[0001] The present invention relates to methods for inhibiting the deposition of organic
contaminants. More particularly, it relates to inhibiting such deposition from pulp
in pulp and papermaking systems and from secondary fiber during repulping.
[0002] The deposition of organic contaminants in the pulp and paper industry can cause both
quality and efficiency problems in pulp and papermaking systems. Some components occur
naturally in wood and are released during various pulping and papermaking processes.
The term "pitch" can be used to refer to deposits composed of organic constituents
which may originate from these natural resins, their salts, as well as coating binders,
sizing agents, and defoaming chemicals which may be found in the pulp. In addition,
pitch frequently contains inorganic components such as calcium carbonate, talc, clays,
titanium, and related materials.
[0003] Stickies is a term that has become increasingly used to describe deposits that occur
in systems using recycled fibre. These deposits often contain the same material found
in "pitch" deposits in addition to adhesives, hot melts, waxes, and inks. All of the
aforementioned materials have many common characteristics including: hydrophobicity,
deformability, tackiness, low surface energy, and the potential to cause problems
with deposition, quality, and efficiency in the process. Diagram 1 shows the complex
relationnship between pitch and stickies discussed here.
Diagram 1
[0004]
| |
Pitch |
Stickies |
| Natural Resins (fatty and resin acids, fatty esters, insoluble salts, sterols, etc.) |
X |
X |
| Defoamers (oil, EBS*, silicate, silicone oils, ethoxylated compounds, etc.) |
X |
X |
| Sizing Agents (Rosin size, ASA*, AKD*, hydrolysis products insoluble salts, etc.) |
X |
X |
| Coating Binders (PVAC*, SBR*) |
X |
X |
| Waxes |
|
X |
| Inks |
|
X |
| Hot Melts (EVA*, PVAC*, etc) |
|
X |
| Contact Adhesives (SBR*, vinyl acrylates, polyisoprene, etc.) |
|
X |
*
EBS Ethylene bis stearamide
ASA alkenyl succinic anhydride
AKD alkyl ketene dimer
PVAC polyvinyl acetate
SBR styrene butadiene rubber
EVA ethylene vinyl acetate |
[0005] The deposition of organic contaminants can be detrimental to the efficiency of a
pulp or paper mill causing both reduced quality and reduced operating efficiency.
Organic contaminants can deposit on process equipment in papermaking systems resulting
in operational difficulties in the systems. The deposition of organic contaminants
on consistency regulators and other instrument probes can render these components
useless. Deposits on screens can reduce throughput and upset operation of the system.
This deposition can occur not only on metal surfaces in the system, but also on plastic
and synthetic surfaces such as machine wires, felts, foils, Uhle boxes and headbox
components.
[0006] Historically, the subsets of the organic deposit problems, "pitch" and "stickies"
have manifested themselves separately, differently and have been treated distinctly
and separately. From a physical standpoint, "pitch" deposits have usually formed from
microscopic particles of adhesive material (natural or man-made) in the stock which
accumulate on papermaking or pulping equipment. These deposits can readily be found
on stock chest walls, paper machine foils, Uhle boxes, paper machine wires, wet press
felts, dryer felts, dryer cans, and calendar stacks. The difficulties related to these
deposits included direct interference with the efficiency of the contaminated surface,
therefore, reduced production, as well as holes, dirt, and other sheet defects that
reduce the quality and usefulness of the paper for operations that follow like coating,
converting, or printing.
[0007] From a physical standpoint, "stickies" have usually been particles of visible or
nearly visible size in the stock which originate from the recycled fiber. These deposits
tend to accumulate on many of the same surfaces that "pitch" can be found on and cause
many of the same difficulties that "pitch" can cause. The most severe "stickies" related
deposits however tend to be found on paper machine wires, wet felts, dryer felts,
and dryer cans.
[0008] Methods of preventing the build up of deposits on the pulp and papermill equipment
and surfaces are of great importance to the industry. The paper machines could be
shut down for cleaning, but ceasing operation for cleaning is undesirable because
of the consequential loss of productivity, poor quality while partially contaminated
and "dirt" which occurs when deposits break off and become incorporated in the sheet.
Preventing deposition is thus greatly preferred where it can be effectively practiced.
[0009] In the past stickies deposits and pitch deposits have typically manifested themselves
in different systems. This was true because mills usually used only virgin fiber or
only recycled fiber. Often very different treatment chemicals and strategies were
used to control these separate problems.
[0010] Current trends are for increased mandatory use of recycled fiber in all systems.
This is resulting in a co-occurance of stickies and pitch problems in a given mill.
It is desirable to find treatment chemicals and strategies which will be highly effective
at eliminating both of these problems without having to feed two or more separate
chemicals. The materials of this invention have clearly shown their ability to achieve
this goal.
[0011] Pitch control agents of commerce have historically included surfactants, which when
added to the system, can stabilize the dispersion of the pitch in the furnish and
white water. Stabilization can help prevent the pitch from precipitating out on wires
and felts.
