Additive for paper and its use

Description

[0001] This invention pertains to the field of paper pulp making and their chemistry.

[0002] Of the many raw materials used by the paper industry, cellulose fibers have occupied the dominant position for nearly 2000 years. The techniques of paper making are known worldwide and the basic principles have not changed. Despite great improvements in papermaking, however, procedures for strengthening cellulose fibers in the papermaking process are often expensive, time consuming, and environmentally questionable.

[0003] The kraft or sulfate process is probably the most extensively employed method to produce strong cellulose fibers. The active ingredients in pulping wood to its fibrous state are sodium hydroxide and sodium sulfide, in a strong alkaline solution. The process generates objectionable smells from the sodium sulfide produced during the process. Kraft pulps are dark in color, difficult to bleach and very strong.

[0004] Nevertheless, cellulose fibers obtained from the pulping process are generally unsuited for paper making and must first be refined. With given pulps, final paper properties are largely controlled by the type and extent of refining action employed. A variety of additive materials can be introduced to the paper-making pulps, commonly called "furnish", during stock preparation. Fillers such as clays, or calcium carbonate are used for the control of sheet opacity and for other reasons. Dyes are used extensively for color control and other additives such as wet-strength agents, and defoamers are used as needed.

[0005] For the most part, however, operations designed to increase the strength and/or other physical properties of paper take place subsequent to the paper making operation and are called "off-machine converting". These converting operations are highly complex and include embossing, coating, waxing, laminating, impregnating, saturating, corrugating, and printing. For example, food packaging has led to extensive paper utilization with the paper often being coated, waxed, resin-impregnated, or combined with other foils and films. A relatively simple and inexpensive method of improving the paper making process and increasing the stiffness and ultimate strength of paper is needed.

[0006] In our specification EP-A-0382576 published August 16th, 1990 and with claimed priority dates of February 10th and June 23rd, 1989 we have described water-soluble degradation products of cellulose derivatives e.g. carboxymethyl cellulose, having an average degree of polymerization 3 to 300. The degradation may be effected enzymatically. These products are stated to be useful as thickeners, binders, stabilizers, suspending agents, or flow control agents in a wide variety of applications including paper and to be useful as organic resistant coatings in e.g. paper.

[0007] EP-A-0301372 describes the use of enzymatically degraded starch having a viscosity of 20 to 2000 mPa.s (as a 7.5% aqueous solution at 45°C) with a cationic polymer of specified type in paper making to improve dry strength. DE-A-2636951 describes the use of amylases to break down starch and starch derivatives to be used in paper making.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0008] The present invention provides a method of stengthening paper which comprises incorporating into said paper during or after its manufacture a mixture of water-soluble or water dispersible oligomers derived by enzymatic degradation of a cellulose derivative, a majority of said oligomers having a degree of polymerization and molecular weight such that the oligomer conforms to a rod-like configuration and an average degree of polymerization in the range of about 5 to about 100.

[0009] The invention also provides a method of enhancing the dewatering properties of paper pulp by treating the pulp with a mixture of water-soluble or water-dispersible oligomers as aforesaid.

[0010] The water soluble or water dispersable oligomers used in the invention have an average degree of polymerization in the range of about 5 to about 100, preferably 5 to 50. The cellulose derivative is degraded by enzymatic mechanisms, typically using a polysaccharide degrading enzyme.

[0011] By conventional means, a polymer or an initially degraded polysaccharide derivative mixture may be further separated into fractions of polymers of differing average chain lengths, e.g. using chromatographic techniques. The viscosity of the various fractions will vary with the degree of average chain length of the polymers contained within a fraction. Depending on the particular paper product application, one or more fractions are selected from an initial polymeric mixture having a viscosity (average chain length) which is most appropriate for the particular application.

[0012] The method of strengthening paper of the invention comprises treating the paper with a water soluble or water dispersable mixture of relatively low molecular weight polymers obtained by enzymatically degrading a cellulose derivative.

[0013] The method of enhancing the dewatering properties of paper pulp of the invention comprises treating the pulp with a water soluble or water dispersable mixture of relatively low molecular weight polymers obtained by enzymatically degrading a cellulose derivative.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0014] Figure 1 is a force-distance curve of Whatman No. 1 filter paper treated with carboxymethyl cellulose hydrolyzate.

[0015] Figure 2 is a force-distance curve of Whatman No. 1 filter paper dipped in distilled water.

[0016] Figure 3 is a force-distance curve of untreated Whatman No. 1 filter paper.

