Background of the Invention
Field of the Invention
[0001] The present invention relates generally to metal container bodies of the type having
a seamless sidewall and a bottom formed integrally therewith. More particularly, the
present invention relates to a bottom contour that provides increased cumulative drop
resistance.
Description of the Related Art
[0002] There have been numerous container configurations produced by manufacturers. This
has been especially true for the two-piece container manufacturer, that is, a container
having a body that has an integral bottom wall at one end, and an opposite end that
is configured to have a closure secured thereto. Container manufacturers package beverages
of various types in these containers formed of either steel or aluminum alloys.
[0003] The most ideal type of container bottom wall would be a flat wall which would allow
for maximum capacity for a given container with a minimum height. However, such a
container is not economically feasible because, in order to prevent deformation, the
thickness of the bottom wall would have to be of such magnitude that the cost of the
container would be prohibitive.
[0004] In order to negate these costs, drawing and ironing processes have been installed
and extensively used in recent years, especially for the aluminum container industry.
In the production of these containers that utilize drawing and ironing, it is important
that the body wall and bottom wall of the container be as thin as possible no that
the container can be sold at a competitive price. Much work has been done on thinning
the body wall.
[0005] Aside from seeking thin body wall structures, various bottom wall configurations
have been investigated. In this regard, strength of the container has been a paramount
factor in these investigations. An early attempt in seeking sufficient rigidity of
the bottom wall was to form the same into a spherical dome configuration. This general
configuration is shown in Dunn et al., U.S. Patent No. 3,760,751, September 25, 1973.
The bottom wall is thereby provided with an inwardly concave dome or depression which
includes substantially all of the bottom wall of the container. In effect, this domed
configuration provides increased strength and resists deformation of the bottom wall
under increased internal pressure of the container with little change in the overall
geometry of the bottom wall throughout the pressure range for which the container
is designed.
[0006] Various modifications of the dome configuration have been manufactured. In this regard,
the dome structure itself has been integrally formed with other curvilinear or walled
members, usually at different inclinations to that of the longitudinal axis of the
container, in order to further strengthen the container structure. Although such modifications
rendered improved rigidity and stability, it has been found that such characteristics
can still be achieved, and in some aspects even improved, with a minimum of metal
being required.
[0007] Although this domed configuration has allowed container manufacturers to somewhat
reduce the metal thickness, container manufacturers are continuously working on techniques
that will allow for further reduction in metal thickness without sacrificing container
strength. An optimized configuration has not been an easy task.
[0008] The prior art that teaches domed bottoms also includes P. G. Stephan, U.S. Patent
No. 3,349,956, October 31, 1967; Kneusel et al., U.S. Patent No. 3,693,828, September
26, 1972; Dunn et al., U.S. Patent No. 3,730,383, May 1, 1973; Toukmanian, U.S. Patent
No. 3,904,069, September 9, 1975; Lyu et al., U.S. Patent No. 3,942,673, March 9,
1976; Miller et al., U.S. Patent No. 4,294,373, October 13, 1981; McMillin, U.S. Patent
No. 4,834,256, May 30, 1989; and Pulciani et al., U.S. Patent No. 4,685,582, August
11, 1987, and No. 4,768,672, September 6, 1988.
[0009] Patents which teach apparatus for forming containers with domed bottoms and/or which
teach containers having domed bottoms, include Maeder et al., U.S. Patent No. 4,289,014,
September 15, 1981; Gombas, U.S. Patent No. 4,341,321, July 27, 1982; Elert et al.,
U.S. Patent No. 4,372,143, February 8, 1983; and Pulciano et al., U.S. Patent No.
4,620,434, November 4, 1986.
[0010] Stephan, in U.S. Patent No. 3,349,956, teaches using a reduced diameter annular supporting
portion with an inwardly domed bottom disposed intermediate of the reduced diameter
annular supporting portion. Stephan also teaches stacking of the reduced diameter
annular supporting portion inside the double-seamed top of another container.
[0011] Kneusel et al., in U.S. Patent No. 3,693,828, teach a steel container having a bottom
portion which is frustoconically shaped to provide a reduced diameter annular supporting
portion, and having an internally domed bottom that is disposed radially inwardly
of the annular supporting portion. Various contours of the bottom are adjusted to
provide more uniform coating of the interior bottom surface, including a reduced radius
of the domed bottom.
[0012] Pulciani et al., in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,685,582 and 4,768,672, instead of the frustoconical
portion of Kneusel et al., teach a transition portion between the cylindrically shaped
body of the container and the reduced diameter annular supporting portion that includes
a first annular arcuate portion that is convex with respect to the outside diameter
of the container and a second annular arcuate portion that is convex with respect
to the outside diameter of the container.
[0013] McMillin, in U.S. Patent No. 4,834,256, teaches a transitional portion between the
cylindrically shaped body of the container and the reduced diameter annular supporting
portion that is contoured to provide stable stacking for containers having a double-seamed
top which is generally the same diameter as the cylindrical body, as well as providing
stable stacking for containers having a double-seamed top that is smaller than the
cylindrical body. In this design, containers with reduced diameter tops stack inside
the reduced diameter annular supporting portion; and containers with larger tops stack
against this specially contoured transitional portion.
[0014] Various of the prior art patents, including Pulciano et al., U.S. Patent No. 4,620,434
(which is used as a basis for drafting claim 1 of the present patent), teach contours
which are designed to increase the pressure at which fluid inside the container reverses
the dome at the bottom of the container. This pressure is called the static dome reversal
pressure. In this patent, the contour of the transitional portion is given such great
emphasis that the radius of the domed panel, though generally specified within a range,
is not specified for the preferred embodiment.
[0015] As mentioned earlier, one of the problems is obtaining a maximum dome reversal pressure
for a given metal thickness. However, another problem is obtaining resistance to damage
when a filled container is dropped onto a hard surface. More particularly, this other
problem includes the resistance to structural damage as caused by the combination
of dropping the container onto a hard surface, together with the internal fluid pressure
in the container, the internal fluid pressure being a function of the type of beverage
and of the temperature thereof.
[0016] When containers are shipped in cardboard cartons, damage to the containers may be
obviated by the resilience of the carton material. However, if the material of the
carton is made thinner, or if the containers are shrink wrapped in plastic film rather
than being shipped in a cardboard container, the drop resistance of the containers
becomes as critical, or even more critical, than the dome reversal pressure.
[0017] Present industry testing for drop resistance is called the cumulative drop height.
In this test, a filled container is dropped onto a steel plate from heights beginning
at three inches and increasing by three inches for each successive drop. The drop
height resistance is then the sum of all the distances at which the container is dropped,
including the height at which the dome is reversed, or partially reversed. That is,
the drop height resistance is the cumulative height at which the bottom contour is
damaged sufficiently to preclude standing firmly upright on a flat surface.
