Field of the Invention
[0001] This invention relates to detergent compositions, particularly but not exclusively
to built detergent compositions for washing fabrics.
Background of the Invention
[0002] Detergent compositions traditionally contain one of more detergent active materials
in addition to various other ingredients such as detergency builders, bleaches, flourescers,
perfumes etc. Notable applications of detergent compositions are to clean fabrics,
usually by washing portable fabric items in a bowl or in a washing machine, to clean
crockery and cooking utensils, again by washing in a bowl (hand dishwashing), and
to clean hard surfaces such as glass, glazed surfaces, plastics, metals and enamels.
A number of classes of surfactant materials have been used as detergent active materials,
including anionic and nonionic materials.
[0003] One known category of nonionic surfactants are compounds which are often known as
alkylpolyglycosides. These are of the general formula

in which R is an organic hydrophobic residue, R′O is an alkoxy group which may be
absent because t can be zero, and G is a saccharide residue and x is at least unity.
A more detailed definition is set out hereinafter.
[0004] We have now found that a combination of alkylpolyglycoside with certain unethoxylated
nonionic surfactants provides unexpected advantages. Such combinations have been found
to give a synergistic benefit of enhanced oily/fatty soil detergency. Furthermore,
such combinations have been found to provide stable structured liquid detergent compositions
containing significant levels of nonionic surfactant. By eliminating ethylene oxide
groups from the nonionic surfactant, aquatic toxicity is reduced and the possibility
of carcinogenic contamination removed.
[0005] EP 75 995A and EP 75 996A (Procter & Gamble) disclose alkylpolyglycosides in combination
with various nonionic surfactants. Among the numerous classes of nonionic cosurfactants
disclosed are glyceryl ethers of the general formula

wherein R⁹ is a C₈₋₁₈ alkyl or alkenyl group or a C₅₋₁₄ alkaryl group and n is from
0 to 6; but conventional ethoxylated alcohol nonionic surfactants are preferred and
specifically exemplified.
Definition of the invention
[0006] According to the present invention there is provided a detergent composition containing
(i) an alkylpolyglycoside of the general formula

in which R is an organic hydrophobic residue containing 10 to 20 carbon atoms, R′
contains 2 to 4 carbon atoms, G is a saccharide residue containing 5 or 6 carbon atoms,
t is in the range 0 to 25 and x is in the range from 1 to 10;
(ii) a nonionic surfactant which is chosen from
(a) ethers and esters of the respective formulae

wherein R³ is an organic hydrophobic residue having from 7 to 20 carbon atoms and
denotes part of a polyhydric alcohol whose formula is HOZ and which has 2 to 4 carbon
atoms,
(b) C₈ to C₂₀ esters of reducing saccharides containing 5 or 6 carbon atoms,
(c) aliphatic alcohols of 6 to 20 carbon atoms,
and mixtures of any of these surfactants.
[0007] The weight ratio of the alkyl polyglycoside and the other specified surfactant(s)
will generally lie within a range of 20:1 to 1:20 and may lie in a narrower range
from 9:1 to 1:9 or even 4:1 to 1:4. The preferred ratio of the surfactants will depend
on the specific surfactants and the nature of the product.
[0008] For structured liquids it will generally be desirable to achieve both good stability
and good but not necessarily optimum detergency. For particulate compositions it may
be possible to optimise detergency.
[0009] The weight ratio range which gives synergy will vary depending on the specific surfactants
used and can be determined by experiment.
[0010] The invention also provides a method of washing which comprises contacting fabrics,
or an inanimate surface to be cleaned, with a composition according to this invention
or a wash liquor obtainable by adding the composition to water, notably in an amount
ranging from 0.5 to 50 grams of composition per litre of water.
The alkylpolyglycoside (i)
[0011] In the general formula

the hydrophobic group R is preferably aliphatic, either saturated or unsaturated,
notably straight or branched alkyl, alkenyl, hydroxyalkyl or hydroxyalkenyl. However,
it may include an aryl group for example alkyl-aryl, alkenyl-aryl and hydroxyalkyl-aryl.
Particularly preferred is that R is alkyl or alkenyl of 8 to 16 carbon atoms.
[0012] The value of t in the general formula above is preferably zero, so that the -(RO)
t- unit of the general formula is absent. In that case the general formula becomes

