Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates generally to apparatus and methods for necking-in container
bodies preferably in the form of a cylindrical one-piece metal can having an open
end terminating in an outwardly directed peripheral flange merging with a circumferentially
extending neck and, more particularly, to an improved spin flow necking process and
apparatus for controlling the final movement of forming members to prevent unacceptable
plug diameter variation.
Background Art
[0002] Spin flow necking is a process of necking-in an open end of a metal container to
provide a flange which allows a can end to be seamed thereto after filling. Necking
also makes conveying of the cans easier since, with only slight flange overlap, the
cans contact body-to-body instead of flange-to-flange which would otherwise cause
tilting and conveying jams.
[0003] While numerous necking processes have been developed since the 1970's, a particularly
promising spin flow process and apparatus having the potential of allowing can ends
to be necked-in to increasingly smaller diameters is disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,781,047,
issued November 1, 1988 to Bressan, which is assigned to Ball Corporation and is exclusively
licensed to the assignee of the present invention, Reynolds Metals Company. The disclosure
of this patent is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. It concerns
a process where an externally located free spinning forming roll 11 (Figure 1) is
moved inward and axially against the outside wall C' of the open end C'' of a rotating
trimmed can C to form a conical neck at the open end thereof. With reference to Figure
1, a spring-loaded holder or slide roll 19 supports the interior wall of the can C
and moves axially under the forming force of the free roll 11. This is a single operation
where the can rotates and the free roll 11 rotates so that a smooth conical necked
end is produced. In practice, the can is then flanged. The term "spin flow necking"
is used in this application to refer to such processes and apparatus, the essential
difference between spin flow necking and other types of spin necking being the axial
movement of both the external roll 11 and the internal support 19.
[0004] More specifically, the spin flow tooling assembly 10 depicted in Figure 1 (corresponding
to Figure 1 of the Bressan et al '047 patent, supra) includes a necking spindle shaft
16a rotatable about its axis of rotation A by means of a spindle gear 16 mounted to
the shaft between front and rear bearings (not shown). The slide roll 19 is mounted
to the front end of the necking spindle shaft 16a through a slide mechanism 28, keyed
to the shaft, which permits co-rotation of the roll 19 while allowing it to be slid
by the necking forces described more fully below in the axially rearward direction
B' away from the eccentric freewheeling roll 24 located adjacent the front face of
the slide roll. The axially fixed idler roll 24, having an axis of rotation B which
is parallel to and rotatable about spindle axis A, is mounted via bearings 16b and
23 to an eccentrically formed front end of an eccentric roll support shaft 18. This
shaft 18 extends through the necking spindle shaft 16a. The spindle shaft 16a is rotated
by the spindle gear 16 without rotating the eccentric roll support shaft 18.
[0005] The outer forming roll 11 is mounted radially outwardly adjacent the slide and eccentric
rolls 19,24.
[0006] The container slide roll 19 is shaped with a conical leading edge 19a designed to
first engage the open end C'' of the container C to support same for rotation about
spindle axis A under the driving action of the necking spindle gear 16 which may be
driven by the same drive mechanism driving each base pad assembly 29 engaging the
container bottom wall. Slide roll 19 is also free to slide axially but is resiliently
biased into the container open end C'' via springs 20 which may be of the compression
type.
[0007] In operation, the container open end C'' engages and is rotated by the slide roll
19. The eccentric roll 24 is then rotated into engagement with a part of the inside
surface of the container side wall C' located inwardly adjacent the open end C''.
With reference to Figures 2A-2E, the external forming roll 11 then begins to move
radially inward into contact with the container side wall C' spanning the gap respectively
formed between the conical faces 19a,24e of the slide and eccentric rolls 19,24. More
specifically, the side wall C' of the spinning container body C is initially a straight
cylindrical section of generally uniform diameter and thickness which may extend from
a pre-neck (not shown) previously formed in the container side wall such as by static
die necking. As the external forming roll 11 engages the container side wall C', it
commences to penetrate the gap between the fixed internal eccentric roll 24 and the
axially movable slide roll 19, forming a truncated cone (Figure 2B). The side wall
of the cone increases in length as does the height of the cone as the external forming
roll chamfer 11c continues to squeeze or press the container metal along the complemental
slope or truncated cone 24e of the eccentric roll 24 as depicted in Figure 2C. The
cone continues to be generated as the external forming roll 11 advances radially inwardly
(the slide roll 19 continues to retract axially as a result of direct pushing contact
from roll 11 through the metal) until a reduced diameter 124 is achieved as depicted
in Figures 2C and 2D. As the cone is being formed, the necked-in portion 124 or throat
of the container C conforms to the shape of the forming portion of the forming roll
11. The rim portions 123 of the neck which extend radially outwardly from the necked-in
portion 124 are being formed by the complemental tapers 11b,19a of the forming roll
11 and the slide roll 19 to complete the necked-in portion.