[0012] Mineral additives such as talc have also found use and can reduce the tacky nature
of pitch by adsorbing finely dispersed pitch particles on their surfaces. This will
reduce the degree to which the particles coagulate or agglomerate.
[0013] Polyphosphates have been used to try to maintain the pitch in a finely dispersed
state. Alum has also been widely used to reduce deposition of pitch and related problems.
[0014] Both chemical and non-chemical approaches to stickies control are employed by papermakers.
Non-chemical approaches include furnish selection, screening and cleaning, and thermal/mechanical
dispersion units.
[0015] Chemical treatment techniques for stickies control include dispersion, detackification,
wire passivation and cationic fixation. Chemicals used included talc, polymers, dispersants
and surfactants.
[0016] Surfactants, anionic polymers and copolymers of anionic monomers and hydrophobic
monomers have been used extensively to prevent pitch deposition of metal soap and
other resinous pitch components. See "Pulp and Paper", by James P. Casey, Vol. II,
2nd Edition, pp.1096-7.
[0017] US-A- 4 871 424, (Dreisbach et al., October 1989) teaches the use of polyvinyl alcohol
and copolymers of vinyl alcohol to inhibit pitch deposition from pulp in paper-making
systems.
[0018] US-A- 3 081 219, (Drennan et al., March 1963) teaches the use of a polymeric N-vinyl
lactam to control pitch in the making of paper for sulfite pulps.
[0019] US-A- 3 154 466, (Nothum, October 1964), teaches the use of xylene sulfonic acid-formaldehyde
condensates and salts thereof as pitch dispersants in papermaking.
[0020] USA- 3 992 249, (Farley, November 1976) discloses the use of certain anionic vinyl
polymers carrying hydrophobic-oleophilic and anionic hydrophilic substituents when
added prior to the beating operation in the range of about 0.5 parts to 100 parts
by weight of the fibrous suspension to inhibit the deposition of adhesive pitch particles
on the surfaces of pulp-mill equipment.
[0021] US-A- 4 846 933, (Dreisbach et al., July 1989) teaches the use of a water soluble
polymer containing polymerized units of methyl vinyl ether having methyl ether groups
to control pitch deposition from pulp.
[0022] US-A- 4 822 452, (Tse et al., April 1989) teaches the use of urethane block copolymers,
as nonionic associative thickeners. These copolymers act as thickeners in the preparation
of a fibrous web of textile length fibres.
[0023] "The Influences of washing, defoamers and dispersants on pitch deposition from unbleached
Kraft pulps", N. Dunlop-Jones and L.H. Allen, Journal of Pulp and Paper Science: Vol.
15 No. 6, November 1989 teaches the use of nonylphenol ethoxylate compounds to inhibit
pitch deposition in papermaking systems.
[0024] US-A- 4 781 794, (Moreland, November 1988) teaches methods for detackifying adhesive
materials contained in secondary fibre. The methods comprise adding an unsubstituted
methyl ether cellulose derivative to the secondary fibre. Methyl cellulose is a representative
compound.
[0025] US-A- 4 886 575, (Moreland, December 1989) teaches the use of polyvinyl alcohol to
inhibit the deposition and adherence of stickies to the repulping equipment.
[0026] US-A- 4 923 566, (Shawki et al., May 1990) teaches methods for pacifying stickies
by applying urea between the drying rolls and the finished produce reel.
[0027] US-A- 4 643 800, (Maloney et al., February 1987) teaches removing and dispersing
contaminant from secondary fibre during repulping. Nonionic surfactants and dispersants
are used to separate the contaminant from the fibre.
[0028] According to the present invention there is provided a method for inhibiting the
deposition of organic contaminants from pulp in pulp and papermaking systems which
comprises treating the pulp and papermaking systems with a hydrophobically modified
associative polymer.
[0029] According to the present invention there is also provided a method for inhibiting
the deposition of organic contaminants from secondary fiber during repulping which
comprises treating the secondary fiber with a hydrophobically modified associative
polymer.
[0030] These associative polymers act to inhibit the deposition when adsorbed onto contaminants
or contaminant prone surfaces. Common organic contaminants include constituents which
occur in the pulp (virgin, recycle or combinations) having the potential to deposit
and reduce paper machine performance or paper quality. This will include natural resins
such as, for example as fatty acids, resin acids, their insoluble salts, fatty esters,
sterols and other organic constituents, like ethylene bis-stearamide, waxes, sizing
agents, adhesives, hot melts, inks, defoamers, and latexes that may be found to deposit
in papermaking systems.
[0031] This inhibition may be achieved by continuous or batch addition to the stock (virgin,
recycled and/or combination) prior to the site of concern or by continuous application
directly to the site of primary contamination (i.e. the wire) prior to the accumulation
of the deposit. The term hydrophobically associative polymer relates to polymers which
have two or more hydrophobic regions giving them the capacity to form associative
networks by the attraction/interaction of the hydrophobic regions.
