[0001] This invention generally relates to feedback operated burner controls, and is concerned
with an acoustical burner control system and method which operates by measuring the
aggregate intensity of the sounds generated by the combustion flame having a frequency
of over 30 kHz.
[0002] Burner controls that utilize a feedback mechanism which constantly monitors one or
more parameters indicative of the combustion products generated by the burner are
known in the prior art. Such systems generally include electrically operated valve
assemblies for modulating a flow of air and fuel to a burner which is disposed within
a furnace housing. In one of the most popular prior art systems in use today, a zirconium
oxide cell is placed within the furnace housing in order to compare the composition
of the flue gas to that of standard air. The zirconium oxide cell generates an electrical
signal indicative of the percentage of oxygen in the flue gas, and transmits this
signal to the input of a microprocessor. The output of the microprocessor is in turn
connected to the electrically operated valve assemblies which regulate the flow of
air and fuel to the burner. At each point along the firing range of the burner, the
microprocessor is programmed to modulate the air and fuel-controlling valve assemblies
so that the fuel combusts in an optimal manner. For the purposes of this application,
"optimum" combustion denotes combustion that achieves one or more of the goals of
the maximum stoichiometric fuel efficiency, maximum heat generation per unit of fuel,
and the minimum generation of pollutants such as NO
x and CO.
[0003] While zirconium oxide cells have proven to be effective for their intended purpose,
the applicant has noted a number of performance characteristics of these cells which
could stand improvement. For example, these cells are fragile, and require great care
during the installation procedure to, avoid breakage. This same fragility also renders
these cells subject to inadvertent breakage when routine maintenance operations are
performed from time to time over the lifetime of the burner. Additionally, because
these cells must be located in the interior of the furnace housing in order to analyze
the products of combustion of the burner, they are constantly exposed to corrosive
heat and gases and ash residues which can corrode, clog, and coat the outer surfaces
of the cell, thereby rendering it either inaccurate, or even inoperative. Finally,
these cells are often slow to respond to significant changes in the composition of
the flue gases which they monitor, which not only impairs the ability of the microprocessor
connected to the cell to maintain an optimum flow of air and fuel to the burner at
all times during the operation of the burner, but also prevents the microprocessor
from quickly recognizing the existence of an emergency condition within the furnace
which may require immediate burner shut-down and the triggering of an alarm circuit.
[0004] Acoustically operated burner control systems are also known in the prior art. Like
the previously described zirconium cell-type control systems, such acoustical systems
are operated on the basis of feedback from the conditions existing around the combustion
flame of the burner, which advantageously allows them to respond to a real-time, monitored
condition within the furnace housing to maintain an optimum combustion. Unfortunately,
such systems suffer from a number of drawbacks which has thus far effectively obstructed
the use and widespread commercialization of such systems. One of the largest of these
obstacles has been the inability of persons in the art to find a universally accurate
and useful relationship between the acoustical characteristics of the sound generated
within a furnace housing and optimum combustion. While studies have been conducted
which purport to demonstrate a measurable and usable relationship between the ratios
of the intensities of sounds generated at specific frequencies and optimum combustion,
the applicant has found that these relationships are not consistently reproducible,
and may not apply at all to different furnaces. These inconsistencies make it very
difficult to retrofit an acoustical burner control system onto a furnace already in
operation, as the non-universality of the acoustical relationships found in the prior
art make it necessary to empirically re-derive these relationships for every specific
model of furnace, assuming they exist at all. Worse yet, the applicant has found that
these ratio frequency relationships do not remain constant throughout the entire firing
range of the burner. Hence, if one were to attempt to use the acoustical relationships
disclosed in the prior art to optimally control a burner throughout its entire firing
range, it would be necessary to attempt to empirically find exactly what these relationships
might be at each point along the firing range, making the initial set up of the system
difficult, if not impossible in view of the fact that there may not be any usable
relationship at all at certain points in the firing range. Finally, because these
prior art approaches mainly rely upon sounds generated as a result of resonance between
the combustion flame and the chamber defined by the furnace housing, the microphones
used in such prior art system must be placed in the interior of the furnace housings,
which in turn exposes them to large amounts of heat and corrosive combustion products.
