[0001] The present invention relates to railway vehicles.
[0002] According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a set of railway
vehicles comprising a first major length vehicle coupled to a minor length vehicle
having a radiussed end which is in spaced nested relationship with a substantially
correspondingly radiussed end of the first vehicle.
[0003] Preferably, a vehicle set in accordance with the first aspect of the invention comprises
a plurality of the first major length vehicles between each adjacent pair of which
is a minor length vehicle (the intermediate vehicle) coupled to the first vehicles
and having radiussed ends which are in spaced nested relationship with substantially
correspondingly radiussed ends of the first vehicles.
[0004] Therefore, the preferred vehicle set comprises a minimum of three vehicles, namely
two of the "first" major length vehicles and an intermediate minor length vehicle.
More preferably however the set will comprise two major length end vehicles, n centre
vehicles (where n is one or more), and (n + 1) intermediate vehicles.
[0005] Preferably (a) the intermediate vehicles have their own wheel sets (e.g. bogies or
two axle wheel sets), (b) there are no wheel sets on the centre wagons (which are
supported between the intermediate wagons), and (c) the end wagons only have wheels
at the ends of the vehicle set. This arrangement has the advantage that, when the
vehicle set travels around a curve, the angle between the centre lines of two of the
adjacent major length vehicles is less than would be the case if the intermediate
vehicles were not present. The preferred form of vehicle set in accordance with the
first aspect of the invention is a single or double decker construction (in which
the decks run from one end of the set to the other) for carrying motor vehicles. The
"reduced" articulation between the first major length vehicles allows cars to be positioned
across the gaps between adjacent vehicles of the set without fear that the articulation
of the railway vehicles will interfere with the car bodywork and result in damage
thereto. It is thus possible to maximise the loading of the vehicle set by positioning
cars across the gaps.
[0006] Preferably, the coupling between adjacent vehicles of the vehicle set is a solid
coupling, i.e. one which does not have any substantial resilience in the longitudinal
direction.
[0007] Preferably, the or each intermediate length vehicle has a roof structure which engages
with the roofs of the adjacent first major length vehicle wagons, wherein the roof
structure of the intermediate wagon is mounted to have a degree of play to permit
movement of the two first wagons relative to each other.
[0008] According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided an intermediate
vehicle having a wheel set and at least one (and preferably two) radiussed end(s).
[0009] A third aspect of the invention provides a major length vehicle with at least one
radiussed end.
[0010] According to a fourth aspect of the invention there is provided a set of railway
vehicles in which a gap between adjacent vehicles is covered (at least at the sides
of the vehicles) by a first gap closure member on one vehicle locating at least partially
behind a second gap closure member of the other vehicle, said gap closure members
being capable of movement relative to each other.
[0011] The arrangement of first and second gap closure members is, of course, preferably
provided at each side of the vehicle set.
[0012] One or both gap closure members at each side of the set may be pivotally mounted
on its respective vehicle so as to be openable laterally outwardly of the vehicle
to gain access, for example, to side entrance openings provided in one or both vehicles.
[0013] According to a fifth aspect of the invention there is provided a vehicle set comprising
a pair of adjacent railway vehicles coupled together wherein provided at each side
of the vehicle above the level of the coupling are restraining means for resisting
relative roll of the two vehicles. Preferably the restraining means comprise, at each
side of the set, a resilient member on one of the vehicles in engagement with a reaction
member (e.g. a friction plate) on the other vehicle. The resilient means and reaction
member may, for example, be mounted on upper solebars of the adjacent vehicles.
[0014] According to a sixth aspect of the present invention there is provided a railway
vehicle having at one end means which may be lowered to engage the ground and/or rails
and raise that end of the vehicle. Such an arrangement is particularly useful in cases
where the load carrying bed of the vehicle is at a lower level than an existing loading
installation (e.g. for the case where the railway vehicle has comparatively small
wheels) so that by raising the end of the load carrying bed of the railway vehicle
to the height of the existing installation loading can be facilitated.
[0015] According to a seventh aspect of the present invention there is provided a railway
vehicle having at least one set of buffers which are vertically moveable between upper
and lower positions.
