[0001] The invention relates to a display device having a display tube provided with a display
screen and a tube neck located opposite thereto, and including a convergence correction
device which comprises an arrangement of correction coils arranged around the neck,
and a convergence correction circuit for applying correction currents to the correction
coils.
[0002] United States Patent US 4,027,219 describes a device in which eight or twelve coils
(solenoids) wound on cores of a ferromagnetic material are arranged in a row around
the tube in such a way that their axes are coplanar, while they are incorporated in
a circuit having controllable current sources in such a way that, upon energization,
two four-pole fields and two six-pole fields are generated whose intensity and polarity
are controllable for obtaining (static) convergence.
[0003] Drawbacks of the use of such a configuration of solenoids are:
- the insensitivity, requiring a convergence circuit with relatively expensive amplifiers;
- little freedom of design as regards the exact field shape;
- a complicated electric circuit is required to generate all desired multipolar fields
with a limited number of coils;
- less suitable for dynamic convergence due to the large inductance of the solenoids.
[0004] It is an object of the invention to provide a construction which does not have at
least one of the above-mentioned drawbacks or which has the at least one drawback
to a lesser extent.
[0005] According to the invention, the display device of the type described in the opening
paragraph is therefore characterized in that each correction coil is of the planar
wound type and in that the arrangement of correction coils comprises at least a first
and a second system of coils each subtending an angle of 360°, each system comprising
a plurality of coils which jointly produce a magnetic 2N-pole field upon energization,
with N being 2, 3, etc.
[0006] The invention is based on the use of (coreless) coils having (for example concentric)
conductor turns which are present on a (cylindrical) surface. This provides the possibility
of easily placing a system or a number of systems of such coils in a position close
to the neck glass of the display tube (small diameter of the cylinder) so that a high
sensitivity is possible. The inductance is low due to the absence of cores. For this
concept particularly coils (referred to as print coils) are suitable which are arranged
on a surface of a flexible support by means of a printing technique, the support surrounding
the tube neck in such a way that the axes of the coils are radially directed towards
the axis of the tube neck. All this provides greater freedom of design. More particularly,
a separate system of coils can be used for each multipole field to be generated.
[0007] For example, two sets of four (print) coils, one for generating a four-pole x field
and one for generating a four-pole y field, can be used, combined or not combined
with two sets of six (print) coils, one for generating a six-pole x field and one
for generating a six-pole y field. Each set of coils may be arranged on its own flexible
support, while the two sets of coils each producing a four-pole field may be arranged
on one and the same flexible support (which is folded or rolled up in such a way that
the sets of coils form a winding, one surrounding the other), similarly as the two
coils each producing a six-pole field, or (and preferably) all correction coil systems
may be arranged on one and the same flexible support which is wound around the tube
a number of times (hereinafter also referred to as foil coil system). In this case
it is important that it should be possible for each set of coils to use the entire
circumference of the annular support, in other words, one set of coils for each turn.
[0008] As will be described hereinafter, the use of a foil coil system as described above
is particularly suitable to be combined with a convergence correction circuit supplying
the previously fixed correction currents for a number of positions on the display
screen, which currents are associated with said positions. This has,
inter alia, the advantage that the correction signal is independent of the deflection frequencies
used.
[0009] More particularly, such a convergence correction circuit is characterized in that
it comprises means for measuring the line deflection current and the field deflection
current and for supplying correction currents with reference to the measured currents.
[0010] A first, analogous, embodiment is characterized in that the convergence correction
circuit includes a multiplier circuit for supplying at least the square, the cube
and the fourth power of the deflection currents as output signals.
[0011] The correction circuit may include a matrix circuit for multiplying, multiplying
by weighting factors and adding the output signals of the multiplier circuit.
[0012] A second embodiment is characterized in that the convergence correction circuit includes
an A/D converter for digitizing the measured deflection currents, means for digitially
computing the correction currents and a D/A converter for supplying the correction
currents in an analog form.
[0013] A very interesting possibility is presented by incorporating a memory (for example
a calibrated (E)EPROM) in the correction circuit, in which memory the corrections
are stored which are necessary to correct the convergence errors at a number of measuring
points (for example, 25) on the display screen. With this zero convergence option
it is possible for the maximum convergence error to be at most 0.2 mm.