Just like the zirconium cells previously discussed, the exposure of these microphones
to such heat, combustion products and flue ashes can cause their readings to become
either inaccurate or entirely inoperative. In some prior art systems, a protective
jacket is provided around the microphone so that water can constantly circulate around
it. thereby protecting it from the heat generated by the furnace. However, the provision
of such a jacket and the need for a mechanism to constantly recirculate water through
it is an expensive and unwieldy solution to the problem of microphone durability in
the hostile environment present within the furnace housing.
[0005] Clearly, what is needed is an acoustical burner control system which is effective
and accurate in optimizing all aspects of combustion for a variety of different burners
and furnaces, and over the entire firing range of each such burner. Ideally, the system
should be easy to provide in new burners, and easy to retrofit in old burners that
utilize some sort of prior art burner control. The acoustical system should also be
easy to set up and calibrate, and should not require the empirical derivation of a
relationship between an acoustical property and optimum burning over a large number
of points of the firing range of the burner. Further, such an acoustical burner control
system should respond quickly to changes in the combustion characteristics of the
burner, and be formed from relatively durable, maintenance-free and long-lived components.
It would further be desirable if the microphone could somehow be removed from the
hostile environment within the furnace to increase its reliability and durability.
Finally, the acoustical control system should be able to immediately sense when either
a non-stoichiometric combustion condition exists, or excessive NO
x or other pollutants are being generated by the combustion flame.
[0006] An object of the invention is to provide an acoustically operated burner control
system and method for optimally controlling a flow of air and fuel into a flame producing
combustion burner throughout a range of firing rates which overcome or at least ameliorates
the shortcomings associated with the prior art.
[0007] According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided an acoustically
operated burner control system for optimally controlling a flow of air and fuel into
a flame producing combustion burner throughout a range of firing rates, comprising
first and second valve assemblies for modulating the flow of air and fuel into the
burner; a microphone means for generating an electrical signal indicative of the aggregate
intensity of the sound generated by said combustion flame above 1 kHz in frequency,
and a controller operatively connected to the first and second valve assemblies and
electrically connected to said microphone means for maintaining the aggregate sound
intensity generated by said combustion flame at a pre-selected level associated with
optimality at each point within said range of burner firing rates.
[0008] According to a another aspect of the invention there is provided an acoustically
operated burner control system for optimally controlling a flow of air and fuel into
a flame producing combustion burner, comprising a microphone means for generating
an electrical signal indicative of the aggregate intensity of the sound generated
by said combustion flame above 1 kHz in frequency, and a monitoring means electrically
connected to the output of the microphone means for recording the aggregate sound
intensity above 1 kHz generated by said combustion flame so that said aggregate sound
intensity may be compared to a pre-selected sound intensity above 1 kHz in frequency
associated with optimality.
[0009] The monitoring mechanism may include a chart recorder, a comparison circuit for continuously
comparing the sound intensity of the microphone with the pre-selected sound intensity,
and an alarm circuit for generating an alarm signal when these sound intensities are
not equal so that the flow rate of fuel and air into the burner may be manually re-adjusted
to achieve optimality.
[0010] The bandwidth of the microphone may include only those acoustical frequencies greater
than 5 kHz, 10 kHz, or preferably, greater than 20 kHz, or even more preferably greater
than 30 kHz. For this purpose, a microphone whose maximum sensitivity is centered
on 32 kHz may be used.
[0011] The system may further include an acoustical wave guide for remotely coupling the
microphone to the flame envelope while at the same time isolating the microphone from
the heat generated by the flame. Since the system is not in any way dependent upon
any acoustical interactions between the combustion flame and the furnace housing that
surrounds it, the microphone may advantageously be located outside of the furnace
housing. In such a configuration, the acoustical wave guide coupling the microphone
with the sound generated by the flame isolates the microphone not only from the heat
of the flame, but also from the combustion products generated by the flame, thereby
greatly lengthening its life expectancy. In the preferred embodiment, a .50 inch diameter
rod of a ceramic material such as aluminum oxide may be used as the wave guide.
[0012] The system may also include a portable analyzer probe for determining the optimal
stoichiometric and pollution minimizing settings of these valve assemblies over the
entire firing range of the burner prior to the operation of the burner. Finally, the
microprocessor controller of the system preferably includes a memory into which the
empirically-derived optimum air and fuel valve assembly settings may be entered for
sample points along the firing range of the burner, and appropriate software for interpolating
these sample points into a curve.
