BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
[0001] This invention relates to melt adhesive compositions especially useful in adhering
polyolefin bodies to themselves, to other polyolefin bodies and to other non-polyolefinic
bodies comprising a blend of (1) an amorphous polypropylene (amorphous polyalphaolefins),
(2) a selectively hydrogenated monoalkenyl arene/conjugated diene block copolymer
of linear or radial configuration and (3) a tackifier.
2. Description of the Prior Art
[0002] The preparation of adhesives containing amorphous polypropylene and block copolymers
containing unsaturated mid block copolymers, for example, polystyrene-polybutadiene-polystyrene
(S-B-S) or polystyrene-polyisoprene-polystyrene (S-I-S), tackifier and a rubber-extending
oil is known, as evidenced, for example, in U.S. Patent No. 3,862,068 to Russell.
Such adhesives have limited elevated temperature melt stability, limited resistance
to O₂ and UV, but, most important, exhibit limited performance characteristics on
untreated polyolefin surfaces wherein high bond integrity and durability are also
required. U.S. Patent No. 3,686,107 to Russsell also discloses similar compositions
having similarly undesired characteristics noted above. St. Clair et al in U.S. Patent
No. 4,296,008 prepares a sealant composition containing a selectively hydrogenated
S-B-S and S-I-S block copolymer in combination with tackifying resins, plasticizers
and solvents. U.S. Patent No. 4,138,378 to Doss also discloses a sealant formulation
containing selectively hydrogenated block copolymers, a polyalkene plasticizer, a
tackifying resin and a filler. St. Clair et al in U.S. Patent No. 4,286,077 disclose
the use of selectively hydrogenated block copolymers in combination with a tackifier
and a plasticizer to obtain a pressure sensitive adhesive. Additional variants in
adhesive preparations involving the use of hydrogenated block copolymers are described
in U.S. Patent No. 4,151,057 to St. Clair et al.
[0003] The patents discussed above are examplary of the prior art involving the utilization
of various types of block copolymers in the preparation of adhesives and sealants.
Obviously, none of these references discloses the use of an amorphous polypropylene
in combination with selectively hydrogenated monoalkenyl arene/conjugated diene block
copolymers and tackifiers. We have discovered that such combinations containing an
amorphous polypropylene exhibit excellent adhesivity to untreated polyolefins and
are useful in various plastic fabrication and assemblies involving such surfaces.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0004] We have found that when a selectively hydrogenated monoalkenyl arene/conjugated diene
block copolymer, such as a selectively hydrogenated styrene-butadiene-styrene or styrene-isoprene-styrene
copolymer, is combined with an amorphous polypropylene and a tackifier, the resultant
adhesive exhibits an unexpected and superior adhesivity to polyolefin surfaces, such
as polyethylene and polypropylene. These adhesives have a special utility in the fabrication
of a variety of articles, for example, in the preparation of packaging films, closures
or wax-coated paper or paperboard boxes, assembly of injection molded objects and
containers, some or all of which will require the necessity for an adhesive use to
provide the desired fabricated products for various articles of commerce. Thus, it
is absolutely necessary that the adhesive used exhibit excellent adhesivity to such
surfaces to hold the assemblies together through their lifetime of use. Our present
adhesives, moreover, have an excellent affinity to untreated polyolefin surfaces.
It is well known in the art that polyolefins can be rendered adhesive receptive only
after appropriate surface treatment is employed, such as via the use of corona discharge,
flame or via plasma. Such approach will obviously require an additional step to impart
surface bondability to polyolefins, and hence, any approach to the design of an adhesive
which will overcome this additional, and costly, step, that is, exhibit a direct affinity
to untreated polyolefin surfaces, will be of much interest and useful to industry.
[0005] The amorphous (atactic) polypropylenes, including amorphous polyalphaolefins, and
combinations thereof, used herein to prepare the novel melt adhesive compositions
claimed herein will show varying extent of solubility in hydrocarbon solvents, such
as pentene, hexane, etc., have a crystallinity of less than about 10 weight per cent,
preferably less than about five weight percent and possess a molecular weight in the
range of about 300 to about 50,000, preferably about 1000 to about 25,000. The method
used in preparing the amorphous polypropylene or amorphous polyalphaolefins and recovering
the same, has no effect on its utilization in the preparation of the novel melt adhesive
claimed herein. Thus, amorphous polypropylene formed as a byproduct in minor amounts
during the production of crystalline polypropylene (homo or copolymer resins) by the
polymerization of propylene in the presence of stereospecific catalysts by processes
disclosed, for example, in U.S. Patents Nos. 3,679,775 to Hagemeyer et al, 3,529,037
also to Hagemeyer et al and 3,900,694 to Jurrens can be used. On the other hand amorphous
polypropylene (amorphous polyalphaolefins) produced directly, that is, by intent,
without the production of crystalline copolymers of propylene and lower olefins, as
disclosed, for example, in U.S. Patents Nos. 3,923,758 to Carter et al, 3,954,697
to McConnell et al, 4,072,812 to McConnell et al, 4,072,813 to McConnell et al, 4,259,470
to Trotter et al, 4,309,522 to Dietrich et al and 4,317,897 to Herrmann et al can
also be used. While the amorphous polypropylenes (amorphous polyalphaolefins) used
herein can be homopolymers of propylene, it is within the purview of our invention
to use substantially amorphous products based on propylene copolymerized with olefins,
such as ethylene, butene, pentene, hexene, nonene, decene, etc., whether such products
have been obtained intentionally or as by-products. The latter copolymers are defined
herein as "amorphous polyalphaolefins". In the claimed invention herein, the term
"amorphous polypropylene" is intended to include the said "amorphous polyalphaolefins".