[0018] Further, in the cumulative drop height test, the internal fluid pressure of the beverage
is closely controlled at an elevated pressure by controlling the temperature of the
beverage. Thus, failure of the container is caused by the combination of the stresses
induced by the internal fluid pressure and the impacts of repeated drop tests with
the inertial force of the fluid in the container.
[0019] As is known, a large quantity of containers are manufactured annually and the producers
thereof are always seeking to reduce the amount of metal utilized in making containers
while still maintaining the same operating characteristics.
[0020] Because of the large quantities of containers manufactured, a small reduction in
metal thickness, even of one-half of one thousandth of an inch, reduces manufacturing
costs substantially.
Summary of the Invention
[0021] According to the present invention, a drawn and ironed beverage container includes
an annular supporting portion that is disposed radially inwardly from the sidewall
of the container and that is disposed around and concentric to a vertical axis, a
domed panel, or concave panel, that is disposed inwardly of the annular supporting
portion, and an outer connecting portion that connects the annular supporting portion
to the sidewall.
[0022] The outer connecting portion includes a lower concave annular arcuate portion and
an upper convex annular arcuate portion that is connected to the lower concave annular
supporting portion and to the sidewall.
[0023] The annular supporting portion includes inner and outer convex annular portions which
preferably are arcuate and are disposed about the same center of curvature. The annular
supporting portion, and the inner and outer convex annular portions thereof, provide
an annular supporting surface for supporting the container on a flat and horizontal
surface, for providing means for nesting the containers when they are stacked.
[0024] The container includes an inner connecting portion that connects the domed panel,
or concave panel, to the annular supporting portion. The inner connecting portion
includes an inner concave annular portion that extends radially outward from the domed
panel and that curves downward toward the inner convex annular portion, and an inner
wall that is disposed circumferentially around the vertical axis, that connects the
inner concave annular portion to the inner convex annular portion, and that disposes
the domed panel at a positional distance above the annular supporting surface.
[0025] It has been discovered that by careful selection of the dimensions for the various
parameters, the strength of a container, as determined by the cumulative drop height
test, is increased to an unexpected magnitude.
[0026] In stark contrast to the prior art in which decreasing of the radius of curvature
of the domed panel was avoided because of a reduction in the static dome reversal
pressure of the container, in the present invention the radius of curvature of the
domed panel is reduced into a range wherein the static dome reversal pressure is degraded
to the point wherein the container would not perform satisfactorily.
[0027] This radical reduction in the radius of curvature of the domed panel produces not
only an entirely unacceptable reduction in the static dome reversal pressure, but
also produces a dramatic, and an unexpected increase in the cumulative drop height
resistance. This increase in the cumulative drop height resistance may be as much
as, or even more than, six hundred percent. And this tremendous improvement in the
cumulative drop height resistance is achieved with the same thickness of material.
[0028] As beneficial as this dramatically improved cumulative drop height resistance is,
the benefits are of no commercial value without accompanying means for obviating most,
or nearly all, of the detrimental decrease in the static dome reversal pressure that
accompanies the required reduction in the radius of curvature of the domed panel.
[0029] It has been by careful selection of various other parameters of the container, such
as the positional distance from the supporting surface to the domed panel and the
height of the inner wall of the inner connecting portion, that all, or nearly all,
of the reduction in the static dome reversal pressure can be obviated.
[0030] Moreover, if an improvement of less than a six hundred percent in cumulative drop
height resistance is acceptable, by careful selection of parameters, it is even possible
to increase the static dome reversal pressure of the container while obtaining an
excellent improvement in the cumulative drop height resistance.
[0031] In summary, the present invention provides a container with an excellent static dome
reversal pressure, an astoundingly increased cumulative drop height resistance, and
makes it possible for not only permitting the use of shrink wrap and other inexpensive
means in the place of cardboard for packaging containers, but also the possibility
of using thinner metal stock material for the containers and achieving a reduction
in material cost.
[0032] In the first three aspects of the present invention, a container includes a sidewall
that is disposed around a vertical axis, an annular supporting portion that is disposed
around the vertical axis, and that includes an annular supporting surface disposed
around the vertical axis and orthogonal thereto, an outer connecting portion that
interconnects the sidewall and the annular supporting portion, a concave panel that
is disposed inwardly from the annular supporting portion, and an inner connecting
portion that is connected to the annular supporting portion, that extends upwardly
into the container, that is connected to the concave panel, and that disposes the
concave panel at a positional distance above the supporting surface.
[0033] More particularly, in the first aspect of the present invention, the curvature of
the concave panel is increased into a range wherein dome reversal pressure of the
container is decreased with an increase in pressure, for increasing the cumulative
drop height resistance of the container.
[0034] In the second aspect of the present invention, the positional distance from the supporting
surface to the curved portion is increased to increase the dome reversal pressure
of the container.
[0035] In the third aspect of the present invention, the curvature of the concave panel
is reduced wherein the dome reversal pressure of the container is decreased with increases
in the curvature, for increasing the cumulative drop height resistance of the container,
and the positional distance from the supporting surface to the concave panel is increased
to at least partially prevent the increase in the curvature of the concave panel from
decreasing the dome reversal pressure of the container.
[0036] In the fourth and fifth aspects of the invention, a container includes a sidewall
that is substantially cylindrical and that is disposed concentrically around a vertical
axis, an annular supporting portion that includes an annular supporting surface orthogonal
to the vertical axis, and that includes a convex annular portion disposed around the
vertical axis curving inwardly and upwardly from the supporting surface, an outer
connecting portion that interconnects the sidewall and the supporting portion, a concave
panel that includes a substantially spherical contour and that is disposed radially
inwardly from the convex annular portion, a concave annular portion that is disposed
circumferentially around the concave panel, that is connected to the concave panel,
and that curves downwardly toward the convex annular portion, a circumferential inner
wall that is connected to the convex annular portion, that extends upwardly from the
convex annular portion, and that is connected to the concave annular portion.
[0037] More particularly, in the fourth aspect of the present invention, the radius of curvature
of the concave panel is reduced into a range wherein the dome reversal pressure of
the concave panel is decreased with decreases in the radius of curvature, for increasing
the cumulative drop height resistance of the container.
[0038] In the fifth aspect of the invention, the radius of curvature of the concave panel
is reduced into a range wherein the dome reversal pressure of the concave panel is
decreased with decreases in the radius of curvature, for increasing the cumulative
drop height resistance of the container, and the height of the inner wall is increased,
for increasing the dome reversal pressure of the concave panel.