[0017] Figure 4 shows results of drainage tests on furnish treated with carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) hydrolyzate (·), carboxymethyl cellulose (○), carboxymethyl starch (CM starch) hydrolyzate (□), carboxymethyl starch (CM starch) (△), and untreated furnish (□).

[0018] Figure 5 shows results of drainage tests on furnish/calcium carbonate mixtures treated with carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) hydrolyzate (·), carboxymethyl cellulose (○), carboxymethyl starch (CM starch) hydrolyzate (□), and carboxymethyl starch (CM starch) (□).

[0019] The results shown in the figures obtained with carboxymethyl starch derivatives are not within the present invention but are included for comparison.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0020] This invention describes paper materials treated with the degradation product of a cellulose derivative and methods therefor.

[0021] Cellulose is made up of glucose monomers and is the major structural component of plants.

[0022] The term "derivative" is meant to define cellulose that is substituted. Preferably, the cellulose starting material has a degree of derivatization or substitution of between about 0.1 and about 3.0. "Degree of substitution" refers to the number of derivative groups (e.g. carboxymethyl, hydroxypropyl) per monomer unit in the cellulose backbone. A degree of substitution of 0.2 means, for example that there is about one derivative substitutent for every five monomer units in the cellulose backbone. A degree of substitution of three would mean there are three derivative substituents per every monomer unit in a cellulose chain. Typical substituents comprise one or more of sulfate, carboxylic acid, carboxylic ester, pyruvic acid, carboxymethyl, hydroxpropyl, methyl, methylethyl, hydroxyethyl, hydroxethylmethyl and the like.

[0023] Cellulose derivatives are commercially available. Such exemplary products as methylcellulose (MC, Methocel MC, 64630, Fluka Chemie AG, CH-9470 Buchs, Switzerland), hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC, H-9262, Sigma Chem. Co., St Louis, MO) and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC 7MFD, Blanose, Hercules Chem. Co., 92507 Rueil-Malmaison Ceder, France) all have a degree of substitution between 0.1 and 3. Hydroxpropyl celluloses are also commercially available and suitable for use.

[0024] As described more fully herein, such cellulose derivatives may be degraded to polymeric mixtures of average degree of polymerization (DP) between about 5 and about 100 by enzymatic means. The polymeric mixtures are generally referred to as a "hydrolyzate". The term "degraded" refers to the procedure whereby cellulose derivatives are broken down into smaller polymeric units.

[0025] Exemplary enzymes for use in degrading certain of the above described cellulose derivatives are various cellulases. They can be produced from a multitude of different microorganisums such as strains of Trichoderma, Aspergillus, Penicillium, etc. A selected microorganism strain is grown by conventional means in a suitable medium such that the cellulases are produced, the microorganism is separated from the medium, the medium is collected and typically concentrated and dried. Cellulase preparations suitable for use herein are, e.g. the commercially available cellulase preparations designated as the Econase series as produced by Alko Ltd. Helsinki, Finland.

[0026] The polymers described above are used in the method of the invention to improve the properties of paper products and to strengthen paper products. In its broadest embodiment, the method comprises preparing a polymeric mixture of substituted cellulose having an average degree of polymerization (DP) in the range of 5-100. Next, the mixture is then contacted with paper for a period of time sufficient to treat the paper with the polymer mixture.

[0027] This invention relates more specifically to a paper or paper product treated with water soluble or dispersable mixture of polymers derived from a cellulose derivative. The polymeric mixtures are characterized by having an average degree of polymerization (DP) in the range of about 5 to 100.

[0028] The terms "paper" and "pulp products" are intended to include a variety of products made from cellulose, synthetic or other fibers, such products being recognised by those skilled in the art as paper, boards, construction paper. In addition, these terms refer to articles prepared from cellulose, synthetic, or other fibers or filamentous materials such as those used in the textile industry. Specific examples include felted or matted sheets of cellulose fibers, formed on a fine wire screen from a dilute water suspension, and bonded together as the water is removed and the sheet is dried. These terms may also include sheet materials produced from other types of fibers, particularly mineral or synthetic fibers, formed and bonded by other means. These terms also include liquified or semi-solid mixtures of pulped fibers, commonly called "furnish", to which is added various materials such as fillers (clays, calcium carbonate), dyes, wet-strength agents and the like during the typical paper-making process.

[0029] Methods of paper manufacture include the basic steps of pulping fibers, refining the pulp by addition of various materials, as described below, forming the paper on mesh screens, and drying the matted fibers.

[0030] The polymer mixtures can be applied after the paper is made, in the so-called "off-machine converting" procedures. The mixtures can be applied using methods well known in the art such as dipping, spraying, and rolling.

