| (19) |
 |
|
(11) |
EP 0 516 403 B1 |
| (12) |
EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION |
| (45) |
Mention of the grant of the patent: |
|
13.08.1997 Bulletin 1997/33 |
| (22) |
Date of filing: 28.05.1992 |
|
| (51) |
International Patent Classification (IPC)6: G07B 17/02 |
|
| (54) |
Method of remote diagnostics for franking machines
Ferndiagnoseverfahren für Frankiermaschine
Procédé de télédiagnostique pour machine à affranchir
|
| (84) |
Designated Contracting States: |
|
CH DE FR GB LI |
| (30) |
Priority: |
29.05.1991 GB 9111490
|
| (43) |
Date of publication of application: |
|
02.12.1992 Bulletin 1992/49 |
| (73) |
Proprietor: NEOPOST LIMITED |
|
Romford,
Essex RM1 2AR (GB) |
|
| (72) |
Inventor: |
|
- Abumehdi, Cyrus
Harlow,
Essex CM19 4PR (GB)
|
| (74) |
Representative: Loughrey, Richard Vivian Patrick et al |
|
HUGHES CLARK & CO
114-118 Southampton Row London WC1B 5AA London WC1B 5AA (GB) |
| (56) |
References cited: :
EP-A- 0 019 515 EP-A- 0 376 573 GB-A- 2 178 880 GB-A- 2 188 875
|
EP-A- 0 172 573 GB-A- 2 066 735 GB-A- 2 188 874
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European
patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to
the European patent
granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall
not be deemed to
have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent
Convention).
|
[0001] This invention relates to remotely diagnosing faults which may occur in franking
machines.
[0002] Franking machines in use in the field may develop faults at indeterminate periods.
Some faults may be insignificant and merely prevent use of certain facilities normally
provided by the machine or may be intermittent and affect use of the franking machine
at indeterminate times. Other more serious faults may occur which result in inhibition
of use of the machine for franking of mail items. The latter more serious faults cause
significant inconvenience to the user of the machine because the machine is not available
for use in franking mail. It is desirable to reduce or prevent the occurrence of faults
in machines in order to ensure that generally the machines are always available for
use when required. By maintaining a fault history of each machine in the field it
is possible from analysis of the fault history of any individual machine to predict
and provide an early warning of the possible occurrence of a specific fault. From
this predictive information action may be taken to service or modify the franking
machine prior to the occurrence of the predicted fault and thereby prevent loss of
use of the machine.
[0003] GB-A-2 178 880 discloses a postage meter inspection system in which the postage meter
is provided with sensors responsive to attempts to tamper with the postage meter,
i.e. attempts to obtain fraudulently postage charges for mail items. The sensors are
interrogated and indications of tampering attempts are communicated to a central location
either electronically or by mailing imprinted postcards.
[0004] According to one aspect of the invention a method of remotely obtaining data from
a franking machine in which data is stored in a memory of the franking machine; the
franking machine is periodically placed in communication with a remote central computer
and during said communication data is read from the memory and transmitted to the
remote central computer characterised in that a fault code identifying a fault occurring
during normal operation of the franking machine in franking mail items is stored in
the memory upon occurrence of the fault to form a fault history of the franking machine;
in that during each communication between the franking machine and the remote central
computer for remote recrediting of the franking machine the fault history stored in
the memory automatically is read out and transmitted to the remote re-crediting computer
and is written to a fault history store; and further characterised by analysing said
fault history stored in the fault history store to provide an indication of impending
faults.
[0005] According to another aspect of the invention a franking machine system including
a plurality of franking machines; each franking machine including accounting registers
for storing accounting data; communication means to transmit data between a remote
central resetting computer and each of said franking machines; each said franking
machine being operable to be remotely recredited by said remote central resetting
computer characterised in that each franking machine includes a fault history memory
and means operative upon occurrence of a fault in said franking machine during normal
operation of the franking machine in franking mail items to write into said fault
history memory a fault code representing the fault which has occurred so that the
memory stores a fault history comprising a series of faults codes representing a series
of occurred faults; in that during each recrediting of each franking machine, the
franking machine being recredited is operative automatically to read out the fault
history from the fault history memory and transmit the fault history to the remote
central resetting computer; in that the remote central resetting computer includes
a fault storage memory to store the fault histories transmitted from the respective
franking machines; and further characterised by a fault analysis computer operable
periodically to communicate with said remote central re-setting computer to read out
the fault histories stored in said fault storage means relating to said franking machines;
to analyse said fault histories and to generate for each said franking machine an
indication of impending faults.
