TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention relates to detergent compositions in tablet form containing
nonionic surfactants.
BACKGROUND AND PRIOR ART
[0002] Detergent compositions in tablet form have been known for many years although the
form has never achieved great popularity in the market. Tablets have various advantages
over powdered products: for example, they do not require measuring and so are easier
to dose, and they can be more economically stored as they are compact.
[0003] Detergent tablets are generally made by compressing or compacting a detergent powder.
It has proved difficult to strike a balance between tablet strength and the ability
to disintegrate and disperse in the wash liquor. Tablets formed using only a light
compaction pressure tend to crumble and break up on handling and packing; while more
strongly compacted tablets may be sufficiently cohesive but will then fail to disperse
at a sufficient rate and to an adequate extent in the wash liquor.
[0004] Nonionic surfactants have beneficial cleaning characteristics when included in detergent
formulations, especially in removing oily soil from fabrics. However, when in contact
with aqueous solutions nonionic surfactants tend to form viscous phases which impede
dissolution. In tablets the problem is exacerbated.
[0005] The problem with poor dissolution and dispersability has proved especially acute
with tablets formed by compressing powders containing water-insoluble builders such
as alkali metal aluminosilicates.
[0006] Detergent tablets containing nonionic surfactants have been disclosed in the art.
[0007] EP 355 626A (Henkel) discloses a detergent tablet containing zeolites, builder salts,
anionic surfactants and nonionic surfactants. The tablet is made by mixing two preformed
components (A) and (B), wherein (A) contains the whole amount of anionic surfactant
and (B) contains 75-100 wt% of the nonionic surfactant. The tablets are claimed to
have good resistance to breaking up prior to use yet dissolve quickly in the washing
machine.
[0008] A detergent tablet containing a detergency builder and anionic detergent active has
been disclosed in EP 466 485A (Unilever). The problem of poor dissolution is substantially
alleviated by ensuring that the anionic detergent-active compounds present are not
distributed widely through the tablet, but are concentrated in discrete domains within
a continuous phase containing little or no anionic detergent-active compound. Nonionic
surfactants may optionally be treated similarly.
[0009] It has now been discovered that the difficulty of producing robust tablets containing
nonionic surfactants which dissolve and disintegrate quickly in the wash, without
the need for any processing modifications or special segregation procedures, can be
alleviated by the use of nonionic surfactants of strictly controlled alkyl chain length.
This measure can also provide detergency benefits.
[0010] Particulate detergent compositions containing short-chain nonionic surfactants are
disclosed in GB 1 460 646, GB 1 462 133, GB 1 462 134, GB 1 485 316 and GB 1 566 326
(Procter & Gamble; GB 1 519 433 and FR 2 303 850A (Rhone-Poulenc); EP 200 953A and
WO 91 10718A (Henkel). However, the use of short-chain nonionic surfactants in detergent
tablets to improve their disintegration and dissolution characteristics is not disclosed.
[0011] EP-A-481793 discloses detergent tablets formed from a compressed particulate detergent
composition in which nonionic surfactant may be condensation products of linear or
branched aliphatic C
8-20 primary or secondary alcohols with ethylene oxide. Preferred are C
12-15 primary and secondary alcohols ethoxylated with an average of from 5 to 20 moles
of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol.
DEFINITION OF THE INVENTION
[0012] The present invention accordingly provides a tablet of compacted detergent powder
comprising a surfactant system comprising a nonionic surfactant, which comprises a
condensation product of ethylene oxide with aliphatic alcohol, at least one detergency
builder and optionally other detergent ingredients, characterised in that at least
25% by weight of the alcohol from which the nonionic condensation product is derived
has an alkyl chain length below C
12, so that the average alkyl chain length is below C
12.
[0013] The invention further provides the use of a nonionic surfactant which is a condensation
product of ethylene oxide with an aliphatic alcohol having an average alkyl chain
length of less than C
12, and in which at least 25% by weight of the alcohol from which the nonionic condensation
product is derived has an alkyl chain length below C
12, to improve the disintegration and dissolution in the wash liquor of a tablet of
compacted detergent powder.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The Nonionic Surfactant
[0014] The detergent tablet of the invention is characterised in that its surfactant system
comprises ethoxylated nonionic surfactant having an average alkyl chain length of
less than C
12. This component will be referred to hereinafter as the short-chain nonionic surfactant.
[0015] Commercial nonionic surfactants are generally mixtures containing a spread of chain
lengths around an average value. Preferably the surfactant system is free of nonionic
surfactants which are commercial materials having an average chain length of C
12 and above.
[0016] Preferably the short-chain nonionic surfactant is derived from an alcohol of which
at least 50 wt% and most preferably at least 75 wt%, has an alkyl chain length below
C
12. Advantageously the surfactant system may be substantially free of any nonionic surfactant
material having a chain length of C
12 or above.
[0017] Especially preferred are ethoxylated alcohol nonionic surfactants having an average
alkyl chain length from C
9 to C
11.5.
[0018] The average number of ethylene oxide groups per mole of alcohol in the short-chain
nonionic surfactant is preferably 8 or less, more preferably from 2 to 6.5, and advantageously
from 2.5 to 6.