[0031] Not wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that the cellulose derivative mixture thus prepared coats the surface of the paper and becomes fixed thereon by attraction between the cellulose derivative mixture and the polysaccharide components of the paper including by physical forces such as hydrogen bonding, Van der Waals forces and the like. The low molecular weight polymers of the invention are aligned along the cellulose, or other fibers. As a result, the intermolecular attraction per unit length increases, facilitating the quality of the final product and improving the processability of the paper or pulp product.

[0032] The polymeric mixtures can also be incorporated into the paper furnish during pulp defining procedures. In this embodiment, the mixture of degraded cellulose derivatives can be incorporated into the pulp furnish along with other dyes, colorants, wet-strength agents (agents capable of increasing the strength of wet or suspended materials), defoamers, and the like. In this procedure, the cellulose derivatives will become impregnated into the matrix of the paper fibers.

[0033] The term "treated" or "treatment" are intended to include means or methods for contacting paper products with the polymeric mixtures so that at least one effect of such contact is to strengthen the paper, coat or impregnate the paper, improve the paper or pulp handling properties during manufacture, and/or increase the dewatering capacity of the paper pulp. Examples of methods of treatment include the two methods of introducing the cellulose derivatives of the invention to the paper or paper products described above.

[0034] Paper produced according to the method of this invention may be stronger than non-treated paper. Moreover, treated paper may less water spreading than untreated paper. Furnish treated with the polymers of the invention show an increased rate of dewatering during the early stages of draining.

[0035] This invention will now be more particularly described using the following examples. In Examples 4 and 5 comparative data are included for carboxymethyl starch and its hydrolyzate.

Example 1: Preparation of a Cellulose Precursor Hydrolyzate

[0036] Cellulose derivative hydrolyzates may be prepared from soluble cellulose derivatives as discussed above by an enzymatic hydrolysis utilizing a cellulase preparation having endo-1, 4-beta-glucanase as the sole active hydrolytic agent. The average degree of polymerization (DP) of the polymers formed by such a hydrolysis is less than about 100, and thus the viscosity of solutions of the hydrolyzate is reduced significantly compared to the viscosity of solutions of the unhydrolysed cellulose derivatives. The specific conditions suitable for and the specific time sufficient to secure the desired hydrolysis may be readily determined for each selected cellulose derivative and each selected enzyme preparation.

Example 2: Preparation of Specific Cellulose Derivative Enzyme Hydrolyzates

a. Methylcellulose hydrolyzate

[0037] 30 g of methylcellulose (MC, Methocel MC, 64630, Fluka Chemie AG, CH-9470 Buchs, Switzerland) was mixed in 3 l of water and the pH of the solution was adjusted to 5.5 with 15% phosphoric acid and the temperature was raised to 40°C. 0.3 ml of the enzyme preparation having a total endo-1, 4 beta-glucanase activity of 1680 nkat from which the beta-glucosidase activity was removed chromatographically (as described above) was added to the solution. After hydrolysis for 24 hours the enzyme was inactivated by heating (90°C, 15 min.). The hydrolyzate solution was subsequently cooled and freeze-dried.

[0038] The hydrolyzate product contained less than 0.5% by weight of glucose and cellobiose.

b. Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose hydrolyzate

[0039] 20 g of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC, H-9262, Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.) was mixed in 1 l of water and the pH of the solution was adjusted to 5.5 with 15% phosphoric acid and the temperature was raised to 40° C. 0.24 ml of the enzyme preparation having a total endo-1, 4 beta-glucanase activity of 1340 nkat from which the beta-glucosidase activity was removed chromatographically (as described above) was added to the solution. After two hours another 20g of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose was added to the solution. After the hydrolysis of 22 hours the enzyme was inactivated by heating (90°C, 15 min.). Finally the hydrolyzate solution was cooled and freeze-dried.

[0040] The product contained less than 0.05% by weight of glucose and cellobiose.

c. Carboxymethylcellulose hydrolyzate

(i) Hydrolysis with Trichoderma reesei derived enzyme preparation

[0041] 20 kg of carboxymethylcellulose (CMC 7MFD-type, a cellulose gum, also designated by the tradename Blanose and available from Hercules Chemical Company, 92507, Rueil-Malmaison Cede, France; 7MFD designates a medium viscosity, food grade carboxymethylcellulose having 7 out of 10 glucose units substituted with carboxymethyl) was mixed in 320 l of water and the pH of the solution was adjusted to 5.5 with 15% phosphoric acid and the temperature was raised to 40°C. About 0.27 l of the enzyme preparation having a total endo-1, 4 beta-glucanase activity of 1,780,000 nkat from which the beta-glucosidase activity was removed chromatographically (as described above) was added to the CMC solution. After one hour another 23 kg of CMC was added to the solution. After hydrolysis of 23 hours the enzyme was inactivated by heating (90°C, 15 min.). Finally, the hydrolysis solution was concentrated by conventional evaporating and spray-drying.

