Technical Field
[0001] This invention relates to a method of and apparatus for controlling turbulence in
a wall-bounded fluid flow field.
Relevant Publications
[0002]
(1) "Plane Waves and Structures in Turbulent Channel Flow" by L. Sirovich, K. S. Ball,
and L. R. Keefer, Phys. Fluids A2(12), December 1990, p2217-2226.
(2) "Propagating Structures in Wall-Bounded Turbulent Flow", L. Sirovich, K. S. Ball
and R. A. Handler, Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynamics (1991), 2:307-317.
Background Art
[0003] From the viewpoint of classical fluid mechanics, turbulence is perceived as a chaotic
condition with the excitation of all possible degrees of freedom. This perception
is supported from direct observation of large scale activities, such as weather patterns
in the atmosphere and water flowing in a pipe, to mundane experiences like stirring
cream into coffee, or mixing paint.
[0004] Turbulence can be harmful or helpful: it produces undesired drag on a car or an airplane;
but it effects mixing fuel with air in an engine, or rapidly distributing heat in
a room. Turbulence has had an enormous impact on human experience, but its perception
as a chaotic condition has resisted scientific analysis until recent years. With the
advent of super computers which permit the numerical investigation of wall-bounded
turbulent flow, and the performance of modern experiments, there has been a dramatic
shift in the perception of turbulence. Where it was once viewed as being a chaotic
condition, turbulence is now viewed as having coherent patterns of activity in the
midst of apparent chaos.
[0005] Careful scrutiny of a wall or boundary of streaming turbulent flow, as for example,
in the case of air flow over an airplane wing, or liquid flow inside a pipeline, has
shown the presence of coherent structures in the form of pairs of counter-rotating
streamwise rolls adjacent the walls, but located at the outer edge and beyond the
sublayer. These rolls, which are sometimes referred to as streaks, show considerable
meander and variation in their dynamic activity. Of great importance is their sudden
contortion or kinking, resulting in a sudden bursting forth of slow moving fluid from
near the wall into the fast moving main body of fluid motion. This bursting results
in a net drag on the walls. It has been estimated that these bursts, which account
for 80% of the drag on a wall, occur only roughly 20% of the time. Again, a study
of the patterns of such flow shows that the contortion of the rolls undergoes a stereotypical
coherence pattern through temporal change that is typical of all wall-bounded turbulence.
[0006] To specify the width of the streaks, it is first necessary to recognize that the
streaks are a manifestation of local conditions beyond the sublayer of the flow adjacent
to a wall, and not the nature of the wall, nor the flow field significantly spaced
from the wall. Local conditions are fully specified by the average frictional stress
at a wall,
s, the density of the fluid,
r, and the viscosity of the fluid,
m. These quantities define a local size dimension, or length scale

which is usually referred to as a wall unit and is equal to m/(sr)
½. The dominant roll diameter is roughly 100 wall units, or 200

per pair.
[0007] The term "dominant", in referring to the roll diameter, means that the greatest amount
of turbulent energy (of the fluctuating velocity) resides in modes of activity of
this size. There is, in addition, other modes of the same roll type, having a range
of sizes and which also contain significant amounts of turbulent energy. In summary,
the major contribution to drag on a wall arises because of the disruption of the orderliness
of these roll type modes, to their contortion, and finally to the relatively violent
bursting events that mixes slow moving fluid into more rapidly moving fluid.
[0008] This picture of the events in wall-bounded turbulence was significantly enhanced
with the discovery that propagating structures are also present in the turbulent wall
region. In reference (1) cited above, it is shown that propagating structures are
coherent patterns which propagate at a constant group speed. In reference (2) cited
above, the existence of propagating modes was further confirmed. As an aside, a literature
search produced a paper written 20 years ago in which experiments on wall turbulence
hinted at, but did not directly suggest, the presence and function served by such
propagating modes in turbulent flow.
[0009] As it is argued in the above cited publications, the propagating modes act as triggers
for the bursting events that give rise to the drag producing events found in turbulent
wall-bounded flows. Although the propagating modes carry relatively little energy
themselves, bursting events do not occur unless the propagating modes are present.
In addition, the experimentally and numerically measured time courses of the bursting
events corresponds to that of the propagating modes. The most energetic, and therefore
the most important of the propagating modes, are those that propagate at an angle
of about 65° from the streamwise direction; and those in the range 50-80° have the
dominant energy content of the propagating modes.
[0010] The wavelengths of the triggering modes are also an important factor. Those waves
with wavelengths comparable to the roll size play a significant role in the bursting
events.
[0011] The most significant triggering modes have a lateral extent which is comparable to
the wavelength of the energy bearing roll modes. This strongly implies the existence
of a resonance mechanism which, through the triggering operation, facilitates ejection
of the roll modes. For reference purposes, the main triggering modes are sometimes
referred as the long wavelengths modes. There are no significant longer wavelength
modes present, but many shorter wavelength modes are present.
[0012] It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method of and apparatus
for modifying and managing turbulent flow through a modification of the trigger modes.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0013] The present invention controls turbulence in a wall-bounded fluid flow field having
a turbulent wall region characterized by a system of roll pairs or streaks extending
in the direction of flow by introducing into the turbulent wall region, a disturbance
field that is strongly coupled to, and modifies propagating structures that interact
with the system of roll pairs. The disturbance field effects changes in those propagating
structures interacting with the system of roll pairs for the purpose of increasing
turbulent mixing in one extreme or decreasing turbulent drag in another extreme. Preferably,
the disturbance field is modulated by the resonant wavelength which is in the range
100-300