[0032] Hydrophobically associating water-soluble polymers possess unusual rheological characteristics
which are thought to arise from the intermolecular association of neighbouring hydrophobic
substituents. The hydrophobic substituents are incorporated onto the polymer through
chemical grafting or a suitable co-polymerization procedure. The hydrophobic groups
are incorporated to a level so as to not render the final modified polymer water insoluble.
These polymers have found use in industrial fields such as enhanced oil recovery and
in the formulation of latex based paints. See Carbohydrate Polymers 12 (1990) 443-459,
R. Tanaka et al.
[0033] These polymers are widely used as rheology modifiers where their unique associative
capabilities are very important. In this application they are often referred to as
"associative thickeners". They are very different in behaviour from typical high molecular
weight water-soluble polymers. They also behave very differently from dispersants
which are low molecular weight and highly charged.
[0034] Associative thickeners are water-soluble polymers containing hydrophobic groups which
are capable of non-special hydrophobic association, similar to surfactants. See Polymers
as Rheology Modifiers, Chapter 12. page 207, Systems Approach to Rheology Control,
P.R.Howard, E.L. Leafure, S.T. Rosier and E.J. Schaller.
[0035] One group of these hydrophobically modified associative polymers are the hydrophobically
modified hydroxyethyl cellulose associative polymers. These polymers are available
from Aqualon Company as Natrosol Plus 330 and Plus 430 and previously from Hercules
as WSP-D-330. (Natrosol is a Trade Mark.) The hydrophobically modified hydroxyethyl
cellulose associate polymers are described by K.G. Shaw and D.P. Liepold, Journal
of Coatings Technology 57, No. 727, pp. 63-72 (August, 1985).
[0036] Another family of hydrophobically modified associative polymers are the hydrophobically
modified associative water-soluble anionic polymers which are derived from ethylenically
unsaturated acids such as acrylic acid and methyacrylic acid; ethylenically unsaturated
monomers such as 2-acrylamido-2-propane sulfonic acid(AMPS) and 1-allyloxy-2-hydroxypropyl
sulfonate and unsaturated acid monomers in general. Acrylate-based monomers are the
preferred monomers in deriving these polymers. Representatives of these polymers are
available from Rohm & Haas as Acrysol TT615, Acrysol ICS 1; Polyphobe 107 available
from Union Carbide and the Alcogum SL70 and 296W polymers available from Alco Chemical
Corporation. Polymers based on maleic acid copolymers and naphthalene sulfonate condensates
have not been effective in this invention. It is thought that this is due to their
inability to achieve high enough molecular weight to be effective. (AMPS and Acrysol
are Trade Marks).
[0037] Alcogum SL70 is thought to be a terpolymer of methacrylic acid, ethyl acrylate, and
a nonionic monomeric surfactant. The nonionic surfactant monomer consists of a poly(oxyethylene)
compound and an alkyl hydrocarbon segment. The components are consistent with the
patent literature in an approximate ratio of 40:50:10. The Alcogum 296W polymer is
the sodium salt of poly(acrylic acid) prepared by the hydrolysis of poly(methyl acrylate)
and was found to contain approximately 16 mole percent residual methyl acrylate units.
[0038] In another embodiment, the modified associative polymers are hydrophobically substituted
acrylamide copolymers. These copolymers result from substitution of an acrylamide
monomer to some extent to result in a copolymer. These copolymers can possess the
comonomers other than acrylamide with the following structures:

Other representative modified polymers used in the present invention are hydrophobically
substituted polyethylene oxide polymers. These multihydrophobically substituted polymers
indicate that two or more hydrophobic groups are desirable for optimum efficiency.
These polymers can have hydrophobic groups which are combined to the polyethylene
oxide polymer by ester linkages. Preferred polyethylene oxide polymers include polyethylene
oxide dioleate esters. Mapag 6000 available from PPG/Mazer is a representative polyethylene
oxide polymer. (Mapag is a Trade Mark).
[0039] other hydrophobically associative thickener polymers based on modified ethylene oxide
are also effective deposition control polymers as defined for use in the present invention.
Pluracol TH922 and TH916 available from BASF are polymers useful in accordance with
the present invention.
[0040] A further embodiment of the present invention utilizes associative water-soluble
urethane polymers. These polymers have alternating blocks of hydrophobic groups and
hydrophilic groups. These polyethylene glycol/ethylene oxide based urethane block
polymers may have molecular weights in the range of (10,000 to 2,000,000) and are
disclosed in US-A- 4 079 028 and US-A-4 155 892 as paint thickeners. Commercial formulations
of these copolymers are available as Acrysol RM-825 and Acrysol RM-1020 from Rohn
and Haas. These polymers comprise urethane block copolymers in different carrier fluids.
