Cross-reference to Related Application
[0001] This application is a continuation-in-part of copending application Serial No. 07/525,800,
filed May 17, 1990 entitled "Non-Chromated Oxide Coating For Aluminum Substrates",
which application is incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1) Field of the Invention
[0002] This environmental-quality invention is in the field of chemical conversion coatings
formed on metal substrates, for example, on aluminum substrates. More particularly,
one aspect of the invention is a new type of oxide coating (which I refer to as a
"cobalt conversion coating") which is chemically formed on metal substrates. The invention
enhances the quality of the environment of mankind by contributing to the maintenance
of air and water quality.
2) Description of the Related Art
[0003] In general, chemical conversion coatings are formed chemically by causing the surface
of the metal to be "converted" into a tightly adherent coating, all or part of which
consists of an oxidized form of the substrate metal. Chemical conversion coatings
can provide high corrosion resistance as well as strong bonding affinity for paint.
The industrial application of paint (organic finishes) to metals generally requires
the use of a chemical conversion coating, particularly when the performance demands
are high.
[0004] Although aluminum protects itself against corrosion by forming a natural oxide coating,
the protection is not complete. In the presence of moisture and electrolytes, aluminum
alloys, particularly the high-copper 2000-series aluminum alloys, such as alloy 2024-T3,
corrode much more rapidly than pure aluminum.
[0005] In general, there are two types of processes for treating aluminum to form a beneficial
conversion coating. The first is by anodic oxidation (anodization) in which the aluminum
component is immersed in a chemical bath, such as a chromic or sulfuric acid bath,
and an electric current is passed through the aluminum component and the chemical
bath. The resulting conversion coating on the surface of the aluminum component offers
resistance to corrosion and a bonding surface for organic finishes.
[0006] The second type of process is by chemically producing a conversion coating, which
is commonly referred to as a chemical conversion coating, by subjecting the aluminum
component to a chemical solution, such as a chromic acid solution, but without using
an electric current in the process. The chemical solution may be applied by immersion
application, by manual application, or by spray application. The resulting conversion
coating on the surface of the aluminum component offers resistance to corrosion and
a bonding surface for organic finishes. The present invention relates to this second
type of process for producing chemical conversion coatings. The chemical solution
may be applied by immersion application, by various types of manual application, or
by spray application.
[0007] One widely-used chromic acid process for forming chemical conversion coatings on
aluminum substrates is described in various embodiments in Ostrander et al. U.S. Patent
2,796,370 and Ostrander et al. U.S. Patent 2,796,371, in military process specification
MIL-C-5541, and in Boeing Process Specification BAC 5719. These chromic acid chemical
conversion baths contain hexavalent chromium, fluorides, and cyanides, all of which
present significant environmental as well as health and safety problems. The constituents
of a typical chromic acid conversion bath, such as ALODINE 1200, are as follows: Cr0₃
- "chromic acid" (hexavalent chromium); NaF - sodium fluoride; KBF₄ - potassium tetrafluoroborate;
K₂ZrF₆ - potassium hexafluorozirconate; K₃Fe(CN)₆ - potassium ferricyanide; and, HNO₃
- nitric acid (for pH control).
[0008] Many aluminum structural parts, as well as Cd plated, Zn plated, Zn-Ni plated, and
steel parts, throughout the aircraft and aerospace industry are currently being treated
using this chromic acid process technology. Chromic acid conversion films, as formed
on aluminum substrates, meet a 168 hours corrosion resistance criterion, but they
primarily serve as a surface substrate for paint adhesion. Because of their relative
thinness and low coating weights (40-150 milligrams/ft²), chromic acid conversion
coatings do not cause a fatigue life reduction in the aluminum structure.
[0009] However, environmental regulations in the United States, particularly in California,
and in other countries are drastically reducing the allowed levels of hexavalent chromium
compounds in effluents and emissions from metal finishing processes. Accordingly,
chemical conversion processes employing hexavalent chromium compounds must be replaced.
The present invention, which does not employ hexavalent chromium compounds, is intended
to replace the previously used chromic acid process for forming conversion coatings
on aluminum substrates.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0010]
(A.) In one aspect, the invention is a process for forming a cobalt conversion coating
on a metal substrate, thereby imparting corrosion resistance and paint adhesion properties.
The invention was developed as a replacement for the prior art chromic acid process.
In a broad sense, the invention is a process for forming a cobalt conversion coating
on a metal substrate, the process comprising the steps of:
(a) providing a cobalt conversion solution comprising an aqueous solution of a soluble
cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex (hereafter referred to as cobalt-III complex),
the concentration of the cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex being from about 0.1 mole
per gallon of solution up to the saturation limit of said cobalt-III hexacoordinated
complex; and
(b) contacting the metal substrate with the solution for a sufficient amount of time,
whereby the cobalt conversion coating is formed.
The substrate may be aluminum or aluminum alloy, as well as magnesium and its alloys,
Cd plated substrates, and Zn plated substrates. The cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex
may be present in the form of Me₃[Co(NO₂)₆] wherein Me corresponds to Na, K, or Li.
(B.) In another aspect, the invention is a chemical conversion coating solution. In
a broad sense, the invention is a chemical conversion coating solution for producing
a cobalt conversion coating on a metal substrate, the solution comprising an aqueous
solution of a soluble cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex, the concentration of said
cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex being from about 0.1 mole per gallon of solution
up to the saturation limit of said cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex. The substrate
may be aluminum or aluminum alloy, as well as magnesium and its alloys, Cd plated
substrates, and Zn plated substrates. The cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex may be
present in the form of Me₃[Co(NO₂)₆] wherein Me corresponds to Na, K, or Li.
The cobalt conversion solution may be prepared by a bath makeup sequence including
the steps of: (a) dissolving a metal nitrite salt; (b) dissolving an accelerator such
as NaI; (c) dissolving a cobalt-II salt; and (d) then adding an oxidizer such as H₂O₂.
