[0001] This invention is related to the recovery of minerals by froth flotation.
[0002] Flotation is a process of treating a mixture of finely divided mineral solids, e.g.,
a pulverulent ore, suspended in a liquid whereby a portion of the solids is separated
from other finely divided mineral solids, e.g., silica, siliceous gangue, clays and
other like materials present in the ore, by introducing a gas (or providing a gas
in situ) in the liquid to produce a frothy mass containing certain of the solids on the top
of the liquid, and leaving suspended (unfrothed) other solid components of the ore.
Flotation is based on the principle that introducing a gas into a liquid containing
solid particles of different materials suspended therein causes adherence of some
gas to certain suspended solids and not to others and makes the particles having the
gas thus adhered thereto lighter than the liquid. Accordingly, these particles rise
to the top of the liquid to form a froth.
[0003] The minerals and their associated gangue which are treated by froth flotation generally
do not possess sufficient hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity to allow adequate separation.
Therefore, various chemical reagents are often employed in froth flotation to create
or enhance the properties necessary to allow separation. Collectors are used to enhance
the hydrophobicity and thus the floatability of different mineral values. Collectors
must have the ability to (1) attach to the desired mineral species to the relative
exclusion of other species present; (2) maintain the attachment in the turbulence
or shear associated with froth flotation; and (3) render the desired mineral species
sufficiently hydrophobic to permit the required degree of separation.
[0004] A number of other chemical reagents are used in addition to collectors. Examples
of types of additional reagents used include frothers, depressants, pH regulators,
such as lime and soda, dispersants and various promoters and activators. Depressants
are used to increase or enhance the hydrophilicity of various mineral species and
thus depress their flotation. Frothers are reagents added to flotation systems to
promote the creation of a semi-stable froth. Unlike both depressants and collectors,
frothers need not attach or adsorb on mineral particles.
[0005] Froth flotation has been extensively practiced in the mining industry since at least
the early twentieth century. A wide variety of compounds are taught to be useful as
collectors, frothers and other reagents in froth flotation. For example, xanthates,
simple alkylamines, alkyl sulfates, alkyl sulfonates, carboxylic acids and fatty acids
are generally accepted as useful collectors. Reagents useful as frothers include lower
molecular weight alcohols such as methyl isobutyl carbinol and glycol ethers. The
specific additives used in a particular flotation operation are selected according
to the nature of the ore, the conditions under which the flotation will take place,
the mineral sought to be recovered and the other additives which are to be used in
combination therewith.
[0006] While a wide variety of chemical reagents are recognized by those skilled in the
art as having utility in froth flotation, it is also recognized that the effectiveness
of known reagents varies greatly depending on the particular ore or ores being subjected
to flotation as well as the flotation conditions. It is further recognized that selectivity
or the ability to selectively float the desired species to the exclusion of undesired
species is a particular problem.
[0007] Minerals and their associated ores are generally categorized as sulfides or oxides,
with the latter group including carbonates, hydroxides, sulfates and silicates. While
a large proportion of the minerals existing today are contained in oxide ores, the
bulk of successful froth flotation systems is directed to sulfide ores. The flotation
of oxide minerals is recognized as being substantially more difficult than the flotation
of sulfide minerals and the effectiveness of most flotation processes in the recovery
of oxide ores is limited.
[0008] A major problem associated with the recovery of minerals, both oxides and sulfides,
is selectivity. Some of the recognized collectors such as the carboxylic acids, alkyl
sulfates and alkyl sulfonates discussed above are taught to be effective collectors
for oxide mineral ores. Certainly, existing collectors are known to be useful in sulfide
flotation. However, while the use of these collectors can result in acceptable recoveries,
it is recognized that the selectivity to the desired mineral value may not be as high
as desired and, in the case of oxide flotation, is typically quite poor. That is,
the grade or the percentage of the desired mineral contained in the recovered mineral
is unacceptably low.
[0009] Thus, a need remains for methods of increasing selectivity in the flotation of both
sulfide and oxide ores.
[0010] The present invention is a process for the recovery of mineral values by froth flotation
comprising subjecting a particulate ore, which contains silica or siliceous gangue
and is in an aqueous slurry, to froth flotation under conditions such that the minerals
to be recovered are floated wherein the flotation of the silica or siliceous gangue
is depressed by the use of an effective amount of a hydroxy-containing compound selected
from the group comprising ethanol amine, propanol amine, butanol amine, lactic acid,
glycolic acid, ß-hydroxy-1-propane sulfonic acid, ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol,
propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, glycerol, trihydroxy benzoic acid, hydroxy benzoic
acid, butylene glycol, dibutylene glycol, diethanol amine, dipropanol amine, tripropanol
amine, triethanol amine and simple sugar alcohols such as sucrose, glucose and dextrose
and mixtures thereof. Additionally, the froth flotation process of this invention
utilizes collectors, frothers and other flotation reagents known in the art.
[0011] By improved selectivity, it is meant that the total amount of mineral recovered and/or
the grade of the mineral recovered is increased while the amount of silica or siliceous
gangue not recovered, i.e. remaining in the aqueous phase, is also increased. Thus,
by the process of this invention, the ability to separate silica and/or siliceous
gangue from desirable mineral values is enhanced. That is, the tendency of the silica
or siliceous gangue to float is depressed.
[0012] The flotation process of this invention is useful in the recovery of various minerals,
including oxide minerals, by froth flotation.
[0013] The flotation process of this invention is useful in the recovery of mineral values
from a variety of ores. An ore herein refers to the mineral as it is taken out of
the ground and includes the mineral-containing species intermixed with gangue. Gangue
are those materials which are of little or no value and need to be separated from
the mineral values. In this invention, gangue specifically includes silica and siliceous
materials.
[0014] As is well recognized by one skilled in the art, different types of collectors are
effective with different types of ores. Certain anionic collectors, described below
and useful in the present invention, have been found to be surprisingly effective
in the flotation of oxide ores. The oxide minerals which can be treated by the practice
of this invention include carbonates, sulfates and silicates as well as oxides. In
addition to its effectiveness in the flotation of oxide ores, it has also been found
that the anionic collectors in the flotation process of this invention are also effective
in the flotation of sulfide ores and mixed oxide/sulfide ores.
[0015] Non-limiting examples of oxide ores which can be floated using the practice of this
invention preferably include iron oxides, nickel oxides, phosphorus oxides, copper
oxides and titanium oxides. Other types of oxygen-containing minerals which can be
floated using the practice of this invention include carbonates such as calcite or
dolomite and hydroxides such as bauxite.
[0016] The process of this invention using the anionic collectors described below is also
useful in the flotation of various sulfide ores. Non-limiting examples of sulfide
ores which can be floated by the process of this invention include those containing
chalcopyrite, chalcocite, galena, pyrite, sphalerite and pentlandite.
[0017] Noble metals such as gold and silver and the platinum group metals wherein platinum
group metals comprise platinum, ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, osmium, and iridium,
can also be recovered by the practice of this invention. For example, such metals
are sometimes found associated with oxide and/or sulfide ores. For example, platinum
is sometimes found associated with troilite. By the practice of the present invention,
such metals can be recovered in good yield.
[0018] Non-limiting examples of oxide ores which can be subjected to froth flotation using
the process of this invention are those including cassiterite, hematite, cuprite,
vallerite, calcite, talc, kaolin, apatite, dolomite, bauxite, spinel, corundum, laterite,
azurite, rutile, magnetite, columbite, ilmenite, smithsonite, anglesite, scheelite,
chromite, cerussite, pyrolusite, malachite, chrysocolla, zincite, massicot, bixbyite,
anatase, brookite, tungstite, uraninite, gummite, brucite, manganite, psilomelane,
goethite, limonite, chrysoberyl, microlite, tantalite and samarskite. One skilled
in the art will recognize that the froth flotation process of this invention will
be useful for the processing of additional ores including oxide ores wherein oxide
is defined to include carbonates, hydroxides, sulfates and silicates as well as oxides
and sulfide ores.
[0019] Ores for which the process of this invention using anionic thiol collectors are useful
include sulfide mineral ores containing copper, zinc, molybdenum, cobalt, nickel,
lead, arsenic, silver, chromium, gold, platinum, uranium and mixtures thereof. Examples
of metal-containing sulfide minerals which can be concentrated by froth flotation
using the composition and process of this invention include copper-bearing minerals
such as covellite (CuS), chalcocite (Cu₂S), chalcopyrite (CuFeS₂), bornite (Cu₅FeS₄),
vallerite (Cu₂Fe₄S₇ or Cu₃Fe₄S₇), tetrahedrite (Cu₃SbS₂), enargite (Cu₃(As₂Sb)S₄),
tennantite (Cu₁₂As₄S₁₃), cubanite (Cu₂SFe₄S₅), brochantite (Cu₄(OH)₆SO₄), antlerite
(Cu₃SO₄(OH)₄), famatinite (Cu₃(SbAs)S₄), and bournonite (PbCuSbS₃); lead-bearing minerals
such as galena (PbS); antimony-bearing minerals such as stibnite (Sb₂S₃); zinc-bearing
minerals such as sphalerite (ZnS); silver-bearing minerals such as stephanite (Ag₅SbS₄)
and argentite (Ag₂S); chromium-bearing minerals such as daubreelite (FeSCrS₃); nickel-bearing
minerals such as pentlandite [(FeNi)₉S₈]; molybdenum-bearing minerals such as molybdenite
(MoS₂); and platinum- and palladium-bearing minerals such as cooperite [Pt(AsS)₂].
Preferred metal-containing sulfide minerals include molybdenite (MoS₂), chalcopyrite
(CuFeS₂), chalcocite (Cu₂S), galena (Pbs), sphalerite (ZnS), bornite (Cu₅FeS₄), and
pentlandite [(FeNi)₉S₈].
[0020] Sulfidized metal-containing oxide minerals are minerals which are treated with a
sulfidization chemical, so as to give such minerals sulfide mineral characteristics.
The minerals so treated can then be recovered in froth flotation using collectors
which recover sulfide minerals. Sulfidization results in oxide minerals having sulfide
mineral characteristics. Oxide minerals are sulfidized by contact with compounds which
react with the minerals to form a sulfur bond or affinity. Such methods are well known
in the art. Such compounds include sodium hydrosulfide, sulfuric acid and related
sulfur-containing salts such as sodium sulfide.
[0021] Sulfidized metal-containing oxide minerals and oxide minerals for which this process
utilizing the thiol collectors described below is useful include oxide minerals containing
copper, aluminum, iron, titanium, magnesium, chromium, tungsten, molybdenum, manganese,
tin, uranium, and mixtures thereof. Examples of metal-containing minerals which may
be sulfidized by froth flotation using the thiol collectors described below include
copper-bearing minerals such as malachite (Cu₂(OH)₂CO₃), azurite (Cu₃(OH)₂(CO₃)₂),
cuprite (Cu₂O), atacamite (Cu₂Cl(OH)₃), tenorite (CuO), chrysocolla (CuSiO₃); aluminum-bearing
minerals such as corundum; zinc-containing minerals such as zincite (ZnO) and smithsonite
(ZnCO₃); tungsten-bearing minerals such as wolframite [(Fe₂Mn)WO₄]; nickel-bearing
minerals such as bunsenite (NiO); molybdenum-bearing minerals such as wulfenite (PbMoO₄)
and powellite (CaMoO₄); iron-containing minerals such as hematite and magnetite; chromium-containing
minerals such as chromite (FeOCr₂O₃); iron- and titanium-containing minerals such
as ilmenite; magnesium- and aluminum-containing minerals such as spinel; titanium-containing
minerals such as rutile; manganese-containing minerals such as pyrolusite; tin-containing
ores; minerals such as cassiterite; and uranium-containing minerals such as uraninite,
pitchblende (U₂O₅(U₃O₈)) and gummite (UO₃nH₂O).
[0022] Other metal-containing minerals for which the use of thiol collectors in this process
is useful include gold-bearing minerals such as sylvanite (AuAgTe₂) and calaverite
(AuTe); platinum- and palladium-bearing minerals such as sperrylite (PtAs₂); and silver-bearing
minerals such as hessite (AgTe₂). Also included are metals which occur in a metallic
state, e.g., gold, silver and copper.
[0023] In a preferred embodiment of this invention, copper-containing sulfide minerals,
nickel-containing sulfide minerals, lead-containing sulfide minerals, zinc-containing
sulfide minerals or molybdenum₋ containing sulfide minerals are recovered. In an even
more preferred embodiment, a copper-containing sulfide mineral is recovered.
[0024] Ores do not always exist purely as oxide ores or as sulfide ores. Ores occurring
in nature may comprise both sulfur-containing and oxygen-containing minerals as well
as, in some cases, noble metals. Metals may be recovered from the oxides found in
such ores by the practice of this invention. This may be done in a two-stage flotation
where one stage comprises conventional sulfide flotation to recover primarily sulfide
minerals and the other stage of the flotation utilizes the process of the present
invention using the anionic collectors described below to recover primarily the oxide
minerals. Alternatively, the various types of minerals may be recovered simultaneously
by the practice of this invention.
[0025] In addition to the flotation of ores found in nature, the flotation process of this
invention is useful in the flotation of oxides and sulfides from other sources. For
example, the waste materials from various processes such as heavy media separation,
magnetic separation, metal working and petroleum processing often contain oxides and/or
sulfides that may be recovered using the flotation process of the present invention.
[0026] A wide variety of anionic collectors are useful in the practice of the present invention.
The anionic portion of the anionic collector is preferably derived from carboxylic,
sulfonic, sulfuric, phosphoric or phosphonic acids. The anionic collector is also
hydrophobic. Its hydrophobicity is derived from a saturated or unsaturated hydrocarbyl
or saturated or unsaturated substituted hydrocarbyl moiety. Examples of suitable hydrocarbyl
moieties include straight or branched alkyl, arylalkyl and alkylaryl groups. Non-limiting
examples of substituents for the hydrocarbyl group include alkoxy, ether, amino, hydroxy
and carboxy. When the hydrocarbyl moiety is unsaturated, it is preferably ethylenically
unsaturated. It should also be recognized that the anionic surfactant may be a mixture
of compounds.
[0027] The anionic collector may be used in acid form or in salt form, depending on which
is soluble under conditions of use. The appropriate form of the anionic collector
will vary depending on the particular collector used and other conditions present
in the flotation process. One skilled in the art will recognize that some of the anionic
collectors useful in the present invention will be soluble in the acid form under
conditions of use while others will be soluble in the salt form. For example, oleic
acid is preferably used in the acid form and saturated carboxylic acids are preferably
used in salt form. When the anionic collectors of the present invention are used in
salt form, the counter ion may be a calcium ion, a magnesium ion, a sodium ion, a
potassium ion or an ammonium ion. As discussed above, the choice of an appropriate
counter ion depends on the particular anionic collector used and its solubility. It
is generally preferred that the counter ion be a sodium ion, a potassium ion or an
ammonium ion.
[0028] Non-limiting examples of suitable anionic collectors include linolenic acid, oleic
acid, lauric acid, linoleic acid, octanoic acid, capric acid, myristic acid, palmitic
acid, stearic acid, arachidic acid, behenic acid, 2-naphthalene sulfonic acid, sodium
lauryl sulfate, sodium stearate, dodecane sodium sulfonic acid, hexadecyl sulfonic
acid, dodecyl sodium sulfate, dodecyl phosphate, chloride derivative of dodecyl phosphonic
acid, 2-naphthoic acid, pimelic acid, and dodecyl benzene sulfonate and mixtures thereof.
[0029] Preferred anionic collectors include those derived from carboxylic acids and sulfonic
acids. In the case of the anionic surfactants derived from carboxylic acids, the unsaturated
acids such as oleic acid, linoleic acid and linolenic acids or mixtures thereof are
preferred. Examples of mixtures of these carboxylic acids include tall oil and coconut
oil.
[0030] When the anionic collector is derived from sulfonic acids, it is preferred to use
alkyl or alkylaryl sulfonic acids. Examples of preferred species include dodecyl benzene
sulfonic acid, dodecyl sulfonic acid, alkylated diphenyl oxide monosulfonic acid and
salts thereof.
[0031] The thiol collectors of this invention are compounds selected from the group consisting
of thiocarbonates, thionocarbamates, thiocarbanilides, thiophosphates, thiophosphinates,
mercaptans, xanthogen formates, xanthic esters and mixtures thereof.
[0032] Preferred thiocarbonates are the alkyl thiocarbonates represented by the structural
formula:

wherein
R¹ is independently a C₁₋₂₀, preferably C₂₋₁₆, more preferably C₃₋₁₂ alkyl group;
Z¹ and Z² are independently a sulfur or oxygen atom; and
M⁺ is an alkali metal cation.
[0033] The compounds represented by this formula include the alkyl thiocarbonates (both
Z¹ and Z² are oxygen), alkyl dithiocarbonates (Z¹ is O, Z² is S) and the alkyl trithiocarbonates
(both Z¹ and Z² are sulfur).
[0034] Examples of preferred alkyl monothiocarbonates include sodium ethyl monothiocarbonate,
sodium isopropyl monothiocarbonate, sodium isobutyl monothiocarbonate, sodium amyl
monothiocarbonate, potassium ethyl monothiocarbonate, potassium isopropyl monothiocarbonate,
potassium isobutyl monothiocarbonate and potassium amyl monothiocarbonate. Preferred
alkyl dithiocarbonates include potassium ethyl dithiocarbonate, sodium ethyl dithiocarbonate,
potassium amyl dithiocarbonate, sodium amyl dithiocarbonate, potassium isopropyl dithiocarbonate,
sodium isopropyl dithiocarbonate, sodium sec-butyl dithiocarbonate, potassium sec-butyl
dithiocarbonate, sodium isobutyl dithiocarbonate, potassium isobutyl dithiocarbonate,
and the like. Examples of alkyl trithiocarbonates include sodium isobutyl trithiocarbonate
and potassium isobutyl trithiocarbonate. It is often preferred to employ a mixture
of an alkyl monothiocarbonate, alkyl dithiocarbonate and alkyl trithiocarbonate.
[0035] Preferred thionocarbamates correspond to the formula:

wherein
each R² is independently a C₁₋₁₀, preferably a C₁₋₄, more preferably a C₁₋₃, alkyl
group;
Y is -S⁻M⁺ or -OR³, wherein R³ is a C₁₋₁₀, preferably a C₂₋₆, more preferably a C₃₋₄,
alkyl group;
a is the integer 1 or 2; and
b is the integer 0 or 1, wherein a+b must equal 2.
[0036] Preferred thionocarbamates include dialkyl dithiocarbamates (a=2, b=0 and Y is S⁻M⁺)
and alkyl thionocarbamates (a=1, b=1 and Y is -OR³). Examples of preferred dialkyl
dithiocarbamates include methyl butyl dithiocarbamate, methyl isobutyl dithiocarbamate,
methyl sec-butyl dithiocarbamate, methyl propyl dithiocarbamate, methyl isopropyl
dithiocarbamate, ethyl butyl dithiocarbamate, ethyl isobutyl dithiocarbamate, ethyl
sec-butyl dithiocarbamate, ethyl propyl dithiocarbamate, and ethyl isopropyl dithiocarbamate.
Examples of preferred alkyl thionocarbamates include N-methyl butyl thionocarbamate,
N-methyl isobutyl thionocarbamate, N-methyl sec-butyl thionocarbamate, N-methyl propyl
thionocarbamate, N-methyl isopropyl thionocarbamate, N-ethyl butyl thionocarbamate,
N-ethyl isobutyl thionocarbamate, N-ethyl sec-butyl thionocarbamate, N-ethyl propyl
thionocarbamate, and N-ethyl isopropyl thionocarbamate. Of the foregoing, N-ethyl
isopropyl thionocarbamate and N-ethyl isobutyl thionocarbamate are most preferred.
[0037] Thiophosphates useful herein generally correspond to the formula:

wherein each R⁴ is independently hydrogen or a C₁₋₁₀ alkyl, preferably a C₂₋₈ alkyl,
or an aryl, preferably an aryl group having from 6-10 carbon atoms, more preferably
cresyl; Z is oxygen or sulfur; and M is an alkali metal cation.
[0038] Of the thiophosphates, those preferably employed include the monoalkyl dithiophosphates
(one R⁴ is hydrogen and the other R⁴ is a C₁₋₁₀ alkyl and Z is S), dialkyl dithiophosphates
(both R⁴ are C₁₋₁₀ alkyl and Z is S) and dialkyl monothiophosphate (both R⁴ are a
C₁₋₁₀ alkyl and Z is O).
[0039] Examples of preferred monoalkyl dithiophosphates include ethyl dithiophosphate, propyl
dithiophosphate, isopropyl dithiophosphate, butyl dithiophosphate, sec-butyl dithiophosphate,
and isobutyl dithiophosphate. Examples of dialkyl or aryl dithiophosphates include
sodium diethyl dithiophosphate, sodium di-sec-butyl dithiophosphate, sodium diisobutyl
dithiophosphate, and sodium diisoamyl dithiophosphate. Preferred monothiophosphates
include sodium diethyl monothiophosphate, sodium di-sec-butyl monothiophosphate, sodium
diisobutyl monothiophosphate, and sodium diisoamyl monothiophosphate.
[0040] Thiocarbanilides (dialkyl thioureas) are represented by the general structural formula:

wherein each R⁵ is individually H or a C₁₋₆, preferably a C₁₋₃, hydrocarbyl.
[0041] Thiophosphinates are represented by the general structural formula:

wherein M⁺ is as hereinbefore described and each R⁶ is independently an alkyl or aryl
group, preferably an alkyl group having from 1 to 12, more preferably an alkyl group
having from 1 to 8 carbon atoms. Most preferably, each R⁶ is isobutyl.
[0042] Mercaptan collectors are preferably alkyl mercaptans represented by the general structural
formula:
R⁷-S-H
wherein R⁷ is an alkyl group, preferably an alkyl group having at least 10, more preferably
from 10 to 16, carbon atoms.
[0043] Xanthogen formates are represented by the general structural formula:

wherein R⁸ is an alkyl group having from 1 to 7, preferably from 2 to 6 carbon atoms
and R⁹ is an alkyl group having 1 to 6, preferably 2 to 4, more preferably 2 or 3,
carbon atoms.
[0044] Xanthic esters are preferably compounds of the general structural formula:

wherein R¹⁰ is an allyl group and R¹¹ is an alkyl group having from 1 to 7 carbon
atoms.
[0045] Preferred thiol compounds for use as a collector are the thiocarbonates, thionocarbamates
and the thiophosphates due to the surprisingly high recoveries and selectivities towards
mineral values which can be achieved.
[0046] As will be recognized by one skilled in the art, the thiol collectors described above
are particularly useful in the flotation of sulfide minerals or sulfidized oxide minerals.
The other anionic collectors described above are useful in the flotation of certain
sulfide minerals, but are also surprisingly useful in the flotation of oxide minerals.
[0047] The hydroxy-containing compounds useful in the practice of this invention comprises
compounds containing at least one -OH moiety. This hydroxy compound is selected to
be essentially non-frothing under the conditions of use. For purposes of this invention,
non-frothing compounds are those which have minimal frothing action under the conditions
of use. As is well recognized by those skilled in the art, when considering simple
hydroxy-containing compounds such as alcohols, their frother power generally increases
with the number of carbon atoms in the alcohol up to about six or seven. When the
number of carbon atoms reaches this point, the effectiveness of the alcohol as a frother
drops. Thus, under some conditions of use, monohydric alcohols such as octanol, nonanol,
decanol, undecanol and dodecanol may be useful as non-frothing hydroxy-containing
compounds. Laboratory scale flotation work using relatively pure water has shown that
these alcohols may be non-frothing and useful in the practice of this invention. However,
under most practical conditions of use, these alcohols demonstrate sufficient frothing
so that their use is not preferred.
[0048] The hydroxy-containing compound used in the practice of this invention is ethanolamine,
propanolamine, butanolamine, lactic acid, glycolic acid, beta-hydroxy-l-propane sulfonic
acid, ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, glycerol, trihydroxybenzoic acid, hydroxybenzoic
acid, butylene glycol, ditbutylene glycol, diethanolamine, dipropanolamine, tripropanolamine,
triethanolamine or a simple sugar alcohol such as sucrose, glucose or dextrose, or
a mixture of two or more thereof.
[0049] In a more preferred embodiment, the hydroxy-containing compounds is ethanol amine,
propanol amine, butanol amine, diethanol amine, dipropanol amine, tripropanol amine,
triethanol amine or a mixture of two or more thereof.
[0050] The alkanol amines useful in the practice of this invention are available commercially.
As will be recognized by one skilled in the art, commercially available alkanol amines
will have varying degress of purity. For example, diethanol amine may contain varying
amounts of ethanol amine and/or triethanol amine. Such alkanol amines are suitable
in the practice of the present invention. The hydroxy-containing compounds may be
added directly to the float cell or may be added to the grinding stage. The preferred
time of addition will vary depending on the particular ore bing floated, the other
reagents present and the processing system being used. The hydroxy-containing compounds
are not pre-mixed with the collector prior to addition to the flotation process. They
are preferably added to the flotation system separately from the collector. They are
also preferably added prior to the addition of the collector. For example, the hydroxy-containing
compounds may be added to the grinding stage.
[0051] The collector can be used in any concentration which gives the desired recovery of
the desired metal values. In particular, the concentration used is dependent upon
the particular mineral to be recovered, the grade of the ore to be subjected to the
froth flotation process and the desired quality of the mineral to be recovered. Additional
factors to be considered in determining dosage levels include the amount of surface
area of the ore to be treated. As will be recognized by one skilled in the art, the
smaller the particle size, the greater the amount of collector reagents needed to
obtain adequate recoveries and grades.
[0052] Preferably, the concentration of the collector is at least about 0.001 kg/metric
ton, more preferably at least about 0.005 kg/metric ton. It is also preferred that
the total concentration of the collector is no greater than about 5.0 kg/metric ton
and more preferred that it is no greater than about 2.5 kg/metric ton. It is more
preferred that the concentration of the collector is at least about 0.005 kg/metric
ton and no greater than about 0.100 kg/metric ton. It is generally preferred to start
at the lower concentration range and gradually increase the concentration to obtain
optimum performance.
[0053] The concentration of the hydroxy-containing compounds useful in this invention is
preferably at least about 0.001 kg/metric ton and no greater than about 5.0 kg/metric
ton. A more preferred concentration is at least about 0.005 kg/metric ton and no more
than about 0.500 kg/metric ton. As discussed above, it is generally preferred to start
at the lower concentration range and gradually increase the concentration to obtain
optimum performance. This is particularly important when thiol collectors are used
in the flotation of sulfide minerals since the general trend is that selectivity is
increased at the expense of overall recovery.
[0054] It has been found advantageous in the recovery of certain minerals to add the collector
to the flotation system in stages. By stage addition, it is meant that a part of the
total collector dose is added; froth concentrate is collected; an additional portion
of the collector is added; and froth concentrate is again collected. This staged addition
can be repeated several times to obtain optimum recovery and grade. The number of
stages in which the collector is added is limited only by practical and economic constraints.
Preferably, no more than about six stages are used.
[0055] In addition to the hydroxy-containing compounds employed in the process of this invention,
other conventional additivies may be used in the flotation process, including other
collectors than those mentioned above. Examples of such additives include depressants
and dispersants. In addition to these additives, frothers may be and preferably are
also used. Frothers are well-known in the art and reference thereto is made for the
purposes of this invention. Non-limiting examples of useful frothers include C₅₋₈
alcohols, pine oils, cresols, C₁₋₆ alkyl ethers of polypropylene glycols, dihyroxylates
of polypropylene glycols, glycol fatty acids, soaps, alkylaryl sulfonates and mixtures
thereof.
[0056] When anionic collectors are used, pH is believed to play a role in the flotation
process. The nature of the anionic collectors of the present invention is related
to the charge characteristics of the particular oxide mineral to be recovered. Thus,
pH plays an important role in the froth flotation process of the present invention.
While not wishing to be bound by any particular theory, it is assumed that the anionic
collector attaches to the oxide at least in part through charge interaction with the
mineral surface. Thus, pH conditions under which the charge of the oxide mineral is
suitable for attachment are required in the practice of this invention.
[0057] The pH in flotation systems may be controlled by various methods known to one skilled
in the art. A common reagent used to control pH is lime. However, in the practice
of this invention, it is preferred to use reagents such as potassium hydroxide, sodium
hydroxide and sodium carbonate and other reagents having monovalent cations to regulate
pH. Reagents having divalent cations such as magnesium hydroxide and calcium hydroxide
may be used, but are not preferred since their use results in the need to use larger
dosages of the collector. It should be noted that when the anionic collector is derived
from sulfonic and sulfuric acids, the presence of divalent and/or metal cations is
not as detrimental.
[0058] The following examples are provided to illustrate the invention and should not be
interpreted as limiting it in any way. Unless stated otherwise, all parts and percentages
are by weight.
[0059] The following examples include work involving Hallimond tube flotation and flotation
done in laboratory scale flotation cells. It should be noted that Hallimond tube flotation
is a simple way to screen collectors, but does not necessarily predict the success
of collectors in actual flotation. Hallimond tube flotation does not involve the shear
or agitation present in actual flotation and does not measure the effect of frothers.
Thus, while a collector must be effective in a Hallimond tube flotation if it is to
be effective in actual flotation, a collector effective in Hallimond tube flotation
will not necessarily be effective in actual flotation. It should also be noted that
experience has shown that collector dosages required to obtain satisfactory recoveries
in a Hallimond tube are often substantially higher than those required in a flotation
cell test. Thus, the Hallimond tube work cannot precisely predict dosages that would
be required in an actual flotation cell.
Example 1 - Hallimond Tube Flotation of Malachite and Silica
[0060] In this example, the effect of various collectors on the flotation of copper was
determined using a Hallimond tube. About 1.1 g of (1) malachite, a copper oxide mineral
having the approximate formula Cu₂CO₃(OH)₂, or (2) silica was sized to about -60 to
+120 U.S. mesh and placed in a small bottle with about 20 ml of deionized water. The
mixture was shaken 30 seconds and then the water phase containing some suspended fine
solids or slimes was decanted. This desliming step was repeated several times.
[0061] A 150-ml portion of deionized water was placed in a 250-ml glass beaker. Next, 2.0
ml of a 0.10 molar solution of potassium nitrate was added as a buffer electrolyte.
The pH was adjusted to about 10.0 with the addition of 0.10 N HCl and/or 0.10 N NaOH.
Next, a 1.0-g portion of the deslimed mineral was added along with deionized water
to bring the total volume to about 180 ml. The collector and hydroxy-containing compound,
as identified in the various runs reported in Table I below, were added and allowed
to condition with stirring for 15 minutes. The pH was monitored and adjusted as necessary.
[0062] The slurry was transferred into a Hallimond tube designed to allow a hollow needle
to be fitted at the base of the 180-ml tube. After the addition of the slurry to the
Hallimond tube, a vacuum of 5 in (12.7 cm) of mercury was applied to the opening of
the tube for a period of 10 minutes. This vacuum allowed air bubbles to enter the
tube through the hollow needle inserted at the base of the tube. During flotation,
the slurry was agitated with a magnetic stirrer set at 200 revolutions per minute
(RPM).
[0063] The floated and unfloated material was filtered out of the slurry and oven dried
at 100°C. Each portion was weighed. After each test, all equipment was washed with
concentrated HCl and rinsed with 0.10 N NaOH and deionized water before the next run.
[0065] The data in the table above indicates the broad effectiveness of the present invention
in a Hallimond tube. It also indicates that the hydroxy-containing compound alone
generally functions poorly as a collector.
Example 2 -Hallimond Tube Flotation of Chrysocolla and Silica
[0066] The procedure outlined for Example 1 is followed with the exception that chrysocolla
(Cu₂H₂Si₂O₅(OH)₄) is used in place of malachite. In addition, in some cases different
collectors and hydroxy-containing compounds are used. The results obtained are set
out in Table II following.