For instance, Acrysol RM-825 is a 25 percent solids grade of polymer in a mixture
of 25 percent butyl carbitol (a diethylene glycol monobutyl ether) and 75 percent
water. Similar copolymers are available from Union Carbide Corporation as UCAR SCT
200 and UCAR SCT 275. These compounds are discussed in US-A- 4 496 708. Similar compounds
are also available from Henkel Corporation under the trade names DSX 1514 and DSX
1550. These compounds are discussed in US-A- 4 438 225.
[0041] The polymers used in the present invention are effective at controlling the deposition
of organic contaminants in papermaking systems. This may include Kraft, acid sulfite,
mechanical pulp and recycled fiber systems. For example, deposition in the brown stock
washer, screen room and decker system in Kraft papermaking processes can be controlled.
The term "papermaking system" is meant to include all pulp processes. Generally, it
is thought that these polymers can be utilized to prevent deposition on all surfaces
from the beginning of the pulp mill to the reel of the papermachine under a variety
of pH values and conditions. More specifically, these polymers effectively decrease
the deposition not only on metal surfaces but also on plastic and synthetic surfaces
such as, for example, machine wires, felt, foils, Uhle boxes and headbox components.
[0042] The polymers may be added to the papermaking system along with other papermaking
additives. These can include other polymers, starch and sizing aids.
[0043] The polymers used in the present invention can be added to the pulp at any stage
of the papermaking system. They may be added directly to the pulp furnish or sprayed
on wires, felts, press rolls or other deposition-prone surfaces. They may be added
to the papermaking system neat, as a powder, slurry or in solution; the preferred
primary solvent being water but is not limited to such. They may be added specifically
and only to a furnish identified as contaminated or may be added to blended pulps.
The polymers may be added to the stock at any point prior to the manifestation of
the deposition problem and at more than one site when more than one deposition site
occurs. Combinations of the above additive methods may also be employed by way of
feeding the pulp millstock, feeding to the papermachine furnish, and spraying on the
wire and felt simultaneously. The effective amount of these polymers to be added to
the papermaking system depends on a number of variables, including the pH of the system,
hardness of the water, temperature of the water, additional additives, and the organic
contaminant type and content of the pulp. Generally, 0.5 parts per million to about
150 parts per million is added to the paper making system. Preferably, from about
10 parts per million to about 50 parts per million is added to the system.
[0044] There are several advantages anticipated with the present invention as compared to
prior processes. These advantages include: an ability to function without being greatly
affected by hardness of the water in the system; an ability to function with lower
foaming than surfactants, an ability to function while not adversely affecting sizing,
fines retention, and an ability to function at very low dosages, reduced environmental
impact, and improved biodegradability. Also, the ability of these agents to function
in spite of dilution has been clearly shown.
[0045] Further these agents have proven effective against both the pitch and stickies manifestation
of organic deposition problems providing for an effective reduction of these problems
in mills employing a variety of virgin and recycled fiber sources.
[0046] The data set forth below were developed to demonstrate the unexpected results occasioned
by use of the present invention. The following examples are included as being illustrations
of the present invention and should not be construed as limiting the scope thereof.
[0047] It was found that pitch (natural resins, etc.) could be made to deposit from a 0.5%
consistency fiber slurry containing approximately 2000 parts per million of a laboratory
pitch preparation by placing the slurry into a metal pan suspended in a laboratory
ultrasonic cleaner water bath. The slurry contained 0.5% bleached hardwood Kraft fiber,
approximately 2000 parts per million of the potassium salt of a fatty acid blend,
approximately 200 parts per million calcium from calcium chloride and approximately
300 parts per million sodium carbonate. The slurry was maintained at 50
oC and at a pH of 11.
[0048] It was stirred gently by an overhead stirrer and subjected to ultrasonic energy for
10 minutes. The deposit weight was determined by subtracting the starting weight of
the pan from the weight of the pan plus the deposit after completion of the test.
This was converted to percent control of deposit using the formula:

A high percent control of deposit is indicative of good deposit inhibiting qualities.
Studies of this type were conducted using hydrophobically modified associative polymers
of the type described in this invention. Results of this testing is reported in Table
I.
TABLE I
| Treatment Agent |
% Control |
| |
50 ppm |
10 ppm |
| Unmodified Hydroxyethyl Cellulose¹ |
60 |
1 |
| Hydrophobically modified Hydroxyethyl cellulose² |
97 |
23 |
| Hydrophobically modified Hydroxyethyl cellulose³ |
96 |
62 |
| Hydrophobically modified Hydroxyethyl cellulose⁴ |
94 |
-- |
| ¹ available commercially as Natrosol H4BR |
| ² available commercially as Natrosol Plus 330 |
| ³ available commercially as Natrosol Plus 430 |
| ⁴ available commercially as Hercules WSP-D-330 |
[0049] These results indicate that the hydrophobically modified associative polymers are
more efficient deposit inhibitors than the unmodified polymers of a related type.
