BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to a coin-discriminating device capable of detecting
the presence or absence of serrations around the peripheral edge of coins and determining
the value and authenticity of a coin.
[0002] In order to determine the value and authenticity of coins, detections of material,
diameter, and other characteristics of the coin are generally performed. But such
methods have difficulty in discriminating between coins of similar material and diameter,
and often make mistakes. For example, since various coins such as the Korean 500-won
coin and the Hong Kong N1-dollar coin are extremely similar in material and diameter
to the Japanese 500-yen coin, it is difficult to discriminate between them.
[0003] However, these coins can be discriminated from one another by a method that detects
serrations around their peripheral edges, because the Japanese 500-yen coin has no
serrations around its peripheral edge whereas the Korean 500-won coin and the Hong
Kong N1-dollar coin both have serrations around their peripheral edges.
[0004] A conventional method of determining whether or not there are serrations around the
peripheral edge of a coin is described in, for example, Japanese Patent Laid-Open
59-17691 (1984). As shown in Fig. 10, a spot-shaped beam of light emitted from a light-emitting
device
a placed above a coin path is focussed onto the upper peripheral edge of a freely rotating
coin in the coin path, and light reflected therefrom is received by a light-receiving
device
b and is converted thereby into an electric signal. The waveform of the electric signal
is then shaped into a pulse signal, the pulses in the signal are counted each time
a coin passes, and the coin is determined to have serrations around its peripheral
edge if the number of pulses equals or exceeds a previously determined value.
[0005] However, although the Japanese 500-yen coin differs from other coins such as the
Korean 500-won coin and the Hong Kong N1-dollar coin in that it does not have serrations
around its peripheral edge whereas the other coins do, the Japanese 500-yen coin has
"500 ◇ NIPPON" engraved around its peripheral edge. This causes a problem in that,
when the spot-shaped beam of light is irradiated onto this engraved portion, a signal
similar to that obtained from a serrated edge is detected, so the inscription is mistakenly
determined to be serrations and the coin is incorrectly identified.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a coin-discriminating
device that clearly discriminates between serrations and engraving, and that can determine
whether or not a coin has serrations around its peripheral edge.
[0007] The coin-discriminating device of the present invention is provided with a light-emitting
means that irradiates a slit-shaped beam of light onto serrations on the peripheral
edge of a coin on one side of a coin path that conveys coins, and a light-receiving
means that receives light reflected from the coin. The slit-shaped beam of light is
irradiated on the coin as it moves along the coin path. This slit-shaped beam of light
irradiated onto the coin is reflected by the peripheral edge of the coin and is received
by the light-receiving means as reflected light. A detection signal from the light-receiving
means is used as the basis of a determination as to whether or not the peripheral
edge of the coin has serrations.
[0008] In other words, the light-emitting means irradiates a slit-shaped beam of light onto
the peripheral edge of the coin. Therefore, if, for example, the peripheral edge of
the coin has an engraved inscription, the inscription covers only a small portion
of the entire reflective surface, so the quantity of light reflected by the inscription
varies only a little, and thus the effect on the detection signal of the light-receiving
means is relatively small. In contrast, if the coin has serrations around its peripheral
edge, the serrations extend over the entire reflective surface, so the quantity of
reflected light is greatly affected by the serrations, and so the detection signal
of the light-receiving means varies largely due to the serrations. Therefore, the
way in which the detection signal of the light-receiving means varies can be used
to clearly determine whether or not the coin has serrations, and also to discriminate
between an inscription and serrations.