[0014] The coils may be of the planar wound type having concentric external turns surrounding
a central window. However, the coils have a greater sensitivity if, in accordance
with a preferred embodiment of the invention, they are of the type having external
turns surrounding an outer window and internal turns surrounding at least one inner
window. The outer and inner window(s) may be concentric or not concentric.
[0015] These and other aspects of the invention will be described in greater detail with
reference to the embodiments described hereinafter.
Fig. 1 shows diagrammatically a display device including an arrangement of coils for
convergence correction and
Fig. 2 shows a larger detail of Fig. 1;
Figs. 3A and 3B show embodiments of two four-pole field correction coil systems with
associated fields for the device shown in Figs. 1 and 2,
Fig. 4 shows an embodiment of an alternative four-pole field correction coil system;
Fig. 5 is a perspective elevational view of a foil coil correction device;
Fig. 6 shows a blank in the flat plane of the foil coil system of Fig. 5;
Fig. 7 is a cross-section taken on the line VII-VII of the display tube of Fig. 1;
Figs. 8 and 9 show diagrammatically a convergence circuit for supplying correction
currents to the coils of the system of Fig. 5, and
Figs. 10A and 10B show examples of fields generated by sixpole field correction coil
systems.
[0016] The colour display tube shown diagrammatically in Fig. 1 has a cylindrical neck portion
accommodating electron guns (not visible in Fig. 1) for generating three approximately
coplanar electron beams, and a funnel-shaped portion 3. A deflection unit 5 which
is combined with a convergence correction device 7 is arranged at the area of the
interface between the two portions. As is shown in Figs. 3A and 3B, this correction
device may comprise a plurality of coils 9 formed as flat spirals directed radially
towards the axis of the tube neck 1 and being arranged in a holder 11 secured to the
neck in such a way that their axes are coplanar. When the coils 9 are connected to
one or more current sources, magnetic fields resulting in a displacement of the three
electron beams 13, 15, 17 are generated within the tube neck 1. Red-blue y errors
(y astigmatic errors) can be corrected by means of four coils which are positioned
and energized in the way as shown in the embodiment of Fig. 3A. Red-blue x errors
(x astigmatic errors) can be corrected by means of four coils which are positioned
and energized in the way as shown in the embodiment of Fig. 3B. In fact, a four-pole
field having a horizontal axis direction produces a vertical displacement of the outer
beams 13, 17 in opposite directions (see inset Fig. 3A) and a four-pole field having
an axis direction at 45 degrees to the horizontal produces an opposite displacement
in the horizontal direction (see inset Fig. 3B).
[0017] Green-red/blue x errors (x coma errors) (see Fig. 10A) or green-red/blue y errors
(y coma errors) (see Fig. 10B) can be corrected by means of six coils which are positioned
and energized in the correct way.
[0018] As is known, for example, from United States Patent 3,725,831, a magnetic six-pole
field with an axis in the plane of the three beams 13, 15, 17,
i.e. horizontal, produces a simultaneous displacement of the two outer beams R(ed) and
B(lue) in a direction perpendicular to the plane of the beams (Fig. 10B), while the
central beam 15 is not influenced. A six-pole field, an axis of which is perpendicular
to the plane of the three beams (
i.e. vertical) thus produces a simultaneous displacement of the outer beams R(ed) and
B(lue) towards the left or the right.
[0019] The embodiment of Fig. 4 shows a coil configuration with four coils having a greater
sensitivity. This results from the fact that the coils in question have a given winding
distribution, with external turns surrounding an outer window and internal turns surrounding
an inner window.
Embodiment.