[0006] The method in accordance with the invention will now be described by way of example
with reference to the drawings in which:-
Figure 1 is a block diagram illustrating franking machines connected for communication
with a remote resetting centre and service centre, and
Figure 2 is a flow chart of a sequences of events in remote fault diagnosis and remedial
action in respect of a franking machine.
[0007] Referring first to Figure 1, a franking machine 10
1 comprises an electronic microprocessor 11 for carrying out control and accounting
functions in the franking machine. A keyboard 12 is provided for input of data by
a user of the machine and a display device 13 is provided to enable the microprocessor
to display information to assist the user in using the franking machine. A read-only
memory (ROM) 14 is provided for the storage of fixed information such as program routines
for controlling operation of the microprocessor 11 and a random access memory 15 is
provided as a working store for the microprocessor. Non-volatile memories 16, 17 are
provided for the storage of accounting data and as is well known in franking machines
may include a descending register for storing a value of credit available for use
in franking of mail items with postage value, a tote register for storing an accumulated
value of postage used in franking mail items, an items register storing a count of
the number of items franked and a high items register for storing a count of the number
of items franked with a postage value in excess of a predetermined value. A printing
device 18 is controlled by the microprocessor to print franking impressions on mail
items. In franking machines which operate in a prepayment mode, the user of the machine
makes a payment to the postal authority and the value of the payment is entered into
the descending register of the franking machine to provide an amount of credit available
for use in franking mail items with postage value. The read-only memory 14 stores
a program routine for controlling the microprocessor in carrying out franking operations.
In such franking operations, the user of the machine inputs by means of the keyboard
12 a value of postage with which a mail item is to be franked and the microprocessor
checks to determine that there is a sufficient value of credit in the descending register
for required franking. If there is sufficient credit the microprocessor continues
with the program routine to modify the contents of the registers to take account of
the franking being effected and to operate the printing device to print a franking
impression with the required postage value on the mail item. If there is insufficient
credit available the franking routine is terminated and printing of the franking impression
is not effected. The franking machine remains incapable of carrying out further franking
operations until such time as additional credit has been entered into the descending
register.
[0008] As is well known in franking machines those operational parts of the machine which
maintain accounting records and which effect printing of the franking impression are
protected from attempts to fraudulently interfere with the operation thereof. To this
end the operational parts of the machine are housed in a secure housing access to
which may be made only by authorised personnel of the postal authority or of an authorised
service organisation and any external electrical connections to the machine are protected
to prevent external application of unauthorised signals in an attempt to use the machine
fraudulently. The accounting operations and storing of the accounting records are
carried out in a manner to ensure integrity of the accounting data even in the event
of the occurrence of faults in the machine. For example, each register is duplicated
in each of the non-volatile memory devices 16, 17 so that if one device should fail,
the registers in the other device will continue to store the accounting data.
[0009] The franking machine is provided with an input/output interface 19 communicating
with the microprocessor to enable the microprocessor to communicate with apparatus
external to the franking machine.
[0010] Previously, when the credit value in the descending register had fallen to a low
value it was necessary for the postage meter of the franking machine to be taken to
a resetting authority such as the postal authority to have an increased value of credit
entered into the descending register. However current postage meters are constructed
to have provision to enable increased credit to be entered remotely without removing
the postage meter from the user's premises. A system for re-setting credit in a franking
machine remotely by means of a re-crediting computer 20 is described in our European
patent application 89313220.9 (EP-A-0 376 573). Communication is established between
the microprocessor of the franking machine and a re-crediting authority computer 20
via the interface 19 and a telephone network 21. The microprocessor 11 and the computer
20 carry out a series of steps in which credit update information is transmitted from
the computer to the franking machine and in which the franking machine sends accounting
data from its registers to the computer. Security in transmission of the information
over open telephone lines is maintained by transmitting a transaction identity code
comprising a pseudo-random number in messages between the computer and franking machine
and by encrypting the messages.