[0013] If t is non-zero it is preferred that R′O is an ethylene oxide residue. Other likely
possibilities are propylene oxide and glycerol residues. If the parameter t is non-zero
so that R′O is present, the value of t (which may be an average value) will preferably
lie in the range from 0.5 to 10.
[0014] The group G is typically derived from fructose, glucose, mannose, galactose, talose,
gulose, allose, altrose, idose, arabinose, xylose, lyxose and/or ribose. Preferably,
the G is provided substantially exclusively by glucose units.
[0015] The value x, which is an average, is usually termed the degree of polymerisation.
Desirably x varies between 1 and 8. Values of x may lie between 1 and 3, especially
1 and 1.8.
[0016] Polyglycosides of particular interest have x in the narrow range from 1 or 1.2 up
to 1.4 or especially 1.3. If x exceeds 1.3 it preferably lies in the range 1.3 or
1.4 to 1.8.
[0017] When x lies in the range 1 to 1.4 it is preferred that R is C₈ to C₁₄ alkyl or alkenyl.
The even narrower range of C₈ to C₁₂ may be used.
The nonionic surfactant (ii)
[0018] These specified nonionic surfactants are generally hydrophobic in character. This
is manifested by formation of a turbid dispersion rather than an isotropic solution
when placed, alone, in deionised water at a surfactant concentration of 1% or more
by weight.
[0019] A first possible class of cosurfactants is comprised by monoglyceryl ethers or esters
with the respective formulae

in which R³ is as specified previously, i.e. an organic hydrophobic residue of 7 to
20 carbon atoms. R³ is preferably a saturated or unsaturated aliphatic residue. In
particular R³ may be linear or branched alkyl or alkenyl. More preferably, R³ is a
substantially linear alkyl or alkenyl moiety having from 8 to 16 carbon atoms, notably
a C₈-C₁₂ alkyl moiety. Moat preferably, R³ is decyl, undecyl or dodecyl.
[0020] The monoglyceryl ethers of alkanols are known materials and can be prepared, for
example, by the condensation of a higher alkanol with glycidol. Glycerol monoesters
are of course well known and available from various suppliers including Alkyril Chemicals
Inc.
[0021] Another possibility for the nonionic surfactant (ii) is comprised by C₇ to C₂₀ acyl
mono and di esters of C₂-C₄ polyhydric alcohols other than glycerol which has already
been mentioned. C₇ to C₂₀ ethers of such alcohols are also possible.
[0022] Yet another possibility is C₆ to C₂₀ aliphatic alcohol. Preferably such alcohol has
10 to 18 carbon atoms.
[0023] As also mentioned above, yet another possibility is a C₈ to C₂₀ ester of a reducing
hexose or pentose sugar. Such a compound is also referred to as an 0-alkanoyl derivative
of the sugar.
[0024] O-alkanoyl glucosides are described in WO 88/10147A (Novo Industri A/S). In particular
the surfactants described therein are glucose esters with the acyl group attached
in the 3- or 6- position such as 3-0-acyl-D-glucose or 6-0-acyl-D-glucose. In the
present invention we prefer to use a 6-0-alkanoyl glucoside, especially compounds
having the formula:

wherein R⁵ is an alkyl or alkenyl group having from 7 to 19 preferably 11 to 19 carbon
atoms, and R⁶ is hydrogen or an alkyl group having from 1 to 4 carbon atoms.
[0025] Most preferred are such compounds where R⁶ is an alkyl group, such as ethyl or isopropyl.
Alkylation in the 1- position enables such compounds to be prepared by regiospecific
enzymatic synthesis as described by Bjorkling et al. (J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commum.
1989 p934) the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
[0026] While the above description concerns surfactants based on glucose, it is envisaged
that corresponding materials based on other reducing sugars, such as galactose and
mannose are also suitable.
Further surfactants
[0027] Detergent compositions of the invention may contain further surfactants, outside
the definitions stated for (i) and (ii). The amount of any additional surfactant will
frequently be less than 50% by weight, and perhaps less than 25% or even 10% by weight
of the overall surfactant mixture.
[0028] Additional surfactant, if present, may be anionic, nonionic or amphoteric. Cationic
surfactant is possible if anionic surfactant is absent. In particular, nonionic surfactant
with an HLB value greater than 10.5 may be present. This may for instance be ethoxylated
fatty alcohol.
[0029] Compositions of this invention will generally contain a surfactant mixture comprising
(i) the specified alkylpolyglycoside (ii) the specified nonionic surfactant and (iii)
any other surfactant(s), in a total amount which is from 1 to 60% by weight of the
composition.
[0030] Preferred amounts are 2 to 45%, better 5 to 40% or 35%. The amount of the specified
surfactants (i) and (ii) may itself be at least 2% or at least 5% of the overall composition.
Other ingredients
[0031] The compositions of the invention may contain an electrolyte, for instance present
in such an amount to give a concentration of at least 0.01 molar, when the composition
is added to water at a concentration of 1 g/litre. Electrolyte concentration may possibly
be higher such as at least 0.05 or 0.1 molar especially if the composition is of solid
form: liquid compositions generally limit electrolyte for the sake of stability. 1
g/litre is approximately the lowest level at which detergent compositions for fabric
washing are used in usual practice. More usual is usage at a level of 4 to 50 g/litre.
The amount of electrolyte may be such as to achieve an electrolyte concentration of
0.01 molar, most preferably at least 0.1 molar, when the composition is added to water
at a concentration of 4 g/litre.
[0032] If the composition of the invention is intended as a fabric washing composition it
will generally contain detergency builder in an amount from 7 to 70% by weight of
the composition.
[0033] If it is in solid form, the composition is likely to contain at least 10 or 15% of
builder.
[0034] It is desirable that the compositions according to the invention be approximately
neutral or at least slightly alkaline, that is when the composition is dissolved in
an amount to give surfactant concentration of 1 g/l in distilled water at 25°C the
pH should desirably be at least 7.5. For solid compositions the pH will usually be
greater, such as at least 9. To achieve the required pH, the compositions may include
a water-soluble alkaline salt. This salt may be a detergency builder (as described
in more detail below) or a non-building alkaline material.
[0035] When the compositions of the invention contain a detergency builder material, this
may be any material capable of reducing the level of free calcium ions in the wash
liquor and will preferably provide the compositions with other beneficial properties
such as the generation of an alkaline pH and the suspension of soil removed from the
fabric.
[0036] Examples of phosphorus-containing inorganic detergency builders, when present, include
the water-soluble salts, especially alkali metal pyrophosphates, orthophosphates,
polyphosphates and phosphonates. Specific examples of inorganic phosphate builders
include sodium and potassium tripolyphosphates, ortho phosphates and hexametaphosphates.
[0037] Examples of non-phosphorus-containing inorganic detergency builders, when present,
include water-soluble alkali metal carbonates, bicarbonates, silicates and crystalline
and amorphous alumino silicates. Specific examples include sodium carbonate (with
or without calcite seeds), potassium carbonate (with or without calcite seeds), sodium
and potassium bicarbonates and silicates.
[0038] Examples of organic detergency builders, when present include the alkali metal, ammonium
and substituted ammonium polyacetates, carboxylates, polycarboxylates, polyacetyl
carboxylates and polyhydroxysulphonates. Specific examples include sodium, potassium,
lithium, ammonium and substituted ammonium salts of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,
nitrilotriacetic acid, oxydisuccinic acid, melitic acid, benzene polycarboxylic acids
and citric acid. Further possibilities are tartrate monosuccinates, tartrate disuccinates,
dipicolinic acid, cheledamic acid, carboxymethyloxysuccinate and hydroxyethyl imino
diacetic acid.
[0039] Examples of other optional ingredients which may be present in the composition are
polymers containing carboxylic or sulphonic acid groups in acid form or wholly or
partially neutralised to sodium or potassium salts, the sodium salts being preferred.
Preferred polymers are homopolymers and copolymers of acrylic acid and/or maleic acid
or maleic anhydride. Of especial iterest are polyacrylates, polyalphahydroxyacrylates,
acrylic/maleic acid copolymers, and acrylic phosphinates. Other polymers which are
especially preferred for use in liquid detergent compositions are deflocculating polymers
such as for example disclosed in EP 346 995A (Unilever).
[0040] The molecular weights of homopolymers and copolymers are generally 1000 to 150 000,
preferably 1500 to 100 000. The amount of any polymer may lie in the range from 0.5
to 5% by weight of the composition. Other suitable polymeric materials are cellulose
ethers such as carboxy methyl cellulose, methyl cellulose, hydroxy alkyl celluloses,
and mixed ethers, such as methyl hydroxy ethyl cellulose, methyl hydroxy propyl cellulose,
and methyl carboxy methyl cellulose. Mixtures of different cellulose ethers, particularly
mixtures of carboxy methyl cellulose and methyl cellulose, are suitable.
[0041] Polyethylene glycol of molecular weight from 400 to 50 000, preferably from 1000
to 10 000, and copolymers of polyethylene oxide with polypropylene oxide are suitable
as also are copolymers of polyacrylate with polyethylene glycol. Polyvinyl pyrrolidone
of molecular weight of 10 000 to 60 000 preferably of 30 000 to 50 000 and copolymers
of polyvinyl pyrrolidone with other poly pyrrolidones are suitable. Polyacrylic phosphinates
and related copolymers of molecular weight 1000 to 100 000, in particular 3000 to
30 000 are also suitable.
[0042] Further examples of other ingredients which may be present in the composition include
fabric softening agents such as fatty amines, fabric softening clay materials, lather
boosters such as alkanolamides, particularly the monoethanolamides derived from palm
kernel fatty acids and coconut fatty acids, lather depressants, oxygen-releasing bleaching
agents such as sodium perborate and sodium percarbonate, typically accompanied by
peracid bleach precursors, organic peracids, chlorine-releasing bleaching agents such
as trichloroisocyanuric acid, inorganic salts such as sodium sulphate, and, usually
present in very minor amounts, fluorescent agents, perfumes including deodorant perfumes,
enzymes such as cellulases, proteases, lipases and amylases, germicides and colourants.
Product forms
[0043] The detergent compositions according to the invention may be in any suitable form
including powders, bars, liquids and pastes. For example suitable liquid compositions
may be non-aqueous or aqueous, the latter being either isotropic or lamellar structured.
The compositions may be prepared by a number of different methods according to their
physical form. In the case of granular products they may be prepared by dry-mixing,
coagglomeration, spray-drying from an aqueous slurry or any combination of these methods.
[0044] One preferred physical form is a granule incorporating a detergency builder salt.
This may be prepared by conventional granulation techniques or spray drying.
[0045] Another preferred physical form is a lamellar structured aqueous liquid. Structuring
a liquid by means of surfactant is well known and may be utilised to provide consumer-preferred
flow properties, and/or turbid appearance. Also many liquids in which the surfactant
mixture provides structure are capable of suspending particulate solids such as detergency
builders and abrasives. For such forms, alkyl polyglycosides which are particularly
suitable have a HLB of at least 12.0 and in the formula

