FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention pertains to air-fuel combustion processes.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The vast majority of combustion processes use air as an oxidizer in combustion with
a fuel such as natural gas, fuel oil, propane, waste oils, other hydrocarbons and
the like. It is also known that the performance of many air-fuel combustion processes
can be improved by enriching the combustion air with oxygen. Enrichment of the combustion
air increases both the flame temperature and the thermal efficiency while the flue
gas volume decreases as the oxygen concentration in the air or oxidizer increases.
The cost of high purity oxygen for enrichment can be offset by gains in productivity
from the enhanced combustion. Low level enrichment of up to 35% total oxygen content
in the oxidizer can generally be retrofitted to existing air-fuel systems with few
modifications.
[0003] Recently, the environmental impact of combustion processes has received a great deal
of attention. It has been shown that the nitrogen oxides, known as NOx, are detrimental
to the environment by producing smog, acid rain, and ozone in the lower atmosphere,
the latter being a cause of global warming. In the United States the new Clean Air
Act signifies the commitment of the Federal Government toward controlling pollution.
The new regulations have spurred an increased interest in controlling NOx formation
as a result of combusting air-fuel mixtures.
[0004] It is also known that low level oxygen enrichment in combustion can cause a dramatic
increase in NOx emissions. In industrial combustion processes, over 90% of the NOx
emissions are in the form of a nitric oxide or NO. It has also been shown that at
high levels of oxygen enrichment, e.g. above 90% total oxygen content in the oxidizer,
less NOx is produced than using air for the same firing rate. However, high levels
of oxygen enrichment can be uneconomical in a given process and in fact may produce
materials problems also.
[0005] In the past, two strategies have been used to reduce NOx omissions. The first is
to remove the NOx from the exhaust gases before they exit into the atmosphere. Post-treatment
of the exhaust gases from the combustion process can be carried out by selective catalytic
or non-catalytic reduction and various combinations of oxidation, absorption and reduction
processes to scrub out the NOx. These processes generally involve high cost and a
need to shut down the combustion process in the event of failure with the post-treatment
equipment. The second method or strategy is to minimize NOx formation in the first
place by modifying the combustion process in some manner. Examples of this second
strategy include water or steam injection into the flame, reduced excess air in the
combustion process and so-called low NOx burner designs. These technologies provide
the user with a penalty in reduced thermal efficiency or only minimal NOx reductions.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] The present invention provides a method of utilizing oxy-fuel combustion in combination
with an existing air-fuel system to increase productivity while minimizing NOx formation.
The oxy-fuel combustion is shielded by the air-fuel combustion and the oxy-fuel combustion
is controlled so that the combustion takes place in a fuel-rich state.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[0007] Figure 1 is a plot of pounds of NO produced per million BTUs against the percent
oxygen in the oxidizer of a typical combustion process.
[0008] Figure 2 is a longitudinal schematic of an apparatus used to verify the process of
the present invention.
[0009] Figure 3 is a plot of pounds of NO per million BTU produced against the percentage
of the total combustion process that was from a source of oxy-fuel combustion.
[0010] Figure 4 is a plot of pounds of NO per million BTU produced against oxygen concentration
in the oxidizer for the test results of Figure 3.
[0011] Figure 5 is a plot of pounds NO per million BTU produced against total oxygen in
the oxidizer for three different oxygen-fuel ratios as predicted assuming the fuel
and oxidizer are perfectly mixed and react adiabatically.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
[0012] The problem as stated above with utilizing oxygen enrichment in combustion is that
there is a dramatic increase in NOx emissions. In most industrial combustion processes,
over 90% of the NOx emissions are in the form of nitric oxide or NO. Figure 1 shows
the equilibrium predictions for NO for an adiabatic, stoichiometric, methane flame
as a function of the oxygen concentration in an oxygen-nitrogen oxidizer, e.g. air.
The units for nitric oxide or NO are pounds of NO per million BTUs gross firing rate
of the fuel. Figure 1 shows that NO dramatically increases at low levels of oxygen
enrichment which trend has been verified experimentally in numerous tests conducted
with enrichment of conventional air-fuel burners. Economics, process considerations
and materials limitations more often than not make high levels of oxygen enrichment
impractical, even though the high levels of enrichment produced less NOx than air
for the same firing rate. In accord with the present invention, the process is most
easily achieved by retrofitting an oxygen-fuel burner to an existing air-fuel system
to increase productivity while minimizing NOx formation. As shown in Figure 2, dual
fuel air-fuel burner shown generally as 10 includes a first atomizing air passage
12 in the form of a tubular shape with an air inlet fitting 14 disposed concentrically
around the first air tube is a fuel tube 16 having a fuel inlet 18 the fuel tube 16
being surrounded on its forward end with a concentric tube which defines a main combustion
air inlet tube 20 with a combustion air inlet passage 22. On the forward end of the
burner 10 is a burner mounting flange 24 containing a burner tile 26, the burner tile
being fabricated of a ceramic material. The forward end of the main combustion air
passage 20 terminates in a plate 28 with a plurality of air passages 30 disposed on
axes parallel to longitudinal axis of the fuel passage 32 which is in the form of
an annulus disposed around the annular termination of the atomizing air passage 34.