[0008] The above-described spin flow necking process, while producing a large diameter reduction
in the open end of the container C (e.g., 0.350"), has various drawbacks when applied
to two-piece aluminum can manufacture. One drawback, for example, is grooving of the
neck at the initial point of contact between rolls 11,19 in Figure 2B which occurs
on the inside of the container as a result of the small radii on the forming roll
pushing past and against the small radii on the slide roll as the forming roll moves
radially inwardly and axially rearwardly during the necking process along the chamfer
24e of the eccentric roll. Due to the force of spring 20 urging the slide roll 19
toward the eccentric roll 24, the metal caught between these colliding radii (which
are forcefully pressed together under spring bias) is grooved on both the inner and
outer surfaces of the neck. On the inside surface, this grooving results in metal
exposure (i.e., wearing away of the protective coating) which often allows the beverage
to "eat through" the container side wall C'. It has also been discovered that such
grooving often results in actual cutting of the metal as the form roll 11 is radially
inwardly advanced from the position depicted in Figure 2B to that of Figure 2C.
[0009] As the form roll 11 moves into its radially inwardmost position depicted in Figure
2E, the spring pressure acting against the slide roll 19 in the direction of the forming
roll disadvantageously results in pinching of the end of the flange-like portion 123
and undesirable thinning of the metal. In some cases, particularly when necking a
can to smaller diameters (e.g., 204 or 202), the edge is sometimes thinned down to
a knife edge.
[0010] To prevent both grooving of the container side wall and excessive thinning of the
flange type edge during the aforementioned spin flow necking process, a cam ring is
secured to the slide roll to present a cam follower surface which is contacted by
the form roll during radial inward advancing movement of the latter at the on-set
of the necking-in process. The cam follower surface and the conical surface of the
form roll facing the cam follower surface are further arranged to produce the following
motions:
In Figure 3A, the form roll axis has moved radially inwardly closer to the container
axis and has started to form the neck. The conical surface 24e on the eccentric roll
24 has forced the form roll 11 toward the open end C'' of the container C. The form
roll 11 has just touched the cam follower surface 104. The small radius 106 on the
form roll 11 is very close to the small radius 108 on the slide roll 19' but does
not pinch the metal between these two points. This is because the cam ring follower
surface 104 is positioned so these radii 106,108 may approach each other but stay
separated by a distance slightly greater than the initial side wall thickness. This
is presently understood to be a key feature in the elimination of metal exposure and
neck cracks caused by excessive contact pressure between the two small radii 106,108
in the uncontrolled collison of the form roll 11 with the metal wrapped around the
small radii 108 on the slide roll 19 in the prior spin flow necking process described
hereinabove. In other words, since the form roll 11 contacts the cam follower surface
104 as the two radii 106,108 approach, such contact results in retraction or rearward
axial sliding movement of the slide roll 19' which permits the two radii to move past
each other.
[0011] In Figure 3B, the form roll 11 has penetrated further between the eccentric roll
24 and the slide roll 19'. The small radius 106 on the form roll 11 is just passing
the small radius 108 on the slide roll 19'. The rolls 11,19' do not pinch the metal
but have moved closer. As mentioned above, the form roll 11 is forcing the slide roll
19' back by contact between the form roll and the cam ring 102 instead of contact
at this point between the form roll and the slide roll as occurred in the aforesaid
prior spin flow necking process.
[0012] In Figure 3C, the form roll 11 has continued its penetration and the small radius
106 is past the small radius 108 on the slide roll 19' (point A). At this point, the
conical surfaces 19a,11b on the slide roll and the form roll, respectively, are opposite
and parallel each other. The slide roll 19' and cam ring 102 have been pushed to the
left in Figure 3C. The combination of the metal thickening as a result of being squeezed
between the form roll 11 and the eccentric roll 24 as the metal wraps around the forming
surface 11a of the form roll, and the shape of the left or trailing conical surface
11b on the form roll, has reduced the relative clearance between the form roll and
the slide roll so that the form roll is now actually putting slight pressure on the
metal.
[0013] In Figure 3D, the form roll 11 has now penetrated further into the gap between the
eccentric and slide rolls 24,19'. The form roll 11 is clearly clamping the metal between
it and the slide roll 19' and, as a result, a gap 130 has opened up between the form
roll surface 11b and the cam ring follower surface 104. The form roll 11 is now pushing
the slide roll 19' directly in the axially rearward direction through its contact
with the metal, and not through the cam ring 102. Since the small radii 106,108 between
the form roll 11 and slide roll 19' have already "slipped" past each other without
undesirable grooving of the metal therebetween, the direct interaction of the form
roll in thinning and shaping the metal against the bias of the conical surface 19a
on the slide roll is important to ensure proper necking and distribution of metal.