[0019] The short-chain nonionic surfactant may consist wholly of straight-chain material,
or may contain branched-chain material. Branched chain nonionic surfactants may advantageously
give faster dissolution rates than their wholly straight chain counterparts.
[0020] It is preferred if the level of free alcohol in the short-chain nonionic surfactant
is as low as possible: preferably less than 5 wt% and more preferably less than 1
wt% of the total nonionic surfactant.
[0021] Details of some short-chain nonionic surfactants suitable for use in the present
invention are given below (* denotes Trade Mark). Mixtures of these materials may
also be used in order to achieve intermediate degrees of ethoxylation.
Dobanol* 91 series ex Shell
[0022]
| Ethoxylates: |
Dobanol 91-2.5 |
2.5 EO |
| |
Dobanol 91-5 |
5 EO |
| |
Dobanol 91-6 |
6 EO |
| |
Dobanol 91 4-6 |
4-6 EO |
Nominal description: C
9-11 alcohol with 20-25% branching (C
1-C
4).
Average chain length: 10.14
Chain length distribution:
| C8 |
linear |
0.7 |
0.7 |
| C9 |
linear |
17.5 |
19.0 |
| |
C8 2-methyl |
1.0 |
|
| |
C7 2-ethyl |
0.3 |
|
| |
C6 2-propyl |
0.2 |
|
| C10 |
linear |
40.7 |
45.8 |
| |
C9 2-methyl |
2.9 |
|
| |
C8 2-ethyl |
1.0 |
|
| |
other branched |
1.2 |
|
| C11 |
linear |
25.5 |
33.3 |
| |
C10 2-methyl |
2.4 |
|
| |
C9 2-ethyl |
1.0 |
|
| |
Other branched |
4.4 |
|
| C12 |
linear |
0 |
1.6 |
| |
branched |
1.6 |
|
Lialet* 111 series ex Enichem
[0023]
| Ethoxylates: |
Lialet 111-4 |
4 EO |
| |
Lialet 111-5 |
5 EO |
| |
Lialet 111-6 |
6 EO |
| |
Lialet 111 4-6 |
4-6 EO |
| |
Lialet 111 6.9 |
6.9 EO |
Nominal description: C
11 alcohol with 50-60% branching (C
1-C
4).
Average chain length: 11.0
Chain length distribution:
| C11 |
linear |
49.2 |
96.10 |
| |
C10 2-methyl |
17.3 |
|
| |
C9 2-ethyl |
9.3 |
|
| |
C8 2-propyl |
9.7 |
|
| |
C7 2-butyl and C6 2-pentyl |
10.6 |
|
Vista* (Alfonic*) series ex Vista Chemicals
[0024]
| Ethoxylates: |
Vista 1012-62 |
6.25 EO |
| |
Vista 1012-52 |
4.3 EO |
| |
Vista Novel II 1012-52 |
4.5 EO (narrow range) |
Nominal description: C
10-12 linear alcohol
Average chain length: 10.20
Chain length distribution:
| C10 |
linear |
90.0 |
| C12 |
linear |
10.0 |
Other short-chain nonionic surfactants
[0025] The following materials are also suitable for use in the present invention:
Acropol* 91 4-6 ex Exxon:
C9-11 chain, 35% branching (C1-4), 4-6 EO
Dobanol* 111 series ex Shell:
98.5% C11, with traces of C10 and C12
Synperonic* 91-4-6 ex ICI:
C9-11 chain, 60% branching (C1), 4-6 EO
Lialet* 91 4-6 ex Enichem:
C9-11 chain, 60% branching (C1-4), 4-6 EO
Inbentin* C10E4 ex Kolb:
C10 linear chain, 4 EO
[0026] Longer-chain commercial nonionic surfactants which are preferably absent from the
tablets of the invention include the following materials:
Coconut-based materials such as the Lorodac* series ex DAC Chemicals:
C
12-C
16, average chain length 12.75
Synperonic* nonionics ex ICI, eg Synperonic A3 (3EO):
C
13-15, average chain length 13.65:
| C13 |
linear |
44.0 |
67.2 |
| |
C12 2-methyl |
11.9 |
|
| |
C11 2-ethyl |
3.8 |
|
| |
C10 2-propyl |
3.1 |
|
| |
C9 2-butyl and C8 2-pentyl |
4.4 |
|
| C15 |
linear |
20.9 |
35.1 |
| |
C14 2-methyl |
2.4 |
|
| |
C13 2-ethyl |
1.0 |
|
| |
C12 2-propyl |
0.8 |
|
| |
C11 2-butyl and C10 2-pentyl and C9 2-hexyl |
2.4 |
|
Dobanol* 23 materials ex Shell (C
12-13 with 18.1% branching):
| C12 |
38.4 |
| C13 |
58.9 |
| C14 |
1.2 |
Dobanol* 25 materials ex Shell (C
12-15 with 22.9% branching):
| C12 |
19.9 |
| C13 |
31.2 |
| C14 |
29.4 |
| C15 |
19.1 |
Dobanol* 45 materials ex shell (C
14-15 with 14.8% branching):
Incorporation of nonionic surfactant in the tablets
[0027] The nonionic surfactants may be concentrated in discrete domains as disclosed in
EP 466 485A (Unilever). Since the nonionic detergent compounds are generally liquids,
these domains are preferably formed from particulate carrier material impregnated
by the nonionic detergent-active compound. Suitable carrier materials include zeolite;
zeolite granulated with other materials, for example Wessalith CS (Trade Mark), Wessalith
CD (Trade Mark), Vegabond GB (Trade Mark); sodium perborate monohydrate; Burkeite
(a spray-dried sodium carbonate/sodium sulphate double salt) as disclosed in EP 221
776A (Unilever).