Disposed concentrically within air passage 12 is an oxy-fuel burner shown generally
as 36. Oxy-fuel burner 36 is a concentric tube burner having an outer tube 38 concentrically
disposed around an inner tube 40. The inner tube is spaced from the outer tube by
a plurality of radially spaced spacers 42 proximate the front end 44 of the burner.
The oxy-fuel burner is adapted so that in one embodiment, fuel is admitted through
a fitting 46 and is conducted around the outside of the inner tube 40 and exits the
front end of the burner 44. Oxygen is conducted down the center or oxidizer tube 40
by means of an oxidizer inlet fitting 48. Oxidizer tube 40 terminates at a location
inwardly of the discharge end of the burner 36 so that proper combustion of the oxy-fuel
mixture can take place. Alternatively, the oxygen and fuel passages can be reversed.
Concentric oxy-fuel burners are well known in the art, one being a K-Tech burner offered
for sale by Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. of Allentown, Pennsylvania.
[0013] In operation the burner 10 is set up so that natural gas is delivered through fitting
18 and primary combustion air delivered through fitting 22 so that combustion takes
place forward of the front end of the oxy-fuel burner 36. The oxy-fuel burner is used
to produce an oxy-fuel flame or combustion at the forward end 44 of the burner 36
by introducing oxygen into fitting 46 and fuel such as natural gas into fitting 48.
In order to minimize the production of NOx, the oxy-fuel burner is operated in a fuel-rich
condition. Fuel-rich is taken to mean an equivalence ratio between 1.2 and 1.35 preferably
at about 1.33 when the ratio of the oxygen in the oxy-fuel burner to the fuel is divided
into the ratio of oxygen and the oxy-fuel burner as if the oxy-fuel burner were operating
under conditions of stoichiometry. Furthermore, operation is conducted so that the
oxy-fuel flame is shrouded by the air-fuel flame. In the device of Figure 2 this is
easily accomplished by placing the oxy-fuel burner inside of the air-fuel burner so
that the oxy-fuel combustion takes place inside of an envelope of the air-fuel combustion.
Other configurations can be utilized wherein the oxy-fuel flame is separate from the
air-fuel flame except that the two flames are merged after creation.
[0014] By way of explanation it is well known that running a flame fuel-rich reduces NOx
production because of the reduction in flame temperature and the reduced amount of
available oxygen radicals. Due to the fact that there is not enough oxygen to fully
oxidize the fuel, the maximum flame temperature is never achieved. In addition, thermodynamically
the oxygen preferentially combines with carbon and hydrogen before combining with
nitrogen to form nitrogen oxides. However, unburned hydrocarbon emissions increase
under fuel-rich conditions which conditions are environmentally unacceptable and the
overall thermal efficiency of the combustion process is reduced.
[0015] An actual test with the set up of Figure 2, high purity oxygen (e.g. 99% O₂) was
used in the oxy-fuel burner and natural gas containing better than 95% methane and
0.32% nitrogen by volume was used for the fuel. As shown in Figure 3, the X axis shows
how much of the total firing rate was created by using an oxy-fuel combustion supplement.
For example, at 50% oxy-fuel, half the total firing rate was oxy-fuel and half was
air-fuel. The equivalence ratio of the oxy-fuel burner was varied from 1.00 to 1.33
where 1.0 is the stoichiometric ratio for methane. In Figure 3 where no oxy-fuel (0%
oxy-fuel) was used, the air-fuel equivalence ratio was varied. These curves show a
dramatic decline in NO as the oxy-fuel flame became more fuel-rich. The curves also
show that there will be peaks in the middle ranges of oxy-fuel supplementation, however,
the precise peaks were not determined during these experimental runs.
[0016] Figure 4 shows the same data that was plotted in Figure 3 except that the data is
presented in the terms of overall oxygen concentration in the oxidizer so the test
can be evaluated as if the oxygen was premixed with the air. For example, if the total
firing rate is split evenly between the air-fuel and the oxygen-fuel burners and both
burners are at stoichiometric conditions, the equivalent oxygen concentration for
oxygen premixed with air is 34.6%. This curve is instructive because it can be readily
compared to the theoretical NOx curves shown in Figure 5. The curves of Figure 5 are
the equilibrium predictions assuming fuel and oxidizer are perfectly mixed. The curves
of Figure 5 shows that NOx is predicted to increase as the oxygen enrichment level
increases toward 40%. However, the experimental data of Figure 3 shows the NOx declines
as enrichment goes from 30-40%. It is believed that this is due to separate flame
zones that are created by inserting an oxy-fuel burner into an air-fuel burner. A
conventional oxy-fuel burner would have a high flame temperature.