[0042] The product contained less than 2% by weight of glucose and cellobiose. When the same hydrolysis was carried out with the original cellulase enzyme preparation of Trichoderma reesei-fungus, the amount of produced glucose and cellobiose was above 5% by weight.

(ii) Hydrolysis with Aspergillus and Penicillium derived enzyme preparations

[0043] The enzyme preparations selected were commercially available Cellulase AP 3 (Amano Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nagoya, Japan) produced using an Aspergillus strain and Cellulase CP (Sturge Enzymes, North Yorkshire, England) produced using a Penicillium strain. Carboxymethylcellulose hydrolyzates were prepared as described in Example c(i), except that 30g of CMC-7MFD was used in 1 l of water, and the amounts of enzymes added were 0.028 g of Cellulase AP 3 (having a total endo-1, 4 beta-glucanase activity of 1350 nkat) and 0.048 g of Cellulase CP (having a total endo-1, 4 beta-glucanase activity of 1350 nkat). The viscosities and molecular weight distributions of the hydrolyzates produced by either cellulase were similar to the hydrolyzate produced with enzymes derived from Trichoderma reesei.

[0044] The viscosities of the various cellulose derivatives and their hydrolyzates as described above were measured using a Haake-Rotovisco viscometer with sensor systems NV (Karlsruhe, Federal Republic of Germany) (Table 1). The viscosities were measured in water solutions at 25°C. Table 1 sets forth the concentrations (by weight) of a variety of solutions all having the same viscosity.

[0045] As the data in Table 1 indicate, the hydrolyzate of n cellulose derivative has a substantially lower viscosity than an equal amount by weight in aqueous solution of the cellulose derivative itself.

[0046] CMC hydrolyzates used in present invention have the average degree of polymerization in the range of 5 to 100, based on the viscosity average molecular weight. The viscosity average molecular weights of the CMC hydrolyzates were calculated using the Mark-Houwink equation:


where [η] is intrinsic viscosity, Mv is the viscosity average molecular weight of the polymer and K and a are hydrodynamic constants caracteristic of the particular polymer-solvent system. The values of K and a for CMC, which were used in this study, were K = 0.043 in 0.2 M NaCl and a = 0.76 in 0.2 M NaCl as described in Brown and Henley, Studies on Cellulose Derivatives Part IV. The Configuration of the Polyelectrolyte in Sodium Chloride Solutions, Macromol. Chem., Vol. 79, 68-88 (1964). It is noted that a variety of methods for determining average molecular weights exist, and therefore the values of average molecular weights determined, as well as the average DP values calculated from them, depend upon the experimental method and the basis for calculation. CMC hydrolysates described in this invention have an intrinsic viscosity of between 50 ml. per gram to 3 ml. per gram, then determined in 0.2M sodium chloride. The CMC hydrolysates have the viscosity value in the range of from 5 to 100 mPa.s, when measured in 20% (by weight) solution at 25°C with shear rate 584⁻¹ using a Haake Viscotester,
VI 500 with sensor system NV (Karlsruhe, Federal Republic of Germany).

[0047] The Mark-Houwink exponent, a, is indicative of the conformation of the polymer chain in solution. The conformation of the polymer chain in solution may be classified as an 1) impermeable dense sphere, 2) random coil, e.g. semi-permeable or free draining, and 3) rodlet or rod-like. Mark-Houwink exponents of 0.002 to about 0.5 correspond to dense spheres, exponents of about 0.5 to about 0.8 correspond to semi-permeable random coils, exponents of 0.8 to about 1.2 correspond to free draining random coils and exponents of about 1.2 to about 2 correspond to rodlets or rod-like oligomers or polymers.

[0048] In an embodiment of this invention, the degradation product of the polysaccharide derivative comprises a mixture of oligomers of the polysaccharide having a Mark-Houwink exponent of at least 1.5 at an NaCl concentration of about 0.005N to about 0.5N. This NaCL concentration range is typically used when measuring Mark-Houwink exponents. The salt content of foodstuffs may also typically fall into this range.