[0028] Other so-called nonionic detergent compounds which may be present in the tablet such
as long-chain tertiary amine oxides, tertiary phosphine oxides, and dialkyl sulphoxides.
[0029] Nonionic detergent-active compounds may be present in the tablet at an amount from
2 to 50 wt%, preferably from 5 to 30 wt%.
Other detergent-active compounds
[0030] The tablets of the invention may contain other surfactants, provided that longer-chain
ethoxylated nonionic surfactants are not present in such amounts that the average
alkyl chain length of the total nonionic surfactant rises to C
12 or above.
[0031] The total amount of detergent-active material in the tablet of the invention is suitably
from 5 to 50% wt%, preferably from 5 to 30 wt%.
[0032] Detergent-active material present other than the nonionic surfactants may be other
anionic (soap or non-soap), cationic, zwitterionic, amphoteric, or any combination
of these.
[0033] Anionic detergent-active compounds may be present in an amount of from 0 to 40 wt%,
preferably from 0 to 20 wt%. It is preferred if the ratio of nonionic surfactant to
anionic surfactant is within the range of 2:8 to 9:1.
[0034] Synthetic anionic surfactants are well known to those skilled in the art. Examples
include alkylbenzene sulphonates, particularly sodium linear alkylbenzene sulphonates
having an alkyl chain length of C8-C15; primary and secondary alkyl sulphates, particularly
sodium C12-C15 primary alcohol sulphates, olefin sulphonates; alkane sulphonates;
dialkyl sulphosuccinate; and fatty acid ester sulphonates.
[0035] It may also be desirable to include one or more soaps of fatty acids. These are preferably
sodium soaps derived from naturally occurring fatty acids, for example, the fatty
acids from coconut oil, beef tallow, sunflower or hardened rapeseed oil.
[0036] A preferred embodiment of the invention contains alkyl sulphate, preferably primary
alkyl sulphate (PAS), as the anionic surfactant. Branched PAS, for example as described
in EP 439 316A (Unilever), may be preferred.
[0037] An especially preferred embodiment of the invention contains a PAS adjunct wherein
the PAS is on a carrier as described previously for nonionic surfactants.
Detergency builders
[0038] The detergent tablets of the invention contain one or more detergency builders, suitably
in an amount of from 5 to 80 wt%, preferably from 20 to 60 wt%.
[0039] The invention is of especial relevance to tablets derived from detergent compositions
containing alkali metal aluminosilicates and/or alkali metal carbonate as builders,
since such tablets appear to have a particular tendency to harden and so exhibit disintegration
and dispersion problems.
[0040] Alkali metal (preferably sodium) aluminosilicates may suitably be incorporated in
amounts of from 5 to 60% by weight (anhydrous basis) of the composition, and may be
either crystalline or amorphous or mixtures thereof, having the general formula:
0.8-1.5 Na
2O. Al
2O
3.0.8-6 SiO
2
[0041] These materials contain some bound water and are required to have a calcium ion exchange
capacity of at least 50 mg CaO/g. The preferred sodium aluminosilicates contain 1.5-3.5
SiO2 units (in the formula above). Both the amorphous and the crystalline materials
can be prepared readily by reaction between sodium silicate and sodium aluminate,
as amply described in the literature.
[0042] Suitable crystalline sodium aluminosilicate ion-exchange detergency builders are
described, for example, in GB 1 429 143 (Procter & Gamble). The preferred sodium aluminosilicates
of this type are the well-known commercially available zeolites A and X, and mixtures
thereof.
[0043] The zeolite may be the commercially available zeolite 4A now widely used in laundry
detergent powders. However, according to a preferred embodiment of the invention,
the zeolite builder incorporated in the compositions of the invention is maximum aluminium
zeolite P (zeolite MAP) as described and claimed in EP 384 070A (Unilever). Zeolite
MAP is defined as an alkali metal aluminosilicate of the zeolite P type having a silicon
to aluminium ratio not exceeding 1.33, preferably within the range of from 0.90 to
1.33, and more preferably within the range of from 0.90 to 1.20.
[0044] Especially preferred is zeolite MAP having a silicon to aluminium ratio not exceeding
1.07. The calcium binding capacity of zeolite MAP is generally at least 150 mg CaO
per g of anhydrous material.
[0045] In the tablets of the present invention, the use of zeolite MAP gives two particular
advantages: it is a more effective builder than zeolite 4A, and, quite independently,
it enables higher total surfactant levels, and more nonionic-rich surfactant systems,
to be incorporated without processing problems.
[0046] The use of zeolite MAP as a carrier for liquid detergent ingredients is described
and claimed in EP 521 635A (Unilever).