These results further indicate that the polymers used in the present invention are
effective at controlling deposition on metal surfaces and under alkaline conditions
and specifically referred to typically as "pitch".
[0050] Further studies of the testing described in respect of Table I were conducted using
hydrophobically modified associative anionic polymers and anionic dispersants disclosed
as being preferred in the prior art. These results appear in Table II.

[0051] These results illustrate that the polymers used in the present invention are surprisingly
more effective for deposition control than known deposition inhibitors specifically,
they show efficacy at controlling pitch deposition.
[0052] Further testing as described in respect of Table 1 was conducted using hydrophobically
substituted acrylamide copolymers. The hydrophobic comonomers possess the structures:

The results of their testing appear in Table III.
TABLE III
| Treatment Agent |
Mole % Hydrophobe |
Molar Ratio AMD/IPA |
% Control |
| |
|
|
50 ppm |
20 ppm |
10 ppm |
| I |
0.0 |
11:1 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
| I |
0.3 |
11:1 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| I |
0.6 |
11:1 |
31 |
39 |
-- |
| I |
1.0 |
11:1 |
48 |
41 |
-- |
| I |
2.0 |
11:1 |
54 |
24 |
-- |
| I |
2.0 |
34:1 |
72 |
49 |
23 |
| I |
2.0 |
No IPA |
68 |
49 |
32 |
| I |
3.0 |
11:1 |
66 |
45 |
20 |
| I |
4.0 |
17:1 |
66 |
16 |
16 |
| II |
2.0 |
11:1 |
72 |
-- |
12 |
| II |
3.0 |
11:1 |
81 |
-- |
13 |
| II |
4.0 |
11:1 |
84 |
-- |
35 |
| II |
5.0 |
11:1 |
87 |
-- |
32 |
| II |
0.5 |
No IPA |
15 |
-- |
0 |
| II |
1.0 |
No IPA |
48 |
-- |
13 |
| II |
2.0 |
No IPA |
77 |
-- |
6 |
| II |
3.0 |
No IPA |
75 |
-- |
13 |
| II |
4.0 |
No IPA |
83 |
-- |
30 |
| III |
|
|
60 |
-- |
0 |
| III |
|
|
65 |
-- |
2 |
| IV |
2.0 |
11:1 |
46 |
-- |
0 |
| IV |
3.0 |
11:1 |
58 |
-- |
6 |
| IV |
4.0 |
11:1 |
70 |
-- |
39 |
| IV |
5.0 |
11:1 |
79 |
-- |
11 |
| IV |
0.5 |
No IPA |
16 |
-- |
6 |
| IV |
1.0 |
No IPA |
26 |
-- |
5 |
| IV |
2.0 |
No IPA |
49 |
-- |
21 |
| IV |
3.0 |
No IPA |
60 |
-- |
0 |
| IV |
4.0 |
No IPA |
67 |
-- |
25 |
The results of Table III indicate that the hydrophobically modified associative polymers
used in the present invention are effective at inhibiting deposition. The results
illustrate that substituted acrylamides used in the present invention are more efficient
at inhibiting deposition broadly and pitch deposition specifically than unsubstituted
acrylamides.
[0053] Additional testing was performed as described in respect of Table I using hydrophobically
substituted polyethylene oxides. These results are reported in Table IV.
TABLE IV
| Treatment Agent |
% Control |
| |
50 ppm |
10 ppm |
| Nonyl Phenol Ethoxylate (Surfonic N-95) |
81 |
9 |
| Polyethylene oxide dioleate (Mapeg 6000) |
85 |
36 |
| Talloweth-60 Myristal glycol (Dapral 282) |
88 |
46 |
| (Surfonic is a Trade Mark) |
[0054] The results indicated in Table IV are further indicative that the multi-hydrophobically
substituted polyethylene oxides are effective for inhibiting deposition. They were
also shown to be more effective than the known mono-hydrophobically substituted deposition
inhibitors.
[0055] Hydrophobically modified ethylene oxide polymers were also tested according to the
procedure described in respect of Table I. The results of this testing appear in Table
V.
TABLE V
| Treatment Agent |
% Control |
| |
50 ppm |
10 ppm |
| Hydrophobically modified Associative Ethylene Oxide¹ Copolymer |
95 |
88 |
| Hydrophobically Modified Associative ethylene oxide² Copolymer |
95 |
86 |
| ¹ Available commercially as Pluracol TH922 |
| ² Available commercially as Pluracol TH916 |
| (Pluracol is a Trade Mark) |
[0056] The results presented in Table V further show that the polymers used in the present
invention provide highly effective and efficient deposition control and more specifically,
pitch control.
[0057] Further studies of the testing described in respect of Table I were conducted using
commercially available associative water-soluble urethane polymers. These testing
results appear in Table VI.