Such amorphous copolymers can have a melt viscosity in the range of about 200 to about
50,000, or even higher, cps at 375°F (190.5°C) (ASTM D 3236). These copolymers will
contain propylene in an amount ranging from about 25 to about 99.5, or even higher,
weight percent, generally from about 50 to about 99.5, or even higher, weight percent,
with the remainder being one or more of the other olefins identified above. The amorphous
polyalphaolefins useful herein are further described, for example, in U.S. Patents
Nos. 4,022,728 to Trotter et al, 4,120,916 to Meyer et al, 4,210,570 to Trotter et
al, 4,264,756 to Trotter et al and 4,288,358 to Trotter et al.
[0006] The block copolymer used herein to prepare the novel melt adhesive composition claimed
herein can be either a multiblock copolymer containing the structure A-B, the structure
A-B-A₁ or the radial structure (A-B)
xY, or combinations thereof, wherein A and A₁, the same or different, are alkenyl arene
polymer blocks, preferably monoalkenyl arene polymer blocks, B is a block containing
a hydrogenated conjugated diene polymer, preferably a block consisting essentially
of a hydrogenated conjugated diene polymer, Y represents a residue of a polyfunctional
coupling agent or a polyfunctional initiator and x is a number having a value greater
than 2, preferably from 3 to 4. The geometrical structure of the block copolymers
used herein is not critical, as long as the A, A₁ and B components thereof fall within
the above definition, and therefore the structure can be either linear (including
tapered), radial or branched. Each of the blocks A, A₁ and B can be substantially
homopolymer or random copolymer blocks, as long as at least about 80 weight percent,
preferably at least about 75 weight percent of each block predominates in at least
one class of the monomers characterizing the blocks and the A and A₁ blocks individually
predominate in alkenyl arenes and Block B individually predominates in a hydrogenated
conjugated diene.
[0007] The term "alkenyl arene" can be any alkenyl arene having from 8 to 18 carbon atoms,
preferably from 8 to 9 carbon atoms, and can include styrene itself and its analogs
and homologs, for example, alpha methyl styrene and ring-substituted styrene, such
as, ring alkylated styrenes, for example, 3-methyl styrene, 4-methyl styrene, 4-n-propyl
styrene, and other alkenyl arenes, such as 1-vinyl naphthalene, 2-vinyl naphthalene
and the like. Styrene and alpha methyl styrene are preferred, with styrene being especially
preferred.
[0008] The term "conjugated diene" is intended to include a conjugated diene having from
4 to 8 carbon atoms, preferably from 4 to 6 carbon atoms, such as 1,3-butadiene, isoprene,
1,3-pentadiene, 2,4-hexadiene, 3-ethyl-1,3-pentadiene and the like and copolymers
of such conjugated dienes, provided that such copolymer is characterized by such conjugated
diene and such copolymer contains at least about 50 weight percent, preferably at
least about 75 weight percent, of such conjugated diene. When the block copolymers
defined above, A-B-A₁, A-B or (A-B)
xY, are selectively hydrogenated, for example following the procedure defined in U.S.
Patents Nos. 3,595,942 to Wald et al and 3,696,088 to DeVault, blocks A and A₁ are
substantially unaffected by the hydrogenation but at least about 75 weight percent,
generally all, of the conjugated diene polymer in block B is converted to the corresponding
hydrogenated species. Thus, when the block B is composed of polybutadiene the resulting
block is, or at least appears to be, a copolymer of ethylene and butene-1 (EB). When
block B is composed of isoprene, the resulting block is, or at least appears to be,
a copolymer of ethylene and propylene (EP).
[0009] Typical block copolymers that can be used include the following:
(1) polystyrene-hydrogenated polybutadiene-polystyrene,
(2) polystyrene-hydrogenated polyisoprene-polystyrene,
(3) poly(alphamethyl) styrene-hydrogenated polybutadiene-poly(alphamethyl) styrene,
(4) poly(alphamethyl) styrene-hydrogenated polyisoprene-poly(alphamethyl) styrene,
(5) polystyrene-hydrogenated polybutadiene,
(6) polystyrene-hydrogenated polyisoprene,
(7) poly(alphamethyl) styrene-hydrogenated polybutadiene,
(8) poly(alphamethyl) styrene-hydrogenated polyisoprene,
(9) polymers of the configuration (A-B)xY, wherein A represents polystyrene or poly(alphamethyl) styrene segments, B represents
a hydrogenated polybutadiene or polyisoprene segment, Y represents a residue of a
polyfunctional coupling agent or a polyfunctional initiator and x is a number having
a value greater than 2, preferably from 3 to 4,
(10) combinations of the above in various proportions, etc.