[0020] See Fig. 6. The conductors required for the correction coils are arranged on an elongate
strip of synthetic material foil, said conductors being formed in this case by "multiple"
wires with two parallel sub-wires having the desired distribution for four-pole x
(4px), four-pole y (4py), six-pole x (6px) and six-pole y (6py). The strip, which
is cut into four parts in connection with the space available for the Figure, is provided
with a lead-out 20 to which the multi-pole terminals are connected. The lead-out is
arranged as close as possible to the conductors for the 6-poles so as to minimize
the ohmic resistance and the inductance in the 6-pole circuits. This is important
because the 6-poles have a lower sensitivity than that of the 4-poles. The strip is
rolled up on a ring functioning as a support. In this case the strip surrounds the
ring four times. The support 7 with the coils (Fig. 5) is subsequently mounted on
the deflection unit at the location reserved for this purpose (see Fig. 2) and the
lead-out is fixed and provided with a connection to an electric circuit.
[0021] The arrangement 7 of correction coil systems may be arranged by means of a printing
technique on one and the same flexible support which is wound around the tube neck
a number of times and which is provided with a plurality of connection conductors
connected to a connector (Fig. 5). For example, the correction coil systems may be
arranged on the lower and upper sides of the flexible support, or all on the same
side. The use of the flexible support with printed coils renders it easily possible
to arrange the coil systems in (slightly) different axial positions, if so desired.
[0022] The coil systems of the above-mentioned convergence correction device are to be connected
to an electric circuit which supplies the suitable correction signals.
[0023] The use of a foil coil system as described hereinbefore leads to a high sensitivity
and a low inductance so that low current intensities and low voltages are sufficient
for correction. One can benefit from this advantage as such and make use of a conventional
correction circuit. However, an alternative is to utilize the advantage for designing
and using a perfected circuit.
[0024] A correction circuit which is very well applicable within the scope of the invention
is a circuit supplying correction signals as a function of the instantaneous position
of the beam spot on the display screen. In principle, the position of the beam/spot
on the screen depends on 3 parameters, namely:
- the horizontal deflection current (line deflection current)
- the vertical deflection current (field deflection current)
- the high voltage.
If the influence of the high-voltage variation can be eliminated or compensated for,
there are only two parameters which determine the position of the beam/spot on the
display screen. An alternative for determining the position on the display screen
of the horizontal and vertical deflection currents is to measure the time which has
elapsed after a vertical or horizontal synchronizing pulse. This determination of
the position on the display screen by means of a "time measurement" instead of a "current
measurement" has the great drawback that this measuring method is frequency-dependent.
Moreover, working with currents for obtaining the correction signals has the advantage
that the supply voltage of the correction circuit may be limited to 5 V. In contrast,
if the correction signals are generated on the basis of voltages, the supply voltage
must be much higher to obtain a range of amplification which is large enough.
[0025] Fig. 8 shows a first embodiment of a correction circuit for correcting, for example,
convergence errors on a display screen. With reference to the measured horizontal
deflection current I₁ and the measured vertical deflection current I
f, the correction circuit determines the position on the screen and computes the required
correction current/currents with reference to this position. The current I₁ is applied
to a multiplier circuit 52
via a current transformer 51. This multiplier circuit supplies I₁², I₁³, and I₁⁴ in addition
to the measured horizontal deflection current I₁. The current I
f flows through a resistor 53. The voltage measured across this resistor is applied
to a multiplier circuit 54. Outputs of this multiplier circuit 54 supply also I
f², I
f³ and I
f⁴ in addition to the vertical deflection current I
f. The outputs of the multiplier circuits 52 and 54 are connected to a matrix circuit
55. In the matrix circuit the required correction currents are obtained by multiplying
the currents I₁, I₁², I₁³, I₁⁴, I
f, I
f², I
f³ and I
f⁴ by the desired factors and by adding them. The correction currents Ic
k (with k = 1 ... n) are supplied at outputs 561 ... 56n.
The correction current Ic
k has the following shape:

The weighting factors a
ij are determined in advance and determine the weight of each I₁
iI
fj component in the sum. For each type of display tube/coil combination the factors
a
ij will have different values. These factors are determined by displaying a known test
signal on a relevant display tube/coil combination and by measuring the occurring
(convergence) errors at a fixed number of measuring points (for example, 25).
[0026] Fig. 9 shows a second embodiment of a correction circuit. In this embodiment the
current I₁ is converted to a digital value in an A/D converter 60 and stored in a
memory 62. The current I
f is also converted to a digital value in an A/D converter 61 and stored in the memory
62. A microprocessor 63 reads the stored horizontal and vertical deflection currents
from the memory, (with which the location on the display screen is unambiguously determined).