[0013] According to a further aspect of the invention there is provided a method for optimally
controlling a burner control system that includes an air valve assembly and a fuel
valve assembly for modulating air and fuel to a flame producing combustion burner
over a range of firing rates, comprising the step of maintaining the level of the
aggregate sound intensity of all sounds produced by the combustion flame of the burner
that have an acoustical frequency above 10 kHz at a pre-selected level associated
with optimality by adjusting said air and fuel valve assemblies.
[0014] In the method of the invention, the optimum air and fuel valve assembly settings
are empirically determined by means of the aforementioned analyzer probe for between
six and eight points along the firing range of the burner. This may be done by initially
operating the burner in an excess air mode at a particular point along the firing
range of the burner, and then gradually closing the air valve assembly until the analyzer
probe senses minimum excess O₂, and minimum acceptable CO, which would indicate that
stoichiometric optimality has been obtained. Next, the valve assemblies associated
with NO
x or other pollution minimization are adjusted to achieve further minimum pollution
emission. For example, in a burner having a flue gas recirculation mechanism that
quenches the burner flame in order to lower its temperature and to lower NO
x generation, the valve assembly that controls the flue gas recirculation flow is adjusted
until the NO
x reading sensed by the analyzer probe indicates that minimum NO
x generation has been achieved. The settings of the valve assemblies for fuel flow,
air flow and flue gas recirculation flow are all noted, along with the aggregate intensity
of all sounds over 10 Khz generated by the burner flame and these settings and associated
sound intensity are all entered into the memory of the microprocessor. This same method
step is repeated six to eight times across the entire firing range of the burner.
Next, the interpolation software of the microprocessor is actuated to generate an
optimality curve across the entire firing range of the burner. When the burner is
operated at a selected point along its firing range, the microprocessor constantly
adjusts the positions of the air and fuel valve assemblies in such a manner as to
maintain the aggregate intensity of all sounds having a frequency greater than 10
Khz at the optimal sound level associated with the selected point along the firing
range.
[0015] The acoustical burner control system of the invention is readily adaptable to a broad
variety of different types of burners, and is easy to calibrate and to retrofit onto
an existing furnace in view of the near linear nature of the optimum sound intensities
over the firing range of the burner. Moreover, the exterior positioning of the microphone
greatly facilitates the installation and access of the microphone onto an existing
system, and further facilitates microphone longevity by insulating it from the heat
and combustion by-products present within the furnace housing. Finally, the system
provides a simple and inexpensive way to achieve not only stoichiometric combustion,
but combustion that produces minimum amounts of pollutants such as NO
x as well.
[0016] For a better understanding of the invention, and to show how the same may be carried
into effect, reference will now be made by way of example only to the accompanying
drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of an automatically operated embodiment of the burner
control system of the invention as it would appear assembled onto a combustion burner
in a furnace assembly having motor controlled air and fuel valve assemblies;
Figure 2 is a graph which plots the sensitivity of a 32 kHz microphone over sound
frequencies ranging from 10 to 100 kHz;
Figure 3 is a graph which plots the average combustion sound intensity over the burner
firing rate for an excess air to fuel ratio, a stoichiometric ratio, and an excess
fuel to air ratio, as sensed by a 32 kHz microphone; and
Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of a manually operated embodiment of the control system
of the invention wherein the output of the system microphone is connected to a simple
monitoring mechanism that informs the system operator when the air and fuel valve
assemblies need re-adjustment.
[0017] With reference now to Figure 1, the burner control system 1 of the invention is particularly
well adapted for optimally controlling the combustion of fuel and air in a combustion
burner 3 mounted within a furnace assembly 5. The burner 3 may be any one of a number
of known and commercially available burner units having a variable firing rate. While
a burner 3 mounted in a furnace assembly 5 having a flue gas recirculation mechanism
for minimizing NO
x generation is used in this particular example, the invention may be used with burners
having other types of NO
x minimizing subsystems as well. The furnace assembly 5 includes a housing 7 with a
lower portion that contains the burner 3 and an upper portion that includes a flue
9. A peep site 11 is mounted in one of the walls of the housing 7 to assist the system
operator in determining whether or not the burner 3 is operating properly. The furnace
assembly 5 used to heat a boiler 13 in this example that generates steam for use in
a building heating system.