[0010] The average molecular weight of the individual polymer blocks A, A₁ and B can vary
over a wide range. The total average molecular weight of the alkenyl arene blocks
can be in the range of about 2000 to about 125,000, but preferably will be in the
range of about 5,000 to about 50,000. The selectively hydrogenated conjugated diene
polymer block will have an average molecular weight in the range of about 10,000 to
about 500,000 but preferably will be in the range of about 20,000 to about 300,000.
The block copolymers used herein will contain a total from about five to about 50
weight percent of the alkenyl arene block(s), preferably from about 10 to about 35
weight percent.
[0011] Examples of the block copolymers that can be used herein are further defined in U.S.
Patents Nos. 4,151,057, 4,286,077 and 4,296,008 to St. Clair et al, and in U.S. Patent
No. 4,138,378 to Doss discussed hereinabove.
[0012] The third necessary component in preparing the novel melt adhesive compositions claimed
herein is a hydrocarbon tackifier. Suitable for such use can be any hydrocarbon tackifier,
or combinations thereof, generally used, or suitable for use, in the preparation of
hot melt adhesives. A particularly suitable tackifier can be obtained from commercially
available hydrocarbon resins resulting from the polymerization of monomers consisting
of olefins, cycloolefins and diolefins, for example, residual byproduct monomers resulting
from the manufacture of isoprene. Such tackifiers are described, for example, in U.S.
Patent Nos. 3,932,330 to Lakshmanan, 4,022,728 to Trotter et al and 4,072,735 to Ardemagni.
Such petroleum-derived hydrocarbon resins are sometimes also referred to as synthetic
terpene resins. Other types of tackifiers also suitable for use herein include products
obtained from cyclopentadiene and dicyclopentadiene polymerization and subsequent
hydrogenation, conventional terpene resins and modified terpene resins obtained as
a result of the polymerization of such terpene-derived monomers, such as alpha- and
beta-pinene, dipentene and limonene, rosin and rosin esters, hydrogenated rosin products
and disproportionated rosin products. Petroleum hydrocarbon resins that have been
post hydrogenated to yield a more thermally stable resin are especially preferred.
The tackifiers used to prepare the novel melt adhesive compositions claimed herein
will typically exhibit a ring and ball softening point (ASTM E 28) in the range of
about 10
o to about 150
o, preferably about 25
o to about 125
oC.
[0013] The three components required to obtain the novel melt adhesives claimed herein can
be present in the amounts defined below in Table I.
TABLE I
|
Weight Percent |
|
Broad Range |
Preferred Range |
(1) Amorphous Polypropylene |
5 - 95 |
30-90 |
(2) Selectively Hydrogenated Block Copolymer |
2.5 - 40 |
5-20 |
(3) Hydrocarbon Tackifier |
2.5 - 55 |
5-50 |
[0014] In an embodiment herein our melt adhesives can have also incorporated therein isotactic
polypropylene, ethylene-propylene copolymers, homo and copolymers from butene-1, paraffin
and microcrystalline waxes, Fischer-Tropsch waxes, low molecular weight polybutenes,
polyisobutylene, low molecular weight (700 to 25,000) polyethylene, conventional low
density polyethylene, process oils, etc., in an amount upto about 40 weight percent,
generally upto about 25 weight percent, based on the final adhesive composition.
[0015] Since hot melt adhesives tend to experience varying degrees of thermal exposure during
thermal processing and/or during application to the substrate, it is desirable to
incorporate therein one or more antioxidants in small amounts to inhibit thermal and/or
thermoxidative degradation. Several types of commercial products, predominantly of
the hindered phenol types, are available for this purpose to function as primary antioxidants.
A secondary antioxidant belonging to the general classification of thioesters and
phosphites can also be used in combination with the hindered phenols. Exemplary of
antioxidants suitable for use herein include tetrakis[methylene 3-(3′,5′-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)
propionate] methane;
2,2′-ethyldenebis(4,6-di-tertiary-butylphenol);
1,1-3-tris(2-methyl-4-hydroxy-5-t-butyl phenyl) butane; and 1,3,5-trimethyl-2,4,6-tris(3,5-tertiary-butyl-4-hydroxybenzyl)
benzene. Secondary antioxidants, such as dilauryithiodipropionate; pentaerythritol
tetrakis(beta-laurylthiopropionate) and various alkyl-, aryl-, di- and polyphosphites
and thiophosphites can also be employed in combination with appropriate hindered phenols.
Effective amounts of antioxidants that can be used can range from about 0.05 to about
five weight percent, preferably from about 0.1 to about 2.5 weight percent, based
on the weight of the final adhesive composition.