[0014] In Figure 3E, the form roll 11 has now penetrated to its radially inwardmost position
to complete the formation of the spin flow neck. During the entire forming process,
between 20 to 24 revolutions of the container C are required, depending on the diameter,
thickness and the amount of diameter reduction in the container end. The rolling contact
between the form roll 11 and the slide roll 19' has thinned the edge of the flange
slightly. Therefore, in accordance with a further feature of this invention, the form
roll 11 now once again contacts the cam ring 102 to prevent further thinning of the
flange area of the container C, i.e., gap 130 has closed.
[0015] The foregoing cam ring improvement to the spin flow necking process is disclosed
in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 07/929,933, filed August 14, 1992, by Harry
W. Lee, Jr. et al, which application is assigned to Reynolds Metals Company, the assignee
of the present application. The disclosure of this application is hereby incorporated
by reference herein in its entirety.
[0016] The cam ring advantageously eliminates the grooving and cut necks, as well as excessive
thinning of the flange, that were prevalent before its introduction. However, the
interaction of the outer form roll with the eccentric and slide rolls to achieve the
final necked-in state depicted in either Figure 2E (no cam ring) or Figure 3E (with
cam ring) has been discovered, through extensive experimentation, to directly affect
the plug diameter (i.e., the inner diameter of the necked-in portion such as measured
at 124 in Figure 2E) and the length of flange 123, with or without the cam ring, and
at any given base pad setting (i.e., the fixed distance during necking between the
base pad 29 supporting the can bottom and the axially immovable eccentric roll), resulting
in unacceptable variations therein. In a can plant environment, particularly when
employing numerous necking-in tooling assemblies in a multi-station machine of the
type disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 07/929,932, filed August 14,
1992, by Harry W. Lee, Jr. et al, entitled "Spin Flow Necking Apparatus and Method
of Handling Cans Therein", assigned to Reynolds Metals Company, the present assignee,
control over the plug diameter and flange width achieved with the tooling assembly
at each station is critical to achieving homogeneity in product and successful continuous
operation. The disclosure of the '932 application is hereby incorporated by reference
herein in its entirety.
[0017] It is accordingly an object of the present invention to prevent unacceptable variations
in can plug diameter and flange length during the spin flow necking process.
[0018] Another object is to control the interaction of the outer form roll with the inner
slide roll to ensure such uniformity in plug diameters and acceptable plug diameter
variation.
[0019] Yet another object is to control the aforesaid interaction between the outer form
roll and the inner slide roll with the can by limiting the final movement of the inner
slide roll and thereby the final movement of the outer form roll so that the final
radially inward advancing movement of the latter is directly controlled by controlling
the movement of the inner slide roll.
[0020] Yet another object is to provide a control mechanism that may be installed in each
tooling assembly in the plant tool room so as to pre-set the movement of the inner
slide roll to achieve the aforesaid uniformity in plug diameter, prior to installing
the assemblies in a multi-station machine for continuous production of product.
[0021] Yet another object is to provide a plug diameter control mechanism which is simple
in design, easy to install, and capable of rugged continuous operation without wear.
Disclosure of the Invention
[0022] An apparatus for necking-in an open end of a container body comprises a first member
and a second member mounted for engaging the open end of the container side wall along
an inner surface thereof. Means is provided for rotating the container body and externally
located means moves radially inward into deforming contact with an outside surface
of the container side wall in a region thereof overlying an interface between the
first and second members. Such contact between the externally located means with the
side wall causes the contacted wall portion to move radially inwardly into a gap formed
at the interface, caused by axial separation of the first and second members under
the action of the radially inward advancing movement of the externally located means
into the gap to thereby neck-in the side wall. In accordance with the present invention,
means is provided for limiting the final axial movement of the first member which
in turn controls the final radially inwardmost location of the externally located
means to ensure substantially uniform plug diameters in the necked-in cans.
[0023] In the preferred embodiment, the radial movement of the externally located means
is cam controlled and the means for limiting its final radially inwardmost location
overrides the radial movement otherwise provided through the camming surface.
[0024] In the preferred embodiment, the first member is a slide roll engaging and supporting
the inside of the container open end. The slide roll is mounted for driven rotary
motion about, and axial movement along, the container axis. The slide roll is resiliently
biased into the container open end. The second member is an axially fixed roll mounted
in axially inwardly spaced relation to the slide roll for engagement with an inside
surface of the container side wall. The second roll has a conical end surface which
faces the open end of the container and the slide roll includes a conical end surface
facing the conical end surface of the axially fixed roll in opposite inclination thereto.