[0039] In the fifth, sixth, and seventh aspects of the present invention, a method is provided
for increasing the strength of a container, in which the container includes a sidewall
that is disposed around a vertical axis, a supporting portion that is disposed around
the vertical axis and that includes an annular supporting surface disposed around
the vertical axis, an outer connecting portion that connects the sidewall to the supporting
surface, and a concave panel that is disposed inwardly from the annular supporting
portion, an inner connecting portion that is connected to the annular supporting portion,
that extends upwardly into the container, and that disposes the concave panel at a
positional distance above the supporting surface.
[0040] More particularly, in the fifth aspect of the invention, the cumulative drop resistance
of the container is increased by increasing the curvature of the concave panel, and
by limiting the increasing step to an allowable decrease in the dome reversal pressure.
[0041] In the sixth aspect of the invention, the dome reversal pressure of the container
is increased by increasing the positional distance from the supporting surface to
the concave panel.
[0042] In the seventh aspect of the invention, the dome reversal pressure and the cumulative
drop strength of a container are optimized by increasing the curvature of the domed
panel to a curvature in which the dome reversal pressure is reduced from that which
is produced by a smaller curvature, thereby increasing the cumulative drop strength,
and increasing the positional distance to at least partially compensate for the reduction
in the dome reversal pressure.
[0043] In an eighth and ninth aspect of the invention, a container includes a generally
cylindrical sidewall that has a first diameter and that is disposed circumferentially
around a vertical axis, an annular support that is disposed circumferentially around
the vertical axis, that is disposed radially inwardly from the sidewall, that includes
an outer convex annular portion, and that includes an inner convex annular portion
disposed radially inwardly from the outer convex annular portion and attached to the
outer convex annular portion, for supporting the container, an outer connecting portion
that includes an upper convex annular portion connected to the sidewall, that includes
a recessed annular portion disposed radially inwardly of a line tangent to the outer
convex annular portion and the upper convex annular portion, for connecting the sidewall
to the outer convex annular portion of the annular supporting means, a domed panel
that is generally spherically-shaped, that is disposed radially inwardly from the
annular supporting means, and that curves upwardly with respect to the vertical axis,
and an inner connecting portion that includes a circumferential inner wall extending
generally upwardly with respect to the vertical axis for connecting the domed panel
to the annular supporting means, and the domed panel has a dome radius that is smaller
than the mean diameter of the container.
[0044] Finally, in the tenth aspect of the present invention, a container capable of substantially
resisting dome reversal upon impact includes a structure with a seamless cylindrical
sidewall and a bottom wall integrally formed with the sidewall at the lower extremity
thereof, an outer connecting member that extends downwardly and inwardly from the
sidewall toward the vertical axis of the container, the outer connecting member including
an upper convex portion with an interior radius and a lower concave portion with an
exterior radius, the radii being substantially equal, an annular bottom member that
is integrally connected with and that extends downwardly from the lower concave portion
to provide a supporting means for the container, a frustoconical surface that integrally
connects with the annular bottom member and that extends upwardly and inwardly therefrom,
said frustoconical surface forming a slight angle with respect to the vertical axis
of the container, and a downwardly concave center panel that is integrally connected
with the frustoconical surface and that extends upwardly and inwardly from the frustoconical
surface, and the radius of curvature of the downwardly concave center panel being
substantially equal to or less than the diameter of the annular supporting surface.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0045]
FIGURE 1 is a front elevation of beverage containers that are bundled by shrink wrapping
with plastic film;
FIGURE 2 is a top view of the bundled beverage containers of FIGURE 1 taken substantially
as shown by view line 2-2 of FIGURE 1;
FIGURE 3 is a cross sectional elevation of the lower portion of one of the beverage
containers of FIGURES 1 and 2, showing details that are generally common to two prior
art designs;
FIGURE 4 is a cross sectional elevation of the lower portion of a beverage container,
showing details that are generally common to the preferred embodiments of the present
invention;
FIGURE 5 is a cross sectional elevation, showing, at an enlarged scale, details that
are generally common to both FIGURES 3 and 4;
FIGURE 6 is a graph of cumulative drop heights vs. both the radius of curvature of
the domed panel, and the ratio of the radius of curvature divided by the mean diameter
of the annular supporting portion, with the distance from the supporting surface to
the domed panel being constant;
FIGURE 7 is a graph of cumulative drop heights vs. both the radius of curvature of
the domed panel, and the ratio of the radius of curvature divided by the mean diameter
of the annular supporting portion, and is different from the graph of FIGURE 6 in
that parameters, such as the inner wall height have been selected to provide a constant
static dome reversal pressure;
FIGURE 8 is a graph of static dome reversal pressures vs. both the radius of curvature,
and the ratio of the radius of curvature divided by the mean diameter of the annular
supporting portion, with the dome height, that is, the distance from the supporting
surface to the domed panel, being constant; and
FIGURE 9 is a graph of static dome reversal pressure vs. both the radius of curvature
of the domed panel, and the ratio of the radius of curvature divided by the mean diameter
of the annular supporting portion.
Description of the Preferred Embodiments
[0046] Referring now to FIGURES 3, 4, and 5, these configurations are generally common to
Pulciani et al. in U.S. Patents 4,685,582 and 4,768,672 and 4,620,434, to a design
manufactured by the assignee of the present invention, and to embodiments of the present
invention. More particularly, FIGURE 3 is common to the aforesaid prior art, FIGURE
4 is common to two embodiments of the prior art, and FIGURE 5 shows some details of
FIGURES 3 and 4 in an enlarged scale.
[0047] Since the present invention differs from the prior art primarily by selection of
some of the parameters shown in FIGURES 3-5, the forthcoming description refers to
all of these drawings, except as stated otherwise; and some dimensions pertaining
to FIGURES 3 and 4 are placed only on FIGURE 5 in order to avoid crowding.
[0048] Continuing to refer to FIGURES 3-5, a drawn and ironed beverage container 10 includes
a generally cylindrical sidewall 12 that includes a first diameter D₁, and that is
disposed circumferentially around a vertical axis 14; and an annular supporting portion,
or annular supporting means, 16 that is disposed circumferentially around the vertical
axis 14, that is disposed radially inwardly from the sidewall 12, and that provides
an annular supporting surface 18 that coincides with a base line 19.
[0049] The annular supporting portion 16 includes an outer convex annular portion 20 that
preferably is arcuate, and an inner convex annular portion 22 that preferably is arcuate,
that is disposed radially inwardly from the outer convex annular portion 20, and that
is connected to the outer convex annular portion 20. The outer and inner convex annular
portions, 20 and 22, have radii R₁ and R₂ whose centers of curvature are common. More
particularly, the radii R₁ and R₂ both have centers of curvature of a point 24, and
of a circle of revolution 26 of the point 24. The circle of revolution 26 has a second
diameter D₂.
