| (19) |
 |
|
(11) |
EP 0 453 076 B1 |
| (12) |
EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION |
| (45) |
Mention of the grant of the patent: |
|
07.06.1995 Bulletin 1995/23 |
| (22) |
Date of filing: 05.03.1991 |
|
|
| (54) |
Plasma blasting method
Plasmasprengverfahren
Méthode de tirage au plasma
|
| (84) |
Designated Contracting States: |
|
AT CH DE FR GB IT LI SE |
| (30) |
Priority: |
20.04.1990 CA 2015102
|
| (43) |
Date of publication of application: |
|
23.10.1991 Bulletin 1991/43 |
| (73) |
Proprietor: NORANDA INC. |
|
Toronto
Ontario, M5L 1B6 (CA) |
|
| (72) |
Inventors: |
|
- Kitzinger, Frank
Montreal,
Quebec, H3H 1V2 (CA)
- Nantel, Jacques
Pointe Claire,
Quebec, H9R 1K1 (CA)
|
| (74) |
Representative: Thomas, Roger Tamlyn et al |
|
D. Young & Co.
21 New Fetter Lane London EC4A 1DA London EC4A 1DA (GB) |
| (56) |
References cited: :
US-A- 3 158 207 US-A- 3 679 007
|
US-A- 3 583 766
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European
patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to
the European patent
granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall
not be deemed to
have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent
Convention).
|
[0001] This invention relates to a plasma blasting process for fragmenting a substance such
as rock and more particularly for hard rock mining.
[0002] The traditional method of hard rock mining is a batch process with the following
sequence: Holes are drilled in the rock, chemical explosives placed into the holes,
and the mine personnel evacuated; then the explosives are detonated, causing a quantity
of rock to be separated from the solid rock mass; gases generated by the explosives
are then ventilated out before the miners can return.
[0003] Over the years many attempts were made to improve efficiency of hard rock mining,
by continuously working the ore face, chipping away the rock in smaller chunks. In
general, continuous mechanical mining machinery is suitable for softer, more easily
workable rock types only.
[0004] Electrical methods for hard rock fragmentation were tried by several researchers.
One such technique is electrohydraulic crushing which was tested as early as 1905
by Svedberg. He produced colloidal metallic suspensions by capacitor discharge in
a liquid as reported by B.K. Parekh, et al. in an article entitled "Novel Comminution
Process Uses Electric and Ultrasonic Energy", Mining Engineering, September 1984,
pages 1305-1309. The electrohydraulic effect and its potential application in rock
fragmentation has been extensively studied by H.K. Kutter and published by the U.S.
Bureau of Mines in 1969 (see Report of Investigations 7317 entitled "The Electrohydraulic
Effect: Potential Application in Rock Fragmentation"). Additional publications on
the electrohydraulic effect can be found in Engineering and Mining Journal, Volume
62 (2) 1961, pages 134 to 140 where an electrohydraulic crusher is described and in
Engineering and Mining Journal of February 1970 pages 88 - 89 where a summary of the
U.S. Bureau of Mines report mentioned above is given.
[0005] Several patents have also been issued in this area which have recognized the importance
of electrical discharge in water to generate shock waves. For example, US-A-3,158,207
provides a spark discharge drill operating on this principle. US-A-3,364,708 gives
a good overall review of this phenomenon. Also, US-A-3,500,942; US-A-3,583,766 and
US-A-3,679,007 relate to drills in which an electric discharge takes place between
two electrodes immersed in a fluid such as water, thereby producing a high temperature,
high pressure plasma between the electrodes. The expansion of the plasma produces
a strong pressure or shock wave which enhances the drilling effect. The main disadvantages
of electrohydraulic fracturing are that the pressure pulse is spread out and a large
fraction of energy is dissipated in the water (see B.K. Parekh, et al., Supra).