[0018] The outlet of the combustion burner 3 generates a flame 15 which is confined within
the walls of the housing 7, while the inlet of the burner is connected to an inlet
conduit 17 which receives not only a mixture of air and gaseous fuel, but also recirculated
flue gases which help to lower the maximum temperatures of combustion within the housing
7 and therefore to lower NO
x generation. Inlet conduit 17 is directly connected to an air source 19 formed from
a blower 21 having an inlet opening 23 for receiving ambient air, and an outlet conduit
25 for directing a flow of air into conduit 17. Fuel source 27 is also connected to
the conduit 17. The fuel source 27 is formed from a tank 29 of fuel, which may be
either gaseous or liquid, a shut-off valve 31 downstream of the fuel tank 29 which
allows the furnace assembly 5 to be shut-down for maintenance or repairs, and an outlet
conduit 33 which is connected to the burner inlet conduit 17 by means of a T-joint
as shown. Finally, conduit 17 is connected to recirculating flue gas source 35 which
includes a blower 37 having an inlet conduit 39 connected to the flue 9, and an outlet
conduit 41 which joins the blower inlet conduit 17 at another T-joint as shown.
[0019] In the preferred embodiment, the burner control system 1 of the invention includes
a microprocessor controller 43 which, as will be explained in more detail hereinafter,
controls the flow of air, fuel, and recirculated flue gases into the inlet conduit
17 of the combustion burner 3 in order to obtain optimum combustion. The microprocessor
controller 43 is preferably a "MasterMind"-type combustion controller manufactured
by Control Techtronics located in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
[0020] The burner control system further includes an air control valve assembly 45 for controlling
the amount of air that flows into the inlet conduit 17 of the combustion burner 3.
The air control valve assembly 45 includes a butterfly valve 47 that is pivotally
mounted within the outlet conduit 25 of the air source 19, and a motor 49 for pivoting
the butterfly valve 47 into a more opened or closed position within the conduit 25.
Motor 49 may be, for example, a model EA53 reversible DC motor manufactured by Barber-Colman
located in Rockford, Illinois. Such motors include a control circuit for regulating
both the voltage and the polarity of the current conducted through the motor. This
control circuit is in turn electrically connected to the output of the microprocessor
controller 43 through control cable 50. The air control valve assembly 45 further
includes a slide wire position indicator 51 connected to the motor 49 which indicates
the position of the armature of the motor 49 and hence the angle at which the butterfly
valve 47 is pivoted within the conduit 25. The slide wire position indicator is a
form of a variable resistor, and may be, for example, a model Q181 slide wire manufactured
by Honeywell located in Fort Washington, Pennsylvania. The output of the slide wire
position indicator 51 is electrically connected to the input of the microprocessor
43 by means of output cable 52. In addition to the air control valve assembly 45,
the air source 19 is also provided with a thermocouple 54 for measuring the temperature
of the ambient atmosphere. In the preferred embodiment, the thermocouple 54 may be
a model number M116-2000-80002-09 manufactured by Cleveland Electric Labs located
in Twinsburg, Ohio, and the output of this thermocouple 54 is electrically connected
to the input of the micro-processor controller 43 by means of cable 56 as shown. The
data that the thermocouple 54 provides to the microprocessor controller 43 is necessary
for the microprocessor 43 to compute the optimum air flow required by the combustion
burner 3, as the density of air and hence the amount of oxygen contained per volume
of air varies with the ambient temperature.