[0016] The preparation of the novel melt adhesive claimed herein is not critical and any
suitable method can be employed. In a preferred embodiment a mixing vessel is heated
to an elevated temperature, for example in the range of about 350
o to about 400
oF (162.8
o to 204.5
oC) and the amorphous polypropylene, tackifier and the antioxidant, if used, are added
thereto. The resulting mixture is allowed to soften under slow mixing to homogeniety.
At this juncture the block copolymer is added in small quantities to the melt with
continued mixing until the entire amount is added. Following this mixing is further
continued with homogeniety of the entire adhesive mass occurs. After this the product
is collected in a release line tray. The total mixing time is generally in the range
of about two to about four hours.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0017] The present invention relating to the novel hot melt adhesives claimed herein can
further be illustrated by the following. A number of compositions were prepared either
using an oil-heated Brabender mixing vessel having a compounding bowl with a capacity
of 450 milliliters or using a stainless steel beaker heated with a GLAS-COL mantle
with a capacity of 500 milliliters. Before beginning, the Brabender mixing vessel
was heated to a temperature ranging from 350
oF (176.7
oC) to 380
oF (193.3
oC). The amorphous polypropylene, tackifier and antioxidant were allowed to soften
and were mixed at such temperature under slow mixing for 30 minutes. When the preparation
was carried out in a stainless steel beaker, sufficient amount of the amorphous polypropylene
and tackifier, along with sufficient antioxidant, were placed in the container and
the entire mass was slowly heated to the desired temperature. At the point of fluidity
of the melt, slow stirring commenced to bring the mass to homogeneity. In both mixing
approaches following homogenization, the block copolymer was slowly added in small
quantities under continuous mixing until the desired homogeneity of the mixture was
obtained. Total mixing time ranged from about two to about four hours. The mixed compositions
were then collected on a release line tray.
[0018] The thermal stabilities of the adhesive compositions that were prepared were determined
by exposing 8 to 10 grams quantities of a sample in a five-inch x one-inch test tube
to a temperature environment of 350
oF (176.7
oC) for 24 hours. At the end of the 24 hours, the composition was visually observed
for any separation stratification and loss in composition homogeneity. The ring and
ball softening points of the compositions were determined according to ASTM Procedure
E-28. The melt viscosities of the compositions were determined according to ASTM Procedure
D 3236. The Peel Adhesion Failure Temperature (PAFT) and Shear Adhesion Failure Temperature
(SAFT) were performed according to TAPPI Procedure T814-77; and the peel strength
values were determined according to ASTM Procedure D 1876.
[0019] A Slautterback "minisquirt" hot melt gun applicator was used to prepare the peel
strength, 180
o reverse peel strength. PAFT and SAFT specimens to test the hot melt adhesive compositions
of this invention. To determine peel strength values of these compositions, polyethylene
laminated test specimens were prepared by applying the molten hot melt adhesive compositions
at 350°F (176.7
oC) to a 4-mil (one-inch by six-inch) high density polyethylene film as a continuous
strip one inch wide along the film of 2 1/2-inch length, and then another 4-mil high
density polyethylene film of the same dimensions was placed on top of the film carrying
the strip of the hot melt adhesive composition. Enough contact pressure was applied
via a rubber roller to spread the adhesive and to bring the adhesive in intimate contact
with the surfaces. The laminates were then aged for a minimum of 24 hours prior to
testing. Three specimens for each composition were prepared and the bond strength
was measured by peeling at the glue line by means of a J. J. Lloyd Tensile Tester
at a peel rate of 50 millimeters per minute. The maximum force in grams necessary
to cause rupture of the bond was noted. The average of the three such determinations
was recorded.
[0020] To obtain the 180 degrees reverse peel strength values, three-mil Mylar film/180-mil
high density polyethylene and three-mil Mylar film/120-mil polypropylene laminated
test specimens were prepared by applying the molten hot melt adhesive composition
at 350
oF (176.7C) to either 180 mil (one-inch by six-inch) high density polyethylene substrate
or 120 mil (one-inch by six-inch) polypropylene substrate as a continuous strip one-inch
wide along the substrate length and then a 3-mil (one-inch by 12-inch) strip of Mylar
film was placed on top of the substrate carrying the strip of the hot melt adhesive
composition. Three assemblies of each were prepared for each adhesive valuation. Following
this procedure enough contact pressure was applied via a rubber roller to spread the
adhesive evenly and to bring the adhesive in intimate contact with each of the surfaces.
The laminates were then aged for 24 hours prior to testing. Testing procedures were
the same as for the polyethylene specimens.