[0050] An outer connecting portion, or outer connecting means, 28 includes an upper convex
annular portion 30 that is preferably arcuate, that includes a radius of R₃, and that
is connected to the sidewall 12. The outer connecting portion 28 also includes a recessed
annular portion 32 that is disposed radially inwardly of a line 34, or a frustoconical
surface of revolution 36, that is tangent to the outer convex annular portion 20 and
the upper convex annular portion 30. Thus, the outer connecting means 28 connects
the sidewall 12 to the outer convex annular portion 20.
[0051] A domed panel, or concave panel, 38 is preferably spherically-shaped, but may be
of any suitable curved shape, has a radius of curvature, or dome radius, R₄, is disposed
radially inwardly from the annular supporting portion 16, and curves upwardly into
the container 10. That is, the domed panel 38 curves upwardly proximal to the vertical
axis 14 when the container 10 is in an upright position.
[0052] The container 10 further includes an inner connecting portion, or inner connecting
means, 40 having a circumferential inner wall, or cylindrical inner wall, 42 with
a height L₁ that extends upwardly with respect to the vertical axis 14 that may be
cylindrical, or that may be frustoconical and slope inwardly toward said vertical
axis 14 at an angle α₁. The inner connecting portion 40 also includes an inner concave
annular portion 44 that has a radius R₅, and that interconnects the inner wall 42
and the domed panel 38. Thus, the inner connecting portion 40 connects the domed panel
38 to the annular supporting portion 16.
[0053] The inner connecting portion 40 positions a periphery 45 of the domed panel 38 at
a positional distance L₂ above the base line 19. As can be seen by inspection of FIGURE
5, the positional distance L₂ is approximately equal to, but is somewhat less than,
the sum of the height L₁ of the inner wall 42, the radius of curvature R₅ of the inner
concave annular portion 44, the radius R₂ of the inner convex annular portion 22,
and the thickness of the material at the inner convex annular portion 22.
[0054] As seen by inspection and as can be calculated by trigonometry, the positional distance
L₂ is less than the aforementioned sum by a function of the angle α₁, and as a function
of an angle α₃ at which the periphery 45 of the domed panel 38 is connected to the
inner concave annular portion 44.
[0055] For example, if the radius R₅ of the inner concave annular portion 44 is 1,27 mm
(0.050 inches), if the radius R₂ of the inner convex annular portion 22 is 1,016 mm
(0.040 inches), and if the thickness of the material at the inner convex annular portion
22 is about 0,305 mm (0.012 inches), then the positional distance L₂ is about, but
somewhat less than 2,591 mm (0.102 inches) more than the height L₁ of the inner wall
42.
[0056] Thus, with radii and metal thickness as noted above, when the height L₁ of the inner
wall 42 is 1.524 mm (0.060 inches), the positional distance L₂ is about, but a little
less than, 4,115 mm (0.162 inches).
[0057] The annular supporting portion 16 has an arithmetical mean diameter D₃ that occurs
at the junction of the outer convex annular portion 20 and the inner convex annular
portion 22. Thus, the mean diameter D₃ and the diameter D₂ of the circle 26 are the
same diameter. The dome radius R₄ is on the vertical axis 14.
[0058] The recessed annular portion 32 includes a circumferential outer wall 46 that extends
upwardly from the outer convex annular portion 20 and outwardly 5 away from said vertical
axis by an angle α₂, and includes a lower concave annular portion 48 with a radius
R₆. Further, the recessed annular portion 32 may, according to the selected magnitudes
of the angle α₂, the radius R₃, and the radius R₆, include a lower part of the upper
convex annular portion 30.
[0059] Finally, the container 10 includes a dome height, or panel height, H₁ as measured
from the supporting surface 18 to the domed panel 38, and a post diameter, or smaller
diameter, D₄, of the inner wall 42. The upper convex annular portion 30 is tangent
to the sidewall 12, and has a center 50. The center 50 is at a height H₂ above the
supporting surface 18. A center 52 of the lower concave annular portion 48 is on a
diameter D₅. The center 52 is below the supporting surface 18. More specifically,
the supporting surface 18 is at a distance H₃ above the center 52.
[0060] Referring now to FIGURES 3 and 5, in the prior art embodiment of the three aforesaid
patents, the following dimensions were used: D₁ = 2.597 inches; D₂, D₃ = 50,8 mm (2.000
inches); D₅ = 60,071 mm (2.365 inches); R₁, R₂ = 1,016 mm (0.040 inches); R₃ = 5,08
mm (0.200 inches); R₄ = 60,325 mm (2.375 inches); R₅ = 1,27 mm (0.050 inches); R₆
= 2,54 mm (0.100 inches); and α₁ = less than 5°. It should be noted that although
R₄ is 60,325 mm (2.375 inches), the actual radius therefor was 53,848 mm (2.12 inches).
[0061] Referring again to FIGURES 3 and 5, in the prior art embodiment of the assignee to
the present invention, the following dimensions were used : D₁ = 65,989 mm (2.598
inches); D₂, D₃ = 50,8 mm (2.000 inches); D₄ = 47,803 mm (1.882 inches); D₅ = 63,723
mm (2.509 inches); R₁, R₂ = 1,016 mm (0.040 inches); R₃ = 5,08 mm (0.200 inches);
R₄ = 60,325 mm (2.375 inches); R₅ = 1,27 mm (0.050 inches); R₆ = 5,08 mm (0.200 inches);
H₁ = 9,779 mm (0.385 inches); H₂ = 9,398 mm (0.370 inches); H₃ = 0,203 mm (0.008 inches);
α₁ = 5° 9'; and α₂ = 30°. It should be noted that although R₄ is 60,325 mm (2.375
inches), the actual tooling radius therefor was 53,848 mm (2.12 inches).
[0062] Referring now to FIGURES 4 and 5, in tests run in conjunction with the present invention,
the following dimensions were used: D₁ = 65,989 mm (2.598 inches); D₂, D₃ = 50,8 mm
(2.000 inches); D₅ = 63,723 mm (2.509 inches); R₁, R₂ = 1,016 mm (0.040 inches); R₃
= 5,08 mm (0.200 inches); R₅ = 1,27 mm (0.050 inches); R₆ = 5,08 mm (0.200 inches);
H₂ = 9,398 mm (0.370 inches); H₃ = 0,203 mm 0.008 inches; and α₂ = 30°.
[0063] The other dimensions such as R₄, D₄, H₁, α₁, L₁ and the thickness of material which
were used in the tests, are as specified in the tables which are included herein,
together with the test results thereof.
[0064] In each of the tables, the static dome reversal pressure (S.D.R) is in pounds per
square inch one pound per square inch being 0,0068947 N/mm², the cumulative drop height
(C.D.H.) is in inches one inch being 25,4 mm, and the internal pressure (I.P.) at
which the cumulative drop height tests were run is in pounds per square inch one pound
per square inch being 0,0068947 N/mm².