The microprocessor receives the correction values associated with this location on
the screen from an E²PROM and determines with reference thereto the digital values
of the correction currents Ic₁ ... Ic
n and applies these values
via the memory 62 at outputs to D/A converter 631 ... 63n. Each D/A converter is connected
to an amplifier 641 ... 64n. Each output of the amplifier is connected to an output
terminal 651 ... 65n of the correction circuit. The analog correction currents are
supplied at these output terminals. The output terminals 651 ... 65n may be connected
to correction coils (not shown).
[0027] The choice of taking 25 measuring points and determining, with reference thereto,
the weighting factors a
ij for generating the correction currents also determines the powers of the deflection
currents required to determine the correction currents completely. Horizontally, there
are 5 measuring points (in the case of 25 measuring points) and hence 5 comparisons.
These 5 comparisons are completely determined by means of 5 variables. By taking I₁⁰,
I₁¹, I₁², I₁³ and I₁⁴, this yields the required 5 variables. Moreover, there are vertically
5 measuring points and hence 5 comparisons. Here again it holds that these 5 comparisons
are completely determined by means of 5 variables for which I
f⁰, I
f¹, I
f², I
f³ and I
f⁴ are now taken. If there were 36 measuring points, the terms I₁⁵ and I
f⁵ would also be necessary, etc.
[0028] The correction circuits shown in Figs. 8 and 9 may supply correction signals for
dynamic convergence throughout the display screen. These correction circuits could
also be used for other required corrections, for example, other location error corrections
such as pincushion/barrel correction.
1. A display device having a display tube provided with a display screen and a tube neck
located opposite thereto, and including a convergence correction device which comprises
an arrangement of correction coils arranged around the neck, and a convergence correction
circuit for applying correction currents to the correction coils, characterized in
that each correction coil is of the planar wound type and in that the arrangement
of correction coils comprises at least a first and a second system of coils each subtending
an angle of 360°, each system comprising a plurality of coils which jointly produce
a magnetic 2N-pole field upon energization, with N being 2, 3, etc.
2. A device as claimed in Claim 1, characterized in that the systems of correction coils
are arranged around each other.
3. A device as claimed in Claim 1, characterized in that the systems of correction coils
are arranged on a common flexible support (19) arranged around the tube neck (1),
which support is wound around the tube neck a number of times.
4. A device as claimed in Claim 3, characterized in that one set of coils is provided
for each turn.
5. A device as claimed in Claim 1, characterized in that the convergence correction circuit
supplies correction currents which are a function of the instantaneous position of
the beam spot on the display screen.
6. A device as claimed in Claim 1, characterized in that the convergence correction circuit
comprises means for measuring the line deflection current and the field deflection
current and for supplying correction currents with reference to the measured currents.
7. A device as claimed in Claim 6, characterized in that the convergence correction circuit
includes a multiplier circuit for supplying at least the square, the cube and the
fourth power of the deflection currents as output signals.
8. A device as claimed in Claim 7, characterized in that the convergence correction circuit
includes a matrix circuit for multiplying, multiplying by weighting factors and adding
the output signals of the multiplier circuit.
9. A device as claimed in Claim 6, characterized in that the convergence correction circuit
includes an A/D converter for digitizing the measured deflection currents, means for
digitally computing the correction currents and a D/A converter for supplying the
correction currents in an analog form.
10. A device as claimed in Claim 9, characterized in that the convergence correction circuit
is coupled to a memory in which the weighting factors are stored which are dependent
on the type of display tube.
11. A display device having a display tube including a convergence correction device which
comprises an annular support supporting a plurality of correction coils whose axes
are coplanar, and a convergence correction circuit for applying correction currents
to the coils, characterized in that each coil comprises a plurality of coplanar turns
surrounding a window and in that the support comprises at least a first and a second
non-magnetic sub-support, one on top of the other, each subtending an angle of 360°,
each sub-support supporting a plurality of coils which jointly produce at least one
magnetic 2N-pole field upon energization, with N being 2, 3, etc.