[0016] All aspects of the invention described above are particularly useful in conjunction
withrailway vehicles having comparatively small wheels, e.g. less than 700mm, although
their use in conjunction with larger diameter wheels is of course not precluded.
[0017] The invention will be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying
drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 illustrates a set of railway vehicles in accordance with the first aspect of
the invention, also showing the set in plan view going round a curve;
Fig. 2 is a schematic plan view illustrating the coupling of the vehicle shown in
Fig. 1;
Fig. 3 is a schematic side view showing the coupling of the vehicles in Fig. 1;
Fig. 4 is a plan view of an Intermediate Platform Wagon and an adjacent end of a centre
wagon;
Fig. 5 is a schematic illustration of a portion of the vehicle set of Fig. 1 traversing
an undulation;
Fig. 6 is an enlarged view of the left-hand end of the vehicle set shown in the top
part of Fig. 1;
Fig. 7 is a schematic cross-section on the line A-A of Fig. 6;
Fig. 8 illustrates a detail of a roof of an Intermediate Platform Wagon;
Fig. 9 illustrates two end wagons coupled together in their loading position; and
Figs. 10(a) and 10(b) schematically illustrate roll control means between adjacent
vehicles of the set shown in Fig. 1.
[0018] Fig. 1 illustrates a set 1 of railway vehicles in accordance with the first aspect
of the invention which form a "double-deck" car transporter. The illustrated set 1
comprises a total of nine individual vehicles made up of two end wagons 2, four Intermediate
Platform Wagons 3 (IPW), and three centre wagons 4 arranged as shown in Fig. 1. Each
of the vehicles 2-4 is of "double-decker" construction and such that a car loaded
at one end of the set 1 onto either the upper or lower deck may travel on that deck
along the set from one end to the other.
[0019] Each of the end wagons 2 has an end bogie 5 and the IPWs 3 each have one bogie 6.
No wheels are provided on the centre wagons 4, nor at the 'inner' ends of the end
wagons 2. The bogies 5 and 6 may have small diameter wheels (e.g. less than 700mm)
so as to maximise the load carrying height of the vehicle set. The bogie units 5 and
6 are pivoted about the points 8 (see lower portion of Fig. 1). As an alternative
to the bogies 5 and 6, it is possible to use twin-axle sets formed otherwise than
as a bogie unit.
[0020] As indicated above, the centre wagons 4 do not have their own wheel sets. These wagons
4, which each locate between two IPWs 3, are coupled to and carried by the two adjacent
IPWs 3. The connection between a centre wagon 4 and an IPW 3 is by means of a solid
coupler 9 (Fig. 2) which is rigidly attached to the wagon 4 and which pivots about
point 10 on the IPW 3. Similarly, the connection between an end wagon 2 and an adjacent
IPW 3 is by means of a solid coupler pivoted at 10 on the IPW. Thus, each IPW has
two points 10 about which a solid coupler connection (to an adjacent wagon 2 or 4)
pivots.
[0021] By "solid coupler" is meant one that does not have any substantial resilience in
the longitudinal direction of the set 1. A schematic illustration of such a coupler
is shown in Fig. 3 which illustrates a distance g along the length of the coupling
between the end of the wagon 4 and the end of the adjacent wagon 3. This distance
g is a constant, irrespective of the relative position of the two wagons 3 and 4.
It should however be noted that it is only the distance g along the length of the
coupling which is a constant since adjacent wagons 3 and 4 can articulate relative
to each other, both for the purpose of going round curves (horizontal articulation)
as well as over uneven or undulating tracks (vertical articulation). This relative
movement of the wagons will be referred to in more detail below.
[0022] Each end of the IPW 3 is radiussed, the arc preferably being centred on the adjacent
pivot point 10. Each end of the IPW is closely nested to a correspondingly radiussed
end of the adjacent centre wagon 4 (or end wagon 2 - as the case may be), as shown
in more detail in Fig. 4. There is however a small distance between the nested ends
of the IPWs 3 and adjacent wagons 2 (or 4), as provided by the length of the solid
coupler 9. The use of the solid coupler 9 does however allow this gap to be minimised,
as compared to the use of a resilient coupler (i.e. one which incorporates rubber
blocks permitting relative change in the distance between two adjacent wagons along
the length of the coupler).