TABLE VI
| Treatment Agent |
Percent Control of Pitch |
| |
100 ppm |
50 ppm |
10 ppm |
| Nonylphenol ethoxylate¹ |
|
81 |
9 |
| Sodium lignosulfate² |
0 |
4 |
11 |
| Hydrolyzed styrene maleic |
82 |
12 |
17 |
| anhydride³ |
|
|
|
| Diisobutene maleic anhydride⁴ |
13 |
13 |
0 |
| Water-soluble urethane polymer⁵ |
|
83 |
58 |
| Water-soluble urethane polymer⁶ |
|
87 |
72 |
| Water-soluble urethane polymer⁷ |
|
81 |
31 |
| Water-soluble urethane polymer⁸ |
|
87 |
49 |
| Water-soluble urethane polymer⁹ |
|
94 |
49 |
| Water-soluble urethane polymer¹⁰ |
|
96 |
75 |
| ¹ commercially available as Surfonic N-95 |
| ² commercially available as Lignosol XD |
| ³ commercially available as Alco SMA 1000 |
| ⁴ commercially available as Tamol 731 |
| ⁵ commercially available as Acrysol RM 1020 |
| ⁶ commercially available as Acrysol RM 825 |
| ⁷ commercially available as DSX 1514 |
| ⁸ commercially available as DSX 1550 |
| ⁹ commercially available as UCAR SCT 200 |
| ¹⁰ commercially available as UCAR SCT 275 |
[0058] These results indicate that the associative water-soluble urethane polymers used
in the present invention were more effective for inhibiting deposition than the known
deposition inhibitors. These results further indicate that these polymers are effective
at controlling deposition on the metal surfaces of papermaking systems.
[0059] Further studies of the testing described in respect of Table I were conducted using
water-soluble urethane polymers synthesized using a wide variety of reactive isocyanates,
water-soluble dios, branching agents, and terminating groups. These polymers constitute
polyethylene oxide/polyethylene glycol polymers with urethane linkages. They are synthesized
utilizing isocyanate compounds such as, for example, hexamethylene, diisocyanate,
toluene diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate, and other dihydroxyl reactive materials.
These polymers are also synthesized utilizing water-soluble diol compounds and can
be selected from polyethylene glycol compounds with molecular weights from about 400
to about 1450 and ethylene oxide/propylene oxide block copolymers. The isocyanates
included hexamethylene diisocyanate, toluene diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate
and other dihydroxyl reactive materials. The water-soluble diols included PEG (Polyethylene
Glycol) 400, PEG 600, PEG 1000, PEG 1450, Pluronic L-35 and Pluronic 10R5. (Pluronic
is a Trade Mark). The branching agents included glycerol and pentaerythritol. The
terminating groups (monohydroxy compounds) included 2-ethyl hexanol, nonyl phenol,
nonyl phenol ethoxylates with 40 and 70 moles E0, and secondary alcohol ethoxylates
with 30 moles E0.
These testing results appear in Table VII.
TABLE VII
| Urethane Polymer Components |
Percent Control of Deposition |
| Diol |
Isocyanate |
Branching Agent |
Termination Agent |
50 ppm |
10 ppm |
| PEG 400 |
HMDI |
--------- |
2-EH |
63 |
5 |
| PEG 400 |
HMDI |
Glycerol |
2-EH |
91 |
21 |
| PEG 600 |
TDI |
---- |
2-EH |
82 |
0 |
| Pluronic L-35 |
TDI |
---- |
2-EH |
91 |
24 |
| PEG 1000 |
HMDI |
---- |
2-EH |
89 |
23 |
| PEG 1000 |
HMDI |
---- |
N PH |
-- |
9 |
| PEG 1000 |
HMDI |
Penta |
2-EH |
-- |
23 |
| Pluronic 10R5 |
HMDI |
---- |
2-EH |
-- |
54 |
| PEG 1450 |
ISOPH |
---- |
NP-70 |
89 |
25 |
| PEG 1450 |
ISOPH |
---- |
NP-40 |
88 |
12 |
| PEG 1450 |
ISOPH |
---- |
NP-70 |
92 |
21 |
| PEG 1450 |
ISOPH |
---- |
15-S-30 |
97 |
62 |
| PEG 1450 |
HMDI |
---- |
15-S-30 |
96 |
64 |
| PEG 1450 |
ISOPH |
---- |
NP-70 |
84 |
18 |
| PEG 1450 |
ISOPH |
---- |
15-S-30 |
93 |
76 |
| -------- |
ISOPH |
Glycerol |
NP-40 |
92 |
12 |
| -------- |
ISOPH |
Glycerol |
15-S-30 |
94 |
19 |
| PEG 1450 |
ISOPH |
Glycerol |
15-S-30 |
78 |
12 |
PEG (MW) = polyethylene Glycol
Pluronic L-35 = EO/PO/EO Block Copolymer
Pluronic 10R5 = PO/EO/PO Block Copolymer
HMDI = Hexamethylene diisocyanate
TDI = Toluene Diisocyanate
ISOPH = Isophorone Diisocyanate
PENTA = Pentaerythritol
2-EH = 2-Ethyl Hexanol
N-pH = Nonyl Phenol
NP-70 = Nonyl Phenol with 70 moles EO
NP-40 = Nonyl Phenol with 40 moles EO
15-S-30 = Secondary Alcohol with 30 moles EO |
[0060] These results indicate that water-soluble urethane polymers used in the present invention
having a widely varying character with respect to branching, end groups, and character
of the backbone (diols and isocyanates used) can be highly effective for controlling
pitch deposition.