[0065] Referring now to Tables 1-10, the radius of curvature R₄ of the domed panel 38, as
specified in the tables, is the actual radius of curvature of the container, as measured,
not the radius of curvature of the domer tooling. For instance, a radius of curvature
R₄ of 60,325mm (2.375 inches), is made with a tool that has a radius of 53,848 mm
(2.120 inches). This difference in radius of curvature for the actual container and
the tooling is true for both the three aforementioned patents and the prior art embodiments
of the assignee of the subject invention.
[0066] More particularly, in Tables 1-10 the following Table A comparison between tooling
radius and the actual dome radius R4 of the containers.

[0067] Therefore, in the tables, a radius of curvature R₄ of 60,325 mm (2.375 inches) compares
to the prior art of FIGURES 3 and 4, in which the radius of the domer tooling was
53,848 mm (2.120 inches); and the improvements of the present invention, at other
radii of curvature, can be seen as a comparison to an R₄ of 60,325 mm (2.375 inches).
[0068] The tests of Tables 1-10 were run with two thickness of metal, as specified. The
0,2997 mm (0.0118 inch) thickness is the standard gauge for use in the United States;
and the 0,3226 mm (0.0127 inch) thickness is used for special orders, particularly
for use outside the United States. All of the test material was aluminum alloy which
is designated as 3104 H19, and the test material was taken from production stock.
[0069] The cumulative drop heights in the tables represent the average of eighteen tests,
and the static dome reversal pressures represent the average of ten tests. The internal
fluid pressures in each container prior to dropping is shown in the table for each
drop test.
[0070] The purpose for the cumulative drop height is to determine the cumulative drop height
at which a filled can exhibits partial or total reversal of the domed panel.
[0071] The procedure is as follows: 1) warm the product in the containers to 32,22 ± 1,11
degrees Celsius (90 degrees, plus or minus 2 degrees, Fahrenheit); 2) position the
tube of the drop height tester to 5 degrees from vertical to achieve consistent container
drops; 3) insert the container from the top of the tube, lower it to the 76,2 mm (3
inch) position, and support the container with a finger; 4) allow the container to
free-fall and strike the steel base; 4) repeat the test at heights that successively
increase by 76,2 mm (3 inch) increments; 5) feel the domed panel to check for any
bulging or "reversal" of the domed panel before testing at the next height; 6) record
the height at which dome reversal occurs; 7) calculate the cumulative drop height,
that is, add each height at which a given container has been dropped, including the
height at which dome reversal occurs; and 8) average the results from 10 containers.
[0072] One beverage producer has proposed that containers supplied to that company have
a minimum cumulative drop height resistance of 1524 mm (60 inches). Heretofore, container
manufacturers have been unable to achieve this cumulative drop height resistance.
Therefore, it is unknown whether an industry standard of 1524 mm (60 inches), 762
mm (30 inches), or merely 508 mm (20 inches), will be adopted. Further, it is not
certain that any industry standard will be adopted.
[0074] Referring now to Table 1, it will be noticed that the numbers in columns three and
four correspond exactly to the numbers in columns one and two. The reason for this
is that the object in the tests for columns three and four was to vary the dome depths
to match the static dome reversal of the prior art of FIGURE 4. Since the parameters
of Table 1 are the same as that of the prior art of FIGURE 4, the numbers in columns
three and four are identical to those in columns one and two.
[0075] Continuing to refer to Table 1, and test results for the prior art configuration
of FIGURE 4, the cumulative drop heights were 127 mm (5.0 inches) and 444,5 mm (17.5
inches), for metal thicknesses of 0,2997 mm (0.0118 inches) and 0,3226 mm (0.0127
inches), respectively, and with internal pressures of 0,43023 N/mm² (62.4 pounds per
square inch) and 0,42058 N/mm² (61.0 pounds per square inch), respectively. Notice
that the static dome reversal pressures were 0,66051 and 0,76462 N/mm² (95.8 and 110.9
pounds per square inch) for the two metal thicknesses.
[0076] It is important to remember that the radius of curvature of the domed panel for Table
1, as listed, is 60,325 mm (2.375 inches), and that this is the actual radius of curvature
for prior art in which the domer tooling radius is 53,848 mm 2.120 inches.
[0077] Referring now to Table 10, in stark contrast to test results on the prior art embodiment
of Table 1, with a dome radius R₄ of 44,45 mm (1.750 inches) of the container, and
with a post diameter D₄ of 47,93 mm (1.887 inches) for the same two metal thicknesses,
0,2997 mm (0.0118 inches) and 0,3226 mm (.0127 inches), and for internal pressures
of 0,4385 N/mm² (63.6 psi) and 0,41644 N/mm² (60.4 psi), respectively, the cumulative
drop heights of the present invention were 1867 mm (73.5 inches) and 3497,6 mm (137.7
inches), respectively, as shown in columns one and two. Notice that the static dome
reversal pressures were 0,57433 N/mm² (83.3 psi) and 0,67982 N/mm² (98.6 psi), respectively.
[0078] That is, the present invention increased the cumulative drop height by more than
fourteen times, from 127 mm (5.0 inches) to 1867 mm (73.5 inches) for the thinner
stock, and by nearly eight times, from 444,5 mm (17.5 inches) to 3497,6 mm (137.7
inches) for the thicker stock.
[0079] However, referring to Tables 1 and 10, this dramatic increase in the cumulative drop
height was accompanied by an undesirably large decrease in the static dome reversal
pressures. The dome reversal pressures reduced from 0,66051 N/mm² (95.8 psi) and 0,76462
N/mm² (110.9 psi), respectively, for the thinner and the thicker stock in Table 1,
to 0,57433 N/mm² (83.3 psi) and 0,67982 N/mm² (98.6 psi), respectively, for the thinner
and the thicker stock of Table 10.
[0080] The present invention provides means for obviating, or at least ameliorating, this
decrease in the static dome reversal pressure that accompanies the dramatic increase
in the cumulative drop height.
[0081] Referring now to Table 1 and to columns three and four of Table 10, the present invention
increased the cumulative drop height from 127 mm (5.0 inches) and 444,5 mm (17.5 inches),
respectively, to 1778 mm (70.0 inches) and 3454,4 mm (136.0 inches), respectively
for the thinner and the thicker stock. Therefore, the present invention increased
the cumulative drop height by fourteen times for the thinner stock and by almost eight
times for the thicker stock.
[0082] At the same time, by increasing the height L₁ of the inner wall 42, from 0,889 mm
(0.035 inches) to 2,032 mm (0.080 inches) for the thinner stock and 1,905 mm (0.075
inches) for the thicker stock, the containers had a static dome reversal pressure
of 0,63018 N/mm² (91.4 psi) and 0,73704 N/mm² (106.9 psi) respectively.