[0047] Preferred zeolite MAP for use in the present invention is especially finely divided
and has a d
50 (as defined below) within the range of from 0.1 to 5.0 microns, more preferably from
0.4 to 2.0 microns and most preferably from 0.4 to 1.0 microns. The quantity "d
50" indicates that 50 wt% of the particles have a diameter smaller than that figure,
and there are corresponding quantities "d
80", "d
90" etc. Especially preferred materials have a d
90 below 3 microns as well as a d
50 below 1 micron.
[0048] Alkali metal carbonates may also be suitably incorporated into the tablets in amounts
from 0 to 60%, preferably from 2 to 40 wt%. The preferred alkali metal carbonate is
that of sodium. An alternative builder system for use within this invention comprises
an alkali metal carbonate/calcite system.
[0049] Other builders may also be included in the detergent tablet of the invention if necessary
or desired: suitable organic or inorganic water-soluble or water-insoluble builders
will readily suggest themselves to the skilled detergent formulator. Inorganic builders
may be present other than the alkali metal carbonates; while organic builders include
polycarboxylate polymers such as polyacrylates, acrylic/maleic copolymers, and acrylic
phosphinates; monomeric polycarboxylates such as citrates, gluconates, oxydisuccinates,
glycerol mono-, di- and trisuccinates, carboxymethyloxysuccinates, carboxymethyloxymalonates,
dipicolinates, hydroxyethyliminodiacetates; polycarboxylate polymers; and organic
precipitant builders such as alkyl- and alkenylmalonates and succinates, and sulphonated
fatty acid salts.
[0050] Especially preferred supplementary builders are polycarboxylate polymers, more especially
polyacrylates and acrylic/maleic copolymers, suitably used in amounts of from 0.5
to 15 wt%, especially from 1 to 10 wt%; and monomeric polycarboxylates, more especially
citric acid and its salts, suitably used in amounts of from 3 to 35 wt%, more preferably
from 5 to 30 wt%.
[0051] Preferred tabletted compositions of the invention preferably do-not contain more
than 5 wt% of inorganic phosphate builders, and are desirably substantially free of
phosphate builders. However, phosphate-built tabletted compositions are also within
the scope of the invention.
Other ingredients
[0052] Fully formulated laundry detergent compositions in accordance with the present invention
may additionally contain any suitable ingredients normally encountered, for example,
inorganic salts such as sodium silicate or sodium sulphate; antiredeposition aids
such as cellulose derivatives and acrylate or acrylate/maleate polymers; fluorescers;
bleaches, bleach precursors and bleach stabilisers; proteolytic and lipolytic enzymes;
dyes; coloured speckles; perfumes; foam controllers; fabric softening compounds.
[0053] As well as the functional detergent ingredients listed above, there may be present
various ingredients specifically to overcome difficulties that occur when tabletting,
examples of such ingredients are; binders, lubricants and disintegrants.
[0054] Tablet lubricants include calcium, magnesium and zinc soaps (especially stearates),
talc, glyceryl behenate, Myvatex (Trade Mark) TL ex Eastman Kodak, sodium benzoate,
sodium acetate, polyethylene glycols, and colloidal silicas (for example, Alusil (Trade
Mark) ex Crosfield Chemicals Ltd).
[0055] Examples of disintegrants include organic materials such as starches, for example,
corn, maize, rice and potato starches and starch derivatives, such as Primojel (Trade
Mark) carboxymethyl starch and Explotab (Trade Mark) sodium starch glycolate; celluloses
and cellulose derivatives, for example, Courlose (Trade Mark) and Nymcel (Trade Mark)
sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, Ac-di-Sol (Trade Mark) cross-linked modified cellulose,
and Hanfloc (Trade Mark) microcrystalline cellulosic fibres; and various synthetic
organic polymers, notably polyethylene glycol and crosslinked polyvinyl pyrrolidone,
for example, Polyplasdone (Trade Mark) XL or Kollidon (Trade Mark) CL, bentonite clay,
citric acid (preferred), malic acid or tartaric acid, in combination with alkali metal
carbonate or bicarbonate.
[0056] Tablet binders are well known in the art and include natural gums (form example acacia,
tragaenth) and sugars (for example glucose, sucrose). As indicated previously, some
ingredients may give both functional wash benefits and tabletting benefits.
Tablet forms
[0057] The detergent tablet of the invention may be, and preferably is, formulated for use
as a complete heavy-duty fabric washing composition.
[0058] The powder used to form the tablets by compaction may contain ingredients having
different mean particle sizes and distributions, but preferably the starting powder
should have an initial granule size in the range 75-1500 micrometres. Depending on
the tabletting compaction pressure employed, the smaller particle sizes give smoother
tablets with lower porosities whereas the larger particle sizes give tablets with
a granular appearance and higher porosities. It is preferred, with the larger particle
sizes, to have present a binder which enables the tablet to be formed at lower compaction
pressures.
[0059] Although one tablet may contain sufficient of every component to provide the correct
amount required for an average washload, it is convenient if each tablet contains
a submultiple quantity of the composition required for average washing conditions,
so that the consumer may vary the dosage according to the size and nature of the washload.
For example, tablet sizes may be chosen such that two tablets are sufficient for an
average washload; one or more further. tablets may be added if the washload is particularly
large or soiled; and one only tablet may be used if the load is small or only lightly
soiled.