[0067] The data in Table II above demonstrates the general effectiveness of the present
invention in the recovery of copper from chrysocolla in Hallimond tube flotation within
the limitations discussed relating to Example 1. These runs demonstrate that the use
of the hydroxy-containing compound and anionic surfactant results in increased copper
recovery, decreased silica recovery or both when compared to identical runs using
either component alone.
Example 3 - Flotation of Mixed Copper Oxide Ore
[0068] In this example, the effect of different collectors and hydroxy-containing compounds
on the flotation of copper ore in laboratory flotation cells was examined. Samples
of copper ore from Central Africa containing 500 g per sample were prepared. The ore
contained about 76 percent by weight malachite and the remainder was made up of chrysocolla
and chalcocite. A 500-g portion of the ore was ground with 257 g deionized water in
a rod mill at about 60 RPM for two minutes.
[0069] The resulting pulp was next deslimed. The pulp was placed in a flotation cell. The
cell was filled with water, the slurry pH adjusted to 9.2 with sodium carbonate and
then stirred for 5 minutes. The solids in the cell were allowed to settle for 120
seconds and then the water phase containing finely divided solids was decanted. This
process was repeated four times. This deslimed pulp was used in Run 8. In Runs 1-7,
the desliming steps were omitted.
[0070] The pulp was transferred to a 1500-ml Agitair Flotation cell outfitted with an automatic
paddle removal system. The pH of the slurry was adjusted to 9.2 by the addition of
sodium carbonate, if necessary. The collectors and hydroxy-containing compounds specified
in Table III were added separately to the slurry in the amounts specified in Table
III and the slurry was allowed to condition for one minute after the addition of each.
A polyglycol ether frother, in the amount of 40 g per ton of dry ore, was then added
and the slurry allowed to condition for one additional minute.
[0071] The flotation cell was agitated at 1150 RPM and air introduced at a rate of 4.5 liters
per minute. Samples of the froth concentrate were collected at 1.0 and 6.0-minute
intervals after the air was first introduced into the cell. Samples of the tailings
and concentrate were dried, weighed, and pulverized for analysis. After being pulverized,
they were dissolved with the use of acid and the copper content determined using a
DC Plasma spectrometer. The assay data was used to determine fractional recoveries
and grades using standard mass balance formulas.
[0072] The data obtained is shown in Table III following.

[0073] The data in Table III above demonstrates the effectiveness of this invention under
conditions approximating actual flotation conditions. Run 1, which is not an example
of the invention, approximates current industry practice. Runs 3, 5, and 7, which
are examples of the invention, demonstrate the effectiveness of the process of this
invention in the recovery of copper.
Example 4 - Flotation of Chrysocolla Ore
[0074] A series of samples containing 500 g of ore from Central Africa were prepared. The
ore contained greater than 90 percent chrysocolla and the remainder comprised additional
copper oxide minerals and gangue. A 500-g sample was ground with 257 g of deionized
water in a rod mill at about 60 RPM for six minutes. The resulting pulp was transferred
to an Agitair 1500 ml flotation cell outfitted with an automated paddle removal system.
The pH of the slurry was adjusted by the addition of either sodium carbonate or HCl.
The natural ore pH in slurry form was 7.8. After addition of the hydroxy-containing
compounds as shown in Table IV, the slurry was allowed to condition for one minute.
The collector was then added followed by an additional minute of conditioning. A polyglycol
ether frother was added in an amount of 20 g per ton of dry ore followed by an additional
minute of conditioning.
[0075] The float cell was agitated at 1150 RPM and air is introduced at a rate of 4.5 liters
per minute. Samples of the froth concentrate were collected at 1.0 and 6.0 minute
intervals after the air was first introduced. The samples of the concentrates and
the tailings were dried, weighed, pulverized for analysis and dissolved with the use
of acid. The copper content was determined by the use of DC Plasma Spectrometer. Using
the assay data, fractional recoveries and grades were calculated using standard mass
balance formulas. The results obtained are shown in Table IV following.

[0076] The data in Table IV generally demonstrates the effectiveness of the collector composition
of the present invention. Run 2 approximates current industry standards.
Example 5 - Flotation of Iron Oxide Ore
[0077] A series of 600-g samples of iron oxide ore from Michigan were prepared. The ore
contained a mixture of hematite, martite, goethite and magnetite mineral species.
Each 600-g sample was ground along with 400 g of deionized water in a rod mill at
about 60 RPM for 10 minutes. The resulting pulp was transferred to an Agitair 3000
ml flotation cell outfitted with an automated paddle removal system. The pH of the
slurry was adjusted from a natural pH of 7.3 to a pH of 8.5 using sodium carbonate.
The hydroxy-containing compound, if used, was added and the slurry allowed to condition
for one minute. This was followed by the addition of the collector, followed by an
additional minute of conditioning. Next, an amount of a polyglycol ether frother equivalent
to 40 g per ton of dry ore was added followed by another minute of conditioning.
[0078] The float cell was agitated at 900 RPM and air introduced at a rate of 9.0 liters
per minute. Samples of the froth concentrate were collected at 1.0 and 6.0 minutes
after the start of the air flow. Samples of the froth concentrate and the tailings
were dried, weighed and pulverized for analysis. They were then dissolved in acid,
and the iron content determined by the use of a D.C. Plasma Spectrometer. Using the
assay data, the fractional recoveries and grades were calculated using standard mass
balance formulas. The results are shown in Table V following.

[0079] The data in Table V above demonstrates the effectiveness of the present invention
in obtaining good recoveries of high grade iron.
Example 6 - Flotation of Arizona Copper Oxide Ore
[0080] A series of 30-g samples of -60 mesh copper ore from Arizona were prepared. It should
be noted that this ore is very fine and, thus, very difficult to float. The make-up
of the valuable components of the ore was about 60 percent azurite [Cu₃(CO₃)(OH)₂],
35 percent malachite [Cu₂CO₃(OH)₂], and 5 percent chalcocite [Cu₂S]. Each sample of
ore was ground with 15 g of deionized water in a rod mill (2.5 inch diameter with
0.5 inch rods)(6.35 cm dia. with 1.27 cm rods) for 240 revolutions. The resulting
pulp was transferred to a 300 ml flotation cell.
[0081] The pH of the slurry was left at natural ore pH of 8.0 unless otherwise noted. After
addition of the hydroxy-containing compound as shown in Table VI, the slurry was allowed
to condition for one minute. Next, the collector was added with an additional minute
of conditioning. Next, the frother, a polyglycol ether, was added in an amount equivalent
to 0.050 g per ton of dry ore and the slurry allowed to condition an additional minute.
[0083] The data in Table VI demonstrates the effectiveness of the collector composition
of the present invention in the flotation of difficult to float Arizona copper oxide
ore.
Example 7 - Flotation of Mixed Oxide/Sulfide Copper Ore
[0084] A series of 30-g samples of -10 mesh copper ore from Canada were prepared. The make-up
of the valuable portion of the ore was approximately 50 percent malachite [Cu₂CO₃(OH)₂]
and 50 percent chalcopyrite [CuFeS₂]. Each sample was ground along with 15 grams of
deionized water in a rod mill (2.5 inch diameter with 0.5 inch rods) for 1000 revolutions.
The resulting pulp was transferred to a 300 ml flotation cell. The pH of the slurry
was adjusted to 9.0 by the addition of sodium carbonate. The hydroxy-containing compound,
collector and frother were added as described in the previous examples.
[0085] The float cell was operated and samples were prepared and analyzed as described in
Example 6. The results obtained are given in Table VII following.