The externally located means is a form roll having a peripheral deforming nose positioned
externally of the container side wall and mounted for free rotary and controlled radial
movement towards and away from the container. The form roll is biased for axial movement
along an axis parallel to the container axis. The form roll deforming nose includes
first and second oppositely inclined conical surfaces which are respectively opposed
to the conical surfaces on the second roll and slide roll.
[0025] The limiting means preferably includes a stop spacer means which is fixedly mounted
to a tooling spindle housing supporting the first and second rolls. The spacer means
includes a stop surface in axial alignment with a rearward facing movable annular
surface of the slide roll assembly. Without the spacer means, the slide roll assembly
is normally free to move (against resilient bias) in the axially rearward direction
towards the spindle housing as a result of camming engagement with the cam controlled,
radially and axially movable outer form roll, without "bottoming out" of the slide
roll assembly against the spindle housing. However, with the spacer means of the present
invention, the stop surface contacts the slide roll assembly to prevent further axial
retracting movement thereof before the cam controlled outer form roll has otherwise
completed its radially inward movement as a result of cam follower action. Stopping
of the slide roll assembly in this unique manner prevents further radially inward
advancing movement of the outer form roll which advantageously results in substantially
uniform plug diameters in successively necked cans.
[0026] The spacer means of the present invention is preferably used in combination with
the cam ring improvement mounted to the slide roll radially outwardly adjacent therefrom.
[0027] A method of spin flow necking-in an open end of the cylindrical container body is
also disclosed. The method comprises the steps of positioning inside the container
body an axially fixed roll engageable with the inside surface of the container body.
The axially fixed roll has a sloped end surface which faces the open end of the container
body. A slide roll is also positioned inside the container body which fits the inside
diameter of the open end to support same. The slide roll has an end which faces the
sloped end surface of the axially fixed roll. The slide roll is supported for axially
displacement away from the axially fixed roll. The slide roll end and the sloped end
surface of the axially fixed roll define a gap therebetween. An outer form roll is
positioned opposite the gap radially outwardly from the container body for axial displacement
away from the axially faced roll during contact with the sloped end of same. The form
roll has a trailing end portion and a peripheral forming portion. As the container
body spins, the form roll is advanced radially inwardly relative to the gap so that
the trailing end portion presented by the roll and the sloped end surface of the axially
fixed roll engage the container body between them while a trailing end portion of
the form roll moves inwardly along the sloped end surface of the axially fixed roll
to roll a neck into the container body. As the body continues to spin while the form
roll moves inwardly, the slide roll is retracted axially until the roller has spun
an outwardly extending portion on the end portion of the container body engaged between
the slide roll and the container. In accordance with the method of the invention,
the final axial retracting movement of the slide roll is controlled by having the
slide roll contact a spacer fixedly mounted axially rearwardly of the slide roll.
Such limiting contact prevents further radially inward advancing movement of the outer
form roll by overriding the cam follower movement of the outer form roll. This in
turn produces substantially uniform plug diameters in the necked-in containers.
[0028] In accordance with a further feature of the invention, the axial retracting movement
of the slide roll, prior to contacting the spacer, is controlled by contact between
a surface of the form roll with a cam follower surface. More specifically, the form
roll has conical surfaces which are respectively engageable with the sloped end surface
of the axially fixed roll and another sloped end surface on the slide roll. These
form roll conical surfaces are smoothly connected with a curved forming surface extending
therebetween and defined by a pair of small radii. The sloped end of the slide roll
is also smoothly connected through another small radius to the axially extending surface
thereof which is engageable with the inside surface of the container body. The cam
follower surface operates to axially retract the slide roll as the small radius on
the form roll approaches the small radius on the slide roll to thereby prevent pinching
of the container side wall between these two small radii by allowing the radii to
approach each other while maintaining separation therebetween by a distance slightly
greater than the original thickness of the container side wall. Continued radially
inward forming movement past a predetermined point at which the metal of the container
side wall between the slide roll and the conical surface of the form roll has thickened
will result in the form roll putting slight pressure directly on the metal. A gap
opens between the form roll and cam follower surface so that the form roll is now
pushing the slide roll directly through contact with the metal and not through contact
with the cam follower surface. As the outermost end of the container side wall moves
between the form roll and the slide roll, the form roll will once again contact the
cam follower surface so that the rolling contact between the form roll and the slide
roll does not excessively thin the edge of the open end. As this occurs, the slide
roll will contact the spacer means and thereby be prevented from further axial retracting
movement. The conical interconnection through the cam follower surface thereby prevents
further radially inward movement of the form roll.