[0021] The burner control system 1 also includes a fuel control valve assembly 58. Fuel
control valve assembly 58 includes a motor operated butterfly valve 60 mounted within
the fuel outlet conduit 33 which may be a model BVA valve manufactured by the Eclipse
Corporation located in Rockford, Illinois. Fuel control valve assembly 58 also includes
a reversible, DC motor 62 for turning the butterfly valve 60 that is provided with
a control circuit for regulating the voltage and polarity of electric current conducted
through the motor 62, and a motor control cable 63 which connects the control circuit
of the motor 62 to the output of the microprocessor controller 43. The fuel control
valve assembly 58 includes a slide wire position indicator 65 mounted on to the motor
62 as shown. Both the motor 62 and slide wire position indicator 65 may be the same
commercially available type of motor and position indicator described with respect
to the air control valve assembly 45. As was the case with the slide wire position
indicator 51 used in the air control valve assembly 45, a position output cable 67
electrically connects the slide wire position indicator 65 with the input of the microprocessor
controller 43. Downstream of the gate valve 60 of the fuel control valve assembly
58 is a pressure gauge 69. This gauge 69 assists the system operator in the initial
set-up of the system 1, and further helps maintenance personnel determine whether
or not the system 1 is functioning properly. Upstream of the butterfly valve 60 of
the fuel control valve assembly 58 is a flowmeter 71 for accurately determining the
volume of gaseous fuel from fuel tank 29 that flows into the inlet conduit 17 of the
burner 3. This flowmeter 71 includes an orifice plate 73 which, in the preferred embodiment,
is a model FOM orifice plate manufactured by the Eclipse Corporation located in Rockford,
Illinois. The flowmeter 71 further includes a differential pressure sensor 75 that
is connected upstream and downstream from the orifice plate 73 by means of meter conduit
77a and 77b. A snubber is provided in meter conduit 77b for damping out any pulsations
in the flow of gaseous fuel flowing through fuel outlet conduit 33 so that the output
of the flow meter 71 is indicative of the average flow rate of gaseous fuel through
the conduit 33. In the preferred embodiment, the differential pressure sensor 75 is
a model P3081-SWD assembly manufactured by the Schaevitz Engineering Company located
in Pennsauken, New Jersey. The output of the differential pressure sensor 75 is related
to the input of the microprocessor through output cable 81.
[0022] The control system 1 also includes a flue gas control valve assembly 83. Like the
previously described air control valve assembly 45, the flue gas control valve assembly
83 is provided with a butterfly valve 85 which is mounted in outlet conduit 41, and
a reversible, DC motor 87 for controlling the position of the butterfly valve 85 within
the conduit 41. The motor 87 includes a control circuit for regulating the voltage
and the polarity of the electric current conducted through its respective motor. This
control circuit is electrically connected to the output of the microprocessor 43 by
way of motor control cable 89. A slide wire position indicator 91 is connected on
to the motor 87 for generating an electrical signal indicative of the position of
the armature of the motor, and hence the position of the butterfly valve 85 within
the outlet conduit 41. Information generated by the slide wire position indicator
89 is transmitted to the input of the microprocessor by means of position output cable
93.
[0023] A pressure sensor 95 is thermally connected to the steam boiler 13 for monitoring
the temperature of the steam heated by the furnace assembly 5. In operation, this
pressure will vary depending upon the demand placed upon the steam boiler 13 in heating
the aforementioned building. The pressure sensed by the sensor 95 is relayed to the
input of the microprocessor controller 43 by means of cable 96. Pressure sensor 95
is preferably a model P-3061 sensor manufactured by The Schaevitz Engineering Company
located in Pennsauken, New Jersey. Still another component included within the control
system 1 is an analyzer probe 99 which is shown in phantom since the probe 99 is used
only for the initial setting-up of the system 1. This probe 99 is detachably mountable
to the flue 9 of the furnace assembly 5, and generates an electrical signal indicative
of the amount of free oxygen and pollutants present in the flue gases. This signal
is transmitted to the input of the probe microprocessor 99.5 by way of cable 100.
Analyzer probe 99 may be any one of a number of commercially available oxygen probes,
such as a model 2000 portable analyzer manufactured by Enerac located in Long Island,
New York.