[0086] The data in Table VII above generally demonstrate the effectiveness of this invention
in the flotation of mixed copper oxide/sulfide ores.
Example 8 - Flotation of Corundum
[0087] A series of 30-g samples of a -10 mesh mixture of corundum (Al₂O₃) and silica (SiO₂)
were prepared. Each sample was ground and transferred to a 300 ml flotation cell as
described in Example 7 with the exception that the sample was ground 2000 revolutions.
The pH of the slurry was left at the natural pH of 7.4. Collector, hydroxy compound
and frother were added and the float cell operated as described in Example 7. Samples
were obtained as described in Example 7 and were dried, weighed, pulverized and the
aluminum content determined by X-ray fluorescence. The results obtained are shown
in Table VIII following.

[0088] The data shown in Table VIII above demonstrates the effectiveness of the present
invention in the separation of aluminum from silica by flotation.
Example 9 - Flotation of Various Oxide Ores
[0089] The general procedure described in Example 1 were followed with the exception that
various oxide ores were used in place of the copper ore of Example 1. The results
obtained are shown in Table IX following.

[0090] This example demonstrates the efficacy of the present invention in floating a broad
range of oxide and sulfide minerals. Also demonstrated is the ability to distinguish
these various minerals from silica, the major gangue constituent found with these
minerals in natural ores.
Example 10
[0092] It is apparent from Tables Xa and Xb that a number of hydroxy-containing compounds
are effective in decreasing the amount of silica gangue floated and generally resulting
in increased recovery and grade.
Example 11
[0093] A series of samples containing 30 g of a -10 mesh (U.S.) mixture of 10 percent rutile
(TiO₂) and 90 percent silica (SiO₂) were prepared. The remainder of the procedure
was exactly the same as that used in Example 6.

[0094] The data in Table XI above demonstrates the effect of the present invention in increasing
titanium grade and recovery.
Example 12 - Separation of Apatite and Silica
[0095] A series of 30-g samples of a -10 mesh (U.S.) mixture of 10 percent apatite (Ca₅(Cl₁F)[PO₄]₃)
and 90 percent silica (SiO₂) were prepared. The remainder of the procedure was exactly
the same as that used in Example 6. The natural ore slurry pH is 7.1.

[0096] The data presented above demonstrates that the use of hydroxy-containing compounds
of this invention with oleic acid (which is a recognized collector for the flotation
of apatite) gives better grade and faster flotation kinetics than the oleic acid alone.
The recoveries of apatite with all collectors was quite high although slight improvements
were observed in all cases using the hydroxy-containing compounds of this invention.
Likewise, grade was improved in each case with substantial improvement being shown
in Run 1.
Example 13 - Flotation of Chalcopyrite Copper Ore
[0097] In this example, the effect of different alkanol amines on the flotation of copper
ore in laboratory flotation cells was examined. Samples of copper ore from Western
Canada containing 500 g per sample were prepared. The ore was relatively high grade
and also contained significant amounts of silica gangue. A 500-g portion of the ore
was ground with 257 g deionized water in a rod mill having 2.5 cm rods at about 60
revolutions per minute (RPM) for about 7 minutes. This produced a size distribution
of 25 percent less than 100 mesh. Except as indicated in Table I, the alkanol amine
was added to the mill prior to the grinding step. Lime was also added to the mill
to produce the desired pH for the subsequent flotation.
[0098] The pulp was transferred to a 1500-ml Agitair Flotation cell outfitted with an automatic
paddle removal system. The cell was agitated at 1150 RPM. The, pH of the slurry adjusted
to 8.5 by the addition of additional lime, if necessary. The collector, potassium
amyl xanthate, unless specified otherwise in Table XIII, was added to the slurry at
a dosage of 8 g per ton and the slurry allowed to condition for one minute. A polyglycol
ether frother, in the amount of 18 g per ton of dry ore, was then added and the slurry
allowed to condition for one additional minute.
[0099] The flotation cell was agitated at 1150 RPM and air introduced at a rate of 4.5 liters
per minute. Samples of the froth concentrate were collected for a period of eight
minutes after the air was first introduced into the cell. These samples of the tailings
and concentrate were dried overnight in an oven, weighed, and pulverized for analysis.
After being pulverized, they were dissolved with the use of acid and the copper content
determined using a DC Plasma spectrometer. The assay data was used to determine fractional
recoveries and grades using standard mass balance formulas. The recoveries represent
the fractional amount of the specified mineral present that was recovered. Selectivity
was determined by dividing the copper recovery by the silica gangue recovery.
[0100] The data obtained is shown in Table XIII following.