[0023] It will have been noted from Fig. 1 that the IPW is of comparatively small length
compared to the length of an end wagon 2 or centre wagon 4. Generally, the length
of the IPW will be sufficient to take at least three-quarters or one car.
[0024] The advantage of using the small length IPWs is illustrated in the lower portion
of Fig. 1 illustrating the set 1 travelling around a curve. The centreline of a wagon
4 passes through the associated pivot 10 about which the wagon 4 is coupled to the
IPW 3. Thus the centre lines of two adjacent wagons 4 make an angle Φ relative to
each other. This angle Φ is exactly half the angle which would exist between the two
wagons 4 if they were directly connected to each other (the assumption being that
the wagons have bogies on same centre line and that the end of one wagon 4 is convex
so as to nest within the corresponding concave end of the other wagon 4). Thus, for
the set illustrated in Fig. 1, the relative articulation between two wagons 4 (or
between a wagon 2 and an adjacent wagon 4) is reduced by half by virtue of the provision
of the IPW.
[0025] The use of the rigid coupler 9 in conjunction with the IPW 3 has the advantage that
the gap which must be maintained between a wagon 4 (or wagon 2) and an IPW 3 to permit
vertical articulation between the two vehicles may be minimised. This may be appreciated
from the somewhat exaggerated schematic view of Fig. 5 which illustrates part of the
set traversing a "dished" section of track. Only a comparatively small degree of vertical
articulation between a wagon 4 and IPW 3 is required to permit the set to pass along
the track, as compared to the case where the wagons 4 (modified with bogies as appropriate)
are connected directly to each other. A similar argument applies in the case of the
set travelling over a "hump" in which case the top of the adjacent vehicles 3 and
4 would move relatively away from each other. Whilst travelling through the "dish"
(see Fig. 5) or over a hump, the fixed distance g along the length of the coupling
between adjacent vehicles is maintained. This obviously reduces the permitted degree
of vertical articulation.
[0026] Thus, by providing the IPWs 3 and the rigid coupling 9, it is possible to position
the wagons 2, 3, and 4 relatively close to each other. This minimising of the gap
allows cars to be loaded across the gap (on either the upper or lower deck) and since
there is only comparatively small articulation between an IPW 3 and a wagon 4 (or
wagon 2) as the set 1 moves around a curve, it is possible for a car to be loaded
across the gap without fear of the wall of one or other of the vehicles interfering
with the car bodywork during relative articulation.
[0027] The provision of only a relatively small gap between the vehicles has aesthetic advantages
with regard to the overall appearance of the set, but has further advantages in relation
to security. In particular, the relatively small gap may easily be covered thereby
preventing unauthorised access through the gap into what may otherwise be a completely
"closed" unit in that the set has a roof, ends with loading and unloading doors which
may be closed (see below), and any side windows provided with transparent material.
The set may thus be as secure as possible against the intrusion of thieves, vandals,
or terrorists. Nevertheless, access to the inside of the set may be required from
time to time by, for example, customs officers. Therefore, to provide for closure
of the gap but to permit access as aforesaid, the arrangement shown in Figs. 6 and
7 is provided, the latter figure being a somewhat schematic cross-section on the line
A-A of Fig. 6. The arrangement shown in Fig. 6 is for an IPW 3 between an end wagon
2 and a centre wagon 4, but the arrangement would be exactly the same in the case
of an IPW 3 between two centre wagons 4.
[0028] The end wagon 2 has a lower opening 11 whereas the IPW 3 has an upper opening 12
at the top of a ladder 13, the openings 11 and 12 and the ladder 13 being covered
in the manner illustrated in more detail in Fig. 7. As shown in this figure, a vertically-extending
steel shutter 14 is pivotally mounted on the IPW 3 so as to be spaced laterally outwardly
of the ladder 13 and to cover this ladder 13 as well as the opening 12. Pivotally
mounted on the end wagon 2 is a vertically-extending rubber door 15, the free vertical
edge of which locates between shutter 14 and the ladder structure 13. This free vertical
edge is provided with a replaceable wear strip 16.