, where

is the size of a wall unit. The preferred amplitude of the disturbance is in the
range 10-20

.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0014] Embodiments of the present invention are shown by way of example in the accompanying
drawings wherein:
Fig. 1 is a cross-section showing wall-bounded fluid flow, where the cross-section
is taken perpendicular to the direction of flow;
Fig. 2 is a schematic plan view of the fluid flow field shown in Fig. 1 showing streaks
or rolls adjacent a wall boundary having herring-bone undulations;
Fig. 3 is a cross-section through the wall showing the undulations;
Fig. 4 is a modified version of the undulations;
Fig. 5 is a cross-section of a wall-bounded fluid flow field taken in a direction
perpendicular to the direction of fluid flow showing a plurality of transducer elements,
such as heaters, ultrasound generators, etc. embedded in the wall surface;
Fig. 6 is a nominal time diagram showing the manner in which the various transducers
are timewise activated;
Fig. 7 is a plan view of the fluid flow field shown in Fig. 5 showing a nominal distribution
of disturbances introduced into the fluid flow by reason of the timewise activation
of the transducers in accordance with the diagram shown in Fig. 6;
Fig. 8 is a plan view of a test section of a wind tunnel showing a sonic generator
attached to one side of the test section; and
Fig. 9 is a side view of the test section showing the slit by which a sonic disturbance
is introduced into turbulent flow in the test section.
Detailed Description
[0015] Recent and as yet unpublished research has focused on modifying and managing turbulent
flow by modification of the triggering modes. In a series of computer stimulations,
turbulent flow driven down a channel with fixed walls has been considered. During
the course of the simulations, distortion was applied to selectively chosen triggering
modes. The randomization of the phases of the motion was chosen as the means of distortion.
In effect, this suppressed long wave motions. There is nothing special about the method
of phase randomization; and other distortion methods would work as well. It was found
that by randomizing the phases of just the long wavelength propagating modes, the
flow rate was increased by more than 30%. Associated with this effect is an indication
that drag reductions of more than 40% can be achieved. The randomization of modes
other than the long wavelength modes produced little or no effect. On the other hand,
enhancement of the amplitudes of the long wavelength propagating modes substantially
increases turbulent mixing. This provides strong substantiation that the interaction
of the wave and roll modes are fundamental to the bursting mechanism.
[0016] Referring now to the drawings, reference numeral 10 designates a wall-bounded turbulent
flow field including wall 12 restraining fluid 13 containing local structures in the
form of counter-rotating rolls 14, 16 of fluid. The axes of these rolls, or streaks
as they are sometimes called, lie in the direction of fluid flow which is into the
paper showing Fig. 1, and as indicated by arrow 17 in Fig. 2. Details of the nature
of these rolls are contained in reference (1), Fig. 10, page 2223. Briefly, these
counter rotating rolls have diameters that are a function of the strength of the flow,
and a length much greater than their diameters (in excess of 1000