[0009] Therefore, the present invention provides a coin-discriminating device that has
a simple structure and that can clearly determine whether or not a coin has serrations
around its peripheral edge, without incorrectly identifying an inscription as serrations.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0010] In the accompanying drawings,
Fig. 1 is a plan view of a coin path of an embodiment of the coin-discriminating device
of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a side view thereof;
Fig. 3 is a block diagram thereof;
Fig. 4A is a perspective view of a state in which a slit-shaped beam of light irradiates
onto a coin with serrations;
Fig. 4B is a perspective view of a state in which a slit-shaped beam of light irradiates
onto a coin that does not have serrations but that does have an engraved inscription;
Figs. 5A, 5B, and 5C are waveform diagrams obtained in a case in which a coin has
serrations;
Figs. 6A, 6B, and 6C are waveforms diagrams obtained in a case in which a coin does
not have serrations;
Fig. 7 is a plan view of an entrance portion of a coin path;
Fig. 8 is a block diagram of another embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 9 is a waveform diagram; and
Fig. 10 is a perspective view of a conventional device in a state in which a spot-shaped
beam of light irradiates onto a coin that does not have serrations but that does have
an engraved inscription.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0011] In an embodiment of the coin-discriminating device of the present invention shown
in Figs. 1 and 2, a path base plate 2 provided in a coin path 1 is provided on either
side thereof in the widthwise direction of the path with guides 3 and 4 that are in
contact with the peripheral edge of a coin C and that regulate the movement of the
coin C, and a conveyor means 5 is provided above the path base plate 2. The conveyor
means 5 has a conveyor belt 8 made of, for example, rubber, stretched so as to rotate
about pulleys 6 and 7, the conveyor belt 8 pressing against the upper surface of the
coin C entering along one of the guides 3 at an entrance portion of the coin path
1, and the pressure of the conveyor belt 8 moving the coin C along the guide 3 while
ensuring that the coin C is unable to freely rotate. Note that the movement of the
peripheral edge of the coin C along the guide 3 causes a certain amount of rotation
of the coin, but this rotation does not enter the range of free rotation.
[0012] The outer side of the guide 3 is provided with a light-emitting and -receiving unit
13 comprising a light-emitting device 11, consisting of a light-emitting means such
as a light-emitting diode that emits a slit-shaped beam of light onto the peripheral
edge of the coin C, and a light-receiving device 12, consisting of a light- receiving
means such as a photodiode that receives light reflected from the peripheral edge
of the coin C and converts the reflected light into an electrical signal.
[0013] The light emitted from the light-emitting device 11 is passed through a slit-shaped
aperture 3a in the guide 3 in such a way that a slit-shaped beam of light is constantly
emitted into the coin path 1 against serrations in the peripheral surface of the coin
C. As shown in Figs. 1 and 2, when the coin C moving along the guide 3 passes the
side part of the light-emitting and -receiving unit 13, the slit-shaped beam of light
shines onto the peripheral edge of the coin C, light reflected from the peripheral
edge of the coin C passes through another aperture 3b in the guide 3 to irradiate
onto the light-receiving device 12, and the light-receiving device 12 converts the
light into an electrical signal equivalent to the quantity of light received thereon.
Note that the irradiation of the slit-shaped beam of light onto the peripheral edge
of the coin C could either be over the entire width of the coin's edge, or over only
a portion thereof.
[0014] A detector that is not shown in the figures is provided to detect the fact that the
coin C moving along the coin path 1 has passed the side portion of the light-emitting
and -receiving unit 13, and an output from this detector forms a reset signal SR that
will be described later.
[0015] In Figure 3, an integrating circuit 21 removes a noise component from a detection
signal input from the light-receiving device 12. Since this integrating circuit 21
removes noise component using smoothing function thereof, a smoothing circuit may
be used in place of the integrating circuit. A waveform shaping circuit 22 is constructed
from elements such as a comparator or a Schmitt trigger circuit, and converts an output
signal input from the integrating circuit 21 into a pulse signal. A counter 23 that
is one example of a determination means 24 counts the total number of pulses in the
pulse signal that is input from the waveform shaping circuit 22 to a clock input terminal
CK. If this total number equals or exceeds a fixed value, a determination signal s
is output from a carry output terminal CA, and the total number is reset to zero by
the reset signal SR input to a reset input terminal R.
[0016] The operation of the above embodiment of the present invention will now be described.