[0011] During operation of franking machines faults may occur which in themselves do not
prevent operation of the machine for franking purposes but which may provide an indication
that a more serious fault condition preventing use of the machine has a probability
of occurring in the future. Accordingly it is desirable to log faults as they occur
in each machine to provide a fault history for each individual franking machine and
to analyse these faults to determine if from experience any of the machines in use
in the field have a fault history which suggests that they are likely to fail in operation.
The franking machine 10
1 is provided with a fault register 22 having a number "n" of storage locations. Upon
occurrence of a fault, the microprocessor writes a code representing the type of fault
which has occurred into a storage location of the fault register, the codes being
written into the storage locations in turn. Thus at any time, the register stores
a log of the most recent "n" faults which have occurred. The program routine carried
out by the franking machine during re-setting of credit includes a sub-routine in
which the contents of all the storage locations of the fault register 22 are read
out and transmitted to the re-crediting authority computer 20. The storage locations
of the fault register are erased so that after read out, the register is ready to
receive the code representing the next fault when it occurs. Instead of erasing the
storage locations of the fault register, the storage locations may be overwritten
in turn in such a manner that when the code for each new fault is written to the register
the code for the oldest fault is overwritten. Accordingly the codes stored in the
register always represent the most recent "n" faults which have occurred. The re-crediting
authority computer is provided with memory 23 and when the computer receives the log
of fault codes from a franking machine in the course of re-setting credit in that
franking machine, the computer writes the log of fault codes into its the memory 23.
It will be appreciated that a large number of franking machines 10
1 - 10
n are re-credited as and when required by a single central re-crediting computer. Accordingly
the log of fault codes is stored in the memory together with information identifying
the meter from which the log has been received. Thus over a period of time, the computer
20 will receive and store in memory 23 the fault logs or histories of all those machines
10
1 - 10
n which have had credit updated during that period. It will be appreciated that this
transmission of fault data occurs automatically each time a franking machine is re-credited
and hence as result does not require communication with the franking machine specifically
for the purpose of transmitting fault data. Accordingly the user of the machine is
not required to carry out any additional operation and the accumulation and transmission
of fault data is transparent to the user. Furthermore by transmitting the fault log
data as part of the re-crediting routine, the data is transmitted and collected at
the computer memory 23 at a periodicity which corresponds to some extent upon the
amount of use of each franking machine. In Figure 1, the fault register 22 is shown
as a separate element however if desired the fault register may be implemented as
a register in the non-volatile memories 16, 17 and like the accounting registers in
these memories may be duplicated in each of the memories 16 and 17.
[0012] Servicing and correcting faults in franking machines is carried out by an authorised
service organisation. The service organisation is provided with a computer 24 which
is capable of communicating with the re-crediting authority computer 20 and is permitted
to have access to the fault log data in memory 23. Periodically the computer 24 accesses
the fault log in memory 23 and an analysis of the faults which have occurred on the
franking machines is carried out. Such an analysis may predict that a specific franking
machine is likely to develop a specific fault and in accordance with that prediction
a service engineer visits the site of the franking machine to carry out modification
or repair of the machine to prevent occurrence of the predicted fault. The analysis
alternatively may predict that a specific batch of machines is prone to one or more
specific faults in which event action may be taken to modify all machines in that
batch to prevent occurrence of that fault in those machines of the batch which are
not yet affected.
[0013] Where the re-crediting of franking machines is carried out by means of transportable
memory modules as in the CREDIPAC re-crediting system marketed by Alcatel Business
Systems Limited, the transportable modules may be utilised to convey fault log data
from the franking machine to the computer 20 instead of utilising the telephone network.
For a more detailed description of the operation of re-crediting utilising a transportable
memory module reference may be made to the specification of our British patent No.
2173738.
[0014] As hereinbefore described, transmission of the fault log data from the franking machine
is effected each time the franking machine is re-credited. However transmission of
the fault log data may be effected as part of another routine which occurs periodically
for each machine. For example, franking machines which are operated in a post payment
mode do not carry out re-crediting operations. However periodically the postal authority
require to receive data relating to usage of the machines and for this purpose receive
the values stored in the accounting data registers to enable the authority to audit
usage of the machines. Where the data relating to usage of the machines collected
remotely by transmission of the data either by means of the telephone network or for
example by means of a transportable module the transmission of fault log data may
be effected as a sub-routine of the main routine for collection of account data.