[0060] Alternatively, larger subdivisible tablets representing a single or multiple dose
may be provided with scorings or indentations to indicate unit dose or submultiple
unit dose size to the consumer and to provide a weak point to assist the consumer
in breaking the tablet if appropriate.
[0061] The weight of the tablet will suitably range from 10 to 160 g, preferably from 20
to 50 g, depending on the wash conditions under which it is intended to be used, and
whether it represents a single dose, a multiple dose or a submultiple dose.
[0062] The tablet may be of any suitable shape, but for manufacturing and packaging convenience
is preferably of uniform cross-section, for example, circular or rectangular.
[0063] The tablet of the invention may be homogeneous, or may consist of more than one discrete
region: for example, two or more layers of different composition may be present, or
a core region may be wholly surrounded by an outer region of different composition.
[0064] The diameter of the tablet will suitably range from 1 to 10 cm, preferably from 2
to 6 cm.
Tabletting
[0065] As previously indicated, the tablets of the invention are prepared by compaction
of a particulate detergent composition. The preferred bulk density of the detergent
powder is at least 700 g/litre, more preferably 800 g/litre. Any suitable. tabletting
apparatus may be used.
[0066] For any given starting composition, the disintegration time will vary with the compaction
pressure used to form the tablet. If the compaction pressure is too low, the tablet
will tend to crumble and break up in the dry state, on handling and packaging; an
increase in compaction pressure will improve tablet integrity, but eventually at the
expense of disintegration time in the wash liquor.
[0067] Using an Instron (Trade Mark) Universal Testing Machine at constant speed, or a Research
and Industrial screw hand press, to operate a steel punch and die, it has been found
that effective tablets may be produced using compaction pressures ranging from 35
to 1000 Ncm
-2, especially from 75 to 500 Ncm
-2.
[0068] The optimum compaction pressure will depend to some extent on the starting composition;
for example, a formulation containing a high proportion of organic ingredients (for
example, surfactants) and a low proportion of -inorganic salts may require a compaction
pressure lower than that required for a formulation containing a lower proportion
of organic ingredients and a higher proportion of inorganic salts; and a dry-mixed
formulation will generally required a higher pressure than will a spray-dried powder.
[0069] As a measure of the resistance of the tablets to fracture, the diametral fracture
stress σ
o calculated from the following equation:

where σ
o is the diametral fracture stress (Pascals), P is the applied load to cause fracture
(Newtons), D is the tablet diameter (metres) and t is the tablet thickness (metres).
[0070] Tablets of the invention preferably have a diametral fracture stress of at least
5 kPa, and more preferably at least 7 kPa.
EXAMPLES
[0071] The following non-limiting examples illustrate the invention. Parts and percentages
are by weight unless otherwise stated. Examples identified by numbers are in accordance
with the invention while those identified by letters are comparative.
[0072] In the Examples, the following tests were used to assess the dissolution properties
of the tablets.
1 Rotating Cage Test
[0073] Preweighed tablets were placed in a cage of perforated metal gauze (7 cm x 7 cm x
6 cm) having apertures about 5mm square per cm
2. The cage was then suspended in a beaker of demineralised water at 23°C and rotated
at 80 rpm. The mass of tablet dissolved was calculated by a standard conductance procedure
which involved measuring the conductance of the water at a given time and comparing
this reading with that obtained from a fully dissolved powder of identical formulation
and weight.
[0074] It is preferable if the tablet is capable of dissolving to an extent of 60% by weight
in 15 minutes. More preferably the tablet will be capable of dissolving to an extent
of 75% by weight in 15 minutes.
2 Machine Test A
[0075] The dissolution of the tablets was studied in a Miele W756 front-loading automatic
washing machine. The tablet was placed in the drum of the machine, the machine was
programmed on the economy main wash with a cold water fill (10.5 litres demineralised
water, isothermal at 11°C). No load was present. The percentage of the tablet dissolved
was calculated using the standard conductance procedure described above.
3 Machine Test B
[0076] Tablets were placed in an experimental perspex washing machine. The programme of
the washing machine was based upon the cotton cycle of the Spanish Zanussi (using
10 litres of cold Wirral water). The times taken for 50% and 90% of the tablet to
dissolve were recorded. The standard conductance test as described above was used
to calculate the weight of tablet dissolved.
Examples 1-4 and Comparative Examples A-D
[0077] Detergent base powders were prepared to the following general formulation:
| Base powder |
wt% |
| Zeolite |
51.2 |
| Sodium citrate |
8.5 |
| Water |
14.8 |
| Postdosed |
|
| Nonionic surfactant |
25.5 |
[0078] The base powders were prepared by spray-drying. The nonionic surfactant was then
stirred into the base powder and fluid bed mixed for 10 minutes at 70°C, and the powders
were then allowed to weather. The tablets were produced using the Instron Universal
Testing Machine at constant speed. Tablets so produced had end fracture strengths
of 5 or 15 kPa and respectively thicknesses of 12.2 mm or 10.8 mm.