[0006] Applicant has now surprisingly found that by delivering electrical energy at at least
100, preferably in excess of 200 megawatts per microsecond until a peak power of at
least 3, preferably in excess of 4 gigawatts is reached across the gap of two poles
of a coaxial electrode assembly immersed in an electrolyte within a confined area
of a substance to be blasted, one can produce a dielectric breakdown of the electrolyte
resulting in the formation of plasma within such confined area which creates a pressure
sufficient to blast such substance in the manner of a high explosive charge.
[0007] The electrolyte could be water or a solution suitable for dielectric breakdown. A
preferred solution is that of copper sulphate.
[0008] The electrolyte may also be combined with a gelling agent such as bentonite or gelatin
in order to make it viscous enough so that it would not run out of the confined area
prior to blasting.
[0009] The invention will now be disclosed, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying
drawings in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of the equipment required for the storage and release
of electrical energy for the plasma blasting process in accordance with the present
invention;
Figure 2 is a diagram illustrating the rate of energy and the peak power required
to break the rock; and
Figure 3 is a diagram of a continuous mining and tunneling machine for plasma blasting.
[0010] Referring to Figure 1, the plasma blasting method in accordance with the present
invention requires drilling of a hole 10 into the rock face by conventional drilling.
A small amount of viscous electrolyte 12, such as copper sulphate, is injected into
the hole and a coaxial blasting electrode 14 is inserted in the hole. Electrical energy,
typically 300-1000 kilojoules, is delivered into approximately 20-50 grams of the
electrolyte under confinement within the hole. Typical dimensions for the hole are
about 50 mm diameter and 500 mm depth. These dimensions may change depending on the
size of the blasting electrode and the amount of energy input. The diameter of the
hole should be such that the blasting electrode would have a close fit and the greater
the energy input the deeper the hole would be. The blasting electrode which fits closely
into the hole serves two purposes: (1) it carries electrical energy to the electrolyte,
(2) it produces the required confinement for the blast by plugging up the hole. Rapid
delivery of the electrical energy is important for the development of the desired
high peak pressure. Energy is delivered at at least 100 and preferably in excess of
200 megawatts per microsecond until a peak power of at least 3 gigawatts and preferably
in excess of 4 gigawatts is reached as illustrated in Figure 2 of the drawings. The
peak pressure developed has been found to be in excess of 1 gigapascal, or 10,000
atmospheres which is sufficient to blast hard rock in the manner of a high explosive
charge. Applicant has found that if the energy is delivered at less than 100 megawatts
per microsecond such as illustrated, for example, by the dotted line in Figure 2,
or the peak power is substantially less than 3 gigawatts, insufficient pressure is
created to adequately blast the rock, although the amount of energy delivered (area
under the curves) is essentially the same.
[0011] The electrical energy required for the blast is conveniently stored in a capacitor
bank 16 which is electrically charged by a suitable D.C. power supply 18. A high current
switch 20, such as the one described in US-A-4,897,577, is used to direct typically
500 kiloamperes to the blasting electrode at the time of blast. The switch is triggered
by a triggering device 22 which is initiated by a remote trigger 24 through a fiber
optic cable or a pneumatic tube to provide perfect electrical isolation for the operator.
The capacitor bank is connected to the blasting electrode through an electrical circuit
including a coaxial power cable 26 which is designed for minimum inductance and resistance
to reduce power losses and ensure rapid discharge of energy (at the above disclosed
rate) into the rock for the development of an intense shockwave.
[0012] Prior to the blast, the electrode is maintained at ground potential but when the
switch is triggered the center lead of the coaxial electrode is raised to the high
voltage of the capacitor bank. The electrolyte in the hole then suffers a dielectric
breakdown producing a plasma at extremely high temperature and pressure. In this manner,
a great amount of energy is transferred within a very short time from the capacitor
bank into the small amount of electrolyte in the confined area around the electrode
thereby instantaneously transforming this entire finite amount of electrolyte into
plasma which must then release this energy by way of a pressure wave, thus resulting
in a blast similar to that made by dynamite or other chemical explosives.
[0013] The plasma electrode may be equipped with a recoil mechanism to damp out the destructive
effect of the blast on the electrode.
