Technical Field
[0001] This invention relates to electromagnetic article surveillance (EAS) systems of the
the type in which an alternating magnetic field is applied within an interrogation
zone, and the presence of a high-permeability low-coercive force ferromagnetic marker
within the zone is detected based on signals produced by the marker in response to
the applied field. The present invention is directed to an apparatus for changing
the response of such markers.
Background
[0002] In one type of EAS system, the marker includes both a high-permeability low-coercive
force portion, and at least one magnetizable section having a higher coercive force
than the low-coercive force portion. When the higher coercive force section is magnetized,
it alters the detectable signal otherwise produced. Such markers are known as "dual
status" markers. An example of a dual status marker is taught in U.S. Patent 4,825,197
(Church and Heltemes).
[0003] EAS systems of this type are, for example, disclosed and claimed in U.S. Patent 3,665,449
(Elder and Wright). As they set forth at column 5, lines 10 to 39, a dual status marker
of the type described above may be "sensitized" (i.e., the higher coercive force section
demagnetized) by placing the marker in a large AC field, and gradually withdrawing
the marker.
[0004] German Offenlegungsschrift DE 30 14 667 Al (Reiter) depicts a type of desensitizer
employing a resistive-inductive-capacitive (RLC) circuit to produce magnetic fields
which steadily alternate in polarity and decrease in magnitude. The magnetic fields
are produced by winding the inductive coils around rib-like cores arranged about the
desensitization region. The directions of the windings around the coils alternate,
and thus the polarities of the magnetic fields produced alternate. Thus, when the
circuit is activated, sharply defined magnetic zones of alternating polarity arise,
through which the article affixed with a marker may be passed.
[0005] While such techniques may be useful for the markers affixed to a wide variety of
articles, the magnetic fields required for effective resensitization interfere with
magnetic states associated with certain articles. For example, the compact size and
popularity of prerecorded magnetic audio and video cassettes make such articles frequent
targets for shoplifters, and hence likely articles on which EAS markers would be affixed.
However, in a rental situation, when such markers are resensitized upon return from
rental, a resensitizer apparatus as described above may unacceptably affect the signals
prerecorded on the magnetic tapes within the cassettes. Similarly, magnetic disks
(flexible or otherwise) or any other magnetic data storage medium may be affected
by the resensitizer apparatus.
[0006] Commercial embodiments of resensitizers are the Model 950 and 951 resensitizers available
from the Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M). Another embodiment is taught
in U.S. Patent 4,752,758 (Heltemes).
Disclosure of Invention
[0007] The apparatus of the present invention comprises a ferromagnetic core having two
surfaces which face, but do not touch, each other and thereby define a gap. Optionally,
the gap may be formed by surfaces of a pair of pole pieces which concentrate external
magnetic flux. Furthermore, the core is wrapped with wire, forming an apparatus which
may be driven by an electric circuit to produce a magnetic field in the gap. Preferably,
an alternating current source is used, in which case a sinusoidal magnetic field is
created and the apparatus operates as a resensitizer. However, if a direct current
source is used, the present invention may be used as a desensitizer.
Brief Description of the Drawing
[0008] Figure 1 is a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the invention;
[0009] Figures 2A, 2B, and 2C are cross sectional views of alternative embodiments of a
portion of the invention;
[0010] Figure 3 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a circuit portion of the invention;
and
[0011] Figures 4A, 4B, and 4C are electronic schematic diagrams of one embodiment of a circuit
portion of the invention.
Detailed Description
[0012] As shown in Figure 1, the present invention may be in the form of an apparatus 10
having a housing 11 and a concealed cavity 12. The cavity 12 is covered by a non-magnetic
cover plate 14 which both covers and protects an assembly 13 in the cavity 12.
[0013] In using the apparatus 10, as shown in Figure 1, an article 16 is moved in the direction
shown by arrow 22 so that a resensitizable marker (not shown) which is affixed to
the exterior of the article 16 will pass over the cavity 12, i.e., directly on the
cover plate 14. The apparatus 10 may be used with the working surface established
by the cover plate 14 in a horizontal position, such that the article 16 may be moved
across the horizontal surface.