[0024] Finally, and most importantly, the control system 1 of the invention includes an
acoustical sensor 101 that generates an electrical signal indicative of the intensity
of the sound of the flame 15 within the furnace assembly 5. As will be seen hereinafter,
the applicant has discovered that the aggregate intensity of all sounds having frequencies
over about 10 KHz generated by the flame 15 is directly related to combustion optimality,
and may be used to burn fuel with a maximum amount of stoichiometric efficiency and
a minimum amount of pollution generation, and in particular minimum NO
x generation. To this end, the acoustic sensor 101 includes a microphone 103 which
is advantageously located outside the housing 7 of the furnace assembly 5. In the
preferred embodiment, the microphone 103 is a model ALM-CH 8/N 541,542 acoustic emitter
that is maximally responsive to sound frequencies of 32 KHz or greater, as is shown
in Figure 2. A wave guide 105 is used to transmit the sounds generated within the
envelope of the flame 15 to the microphone 103. In the preferred embodiment, the wave
guide 105 is a solid bar of aluminum oxide approximately 1/2" in diameter and 20"
long. Such an aluminum oxide bar is available from Aremco Products, located in Ossining,
New York. The wave guide is mounted within the walls of the housing 7 by means of
guide mounting 106. In the preferred embodiment, the wave guide 105 is slidably movable
through a bore in the wave guide mounting 106 so that, during initial set-up, the
system operator can easily visually locate the distal end of the wave guide 105 approximately
within the center of the envelope of the flame 15. A ring of acoustical dampening
material, which may be a heat resistant silicone compound, is included around the
wave guide mount 106 to minimize the transmission of spurious sounds from the walls
of the furnace housing 7 to the wave guide 105 during operation.
[0025] The use of a solid, ceramic material such as aluminum oxide as the wave guide 105
of the acoustical sensor 101 is advantageous in at least three respects. First, applicant
has found that use of such a solid bar of ceramic material efficiently and effectively
conducts the relatively high frequency sounds of 10 KHz or greater to the microphone
103, thereby allowing the microphone to be placed in the ambient atmosphere away from
the corrosive combustibles generated within the furnace housing 7. Secondly, because
ceramic materials such as aluminum oxide often are good heat insulators, very little
of the heat generated within the envelope of the flame 15 is transmitted to the microphone
103. Thirdly, because ceramic materials are extremely durable in high temperature
environments, and do not corrode, the aluminum oxide bar that forms the wave guide
103 is extremely long lived. The electrical output generated by the microphone 103
is connected to a preamplifier 107 whose output is in turn connected to a filter/amplifier
109. In the preferred embodiment, the preamplifier is a model 1220A-S/N 5211,5212
preamp manufactured by Physical Acoustics located in Princeton, New Jersey, and the
filter/amplifier is a model ALM-CH S/N541,542 filter/amplifier also manufactured by
Physical Acoustics.
[0026] In the first step of the method of the invention, the analyzer probe 99 is detachably
mounted within the flue 9 of the furnace housing 7 as indicated. Next, the burner
3 is ignited, and the microvolts generated by the 32 kHz microphone 103 is plotted
at preferably between six to eight sample points across the firing range of the burner
3 under optimum combustion conditions. Of course, the number of microvolts generated
by the microphone 103 is proportional to the decibels of all sounds generated by the
flame 15 in excess of about 10 kHz, with the frequency range of between about 30 and
100 kHz being noted with particular care, as the microphone 103 is most sensitive
to these frequencies (see Figure 2). At the outset, it should be noted that it is
the applicant's discovery of a simple, very reliable and near-linear relationship
between the intensity of all high frequency sounds generated within the envelope of
the flame 15 of the burner 3 and optimum learning conditions that makes the present
invention possible. This relationship is illustrated in the family of curves illustrated
in Figure 3. The middle curve that is associated with stoichiometric optimality has
two characteristics that contribute to its usefulness in the context of a burner control
system. First, as is evident from a comparison of the vertical distances between the
stoichiometric curve, the excess air curve and the excess fuel curve, there is at
least a 100 microvolt difference between these curves, which makes it easy for the
microprocessor controller 43 to resolve optimal vs. non-optimal operating conditions.
Second, the stoichiometric curve has broad regions of linearity which allows the microprocessor
43 to accurately interpolate the entire curve from a relatively small number of sample
points.