[0049] CMC raw material (Mw>15,000 Daltons) has Mark-Houwink exponents of 0.83-0.97, indicating a free draining random coil conformation. In the random coil conformation, polymer coils are confined by the intra-chain interactions; therefore less change is seen in the Mark-Houwink exponent within the same range of ionic strength. However, when the weight average molecular weight is less than 15,000 Daltons, the CMC chain is not sufficiently long to form a winding coil, the polymer chain is no longer subjected to the constraint of intra-chain interactions, and a chain of free strip or rod-like configuration may form. When the ionic strength is low, the electrostatic repulsion force becomes dominant due to the negative charge of the carboxymethyl groups, and the polymer assumes its most stiff rod-like conformation with the highest value of the Mark-Houwink exponents. When the ionic strength increases, the negative charge of carboxymethyl groups is shielded, the repulsion forces between the neighbouring groups are reduced, and the polymer chains relax, yielding a lower Mark-Houwink exponent.

[0050] The experimentally determined data show that the molecular weight and chain conformational characteristics of the most preferred cellulose derivative oligomeric mixtures used in the invention, i.e. mixtures comprising a significant or substantial portion of oligomers of rod-like conformation, are distinctly different from those of undegraded cellulose derivatives. As shown by the experimentally determined Mark-Houwink a values listed in Table 2 below for weight average molecular weights, M_w, of CMC at less than about 15,000 daltons (a=1.58 to 2.07), the literature value of a=0.74 for CMC is erroneous with respect to CMC having a M_w of less than about 15,000 daltons. These experimentally determined data quantitatively indicate that relatively short chain CMC assumes a rod-like configuration as opposed to a free draining random coil conformation of the undegraded polymer.

TABLE 2

Mark-Houwink Equations for CMC (25°C)
NaCl Concentration (N)	Weight Average Molecular Weight
	>15,000	<15,000
0.005	[η]=0.0069MW0.97	[η]=0.02x10⁻⁵MW2.07
0.010	[η]=0.0084MW0.94	[η]=0.17x10⁻⁵MW1.82
0.050	[η]=0.0090MW0.91	[η]=0.83x10⁻⁵MW1.63
0.100	[η]=0.0116MW0.88	[η]=1.18x10⁻⁵MW1.59
0.200	[η]=0.0182MW0.83	[η]=2.00x10⁻⁵MW1.55
0.500	[η]=0.0179MW0.83	[η]=1.21x10⁻⁵MW1.58

[0051] Furthermore, the most preferred oligomeric mixtures according to the invention have a relatively narrow range of molecular weights, i.e. relatively monodispersed, having a polydispersity index (M_w/M_n, weight average molecular weight divided by number average molecular weight) of less than about 2.0 and typically less than about 1.8. The weight average molecular weights and number average molecular weights of a variety of CMC hydrolysate samples of different degree of hydrolysis were measured and the polydispersity index of all such hydrolysates was calculated as ranging between about 1.1 and about 1.9. Therefore, the oligomers in a most preferred mixture of oligomers extend over a relatively narrow range of M_w and, even as to mixtures having an average molecular weight at or near the upper limit of M_W where the oligomers may begin to assume a random coil configuration, are comprised of a significant portion, preferably a majority, of oligomers having a rod-like configuration.

[0052] In the experimental determination of M_w values, CMC solutions were prepared in 0.2N NaCl solution at pH of 7. The solutions were passed through an HPLC column, and the light intensity was detected by multiangle laser light scattering using a Wyatt Technology, multiangle laser light scattering instrument, model DAWN-F. The flow rate was 0.2 ml/min. The concentrations of the solutions were detected by refractometer, and the sensitivity of the refractometer was 64. The weight average molecular weights, M_w, were determined using appropriate computer software.

Example 3: Treatment of Paper with Polymers derived from Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)

[0053] Ten percent of carboxylic cellulose hydrolyzate (intrinsic viscosity = 31.4 ml per gram) dispersion was prepared with deionized water by stirring overnight. The process was carried out by dipping Whatman No. 1 filter paper in the hydrolyzate dispersion in water for 5 minutes. After dipping, the papers were dried in an oven overnight. Three paper samples (hydrolyzate treated, water treated, and untreated papers) were tested for tensile strength, strain limit, modulus, and water and oil spreading. For the tensile test, paper was cut to 50 x 2 mm and loaded in the grip of an Instron Universal Testing Machine (Model 1122, Canton MA 02021).

Results

[0054] After dipping into hydrolyzate solution, the treated paper was dried and tested. (Table 3).