t is zero or 1 to 3, preferably zero, while
x is 1 to 3, especially 1 to 1.8.
[0046] The aqueous continuous phase will usually contain some dissolved electrolyte. Electrolyte
may be dissolved only in the aqueous continuous phase or may also be present as suspended
solid particles. Particles of solid materials which are insoluble in the aqueous phase
may be suspended alternatively or in addition to any solid electrolyte particles.
[0047] Although structured liquids require some electrolyte to be present in the continuous
phase, the amount which is present generally has to be limited for the sake of stability.
When the present invention takes the form of a structured liquid, an advantage is
that the structuring conferred by the surfactant mixture of the invention will tolerate
a substantial amount of electrolyte.
[0048] Three common product forms which are of the structured liquid types are liquids for
heavy duty fabrics washing, liquid abrasives and general purpose cleaners.
[0049] In the first class, the suspended solid can comprise suspended solids which are substantially
the same as the dissolved electrolyte, being an excess of same beyond the solubility
limit. This solid is usually present as a detergency builder, i.e. to counteract the
effects of calcium ion water hardness in the wash.
[0050] In the second class, the suspended solid usually comprises a particulate abrasive,
insoluble in the system. In that case the electrolyte, present to contribute to the
structuring of the active material in the dispersed phase, is generally different
from the abrasive compounds. In certain cases, the abrasive can however comprise partially
soluble salts which dissolve when the product is diluted.
[0051] In the third class, the structure is usually used for thickening the product to give
consumer- preferred flow properties, and sometimes to suspend pigment particles.
[0052] The invention will now be further illustrated by the following non-limiting Examples,
in which parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise stated.
EXAMPLES
Example 1
[0053] Aqueous wash liquors were prepared containing the following materials in deionised
water.