(C.) In yet another aspect, the invention is a coated article exhibiting corrosion
resistance and paint adhesion properties, the article including: (a) a metal substrate;
and (b) a cobalt conversion coating formed on the substrate, the cobalt conversion
coating including aluminum oxide Al₂O₃ as the largest volume percent, and one or more
cobalt oxides from the group consisting of CoO, Co₃O₄, and Co₂O₃. The substrate may
be aluminum or aluminum alloy, as well as magnesium and its alloys, Cd plated substrates,
and Zn plated substrates.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] The figures herein are photomicrographs of images produced by a scanning electron
microscope (SEM) of coatings on aluminum alloy test panels. FIGS. 1-20 are photomicrographs
(scanning electron microscope operated at 20 KV) of aluminum alloy 2024-T3 test panels
with cobalt conversion coatings made by the invention. FIGS. 1-16 show surface views
and fracture views of unsealed cobalt conversion coatings. The photomicrographs of
FIGS. 1-16 reveal a highly porous surface oxide (unsealed cobalt conversion coatings)
with a thickness range of about 0.12 to 0.14 micron (1200 to 1400 Angstroms). FIGS.
1-4 show an unsealed cobalt conversion coating formed by a 20 minute immersion in
a typical cobalt coating solution. FIGS. 5-8 show an unsealed cobalt conversion coating
formed by a 30 minute immersion in a typical cobalt coating solution. FIGS. 9-12 show
an unsealed cobalt conversion coating formed by a 50 minute immersion in a typical
cobalt coating solution. FIGS. 13-16 show an unsealed cobalt conversion coating formed
by a 60 minute immersion in a typical cobalt coating solution. There were only minor
differences in oxide coating thickness between these immersion times. This suggests
that at any given bath operating temperature, the oxide structure becomes self limiting.
FIGS. 17-20 show surface views and fracture views of a sealed cobalt conversion coating.
[0012] FIG. 1 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a cobalt
conversion coating 130 of the invention. The photomicrograph is a top view, from an
elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 130. The top of oxide coating
130 is porous and looks like a layer of chow mein noodles. The porosity of oxide coating
130 gives excellent paint adhesion results. This test panel was immersed in a cobalt
conversion coating solution for 20 minutes. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
[0013] FIG. 2 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 1.
The photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of
oxide coating 130. FIG. 2 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area
of FIG. 1. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
[0014] FIG. 3 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a side
view of a fractured cross section of a cobalt conversion coating 130 of the invention.
The fractured cross section of the aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated
by reference numeral 132. This test panel was immersed in a coating bath for 20 minutes.
To make the photomicrograph, the test panel was bent and broken off to expose a cross
section of oxide coating 130. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
[0015] FIG. 4 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 3
showing a side view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 130
of the invention. FIG. 4 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of
FIG. 3. The aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral
132. The white bar is a length of 1 micron. Oxide coating 130 has a vertical thickness
of about 0.12-0.14 micron.
[0016] FIG. 5 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of another test panel showing
another cobalt conversion coating 150 of the invention. The photomicrograph is a top
view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 150. The top of
oxide coating 150 is porous and looks like a layer of chow mein noodles. This test
panel was immersed in a cobalt conversion coating solution for 30 minutes. The white
bar is a length of 1 micron.
[0017] FIG. 6 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 5.
The photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of
oxide coating 150. FIG. 6 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area
of FIG. 5. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
[0018] FIG. 7 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a side
view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 150 of the invention.
The aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 152. This
test panel was immersed in a coating bath for 30 minutes. To make the photomicrograph,
the test panel was bent and broken off to expose a cross section of oxide coating
150. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
[0019] FIG. 8 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 7
showing a side view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 150
of the invention. FIG. 8 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area of
FIG. 7. The aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral
152. The white bar is a length of 1 micron. Oxide coating 150 has a vertical thickness
of about 0.12-0.14 micron.
[0020] FIG. 9 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a cobalt
conversion coating 190 of the invention. The photomicrograph is a top view, from an
elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 190. The top of oxide coating
190 is porous and looks like a layer of chow mein noodles. This test panel was immersed
in a cobalt conversion coating solution for 50 minutes. The oblong object indicated
by reference numeral 192 is an impurity, believed to be a piece of oxidized material,
on top of oxide coating 190. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
[0021] FIG. 10 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 9.
The photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of
oxide coating 190. FIG. 10 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area
of FIG. 9. The roundish object indicated by reference numeral 192a is an unidentified
impurity on top of oxide coating 190. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
[0022] FIG. 11 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a side
view of a fractured cross section of a cobalt conversion coating 190 of the invention.
The fractured cross section of the aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated
by reference numeral 194. This test panel was immersed in a coating bath for 50 minutes.
To make the photomicrograph, the test panel was bent and broken off to expose a cross
section of oxide coating 190. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
[0023] FIG. 12 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 11
showing a side view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 190
of the invention. FIG. 12 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area
of FIG. 11. The aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral
194. The white bar is a length of 1 micron. Oxide coating 190 has a vertical thickness
of about 0.12-0.14 micron.
[0024] FIG. 13 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of another test panel showing
a cobalt conversion coating 230 of the invention. The photomicrograph is a top view,
from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of oxide coating 230. The top of oxide
coating 230 is porous and looks like a layer of chow mein noodles. This test panel
was immersed in a cobalt conversion coating solution for 60 minutes. The white bar
is a length of 1 micron.
[0025] FIG. 14 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 13.
The photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of
oxide coating 230. FIG. 14 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area
of FIG. 13. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
[0026] FIG. 15 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a side
view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 230 of the invention.
The aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 232. This
test panel was immersed in the coating bath for 60 minutes. To make the photomicrograph,
the test panel was bent and broken off to expose a cross section of oxide coating
230. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
[0027] FIG. 16 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 15
showing a side view of a fractured cross section of cobalt conversion coating 230
of the invention. FIG. 16 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area
of FIG. 15. The white bar is a length of 1 micron. Oxide coating 150 has a vertical
thickness of about 0.12-0.14 micron.
[0028] FIG. 17 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of another test panel showing
a sealed cobalt conversion coating 270 of the invention. The photomicrograph is a
top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of sealed oxide coating 270.
This test panel was immersed in a sealing solution for 20 minutes. Sealed oxide coating
270 is not as porous as an unsealed oxide coating, the pores of the oxide coating
being partially filled by hydration as a result of immersion in a sealing solution.