[0061] In order to establish the efficacy of the materials used in the present invention
as deposition control agents, on plastic surfaces and specifically for adhesive contaminants
of the sort found in recycled fiber, a laboratory test was devised utilizing adhesive-backed
tapes as stickie coupons. The stickie coupon can be fabricated from any type of adhesive
tape that will not disintegrate when placed in water. For the study, tapes made from
a styrenebutadiene rubber and vinylic esters were used. Both of these potential organic
contaminants are known to cause problems "stickies" in secondary fiber utilization.
A second coupon was fabricated from polyester film such as the product marketed as
MYLAR by the DuPont Chemical Company. This material was chosen because papermachine
forming fabrics are frequently made of polyester which is susceptible to considerable
problem caused by stickies.
[0062] 500 mL of solutions in 600 mL beakers containing various deposit control agents are
placed in a water bath heated to 50
oC. The tape and the polyester film coupons are placed in the test solution so the
adhesive side of the coupon faces away from the polyester film coupon. After 1 hour
of immersion, the adhesive side of the stickie coupon is placed in contact with the
polyester coupon and pressed to 1000 pound force.
[0063] The average peel strength of the bond formed between the tape coupon and the polyester
coupon was measured with an Instron tensile tester. The peel strength of the bond
formed between the stickie tape coupon and the polyester coupon was interpreted as
a measure of the tendency for an organic contaminant to attach to components of a
paper-machine and cause runnability or product quality problems. More specifically,
this indicates the tendency of a stickies deposit to form on a plastic surface.
[0064] The results of this testing appear in Table VIII.

[0065] The results shown in Table VIII further support the efficacy of the present invention
(examples 6-9 of Table VIII) for deposit control on plastic surfaces. They showed
better efficacy relative to prior art deposit control agents (examples 1-5 of Table
VIII). This demonstrates the effectiveness of nonionic polymers used in the present
invention for stickies deposition control.
[0066] Further studies of the testing described in Table VIII were conducted using commercially
available water-soluble anionic polymers. These test results appear in Table IX.

[0067] These results indicate that water-soluble anionic associative polymers used in the
present invention can be effective for controlling organic contaminant deposition
(examples 2-5 of Table IX). They further indicate the efficacy of these anionic polymers
at controlling stickies deposition. These results further illustrate how surprisingly
more effective this invention is than prior art use of anionic dispersant deposition
control agents (example 1 of table IX).
[0068] Papermaking consists of various processes which can be affected by sudden changes
in pH, temperature, dilution (i.e., concentration), shear force, etc. Severe changes
in these parameters can cause system shock which adversely impact paper production.
Deposit control agents that can strongly adsorb onto the organic contaminant surface
and resist the desorbing effects of dilution are highly desirable. Not only will deposition
control be improved, but also the required dosage will be reduced, while negative
side effects, such as forming and wet-end interferences, will be reduced or eliminated.
The procedure outlined in Table VIII was modified to examine the effect of dilution
on deposition control. Dilution was accomplished by immersing the adhesive tape and
MYLAR in distilled water for 30 minutes after the initial immersion. This can be repeated
as many times as desired. The results of the testing are tabulated in Table X.
TABLE X
| Sample |
Concen. (ppm) |
No Dilution |
1st Dilution |
2nd Dilution |
3rd Dilution |
4th Dilution |
| 1 |
50 |
100 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 2 |
50 |
100 |
8 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
| 3 |
50 |
100 |
34 |
16 |
5 |
0 |
| 4 |
50 |
88 |
86 |
81 |
62 |
40 |
| 5 |
10 |
100 |
95 |
95 |
94 |
95 |
| 6 |
10 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
94 |
95 |
| 7 |
10 |
100 |
94 |
93 |
89 |
89 |
| 8 |
10 |
100 |
95 |
95 |
95 |
96 |
Sample 1 = octylphenoxy poly(ethyleneoxy)ethanol
Sample 2 = nonylphenol ethoxylate
Sample 3 = dodecylphenoxypoly(ethyleneoxy) ethanol
Sample 4 = block copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide
Sample 5 = water soluble associative polymer available as Acrysol® RM-825
Sample 6 = water soluble associative polymer available as QR-708
Sample 7 = water soluble associative polymer available as DSX-1514
Sample 8 = water soluble associative polymer available as DSX-1550 |
[0069] As shown in Table X, the associative polymers used in the present invention (samples
5-8 of Table X) in this test were very effective after the fourth dilution. They showed
better performance relative to prior art deposit control agents (samples 1-4 of Table
X). This demonstrates a strong adsorbing power and good resistance to the desorbing
effects of dilution.