[0029] Shutter 14 may be locked closed but nevertheless opened by authorised personnel,
in which case it pivots in the direction of arrow X, thereby exposing ladder 13 and
permitting access to the set through opening 12. Once the shutter 14 has been opened,
the rubber door 15 may also be opened in the direction of arrow Y so as to provide
for access through opening 11 to the lower deck of the set. Whilst the train is travelling,
the rubber door 15 is able to move relatively within the gap between shutter 14 and
ladder 13. Such relative movement will, in effect be a sliding movement of door 15
relative to shutter 14, and this obviates disadvantages which would be associated
with the use of "concertina type" covers in the gap between adjacent vehicles since
such covers will eventually become subject to fatigue resulting from continual flexing.
The only maintenance which is required for the illustrated coupling is occasional
replacement of the wear strip 16.
[0030] It will be appreciated that the IPW will carry a total of four shutters 14, i.e.
two at each end (on opposite sides thereof) of the IPW. Two ladders may also be provided
at each side of the IPW, although only one has been illustrated in Fig. 6.
[0031] Although access to the upper deck of the set has been indicated as being through
opening 12, this opening may be of restricted headroom. Therefore, the IPW is provided
with a "lifting roof" 17 which at each end overlaps, and is in engagement with, the
ends of the roofs of adjacent wagons 2 or 4. In view of the fact that, during travel
of the set along a track, there will be relatively movement between the IPW 3 and
adjacent wagons, it is necessary to provide for some degree of play of the roof 17
relative to the IPW 3. This may be achieved by the arrangement shown in Fig. 8 in
which a side of the roof 17 (only part of which is shown) is illustrated as having
an inverted T-formation 18 which locates with play in a bracket 19 which is associated
with a lifting cylinder 20. The dimensioning of the inverted T-formation relative
to the recess in bracket 19 is such that a degree of both side, forwards and backwards,
and vertical play is allowed for the T-formation 18 (without of course the T-formation
being above to come out of the bracket 19).
[0032] As mentioned above, the ends of roof 17 overlap, and are in engagement, with the
roofs of the adjacent wagons. During travel of the set, relative articulating movement
(horizontal or vertical) between the IPW and its adjacent wagons (such as causes movement
of roof 17 relative to IPW 3) is allowed by virtue of the play of T-formation 18 within
bracket 19.
[0033] Reference is now made particularly to the end of wagon 2 (see Fig. 6). As described
above, the bogies 5 and 6 may be of comparatively small diameter, with the result
that the lowered deck of the set is below the buffer height (1054mm) as prescribed
by British Rail for a vehicle travelling immediately behind (and coupled to) a locomotive.
This requirement is obviously imposed to ensure that the buffers of the locomotive
(which are at the prescribed height) can act against the buffers of the vehicle. Thus
as shown at the left-hand end of Fig. 6, the buffers 21 must (for the purposes of
the end vehicle 2 being coupled to a locomotive) be at a height above the lower deck
of the wagon 2. However, this positioning of the buffers does not allow the lower
deck to be unloaded from the set 1. In order to overcome this problem, the buffers
21 are mounted on a buffer beam 22 which (when the set 2 has been uncoupled from a
locomotive) can be lowered in the direction of arrow Z to the position illustrated
in chain dot line. At this position, the top of the buffer beam 22 is below the level
of the lower deck. It is envisaged that this lowering of the buffer beam 22 (which
will be effected by rams 23 provided at each side of wagon 2) may be associated with
the automatic lowering of a door to provide a platform over which cars may be run
for the loading or unloading of the set 1.
[0034] A further point which arises is that existing installations for the loading of cars
onto railway vehicles have been designed on the basis that the railway vehicle has
standard sized wheels. Since the set illustrated in the drawings will have comparatively
small wheels (e.g. less than 700mm) the lower deck of the set may be lower than the
loading point of the existing installation. To cater for this problem, it is proposed
that beam 24 be mounted along the underside of the buffer beam 22 and be moveable
downwards relative thereto by means of rams 25 provided at each side of the wagon
2. This beam 24 carries on its underside two pads 26 each of which is positioned above
one of the railway tracks. With the buffer beam 22 in its lowermost position, the
beam 24 may be lowered further by means of the ram 25 so as to bring the pads 26 into
engagement with the rails. Further extension of the rams 25 causes the end of the
wagon 2 to be raised from the rails to a height suitable for loading and unloading
cars from the existing installation.