[0015] The flow chart of Figure 2 illustrates the steps carried out in each of the franking
machines 10
1 - 10
n, the central re-crediting computer 20 and the service computer 24 to provide fault
histories of each machine, to transmit these fault histories to the service computer
and to modify or repair the machines in dependence upon analysis of the fault histories.
[0016] Analysis of the fault log of a specific franking machine may indicate that there
is a probability of failure of a component of that machine which would result in the
machine becoming inoperable to effect franking of mail items and hence require an
on-site visit by a service engineer to effect an early repair or replacement of that
component to ensure that the machine continues to operate satisfactorily and remains
in service. However the analysis of the fault log may indicate a fault history which
does not require physical replacement or repair of a component. For example fault
may arise from software program routines or sub-routines particularly under certain
conditions of use of the machine in which there is interaction between sub-routines
which had not been envisaged when the software was written or installed in the machine.
Such faults may also arise due to change in tolerances of electronic components such
that they are required by a software routine to operate close to a current tolerance
limit. A modification of the software routine may be made which has the effect of
operating the component safely within its current tolerance. In response to such faults
being registered in any of the franking machines, transmitted to the re-credit computer
20, and written to the memory 23 and then being transferred to the service computer
for analysis, the software may be modified to overcome any tendency for the detected
fault to occur. Instead of installing the modified software by on-site visists of
a service engineer, the service computer 24 may communicate via the telephone network
21 with a selected one of the franking machines 10
1 - 10
n to enable the modified software code to be transmitted to the franking machines from
the service computer via the telephone network. The modified software code may be
transmitted to all franking machines of a specified model number in the field or only
to those franking machines which, from analysis of their fault histories, indicate
a need for modification of the software. Acess to the memories in the franking machines
which store software code must be restricted to prevent unauthorised modification
of the software and accordingly any transmission from the service computer to the
franking machines for the purpose of modifying or writing new software routines into
the memories of the franking machines includes signals which enable access to the
software code memories to be obtained. Such transmissions are carried out in a secure
manner to ensure that only authorised transmissions enable access to the software
code memories and that only the software code transmitted in an authorised transmission
is written to the memories of the franking machines. A method of securely transmitting
data over a telephone network for the purpose of re-crediting a franking machine is
described in our European patent application 89313220.9 referred to hereinbefore.
A similar secure method of transmitting data may be used for transmission of signals
to modify operation of the franking machine. Where re-crediting is effected by means
of a transportable memory module as described in our British patent No. 2173738 and
referred to hereinbefore modification of software code in a franking machine may be
effected by utilising the transportable memory module to carry the modified software
code to be written into the memory of the franking machine. Our British patent describes
a method of ensuring security of the data carried by the module and such a method
may be utilised to ensure security of signals carried by the module to be utilised
to modify operation of the franking machine.
[0017] The modification of software may include re-configuration of variables capable of
being set in the franking machine software program routine. The software memories
of the franking machine may be loaded with a number of sub-routines in manufacture
of the franking machine. Some of these sub-routines may be activated upon installation
of the franking machine while others of these sub-routines are left in-activated.
During use of the franking machine in the field it may be desired to de-activate or
activate selected ones of these co-resident sub-routines either to modify the facilities
provided by the franking machine or in order to overcome the probability of a fault
arising as indicated by the analysis of the fault history of that machine.
[0018] When faults occur in the franking machine, fault flags are set to indicate the occurence
of the fault. Some faults may arise due to a delected error in data stored in the
franking machine. Electronic accounting data is handled by the circuits of the franking
machine in a manner such that, except in the event of catastrophic failure, the data
can be re-constructed. For example each register which stores accounting data is replicated
four times and in each operation of the franking machine involving the accounting
data the contents of the four replications of the registers are compared. If the contents
are identical continued operation of the franking machine is permitted. However if
the contents of three replications of the register are the same but one register is
different a fault flag is set to inhibit continued operation of the machine. Since
the contents of three replications of the register are identical it is clear that
these replications contain correct data. Accordingly a sub-routine can be activated
to correct the data in that one of the replications which is different from the other
three replications and to reset the fault flag. This sub-routine may be activated
remotely by the service computer using a secure transmission and then the fault flag
may be reset remotely by a secure transmission. If the data has been corrected the
fault flag can be reset. Other faults may occur which do not involve electronic data.