The partial sealing of the oxide coating gives reduced paint adhesion results, but
excellent corrosion resistance performance. The whitish areas identified by reference
numeral 274 are believed to be impurities from the sealing solution. The white bar
is a length of 1 micron.
[0029] FIG. 18 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 17.
The photomicrograph is a top view, from an elevated angle, of the upper surface of
sealed oxide coating 270. FIG. 18 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small
area of FIG. 17. Sealed oxide coating 270 is not as porous as an unsealed oxide coating,
the pores of the oxide coating being partially filled by hydration as a result of
immersion in a sealing solution. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
[0030] FIG. 19 is a photomicrograph at X10,000 magnification of a test panel showing a side
view of a fractured cross section of sealed cobalt conversion coating 270 of the invention.
The aluminum substrate of the test panel is indicated by reference numeral 272. This
test panel was immersed in the sealing bath for 20 minutes. To make the photomicrograph,
the test panel was bent and broken off to expose a cross section of oxide coating
270. The white bar is a length of 1 micron.
[0031] FIG. 20 is a photomicrograph at X50,000 magnification of the test panel of FIG. 19
showing a side view of a fractured cross section of sealed cobalt conversion coating
270 of the invention. FIG. 20 is a close-up, at higher magnification, of a small area
of FIG. 19. The white bar is a length of 1 micron. Sealed oxide coating 270 has a
vertical thickness of about 0.12-0.14 micron.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0032] I have invented two classes of cobalt conversion coatings. The first class is a cobalt
conversion coating consisting of an oxide structure in unsealed condition and suitable
for use in service where paint adhesion is especially important. The second class
is a cobalt conversion coating consisting of an oxide structure in sealed condition
and suitable for use in service where bare metal corrosion resistance performance
is desired.
[0033] A considerable amount of empirical research was conducted in order to arrive at the
present invention. A variety of multivalent compounds was investigated, used either
by themselves or in combination with alkalies, acids, or fluorides. Among these compounds
were vanadates, molybdates, cerates, ferrates and a variety of borates. While film
deposition of compounds containing these elements on aluminum alloy substrates has
been achieved, none afforded any appreciable corrosion protection nor paint adhesion.
[0034] A significant increase in corrosion protection was observed, however, when aluminum
substrates were immersed in aqueous solutions of simple cobalt-II (Co²+) salts heated
to 180°F; This led to an investigation of a number of cobalt-II and cobalt-III (Co³+)
reactions, in particular as described in copending application Serial No. 07/525,800
filed May 17, 1990.
[0035] When 2-valent cobalt salts are dissolved into an aqueous solution of MeNO₂ (where
Me = Na, K, or Li) (alkali metal ions), in the presence of an oxidizing agent, such
as H₂O₂, then 3-valent cobalt nitrite complexes are formed:
(1) 2 CoX₂ + 12 MeNO₂ + H₂O₂ → 2 Me₃[Co(NO₂)₆] + 4 Mex + 2 MeOH
where X₂ = (NO₃)₂, Cl₂, (CH₃COO)₂ (acetate), S0₄, Br₂, (CN)₂, (SCN)₂, CO₃. From an
environmental standpoint, the cyanide and thiocyanate salts are not preferred. In
particular, the following bath chemistries were prepared and tested:
(2) 2 Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O + 12 NaNO₂ + H₂O₂ → 2 Na₃[Co(NO₂)₆] + 4 NaNO₃ + 2 NaOH
(3) 2 Co(N0₃)₂·6H₂O + 12 KNO₂ + H₂O₂ → 2 K₃[Co(NO₂)₆] + 4 KNO₃ + 2 KOH
(4) 2 Co(CH₃COO)₂·4H₂O + 12 NaNO₂ + H₂O₂ → 2 Na₃[Co(NO₂)₆] + 4 CH₃COONa
+ 2 NaOH
(5) 2 CoCl₂·6H₂O + 12 NaNO₂ + H₂O₂ → 2 Na₃[Co(NO₂)₆] + 4 NaCl + 2 NaOH
[0036] These 3-valent cobalt nitrite complexes were found to produce brightly iridescent
oxide coatings on aluminum substrates.
[0037] The chemistry described in copending application Serial Number 07/525,800 involved
the chemistry of an aqueous solution containing a cobalt-II salt such as CoX₂ (where
X₂ = Cl₂, Br₂, (NO₃)₂, (CN)₂, (SCN)₂, PO₄, SO₄, (CH₃COO)₂, CO₃) and the corresponding
ammonium salt NH₄X in the presence of ammonium hydroxide (ammonia) to form a cobalt-III
hexammine coordination complex, for example:

[0038] It should be noted that the above cobalt hexammine chemistry in equation (6) involves
a cobalt coordination complex where the portion of the complex which includes the
ligand (the bracketed portion in equation (6)) is positively charged, i.e.,
(7) [Co(NH₃)₆]³⁺
[0039] In the cobalt hexanitrite chemistry subsequently developed and described herein,
cobalt coordination complexes are formed where the portion of the complex which includes
the ligand (the bracketed portion in equations (1)-(5)) is negatively charged, i.e.,
(8) [Co(NO₂)₆]³⁻
and the complete complex is
(9) Me₃[Co(NO₂)₆]
where Me corresponds to Na, K, or Li (alkali metal ions).
[0040] This cobalt nitrite complex bath chemistry (equation (1)) has a distinct advantage
over the previously described cobalt hexammine complex chemistry (equation (6)) in
that pH control of the cobalt hexanitrite complex bath is not required.
[0041] It was discovered that when aluminum alloy substrates (such as alloy 2024-T3) are
immersed in an aqueous solution containing the cobalt-III nitrite complexes above,
bright iridescent coatings are formed on the aluminum alloy, which give excellent
corrosion resistance properties.
[0042] It is surprising that cobalt-III hexanitrite complexes are capable of forming oxide
structures on aluminum substrates. The oxidizing ability of the cobalt-III hexanitrite
complex is believed to be responsible for the formation of the observed oxide films
(which I refer to as "cobalt conversion coatings") on aluminum substrates. The formation
of oxide structures has been confirmed by instrumental analysis (Auger analysis and
electron microscopy) of the coating. The photomicrographs in FIGS. 1-20 illustrate
the appearance of the cobalt conversion coating of the invention.