). As indicated above, the dominant roll diameter is roughly 100

or 200

per pair.
[0017] In fully developed turbulent flow, these local roll structures travel downstream
through-out the near wall region, are disrupted, contort, and finally burst. It is
the interaction between the coherent structure of propagating modes present in the
flow with the coherent structure of the rolls that result in the bursting of the rolls,
and the consequent mixing of slow moving fluid near the boundary with rapidly moving
fluid in the main flow and vice versa.
[0018] The present invention provides both passive and active mechanisms for controlling
the triggering aspects of the wave propagating modes which cause bursting of the roll-modes
in turbulent wall-bounded flows. A passive mechanism, according to the present invention,
for controlling the wave propagation modes is the presence of shape modifications,
such as grooves, undulations, etc. on the walls containing the turbulent flow. For
example, the shape modifications can be achieved by actually grooving the walls, or
by applying to the walls an adhesive layer which contains the required shapes. When
the shape modification is in the form of undulations, their amplitude should be in
the range 15-20 wall units in order to include the location of peak turbulence production.
The wavelength or pitch of typical undulations will depend on the objective of the
turbulence management. The orientation of the undulations, i.e., the direction of
the troughs between the peaks of the undulations, should be inclined at about 15-30°
off the streamwise direction. That is to say, the "propagation" direction of the undulations
should be about 60-75° from the streamwise direction.
[0019] Fig. 2 shows a plan view of rolls 14, 16; and superimposed on these rolls are waves
that propagate (the propagating modes) whose direction is indicated by arrow 18 making
an angle ±ϑ with the flow direction 17. As indicated above, ϑ lies in the range 50-80°
for the waves having the dominant energy content. To account for the possible bidirectional
angle of the propagating modes, the undulations are preferably in the form of herring-bone
pattern 20 as shown in Fig. 2, or a complete cross-hatched or "knurled" pattern.
[0020] In order to enhance mixing and, for example, increase heat transport, (i.e., increase
turbulence), and therefore to encourage the eruption of bursts, the undulations should
be ordered in a strictly sinusoidal pattern as indicated in Fig. 3. The wavelength
p is preferably in the range 100-300 wall units in order to achieve resonance with
the triggering modes, and the amplitude
a is preferably in the range 15-20 wall units.
[0021] In order to reduce drag, the undulations should be given a pattern that introduces
phase interference in the waves in a manner that is analogous to the above-mentioned
phase randomization. One method for achieving this is by creating a "chaotic" pattern
modulation by the resonant wavelength, and containing a suitable sum of incommensurate
sinusoids ranging down in wavelength. A model cross-sectional plot is given in Fig.
4.
[0022] In addition to the use of passive mechanisms for interacting with the wave propagation
modes to control turbulence, the present invention also contemplates the use of active
devices for this purpose. Embodiment 30, shown in Fig. 5, is an example of an active
device. As shown, flush mounted wall transducers in the form of heating elements 31,
32, etc. are activated by transducer control 33 in the form of a heater control. The
operation of heater control 33 is to pulse the heaters in time-sequence to effect
local heating of the fluid in the same patterns as those generated by the undulations
in the wall surface of the bounded flow. Thus, the localized heating will create wave
patterns of varying densities which either inhibit or enhance the bursting activity.
[0023] Control modes 33 may activate the heaters in sequence as shown in Fig. 6 providing
a spatial distribution of disturbances as indicated in Fig. 7. Wave modes, or patterns,
which introduce phase interference in the wave modes can be established by the thermal
patterns in a fashion analogies to that of the undulations described above.
[0024] Both of the above described mechanisms effect control over the triggering mechanisms,
and are suitable for steadystate flow conditions. In both instances, the placement
of the patterns is fixed, whether by surface modification or by appropriate positioning
and pulsing of heat elements. The fixed pattern is prescribed by condition of the
flow as specified by its parameters (e.g., the Reynolds number).
[0025] Other applications effect control over turbulence under variable flow conditions.
Wall-mounted heating elements can be mounted in bands perpendicular to the flow direction.
These elements can be triggered subsequently in time in order to create an oblique
wave of any angle. By suitably triggering, or pulsing a grid of heating elements,
any pattern of activity can be established to either enhance or diminish the bursting
phenomenon. This will allow the application of these considerations to cases where
there is a variable flow rate (i.e., a variable Reynolds number).
[0026] Phase randomization, on the one hand, and phase enhancement, on the other hand, of
the disturbances introduced into the fluid flow, can also be achieved by means of
sound wave generation either with wall-mounted acoustic generators or with externally