[0014] The housing 11 of the apparatus 10 is preferably constructed from non-magnetic materials,
e.g., finished hardwood, injection-molded plastic, or non-magnetic metals. The housing
11 may carry appropriate legends, manufacturer identification, instructions, and the
like.
[0015] The cover plate 14 provides a surface over which articles affixed with resensitizable
markers may be passed during use of the apparatus. For example, such a cover plate
14 may comprise polished stainless steel having a thickness in the range of 0.1mm.
The cover plate 14 should be polished metal, as such a surface resists scratching
or chipping, and thus remains aesthecially acceptable even over many cycles of use.
[0016] The marker typically comprises a piece of a high-permeability, low-coercive force
ferromagnetic material such as permalloy, certain amorphous alloys, or the like. The
marker further comprises one or more high-coercive force magnetizable sections in
the immediate vicinity of the low-coercive force material. These sections typically
are a material such as vicalloy, silicon steel, "ARNOKROME" (a tradename of the Arnold
Engineering Company) or the like, having a coercive force in the range of 0.25 to
3.0 Ampere/meter (A/m). When such sections are magnetized, the residual fields produced
magnetically bias the low-coercive force material. This bias substantially alters
the signal response produced by the marker in the presence of an interrogating field.
To demagnetize the sections, they are brought into close proximity with the assembly
13 within cavity 12, and then moved away.
[0017] The assembly 13 is located in the cavity 12. The cavity 12 is bounded by the housing
11 and the cover plate 14, and open to the latter. The cavity 12 is open to the surface
of the apparatus 10, save for the cover plate 14 if one is employed.
[0018] For illustrative purposes, the article 16 includes an outer enclosure 26, and a prerecorded
audio cassette 28. The cassette 28 includes a reel of magnetic tape 30 having one
portion 32 passing along a tape path in the vicinity of the assembly 13. The configuration
of the article 16 thus presents a worst case: a portion of the tape 32 may be relatively
close to the assembly 13, such that the fields which demagnetize the sections could
unacceptably affect the magnetic states of the tape 30, but for the special configuration
of the assembly 13.
[0019] As shown in Figure 1, the assembly 13 comprises a high-permeability core 40 which
in cross section is substantially continuous around a core interior 41, or "ring shaped,"
except for a gap 44. The gap 44 is adjacent the surface of the apparatus 10. The length
of gap 44, measured from one face to the other, is substantially less than the length
of the magnetic circuit around the core interior 41. The assembly 13 further comprises
a conductor 43 wound around the core 40. In practice, the conductor 43 is many turns
of wire, but for clarity in Figure 1, only a single winding is shown.
[0020] The conductor 43 is electromagnetically coupled to the core 40 and is electrically
connected to an electrical current source (not shown). When current passes through
the conductor 43, a magnetizing field along the magnetic circuit of the core 40 induces
magnetic flux throughout the magnetic circuit, and across the gap 44. The optional
bevels 45 in the core 40 concentrate the magnetic flux in the vicinity of the gap
44. However, because the magnetic flux density in the low-permeability gap 44 is substantially
less than that in the high-permeability core 40, the magnetic flux "leaks" into regions
adjacent the gap 44.
[0021] This produces a magnetic field in the direction across the gap which decreases rapidly
with perpendicular distance above the gap, and the rate of decrease can be controlled
by the selection of gap length. In use, a magnetically sensitive article such as an
appropriately boxed prerecorded cassette may be positioned above the working surface
of the resensitizer apparatus as shown in Figure 1 and the prerecorded tape will never
be closer than approximately 6mm from the gap 44 as shown in Figure 1. In contrast,
the high-coercive force sections of the marker will typically be separated from the
assembly 13 only by the thickness of the cover plate 14 (i.e., about 0.1 mm) and will
thus typically be exposed to a much greater field intensity. Also, magnetic recording
media typically have a coercive force of 3.75-8.75 A/m. Therefore, the magnetic fields
required to resensitize the marker can leave the prerecorded signals on the tape unaffected.
[0022] The current source may be direct current, in which case the apparatus operates as
a desensitizer of markers. The marker may be moved relative to the gap to expose the
section of high coercive force material within the marker to a large magnetic field.
As before, the external field intensity extending beyond a short distance from the
gap is insufficient to alter a magnetic state which may exist within an article to
which the marker is secured. In the preferred embodiment, alternating current is used
and the apparatus operates as a resensitizer of previously desensitized markers.
