| (19) |
 |
|
(11) |
EP 0 492 738 B1 |
| (12) |
EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION |
| (45) |
Mention of the grant of the patent: |
|
30.08.1995 Bulletin 1995/35 |
| (22) |
Date of filing: 20.12.1991 |
|
| (51) |
International Patent Classification (IPC)6: B07B 13/04 |
|
| (54) |
A process for sorting bulbous and tuberous produce according to size, in particular
suitable for potatoes
Verfahren zum Sortieren nach Grösse von Zwiebel- und Knollengewächsen, insbesondere
geeignet für Kartoffeln
Procédé pour classer des plantes bulbeuses et des plantes tubéreuses en fonction de
leur taille, en particulier pour des pommes de terre
|
| (84) |
Designated Contracting States: |
|
AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE |
| (30) |
Priority: |
21.12.1990 NL 9002852
|
| (43) |
Date of publication of application: |
|
01.07.1992 Bulletin 1992/27 |
| (73) |
Proprietor: Zijlstra & Bolhuis B.V. |
|
NL-9645 LA Veendam (NL) |
|
| (72) |
Inventor: |
|
- Middel, Jan
NL-9468 HL Annen (NL)
|
| (74) |
Representative: Smulders, Theodorus A.H.J., Ir. et al |
|
Vereenigde Octrooibureaux
Nieuwe Parklaan 97 2587 BN 's-Gravenhage 2587 BN 's-Gravenhage (NL) |
| (56) |
References cited: :
FR-A- 941 031 US-A- 4 225 422
|
US-A- 3 438 491 US-A- 4 763 794
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European
patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to
the European patent
granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall
not be deemed to
have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent
Convention).
|
[0001] This invention relates to a process for sorting bulbous and tuberous produce according
to successive size classes, in particular suitable for sorting potatoes, wherein a
sorting operation is carried out in which procedure is sorted according to sizes falling
within at least two successive main classes.
[0002] Such a process is know from the US patent 4,763,794. According to this known process
the produce travels over a series of opening or riddles ranging from small to large.
The riddles are adjustable to handle various sizes of produce. The produce falls through
the riddles and is collected beneath them. This completes the operation of sorting
the produce in successive main classes.
[0003] In potato trade and processing industry potatoes are sorted into different size classes
using internationally applied square size. The square size of a potato can be defined
as the length of the side of the small square opening through which the potato can
pass. The potatoes are sorted by means of the riddles into a number of classes, e.g.,
a first class of potatoes having a square size below 35 mm, a next class of potatoes
having a square size ranging from 35 to 45 mm, etc. Although acceptable accuracy is
obtainable with such a sorting method, yet the number of potatoes that will find their
way to a wrong class cannot be disregarded. These are for the major part potatoes
having a square size near the boundary value of a class. When, e.g., potatoes are
sorted into three size classes of, e.g., 20-30 mm, 30-50 mm and 50-70 mm, there is
a great chance that a relatively large number of the produce that wrongly found its
way to the class of 50-70 mm will have a square size ranging from 46 to 50 mm. Similarly,
a relatively large number of produce having a square size ranging from 26 to 30 mm
will generally be present in the class of 30-50 mm.
[0004] Since in potato trade and processing industry a more and more accurate sorting into
a relatively large number of classes each comprising a relatively small size range
is required, there is a need for an improved sorting method. The object of this invention
is to meet the above need. For this purpose a process of the above type is characterized
according to the invention in that in a transitional range between the at least two
successive main classes at least one intermediate class is defined; that a first sorting
operation is carried out, in which produce is sorted according to sizes falling within
the remaining range of the at least two main classes and the at least one intermediate
class; that the produce selected as falling within the remaining range of the main
classes are passed to collections of produce belonging to those main classes; that
the produce falling within the at least one intermediate class (is subjected to a
second sorting operation, the produce falling into an intermediate class being separated
into a first group belonging to the one main class pertaining to the relevant intermediate
class and a second group belonging to the other main class pertaining to the relevant
intermediate class; and that the two groups are added to the collections belonging
to the main classes.