[0043] Initial bath formulations were made up using Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O and NaNO₂. Reaction quantities
were used in accordance with stoichiometric amounts as shown in equation (2) above.
[0044] It became apparent during experimentation with this initial formulation that a number
of parameters are important from the standpoint of bath chemistry and uniform formation
of oxide coating films. These parameters are: chemical reactant selection; chemical
reactant concentrations; bath makeup sequence; temperature; and immersion time. It
should be noted that pH control is not a factor.
Chemical Reactant Selection
[0045] Regarding reactant selection, a wide variety of cobalt salts and metal nitrite salts
are operable for cobalt complexing. Among the cobalt-II salts which are operable in
water solution are: cobalt nitrate, Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O; cobalt chloride, CoCl₂·6H₂O; cobaltous
sulfate, CoSO₄; cobaltous acetate, Co(CH₃COO)₂·4H₂O; and cobaltous basic carbonate,
2CoCO₃·Co(OH)₂·H₂O. Each of the foregoing cobalt-II salts may be reacted with a nitrite
salt such as NaNO₂, KNO₂, or LiNO₂.
[0046] Furthermore, other cobalt-II salts may be used if they possess a minimum solubility
in water or in a water solution containing a metal nitrite salt. The minimum solubility
needed is 25 grams per 100 ml of water at 20°C (68°F) or 25 grams per 100 ml of water
solution containing a metal nitrite salt at 20°C (68°F).
[0047] It may also be noted that for aluminum and aluminum alloys the preferred reactants
are Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O and NaNO₂, since cobalt nitrite complexes formed with potassium
or lithium nitrite are of limited solubility and will eventually drop out of an aqueous
solution.
[0048] A preferred chemical additive is an oxidizer, preferably hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂.
The function of the oxidizer is to oxidize the cobalt-II ions in solution to cobalt-III
ions. Care must be taken that an excess amount of chemical oxidizer is not used because
an excess would have the undesired effect of oxidizing the nitrite ions in solution
to nitrate ions. The stream of air flowing into the tank functions as an oxidizer,
so the presence of hydrogen peroxide is not essential for operability. The hydrogen
peroxide increases the rate of oxidation of the cobalt-II ions in solution to cobalt-III
ions and therefore is useful for commercial practice of the invention in that the
solution becomes operational in a shorter period of time.
[0049] Furthermore, it may also be noted that a reaction accelerator chemical such as sodium
bromide (NaBr) or sodium iodide (NaI) may be added to the solution. (NaI is preferred.)
The reaction accelerator was found to have the effect of accelerating the formation
of the oxide conversion coatings on aluminum alloy substrates as compared to solutions
of cobalt-III hexanitrite complexes which did not contain this additive. The presence
of the accelerator is not essential for operability. The accelerator increases the
rate of formation of the oxide conversion coatings on aluminum alloys and therefore
is useful for commercial practice of the invention.
[0050] Thus the preferred chemical reactants and additives are:
Cobalt nitrate |
Co(N0₃)₂·6H₂O |
Sodium nitrite |
NaNO₂ |
Hydrogen peroxide (oxidizer) |
H₂O₂ |
Sodium iodide (accelerator) |
NaI |
Chemical Reactant Concentration, pH, Temperature, And Immersion Time
[0051] With respect to chemical reactant concentrations, the concentration of dissolved
cobalt-II salt used may be from about 0.1 moles per gallon of final solution up to
the saturation limit of the cobalt-II salt employed. The concentration of dissolved
metal nitrite salt may be from about 0.6 to 12 moles per gallon of final solution.
The concentration of oxidizer, such as hydrogen peroxide, may be from complete omission
up to about 0.5 moles per gallon of final solution. As stated above, an excess amount
of hydrogen peroxide has undesired effects. The concentration of accelerator salt,
such as NaI, may be from complete omission up to the solubility limit of the accelerator
in the solution. The pH of the bath may be from about 7.0 to 7.2. The temperature
of the bath may be from about 68°F to 150°F; below 100°F coating formation is very
slow; above 150°F gradual decomposition of the cobalt-III hexanitrite complex occurs.
The immersion time may be from about 3 minutes to 60 minutes.
Preferred Bath Preparation Sequence
[0052]
1. A stainless steel tank fitted with air agitation plumbing and heating coils is
filled to 3/4 with deionized water at a temperature of 68°F to 90°F. Air agitation
is commenced to a gentle bubble. (The tank may be equipped with a filter unit to remove
any solid impurities (dust, aluminum silt, etc.) during processing.)
2. A quantity of nitrite salt (NaN0₂ is preferred) is added and completely dissolved.
Stainless steel baskets may be used to hold the nitrite salt granules suspended in
the water while dissolving. The preferred concentration of nitrite salt is about 3.6
moles per gallon of final solution. The amount used is based on the mole ratio of
nitrite salt to cobalt salt which will produce an oxide coating exhibiting high paint
adhesion properties. The preferred molar ratio of nitrite salt to cobalt salt is about
12 to 1.
3. A quantity of sodium iodide (the conversion coating reaction accelerator) may now
be added. The concentration of this additive may be from no addition up to the solubility
limit, however the preferred quantity is 80-100 gm per gallon of final solution.
4. The cobalt-II salt is now added and dissolved. The preferred concentration is about
0.3 moles per gallon of final solution. This concentration of the cobalt salt, when
added to a solution already containing 3.6 moles per gallon of nitrite salt, achieves
the preferred molar ratio of nitrite salt to cobalt salt of 12 to 1. Moderate air
agitation is maintained.
5. A quantity of hydrogen peroxide H₂O₂ is now slowly added. The preferred amount
is 0.3 to 0.5 moles of H₂O₂ (30 to 50 ml of H₂O₂ (30 volume %)) per gallon of final
solution. The tank is filled to the final volume with deionized water. Air agitation
of this solution is maintained for 12-16 hours at a temperature of 68-90°F and then
the solution is heated to preferably 120 ± 5°F. The use of H₂O₂ is preferred for fast
and consistent cobalt-III hexanitrite complex formation. The solution is now ready
for operation.