[0055] Force-elongation tests were performed with a cross-head speed of 5 mm min⁻¹, a chart speed of 500 mm min⁻¹, and a maximum load of 2000g_f. FIGS. 1, 2, 3 for hydrolyzate-treated water-treated, and untreated papers, respectively. The resultant values of the maximum tensile strength before rupturing of treated paper showed a 2 to 3 fold increase over untreated or water treated papers when the paper was treated with the hydrolyzate. Also, the strain limit and modulus increased by dipping paper in hydrolyzate (Table 3). Dipping paper in water alone decreased the mechanical strength and increased the strain limit (Table 3).

[0056] Water and oil spreading on the papers were also tested (Table 4). Paper dipped in the water did not show any difference in water spreading compared to untreated paper. However, it showed more spreading of oil compared to untreated paper. Hydrolyzate-dipped paper showed much less water spreading than untreated paper.

Example 4: Hydrolyzed Polysaccharide Derivatives as Dewatering Aids

[0057] Polysaccharide derivatives or their hydrolyzates were prepared and dissolved in water. After stirring for 10 minutes, the solution was added to furnish. The final mixture contained furnish (0.106% w/v solid) and 0.0053% (w/v) polysaccharide derivatives or their hydrolyzates. The mixture was mixed for 10 minutes and poured on basement paper which serves as a screen. The amount of water drained was recorded for the determination of dewatering rate and final water content was measured. The furnish was dried in the oven and used in the tensile strength test.

[0058] Drainage tests for furnish treated with charged polysaccharides and with their hydrolyzates showed initial drainage rates higher than that of furnish alone. (FIG. 4).

[0059] The amount of drained water (i.e. an index of dewatering) and the water content of the furnish (i.e. an index of draining) treated with charged polysaccharide derivatives and their hydrolyzates are shown in Table 5.

Table 5

Furnish Treatment	Amount of Water Drained (ml)	Weight of Retained Water (g) (Final Water Content)
CMC Hydrolyzate	95	5.3
CMC	92	4.5
CM Starch Hydrolyzate	94	6.2
CM Starch	94	5.4
Control (Furnish)	93	5.0

[0060] Tensile strength tests showed that the furnish treated with charged polysaccharide hydrolyzates gave higher tensile strength and tangential modulus than those tested with high molecular weight charged polysaccharides (Table 6).

Table 6

Sample Furnish Treatment	Maximum Tensile Strength (atm)	Strain Limit (%)	Modulus (atm %)
CMC Hydrolyzate	114.0	4.7	60
CMC	75.8	5.5	33
CM Starch Hydrolyzate	100.0	4.7	58
CM Starch	85.7	4.3	46
Control (Furnish)	88.4	4.7	51

[0061] Therefore, this experiment shows that cellulose derivatives and their hydrolyzate increase the rate of dewatering in the early stage of drainage. Particularly, the cellulose derivative hydrolyzates of the invention significantly improve the mechanical properties of the pulp product.

Example 5:

[0062] Polysaccharides or their hydrolyzates were prepared and dissolved in a warm water (80°C, CM starch and its hydrolyzate) or room temperature water (CMC and its hydrolyzate). After stirring for 10 minutes, the solution was mixed with Ca(CO₃)₂ solution. After stirring for 10 minutes, the mixture was added to furnish. The mixture contained furnish with 0.106% (w/v) solid, 0.106% (w/v) Ca(CO₃)₂, and 0.00575% (w/v) polysaccharides or their hydrolyzates. The test for dewatering was repeated. The draining rates were faster in those mixtures containing hydrolyzate than those of high molecular weight polysaccharides (Figure 5).

[0063] The amount of drained water, and the final water content of the samples treated with charged polysaccharides and their hydrolyzates are shown in Table 7. Furnish and Ca(CO₃)₂ treated with hydrolyzates showed a higher dewatering rate, retaining less water than furnish and Ca(CO₃)₂ treated with higher molecular weight polysaccharide derivatives.

Table 7

Furnish Mixture Treatment	Amount of Water Drained (ml)	Weight of Retained Water (g) (Final Water Content)
CMC Hydrolyzate	98	4.3
CMC	90	5.5
CM Starch Hydrolyzate	94	6.4
CM Starch	89	7.4

[0064] The furnish mixture thus produced were dried in an oven and the tensile strength was tested. The test results showed that the samples treated with charged polysaccharide hydrolyzates had a higher tensile strength and tangential modulus than those treated with high molecular weight charged polysaccharide for both CMC and CM starch (Table 8).