[0101] The data in Table XIII demonstrates that the practice of this invention is effective
in decreasing the recovery of silica gangue and thus increasing the selectivity of
the flotation process. The data also demonstrates that the practice of this invention
can result in lower recovery of the desired copper mineral values. A comparison of
Runs 3, 17 and 20 shows that addition of the amine in the grinding stage rather than
in the flotation cell or concurrently with collector results in the highest recovery
of high grade copper.
Example 14 - Flotation of Mixed Copper Ore
[0102] A series of 30-g samples of mixed copper sulfide ore from Nevada were prepared. The
make-up of the valuable components of the ore was about 0.25 weight percent copper,
about 0.004 weight percent molybdenum and about 4 g/metric ton gold. Each sample of
ore was ground dry for about 20 seconds in a swing mill to about 12 percent greater
than 100 mesh. The resulting ore was transferred to a 300 ml flotation cell and diluted
with water.
[0103] The pH of the slurry was adjusted to 8.5 with lime. The alkanol amine as specified
in Table XIV was added and the slurry allowed to condition for one minute. Next, a
first portion of the collector, sodium isopropyl xanthate, (0.050 kg/metric ton of
ore) was added with an additional minute of conditioning. Next, the frother, a polyglycol
ether, was added in an amount equivalent to 0.020 g per ton of dry ore and the slurry
allowed to condition an additional minute.
[0104] The float cell was agitated at 1800 RPM and air introduced at a rate of 2.7 liters
per minute. Samples of the froth concentrate were collected by standard hand paddling
at 2.0 minutes after the start of the introduction of air into the cell. Next, a second
dose of collector (0.025 kg/metric ton of ore) was added with one minute of conditioning
and a six minute concentrate collected. Samples of the concentrate and the tailings
were combined and then dried and analyzed as described in the previous examples. The
results obtained are presented in Table XIV following. In each case, the copper, gold,
molybdenum and silica recoveries represent the total amount recovered at the 2 and
6 minute intervals.

[0105] The data shown above demonstrates the effectiveness of the process of the present
invention in increasing the grade of recovered mineral values.
Example 15 - Flotation of Mixed Sulfide/Oxide Copper Ore
[0106] The general procedure outlined in Example 13 was followed using a southern Africa
mixed sulfide/oxide copper ore. The sulfide copper ore was floated by the practice
of this invention and the remaining oxide ore recovered in a subsequent step such
as leaching or oxide flotation. The sulfide minerals contained in this ore was quite
small, less than about 0.22 weight percent of the total ore.
[0107] One modification to the procedure outlined in Example 13 was that the ore was ground
for 700 revolutions to produce a size distribution of 13 percent greater than 100
mesh. The collector used was potassium amyl xanthate at a concentration of 0.025 kg/metric
ton of ore. In each case, the alkanol amine used was diethanol amine in the amounts
specified. The results obtained are shown in Table XV following.

[0108] The data above again show that the practice of the present invention results in decreasing
recoveries of silica gangue. With this particular ore, the recovery of the desired
mineral values of lead and zinc also declined even at the lowest dosage of the alkanol
amine.
Example 16 - Effect of Order and Manner of Addition of Collector and Hydroxy-Containing Compound
[0109] The procedure outlined in Example 6 was followed with the exception that the apatite
used was from a different source and contained about 30 percent apatite and about
70 percent silica. The hydroxy-containing compound used in each case was diethanol
amine and the anionic collector oleic acid. In each run, the manner in which the diethanol
amine and oleic acid were added to the flotation system varied. In Run 1, diethanol
amine was added to the cell and allowed to condition for one minute. This was followed
by the addition of the oleic acid followed by an additional minute of conditioning.
In Run 2, the order of addition is reversed. In Run 3, diethanol amine and oleic acid
were each added to the cell at the same time and in approximately the same physical
location and allowed to condition for one minute. In Run 4, diethanol amine and oleic
acid were mixed in a separate container and a salt was formed as indicated by the
evolution of heat. This was added to the flotation cell and then conditioned for one
minute. In Run 5, a condensate of excess fatty acids and diethanol amine available
commercially as M-210 from The Dow Chemical Company was used in place of unreacted
oleic acid and diethanol amine. In Runs 6 and 7, oleic acid was used alone. The results
obtained are shown in Table XVI following.

[0110] Runs 1-3, embodiments of this invention clearly demonstrate its effectiveness. Run
4 shows that when the components of the invention are pre-mixed, the recovery of phosphorus
obtained is substantially less than when oleic acid is used alone. Run 5 shows that
a fatty acid/diethanol amine condensate is ineffective in this process.
1. A process for the recovery of mineral values by froth flotation comprising subjecting
a particulate ore, which contains silica or siliceous gangue and is in an aqueous
slurry, to froth flotation under conditions such that the minerals to be recovered
are floated wherein the flotation of the silica or siliceous gangue is depressed by
a hydroxy-containing compound, which is ethanolamine, propanolamine, butanolamine,
lactic acid, glycolic acid, beta-hydroxy-l-propane sulfonic acid, ethylene glycol,
diethylene glycol, propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, glycerol, trihydroxybenzonic
acid, hydroxybenzoic acid, butylene glycol, dibutylene glycol, diethanolamine, dipropanolamine,
tripropanolamine, triethanolamine, a simple sugar alcohol, such as sucrose, glucose
or dextrose, or a mixture of two or more such hydroxy-containing compounds.
2. The process of Claim 1, wherein the hydroxy containing compound is ethanolamine, propanolamine,
butanolamine, diethanolamine, dipropanolamine, dibutanolamine, triethanolamine, tripropanolamine,
tributanolamine or a mixture of two or more thereof.
3. The process of Claim 1, wherein the hydroxy-containing compound is an alkylene glycol
or a mixture of two or more thereof.
4. The process of Claim 3, wherein the alkylene glycol is ethylene glycol, diethylene
glycol, propylene glycol or a mixture of two or more thereof.
5. The process of any one of the preceding claims, including an anionic collector derived
from a carboxylic, sulfonic, sulfuric, phosphoric or a phosphonic acid.
6. The process of Claim 5, wherein the anionic collector comprises an alkyl sulfonic
acid, or salt thereof, an alkylaryl sulfonic acid or salt thereof, or a mixture of
two or more thereof.
7. The process of Claim 5, wherein the anionic collector is an alkylated benzene sulfonic
acid or salt thereof, an alkylated sulfonic acid or salt thereof, an alkylated diphenyl
oxide monosulfonic acid or a salt thereof, or a mixture of two or more thereof.
8. The process of Claim 5, wherein the anionic collector is linolenic acid, oleic acid,
lauric acid, linoleic acid, octanoic acid, capric acid, myristic acid, palmitic acid,
stearic acid, arachidic acid, behenic acid, 2-naphthalenic sulfonic acid, dodecane
sodium sulfonic acid, chloride derivative of dodecyl phosphonic acid, 2-naphthoic
acid, pimelic acid, 11-aminododecanoic acid, dodecyl benzyl sulfonic acid, hexadecyl
sulfonic acid a salt of any of the aforesaid acids, sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium
stearate, dodecyl sodium sulfate, dodecyl phosphate, or a mixture of two or more thereof.
9. The process of any one of the preceding claims, including a thiol collector which
is a thiocarbonate, a thionocarbamate, a thiocarbanilide, a thiophosphate, a thiophosphinate,
a mercaptan, a xanthogen, a formate, a xanthic ester, or a mixture of two or more
thereof.