[0035] As thus far described, reference has been made only to a single set 1 as illustrated
in Fig. 1. It is however envisaged that a train may comprise a locomotive hauling
two or more such sets from the loading point. Fig. 9 shows the end wagons 2 of two
such sets coupled together and in a condition for loading vehicles onto the sets.
Each of the end wagons 2 illustrated in Fig. 9 has its buffers 21 in the lowermost
position with a platform 27 extending over the buffers 27. Therefore, cars may be
loaded onto the lower deck at one end of the train and be run along one set 1, over
the platform 27 and into the adjacent set. The platform 27 may be comprised of a "half
platform" from one end wagon 2 and another "half platform" from the adjacent wagon
2. Provided that the sets are not intended to be uncoupled before reaching their final
destination, they may travel with a car at least partially on platform 27. In this
case side closures will be required between the sets to prevent unauthorised access
to the sets. Alternatively, in the case where it is envisaged that the sets will be
split, the half platforms are raised to seal off the ends of the lower decks prior
to travel of the train.
[0036] The adjacent ends of the upper decks of the wagons 2 are each covered by the respective
lifting roof 28 raised and lowered by rams 29. Each roof 28 has a closure arrangement
formed as an upper vertical half shutter 30 and a lower half shutter 31 (see also
Fig. 6) which is automatically lowered when the roof is raised so that the two half
shutters 31 (one on each end wagon 2) are horizontal and cooperate to provide a platform
over which cars may be run from one set to the other. When the roofs 28 are lowered,
the half shutters 31 are raised back to the vertical position so that they each cooperate
with their respective half shutters 30 so as to close the top deck.
[0037] As mentioned above, centre wagons 4 do not have their own wheel sets. If it is necessary,
for maintenance purposes, to uncouple a wagon 4 from the adjacent IPWs 3 then landing
legs 32 at each end of wagon 4 may be lowered so as to support the wagon body (see
Fig. 6). Similar landing legs are also provided at the "inner" ends of each end wagon
2 since these ends are not supported on their own wheel sets.
[0038] A further feature of the illustrated set 1 relates to yaw damping and roll control.
Since the centre wagons 3 are freely centrally pivoted along the centreline of the
body it would (in the absence of some form of restraining means) be possible for them
to roll over sideways. This problem is overcome in the illustrated wagon set by providing
a restraint at a height above the pivot or to the sides of the pivot. A particularly
suitable arrangement is schematically illustrated in Fig. 10 which shows the restraint
(at one side of the set) between an IPW 3 and either a centre wagon 4 or end wagon
2. (For the purpose of clarity, Figs. 10(a) and 10(b) omit details of the rubber door
15 and metal shutter 14). Fig. 10(a) shows the restraint in plan view whereas Fig.
10(b) shows the restraint in side view.
[0039] The restraining means is provided at the level of the upper deck solebar at each
side of the set and comprises a resilient buffer 33 (with attached wear plates 34)
mounted on the upper deck solebar of wagon 4 (or 2) and a friction plate 35 on the
upper deck solebar of IPW 3. Friction plate 35 engages against wearplate 34 and there
is a pre-loaded resilience in buffer 33.
[0040] Any tendency of the wagon 4 (or 2) to roll relative to IPW 3 is countered by virtue
of the engagement of friction plate 35 with wear plate 34, which engagement also serves
to damp out yaw motion. The restraining means also provides damping for the IPW 3.
[0041] An advantage of the illustrated construction of vehicle set 1 which arises from the
use of a small wheeled bogie is that the upper and lower decks may be flat beds (as
opposed to decks which are turfed in transverse cross-section as used on conventional
car carrying railway wagons). This use of flat beds improves loading and loadability
of the wagons.
[0042] Although the invention has been specifically described with respect to a "double-deck"
car carrier, it will of course be appreciated that the set 1 could equally well be
of single deck construction for conveying larger motor vehicles.
[0043] It will also be appreciated that vehicle sets in accordance with the invention may
be constructed other than as motor vehicle carriers.
1. A set of railway vehicles comprising a first major length vehicle coupled to a minor
length vehicle having a radiussed end which is in spaced nested relationship with
a correspondingly radiussed end of the first vehicle.