Table 8

Sample Paper	Maximum Tensile Strength (atm)	Strain Limit (%)	Tangential Modulus (atm/%)
CMC Hydrolyzate	81.2	4.5	43
CMC	61.4	4.4	35
CM Starch Hydrolyzate	101.7	5.0	61
CMS	85.7	5.6	49
Control (Furnish)	88.4	4.7	51

Claims

1. A method of strengthening paper which comprises incorporating into said paper during or after its manufacture a mixture of water-soluble or water dispersible oligomers derived by enzymatic degradation of a cellulose derivative, a majority of said oligomers having a degree of polymerization and molecular weight such that the oligomer conforms to a rod-like configuration and an average degree of polymerization in the range of about 5 to about 100.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the mixture of oligomers has an average degree of polymerization in the range of about 5 to 50.

3. A method according to claim 1 wherein the mixture of oligomers has an average molecular weight of less than about 15000 daltons.

4. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein the mixture of oligomers has a molecular weight distribution such that its polydispersity index is less than 2 and the mixture contains less than 25% by weight of mono- and di-saccharides.

5. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein the cellulose derivative is substituted by carboxymethyl, methyl, hydroxypropyl, methylethyl, hydroxyethyl, hydroxymethylethyl, hydroxypropylmethyl, sulfate, carboxylic acid, carboxylic acid ester, or pyruvate.

6. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein one or more dyes, colorants, wet-strength agents and defoamers are also incorporated into the paper.

7. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the mixture of oligomers is incorporated by coating the paper by dipping, spraying or rolling, or by including the mixture in the furnish.

8. A method of enhancing the dewatering properties of paper pulp which comprises treating the pulp with a mixture of water-soluble or water dispersible oligomers derived by enzymatic degradation of a cellulose derivative, a majority of said oligomers having a degree of polymerisation and molecular weight such that the oligomer conforms to a rod-like configuration, and an average degree of polymerisation in the range of about 5 to about 100.

9. A method according to claim 8, wherein the mixture of oligomers has an average degree of polymerisation in the range of about 5 to 50.

10. A method according to claim 8 wherein the mixture of oligomers has an average molecular weight of less than about 15000 daltons.

11. A method according to any one of claims 8 to 10 wherein the mixture of oligomers has a molecular weight distribution such that it polydispersity index is less than 2 and the mixture contains less than 25% by weight of mono-and di-saccharides.

12. A method according to any one of claims 8 to 11, wherein the said pulp comprises cellulose fibres, or synthetic or mineral fibres.

13. A method according to any one of claims 8 to 12, wherein the cellulose derivative is substituted by carboxymethyl, methyl, hydroxypropyl, methylethyl, hydroxyethyl, hydroxymethylethyl, hydroxpropylmethyl, sulfate, carboxylic acid, carboxylic acid ester, or pyruvate.

Ansprüche

1. Verfahren des Verstärkens von Papier mit:
Einbringen in das Papier während oder nach seiner Herstellung einer Mischung von wasserlöslichen oder wasserdispergierbaren Oligomeren, die durch enzymatischen Abbau eines Cellulosederivates erhalten werden,
wobei eine Mehrheit der Oligomere einen Polymerisationsgrad und ein Molekulargewicht derart aufweisen, daß das Oligomer einer stäbchenartigen Konfiguration und einem mittleren Polymerisationsgrad in dem Bereich von ungefähr 5 bis ungefähr 100 entspricht.

2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei dem die Mischung von Oligomeren einen mittleren Polymerisationsgrad in dem Bereich von ungefähr 5 bis 50 aufweist.

3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei dem die Mischung von Oligomeren ein mittleres Molekulargewicht von weniger als ungefähr 15000 Dalton aufweist.

4. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 3, bei dem die Mischung von Oligomeren eine Molekulargewichtsverteilung derart aufweist, daß sein Polydispersieindex geringer als 2 ist und die Mischung weniger als 25 Gewichtsprozent von Mono- und Disacchariden enthält.

5. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 4, bei dem das Cellulosederivat durch Carboxymethyl, Methyl, Hydroxypropyl, Methylethyl, Hydroxyethyl, Hydroxymethylethyl, Hydroxypropylmethyl, Sulfat, Carbonsäure, Carbonsäureester oder Pyruvat substituiert ist.

6. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 5, bei dem ein oder mehr Farbstoff, Färbemittel, Naßverstärkungsmittel und Entschäumer ebenfalls in das Papier eingebracht werden.

7. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 6, bei dem die Mischung von Oligomeren durch Beschichten des Papieres durch Eintauchen, Sprühen oder Rollen oder durch Einschließen der Mischung in den Eintrag eingebracht wird.