[0083] Therefore, increasing the height L₁ of the inner wall 42 limited the reduction in
the static dome reversal pressure to less than 5 percent for the thinner stock, and
by 4 percent for the thicker stock, while achieving increases in the cumulative drop
height by about eight to fourteen times, depending upon the metal thickness.
[0084] Referring now to FIGURE 9, cumulative drop heights and static dome reversal pressures
are shown for various radii of curvature R₄ of the domed panel 38, and for various
ratios of radii of curvature R₄ to the mean diameter D₃ of the annular supporting
portion 16.
[0085] Notice that in FIGURE 9, with increased heights L₁ of the inner wall 42, it is possible
to obtain phenomenal, but not maximum, increases in the cumulative drop heights without
decreasing the static dome reversal pressure below that which was achieved by the
prior art.
[0086] Or, refering now to Tables 1 and 8, notice that the prior art static dome reversal
pressures of 95.8 and 110.9 (0,66051 N/mm² (95.8 psi) and 0,76462 N/mm² (110.9 psi))
of Table 1, are exceeded by the static dome reversal pressures of 96.0 and 111.0 (0,66189
N/mm² (96.0 psi) and 0,76531 N/mm² (111.0 psi)) of Table 1, and that increases in
cumulative drop height from 127 mm (5.0 inches) to 1122,7 mm (44.2 inches), and from
444,5 mm (17.5 inches) to 2263,1 mm (89.1 inches), respectively, are achieved.
[0087] Therefore, in the present invention, highly significant increases in the cumulative
drop heights can be achieved without any reduction in static dome reversal pressures.
[0088] Furthermore, it is believed that further improvement is possible by varying such
parameters as the angle α₁ of the inner wall 42, and the height L₁ of the inner wall;
because the test results submitted herein indicate that increasing the height L₁ increases
the static dome reversal pressure, and decreasing the angle α₁ of the inner wall 42
increases the static dome reversal pressures.
[0089] Referring now to FIGURE 6 and Table 11, the test data of Tables 1-10 has been rearranged
in Table 11 to show variations in test results when the dome height H₁ is kept constant;
and in FIGURE 6, the data of Table 11 is plotted to show the cumulative drop heights
vs. the radius of curvature R₄ for tests wherein the dome height H₁ is kept constant
at 9,779 mm (0.385 inches).
[0090] It should be noted that in Tables 11 and 12, the designation B6A denotes a container
made in accordance with the dimensions presently given for the prior art container
of the assignee of the subject invention. the other container designations (e.g.,
X0133) refer to experimental drawing numbers of various experimental tools.
[0091] In like manner, referring now to FIGURE 7 and Table 12, the test data of Tables 1-10
has been rearranged in Table 12 to show variations in test results when the dome height
H₁ is varied to maintain a constant, or nearly constant, static dome reversal pressure
of 0,66189 N/mm² (96 psi) for the 0,2997 mm (0.0118 inches) stock thickness and 0,76531
N/mm² (111 psi) for the 0,3226 mm (0.0127 inches) stock thickness. In FIGURE 7, the
data of Table 12 is plotted to show the cumulative drop heights vs. the radius of
curvature R₄ for tests wherein the static dome reversal pressure is kept constant,
or nearly constant, as noted for Table 12.
[0092] Referring now to FIGURE 8, the static dome reversal pressures are plotted for various
radii of curvature R₄ of the domed panel 38, and for various ratios of radii of curvature
R₄ to the mean diameter D₃ of the annular supporting portion 16. In the curves of
FIGURE 8, the dome height H₁, that is, the distance from the supporting surface 18
to the domed panel 38 along the axis 14, is kept constant at 9,779 mm (0.385 inches).
[0093] In summary, the present invention yields unexpected results. It is believed that
one skilled in the art would not have anticipated that a decrease in the dome radius
R₄ would achieve such a remarkable increase in cumulative drop strengths. Moreover,
it is believed that there is no hint in the prior art that any increase in cumulative
drop strength can be achieved by a reduction in the dome radius R₄ as disclosed and
claimed herein.
[0094] In addition, being able to reduce, or to obviate, the reduction in static dome reversal
pressures that accompanies this phenomenal increase in cumulative drop heights, or
even being able to increase the static dome reversal pressure, by increasing the height
L₁ of the inner wall 42 constitutes unexpected results.
[0095] In order to better understand the claims, it should be recognized that increasing
the height L₁ of the inner wall 42, for a given radius of curvature R₄ of the domed
panel 38, increases the dome height H₁.
[0096] Therefore, reciting an increase in the dome height H₁, or a limit thereof, is one
way of reciting an increase in, or a limit of, the height L₁ of the inner wall 42.
[0097] Further, it should be recognized that increasing the height L₁ of the inner wall
42 increases the positional distance L₂.
[0098] Therefore, reciting an increase in the positional distance L₂, or a limit thereof,
is one way of reciting an increase in, or a limit of, the height L₁ of the inner wall
42.
[0099] Further, it should be understood that reciting the positional distance L₂ distinctly
defines dimensions, or limits, of the present invention without regard to the size
or shape of the inner convex annular portion 22, the size or shape of the inner concave
annular portion 44, the shape or inclination of the inner wall 42, or the thickness
of the metal.
[0100] Finally, the present invention provides these remarkable and unexpected improvements
by means and method as recited in the aspects of the invention which are included
herein.
[0101] Although aluminum containers have been investigated, it is believed that the same
principles, namely decreasing the dome radius R₄, increasing the height L₁ of the
inner wall 42, increasing the dome height H₁, increasing the positional distance L₂
from the supporting surface 18 to the domed panel 38, and selecting, and/or minimizing
the angle α₁ of the inner wall 42, would be effective to increase the strength of
containers made from other materials, including ferrous and nonferrous metals, plastic
and other nonmetallic materials.
[0102] Referring finally to FIGURES 1 and 2, upper ones of the containers 10 stack onto
lower ones of the containers 10 with the outer connecting portions 28 of the upper
ones of the containers 10 nested inside double-seamed tops 56 of lower ones of the
containers 10; and both adjacently disposed and vertically stacked containers 10 are
bundled into a package 58 by the use of a shrink-wrap plastic 60.
[0103] While this method of packaging is more economical than the previous method of boxing,
possible damage due to rough handling becomes a problem, so that the requirements
for cumulative drop resistances of the containers 10 is more stringent. It is this
problem that the present invention addresses and solves.
[0104] While specific methods and apparatus have been disclosed in the preceding description,
it should be understood that these specifics have been given for the purpose of disclosing
the principles of the present invention and that many variations thereof will become
apparent to those who are versed in the art. Therefore, the scope of the present invention
is to be determined by the appended claims.