If the fault is transitory or intermittent a transmission to reset the fault flag
will be successful in resetting the fault flag. However where a permanent or non-transitory
fault exists the reset of the fault flag will fail. Many faults are transitory or
intermittent and hence the remote resetting of the fault flag allows the franking
machine to be continued to be used until a service repair can be effected.
[0019] In Figure 1, the service computer 24 is shown as communicating with the re-credit
computer by means of a dedicated communication link 25. However it is to be understood
that the service computer may communicate with the re-credit computer via the telephone
network 21.
1. A method of remotely obtaining data from a franking machine in which data is stored
in a memory (22) of the franking machine (101) ; the franking machine is periodically placed in communication with a remote central
computer (20) and during said communication data is read from the memory (22) and
transmitted to the remote central computer (20) characterised in that a fault code
identifying a fault occurring during normal operation of the franking machine (101) in franking mail items is stored in the memory (22) upon occurrence of the fault
to form a fault history of the franking machine; in that during each communication
between the franking machine and the remote central computer (20) for remote recrediting
of the franking machine the fault history stored in the memory (22) automatically
is read out and transmitted to the remote re-crediting computer and is written to
a fault history store (23); and further characterised by analysing said fault history
stored in the fault history store (23) to provide an indication of impending faults.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1 further characterised by the step of storing at the
remote central computer (20) the fault history received from each of a plurality of
franking machines (101-10n) during each recrediting of the respective franking machines by the remote central
computer (20).
3. A method as claimed in claim 2 including the step of periodically accessing the fault
histories stored by the remote central computer (20) and transmitting said fault histories
to a fault analysis computer (24).
4. A method as claimed claim 2 or 3 further characterised in that the fault history is
transmitted from the franking machine (101-10n) to the remote central computer (20) via an input/output interface (19) of the franking
machine and a telephone network (21).
5. A method as claimed in claim 2 or 3 further characterised in that the fault history
is transmitted from the franking machine to the remote central computer (20) by connecting
a transportable memory module to the franking machine and writing said fault history
into the transportable memory module; connecting said module to the remote central
computer (20) and reading the fault history from the module to the computer.
6. A method as claimed in any one of claims 2 to 5 further characterised by the steps
in response to the analysis of the fault history stored in the fault history store
of establishing communication between the remote central computer and a selected one
of the franking machines (101-10n) and by said communication effecting modification of operation of said selected franking
machine.
7. A method as claimed in claim 6 further characterised in that during the communication
established with the selected one of the franking machines (101-10n) the remote central computer transmits a signal to the selected franking machine
effective to modify a program routine or sub-routine in said selected franking machine.
8. A method as claimed in claim 6 further characterised in that the modification of the
program routine comprises activating or de-activating program sub-routines which are
co-resident in the selected franking machine.
9. A method as claimed in claim 6, 7 or 8 further characterised by the step of transmitting
from the central computer a reset signal to the selected franking machine effective
to reset a fault flag in said selected franking machine.
10. A method as claimed in any one of claims 6 to 9 further characterised in that the
transmission of signals to modify operation of a selected franking machine is effected
in a secure manner.
11. A franking machine system including a plurality of franking machines (101-10n) ; each franking machine including accounting registers (16, 17) for storing accounting
data; communication means (21) to transmit data between a remote central resetting
computer and each of said franking machines; each said franking machine being operable
to be remotely recredited by said remote central resetting computer characterised
in that each franking machine includes a fault history memory (22) and means (11)
operative upon occurrence of a fault in said franking machine during normal operation
of the franking machine in franking mail items to write into said fault history memory
(22) a fault code representing the fault which has occurred so that the memory (22)
stores a fault history comprising a series of faults codes representing a series of
occurred faults; in that during each recrediting of each franking machine, the franking
machine being recredited is operative automatically to read out the fault history
from the fault history memory (22) and transmit the fault history to the remote central
resetting computer; in that the remote central resetting computer includes a fault
storage memory to store the fault histories transmitted from the respective franking
machines; and further characterised by a fault analysis computer (24) operable periodically
to communicate with said remote central re-setting computer (20) to read out the fault
histories stored in said fault storage means (23) relating to said franking machines;
to analyse said fault histories and to generate for each said franking machine an
indication of impending faults.