6. Optionally, a second stainless steel tank (to be used for a coating seal step)
is prepared with air agitation plumbing and heating coils and is filled 3/4 with deionized
water. This post-cobalt conversion coating step serves as an oxide coating sealer
to promote corrosion resistance performance. The tank is heated to 180 ± 5°F with
air agitation.
7. A quantity of ammonium nitrate, NH₄NO₃, is added to the seal tank and dissolved.
The preferred amount is 114 gm (1.42 moles) per gallon of final solution. Stir as
necessary to dissolve.
8. A quantity of nickel sulfate, NiSO₄·6H₂O, and a quantity of manganese acetate,
Mn(CH₃COO)₂·4H₂O, are added to the seal tank and dissolved. The preferred amount of
nickel sulfate is 152 gm (0.58 moles) per gallon of final solution. The preferred
amount of manganese acetate is 76 gm (0.31 moles) per gallon of final solution. Stir
as necessary to dissolve.
9. The seal tank is then filled to final volume with deionized water. No further air
agitation is needed.
Preferred Overall Processing Sequences
[0053] The preferred overall processing sequences may be summarized as follows:

General Notes With Respect To The Above Process Flow Charts
[0054] The cobalt conversion coating should be applied after all trimming and fabrication
have been completed. Parts, where solution entrapment is possible, should not be subjected
to immersion alkaline cleaning or immersion deoxidizing; manual cleaning and manual
deoxidizing procedures should be used to obtain water break-free surfaces before applying
cobalt conversion treatment. A water break-free surface is a surface which maintains
a continuous water film for a period of at least 30 seconds after having been sprayed
or immersion rinsed in clean water at a temperature below 100°F.
[0055] Thorough rinsing and draining throughout processing is necessary as each solution
should be completely removed to avoid interference with the performance of the next
solution in the sequence. Parts should be processed from one step to the next without
delay and without allowing the parts to dry. When it is necessary to handle wet parts,
wear clean latex rubber gloves. After conversion coating, handle dry parts only with
clean fabric gloves. For processing systems which require part clamping, the number
and size of contact points should be kept to a minimum as necessary for adequate mechanical
support.
Precleaning
[0056] Vapor degrease may be performed in accordance with Boeing Process Specification BAC
5408, emulsion clean in accordance with Boeing Process Specification BAC 5763, or
solvent clean in accordance with Boeing Process Specification BAC 5750 if parts are
greasy or oily. Parts with open faying surfaces or spot-welded joints where solution
entrapment is possible should be immersed in cold water (or in hot and cold water)
for 2 minutes after precleaning.
Masking And Racking
[0057] Areas which do not require cobalt conversion coatings should be masked with maskants.
Dissimilar metal inserts (except chromium, nickel or cobalt alloy or plating, CRES,
or titanium) and non-aluminum coated plasma flame sprayed area should be masked off.
Alkaline Cleaning
[0058] Alkaline clean and rinse may be performed in accordance with Boeing Process Specification
BAC 5744 or Boeing Process Specification BAC 5749 except for parts with open faying
surfaces or spot welded joints, in which case, rinsing should be for at least 10 minutes
using agitation with multiple immersions (a minimum of four times) followed by manual
spray rinsing as required to prevent solution entrapment.
Deoxidizing
[0059] Deoxidize and rinse may be performed in accordance with Boeing Process Specification
BAC 5765 except for parts where solution entrapment is possible, which parts may be
rinsed using the method described above under "Alkaline Cleaning". Castings may be
deoxidized by either of the following methods:
a. Deoxidize in accordance with Boeing Process Specification BAC 5765, Solution 37,
38 or 39.
b. Dry abrasive blast castings in accordance with Boeing Process Specification BAC
5748, Type II, Class 1 and rinse.
Examples
[0060] Examples of specific solution formulations within the scope of the invention are
as follows:
Example 1. |
Component |
Make-Up Per Gallon Of Final Solution |
Control Limits |
Cobalt(ous) nitrate, Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂0 (hexahydrate) |
85 gm (about 0.29 mole) |
75-95 gm/gal |
Sodium nitrite, NaNO₂ |
242 gm (about 3.51 moles) |
227-246 gm/gal |
Sodium Iodide, NaI |
90 gm (about 0.60 moles) |
83-99 gm/gal |
Hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂ (30 vol. %) |
30-50 ml (about 0.3-0.5 moles of H₂0₂) |
|
Water |
balance |
|
Temperature |
|
120 ± 5° F |
pH |
|
7.0 - 7.2 |
[0061] The formulation of Example 1, with a molar ratio of nitrite salt to cobalt salt of
about 12 to 1, is useful for producing oxide coatings exhibiting high paint adhesion
in unsealed condition.
Example 2. |
Component |
Make-Up Per Gallon Of Final Solution |
Control Limits |
Cobalt(ous) chloride, CoCl₂·6H₂0 (hexahydrate) |
69 gm (about 0.29 mole) |
|
Sodium nitrite, NaN0₂ |
242 gm (about 3.51 moles) |
|
Sodium iodide, NaI |
90 gm (about 0.60 moles) |
|
Hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂ (30 vol. %) |
30-50 ml (about 0.3-0.5 moles of H₂O₂) |
|
Water |
balance |
|
Temperature |
|
120-150°F |
pH |
|
7.0 - 7.2 |
[0062] The formulation of Example 2, also having a molar ratio of nitrite salt to cobalt
salt of about 12 to 1, is useful for producing oxide coatings possessing high paint
adhesion properties in unsealed condition.
Example 3. |
Component |
Make-Up Per Gallon Of Final Solution |
Control Limits |
Cobalt acetate, Co(CH₃COO)₂·4H₂0 |
73 gm (about 0.29 moles) |
|
Sodium nitrite, NaNO₂ |
242 gm (about 3.51 moles) |
|
Sodium iodide, NaI (accelerator) |
90 gm (about 0.60 moles) |
|
Hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂ (30 vol. %) |
30-50 ml (about 0.3-0.5 moles of H₂O₂) |
|
Water |
balance |
|
Temperature |
|
120-150°F |
pH |
|
7.0 - 7.2 |
[0063] It should be noted that in all of the above examples hydrogen peroxide H₂O₂ (30 vol.