8. Verfahren des Vergrößerns der Entwässerungseigenschaften von Papierzellstoff, mit Behandeln des Zellstoffes mit einer Mischung aus wasserlöslichen oder wasserdispergierbaren Oligomeren, die durch enzymatischen Abbau eines Cellulosederivates erhalten werden, wobei eine Mehrheit der Oligomere einen Polymerisationsgrad und ein Molekulargewicht derart aufweisen, daß die Oligomere einer stäbchenartigen Konfiguration und einem mittleren Polymerisationsgrad in dem Bereich von ungefähr 5 bis ungefähr 100 entspricht.

9. Verfahren nach Anspruch 8, bei dem die Mischung von Oligomeren einen mittleren Polymerisationsgrad in dem Bereich von ungefähr 5 bis 50 aufweist.

10. Verfahren nach Anspruch 8, bei dem die Mischung von Oligomeren ein mittleres Molekulargewicht von weniger als ungefähr 15000 Dalton aufweist.

11. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 8 bis 10, bei dem die Mischung von Oligomeren eine Molekulargewichtsverteilung derart aufweist, daß ihr Polydispersieindex weniger als 2 ist und die Mischung weniger als 25 Gewichtsprozent Mono- und Disaccharide enthält.

12. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 8 bis 11, bei dem der Zellstoff Cellulosefasern oder synthetische oder mineralische Fasern enthält.

13. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 8 bis 12, bei dem das Cellulosederivat durch Carboxymethyl, Methyl, Hydroxypropyl, Methylethyl, Hydroxyethyl, Hydroxymethylethyl, Hydroxypropylmethyl, Sulfat, Carbonsäure, Carbonsäureester oder Pyruvat substituiert ist.

Revendications

1. Procédé de renforcement de papier, comprenant les étapes consistant à incorporer dans ledit papier, pendant ou après sa fabrication, un mélange d'oligomères solubles ou dispersibles dans l'eau, provenant de la dégradation enzymatique d'un dérivé cellulosique, une majorité desdits oligomères ayant un degré de polymérisation et une masse moléculaire tels que l'oligomère présente une configuration en bâtonnets et un degré de polymérisation moyen compris dans la gamme allant d'environ 5 à environ 100.

2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le mélange d'oligomères présente un degré de polymérisation moyen compris dans la gamme allant d'environ 5 à environ 50.

3. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel le mélange d'oligomères présente une masse moléculaire moyenne inférieure à environ 15 000 daltons.

4. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 3, dans lequel le mélange d'oligomères présente une distribution de la masse moléculaire telle que son indice de polydispersité soit inférieur à 2, et le mélange contient moins de 25 % en poids de monosaccharides et de disaccharides.

5. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 4, dans lequel le dérivé cellulosique porte un substituant carboxyméthyle, méthyle, hydroxypropyle, méthyléthyle, hydroxyéthyle, hydroxyméthyléthyle, hydroxypropylméthyle, sulfate, acide carboxylique, ester d'acide carboxylique ou pyruvate.

6. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 5, dans lequel un ou plusieurs teintures, colorants, agents de résistance à l'état humide et agents antimoussage sont également incorporés dans le papier.

7. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 6, dans lequel le mélange d'oligomères est incorporé par couchage du papier au moyen d'immersion, pulvérisation ou application au rouleau, ou par inclusion du mélange dans la composition.

8. Procédé pour renforcer les propriétés d' assèchement de la pâte à papier, comprenant les étapes consistant à traiter la pâte avec un mélange d'oligomères solubles ou dispersibles dans l'eau, provenant de la dégradation enzymatique d'un dérivé cellulosique, une majorité desdits oligomères ayant un degré de polymérisation et une masse moléculaire tels que l'oligomère présente une configuration en bâtonnets et un degré de polymérisation moyen compris dans la gamme allant d'environ 5 à environ 100.

9. Procédé selon la revendication 8, dans lequel le mélange d'oligomères présente un degré de polymérisation moyen compris dans la gamme allant d'environ 5 à environ 50.

10. Procédé selon la revendication 8, dans lequel le mélange d'oligomères présente une masse moléculaire moyenne inférieure à environ 15 000 daltons.

11. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 8 à 10, dans lequel le mélange d'oligomères présente une distribution de la masse moléculaire telle que son indice de polydispersité soit inférieur à 2, et le mélange contient moins de 25 % en poids de monosaccharides et de disaccharides.

12. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 8 à 11, dans lequel ladite pâte comprend des fibres cellulosiques ou des fibres synthétiques ou minérales.

13. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 8 à 12, dans lequel le dérivé cellulosique porte un substituant carboxyméthyle, méthyle, hydroxypropyle, méthyléthyle, hydroxyéthyle, hydroxyméthyléthyle, hydroxypropylméthyle, sulfate, acide carboxylique, ester d'acide carboxylique ou pyruvate.

Drawing