[0029] Still other objects and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent
to those skilled in this art from the following detailed description, wherein only
the preferred embodiments of the invention are shown and described, simply by way
of illustration of the best mode contemplated of carrying out the invention. As will
be realized, the invention is capable of other and different embodiments, and its
several details are capable of modifications in various obvious respects, all without
departing from the invention. Accordingly, the drawing and description are to be regarded
as illustrative in nature, and not as restrictive.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0030]
Figure 1 is a cross-sectional view of a prior spin flow necking process;
Figures 2A-2E are enlarged, cross-sectional sequential views depicting the spin flow
necking forming sequence with the tooling of Figure 1;
Figures 3A-3E are enlarged, detailed sequential views depicting the relative locations
of the tooling components during necking with the cam ring improvement;
Figure 4A is a cross-sectional illustration of a tooling necking spindle assembly
in accordance with the present invention;
Figure 4B is a sectional view taken along the line 4B-4B of Figure 4A;
Figure 5 corresponds to Figure 7 of applicant's co-pending '932 application to depict
cam controlled linkage and tool activation assemblies for controlling radial movement
of the outer form rolls in a spin flow necking machine; and
Figures 6-13 are graphical comparative representations of test results to illustrate
plug diameter variations with and without the present invention.
Best Mode for Carrying Out Invention
[0031] Figures 4A and 4B are is a sectional view illustrations of a spin flow necking assembly
1000 in accordance with the present invention. Therein, the functional components
are substantially identical to the tooling components described in connection with
Figure 1, supra, and in connection with Figures 3A-3E, supra, except as noted hereinbelow.
[0032] Furthermore, the spin flow necking assembly 1000 of Figure 4A is adapted to be used
as one of plural spin flow necking cartridges which may be mounted as known in the
art to a main necking turret of a spin flow necking machine in respective coaxial
alignment with base pad assemblies mounted to a base pad turret of such a machine.
An exemplary embodiment of such a machine is depicted in Figure 1A of our aforesaid
copending application Serial No. 929,932 (hereinafter "the '932 application"), incorporated
herein by reference. Except as noted hereinbelow, the tooling assembly 1000 of Figure
4A functions in a manner identical to the tooling assembly of Figure 5 (incorporated
herein by reference) disclosed in our '932 application. Briefly, the eccentric roll
24 is rotated from its eccentric solid line position depicted in Figure 4A in supporting
contact with the can open end into a radially inward clearance position (not shown)
via rotation of the pinion 108 through a plurality of tooling activation assemblies
200 mounted to the rear face of the tooling disc turret. Figure 5 herein corresponds
to Figure 7 (the written disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein)
of our co-pending '932 application. Therein, it can be seen that rotation of pinion
108 as well as radial movement of form roll or roller 11 (supported by shaft 1010)
is controlled through a series of radially extending linkage arrangements 210 respectively
interconnecting each tooling activation assembly 200 to a cam follower 204 in rolling
contact with a cam surface 206 of a cam ring which is stationarily mounted to a support
frame supporting the tooling disc turret. Further relevant details of Figure 5 will
be discussed hereinbelow.
[0033] As discussed above, each necking spindle assembly 1000 depicted in Figure 4A operates
in the manner described supra with reference to Figures 3A-3E. However, in accordance
with the present invention, the necking operation described in connection with Figure
3E is affected through the interposition of a plurality of identical stop spacers
1025 which are bolted to the front end of the spindle mounting assembly with bolts
1044 located radially outwardly from the path of movement of the slide roll 19'. The
spacers 1025 extend radially inwardly from mounting screws 1044 to define a series
of equispaced stop surfaces 1050 which are coplanar to each other and intersect the
plane of axial movement of the rear facing shoulder 1052 of the slide roll 19'.
[0034] With the stop spacers 1025 of Figure 4A, as the form roll 11 is moved towards its
radially innermost position of Figure 3E under the action of cam follower 204 of Figure
5 which rotates shaft 1010 through activation plate 275, the rear surface 1052 of
the slide roll 19' contacts the stop surface 1050 of spacers 1025 which prevents further
axial retraction of the slide roll assembly. This in turn prevents or "freezes" final
radial movement of form roll 11 which would otherwise occur solely as a result of
contact between cam follower 204 with cam surface 206. In this manner, the final radial
positioning of outer form roll 11 is always controlled by the contact between the
slide roll 19' with the spacers 1025 which axially "locks" the slide roll to override
final radially inward camming movement of the outer form roll 11. Therefore, since
the final radially inwardmost location of forming surface 11a of form roll 11 is now
controlled by the stop spacer arrangement 1025 described supra, the resulting plug
diameter formed by this surface 11a is substantially uniform. Stated differently,
as the form roll 11 is forced into the gap between the eccentric roll 24 and the slide
roll 19, the slide roll is forced away from the eccentric roll as discussed in connection
with Figures 3A-3D. When the slide roll assembly 19 hits the stop spacers 1025, movement
of the slide roll is halted. This in turn stops further inward radial travel of form
roll 11. The eccentric roll 24 is axially rigid so when the slide roll 19 hits the
stop surface 1050, the gap cannot get any wider. Therefore, the form roll 11 must
stop.