2. A set as claimed in claim 1 comprising a plurality of the first major length vehicles
between each adjacent pair of which is a minor length vehicle coupled to the first
vehicle and having radiussed ends which are in spaced nested relationship with substantially
corresponding radiussed ends of the first vehicle.
3. A set as claimed in claim 2 wherein each terminal vehicle of the set is a first major
length vehicle, and there is at least one extra first major length vehicle in the
set.
4. A set as claimed in claim 3 wherein the running wheels for the set are provided on
the second minor length vehicles and also at the outer ends of the terminal vehicles,
the or each extra first vehicle does not have wheels and is supported by the adjacent
second minor length vehicles, and the inner ends of the terminal vehicles are also
supported by the adjacent second minor length vehicles.
5. A set as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein adjacent ends of the first and
second vehicles are connected by a coupling which is pivotal about a vertical axis
on which the radiussed end of the second vehicle is centred.
6. A set as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the connection between each adjacent
vehicle of the set is a rigid connection.
7. A set as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6 which is a motor vehicle transporter
and which has at least one deck along which a motor vehicle may be driven from one
end of the set to the other.
8. A set as claimed in claim 7 which is of double-deck construction.
9. A set as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8 wherein the wheels are of a diameter
less than 700 mm.
10. A set as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 9 wherein a gap between adjacent vehicles
is covered by a first gap closure member on one vehicle locating at least partially
behind a second gap closure member of the other vehicle, said first gap closure member
being capable of relative movement behind the second gap closure member during travel
of the vehicle set.
11. A set as claimed in claim 10 wherein at least one of the gap closure members is pivotally
mounted on its respective vehicle so as to be openable laterally outwardly of the
vehicle.
12. A set as claimed in claim 10 or 11 wherein the first gap closure member covers a lower
opening on one vehicle and the second gap closure member covers an upper opening on
the other vehicle.
13. A set as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12 wherein adjacent vehicles are provided
at each side thereof above the level of the coupling between the vehicles with restraining
means for resisting relative roll of the two vehicles.
14. A set as claimed in claim 13 wherein the restraining means comprise, at each side
of the set, a resilient member on one of the vehicles in engagement with a reaction
member (e.g. a friction plate) on the other vehicle.
15. A set as claimed in claim 14 wherein the resilient means and reaction member are mounted
on upper solebars of the respective vehicles.
16. A set as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 16 wherein one or both terminal vehicles
of the set are provided with means which may be lowered to engage the ground and/or
rails to raise the end of the vehicle.
17. A set as claimed in claim 16 wherein the means which may be lowered to engage the
ground and/or rail comprises a reaction beam mounted beneath a buffer beam of the
vehicle, said reaction beam being lowerable by means of rams which, when the reaction
beam has engaged the ground and/or rails are effective to raise the end of the vehicle.
18. A set as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 17 wherein at least one of the end vehicles
has a set of buffers which are vertically movable between upper and lower positions.
19. A vehicle for use in a railway vehicle set as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 18.
20. A set of railway vehicles wherein a gap between adjacent vehicles is covered (at least
at the sides of the vehicles) by a first gap closure member on one vehicle locating
at least partially behind a second gap closure member of the other vehicle, said gap
closure members being capable of movement relative to each other during travel of
the train.
21. A set as claimed in claim 20 wherein one or both gap closure members is pivotally
mounted on its respective vehicle so as to be openable laterally outwardly of the
vehicle to gain access, for example, to side entrance openings provided in one or
both vehicles.
22. A vehicle set comprising a pair of adjacent railway vehicles coupled together wherein
provided at each side of the vehicle of the coupling are restraining means for resisting
relative roll of the two vehicles.
23. A set as claimed in claim 22 wherein the restraining means comprise, at each side
of the set, a resilient member on one of the vehicles in engagement with a reaction
member (e.g. a friction plate) on the other vehicle.
24. A set as claimed in claim 23 wherein the resilient means and reaction member are mounted
on upper solebars of the adjacent vehicles.
25. A railway vehicle having at one end means which may be lowered to engage the ground
and/or rails and raise that end of the vehicle.
26. A railway vehicle having at least one set of buffers which are vertically movable
between upper and lower positions.
27. A railway vehicle set substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to any
one of the accompanying drawings.