1. Verfahren zum Gewinnen von Daten auf Distanz aus einer Frankiermaschine, in welchem
Daten in einem Speicher (22) der Frankiermaschine (101) gespeichert werden, die Frankiermaschine periodisch mit einem entfernten Zentralcomputer
(20) in Verbindung gesetzt wird und während dieser Verbindung Daten aus dem Speicher
(22) gelesen und an den entfernten Zentralcomputer (20) übermittelt werden, dadurch
gekennzeichnet, dass ein Fehlercode, der einen während des normalen Betriebs der Frankiermaschine
(101) zum Frankieren von Postgegenständen auftretenden Fehler identifiziert, nach dem
Auftreten des Fehlers in dem Speicher (22) gespeichert wird, um eine Fehlergeschichte
der Frankiermaschine zu bilden, dass während jeder Verbindung zwischen der Frankiermaschine
und dem entfernten Zentralcomputer (20), zum Neuausstatten der Frankiermaschine mit
Kredit aus Distanz, die in dem Speicher (22) gespeicherte Fehlergeschichte automatisch
gelesen und an den entfernten Neukreditier-Computer übermittelt wird und in einen
Fehlergeschichte-Speicher (23) geschrieben wird und dass die in dem Fehlergeschichte-Speicher
(23) gespeicherte Fehlergeschichte analysiert wird, um eine Anzeige von bevorstehenden
Fehlern zu erzeugen.
2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass in dem entfernten Zentralcomputer
(20) die Fehlergeschichte gespeichert wird, die von jeder einer Mehrzahl von Frankiermaschinen
(101 - 10n), während des Neukreditierens der betreffenden Frankiermaschinen durch den entfernten
Zentralcomputer (20), erhalten werden.
3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2, in welchem die im entfernten Zentralcomputer (20) gespeicherten
Fehlergeschichten periodisch gelesen werden und die Fehlergeschichten an einen Fehleranalyse-Computer
(24) übermittelt werden.
4. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2 oder 3, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Fehlergeschichte
von der Frankiermaschine (101- 10n) über eine Ein-/Ausgangs-Schnittstelle (19) der Frankiermaschine und ein Telefonnetz
(21) an den entfernten Zentralcomputer (20) übermittelt wird.
5. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2 oder 3, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Fehlergeschichte
von der Frankiermaschine an den entfernten Zentralcomputer (20) übermittelt wird,
indem ein tragbares Speichermodul mit der Frankiermaschine verbunden wird und die
Fehlergeschichte in das tragbare Speichermodul geschrieben wird, das Modul dann mit
dem entfernten Zentralcomputer (20) verbunden wird und die Fehlergeschichte aus dem
Modul in den Computer gelesen wird.
6. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 2 bis 5, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass in Abhängigkeit
von der Analyse der im Fehlergeschichte-Speicher gespeicherten Fehlergeschichte eine
Verbindung zwischen dem entfernten Zentralcomputer und einer ausgewählten der Frankiermaschinen
(101 - 10n) hergestellt wird und über diese Verbindung der Betrieb der ausgewählten Frankiermaschine
geändert wird.
7. Verfahren nach Anspruch 6, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass während der mit der ausgewählten
Frankiermaschine (101 - 10n) hergestellten Verbindung der entfernte Zentralcomputer ein Signal an die ausgewählte
Frankiermaschine übermittelt, welches eine Aenderung einer Programmroutine oder Unterroutine
in der ausgewählten Frankiermaschine bewirkt.
8. Verfahren nach Anspruch 6, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Aenderung der Programmroutine
eine Aktivierung oder Inaktivierung von nebeneinander in der ausgewählten Frankiermaschine
vorhandenen Programm-Unterroutinen enthält.
9. Verfahren nach Anspruch 6, 7 oder 8, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass vom Zentralcomputer
ein Löschsignal an die ausgewählte Frankiermaschine übermittelt wird, welches die
Löschung einer Fehlermarke in der ausgewählten Frankiermaschine bewirkt.
10. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 6 bis 9, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Uebermittlung
von Signalen zur Aenderung des Betriebes einer ausgewählten Frankiermaschine in einer
gesicherten Weise erfolgt.
11. Frankiermaschinenanlage, die eine Mehrzahl von Frankiermaschinen (101 - 10n) enthält, wobei jede Frankiermaschine Buchhaltungsregister (16, 17) zum Speichern
von Buchhaltungsdaten enthält, Verbindungsmittel (21) zum Uebermitteln von Daten zwischen
einem entfernten, zentralen Neueinstell-Computer und jeder der Frankiermaschinen vorgesehen
sind und jede Frankiermaschine betätigbar ist, um von dem entfernten, zentralen Neueinstell-Computer
aus Distanz neu mit Kredit ausgestattet zu werden, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass jede
Frankiermaschine einen Fehlergeschichte-Speicher (22) und Mittel (11) enthält, welche
nach dem Auftreten eines Fehlers in der Frankiermaschine während des normalen Betriebs
der Frankiermaschine zum Frankieren von Postgegenständen wirksam sind, um in den Fehlergeschichte-Speicher
(22) einen Fehlercode zu schreiben, der den aufgetretenen Fehler darstellt, so dass
der Speicher (22) eine Fehlergeschichte speichert, welche eine Reihe von Fehlercodes
enthält, die eine Reihe von aufgetretenen Fehlern darstellt, dass während jedes Neukreditierens
jeder Frankiermaschine die Frankiermaschine, die neu kreditiert wird, wirksam ist
zum automatischen Lesen der Fehlergeschichte aus dem Fehlergeschichte-Speicher (22)
und Uebermitteln der Fehlergeschichte an den entfernten, zentralen Neueinstell-Computer,
dass der entfernte, zentrale Neueinstell-Computer einen Fehlergeschichte-Speicher
zum Speichern der von den betreffenden Frankiermaschinen übermittelten Fehlergeschichten
enthält und dass ein Fehleranalyse-Computer (24) vorgesehen ist, der periodisch betätigbar
ist, um mit dem entfernten, zentralen Neueinstell-Computer (20) in Verbindung zu treten,
die in den Fehlerspeichermitteln (23) gespeicherten, die Frankiermaschinen betreffenden
Fehlergeschichten zu lesen, diese Fehlergeschichten zu analysieren und für jede Frankiermaschine
eine Anzeige von bevorstehenden Fehlern zu erzeugen.
1. Procédé pour obtenir à distance des données provenant d'une machine à affranchir,
dans lequel les données sont stockées dans une mémoire (22) de la machine à affranchir
(10
1) ; la machine à affranchir est placée périodiquement en communication avec un ordinateur
central (20) placé à distance et, pendant cette communication, les données sont lues
dans la mémoire (22) et transmises à l'ordinateur central à distance (20),
caractérisé en ce que
- un code de défaut identifiant un défaut apparaissant pendant le fonctionnement normal
de la machine à affranchir (101) dans l'affranchissement d'articles de courrier, est stocké dans la mémoire (22)
à l'apparition du défaut, pour former un historique de défauts de la machine à affranchir
;
- pendant chaque communication entre la machine à affranchir et l'ordinateur central
à distance (20) destiné à recréditer à distance la machine à affranchir, l'historique
de défauts stocké dans la mémoire (22) est automatiquement lu et transmis à l'ordinateur
de reconstitution de crédit à distance, pour être écrit dans une mémoire d'historique
de défauts (23) ; et en outre
- on analyse l'historique de défauts stocké dans la mémoire d'historique de défauts
(23) pour obtenir une indication de défauts menaçant d'arriver.
2. Procédé selon la revendication 1,
caractérisé en outre par
l'étape consistant à stocker dans l'ordinateur central à distance (20) l'historique
de défauts reçu de chacune d'un certain nombre de machines à affranchir (101-10n) pendant chaque reconstitution de crédit des machines à affranchir respectives par
l'ordinateur central à distance (20).
3. Procédé selon la revendication 2,
comprenant
l'étape consistant à accéder périodiquement aux historiques de défauts stockés par
l'ordinateur central à distance (20), et à transmettre ces historiques de défauts
à un ordinateur d'analyse de défauts (24).