[0035] Although it is theoretically possible to stop the movement of the slide roll 19 in
the necking tooling of the Figure 1 embodiment (no cam ring) by placement of a spacer
attached to collar 21 to contact the rear shoulder of slide roll 19', this is very
difficult in practice. This is because when the form roll 11 forces the slide roll
19 against the stop surface 1025 in Figure 4A, the force of the form roll that is
moving the slide roll toward the stop acts through the cam ring and not through the
can flange itself which would otherwise occur without the cam ring. The force required
to actually form the can is approximately 80-100 pounds and the override spring 279
(Figure 5) located on the side of the necking turret is pre-loaded to about 200-250
pounds. Since the cam follower movement transmitted through this spring 279 from cam
follower 204 (Figure 5) to the form roll 11 is a part of the mechanism which controls
radial movement of the form roll, when the slide roll stops the form roll, it overrides
this spring and the force of the form roll therefore builds from 80-100 pounds up
to 200-250 pounds. This extra force must be supported by the cam ring on one side
of the form roll and the eccentric roll and the can neck on the other side of the
form roll. Therefore, if the cam ring is not used, the force required to stop the
form roll must come from the slide roll face through the can flange to the form roll
as in Figure 1. This force on such a narrow can flange would be enough to roll the
flange to a thin knife edge which unacceptably causes split flanges and uneven flange
width.
[0036] The override spring 269 in the cam follower actuating linkage depicted in Figure
5 was initially designed to perform an override function upon latch-out of the form
roll activation plate 275 to prevent metal-to-metal contact between the form roll
11 and the holder and eccentric rolls 19,24 in the absence of can bodies, by preventing
the form roll from traveling into its final radial cam controlled position into contact
with these inner rolls, by allowing the spring loaded screw head 266 of the connecting
screw in Figure 5 to lift from its seated position to the lifted position depicted
in Figure 5. This override spring 269 now performs the additional function of allowing
the linkage length of the connecting linkage arrangement 210 of Figure 5 to adjust
so that the spring 269 is compressed approximately .006" which provides bias to ensure
that the form roll 11 moves to the same radially inwardmost position each time to
maintain a consistent can plug diameter when the slide roll 19 contacts the stop spacers
1025. This pre-set compression of about .006" occurs when there is no can in the forming
station. When a can is in the forming station, the spring is overridden more than
the .006" because of the can metal thickness.
[0037] By limiting the inward travel of form roll 11, it is possible to maintain the plug
diameter of the can open end within much closer limits than would occur without the
stop spacer arrangement 1025. This is because the stop spacers 1025 limit the travel
of the slide roll 19 to a specific dimension which produces a specific plug diameter.
Once this specific dimension of travel is known, the tooling can be pre-set in the
tool room to produce a can of specific plug diameter, by appropriate selection of
stop spacer thickness which may be ground to a requisite thickness. Pre-setting the
necking tooling in this manner in the tool room advantageously eliminates tedious
adjustment of each station (e.g., thirty stations) on the spin flow necking machine.
[0038] Furthermore, since the plug diameter is now controlled by the slide roll travel,
any adjustment to the base pad 29 (e.g., in Figure 1) will mostly affect the flange
width. Therefore, this means that the flange width can now be adjusted independently
from the plug diameter by moving the base pad towards or away from the necking tooling
to control the flange width. This greatly simplifies the operation of the spin flow
necking machine in a can plant environment.
[0039] Figure 6 is a graph depicting the variation in plug diameter which occurs during
consecutive can runs when using the necking tooling of Figure 4A without the stop
spacers 1025 of the present invention. Therein, it can be seen that there exists considerable
variation in the can plug diameter when employing the tooling of Figure 4A without
the stop spacers.
[0040] Figure 7 is a graph of plug diameter during a continuous run of one hundred and sixty
one cans, in the order of running, utilizing the tooling assembly of Figure 4 with
the stop spacer arrangement 1025 of the instant invention. By comparison of the test
results between Figures 6 and 7, it is clear that the stop spacer arrangement 1025
of the instant invention results in more consistent, substantially uniform plug diameters
versus that achieved without the stop spacer arrangement.