The nonionic surfactants used were as described below:
| Example |
Nonionic surfactant |
| Examples A and B |
Synperonic A7 (ICI) |
| Examples C and D |
Coco 6.5 EO (Kolb) |
| Examples 1 and 2 |
Dobanol 91-6 T (Shell) |
| Examples 3 and 4 |
Alfonic 1012-62 (Vista) |
[0079] Details of these nonionic surfactants have been given earlier in the text.
[0080] Dissolution results using the rotating cage test described previously are set out
in Table 1.
Table 1
| Example |
Fracture Stress |
Weight Tablet Dissolved (%) after |
| |
|
3 min |
7 min |
11 min |
15 min |
| A |
5 kPa |
9 |
19 |
35 |
49 |
| B |
15 kPa |
6 |
18 |
34 |
43 |
| |
| C |
5 kPa |
13 |
30 |
57 |
72 |
| D |
15 kPa |
7 |
29 |
42 |
50 |
| |
| 1 |
5 kPa |
58 |
83 |
97 |
100 |
| 2 |
15 kPa |
36 |
59 |
73 |
85 |
| |
| 3 |
5 kPa |
55 |
82 |
97 |
100 |
| 4 |
15 kPa |
30 |
58 |
71 |
82 |
[0081] It must be appreciated that the rotating cage experiment is a rigorous test, as mechanical
agitation is minimal and dissolution is mainly due to physico-chemical effects.
[0082] A more realistic approach is to study the dissolution in a washing machine, using
Machine Test A described previously.
Table 2
| Example |
Weight Tablet dissolved (%) after (min) |
| |
0.5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| A |
32.8 |
70.2 |
83.8 |
88.1 |
90.2 |
91.9 |
| B |
35.6 |
61.4 |
75.6 |
80.5 |
82.9 |
84.8 |
| |
| C |
30.8 |
66.3 |
83.3 |
88.6 |
91.4 |
92.7 |
| D |
37.9 |
58.4 |
77.8 |
83.1 |
86.6 |
89.3 |
| |
| 1 |
30.7 |
68.6 |
86.6 |
90.9 |
92.6 |
93.6 |
| 2 |
35.2 |
62.4 |
83.3 |
90.0 |
93.7 |
95.1 |
| |
| 3 |
34.2 |
67.4 |
87.7 |
93.1 |
94.8 |
95.5 |
| 4 |
34.2 |
64.8 |
84.1 |
90.8 |
93.9 |
96.4 |
Examples 5-8 and Comparative Examples E and F
[0084] The base powders were produced by spray-drying, and further ingredients were post
dosed. Tablets were produced using the Instron Universal Testing Machine at constant
speed. The tablets had fracture strengths of 5 kPa and 15 kPa with tablet thicknesses
of 18.5 mm and 16.6 mm respectively.
[0085] The tablets were placed in a Miele W756 washing machine and the amount of tablet
dissolution measured using Machine Test A. The results are shown in Table 3.
Table 3
| Example |
Fracture Stress |
Amount tablet dissolved (%) after |
| |
|
0.5 min |
1 min |
3 min |
5 min |
| E |
5 kPa |
19 |
46 |
83 |
91 |
| F |
15 kPa |
16 |
31 |
56 |
66 |
| |
| 5 |
5 kPa |
20 |
51 |
94 |
98 |
| 6 |
15 kPa |
17 |
36 |
67 |
80 |
[0086] The tablets containing Dobanol 91.6T, a short chain nonionic, dissolved faster than
the tablet containing Synperonic A7, a longer chain nonionic, at both high and low
fracture strengths.
[0087] After 8 minutes the machine cycle was stopped and the residue of the tablet removed
from the drum, dried and weighed. This procedure was repeated three times for each
tablet. The mean residue was calculated as a percentage of the original tablet's weight.
The results are shown in Table 4.
Table 4
| Example |
Mean residue % (% of original weight) |
| E |
1.3 |
| F |
32.3 |
| |
| 7 |
0 |
| 8 |
7.3 |
[0088] The results clearly show that the dissolution and disintegration of tablets containing
short chain nonionic surfactants was faster than those containing longer chain nonionic
surfactants.
Example 9 and Comparative Example G
[0089] Spray-dried powders were made to the following formulations:
| |
Example G |
Example 9 |
| Base powder |
wt% |
wt% |
| Zeolite 4A |
30 |
30 |
| Sodium citrate |
5 |
5 |
| Synperonic A7 |
10.22 |
0.22 |
| Dobanol 91-5 |
- |
10.00 |
| Water |
8.7 |
8.7 |
| Postdosed |
|
|
| Perborate monohydrate |
14 |
14 |
| TAED (83%) |
7.4 |
7.4 |
| Calcium EDTMP (33%) |
0.37 |
0.37 |
| Antifoam granule |
3.0 |
3.0 |
| Savinase |
1.1 |
1.1 |
| Sodium carbonate |
13.0 |
13.0 |
| PAS noodles |
6.7 |
6.7 |
| |

|

|
[0090] * 89-90% Coconut PAS (Empicol LZV/E Trade Mark ex Albright & Wilson), as described
in EP 466 485A (Unilever).
[0091] Tablets were manufactured on the Instron using the 45mm diameter die and 45g of powder.
[0092] Dissolution rates were measured by Machine Test B described previously, and were
as shown in Table 5.