[0005] The French patent application 941031 describes a process wherein potatoes are firstly
sorted in at least two successive subclasses.and wherein the potatoes of at least
one subclass are sorted into two successive main classes falling within the at least
one subclass.
[0006] In the following the invention will be further described with reference to the accompanying
Figure, which schematically illustrates the principle of the process according to
the invention.
[0007] The Figure schematically shows, by way of example, three size classes, according
to which bulbous and tuberous produce such as potatoes, but also, e.g., onions wit
the stems cut off, apples etc. can be sorted. In this example the size classes I,
II and III correspond to, e.g., sizes determined according to the square size principle
of respectively 20 through 29 mm, 30 through 49 mm and 50 through 69 mm. As stated
before, the sizes of the major part of the produce classified during the sorting process
into a wrong class are just below the sizes belonging to the next class of larger
produce.
[0008] According to the invention intermediate classes are introduced for produce having
sizes that are near the boundary with the next class. The intermediate class may be
completely within one of the original classes, but may also overlap the boundary between
two original classes.
[0009] Thus, in the example shown, two intermediate classes IV and V are defined for produce
having sizes of from, e.g., 26 and 34 mm and 46 and 54 mm, respectively. By now sorting
not only according to the original main classes, but also according to the intermediate
classes, the major part of the produce wrongly sorted at the original sorting machine
will find its way to one of the intermediate classes. The other produce is directly
classified into the right collections, as schematically indicated by arrows 1, 2 and
3. According to the invention the produce that found its way to the intermediate classes
is subjected to a second sorting operation, as schematically indicated by blocks 4,
5. The second sorting operation need not be carried out similarly to the first sorting
operation. For the second sorting operation a more accurate sorting method can be
used advantageously. Although accurate sorting methods are generally also relatively
time-consuming, this need not be a drawback, because relatively little produce is
present in the intermediate classes.
[0010] For the second sorting operation the so-called channel sorting method could be used
as described in applicants' simultaneously filed Dutch patent application, according
to which method produce like potatoes can be sorted based on the square size by measuring
the height of the potato located in a V-shaped channel.
[0011] In the second sorting operation the produce present in the intermediate class is
accurately sorted into two groups, the separation between the two groups being formed
by the boundary between the orginal classes. Thus the sorting operation indicated
at 4 separates the produce into produce below 30 mm and produce above 29 mm, respectively.
The first group is passed to the collection 20/29 and the second to the collection
30/49, as schematically indicated by arrows 6, 7. Similarly, the produce is separated
at 5 into a first group below 50 mm and a second group above 49 mm, as indicated by
arrows 8, 9.
[0012] It has been found that when using a two-stage sorting method as described above a
sorting accuracy of 97 to 98% is obtainable.
1. A process for sorting bulbous and tuberous produce according to successive size classes,
in particular suitable for sorting potatoes, wherein a sorting operation is carried
out in which procedure is sorted according to sizes falling within at least two successive
main classes, the sorting operation being characterized in that in a transitional range between the at least two successive main classes
(20/29, 30/49, 50/69) at least one intermediate class (IV, V) is defined; that a first
sorting operation is carried out, in which produce is sorted according to sizes falling
within the remaining range (I, II, III) of the at least two main classes (20/29, 30/49,
50/69) and the at least one intermediate class (IV, V); that the produce selected
as falling within the remaining range (I, II, III) of the main classes are passed
(1,2,3) to collections of produce belonging to those main classes (20/29, 30/49, 50/69);
that the produce falling within the at least one intermediate class (I, II, III) is
subjected to a second sorting operation (4,5), the produce falling into an intermediate
class being separated into a first group (6,7,8,9) belonging to the one main class
(20/29, 30/49, 50/69) pertaining to the relevant intermediate class (IV, V) and a
second group (6,7,8,9) belonging to the other main class (20/29, 30/49, 50/69) pertaining
to the relevant intermediate class (I, II, III); and that the two groups (6,7,8,9)
are added to the collections belonging to the main classes.