[0041] The continuous runs depicted in Figures 6 and 7 each occurred with a single base
pad setting of approximately 3.973". Figure 8 is a graph depicting the manner in which
the plug diameter varies utilizing different base pad settings and the necking tooling
of the Figure 4A without the stop spacer arrangement 1025 of the instant invention.
At each setting, approximately 12 cans were fed in before the 20 numbered cans depicted
in Figure 8 were run. Without the stop spacers 1025, when the can is positioned closer
to the tooling, i.e., the open end of the can has slid further onto the slide roll,
the flange width is increased almost directly by the amount the can is moved forward.
The plug diameter is also larger because of the higher forces required to form the
can with a wider flange. The results depicted in Figure 8 show that the plug diameter
tends to increase by approximately 80% of the amount the can is moved forward. For
example, if the base pad is moved forward by about .010" and a can is formed with
the necking tooling of Figure 4A without the stop spacers 1025 of the present invention,
its flange width would be about .010" wider and the plug diameter would be about .008"
larger than a can formed at the original setting. In Figure 8, the tooling of Figure
4A (but without the stop spacers) was set to make a can with a small flange and plug
and the base pad 29 was moved forward toward the tooling in approximately .005" increments.
At the first base pad setting of 3.996", the cans produced had plug diameters which
were smaller than could be measured with a plug gauge. At the next setting of 3.992",
only a few cans could be measured which had a plug diameter of about 2.125-1.126".
The next setting of 3.985" produced cans within the range of measurement. Thereafter,
as the base pad setting decreased, all plug diameters were measurable.
[0042] From the graph of Figure 8, it can be seen that as the base pad is moved toward the
tooling, the average plug diameter increases by about 80% of the base pad movement,
i.e., without the stop spacer arrangement 1025 of the present invention. Second, the
variation in plug diameter within each test, i.e., at successively lower base pad
settings, is higher than in comparable tests using stop spacer arrangements as depicted
in Figure 9 which is a test conducted in a similar manner to the test of Figure 8
but with stop spacers.
[0043] From a comparison of Figures 8 and 9, it is obvious that the individual can plug
diameters are more uniform within a single group. Further, it is also obvious that
the average plug diameter is less affected by a change in base pad settings.
[0044] Figures 10-12 depict further test results in a manner similar to that of Figure 9,
i.e., utilizing stop spacers 1025 of the invention, but with different overrides of
cam spring 269 or different numbers of revolutions during forming. All of these tests
depict the same trends as the test results depicted in Figure 9.
[0045] From the foregoing test results, the slope of the test results in Figure 8 (no stop
spacers according to the invention) is about 38° which indicates that the plug diameter
changes approximately 80% of the base pad position change, as discussed supra. However,
the average slope of the other curves in Figures 9-12 is about 16° which means that
the plug diameter changes only about 28% of the base pad position change. Thus, significant
advantages are achieved with the Figure 4A embodiment of the invention utilizing the
stop spacers 1025 in a production environment where a multistation (e.g., 30 station)
machine is employed and it is necessary to maintain all plug diameters within about
.015". The stop spacer arrangement 1025 of the instant invention results in considerably
improved controllability in a large machine with multiple stations that previously
required tedious and repeated adjustment of both the form roll and the base pad settings
to maintain the plug diameter within acceptable limits.
[0046] Figure 13 is another graph depicting another run where the flange width and plug
diameter were measured on each can and the average width and diameter were plotted
against base pad position. This shows that the plug diameter changes little while
the flange width changes directly as a function of base pad position.
[0047] It will be readily seen by one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention
fulfills all of the objects set forth above. After reading the foregoing specification,
one of ordinary skill will be able to effect various changes, substitutions of equivalents
and various other aspects of the invention as broadly disclosed herein. It is therefore
intended that the protection granted hereon be limited only by the definition contained
in the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
1. Apparatus for necking-in an open end of a side wall of a container body, comprising:
a) a first member and a second member mounted for engaging inside surfaces of the
container side wall defining said open end;
b) means for rotating said container body;
c) externally located means mounted for radially inward movement into deforming contact
with an outside surface of said container side wall in a region thereof overlying
an interface between said first and second members, whereby contact between said externally
located means with said side wall causes the contacted wall portion to move radially
inwardly into a gap formed at the interface caused by axial separation of said first
and second members under the action of the radially inward advancing movement of the
externally located means into the gap to thereby neck-in said side wall; and
d) stop means for limiting axial movement of said first member to thereby stop the
radially inward advancing movement of the externally located means.
2. Apparatus of claim 1, further comprising means, controlled by sensing radially inward
movement of the externally located means, for initiating gradual axial separation
of said first and second members before said externally located means acts directly
on both said first and second members through the contacted portion.