mounted sound generators positioned as indicated by the transducers in Fig. 5. Phase
enhancement of the triggering modes leading to increased mixing of the fluid flow
may be established through the standing wave patterns. Asynchronous sound generation,
resulting in patterns described above in connection with the undulated surface, can
be created by suitably driving arrays of acoustic generators. Variable flow rates
can be treated by suitable programming of the acoustic drivers.
[0027] The same effect of phase randomization, or enhancement of triggering modes, can be
achieved by wall mounted vibration transducers producing vibrations of the wall in
an appropriate pattern, with consequent transmission of the vibrations into the flow.
The sound or acoustic generators, or vibration transducers, may be mounted as arrays
at the side walls of a duct, or on the circumference of a pipe, or on the wall(s)
of other wall-bounded flow.
[0028] The present invention can also be carried out in a wall-bounded fluid flow system
wherein the fluid is electrically conductive as, for example, seat water. In such
case, the disturbance can be introduced by a varying magnetic or electro-magnetic
field associated with, or adjacent to, the wall(s) in order to introduce the desired
disturbance, or to effect changes, in the propagating structures or modes in the manner
previously described.
[0029] The present invention is particularly applicable to ducts, curved ducts, pipes, curved
pipes, compressors, pumps, and turbines so as to reduce turbulence. The invention
is also applicable to combustion chambers in internal combustion engines, and the
like, such that mixing in the chambers is enhanced to promote combustion.
[0030] If the turbulent fluid is electrically conducting, even weakly conducting, as in
the case of seawater, electrical means are available for establishing the wave patterns
discussed thus far. Wall-mounted electrodes positioned as shown by the transducer
in Fig. 5 can be used to set up currents which can be used for local heating, or coupled
to magnetic fields, to establish local forces. These can be used to manage the appropriate
wave patterns discussed above. Finally, wall-mounted strain gauges, pressure gauges,
thermocouples, or any other fine scale measuring devices, can be used to detect the
onset of the triggering propagating waves. These signals can be used in a feedback
loop with a thermal, acoustic, or electrical scheme either to selectably enhance or
to destroy the evolving triggering propagating modes.
[0031] While the present invention is disclosed herein in relation to turbulent flow in
wall-bounded fluid flow fields, the above described methods and apparatus of the present
invention can be used in turbulent boundary flows such as occur adjacent bodies moving
in a fluid. Thus, the invention is applicable to bodies moving in air (e.g., wheeled
vehicles on the ground, and aircraft), and bodies moving in water (e.g. ships), etc.
[0032] In addition, with the above described method and apparatus, the present invention
also can be carried out in a boundary layer flow system wherein the fluid is electrically
conductive as, for example, sea water. In such case, the disturbance can be introduced
by a varying magnetic or electro-magnetic field associated with, or adjacent to, a
body such as a vessel being operated in sea water, in order to introduce the desired
disturbance, or to effect changes in the propagating structures or modes in the manner
previously described.
[0033] In an actual physical experiment, a substantial reduction (9%) in turbulent drag
was observed when a relatively weak sound generator was used to introduce a sonic
disturbance within the test section of a wind tunnel. Fig. 8 shows the relationship
between a sonic resonator used in the experiment and the test section. As indicated,
the test section of the wind tunnel was about 57 cm high x 81 cm wide, and had a length
of about 380 cm. A sound generator was attached to the side of the test section at
an angle of about 65°. The sound generator was in the form of a resonator box having
a tapered section about 22 cm long and measuring about 61 x 22 cm at one end, to which
a loud speaker was attached, and about 8 x 61 cm at the end opposite the speaker.
Attached to the tapered section was linear section having a length of about 42 cm
on one side and a length of about 72 cm on the opposite side. The free end of the
linear section was blocked off to produce a slit 1 cm high x 61 cm long. The slit
was positioned in alignment with a wall of the test section.
[0034] Measurements were made using a straight hot wire at two points 30 cm apart near a
wall of the test section. One of the points coincided with the axis of the resonator
box and was located about 190 cm into the test section.
[0035] At the axis point, the turbulent boundary layer thickness was 48 mm for flow with
a Reynolds number of 7.7x10⁵ based on the free stream velocity. A drag reduction of
about 9% was obtained with the loud speaker driven by an amplifier that produced an
audio signal whose driving frequency was about 170 Hz, with its phase randomized in
the range 0-360
o at 426 Hz, in accordance with a study reported in "Drag Reduction in Turbulent Channel
Flow by Phase Randomization" by A.R. Handler, E. Levich, and L. Sirovich,
Phys. Fluids. The frequencies, or the wavelengths, used in the acoustic disturbance introduced
into the test section was in accordance with those specified in the present invention,
namely in the range 100-300