[0054] These quantities would be typical of using 6 g/litre of a particulate detergent product
containing 16.7 % by weight surfactant. The wash liquors had pH of about 10, resulting
from the presence of the metaborate.
[0055] The alkylpolyglycoside was APG 300 from Horizon Chemical Co. This was of the formula

where R is a 9 to 11 carbon alkyl chain, G is glucose and x has an average value
of 1.4.
[0056] The decyl monoglyceryl ether was from Unichema. Its formula was

where R³ was C₁₀ alkyl.
[0057] Wash liquors were prepared with various ratios of the two surfactants and used to
wash polyester test cloths soiled with radiolabelled triolein. Washing was carried
out at 40°C for 20 minutes in a Tergotometer.
[0058] The removal of triolein was determined and the results are set out in Table 1 below.
Example 2
[0059] Example 1 was repeated, using 1-O-ethyl 6-0-dodecanoylglucoside (from Novo Industri)
as the hydrophobic nonionic surfactant. Such a material conforms to the general formula
(A) above with R⁵ = C₁₂ alkyl and R⁶ = ethyl. Again results are included in Table
1.
Examples 3 and 4
[0060] Examples 1 and 2 were repeated using a different alkylpolyglycoside. APG 500 from
Horizon was used. This has the formula

where R is C₁₂ and C₁₃ alkyl, G is glucose and x is 1.4.
[0061] Results are set out in Table 2 below.

[0062] It can be seen from the tables that in every example there is a mixture of surfactants
which gives better triolein removal than either individual surfactant. The proportions
giving synergy depended on the nature of the surfactants and can be found by experiments
such as these.
Examples 5 to 7
[0063] Structured liquid compositions were prepared with the formulations given below. In
each case the formulations were prepared by mixing the nonionic surfactants together
and then dispersing this premix into a mixture of water and the other ingredients.
[0064] The alkylpolyglycoside was APG 600 from Horizon which has the formula

where R is derived from coconut, and is C₁₂ to C₁₆, predominantly C₁₂ and C₁₄, G
is glucose and x has an average value of 1.4.
[0065] The monoglyceryl ester was the same as used in Example 1.
[0066] Synperonic A7 is C₁₃-C₁₅ alcohol ethoxylated with an average of 7 ethylene oxide
residues. HLB value is 11.7.
[0067] The formulations were:

[0068] The compositions were stable and showed no phase separation on storage for at least
one week at ambient temperatures.
[0069] The pH of the compositions was approximately 7.5.
Example 8
[0070] A structured liquid composition was prepared by adding the ingredients in the following
order: Water, fluorescer, zeolite, APG (as 50% active material in water), citrate,
citric acid, glycerol, borax, a premix of Synperonic A7 and the glyceryl ether, then
remaining ingredients. The formulation was:

[0071] The glyceryl ether was the same material as used in Examples 1 and 5.
[0072] Narlex LD31 is a polyacrylate having a molecular weight of about 4000, ex National
Starch;
DB 100 is a silicone antifoam material ex Dow Corning.
[0073] Tinopal CBS-X is a fluorescer material.
[0074] The composition did not show any phase separation upon storage for 2 months at ambient
temperature, the viscosity of the product was 830 mPas at 21 s⁻¹, the pH of the product
was 8.1.
Examples 9 and 10
[0075] Two suitable formulations for a granular detergent composition are as follows:

[0076] The granular compositions may be prepared by agglomeration of the ingredients into
granules using a pan granulator, or can be produced by conventional spray drying and
post dosing.
Example 11, Comparative Example A
[0077] Wash liquors were prepared containing 5 g/l each of the formulations given below,
typical of granular detergent compositions free of sodium sulphate, in 24°FH water.
Radio-labelled triolein removal was monitored in a 20-minute wash at 40°C as described
in Example 1.

[0078] The glyceryl ether was the same material as used in Example 1.
[0079] The APG 600 was a similar material to that used in Example 5, but obtained from Henkel
Chemical Company.
[0080] Sokalan (Trade Mark) CP5 is an acrylic/maleic copolymer ex BASF.
[0081] The system containing the low-HLB cosurfactant clearly gave the better cleaning.
Example 12, Comparative Example B
[0082] The procedure of Examples 11 and A was repeated using wash liquors containing the
formulations given below, containing sodium sulphate and a lower surfactant level,
at concentrations of 6 g/l.

[0083] Again, the system containing the low-HLB cosurfactant gave the better cleaning.
Example 13, Comparative Examples C to E
[0084] In this Example, the combination of APG 600 (as used in Examples 11 and 12) with
C₁₀ monoglyceryl ether was compared with combinations of APG 600 with ethoxylated
C₁₀ monoglyceryl ethers. The methodology was as in Example 1, the surfactant systems
being dissolved to a total concentration of 1 g/l in 0.05M sodium metaborate at 40°C
in demineralised water.
[0085] The cosurfactants used were as follows:
- Example 13:
- C₁₀ glyceryl monoether (as Example 1)
- Example C:
- C₁₀ (EO)₂ glyceryl monoether
- Example D:
- C₁₀ (EO)₄ glyceryl monoether
- Example E:
- C₁₀ (EO)₆ glyceryl monoether
[0086] The results are shown in Table 3, where the asterisked figures represent the highest
detergency attained with each combination.