[0021] To determine Peel Adhesion Failure Temperature (PAFT) and Shear Adhesion Failure
Temperature (SAFT) values of the hot melt adhesive compositions, 78 pound (one-inch
by six-inch) kraft laminated test paper was used by applying each of the compositions
to the kraft strip by means of a Slautterback "minisquirt" hot melt applicator. The
hot melt adhesive compositions were applied at 350
oF (176.7
oC) to the kraft paper as a continuous coating of one-inch by 2 1/2-inch area of the
kraft substrate for PAFT performance and of one-inch by one-inch areas of the kraft
substrates for SAFT performance. Then another 78 pound kraft paper strip of the same
dimension was placed on top or positioned longitudinally on a kraft paper carrying
the coating of the hot melt adhesive compositions. Sufficient contact pressure was
then applied to bring the adhesive into intimate contact with the surfaces. The laminates
were then aged for 24 hours prior to testing. Two or three specimens for each composition
were prepared. The test was carried out by exposing the assemblies in an oven conditioned
at 100
oF (37.8
oC). The specimens were suspended at one end in the oven to a suitable device (a paper
clip), while to the other end either a 100-gram load (PAFT) test) or a 500-gram load
(SAFT test) were attached. From this point on, the temperature of the oven was increased
programmatically at the rate of 10
oF (5.5
oC) every 15 minutes until the failure temperature was reached. The average failure
temperature was then recorded.
[0022] The components used in the preparation of the adhesive compositions are identified
below in Table II.

[0023] Data obtained in a series of runs are set forth below in Table III.
TABLE III
BASE RUNS |
Run # |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
PARTS BY WEIGHT, GRAMS |
APP, K-TAC 100B |
100.00 |
85.00 |
50.00 |
53.75 |
75.00 |
- |
- |
50.00 |
Shellwax 700 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
47.50 |
- |
- |
Kraton GX-1657 |
- |
15.00 |
15.00 |
7.50 |
7.50 |
5.00 |
9.52 |
- |
Escorez 5380 |
- |
- |
35.00 |
38.75 |
17.50 |
47.50 |
90.48 |
- |
Wingtack 10 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
50.00 |
Isonox 129 / DLTDP (1:1) |
0.60 |
0.6 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
Total |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Viscosity, cps @ 350°F |
2000 |
10500 |
9350 |
3300 |
4300 |
40 |
1400 |
275 |
R&B,°C |
154 |
156 |
139 |
149 |
152 |
89 |
93 |
142 |
Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peel Strength, g/in, 50 mm/min |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HDPE (4 mil)/ HDPE (4 mil) |
950 |
1045 |
4400 |
3180 |
1630 |
No Adh |
No Adh. |
330 |
Mylar(3 mil)/PP (120 mil) |
1500 |
160 |
4090 |
6240 |
2880 |
No Adh |
No Adh. |
363 |
[0024] An inspection of the data in Table III shows that when amorphous polypropylene is
used alone as an adhesive in Run No. 1 some level of adhesion is obtained to high
density polyethylene (HDPE) and polypropylene (PP) surfaces. When amorphous polypropylene
was combined solely with a selectively hydrogenated block copolymer composed of styrene
and ethylene butylene polymer blocks (Kraton GX-1657) in Run No. 2, no appreciable
improvement in adhesion to a HDPE surface was achieved and adhesion to polypropylene
was significantly reduced. When the same selectively hydrogenated block copolymer
was combined solely with a tackifier in Run No. 7 no adhesion at all was obtained.
When in Run No. 8 amorphous polypropylene was combined solely with a tackifier, the
results were inferior to Run No. 1. The use of Kraton GX-1657, a wax and a tackifier,
but no amorphous polypropylene, in Run No. 6 resulted in a composition exhibiting
no adhesivity. Note, however, that in Runs Nos. 3, 4 and 5, wherein an adhesive containing
the selectively hydrogenated block copolymer Kraton GX-1657, amorphous polypropylene
and a tackifier was tested, unexpected and dramatic improvements in adhesive performance
was obtained in both HDPE and PP surfaces.
[0025] An additional series of runs was made and the data obtained are set forth below in
Table IV.
TABLE IV
Effect Of Component Levels On Blend Performance |
RUN # |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
|
PARTS BY WEIGHT, GRAMS |
APP, K-TAC 100B |
40.00 |
60.10 |
73.00 |
20.00 |
45.00 |
47.50 |
Kraton GX-1657 |
20.00 |
13.30 |
9.00 |
40.00 |
10.00 |
5.00 |
Escorez 5380 |
40.00 |
26.60 |
18.00 |
40.00 |
45.00 |
47.50 |
Isonox 129/ DLTDP (1:1) |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
Total |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Viscosity, cps @ 350°F |
14500 |
7500 |
4950 |
85500 |
3650 |
1650 |
R&B,°C |
110 |
152 |
153 |
124 |
134 |
148 |
Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peel Strength, g/in, 50 mm/min. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
HDPE (4 mil)/ HDPE (4 mil) |
5790 |
3970 |
2180 |
2720 |
6200 |
6265 |
Mylar(3 mil)/PP (120 mil) |
10430 |
4770 |
2970 |
3400 |
12260 |
9530 |
[0026] The data in Table IV clearly shows that a highly significant increase in adhesion
to both HDPE and PP surfaces is obtained even though the amounts of amorphous polypropylene,
selectively hydrogenated block copolymer and tackifier are varied over a wide range.