[0023] Because the conductor is wound around the magnetic assembly, the conductor may be
treated as an inductive coil. Using this concept, a resistor and capacitor can be
added in series or in parallel with the conductor to create an RLC circuit with a
resonant frequency determined by the appropriate electrical properties of the components.
[0024] In general terms, it is preferred that the resensitizer operate effectively when
the marker is passed over the gap 44 at a speed of approximately 60 cm/s or less.
Non-inventive systems in current use operate effectively at recommended marker speeds
of no more than about 8 cm/s. Thus, the preferred resonant frequency of the RLC circuit
is 1 KHz or greater, to ensure that a sufficient number of reversals of the field
occurs while the marker 18 is being drawn out of the effective range of the assembly
13. The actual frequency preferred depends on the speed at which the marker is passed,
and the amount of decrease in field strength as a function of distance from the gap.
It is preferred that the marker is exposed to a field in which the field strength
has a "drop rate" of no more than about 25% of the previous cycle of the AC field.
The drop rate can be halved by doubling the frequency.
[0025] In selecting a frequency, the change in inductance of the circuit which occurs as
the marker is passed over the gap should be taken into account. This generally means
driving the circuit at a reference frequency which is slightly less than the calculated
resonant frequency, so that the current in the circuit is maximized as the marker
is centered over the gap. Selection of the reference frequency can be done through
tests with actual markers being used.
[0026] With certain types of markers, it is preferred to shield the assembly and marker
from extraneous fields, such as the earth,s magnetic field. Shielding the marker is
often not practical, but shielding the assembly is possible using procedures and materials
known in the art.
[0027] A suitable core 40 in the configuration of Figure 1 was made from 170 laminations
of approximately 0.36 mm thick transformer steel, for a total width (i.e., measured
perpendicular to the plane of Figure 1) of approximately 61.2 mm. The gap length was
2.54 mm, and the assembly was wrapped with sixty turns of #23 AWG enameled wire. Currents
on the order of 1.44 to 2.03 amperes were suitable for producing fields in the direction
across the gap of about 0.5-1.0 A/m at 6 mm height above the gap, and about 1.5-2.0
A/m at about 0.25 mm height. This particular embodiment would produce a field of up
to the desired 3 A/m if a higher current were used.
[0028] An alternative configuration for the core is shown in Figure 2A. The alternative
assembly is designated as 13', and portions of it which serve analogous roles to numbered
portions of Figure 1 are similarly designated with primed numerals. The core 40, is
essentially "U-shaped" in cross section, and defines core interior 41'. The assembly
13' as shown employs optional pole pieces 46 to define gap 44' and concentrate magnetic
flux. The assembly 13' of Figure 2A, including pole pieces 46, has a preferred gap
length of 1 mm, but other lengths are possible by adjusting the size and/or positioning
of pole pieces 46.
[0029] Other configurations for the core are possible. For example, as shown in Figure 2B,
two U-shaped cores 41" may be butted together and sealed at one leg by a sealer 47
to form a gap 44" at the other leg. Then a conductor 43" is wrapped around the exterior
of the assembly 13" and the core interior 41". As shown in Figure 2C, assembly 13'''
comprises an "E-shaped" core 40''' which has two gaps 44'''. In this embodiment the
conductor 43''' is wound within the two interior regions 41'''. As shown, optional
pole pieces 46',, define gaps 44'''.
[0030] Assemblies constructed according to the designs of Figures 2A, 2B, and 2C may be
assembled from commercially available ferrite cores, as opposed to custom-made assemblies.
However, an assembly 13 constructed according to the embodiment of Figure 1 is preferred
because it exhibits less field strength measured at the side of the gap, as a percentage
of that measured directly above the gap, than an assembly 13, constructed according
to the embodiment of Figure 2A. For representative core assemblies, the former value
was approximately 6% as opposed to approximately 20% for the latter.