[0027] The optimum air and flue gas valve settings for each of the sample points is empirically
determined with the help of the analyzer probe 99. To do thisl the burner 3 is first
ignited. In order to minimize the amount of time it takes to obtain a single optimum
sample point at a point within the firing range of the burner 3, the system operator
will set the air valve assembly 45 so that the burner 3 initially combusts in an excess
air mode. The system operator will then gradually close the air valve assembly 45
until the analyzer probe 99 indicates that minimum free O₂ and minimum free CO are
being generated by the burner 3, which indicates that stoichiometric burning has been
achieved. Next, the blower 37 of the recirculating flue gas source 35 is activated,
and the flue gas valve assembly 83 gradually opened from an initially closed position
while the system operator monitors the amount of NO
x generated by the flame 15 of the burner 3. After the minimum NO
x generation has been achieved for the particular point on the firing range that the
fuel valve assembly 60 has been set (which may be determined by comparing the NO
x level achieved with minimum NO
x generation specifications supplied by the manufacturer of the burner 3), the position
of the air valve assembly 45 and recirculating flue gas valve assembly 83 is noted
and entered into the memory of the microprocessor controller 43, along with the associated
microvolt output of the microphone 103. The NO
x minimisation step tends to drop the optimized curve (shown with a dashed line) downwardly
from the stoichiometric curve into the position illustrated in Figure 3, as minimized
NO
x generation tends to lower the total amount of high frequency sounds generated by
the burner 3.
[0028] After the system operator has entered between six and eight sample points into the
memory of the microprocessor controller 43 (which points are preferably uniformly
distributed across the entire firing range of the burner 3), the interpolation software
of the microprocessor controller 43 is actuated to plot a complete curve of optimum
valve assembly positions for the fuel valve 60, air valve 45 and flue gas valve 35
for each point along the firing range of the burner 3.
[0029] The analyzer probe 99 is then removed from the flue 9 of the furnace housing 7, and
the microprocessor 43 actuated. All during the operation of the combustion burner
3, the microprocessor 43 constantly monitors the voltage generated by the microphone
103 (which is, of course, directly indicative of the aggregate level of sounds having
frequencies over about 12 KHz generated within the envelope of the flame 15), and
constantly adjusts the air control, fuel control and flue gas control valve assemblies
45, 58 and 83 in order to maintain optimality at all points along the firing rate
of the burner 3, which firing rate varies in response to the heat demand that the
furnace assembly 5 is subjected to.
[0030] Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of a manually operated alternate embodiment of the
control system 1 of the invention. In this embodiment, the output of the filter/amplifier
109 is electrically connected to a monitoring mechanism 110 that monitors the output
of the sound intensity detected by the acoustical sensor 101 so that it can be compared
to empirically-derived sound intensities associated with optimality. To this end,
the output of the monitoring mechanism is connected to a chart recorder 112 that records
the sound intensities detected by the sensor 101 over time. This embodiment preferably
also includes a comparator circuit 114 for continuously and automatically comparing
the detected sound intensities with the optimal sound intensities, and an alarm circuit
115 for informing the system operator when the air and fuel valve assemblies 45 and
58 and flue gas control valve assembly 83 are in need of readjustment.
[0031] While the invention has been described in the context of a control system 1 for a
natural gas burner 3 used to heat a steam boiler, it will be evident to persons skilled
in the art that the invention is applicable to any type of furnace having a flame
generating burner, and all such applications are considered to be within the scope
of this invention. Such applications may include, for example, furnaces used in steel
and aluminum plants, glass melters, aggregate rotary dryers, ladel heating stations,
and others.
1. An acoustically operated burner control system for controlling a flow of air and
fuel into a flame producing combustion burner throughout a range of firing rates,
comprising:
first and second valve assemblies for modulating the flow of air and fuel into the
burner;
a microphone means for generating an electrical signal indicative of the aggregate
intensity of the sound generated by said combustion flame above 1 kHz in frequency,
and
a controller operatively connected to the first and second valve assemblies and electrically
connected to said microphone means for maintaining the aggregate sound intensity generated
by said combustion flame at a pre-selected level.
2. An acoustically operated burner system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said controller
is arranged to maintain the aggregate sound intensity generated by said combustion
flame at one of a series of pre-selected levels each of which is associated with optimality
at a point within said range of burner firing rates.
3. An acoustically operated burner control system as claimed in claim 1 or 2, further
comprising a probe means for determining the aggregate sound intensities associated
with optimality.
4. An acoustically operated burner control system as claimed in claim 3, wherein said
probe means determines said aggregate sound intensities by measuring the amount of
oxygen present in the combustion products of said flame at different settings of said
first and second valve means.