%) is employed to convert the 2-valent cobalt salt into the 3-valent cobalt hexanitrite
complex. While air bubbling (aeration) of the solution alone will convert a sufficient
quantity of cobalt-II salt to cobalt-III complex, the procedure will be time consuming
and complete conversion may never be obtained.
[0064] In principle, any 2-valent soluble cobalt salt may be reacted with any soluble nitrite
salt to form 3-valent cobalt hexanitrite complexes. Furthermore, this type of complexing,
as shown in formula (8) above, is not restricted to nitrites only. For research purposes,
cyanide salts were used (i.e., sodium cyanide, NaCN) to form hexacyano complexes of
the type shown below
(10) Me₃[Co(CN)₆
]
and have yielded satisfactory conversion coatings on aluminum alloys. However, cyanide
complexes will not be used because of environmental considerations.
[0065] As mentioned above, in order to produce cobalt conversion coatings with maximum corrosion
resistance performance (168 hrs. salt spray corrosion resistance, when tested in accordance
with ASTM B117) it is necessary to subject the cobalt conversion coating to a sealing
step. For this purpose, a number of sealing solutions were found to be useful, however,
the sealing solution formulation below is preferred.
Example 4. |
Component |
Make-Up Per Gallon Of Final Solution |
Control Limits |
Nickel sulfate, NiS0₄·6H₂0 (hexahydrate) |
152 gm (about 0.58 moles) |
144-159 gm |
Ammonium nitrate, NH₄NO₃ |
114 gm (about 1.42 moles) |
105-121 gm |
Manganese acetate, Mn(CH₃COO)₂·4H₂O |
76 gm (about 0.31 moles) |
68-84 gm |
Operating temperature |
|
185 ± 5° F |
[0066] The immersion time in the sealing solution may be about 10-30 minutes, with 15 minutes
being preferred. The sealing solution is believed to seal the cobalt conversion coating
by a hydration mechanism. FIGS. 17-20, particularly FIG. 18, show a sealed cobalt
conversion coating 270. Other sealing solutions which may be employed are as follows:
- Solution 1:
- Boric acid, H₃BO₃, 50 gm/gal. Cobalt sulfate, CoSO₄·7H20, 25 gm/gal. Ammonium acetate,
CH₃COONH₄, 25 gm/gal.
- Solution 2:
- Boric acid, H₃BO₃, 30 gm/gal. Sodium borate, Na₂B₄O₇, 30 gm/gal. Sodium nitrite, NaNO₂,
30 gm/gal. Ammonium vanadate, NH₄VO₃, 5 gm/gal.
- Solution 3:
- Cobalt sulfate, CoSO₄·7H₂O, 25 gm/gal. Ammonium vanadate, NH₄VO₃, 5 gm/gal. Boric
acid, H₃BO₃, 50 gm/gal.
[0067] Solutions 1-3 are not preferred because they lose their effectiveness over a period
of time, whereas the solution in Example 4 has a long life.
Cobalt Conversion Coating: Solution Temperature And Immersion Time
[0068] The two process parameters of solution temperature and immersion time have been found
to be important as relating to cobalt conversion coating performance.
[0069] A continuous operating temperature range of the cobalt conversion tank of 120-140°F
yields optimum results with respect to coating performance on aluminum alloy substrates.
Optimum paint adhesion is obtained when the tank is operated at or near 120°F, while
optimum corrosion resistance performance is given at 140°F in combination with the
subsequent seal process. Immersion times in the cobalt conversion tank have an effect
on the oxide coating thickness as measured by the coating weight (in unsealed condition)
ranging from 40 to 60 mg/ft². An optimum immersion time for maximum paint adhesion
is 15 minutes and for maximum corrosion resistance performance is 30 minutes.
Corrosion Resistance
[0070] Salt spray corrosion resistance of cobalt conversion coatings produced by the above
processes varies over a wide range, depending on reactant selection, immersion times,
and bath operating temperatures. Preferred results are obtained when the formulation
of Example 1 is utilized at immersion times of 30 minutes. In this way, sealed oxide
coatings have been produced with 168 hrs. of salt spray corrosion resistance when
sealed with the seal solution as described herein and tested in accordance with ASTM
B117.
Paint Adhesion
[0071] Paint adhesion tests were conducted using aircraft paints qualified to Boeing Material
Specification BMS 10-11 (a highly crosslinked epoxy primer) and BMS 10-60 (a highly
crosslinked urethane topcoat). General trends observed with the present cobalt conversion
coatings are consistent with conventional chromic acid conversion coatings, i.e.,
corrosion resistance and paint adhesion performance properties have an inverse relationship.
In general, where corrosion resistance is at a maximum, paint adhesion is at a minimum,
and vice versa.
[0072] However, the optional post-conversion step consisting of immersion into a heated
solution (at 185 ± 5°F) of NiS0₄/NH₄NO₃/Mn-acetate minimizes this problem by maintaining
sufficient paint adhesion values while maintaining high corrosion resistance properties.
Oxide Coating Analyses
[0073] ESCA surface analysis, using a Perkin-Elmer Model 550 surface analyzer, and Auger
oxide profiles, using the same machine (in a different operating mode), have been
performed in order to characterize the cobalt conversion coatings of the invention.
(ESCA = electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (also known as XPS or X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy).)
[0074] These analyses show that the cobalt conversion coating consists of a mixture of oxides,
namely, aluminum oxide, Al₂O₃, as the largest volume percent, and cobalt oxides, CoO,
Co₃O₄, and Co₂O₃. The term "largest volume percent" means that the volume of this
oxide exceeds the volume of any other oxide which is present, but the term "largest
volume percent" does not necessarily imply that the volume of this oxide is more than
50 volume percent.
[0075] The data further shows that in the lower portion of the oxide coating (that is, next
to the aluminum substrate), the largest volume percent is Al₂O₃. The middle portion
of the oxide coating is a mixture of CoO, Co₃O₄, Co₂O₃, and Al₂O₃. And the data shows
that in the top portion of the oxide coating, the largest volume percent is a mixture
of Co₃O₄ and Co₂O₃.