[0017] The curves shown in the drawing are based on gross firing rate and do not include
the effect of increased efficiency with more oxygen. This effectively lowers NOx even
further if it is measured on a basis of (pounds) lbs NO/
net MMBTu.
[0018] The air-fuel burner tested had unusually low NOx because of its poor mixing characteristics.
Most air-fuel burners are >0.1 lb NO/MMBtu which means the invention may be even better
for other burners.
[0019] By running the oxy-fuel burner fuel-rich the flame temperature is dramatically reduced.
In addition, the natural gas in the outer annulus of the oxy-fuel burner acts as a
shroud which delays the inner high purity oxygen from reaching the nitrogen in the
air-fuel burner. Since the flame is fuel-rich, most of the oxygen oxidizes the hydrocarbon
fuel before it mixes with the air-fuel stream. It is believed that the combination
of lower flame temperature, reducing conditions in the oxy-fuel flame temperature
and shrouding of the inner high purity oxygen from the nitrogen in the air-fuel flame
all contribute to the unexpected reduction of NOx in the exhaust gases. From the experimental
data one could predict that the preferred conditions would occur when at least two
thirds of the total firing rate is accomplished by virtue of using the oxy-fuel burner.
In view of the experimental data and the conclusions reached above, the preferred
operating conditions are running the oxy-fuel flame fuel-rich and the air-fuel flame
approximately at stoichiometric conditions rather than the reverse. Using conditions
reverse to the invention would only marginally reduce the flame temperature of the
air-fuel flame and drastically increase the flame temperature of the oxy-fuel flame.
In view of the fact that thermal NOx production in flames increases exponentially
with temperature, the high peak flame temperatures that would result in the reverse
practice of the invention would produce higher NOx than the invention. Although running
both burners fuel-rich would reduce NOx, the thermal efficiency would suffer. Since
oxygen enrichment has been proven to increase thermal efficiency, the present invention
would enhance productivity even though the oxy-fuel flame is fuel rich because the
reduction from being fuel-rich is far outweighed by oxygen enrichment. In most industrial
furnaces, unburned hydrocarbon emissions will not be present due to air infiltration
into the furnace and into the exhaust system which combusts any remaining fuel in
the exhaust gases leaving the flame zone.
[0020] The present invention can be easily retrofitted to existing systems at minimal cost.
The present invention gives an incremental increase in productivity without the penalty
of high NOx emissions which normally occur at low levels of oxygen enrichment. Oxy-fuel
burners have previously been added to air-fuel furnaces to increase productivity,
however, prior to the present discovery NOx emissions were not considered to be a
problem.
[0021] Having thus described our invention what is desired to be secured by Letters Patent
of the United States is set forth in the appended claims.
1. A method of reducing nitrogen oxides levels produced during the combustion of an air-fuel
mixture comprising the steps of:
(a) combusting an oxy-fuel mixture in a manner to utilize the air fuel mixture to
shield the oxy-fuel combustion from nitrogen during combustion; and
(b) maintaining the oxy-fuel mixture in a fuel rich condition during the entire combustion
process.
2. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the process is operated so that the oxy-fuel
combustion provides between 50 and 90% of the total heat generated by the combustion
process.
3. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the stoichiometric conditions in the oxy-fuel
combustion is maintained at an equivalence ratio between 1.2 and 1.35.
4. A method according to Claim 1 wherein said oxy-fuel combustion takes place concentrically
inside of the air-fuel combustion.
5. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the fuel in the oxy-fuel burner is selected
from the group consisting of methane, propane, fuel oil, waste oil, hydrocarbon fuels
and mixtures thereof.
6. A method according to Claim 5 wherein the ratio of oxygen to fuel is 1.5 part oxygen
to 1 part methane.
7. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the fuel for both the air-fuel and oxy-fuel
combustion is selected from the group consisting of methane, propane, fuel oil, waste
oil, hydrocarbon fuels and mixtures thereof.
8. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the fuel for the air-fuel combustion is oil
and the fuel for the oxy-fuel combustion is methane.
9. A method according to Claim 1 wherein said process is carried out by inserting an
oxy-fuel burner concentrically within an air-fuel burner.
10. A method according to Claim 1 wherein said process is carried out by inserting an
oxy-fuel burner in the process apparatus in a manner to inject oxy-fuel combustion
products into the air-fuel combustion.