.
Internal recesses 50 insure an allowance for vertical and horizontal growth freedom
(i.e., expansion and contraction).
[0030] Lastly, at a joint 82 (Fig. 2) formed by legs 44 of shelf means 40, a mortar is used
to fill the joint. For instance, in a "wet" application such as a spray chamber, an
acid resistant mortar is used to seal off the joint and to keep any moisture from
entering the joint. In a high temperature application, such as a chemical waste incinerator,
a chronic fiber may be used in the joint, packed tight to prevent gases from penetrating
into the joint.
[0031] It will be understood that the invention may be embodied in other specific forms
without departing from the spirit or central characteristics thereof. The present
examples and embodiments, therefore, are to be considered in all respects as illustrative
and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein.
1. A refractory brick wall system for towers and the like comprising:
outside casing means (28);
a plurality of bricks (34,36) laid up in a pattern on the inside of the casing means;
and
tie-back means (46) for securing the bricks to the casing means, including means for
allowing relative horizontal movement between the bricks and the casing means.
2. The refractory brick wall system of claim 1 wherein said tie-back means include
a plurality of spaced tie-back devices (46) arranged in vertically spaced horizontal
rows.
3. The refractory brick wall system of claim 2 wherein said tie-back devices (46)
in one row are horizontally offset relative to the tie-back devices in an adjacent
row.
4. The refractory brick wall system of claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein said tie-back means
(46) include means (48,52A) for allowing relative vertical movement between the bricks
and the casing means.
5. The refractory brick wall system of claim 4 wherein said tie-back means (46) include
bracket means (48) fixed to the casing means (28) and slide arm means (52) connected
to the bricks and vertically slidably received in the bracket means (48).
6. The refractory brick wall system of any preceding claim, wherein said tie-back
means include pivot means (52A,52B) between the bricks and the casing means (28).
7. The refractory brick wall system of claim 6 wherein said pivot means include bracket
means (48) fixed to the casing means (28) and pivot arm means (52) connected to the
bricks and pivotally mounted on the bracket means (48).
8. The refractory brick wall system of claim 7 wherein said pivot arm means (52) are
generally U-shaped with one leg (52B) of the U disposed in a recess in the bricks
and another leg (52A) of the U defining with the bracket means (48) the pivot axis
of the pivot means.
9. A refractory brick wall system according to any preceding claim, characterized
in that shelf means (40) are fixed to the inside of the casing means (28) at vertically
spaced intervals to provide support for the bricks in vertical sections thereof.
10. In a refractory brick wall system for towers and the like, a plurality of interlocking
bricks of at least two species (34,36) having peripheral rings (62,74) on the sides
thereof, the rings of one species of brick defining a shape that is a mirror image
of the shape of a brick of the other species to provide interlocking means between
the bricks when laid up side-by-side.
11. The refractory brick wall system of claim 10 wherein each brick has an inner face
(58,70), an outer face (60,72) and side faces defining said rings (62,74).
12. The refractory brick wall system of claim 11 wherein at least said inner faces
(58,70) of the bricks are flat.
13. The refractory brick wall system of claim 11 or 12, wherein the inner face (70)
of one of said species (36) of brick is narrower than the inner face (58) of the other
of said species (34) of brick, the inner face (58) of the other species of brick being
defined by one of said peripheral rings (34).
14. The refractory brick wall system of claim 11, 12 or 13, wherein the inner and
outer faces (58,70;60,72) of the bricks are in generally parallel planes, with side
faces of the bricks being oblique to the inner and outer faces.