[0017] As the conveyor belt 8 of the conveyor means 5 rotates, the coin to be identified
is transferred along the coin path 1. The conveyor belt 8 presses against the upper
surface of the coin C that enters the entrance portion of the coin path 1 and moves
along one of the guides 3, and the coin C moves along in contact with the guide 3
while being restrained against free rotation by the pressure of the conveyor belt
8.
[0018] The slit-shaped beam of light that is constantly irradiated from the light-emitting
device 11 passes through the slit-shaped aperture 3a into the coin path 1, and, when
the coin C is moved by the conveyor belt 8 to the side of the light-emitting and -receiving
unit 13 along the guide 3, the slit-shaped beam of light irradiates onto the peripheral
edge of the coin C, the light reflected from the coin C passes through the aperture
3b in the guide 3 and enters the light-receiving device 12, and the light that enters
the light-receiving device 12 is converted into a signal corresponding to the quantity
of light.
[0019] If, as shown in Fig. 4A, the coin is one that has serrations around its peripheral
edge, such as a Korean 500-won coin, the quantity of light reflected by the serrations
varies widely. Therefore, a number of peak waveforms are generated in accordance with
the crests and troughs of the serrations in the detection signal output by the light-receiving
device 12 that receives the slit-shaped beam of reflected light, and the result is
a regular waveform with a large amplitude, as shown in Fig. 5A.
[0020] If, as shown in Fig. 4B, the coin is a Japanese 500-yen coin with no serrations
around its peripheral edge, the detection signal output by the light-receiving device
12 that has received the slit-shaped beam of reflected light should have just one
normal peak, as shown in Fig. 6A.
[0021] However, as previously mentioned, the Japanese 500-yen coin has the inscription:
"500 ◇ NIPPON" engraved around its peripheral edge, and this inscription can easily
affect the detection signal. In such a case, if the spot-shaped beam of light of the
conventional device is irradiated onto the edge of the coin to obtain a detection
signal, the quantity of light reflected by the inscription will vary widely in the
same way as when there are serrations around the edge (as shown in Fig. 5A). Therefore,
a detection signal of a waveform similar to that obtained from a coin with serrations
is generated, so the detection signal is greatly affected by the inscription. In contrast,
if a slit-shaped beam of light is irradiated onto the edge of the coin to obtain a
detection signal, however, the quantity of reflected light will vary slightly and
part of the peak waveform will change, but this peak waveform will be irregular and
of a small amplitude, as shown for example in Fig. 6A, so the detection signal will
be virtually unaffected thereby.
[0022] The integrating circuit 21 that inputs the detection signal from the light-receiving
device 12 removes noise from the waveform of the detection signal, as shown in Fig.
5B or Fig. 6B, then outputs it.
[0023] The waveform shaping circuit 22 inputs the signal output by the integrating circuit
21, converts this output signal into a pulse signal, as shown in Fig. 5C or Fig. 6C,
then outputs it. In general, if the coin has serrations, a pulse signal of at least
five pulses is obtained, as shown in Fig. 5C; on the other hand, if the coin does
not have serrations, a pulse signal of about one or two pulses is obtained, as shown
in Fig. 6C.
[0024] The counter 23 inputs the pulse signal from the waveform shaping circuit 22 through
the clock input terminal CK, counts the pulses in the pulse signal, and, if the number
of pulses equals or exceeds a fixed value (for example, 5 pulses), it outputs the
determination signal S from the carry output terminal CA. In other words, if the coin
has serrations, the number of pulses in the pulse signal exceeds the fixed value,
so the determination signal S is output from the carry output terminal CA. Conversely,
if the coin does not have serrations, the number of pulses in the pulse signal does
not exceed the fixed value, and, at the point at which the coin moving along the coin
path 1 passed over the side of the light-emitting and -receiving unit 13, the number
of pulses is reset to 0 by the input of the reset signal SR to the reset input terminal
R.
[0025] If the determination signal S is output from the counter 23, the coin is determined
to have serrations. On the other hand, if the determination signal S is not output
from the counter 23, the coin is determined to have no serrations.