[0027] Still another series of runs was made and the data obtained are set forth below in
Table V.
TABLE V
Effect Of Tackifier Type On Blend Performance |
RUN # |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
|
PARTS BY WEIGHT, GRAMS |
APP, K-TAC 100B |
47.50 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
Kraton GX-1657 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
Piccotac 95 |
47.50 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Wingtac 10 |
- |
47.50 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Piccolyte A 115 |
- |
- |
47.50 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Piccolyte S 115 |
- |
- |
- |
47.50 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Piccolyte S 10 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
47.50 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Regalrez 1094 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
47.50 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Regalite 7070 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
47.50 |
- |
- |
- |
Foral AX |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
47.50 |
- |
- |
Foral B5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
47.50 |
- |
Escorez 5300 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
47.50 |
Isonox 129/ DLTDP (1:1) |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
Total |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Viscosity,cps @ 350°F |
1500 |
650 |
1700 |
2000 |
850 |
1550 |
1350 |
1050 |
1250 |
2500 |
R&B,°C |
151 |
145 |
147 |
150 |
147 |
148 |
148 |
147 |
148 |
150 |
Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peel Strength, g/in., 50mm/min. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HDPE(4 mil)/ HDPE(4 mil) |
5450 |
910 |
5450 |
5450 |
1040 |
5450 |
5450 |
4448 |
5943 |
2450 |
Mylar (3 mil)/ PP (120 mil) |
12710 |
1090 |
13170 |
14070 |
1410 |
13170 |
10900 |
6844 |
9662 |
7630 |
[0028] As seen from Table V, the adhesion obtained in each of Runs 15, 17, 18 and 20 to
24 is still extremely high when the amorphous polypropylene and the block copolymer
are combined with a variety of tackifiers. Although in Runs Nos. 16 and 19, the adhesivity
to HDPE and PP surfaces was low, about the same order as obtained in Runs Nos. 1 and
2, it should be pointed out that Runs Nos. 16 and 19 should be compared, however,
with Run No. 8 in showing that the presence of all three components, namely, amorphous
polypropylene, the block copolymer and a tackifier, must be present to obtain an improved
adhesivity. For example when approximately equal amounts of amorphous polypropylene
and a low softening point tackifier alone were used in the preparation of the adhesive
in Run No. 8, adhesivity to both HDPE and PP surfaces was extremely low. When, however,
in Runs 16 and 19, a small amount of the Kraton GX-1657 selectively hydrogenated block
copolymer was added to approximately equal amounts of amorphous polypropylene and
a low softening point tackifier, significantly improved adhesion to both HDPE and
PP was achieved in comparison to Run No. 8.
[0029] Yet another series of runs was made. The data obtained are set forth below in Table
VI.
TABLE VI
Effect Of Elastomer Type On Blend Performance |
RUN # |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
32 |
33 |
|
PARTS BY WEIGHT, GRAMS |
APP, K-TAC 100B |
- |
- |
- |
- |
60.10 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
60.10 |
50.00 |
APP, K-TAC 400 |
60.10 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
60.10 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Kraton D-1107 |
13.30 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Kraton D-1102 |
- |
5.00 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Kraton G-1650 |
- |
- |
5.00 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Kraton G-1652 |
- |
- |
- |
13.30 |
6.65 |
5.00 |
- |
- |
- |
Kraton GX-1657 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6.65 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Kraton GX-1726 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5.00 |
13.30 |
- |
Kraton G-1701 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
15.00 |
Escorez 5380 |
26.60 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
26.60 |
26.60 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
26.60 |
35.00 |
Isonox 129/ DLTDP (1:1) |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
Total |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Viscosity,cps @ 350°F |
11250 |
4150 |
7625 |
34000 |
7500 |
1450 |
950 |
4500 |
26500 |
R&B,°C |
153 |
150 |
153 |
157 |
153 |
144 |
150 |
152 |
151 |
Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peel Strength, g/in., 50mm/min. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HDPE(4 mil)/ HDPE (4 mil) |
1134 |
4876 |
5440 |
5217 |
5330 |
4083 |
4355 |
2540 |
1725 |
Mylar(3 mil)/ PP (120 mil) |
340 |
No Ad |
10206 |
6124 |
5443 |
6714 |
6079 |
3448 |
2590 |
[0030] The data in Table VI exemplify the critical need of combining the amorphous polypropylene
and tackifier with a selectively hydrogenated alkenyl arene/conjugated diene block
copolymer to obtain an adhesive having improved adhesivity to HDPE and PP surfaces.
In each of Runs Nos. 25 and 26, wherein the midblock isoprene and butadiene polymers
were not hydrogenated, poor results were obtained. However, in each of Runs Nos. 27
to 33, wherein various types of selectively hydrogenated elastomers of varying midblock
characteristics, styrene levels and molecular weights were used, excellent adhesivities
were obtained.
[0031] A further series of runs was made and the data obtained are set forth below in Table
VII.