(where

is a wall unit).
[0036] The advantages and improved results furnished by the method and apparatus of the
present invention are apparent from the foregoing description of the preferred embodiment
of the invention. Various changes and modifications may be made without departing
from the scope of the invention as described in the appended claims.
1. A method for controlling turbulence in a wall-bounded fluid flow field having a turbulent
wall region characterized by a system of roll pairs or streaks whose diameter is functionally
related to the strength of the flow, and which extend in the direction of flow, and
by propagating structures of coherent patterns that propagate in the direction of
flow at a substantially constant group speed, said method including locally introducing
into the turbulent wall region a disturbance field whose amplitude, wavelength, and
direction of propagation are such that the disturbance is strongly coupled to and
modifies the propagating structures in a manner that increases or decreases the interaction
of the propagating structures with the system of roll pairs thereby locally increasing
or decreasing the turbulence in the flow field.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the wavelength of the disturbance field is
comparable to the roll size.
3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the lateral extent of the disturbance is comparable
to the roll size.
4. A method according to claim 2, wherein the disturbance field contains a modulation
at the resonant wavelength in the range 100-300

, and contains a sum of incommensurate sinusoids of decreasing wavelengths.
5. A method according to claim 4, wherein the amplitude of the disturbance is in the
range 15-20

.
6. A method according to claim 2, wherein the amplitude of the disturbance is modulated
in time or space.
7. A method according to claim 2, wherein the disturbance is effected by an undulated
surface on the wall bounding the flow, the direction of the undulations being inclined
relative to the direction of fluid flow.
8. A method according to claim 7, wherein the wavelength of said surface is comparable
to the roll size.
9. A method according to claim 8, wherein the modulating wavelength is in the range 100-300

, where

is a wall unit, and composed of incommensurate sinusoids of decreasing wavelength.
10. A method according to claim 9, wherein the amplitude of the undulations in said surface
varies according to a repetitive pattern.
11. Apparatus for controlling turbulence in fluid flow comprising:
(a) a wall for bounding the fluid flow which has a turbulent wall region characterized
by roll pairs extending in the direction of fluid flow, and propagating structures
interacting with the roll pairs; and
(b) means associated with the wall for introducing into the wall region a disturbance
whose amplitude, wavelength, and direction of propagation are such that the disturbance
is coupled to the propagating structures to a degree that modifies of said propagating
structures for the purpose of changing the interaction of the propagating structures
with the roll pairs thereby increasing turbulent mixing or decreasing the turbulent
drag.
12. Apparatus according to claim 11, wherein said means associated with the wall include
periodic undulations having peaks and troughs.
13. Apparatus according to claim 12, wherein said undulations form a herring bone pattern
on the wall.
14. Apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the amplitude of the peaks varies periodically
in a direction perpendicular to the extent of said undulations.
15. Apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the amplitude of the peaks varies aperiodically
in a direction perpendicular to the extent of said undulations.
16. Apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the peaks vary periodically.
17. Apparatus according to claim 12, wherein said means associated with the wall include
an array of transducers arranged in a direction perpendicular to the direction of
flow, and means for periodically or aperiodically exciting the transducers in timed
sequence.
18. Apparatus according to claim 17, wherein said transducers are heaters for heating
the fluid when the heaters are excited.
19. Apparatus according to claim 17, wherein said transducers are ultrasound transducers
for introducing sonic bursts into the flow when an ultrasonic transducers is excited.
20. Apparatus according to claim 11, wherein said means associated with the wall include
aperiodic undulations having peaks and troughs.
21. Apparatus according to claim 12, wherein said undulations form a knurled pattern on
the wall.
22. Apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the peaks vary aperiodically.
23. A method according to claim 7, wherein the direction of the undulations lie in the
range 50-80° relative to the direction of flow.
24. A method according to claim 1 wherein the amplitude of the disturbance is much smaller
than the size of the rolls.
25. A method according to claim 24 wherein said amplitude is in the range of approximately
10-20 wall units, where a wall unit is m/(sr)0.5, m being the viscosity of the fluid, s being the average frictional stress in the
fluid at the wall, and r being the density of the fluid.
26. A method according to claim 24 wherein the wavelength of said disturbance is comparable
to the size of the rolls.
27. A method according to claim 26 wherein said wavelength is in the range 100-300 wall
units, where a wall unit is m/(sr)0.5, m being the viscosity of the fluid, s being the average frictional stress in the
fluid at the wall, and r being the density of the fluid.
28. A method according to claim 25 wherein the wavelength of said disturbance is comparable
to the size of the rolls.
29. A method according to claim 28 wherein said wavelength is in the range 100-300 wall
units, where a wall unit is m/(sr)0.5, m being the viscosity of the fluid, s being the average frictional stress in the
fluid at the wall, and r being the density of the fluid.
30. A method according to claim 29 wherein the direction of propagation of the disturbance
is within the range of about 50-80o of the direction of flow.
31. A method according to claim 27 wherein the direction of propagation of the disturbance
is within the range of about 50-80o of the direction of flow.
32. Apparatus according to claim 17 wherein said transducers are acoustic generators for
introducing said disturbance into the flow when the generators are excited.
33. Apparatus according to claim 17 wherein said transducers are vibration transducers
for introducing said disturbance into the flow when the transducers are excited.