2. A process as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the second sorting operation (4,5) is carried out more accurately than the
first sorting operation.
1. Verfahren zum Sortieren zwiebel- und knollenartiger Produkte nach aufeinanderfolgenden
Größenklassen, das besonders zum Sortieren von Kartoffeln geeignet ist, wobei ein
Sortiervorgang durchgeführt wird, in dem nach Größen sortiert wird, die in wenigstens
zwei aufeinanderfolgende Hauptklassen fallen, wobei das Sortierverfahren dadurch gekennzeichnet
ist, daß in einem Übergangsbereich zwischen den wenigstens zwei aufeinanderfolgenden
Hauptklassen (20/29, 30/49, 50/69) wenigstens eine Zwischenklasse (IV, V) definiert
ist; daß ein erster Sortiervorgang durchgeführt wird, bei dem das Produkt nach Größen
sortiert wird, die in den verbleibenden Bereich (I, II, III) der wenigstens zwei Hauptklassen
(20/29, 30/49, 50/69) und die wenigstens eine Zwischenklasse (IV, V) fallen; daß die
in den verbleibenden Bereich (I, II, III) der Hauptklassen fallenden Produkte in Sammelbehälter
für zu diesen Hauptklassen (20/29, 30/49, 50/69) gehörende Produkte geleitet werden
(1, 2, 3); daß die in die wenigstens eine Zwischenklasse (IV, V) fallenden Produkte
einem zweiten Sortiervorgang (4, 5) unterzogen werden, wobei die in eine Zwischenklasse
fallenden Produkte in eine erste Gruppe (6, 7, 8, 9), die zu der einen der betreffenden
Zwischenklasse (IV, V) benachbarten Hauptklasse (20/29, 30/49, 50/69) gehört, und
in eine zweite Gruppe (6, 7, 8, 9) unterteilt werden, die zu der anderen der betreffenden
Zwischenklasse (IV, V) benachbarten Hauptklasse (20/29, 30/49, 50/69) gehört; und
daß die beiden Gruppen (6, 7, 8, 9) den Sammelbehältern der jeweiligen Hauptklasse
zugeschlagen werden.
2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß der zweite Sortiervorgang (4,
5) genauer durchgeführt wird als der erste Sortiervorgang.
1. Un procédé pour trier des produits bulbeux et tubéreux en fonction de classes de taille
successives, en particulier approprié pour trier des pommes de terre, selon lequel
une opération de tri est effectuée au cours de laquelle le produit est trié en fonction
de tailles comprises dans au moins deux classes principales successives, l'opération
de tri étant caractérisée en ce que dans un intervalle transitionnel entre les au moins deux classes principales
successives (20/29, 30/49, 50/69) est définie au moins une classe intermédiaire (IV,
V) ; en ce qu'une première opération de tri est effectuée au cours de laquelle le
produit est trié en fonction de tailles comprises dans l'intervalle restant (I, II,
III) des au moins deux classes principales (20/29, 30/49, 50/69) et l'au moins une
classe intermédiaire (IV, V) ; en ce que les produits sélectionnés comme compris dans
l'intervalle restant (I, II, III) des classes principales sont passés (1, 2, 3) dans
des collections de produit appartenant à ces classes principales (20/29, 30/49, 50/69)
; en ce que le produit compris dans l'au moins une classe intermédiaire (I, II, III)
est soumis à une seconde opération de tri (4, 5), le produit compris dans une classe
intermédiaire étant séparé dans un premier groupe (6, 7, 8, 9) appartenant à une classe
principale (20/29, 30/49, 50/69) concernant la classe intermédiaire applicable (IV,
V) et un second groupe (6, 7, 8, 9) appartenant à l'autre classe principale (20/29,
30/49, 50/69) concernant la classe intermédiaire applicable (I, II, III) ; et en ce
que les deux groupes (6, 7, 8, 9) sont additionnés aux collections appartenant aux
classes principales.
2. Un procédé comme revendiqué dans la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que la seconde opération de tri (4, 5) est effectuée plus précisément que la
première opération de tri.