1. A method for inhibiting the deposition of organic contaminants from pulp in pulp and
papermaking systems which comprises treating the pulp and papermaking systems with
a hydrophobically modified associative polymer.
2. A method for inhibiting the deposition of organic contaminants from secondary fiber
during repulping which comprises treating the secondary fiber with a hydrophobically
modified associative polymer.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the hydrophobically modified associative
polymer is a hydrophobically modified nonionic associative polymer.
4. A method according to claim 3, wherein the hydrophobically modified nonionic associative
polymer is a hydrophobically modified hydroxyethyl cellulose associative polymer.
5. A method according to claim 3, wherein the hydrophobically modified nonionic associative
polymer is a hydrophobically substituted acrylamide copolymer.
6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the hydrophobically substituted acrylamide
copolymer has a structure including one selected from:-
7. A method according to claim 3, wherein the hydrophobically modified nonionic associative
polymer is a hydrophobically substituted polyethylene oxide polymer.
8. A method according to claim 7, wherein the hydrophobically substituted polyethylene
oxide polymer has hydrophobic groups which are combined to the polyethylene oxide
polymer by ester linkages.
9. A method according to claim 8, wherein the hydrophobically substituted polyethylene
oxide polymer is a polyethylene oxide dioleate ester.
10. A method according to claim 7, wherein the hydrophobically substituted polyethylene
oxide polymer is an associative water-soluble polyethylene oxide polymer with urethane
linkages.
11. A method according to claim 10, wherein the associative water-soluble polyethylene
oxide polymer with urethane linkages is synthesized from isocyanate compounds or water-soluble
diol compounds.
12. A method according to claim 11, wherein isocyanate compounds are selected from hexamethylene
diisocyanate, toluene diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate, and other dihydroxyl
reactive compounds, or the water-soluble diols are selected from polyethylene glycol
compounds, and ethylene oxide/propylene oxide block copolymers.
13. A method according to claim 12, wherein the polyethylene glycol compounds have the
molecular weight from about 400 to about 1450.
14. A method according to any of claims 10 to 13, wherein the associative water-soluble
polyethylene oxide polymer further comprises synthesis utilizing a branching agent.
15. A method according to claim 14, wherein the branching agent is selected from glycerol
and pentaerythritol.
16. A method according to any of claims 10 to 15, wherein the associative water-soluble
polyethylene oxide polymer with urethane linkages has a molecular weight from about
10,000 to about 2,000,000.
17. The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the hydrophobically modified associative
polymer is hydrophobically modified nonionic associative polymer derived from an ethylenically
unsaturated acis, an ethylenically unsaturated monomer or an unsatruated acid monomer.
18. A method according to any of claims 1 to 17, wherein the hydrophobically modified
associative polymer is delivered to the pulp and papermaking system or to the secondary
fiber in a carrier solvent.
19. A method according to claim 18, wherein the carrier solvent is water.
20. A method according to any of claims 1 to 17, wherein the hydrophobically modified
associative polymer is delivered to the pulp and papermaking system or to the secondary
fiber as a powder or a slurry.
21. A method according to any of claims 1 to 20, wherein the hydrophobically modified
associative polymer is added to the pulp and papermaking system or to the secondary
fiber by spraying.
22. A method according to claim 21, wherein the hydrophobically modified associative polymer
is sprayed onto the paper machine wire, paper machine felt, paper machine press roll
or other surfaces prone to deposition.
23. A method according to any of claims 1 to 21, wherein the hydrophobically modified
associative polymer is added to the pulp and papermaking system or to the secondary
fiber with the furnish.
24. A method according to any of claims 1 to 23, wherein the deposition of organic contaminants
occurs on the metal surfaces of the pulp and papermaking systems or of the repulping
systems.
25. A method according to any of claims 1 to 23, wherein the depositions of organic contaminants
occurs on the plastic surfaces of the pulp and papermaking systems or of the repulping
systems.
26. A method according to any of claims 1 and 3 to 25, wherein the hydrophobically modified
associative polymer is added to the papermaking systems with other papermaking treatments.
27. A method according to any of claims 1 and 3 to 26, wherein the organic contaminant
is selected from one or more of a pitch deposit and a stickies deposit.
28. A method according to any of claims 1 and 3 to 27, wherein the polymer is added to
the paper machine stock or added directly to the contamination prone surface.
29. A method according to claim 28, wherein the surface is selected from paper machine
wire and paper machine wet felt.
30. A method according to any of claims 1 and 3 to 29, wherein the pulp and papermaking
system is experiencing the effects of dilution.