[0014] Figure 3 is a diagram of a continuous mining and tunneling machine 30 at the back
of which is mounted the capacitor bank and associated equipment 32 for triggering
a blasting electrode mounted on one or several booms 34 located at the front of the
machine. A drilling and blasting head 36 is provided at the end of the boom. The rock
blasted from the mine face is collected at the front of the machine onto a conveyor
38 extending to the back of the machine for loading into conventional transport equipment.
1. A method of fragmenting a substance, which method comprises delivering electrical
energy across the gap of two poles of a coaxial electrode assembly (14) immersed in
an electrolyte (12) within a confined area (10) of the substance, so as to produce
a dielectric breakdown of the electrolyte (12) resulting in the formation of plasma
within said confined area (10), characterised in that the electrical energy is delivered
at at least 100 megawatts per microsecond until a peak power of at least 3 gigawatts
is reached, thereby creating a pressure sufficient to blast said substance in the
manner of a high explosive charge.
2. A method according to claim 1, in which the energy is delivered at in excess of 200
megawatts per microsecond.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the peak power is in excess of 4 gigawatts.
4. A method according to any preceding claim, in which the electrolyte (12) is a solution
of copper sulphate.
5. A method according to any preceding claim, in which the electrolyte (12) is combined
with a gelling agent to increase its viscosity.
6. A method according to claim 5, in which the gelling agent is bentonite.
1. Verfahren des Fragmentierens einer Substanz, wobei das Verfahren Liefern elektrischer
Energie durch den Spalt von zwei Polen einer koaxialen Elektroden-Anordnung (14) umfaßt,
welche in ein Elektrolyt (12) eingetaucht ist, innerhalb eines beschränkten Bereiches
(10) der Substanz, um somit einen dielektrischen Zusammenbruch des Elektrolytes (12)
zu erzeugen, resultierend in der Bildung von Plasma innerhalb des beschränkten Bereiches
(10), dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die elektrische Energie mit zumindest 100 Megawatt pro Mikrosekunde geliefert
wird, bis eine Spitzenleistung von zumindest 3 Gigawatt erreicht ist, wodurch ein
Druck erzeugt wird, welcher ausreicht zum Sprengen der Substanz in der Art einer hochexplosiven
Ladung.
2. Verfahren gemäß Anspruch 1, in welchem die Energie mit über 200 Megawatt pro Mikrosekunde
geliefert wird.
3. Verfahren gemäß Anspruch 1 oder 2, in welchem die Spitzenleistung über 4 Gigawatt
liegt.
4. Verfahren gemäß einem vorangegangenen Anspruch, in welchem das Elektrolyt (12) eine
Kupfer-Sulfat-Lösung ist.
5. Verfahren gemäß einem vorangegangenen Anspruch, in welchem das Elektrolyt (12) mit
einem Gelierungsmittel kombiniert ist zum Erhöhen seiner Viskosität.
6. Verfahren gemäß Anspruch 5, in welchem das Gelierungsmittel Bentonit ist.
1. Procédé de fragmentation d'une substance, lequel procédé comprend la délivrance d'une
énergie électrique à travers l'interstice séparant deux pôles d'un ensemble (14) formant
électrode coaxiale immergé dans un électrolyte (12) dans une région confinée (10)
de la substance, afin de produire une rupture diélectrique de l'électrolyte (12) résultant
en la formation de plasma dans ladite région confinée (10), caractérisé en ce que
l'énergie électrique est fournie à au moins 100 mégawatts par microseconde jusqu'à
ce qu'une puissance de crête d'au moins 3 gigawatts soit atteinte, créant ainsi une
pression suffisante pour abattre par explosion ladite substance à la manière d'une
charge hautement explosive.
2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel l'énergie est fournie à plus de 200
mégawatts par microseconde,
3. Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou la revendication 2, dans lequel la puissance de
crête dépasse 4 gigawatts.
4. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel l'électrolyte
(12) est une solution de sulfate de cuivre.
5. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel l'électrolyte
(12) est combiné à un agent de gélification pour accroître sa viscosité.
6. Procédé selon la revendication 5, dans lequel l'agent gélifiant est de la bentonite.