Industrial Applicability
[0105] The present invention is applicable to containers made of aluminum and various other
materials. More particularly, the present invention is applicable to beverage containers
of the type having a seamless, drawn and ironed, cylindrically-shaped body, and an
integral bottom with an annular supporting portion.
[0106] The invention may be summarized as follows:
[0107] A container having increased cumulative drop height resistance, which container comprises:
a sidewall being disposed around a vertical axis;
an annular supporting portion being disposed around said vertical axis and having
an annular supporting surface;
an outer connecting portion interconnecting said sidewall and said annular supporting
portion;
a concave panel being disposed inwardly from said annular supporting portion; and
an inner connecting portion being connected to said annular supporting portion,
extending upwardly and toward said vertical axis, being connected to said concave
panel, said concave panel being disposed a positional distance above said supporting
surface;
said concave panel having a preselected curvature wherein the static dome reversal
pressure of said container is decreased.
[0108] A container in which said supporting surface includes an arithmetical mean diameter;
said preselected curvature includes at least a portion that is substantially spherical
about a radius of curvature; and
said radius of curvature of said spherical portion is less than about 105 percent
of said mean diameter.
[0109] A container in which said supporting surface includes an arithmetical mean diameter;
and
said decrease in said dome reversal pressure is at least partially obviated by
said positional distance being more than about 8 percent of said arithmetical mean
diameter.
[0110] A container in which said supporting surface includes an arithmetical mean diameter;
said container includes a panel height as measured along said axis from said supporting
surface to said concave panel; and
said decrease in said static dome reversal pressure is at least partially obviated
by said panel height being more than about 20 percent of said mean diameter.
[0111] A container in which said sidewall is substantially cylindrical;
said preselected curvature includes at least a portion that is substantially spherical
about a radius of curvature; and
said radius of curvature is less than about 80 percent of the diameter of said
sidewall.
[0112] A container in which said sidewall is substantially cylindrical; and
said decrease in said static dome reversal pressure is at least partially obviated
by said positional distance being more than about 6.2 percent of the diameter of said
sidewall.
[0113] A container in which said sidewall is substantially cylindrical;
said container includes a panel height as measured along said axis from said supporting
surface to said concave panel; and
said decrease in said static dome reversal pressure is at least partially obviated
by said panel height being more than about 15.0 percent of the diameter of said sidewall.
[0114] A container in which said supporting surface includes an arithmetical mean diameter;
said container includes a panel height as measured along said axis from said supporting
surface to said concave panel;
said preselected curvature includes at least a portion that is substantially spherical
about a radius of curvature;
said radius of curvature of said spherical portion is less than about 105 percent
of said mean diameter; and
said decrease in said static dome reversal pressure is at least partially obviated
by said panel height being more than about 20 percent of said mean diameter.
[0115] A container in which said sidewall is substantially cylindrical;
said container includes a panel height as measured along said axis from said supporting
surface to said concave panel;
said preselected curvature includes at least a portion that is substantially spherical
about a radius of curvature;
said preselected curvature comprises said radius of curvature being less than about
80 percent of the diameter of said sidewall; and
said decrease in said static dome reversal pressure is at least partially obviated
by said panel height being more than about 16.0 percent of said sidewall diameter.
[0116] A container having increased cumulative drop height resistance, which container comprises:
a sidewall being disposed around a vertical axis;
an annular supporting portion being disposed around said vertical axis, and having
an annular supporting surface that is disposed around said vertical axis and that
is orthogonal thereto;
an outer connecting portion interconnecting said sidewall and said annular supporting
portion;
a concave panel being disposed inwardly from said annular supporting portion;
an inner connecting portion being connected to said annular supporting portion,
extending upwardly into said container, being connected to said concave panel, and
disposing said concave panel a positional distance above said supporting surface;
and
said concave panel having a preselected curvature wherein the static dome reversal
pressure of said container is decreased.
[0117] A container in which said annular supporting surface includes an arithmetical mean
diameter; and
said positional distance is more than about 8 percent of said mean diameter.
[0118] A container in which said sidewall is substantially cylindrical; and
said positional distance is more than about 6.2 percent of the diameter of said
sidewall.
[0119] A container in which said annular supporting surface includes an arithmetical mean
diameter;
said container includes a panel height as measured from said supporting surface
along said axis to said concave panel; and
said positional distance comprises said panel height being more than about 20 percent
of said mean diameter.
[0120] A container in which said container includes a panel height as measured from said
supporting surface along said axis to said concave panel; and
said positional distance comprises said panel height being more than about 15 percent
of the diameter of said sidewall.
[0121] A container in which said annular supporting surface includes an arithmetical mean
diameter;
said container includes a panel height as measured from said supporting surface
along said axis to said concave panel; and
said positional distance is more than about 8 percent of said mean diameter and
said panel height is more than about 20 percent of said mean diameter.
[0122] A container in which said sidewall is substantially cylindrical;
said container includes a panel height as measured from said supporting surface
along said axis to said concave panel;
said positional distance is more than about 6.2 percent of the diameter of said
sidewall; and
said positional distance comprises said panel height being more than about 15 percent
of said diameter of said sidewall.
[0123] A container having increased drop height resistance, which container comprises:
a sidewall being disposed around a vertical axis;
an annular supporting portion being disposed around said vertical axis and having
an annular supporting surface;
an outer connecting portion interconnecting said sidewall and said annular supporting
portion;
a concave panel being disposed inwardly from said annular supporting portion;
an inner connecting portion being connected to said annular supporting portion,
extending upwardly into said container, being connected to said concave panel, said
concave panel being disposed a positional distance above said supporting surface;
said concave panel having a preselected curvature wherein the static dome reversal
pressure of said container is decreased; and
means, comprising said positional distance, for at least partially preventing said
preselected curvature of said concave panel from decreasing said static dome reversal
pressure of said container.
[0124] A container in which said supporting surface includes an arithmetical mean diameter;
said preselected curvature includes at least a portion that is substantially spherical
about a radius of curvature; and
said radius of curvature is less than about 105 percent of said mean diameter.
[0125] A container in which said supporting surface includes an arithmetical mean diameter;
and
said positional distance is more than about 8.1 percent of said arithmetical mean
diameter.
[0126] A container in which said sidewall is substantially cylindrical;
said preselected curvature includes at least a portion that is substantially spherical
about a radius of curvature; and
said radius of curvature is less than about 80 percent of the diameter of said
sidewall.
[0127] A container in which said sidewall is substantially cylindrical; and
said positional distance is more than about 6.2 percent of the diameter of said
sidewall.
[0128] A container in which said supporting surface includes an arithmetical mean diameter;
said container includes a panel height as measured along said axis from said supporting
surface to said concave panel; and
said positional distance comprises said panel height being more than about 20 percent
of said mean diameter.