[0087] Alone, all the ethoxylated glyceryl ethers were clearly better surfactants than the
unethoxylated material, the 2EO glyceryl ether being the best and detergency then
deteriorating with increasing degree of ethoxylation; the 2EO and 4EO materials being
superior to APG 600 alone, while the 6EO material was inferior.
[0088] As expected, combination of APG 600 with the 2EO material gave no advantage but simply
reduced the detergency towards the lower value shown by the APG alone. With the 4EO
material, a small synergistic benefit was found but the effect of the cosurfactant
clearly predominated, the maximum detergency being observed at 20% APG/80% cosurfactant
and being only slightly higher than that of the cosurfactant alone. With the 6EO material,
the converse was true: a very small synergistic effect was possibly present but the
effect of the APG clearly predominated, the maximum detergency being observed at 80%
APG/20% cosurfactant and being only slightly higher than that of the APG alone.
[0089] The unethoxylated material, however, which on its own showed very poor detergency,
exhibited very strong synergy with the APG and the maximum detergency, at 60% APG/40%
cosurfactant, was substantially higher than that of the APG alone and only slightly
lower than that obtained from the combination of APG with the much more efficient
4EO material.
1 A detergent composition containing
(i) an alkylpolyglycoside of the general formula

in which R is an organic hydrophobic resisue containing 10 to 20 carbon atoms, R′
contains 2 to 4 carbon atoms, G is a saccharide residue containing 5 or 6 carbon atoms,
t is in the range 0 to 25 and x is in the range from 1 to 10;
and (ii) a nonionic surfactant, characterised in that the nonionic surfactant (ii)
is chosen from:
(a) ethers and esters of the respective formulae

wherein R³ is an organic hydrophobic residue having from 7 to 20 carbon atoms and
denotes part of a polyhydric alcohol whose formula is HOZ and which has 2 to 4 carbon
atoms,
(b) C₈ to C₂₀ estere of reducing saccharides containing 5 or 6 carbon atoms,
(c) aliphatic alcohols of 6 to 20 carbon atoms, and mixtures of any of these surfactants.
2 A detergent composition according to claim 1, characterised in that the alkylpolyglycoside
(i) has a value of t which is zero so that it is of the general formula
3 A detergent composition according to claim 1 or claim 2, characterised in that the
alkylpolyglycoside (i) has an average value of x in the range from 1 to 1.8.
4 A detergent composition according to claim 3, characterised in that the alkylpolyglycoside
(i) has an average value of x in the range from 1 to 1.4.
5 A detergent composition according to claim 3, characterised in that the alkylpolyglycoside
(i) has an average value of x in the range from 1.3 to 1.8.
6 A detergent composition according to any preceding claim, characterised in that the
weight ratio of the surfactants (i) and (ii) lies in the range from 1:9 to 9:1.
7 A detergent composition according to any one of the preceding claims, characterised
in that the nonionic surfactant (ii) (a) is a monoglyceryl ether or ester of respective
formulae
8 A detergent composition according to claim 9, characterised in that the nonionic
surfactant (ii) (a) is a monoglyceryl ether of formula

characterised in that R³ is an alkyl or alkenyl group having from 8 to 16 carbon
atoms.
9 A composition according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterised in that the nonionic
surfactant (ii)(b) is an ester of a reducing hexose sugar.
10 A composition according to claim 10, characterised in that the ester is 6-0-alkanoyl
glucoside.
11 A composition according to claim 10, characterised in that the 0-alkanoyl glucoside
has the formula

wherein R⁵ is an alkyl or alkenyl group having from 7 to 19 carbon atoms, and R⁶
is hydrogen or an alkyl group having from 1 to 4 carbon atoms.
12 A detergent composition according to any one of the preceding claims, characterised
in that it comprises 1 to 60% by weight of a surfactant mixture which contains the
said alkylpolyglycoside (i) and the said nonionic surfactant (ii) in amounts which
total 75 to 100% by weight of the surfactant mixture, the composition also containing
other ingredients and/or water.
13 A detergent composition according to claim 12, characterised in that it comprises
7 to 70% by weight of detergency builder.
14 A detergent composition according to any preceding claim, characterised in that it
is a structured aqueous liquid.
15 A method of cleaning characterised in that it comprises contacting fabrics or other
inanimate surface to be cleaned with a composition according to any one of the preceding
claims, or a wash liquor comprising water and a composition according to any one of
the preceding claims, added to the water in a quantity lying in a range from 0.5 to
50 grams per litre of water.