5. An acoustically operated burner control system as claimed in any preceding claim,
wherein said valve means are each electrically controlled, and wherein said controller
is electrically connected to each of said valves.
6. An acoustically operated burner control system as claimed in any preceding claim,
further including an acoustical waveguide for coupling said microphone means to said
flame and isolating the microphone means from the heat generated by the flame.
7. An acoustically operated burner control system as claimed in any preceding claim,
wherein said burner is enclosed in a furnace housing, and said microphone means is
located outside of said housing, and said acoustical waveguide further functions to
isolate the microphone means from the combustion products generated by the flame.
8. An acoustically operated burner control system as claimed in any preceding claim,
wherein said controller includes a microprocessor having a memory, and wherein said
pre-selected sound levels are entered into the memory of the microprocessor.
9. An acoustically operated burner control system as claimed in any preceding claim,
wherein said controller maintains the aggregate sound intensity associated with optimality
at each point along said firing range of said burger by modulating said valve assemblies
to equate the sound intensity sensed by said microphone means with the sound intensity
entered into said microprocessor memory.
10. An acoustically operated burner control system for optimally controlling a flow
of air and fuel into a flame producing combustion burner, comprising:
a microphone means for generating an electrical signal indicative of the aggregate
intensity of the sound generated by said combustion flame above 1 kHz in frequency,
and
a monitoring means electrically connected to the output of the microphone means for
recording the aggregate sound intensity above 1 kHz generated by said combustion flame
so that said aggregate sound intensity may be compared to a pre-selected sound intensity
above 1 kHz in frequency associated with optimality.
11. An acoustically operated burner control system as claimed in claim 10, further
comprising a means for comparing the aggregate sound intensity detected by the microphone
means, band the pre-selected sound intensity above 1 kHz in frequency, and for generating
an alarm signal when said sound intensities are not substantially equal.
12. An acoustically operated burner control system as claimed in any preceding claim,
wherein the bandwidth of said microphone means includes only acoustical frequencies
greater than 5 kHz, preferably greater than 10 kHz, more preferably greater than 20
kHz, and most preferably greater than 30 kHz.
13. A method for optimally controlling a burner control system that includes an air
valve assembly and a fuel valve assembly for modulating air and fuel to a flame producing
combustion burner over a range of firing rates, comprising the step of:
maintaining the level of the aggregate sound intensity of all sounds produced by the
combustion flame of the burner that have an acoustical frequency above 1 kHz, preferably
above 10 kHz at a pre-selected level associated with optimality by adjusting said
air and fuel valve assemblies.
14. A burner control method as claimed in claim 13, further including the step of
obtaining, for each point along said range of firing rates, the sound intensity level
associated with optimality by measuring the level of the sound intensity of said sounds
while simultaneously measuring the amount of oxygen present in the combustion products
of said flame associated with different settings of said air and fuel valve assemblies.
15. A burner control method as defined in claim 13 or 14, wherein the level of the
sounds equated have an acoustical frequency above 20 kHz, and preferably above 30
kHz.
16. A burner control method as defined in any preceding claim, wherein the amount
of pollutants present in the combustion products of said flame is also measured.
17. A burner control method as defined in claim 14, wherein the level of sound intensity
of all sounds produced by the combustion flame of the burner is measured by a microphone
means having a bandwidth that includes only those acoustical frequencies that are
over 10 kHz.
18. A method for optimally controlling a burner control system that includes an air
valve assembly and a fuel valve assembly for modulating air and fuel to a flame producing
combustion burner over a range of firing rates, comprising the step of:
obtaining, for a plurality of points along said range of firing rates, the sound intensity
level associated with stoichiometric optimality by measuring the level of intensity
of all sounds having frequencies of over 10 kHz generated by said combustion flame
when said burner is burning air and fuel at a stoichiometric ratio at said points
along said firing rate;
interloping and recording a sound level for each point along the firing range of said
burner that is associated with optimality;
operating said burner at selected point along said firing range, and
maintaining the sound intensity level of all sounds generated by the combustion flame
having acoustical frequencies of over 10 kHz at the optimal sound level associated
with said selected point along said firing range by adjusting said valve assemblies.