[0129] A container in which said sidewall is substantially cylindrical;
said container includes a panel height as measured along said axis from said supporting
surface to said concave panel; and
said positional distance comprises said panel height being more than about 15 percent
of the diameter of said sidewall.
[0130] A container having increased cumulative drop height resistance, which container comprises:
a sidewall being substantially cylindrical, and being disposed concentrically around
a vertical axis;
an annular supporting portion comprising an annular supporting surface that is
orthogonal to said vertical axis, and comprising a convex annular portion that is
disposed around said vertical axis and that curves inwardly and upwardly from said
supporting surface;
an outer connecting portion interconnecting said sidewall and said annular supporting
portion;
a concave panel having a substantially spherical contour and being disposed radially
inwardly from said convex annular portion;
a concave annular portion being disposed circumferentially around said concave
panel, being connected to said concave panel, and curving downwardly toward said convex
annular portion;
a circumferential inner wall being connected to said convex annular portion, extending
upwardly therefrom, and being connected to said concave annular portion; and
said concave panel having a preselected radius of curvature in the range wherein
the static dome reversal pressure of said concave panel is decreased with decreases
in said radius of curvature.
[0131] A container in which said preselected radius of curvature of said spherical contour
is less than about 2.1 inches.
[0132] A container in which said decrease in said static dome reversal pressure is at least
partially obviated by said inner wall being more than about 0.08 inches.
[0133] A container in which said container includes a panel height as measured along said
axis from said supporting surface to said concave panel;
said decrease in said static dome reversal pressure is at least partially obviated
by a selected height of said inner wall; and
said selected height of said inner wall comprises said panel height being more
than about 0.39 inches.
[0134] A container in which said container includes a panel height as measured along said
axis from said supporting surface to said concave panel;
said decrease in said static dome reversal pressure is at least partially obviated
by said inner wall having a selected height of more than about 0.08 inches; and
said selected height of said inner wall comprises said panel height being more
than about 0.39 inches.
[0135] A container in which said preselected radius of curvature of said spherical contour
is less than about 2.1 inches; and
said static dome reversal pressure is at least partially obviated by said inner
wall being more than about 0.08 inches.
[0136] A container in which said preselected radius of curvature of said spherical contour
is less than about 2.1 inches;
said container includes a panel height as measured along said axis from said supporting
surface to said concave panel;
said decrease in said static dome reversal pressure is at least partially obviated
by a selected height of said inner wall; and
said selected height of said inner wall comprises said panel height being more
than about 0.39 inches.
[0137] A container in which the radius of curvature of said spherical portion is less than
about 2.1 inches;
said container includes a panel height as measured along said axis from said supporting
surface to said concave panel;
said decrease in said static dome reversal pressure is at least partially obviated
by said inner wall having a selected height of more than about 0.08 inches; and
said selected height of said inner wall comprises said panel height being more
than about 0.39 inches.
[0138] A container in which said inner wall is substantially frustoconical and comprises
a smaller diameter that is distal from said supporting surface; and
said frustoconical inner wall slopes inwardly toward said axis by an angle of between
about 0 and 5 degrees.
[0139] A container in which said container includes a panel height as measured along said
axis from said supporting surface to said concave panel of between about 0.38 and
0.44 inches.
[0140] A container in which said inner wall has a height that is between about 0.06 and
0.1 inches.
[0141] A container in which said inner wall has a height that is between about 0.06 and
0.1 inches; and
said container includes a panel height as measured along said axis from said supporting
surface to said concave panel of between about 0.38 and .44 inches.
[0142] A container with increased cumulative drop height resistance, which container comprises:
a sidewall being substantially cylindrical, and being disposed concentrically around
a vertical axis;
an annular supporting portion comprising an annular supporting surface that is
orthogonal to said vertical axis, and comprising a convex annular portion that is
disposed around said vertical axis and that curves inwardly and upwardly from said
supporting surface;
an outer connecting portion interconnecting said sidewall and said annular supporting
portion;
a concave panel having a substantially spherical contour and being disposed radially
inwardly from said convex annular portion;
a concave annular portion being disposed circumferentially around said concave
panel, being connected to said concave panel, and curving downwardly toward said convex
annular portion; and
a circumferential inner wall being connected to said convex annular portion, extending
upwardly therefrom, and being connected to said concave annular portion;
said concave panel having a preselected radius of curvature in the range wherein
static dome reversal pressure of said concave panel is decreased with decreases in
said radius of curvature; and
said inner wall having a selected height for increasing the dome reversal pressure
of said concave panel.
[0143] A container in which said supporting surface includes an arithmetical mean diameter;
and
said spherical contour includes a radius of curvature that is between about 85
and 105 percent of said mean diameter.
[0144] A container in which said supporting surface includes an arithmetical mean diameter;
and
said selected height of said inner wall is between about 4 and 5 percent of said
arithmetical mean diameter.
[0145] A container in which said sidewall is substantially cylindrical; and
said spherical contour includes a radius of curvature that is between 6 and 8 percent
of the diameter of said sidewall.
[0146] A container in which said sidewall is substantially cylindrical; and
said selected height of said inner wall is between about 3 and 3.7 percent of the
diameter of said sidewall.
[0147] A container in which said supporting surface includes an arithmetical mean diameter;
said container includes a panel height as measured along said axis from said supporting
surface to said concave panel; and
said selected height of said inner wall comprises said panel height being between
about 19 and 22 percent of said mean diameter.
[0148] A container in which said sidewall is substantially cylindrical; and
said container includes a panel height as measured along said axis from said supporting
surface to said concave panel between about 14 and 16.3 percent of the diameter of
said sidewall.
[0149] A method for increasing the cumulative drop height resistance of a container, in
which said container includes a sidewall being disposed around a vertical axis, an
annular supporting portion being disposed around said vertical axis and having an
annular supporting surface that is disposed around said vertical axis, an outer connecting
portion connecting said sidewall to said supporting surface, and a concave panel being
disposed inwardly from said annular supporting portion, an inner connecting portion
being connected to said annular supporting portion, extending upwardly into said container,
and disposing said concave panel at a positioned distance above said supporting surface,
and in which said method comprises:
increasing the curvature of said concave panel to increase said cumulative drop
height resistance of said container; and
limiting said increasing step to an allowable decrease in static dome reversal
pressure.
[0150] A method which comprises forming said supporting surface with an arithmetical mean
diameter, and forming said concave panel with at least a portion thereof that is substantially
spherical and that has a radius of curvature; and
said increasing step comprises decreasing said radius of curvature to less than
about 105 percent of said mean diameter.
[0151] A method which comprises forming said sidewall substantially cylindrical, and forming
said concave panel with at least a portion thereof that is substantially spherical
and that has a radius of curvature; and
said increasing step comprises decreasing said radius of curvature to less than
about 78 percent of the diameter of said sidewall.