Table 5
| Example |
Fracture Stress (kPa) |
Time for 50% to dissolve (min) |
Time for 90% to dissolve (min) |
| G |
16.3 |
4.75 |
13 |
| 9 |
16.2 |
3.75 |
8.5 |
[0093] Table 5 demonstrates that short chain nonionic surfactants improve dissolution rates
in a mixed surfactant system.
Examples 10 and 11
[0094] Tablets were compacted from detergent compositions as described below, at a compaction
pressure of 15 kPa.

[0095] Machine Test A, as described previously, was used to determine dissolution properties.
The results, compared with Comparative Example B (see previously), are shown in Table
6.
Table 6
| |
Mean residue (% Weight of original tablet) |
| Example B |
39.7 |
| Example 10 |
7.4 |
| Example 11 |
9.2 |
[0096] It is again demonstrated that even in the presence of PAS adjunct the presence of
a short chain nonionic decreases the dissolution rate and so decreases the residue
of tablet in the machine drum.
Example 12
[0097] Tablets were prepared by compaction of a high bulk density detergent powder having
the following formulation (in weight %):
| Nonionic base granule |
|
| Dobanol 91-6T |
8.3-8.9 |
| Zeolite 4A |
28.2-29.6 |
| Sodium carbonate |
14.2-15.1 |
| Acrylic/maleic copolymer |
4.3-4.6 |
| SCMC |
0.5 |
| Fluorescers |
0.21 |
| Polyethylene glycol 1500 |
2.4-6.0 |
| Moisture |
7.0-7.4 |
| PAS adjunct |
|
| (see earlier Examples) |
5.7 |
| Postdosed ingredients |
|
| Sodium perborate monohydrate |
14.0 |
| TAED granules |
7.4 |
| Calcium EDTMP |
0.4 |
| Antifoam granules |
3.0 |
| Perfume |
0.5 |
| Protease granules |
0.8 |
| Lipolase granules |
0.2 |
[0098] The method of preparation of the powder was as follows. A nonionic base granule was
prepared by granulating the sodium carbonate (light ash) and zeolite 4A with the Dobanol
91-6T, aqueous polyacrylic acid, SCMC and fluorescers in a batch high-speed mixer/granulator
(Fukae (Trade Mark) FS100), followed by drying in a batch fluid bed dryer, screening
to a 250-1700 micron fraction.
[0099] The dried granular material was coated with the polyethylene glycol 1500 by spraying
it on as a melt, from a pressurised kettle maintained at 60-70°C, in a batch rotary
mixer, and screened again to remove oversize material.
[0100] The PAS adjunct, which had the formulation given in Examples 10 and 11, was prepared
by dry neutralisation: PAS acid was sprayed onto zeolite and carbonate and neutralised
in situ by the carbonate. This too was screened to 250-1700 micrometres.
[0101] The nonionic base granule, the PAS adjunct and the remaining ingredients were mixed
together in a batch rotary mixer.
[0102] Tabletting was carried out using the Manesty single punch eccentric press (Thomson
and Capper, Runcorn, Cheshire, England). The tablets, of thickness 45 mm and diameter
29.1-29.3 mm and each containing 50 g of powder, generally had fracture strengths
of 10-13 kPa.
[0103] The tablets exhibited excellent dissolution characteristics and cleaning performance.
Examples 13 and 14, Comparative Examples H and J
[0104] In this experiment, mixed nonionic surfactant systems having different average chain
lengths were used.
[0105] 25 g and 50 g tablets were prepared, as in earlier Examples, by compacting high bulk
density detergent powders. Nonionic surfactants were adsorbed onto Wessalith (Trade
Mark) CD, a commercial zeolite 4A/polyacrylate granulated carrier material ex Degussa,
at a level of 25.5 wt%, and the postdosed ingredients used in Examples 5-8 (37.9 wt%)
admixed. The tablets were prepared to a strength of 15 kPa.
[0106] The nonionic surfactants used were as follows:

[0107] The tablets (2 x 50 g or 4 x 25 g) were used in a 40°C wool wash (low agitation)
in the Miele machine, with a 1.4 kilo clean load. The water inlet temperature was
20°C. The tablets were dosed in a dispensing device of the type used for high bulk
density powders. The following residues (g) were found in the dispensing device at
the end of the main wash (each result being the mean of three values):
| H |
4 x 25 g |
36.1 |
| |
2 x 50 g |
43.1 |
| |
| J |
4 x 25 g |
26.0 |
| |
2 x 50 g |
31.4 |
| |
| 13 |
4 x 25 g |
4.2 |
| |
2 x 50 g |
13.0 |
| |
| 14 |
4 x 25 g |
9.9 |
| |
2 x 50 g |
26.7 |
[0108] These results show the benefit of reducing the average alkyl chain length of the
nonionic surfactant system. The benefit is especially marked with the smaller (25
g) tablets.
[0109] In Machine Test A (the economy wash), in which the agitation is high, the following
residues (g) were found in the drum of the Miele machine after 5 minutes, were obtained,
each result being the mean of three values:
| H |
4 x 25 g |
6.4 |
| |
2 x 50 g |
11.8 |
| |
| 13 |
4 x 25 g |
2.2 |
| |
2 x 50 g |
2.3 |
[0110] Thus the benefits of using short-chain nonionic surfactant are also observed in a
high-agitation wash.