3. Apparatus of claim 2, wherein
said first member is a slide roll engaging the inside of the container side wall
open end and mounted for driven rotary motion about, and axial movement along, the
container axis, and including resilient means for biasing said slide roll into the
container open end;
said second member is an axially fixed second roll mounted in axially inwardly
spaced relation to the slide roll for engagement with an inside surface of the container
side wall, said second roll having a conical end surface which faces the open end
of the container and said slide roll including a conical end surface facing the conical
end surface of the second roll, said conical surfaces extending in opposite inclinations
to each other;
said externally located means is a form roll having a peripheral deforming nose
positioned externally of the container side wall and mounted for free rotary and controlled
radial movement towards and away from the side wall, said form roll being biased for
axial movement along an axis parallel to the container axis, said form roll deforming
nose including first and second oppositely inclined conical surfaces which are respectively
opposed to the conical surface on the second roll and the conical surface on the slide
roll.
4. Apparatus of claim 3, wherein said stop means includes a stop spacer axially fixedly
mounted rearwardly of the slide roll to engage the slide roll during rearward axial
movement thereof to thereby prevent further axial movement.
5. Apparatus of claim 1, further comprising means, controlled by sensing radially inward
movement of the externally located means, for initiating gradual axial separation
of said first and second members before said externally located means acts directly
on both said first and second members through the contacted portion, wherein said
stop means includes a stop spacer axially fixedly mounted rearwardly of the slide
roll to engage the slide roll during rearward axial movement thereof to thereby prevent
further axial movement.
6. A method of spin flow necking-in an open end of a cylindrical container body, comprising
the steps of:
a) positioning inside the container body, in axial inwardly spaced relation from the
open end thereof, an axially fixed roll engageable with an inside surface of the container
body, said axially fixed roll having a sloped end surface which faces the open end;
b) positioning inside the container body a slide roll which fits the inside diameter
of the container body to support the same, said slide roll having an end facing the
sloped end surface of said axially fixed roll, and said slide roll being supported
for axial displacement away from said axially fixed roll, said slide roll end and
said sloped end surface of said axially fixed roll defining a gap therebetween;
c) positioning opposite said gap on an outside surface of the container body a roller
supported for axial displacement away from said axially fixed roll, said roller having
a trailing end portion and a peripheral portion;
d) spinning the container body thusly supported by said slide roll and advancing said
roller radially inwardly relative to said gap so that said trailing end portion presented
by the roller and said sloped end surface of said axially fixed roll engage a container
body between them while said trailing end portion of said roller moves inwardly along
said sloped end surface of said axially fixed roll to roll a neck into the container
body; and
e) continuing to spin the container body while the roller moves inwardly and the slide
roll retracts axially until the roller has spun an outwardly extending portion on
the end portion of the container body engaged between said slide roll and said roller;
and
f) stopping the radially inward movement of the roller in step (e) by preventing further
axial retraction of the slide roll at a predetermined location.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the axial retracting movement of the slide roll is
controlled by contact between a surface of the roller with a cam follower surface
controlling such axial retraction of said slide roll.
8. A metal container, comprising a bottom wall and a cylindrical side wall projecting
upwardly therefrom, an upper portion of said cylindrical side wall including a necked-in
portion of reduced diameter relative to the remainder of the side wall, said necked-in
portion being formed by:
a) positioning inside the container side wall, in axial inwardly spaced relation from
the open end thereof, an axially fixed roll engageable with an inside surface of the
container side wall, said axially fixed roll having a sloped end surface which faces
the open end;
b) positioning inside the container side wall a slide roll which fits the inside diameter
of the container side wall to support the same, said slide roll having an end facing
the sloped end surface of said axially fixed roll, and said slide roll being supported
for axial displacement away from said axially fixed roll, said slide roll end and
said sloped end surface of said axially fixed roll defining a gap therebetween;
c) positioning opposite said gap on an outside surface of the container side wall
a roller supported for axial displacement away from said axially fixed roll, said
roller having a trailing end portion and a peripheral portion;
d) spinning the container side wall thusly supported by said slide roll and advancing
said roller radially inwardly relative to said gap so that said trailing end portion
presented by the roller and said sloped end surface of said axially fixed roll engage
the container between them while said trailing end portion of said roller moves inwardly
along said sloped end surface of said axially fixed roll to roll a neck into the container
side wall; and
e) continuing to spin the container side wall while the roller moves inwardly and
the slide roll retracts axially until the roller has spun an outwardly extending portion
on the end portion of the container side wall engaged between said slide roll and
said roller; and
f) stopping the radially inward movement of the roller in step (e) by preventing further
axial retraction of the slide roll at a predetermined location.