[0076] Additional characterization of the cobalt conversion coatings of the invention may
be found above in the "Brief Description Of The Drawings", in FIGS. 1-20, and in the
descriptions of FIGS. 1-20. FIGS. 1-4 show a cobalt conversion coating 130 (in the
unsealed condition) formed by a 20 minute immersion in a typical cobalt conversion
coating solution. FIGS. 5-8 show a cobalt conversion coating 150 (in the unsealed
condition) formed by a 30 minute immersion in a typical cobalt conversion coating
solution. FIGS. 9-12 show a cobalt conversion coating 190 (in the unsealed condition)
formed by a 50 minute immersion in a typical cobalt conversion coating solution. FIGS.
13-16 show a cobalt conversion coating 230 (in the unsealed condition) formed by a
60 minute immersion in a typical cobalt conversion coating solution. Comparing FIGS.
1-4, FIGS. 5-8, FIGS. 9-12, and FIGS. 13-16, there does not appear to be any significant
structural difference between coating 130, coating 150, coating 190, and coating 230.
This suggests that at any given bath operating temperature, the oxide coating becomes
self limiting. The top surface of the cobalt conversion coating, as shown in FIGS.
1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, and 14 is porous and bears a resemblance to chow mein noodles.
This oxide structure provides appreciable surface area and porosity for good paint
adhesion.
[0077] FIGS. 17-20 show sealed cobalt conversion coating 270. The cobalt conversion coating
was formed on the substrate and then the coating was partially sealed by immersion
in a sealing solution. In particular, FIG. 18 shows the partially sealed structure
of coating 270. Sealed oxide coating 270 is not as porous as an unsealed oxide coating,
the pores of the oxide coating being partially filled by hydration as a result of
immersion in a sealing solution. The partial sealing of the oxide coating gives reduced
paint adhesion results, but excellent corrosion resistance performance.
Other Methods Of Application
[0078] The above examples illustrate producing cobalt conversion coatings by immersion application.
The same principles apply to producing the conversion coating by manual application
and by spray application.
[0079] The patents, specifications, and other publications referenced above are incorporated
herein by reference.
[0080] As will be apparent to those skilled in the art to which the invention is addressed,
the present invention may be embodied in forms other than those specifically disclosed
above, without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics of the invention.
The particular embodiments of the invention described above and the particular details
of the processes described are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative
and not restrictive. The scope of the present invention is as set forth in the appended
claims rather than being limited to the examples set forth in the foregoing description.
Any and all equivalents are intended to be embraced by the claims.
1. A process for forming a cobalt conversion coating on a metal substrate, said process
comprising the steps of:
(a) providing a cobalt conversion solution comprising an aqueous solution of a soluble
cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex, the concentration of said cobalt-III hexacoordinated
complex being from about 0.1 mole per gallon of solution to the saturation limit of
said cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex; and
(b) contacting said metal substrate with said solution for a sufficient amount of
time, whereby said cobalt conversion coating is formed.
2. The process of claim 1, wherein said soluble cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex is
a soluble cobalt-III hexanitrite complex.
3. The process of claim 2, wherein said cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex is present
in the form of Me₃[Co(NO₂)₆] wherein Me is one or more selected from the group comprising
Na, K, and Li.
4. The process of claims 1-3, wherein said cobalt conversion solution has a pH of about
7.0 to 7.2.
5. The process of claims 1-4, wherein said cobalt conversion solution has a temperature
of about 20°C (68°F) to 66°C (150°F).
6. The process of claims 1-5, wherein said substrate is contacted with said cobalt conversion
solution for a time of about 3 minutes to 60 minutes.
7. The process of claims 1-6, wherein said substrate is aluminum or aluminum alloy.
8. The process of claims 1-7, wherein said cobalt conversion solution comprises an aqueous
solution prepared by reacting a cobalt-II salt with a metal nitrite salt, wherein
the concentration of said cobalt-II salt is from about 0.1 moles per gallon of final
solution to the saturation limit of the cobalt-II salt employed and the concentration
of said metal nitrite salt is from about 0.6 to 12 moles per gallon of final solution.
9. The process of claim 8, wherein said cobalt-II salt is a cobalt-II salt which has
a minimum solubility of about 25 grams per 100 ml of water at 20°C (68°F) or a minimum
solubility of about 25 grams per 100 ml of water solution containing a metal nitrite
salt at 20°C (68°F).
10. The process of claim 8 or 9, wherein said cobalt-II salt is CoX₂, wherein X₂ is one
or more selected from the group comprising (NO₃)₂, Cl₂, (CH₃COO)₂ (acetate), SO₄,
Br₂, (CH)₂, (SCN)₂, or CO₃.
11. The process of claims 8-10, wherein said metal nitrite salt is MeNO₂ wherein Me is
one or more selected from the group comprising Na, K or Li.
12. The process of claims 8-11, wherein an oxidizer is added to said cobalt conversion
solution to oxidize the cobalt-II ions in solution to cobalt-III ions.
13. The process of claim 12, wherein said oxidizer is hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂.
14. The process of claim 13, wherein hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂, in the amount of 0.3 to
0.5 moles per gallon of final solution is added to said cobalt conversion solution.
15. The process of claims 8-14, wherein a reaction accelerator is added to said cobalt
conversion solution to accelerate the formation of said cobalt conversion coating
on said substrate.
16. The process of claim 15, wherein said reaction accelerator is selected from the group
comprising sodium iodide, NaI, and sodium bromide, NaBr.
17. The process of claim 16, wherein sodium iodide, NaI, in the amount of 83 to 99 grams
per gallon of final solution is added to said cobalt conversion solution.
18. The process of claims 8-17, wherein said cobalt conversion solution is prepared by
a bath makeup sequence comprising:
(a) adding and dissolving said metal nitrite salt;
(b) then adding and dissolving a reaction accelerator;
(c) then adding and dissolving said cobalt-II salt; and
(d) then adding an oxidizer to the solution.
19. The process of claims 8-18, wherein said solution is prepared by reacting said cobalt-II
salt with said metal nitrite salt, wherein the molar ratio of said metal nitrite salt
to cobalt salt is about 6 to 1 to 14 to 1.