Examples 15 and 16, Comparative Example K
[0111] Tablets were prepared, as generally described in Example 12, to the following formulations
(in parts by weight), the sodium perborate, TAED, calcium EDTMP and antifoam granules
being postdosed:
| |
K |
15 |
16 |
| CocoPAS |
5.7 |
5.7 |
1.2 |
| Nonionic surfactant: |
|
|
|
| Synperonic A7 |
9.0 |
- |
- |
| Dobanol 91-6T |
- |
9.0 |
10.5 |
| Zeolite 4A |
31.2 |
31.2 |
35.2 |
| Sodium carbonate |
14.8 |
14.8 |
17.1 |
| Polyethylene glycol 1500 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
| Acrylic/maleic copolymer |
4.6 |
4.6 |
4.6 |
| Sodium perborate monohydrate |
14.0 |
14.0 |
14.0 |
| TAED |
7.4 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
| Calcium EDTMP |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
| Antifoam granules |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
| Moisture |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
[0112] The tablets were prepared to strengths ranging from 9 to 14 kPA, using the Manesty
machine used in Example 12.
[0113] The tablets showed the following properties, test methods being as described in earlier
Examples:
| |
Tablet strength |
T90 in economy wash |
Residue in wool wash (g) |
| K |
9 kPa |
3.5-5.5 |
5-20 g |
| 15 |
12 kPa |
3.5-5.0 |
5-10 g |
| 16 |
14 kPa |
3.5-5.0 |
5-10 g |
1. Tablette aus verdichtetem Waschpulver, umfassend ein Tensidsystem, das ein nichtionisches
Tensid, welches ein Kondensationsprodukt von Ethylenoxid mit aliphatischem Alkohol
umfaßt, mindestens einen Waschmittelbuilder und gegebenenfalls weitere Waschmittelbestandteile
umfaßt, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß mindestens 25 Gew.-% des Alkohols, von dem das
nichtionische Kondensationsprodukt abgeleitet ist, eine Alkylkettenlänge unterhalb
C12 aufweist, so daß die mittlere Alkylkettenlänge unterhalb C12 liegt.
2. Waschmitteltablette nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß mindestens 50 Gew.-%
des Alkohols, von dem das nichtionische Kondensationsprodukt abgeleitet ist, eine
Alkylkettenlänge unterhalb C12 aufweist.
3. Waschmitteltablette nach Anspruch 2, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß mindestens 75 Gew.-%
des Alkohols, von dem das nichtionische Kondensationsprodukt abgeleitet ist, eine
Alkylkettenlänge unterhalb C12 aufweist.
4. Waschmitteltablette nach einem vorangehenden Anspruch, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß
sie im wesentlichen frei von ethoxyliertem nichtionischem Tensid mit einer Alkylkettenlänge
von C12 oder darüber ist.
5. Waschmitteltablette nach einem vorangehenden Anspruch, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß
das nichtionische Kondensationsprodukt eine mittlere Alkylkettenlänge im Bereich C9 bis C11,5 aufweist.
6. Waschmitteltablette nach einem vorangehenden Anspruch, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß
der mittlere Ethoxylierungsgrad des Kondensationsprodukts 8 oder geringer ist.
7. Waschmitteltablette nach Anspruch 6, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß der mittlere Ethoxylierungsgrad
des nichtionischen Kondensationsprodukts im Bereich 2 bis 6,5 liegt.
8. Waschmitteltablette nach Anspruch 7, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß der mittlere Ethoxylierungsgrad
des nichtionischen Kondensationsprodukts im Bereich 2,5 bis 6 liegt.
9. Waschmitteltablette nach einem vorangehenden Anspruch, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß
das Tensidsystem außerdem anionisches Tensid umfaßt.
10. Waschmitteltablette nach Anspruch 9, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß das anionische Tensid
primäres Alkylsulfat umfaßt.
11. Waschmitteltablette nach einem vorangehenden Anspruch, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß
sie das Verdichtungsprodukt eines teilchenförmigen Mittels mit einer anfänglichen
Schüttdichte von mindestens 700 g/l ist.
12. Waschmitteltablette nach einem vorangehenden Anspruch, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß
sie 5 bis 80 Gew.-% (auf wasserfreier Grundlage) eines Alkalimetallaluminosilicats
umfaßt.
13. Waschmitteltablette nach einem vorangehenden Anspruch, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß
sie beim hier beschriebenen Drehkäfigauflösungstest in einem Ausmaß von 60 Gew.-%
in 15 Minuten in Wasser bei 23°C aufgelöst werden kann.
14. Verwendung eines nichtionischen Tensids, das ein Kondensationsprodukt von Ethylenoxid
mit einem aliphatischen Alkohol, der eine mittlere Alkylkettenlänge von weniger als
C12 aufweist, ist, und wobei mindestens 25 Gew.-% des Alkohols, von dem das nichtionische
Kondensationsprodukt abgeleitet ist, eine Alkylkettenlänge unterhalb C12 aufweist, zur Verbesserung des Zerfalls und der Auflösung einer aus Waschpulver verdichteten
Tablette in der Waschlauge.