TABLE VII
Influence Of APP Type On Blend Performance |
RUN # |
34 |
35 |
36 |
37 |
38 |
39 |
40 |
41 |
|
PARTS BY WEIGHT, GRAMS |
APP, K-Tac 100 |
47.50 |
- |
- |
- |
60.10 |
- |
- |
- |
APP, K-Tac 100 A |
- |
47.50 |
- |
- |
- |
60.10 |
- |
- |
APP, K-Tac 100D |
- |
- |
47.50 |
- |
- |
- |
60.10 |
- |
APP, K-Tac 400 |
- |
- |
- |
47.50 |
- |
- |
- |
60.10 |
Kraton GX-1657 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
13.30 |
13.30 |
13.30 |
13.30 |
Escorez 5380 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
26.60 |
26.60 |
26.60 |
26.60 |
Isonox 129/ DLTDP (1:1) |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
Total |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Viscosity,cps @ 350°F |
600 |
1150 |
2525 |
5550 |
3000 |
5000 |
9875 |
24250 |
R & B,°C |
143 |
140 |
146 |
152 |
135 |
148 |
152 |
157 |
Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peel Strength, g/in., 50mm/min. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HDPE(4 mil)/ HDPE (4 mil) |
5900 |
5680 |
5680 |
5444 |
4540 |
5220 |
5450 |
4430 |
Mylar(3 mil)/ PP (120 mil) |
6810 |
7720 |
8170 |
11386 |
4990 |
4990 |
5220 |
6360 |
[0032] Runs Nos. 34 to 41 in Table VII show that excellent results are obtained herein using
amorphous polypropylenes over a wide molecular weight range, that is, viscosity, while
varying the amounts of the components used.
[0033] An additional series of runs was made. The data obtained are set forth below in Table
VIII.
TABLE VIII
Influence Of Amorphous Polyalphaolefin Type On Blend Performance |
RUN # |
42 |
43 |
44 |
45 |
46 |
47 |
48 |
49 |
50 |
|
PARTS BY WEIGHT, GRAMS |
Vestoplast 508 |
47.50 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
47.50 |
Vestoplast 703 |
- |
47.50 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Vestoplast 608 |
- |
- |
47.50 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Vestoplast V3643 |
- |
- |
- |
47.50 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Eastobond M-5H |
- |
- |
- |
- |
47.50 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Eastobond M-5C |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
47.50 |
- |
- |
- |
Rextac B3815 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
47.50 |
- |
- |
Rextac B6835 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
47.50 |
- |
Kraton G 1657 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
Escorez 5380 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
47.50 |
- |
Regalrez 1094 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
47.50 |
Isonox 129/ DLTDP (1:1) |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
Total |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Viscosity,cps @ 350°F |
4300 |
2050 |
4850 |
4050 |
2150 |
2750 |
1650 |
2850 |
3900 |
R & B,°C |
95 |
63 |
145 |
109 |
142 |
98 |
132 |
116 |
84 |
Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peel Strength, g/in., 50mm/min. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HDPE(4 mil)/ HDPE (4 mil) |
4808 |
5715 |
4568 |
5262 |
5720 |
6360 |
4900 |
3630 |
6670 |
Mylar (3 mil)/ PP (120 mil) |
7893 |
11680 |
8392 |
9072 |
8400 |
7720 |
7945 |
4540 |
11800 |
[0034] Runs Nos. 42 to 50 in Table VIII show that excellent results are obtained when the
adhesive herein is prepared using various amorphous polyalphaolefins obtained from
the polymerization of propylene with various other alpha olefins in place of amorphous
polypropylene.
[0035] Obviously, many modifications and variations of the invention, as hereinabove set
forth, can be made without departing from the spirit and scope thereof and therefore
only such limitations should be imposed as are indicated in the appended claims.
1. A melt adhesive composition comprising an amorphous polypropylene, a selectively
hydrogenated monoalkenyl arene/ conjugated diene block copolymer and a tackifier.
2. The melt adhesive composition of claim 1 wherein said amorphous polypropylene is
obtained as a byproduct during the production of crystalline polypropylene.
3. The melt adhesive composition of claim 1 wherein said amorphous polypropylene is
obtained as a direct product of the polymerization of propylene without the formation
of crystalline polypropylene.
4. The melt adhesive composition of claim 1 wherein said amorphous polypropylene has
a crystallinity of less than about 10 weight percent and a molecular weight in the
range of about 300 to about 50,000.
5. The melt adhesive composition of claim 1 wherein said amorphous polypropylene has
a crystallinity of less than about five weight percent and a molecular weight in the
range of about 1000 to about 25,000.
6. The melt adhesive composition of claim 1 wherein said block copolymer contains
the structure A-B, A-B-A₁ or (A-B)xY, wherein A and A₁ are monoalkenyl arene polymer blocks, B is a block containing
a hydrogenated conjugated diene polymer, Y represents a residue of a polyfunctional
coupling agent or a polyfunctional initiator and x is a number having a value greater
than 2.
7. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein said block copolymer contains
the structure A-B.
8. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein said block copolymer contains
the structure A-B-A₁.
9. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein said block copolymer contains
the structure (A-B)xY.
10. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein each of said block A, A₁ and
B is substantially a homopolymer.
11. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein at least one of said blocks A
and A₁ is a styrene polymer.
12. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein at least one of said blocks A
and A₁ is an alpha methyl styrene polymer.
13. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein at least one of said blocks A
and A₁ is a ring substituted styrene polymer.
14. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein at least one of said blocks A
and A₁ is a ring alkylated styrene polymer.
15. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein said block B is an ethylene-butene-1
copolymer.
16. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein said block B is an ethylene-propylene
copolymer.
17. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein said blocks A and A₁ are styrene
polymers and B is an ethylene-butene-1 copolymer.
18. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein said blocks A and A₁ are styrene
polymers and B is an ethylene-propylene.
19. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein the total average molecular weight
range of the monoalkenyl arene polymer blocks is in the range of about 2000 to about
125,000.
20. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein the total average molecular weight
range of the monoalkenyl arene polymer blocks is in the range of about 5000 to about
50,000.
21. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein the average molecular weight
range of the selectively hydrogenated conjugated diene polymer block is in the range
of about 10,000 to about 500,000.
22. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein the average molecular weight
range of the selectively hydrogenated conjugated diene polymer block is in the range
of about 20,000 to about 300,000.
23. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein the total weight of the monoalkenyl
arene block(s) is in the range of about five to about 50 weight percent.
24. The melt adhesive composition of claim 6 wherein the total weight of the monoalkenyl
arene block(s) is in the range of about 10 to about 35 weight percent.
25. The melt adhesive composition of claim 1 wherein said hydrocarbon tackifier has
a ring and ball softening point in the range of about 10o to about 150o.
26. The melt adhesive composition of claim 1 wherein said hydrocarbon tackifier has
a ring and ball softening point in the range of about 25o to about 125o.
27. The melt adhesive composition of claim 1 wherein said amorphous polypropylene
has a crystallinity of less than about 10 weight percent and a molecular weight in
the range of about 300 to about 50,000, said block copolymers contains the structure
A-B, A-B-A₁ or (A-B)xY, wherein A and A₁ are monoalkenyl arene polymer blocks, B is a block containing
a hydrogenated conjugated diene polymer, Y represents a residue of a polyfunctional
coupling agent or a polyfunctional initiator and x is a number having a value greater
than 2, the total average molecular weight of said monoalkenyl arene blocks being
in the range of about 2000 to about 125,000 and the average molecular weight of said
selectively hydrogenated conjugated diene polymer block being in the range of about
10,000 to about 500,000, with the total weight of the monoalkenyl arene blocks being
in the range of about five to about 50 weight percent, and said hydrocarbon tackifier
has a ring and ball softening point in the range of about 10o to about 150oC.
28. The melt adhesive composition of claim 27 wherein said amorphous polypropylene
has a crystallinity of less than about five weight percent and a molecular weight
in the range of about 1000 to about 25,000, the total average molecular weight of
said monoalkenyl arene blocks are in the range of about 5000 to about 50,000, the
average molecular weight of said selectively hydrogenated conjugated diene polymer
block is in the range of about 20,000 to about 300,000, the total weight of the monoalkenyl
arene blocks are in the range of about 10 to about 35 weight percent and said hydrocarbon
tackifier has a ring and ball softening point in the range of about 25o to about 125oC.
29. The melt adhesive of claim 27 wherein said block copolymer contains the structure
A-B.
30. The melt adhesive of claim 27 wherein said block copolymer contains the structure
A-B-A₁.
31. The melt adhesive of claim 27 wherein said block copolymer contains the structure
(A-B)xY.
32. The melt adhesive of claim 28 wherein said block copolymer contains the structure
A-B.
33. The melt adhesive of claim 28 wherein said block copolymer contains the structure
A-B-A₁.
34. The melt adhesive of claim 28 wherein said block copolymer contains the structure
(A-B)xY.
35. The melt adhesive composition of claim 28 wherein said blocks A and A₁ are styrene
polymers and said block B is an ethylene-butene-1 copolymer.
36. The melt adhesive composition of claim 28 wherein said blocks A and A₁ are styrene
polymers and said block B is an ethylene-propylene copolymer.
37. The melt adhesive composition of claim 1 wherein said components are present in
the following amounts:
|
Weight Percent |
Amorphous Polypropylene |
5 - 95 |
Selectively Hydrogenated Block Copolymer |
2.5 - 40 |
Hydrocarbon Tackifier |
2.5 - 55 |
38. The melt adhesive composition of claim 1 wherein said components are present in
the following amounts:
|
Weight Percent |
Amorphous Polypropylene |
30 - 90 |
Selectively Hydrogenated Block Copolymer |
5 - 20 |
Hydrocarbon Tackifier |
5 - 50 |