20. The process of claims 8-19, comprising the additional step of contacting said coated
substrate with an aqueous sealing solution comprising nickel sulfate, NiSO₄.6H₂O,
ammonium nitrate, NH₄NO₃, and manganese acetate, Mn(CH₃COO)₂.4H₂O.
21. The process of claims 1-20, wherein a cobalt conversion solution is provided comprising
an aqueous solution prepared by reacting cobalt nitrate, Co(NO₃)₂.6H₂O, with sodium
nitrite, NaNO₂, wherein the concentration of said cobalt nitrate is from about 75
to 95 grams per gallon of final solution and the concentration of said sodium nitrite
is from about 227 to 246 grams per gallon of final solution.
22. The process of claim 21, wherein said cobalt conversion solution is prepared by a
batch makeup sequence comprising:
(a) adding and dissolving said sodium nitrite;
(b) then adding and dissolving sodium iodide, NaI;
(c) the adding and dissolving said cobalt nitrate; and
(d) then adding said hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂, to the solution.
23. The process of claim 21 or 22, wherein said cobalt conversion solution has a temperature
of about 48 ± 5°C (120 ± 5°F).
24. The process of claims 21-23, wherein said substrate is contacted with said cobalt
conversion solution for a time of about 15 minutes to 30 minutes.
25. A chemical conversion coating solution for producing a cobalt conversion coating on
a metal substrate, said solution comprising an aqueous solution of a soluble cobalt-III
hexacoordinated complex, the concentration of said cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex
being from about 0.1 mole per gallon of solution to the saturation limit of said cobalt-III
hexacoordinated complex.
26. The solution of claim 25, wherein said soluble cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex
is a soluble cobalt-III hexanitrite complex.
27. The solution of claim 26, wherein said cobalt-III hexacoordinated complex is present
in the form of Me₃[Co(No₂)₆] wherein Me is one or more selected from the group consisting
of Na, K, and Li.
28. The solution of claim 26 or 27, wherein said solution is prepared by reacting a cobalt-II
salt with a metal nitrite salt, wherein the concentration of said cobalt-II salt is
from about 0.1 moles per gallon of final solution to the saturation limit of the cobalt-II
salt employed and the concentration of said metal nitrite salt is from about 0.6 to
12 moles per gallon of final solution.
29. The solution of claim 28, wherein said cobalt-II salt is a cobalt-II salt which has
a minimum solubility of about 25 grams per 100 ml of water at 20°C (68°F) or a minimum
solubility of about 25 grams per 100 ml of water solution containing a metal nitrite
salt at 20°C (68°F).
30. The solution of claim 28 or 29, wherein said cobalt-II salt is CoX₂ wherein X₂ is
one or more selected from the group comprising (NO₃)₂, Cl₂, (CH₃COO)₂ (acetate), SO₄,
Br₂, (CN)₂, (SCN)₂, or CO₃.
31. The solution of claims 28-30, wherein said metal nitrite salt is MeNO₂ wherein Me
is one or more selected from the group comprising Na, K, and Li.
32. The solution of claims 25-31, wherein an oxidizer is added to said solution to oxidize
the cobalt-II ions to cobalt-III ions.
33. The solution of claim 32, wherein said oxidizer is hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂.
34. The solution of claims 25-33, wherein a reaction accelerator is added to said cobalt
conversion solution to accelerate the formation of said cobalt conversion coating
on said substrate.
35. The solution of claim 34, wherein said reaction accelerator is selected form the group
consisting of sodium iodide, NaI, or sodium bromide, NaBr.
36. The solution of claims 32-35, wherein said cobalt conversion solution is prepared
by a bath makeup sequence comprising the steps of:
(a) adding and dissolving said metal nitrite salt;
(b) then adding and dissolving said reaction accelerator;
(c) then adding and dissolving said cobalt-II salt; and
(d) then adding said oxidizer to the solution.
37. The solution of claims 28-36, wherein said solution is prepared by reacting said cobalt-II
salt with said metal nitrite salt, wherein the molar ratio of nitrite salt to cobalt
salt is about 6 to 1 to 14 to 1.
38. The solution of claims 25-37, wherein said solution has a pH of about 7.0 to 7.2.
39. The solution of claims 25-38, wherein said solution has a temperature of about 20°C
(68°F) to 66°C (150°F).
40. The solution of claims 25-39, wherein said substrate is aluminum or aluminum alloy.
41. The solution of claims 28-40, wherein said cobalt-III hexanitrite complex is sodium
cobalt-III hexanitrite complex, said cobalt-II salt is cobalt-II nitrate, said metal
nitrite salt is sodium nitrite, and said solution has a temperature of about 48 ±
5°C (120 ± 5°F).
42. A coated article obtained in a process of claims 1-24 or by using the solution of
claim 25-41.
43. A coated article exhibiting corrosion resistance and paint adhesion properties, said
article comprising:
(a) a metal substrate; and
(b) a cobalt conversion coating formed on said substrate, said cobalt conversion coating
comprising aluminum oxide Al₂O₃ as the largest volume percent, and one or more cobalt
oxides from the group consisting of CoO, Co₃O₄, and Co₂O₃.
44. The article of claim 42 or 43, wherein
(a) in the portion of said cobalt conversion coating adjacent said substrate, the
largest volume percent of said coating consists essentially of Al₂O₃;
(b) in the top portion of said cobalt conversion coating, the largest volume percent
of said coating consists essentially of a mixture of Co₃O₄ and Co₂O₃; and
(c) in the portion of said cobalt conversion coating therebetween, said coating consists
essentially of a mixture of CoO, Co₃O₄, Co₂O₃, and Al₂O₃.
45. The article of claims 42-44, wherein said cobalt conversion coating has a thickness
of about 0.12 to 0.14 micron.
46. The article of claims 42-43, wherein the top of said cobalt conversion coating is
porous and has the appearance of chow mein noodles.
47. The article of claims 42-46, wherein said cobalt conversion coating is sealed.
48. The article of claims 42-47 exhibiting corrosion resistance and paint adhesion properties,
said substrate being aluminum or aluminum alloy.