[0031] Figure 3 is a block diagram of a suitable circuit for use with the embodiment of
Figure 2A. In this circuit, a current controlled oscillator holds the current in the
coil 50 constant. The coil 50 is in series with a capacitor 51 and a current sense
resistor 52. The current in the coil 50 is detected by determining the voltage drop
across the sense resistor 52, i.e., the voltage between sense wires 53 and 54. This
voltage drop serves as feedback into a control circuit 56 through a rectifier and
current sensing amplifier 55. The control circuit 56 is a proportional-integrating
regulator which compares the feedback voltage with a precision voltage reference 57.
If these voltages are equal, the circuit resonates at the resonant frequency established
by the values of the capacitor 51 and coil 50. A power amplifier 58 compensates for
the power loss of the resonanting circuit. This circuit shows very good independence
of resonant frequency with changes in ambient temperature over the range of 20 to
60@C, and relatively good independence of gap field intensity with changes in ambient
temperature over the range of 20 to 40@C.
[0032] Figure 4A shows an example of a circuit built according to the block diagram of Figure
3, suitable for use with the assembly of Figure 2A. The circuit of Figure 4A is powered
by the circuit of Figure 4C, which corresponds to the power supply 59 of Figure 3,
and which produces suitable positive and negative operating voltages (e.g., ±15 VDC)
and ground level. In Figure 4B, a circuit corresponding to precision voltage reference
57 of Figure 3 is shown, including potentiometers P1 and P2 and jumper JP1, which
allow for adjustment of the reference voltage in the circuit of Figure 4A.
[0033] Suitable exemplary components for this circuit are shown in Table I, below, but variations
known to those skilled in the art are acceptable. In general, the components are of
relatively low tolerance and cost, as the circuit automatically adjusts for the proper
resonant frequency despite the component tolerances.

[0034] A variety of embodiments and alternative configurations of the apparatus of the present
invention are possible, including the use of a variety of wire types, number of turns,
and the like; a variety of pole piece configurations; and a variety of driving circuits.
The width of the gap is substantially unlimited, it being limited only by the width
of the core and pole pieces ( if used) provided. Thus, an apparatus according to the
present invention may be constructed having variable length gaps, or varying width
gaps. Furthermore, the core need not have parallel faces forming the gap as shown
in the figures, but may have beveled or tapered faces to focus magnetic flux, as is
known in the art.
1. An apparatus adapted for changing the status of a resensitizable marker secured to
an article used with an electronic article surveillance system, in which the marker
includes a low-coercive force, high-permeability ferromagnetic material and at least
one section of a remanently magnetizable, relatively higher coercive force material
which when magnetized magnetically biases the low coercive force material and thereby
alters the detectability of the marker; the apparatus comprising:
(a) at least one section of ferromagnetic material having two substantially opposed
surfaces, the surfaces facing but not touching each other such that a gap exists between
the surfaces;
(b) a conductor wound around outer and inner portions of the ferromagnetic material;
and
(c) a current source capable of driving the assembly such that the ferromagnetic material
may be magnetized to present one magnetic polarity at one of the major surfaces and
the opposite polarity on the other major surface, and such that the assembly concentrates
external magnetic lines of flux near the gap.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a housing having a surface adapted to
support an article as a marker affixed to the article is moved past the gap, and a
cavity within which the assembly is positioned so that the gap of the assembly is
adjacent the surface.
3. The apparatus of claim 2, further comprising a thin non-magnetic metallic plate covering
the surface.
4. The apparatus of claim 1, in which the current source provides alternating polarity
current such that the apparatus operates as a resensitizer.
5. The apparatus of claim 4, in which the current source operates at at least about 1KHz.
6. The apparatus of claim 4, in which the current source operates at a frequency which
maximizes current in the coil when a marker is adjacent the gap.
7. The apparatus of claim 4, further comprising shielding which reduces the ambient magnetic
flux in the vicinity of the core.
8. The apparatus of claim 4, in which the concentration of magnetic flux is sufficient
to resensitize a marker having a higher-coercivity portion of up to 3 ampere/meter
in coercivity.
9. The apparatus of claim 4, in which the current source comprises:
(1) a coil in series with a capacitor and a current sense resistor;
(2) means for determining a voltage drop across the sense resistor and using the voltage
drop as feedback into a control circuit comprising a proportional-integral regulator
with compares the voltage drop with a precision voltage reference such that the current
in the coil is held constant.
10. The apparatus of claim 9, in which the current source further comprises means for
compensating for power loss of the circuit.