[0026] Note that, since the presence or absence of serrations is determined as the coin
C being conveyed along the coin path 1 moves along the guide 3, and the slit-shaped
beam of light is emitted from and received by the guide 3 side of the coin path 1,
there is no particular need to adjust the mechanism in accordance with the diameter
of the coin, so the coin-discriminating device of the present invention can be used
for discriminating between metal coins of different diameters.
[0027] Since the coin C cannot rotate freely as it is being conveyed, the output signal
of the light-receiving device 12 is obtained in proportion to the speed of movement
alone of the coin and also to the distance between serrations around its peripheral
edge. In other words, it is not affected by rotation of the coin. Therefore, it is
easy for the device to discriminate between a component of the output signal due to
the presence of serrations and a noise component, regardless of how fast the coin
is moving, and the device can clearly determine whether or not the coin has serrations.
[0028] Note that one method of conveying a coin C along the coin path 1 while preventing
it from rotating freely could be a conveyor method in which the coin path 1 is placed
on a slant with the guide 3 side downward, with the conveyor belt 8 being employed
to convey the coin C while controlling it to prevent it from rotating.
[0029] A method of moving the coin C along the guide 3 of the coin path 1 may be as shown
in Fig. 7 in which, at a point at which each coin C is sent into the coin path 1 by
centrifugal force imparted by a circular rotating plate 31, it is controlled by the
conveyor belt 8 in such a manner that it does not freely rotate as it is impelled
to move along the guide 3 by the centrifugal force. In another method, rotating rollers
may be positioned at an angle inclined toward the guide 3 placed on the upper side
of the coin path 1, and the coin C is continuously pushed thereby toward the guide
3 as it is conveyed thereby toward the end of the coin path 1.
[0030] In the above embodiment, a slit-shaped beam of light is irradiated onto the peripheral
edge of a coin from a slit formed in the guide 3 that is a side surface of the coin
path 1, but the construction could be such that, instead of a slit being formed in
the guide 3, a specially prepared slit could be placed between the light-emitting
device 11 and the coin. In addition, the construction of the above embodiment in which
a slit placed between the light-emitting device 11 and the coin faces the serrations
could be replaced by a construction in which the slit is made larger and the light
is focussed through a lens, or any construction such that ultimately the light irradiated
onto the peripheral edge of the coin is aimed so as to strike the serrations.
[0031] In the above embodiment, the presence or absence of serrations is determined by whether
the determination signal S is output from the carry output terminal CA when the count
of the counter 23 acting as the determination means 24 has reached a fixed value,
but a comparator may be used as the determination means 24 and the presence or absence
of serrations could be determined by whether the count matches a set value.
[0032] For example, as shown in Fig. 8, the determination means 24 could be constructed
of a CPU 41, a ROM 42, and a RAM 43. In this case, the detection signal from the light-receiving
device 12 is sampled by a sample-and-hold circuit 44, the resultant sample data is
stored in the RAM 43, and the determination is based on the contents of the RAM 43.
More specifically, an amplitude detection means 41a of the CPU 41 could function in
such a way as to take the amplitude voltage (V₁, V₂, V₃, ..., V
n in Fig. 9) of each peak in the amplitude of the waveform from the light-receiving
device 12 that exceeds a specific voltage (for example, 1 V), summing these voltages

and determining whether or not the value obtained in this way is a specific value.
Another method could be a voltage difference calculus method that takes differences
between waveform peaks, calculates the degree to which the amplitude voltage of the
signal waveform varies, using the equation

and bases the determination on a comparison of this value with a predetermined value.
A repetition period detection means 41b of the CPU 41 may function in such a way as
to base the determination on an investigation of whether or not repetition periods
of each peak in the waveform (T₁, T₂, T₃, ..., T
n in Fig. 9) exceed a fixed value, or on a time difference calculus method that calculates
the degree of randomness in periods by determining whether or not a value obtained
from the equation

exceeds a specific value.
[0033] The determination may also be based on a combination of the determination method
of the above embodiment and any of the voltage summation method, voltage difference
calculus method, and time difference calculus method.