4. Procédé selon la revendication 2 ou 3,
caractérisé en outre en ce que
l'historique de défauts est transmis de la machine à affranchir (101-10n) vers l'ordinateur central à distance (20) par l'intermédiaire d'une interface d'entrée/sortie
(19) de la machine à affranchir, et par un réseau téléphonique (21).
5. Procédé selon la revendication 2 ou 3,
caractérisé en outre en ce que
l'historique de défauts est transmis de la machine à affranchir vers l'ordinateur
central à distance (20) en connectant un module de mémoire transportable à la machine
à affranchir et en écrivant l'historique de défauts dans le module de mémoire transportable,
en connectant le module à l'ordinateur central à distance (20), et en lisant l'historique
de défauts transmis du module à l'ordinateur.
6. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 2 à 5,
caractérisé en outre par
les étapes consistant, en réponse à l'analyse de l'historique de défauts stocké dans
la mémoire d'historique de défauts, à établir une communication entre l'ordinateur
central à distance et l'une, sélectionnée, des machines à affranchir (101-10n), et à effectuer, par cette communication, une modification de fonctionnement de
la machine à affranchir sélectionnée.
7. Procédé selon la revendication 6,
caractérisé en outre en ce que
pendant la communication établie avec celle, sélectionnée, des machines à affranchir
(101-10n), l'ordinateur central à distance transmet à la machine à affranchir sélectionnée,
un signal servant à modifier un programme ou un sous-programme dans la machine à affranchir
sélectionnée.
8. Procédé selon la revendication 6,
caractérisé en outre en ce que
la modification du programme comprend l'activation ou la désactivation de sous-programmes
qui cohabitent dans la machine à affranchir sélectionnée.
9. Procédé selon la revendication 6, 7 ou 8,
caractérisé en outre par
l'étape consistant à transmettre de l'ordinateur central à la machine à affranchir
sélectionnée, un signal de remise à l'état initial servant à remettre à l'état initial
un drapeau de signalisation de défaut dans la machine à affranchir sélectionnée.
10. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 6 à 9,
caractérisé en outre en ce que
la transmission des signaux pour modifier le fonctionnement d'une machine à affranchir
sélectionnée, est effectué d'une manière sécurisée.
11. Système de machines à affranchir comprenant un certain nombre de machines à affranchir
(10
1-10
n), chaque machine à affranchir comprenant des registres de comptabilité (16, 17) pour
stocker des données de comptabilité, des moyens de communication (21) pour transmettre
les données entre un ordinateur de remise à l'état initial central, à distance, et
chacune des machines à affranchir, chaque machine à affranchir pouvant fonctionner
pour être recréditée par l'ordinateur de remise à l'état initial central, à distance,
caractérisé en ce que
- chaque machine à affranchir comprend une mémoire d'historique de défauts (22) et
des moyens (11) fonctionnant au moment de l'apparition d'un défaut dans la machine
à affranchir pendant le fonctionnement normal de celle-ci dans l'affranchissement
d'articles de courrier, pour écrire dans la mémoire d'historique de défauts (22) un
code de défaut représentant le défaut qui est apparu, de façon que la mémoire (22)
stocke un historique de défauts comprenant une série de codes de défauts représentant
une série de défauts ayant apparu ;
- pendant chaque reconstitution de crédit de chaque machine à affranchir, la machine
à affranchir qui est recréditée fonctionne automatiquement pour lire l'historique
de défauts dans la mémoire d'historique de défauts (22), et pour transmettre l'historique
de défauts à l'ordinateur de remise à l'état initial central, à distance ;
- l'ordinateur de remise à l'état initial central, à distance, comprend une mémoire
de stockage de défauts pour stocker les historiques de défauts transmis par les machines
à affranchir respectives ; et en outre
- par un ordinateur d'analyse de défauts (24) pouvant fonctionner périodiquement pour
communiquer avec l'ordinateur de remise à l'état initial central, à distance, (20),
pour lire les historiques de défauts stockés dans les moyens de stockage de défauts
(23) concernant les machines à affranchir, afin d'analyser ces historiques de défauts
et de générer, pour chaque machine à affranchir, une indication retardant les défauts.

