[0001] This is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. Patent Application Serial No.
976,122 filed November 30, 1992 which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S.
Patent Application Serial No. 983,017 filed November 13, 1992.
Field of the Invention
[0002] The present invention is generally directed to heat shrinkable films containing single
site catalyzed copolymers which include at least some long chain branching.
Background of the Invention
[0003] Shrinkable thermoplastic films have found many useful applications in packaging of
meats, cheeses, poultry and numerous other food and non-food products. There is always
the search for improvement in these films to make them have better impact resistance,
improved optics and improved shrinkability. For example, in U.S. Patent No. 4,640,856
to Ferguson et al., the multilayer thermoplastic heat shrinkable film was described
having improved shrink, toughness and barrier properties. The film included at least
one layer of a very low density polyethylene and a gas barrier layer of vinylidene
chloride copolymer or ethylene vinyl alcohol. The film was found to be particularly
useful for making bags for packaging large cuts of fresh red meat.
[0004] U.S. Patent Nos. 5,059,481, 4,976,898 and 4,863,769, all to Lustig et al., disclose
heat shrinkable film suitable for packaging food articles such as frozen poultry,
primal meat cuts and processed meat products wherein the film may be a biaxially stretched
monolayer film of a very low density polyethylene copolymer or a multilayer film containing
very low density polyethylene.
[0005] U.S. Patent No. 4,457,960 to Newsome discloses the use of linear low density polyethylene
in multiple layer molecularly oriented films.
[0006] Each of the foregoing patents describe the incorporation into heat shrinkable films
of conventional ethylene/alpha-olefins produced by Ziegler-Natta catalyst systems.
Ziegler-Natta catalytic methods are commonly used throughout the polymer industry
and have a long history tracing back to about 1957.
[0007] These systems are often referred to as heterogeneous since they are composed of many
types of catalytic species each at different metal oxidation states and different
coordination environments with ligands. Examples of Ziegler-Natta heterogeneous systems
include metal halides activated by an organometallic co-catalyst, such as titanium
or magnesium chlorides complexed to trialkyl aluminum and may be found in patents
such as U.S. Patents 4,302,565 and 4,302,566. Because these systems contain more than
one catalytic species, they possess polymerization sites with different activities
and varying abilities to incorporate comonomer into a polymer chain.
[0008] The result of such multi-site chemistry is a product with poor control of the polymer
chain architecture both within the sequence of a single chain, as well as when compared
to a neighboring chain. In addition, differences in catalyst efficiency produce high
molecular weight polymer at some sites and low molecular weight at others. Therefore,
copolymers produced using these systems lead to polymer products which are mixtures
of chains some high in comonomer and others with almost none. For example, conventional
Ziegler-Natta multi-site catalysts may yield a linear ethylene/alpha-olefin copolymer
(HDPE, LLDPE, VLDPE, ULDPE) having a mean comonomer percentage of 10, but with a range
of 0% to 40% comonomer in individual chains. This, together with the diversity of
chain lengths results in a truly heterogeneous mixture also having a broad molecular
weight distribution (MWD).
[0009] Linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) has enjoyed great success as a raw material
choice for packaging films. The term LLDPE is generally understood to describe copolymers
of ethylene and one or more other alpha olefin monomers which are polymerized at low
pressure using a Ziegler-Natta catalyst to achieve a density range of about 0.915
to about 0.940. Although no clear standard exists, LLDPE polymers are often marketed
in subgroups of densities such as linear medium density (LMDPE), linear low density
polyethylene, linear very low density (VLDPE), or linear ultra low density polyethylene
(ULDPE). These classifications are for marketing use and will vary by supplier.
[0010] These materials are different from high pressure low density polyethylene (LDPE)
which is generally understood in the trade as a highly branched homopolymer having
a single low melting point. For example, a 0.92 density LDPE would typically have
a melting point at about 112°C while a corresponding density LLDPE would have melting
points at 107°, 120°, and 125°C. The multiple melting points are commonly observed
with LLDPE and are a consequence of the above mentioned heterogeneous incorporation
of comonomer.
[0011] Recently a new type of ethylene copolymer has been introduced which is the result
of a new catalyst technology. Examples of introductory journal articles include "Exxon
Cites 'Breakthrough' in Olefins Polymerization," Modern Plastics, July 1991, p.61;
"Polyolefins Gain Higher Performance from New Catalyst Technologies," Modern Plastics,
Oct. 1991, p.46; "PW Technology Watch," Plastics World, Nov. 1991, p. 29; and " ,"
Plastics Technology, Nov. 1991, p. 15.
Such new resins are produced using metallocene catalyst systems, the uniqueness of
which resides in the steric and electronic equivalence of each catalyst position.
Metallocene catalysts are characterized as having a single, stable chemical type rather
than a volatile mixture of states as discussed for conventional Ziegler-Natta. This
results in a system composed of catalyst positions which have a singular activity
and selectivity. For this reason, metallocene catalyst systems are often referred
to as "single site" owing to the homogeneous nature of them, and polymers and copolymers
produced from them are often referred to as single site resins by their suppliers.
[0012] Generally speaking, metallocene catalysts are organometallic compounds containing
one or more cyclopentadienyl ligands attached to metals such as hafnium, titanium,
vanadium, or zirconium. A co-catalyst, such as but not limited to, oligomeric methyl
alumoxane is often used to promote the catalytic activity. By varying the metal component
and the cyclopentadienyl ligand a diversity of polymer products may be tailored having
molecular weights ranging from about 200 to greater than 1,000,000 and molecular weight
distributions from 1.5 to about 15. The choice of co-catalyst influences the efficiency
and thus the production rate, yield, and cost. Examples of metallocene catalysts are
disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,701,432, 4,306,041, 5,088,228, 4,935,397, 5,084,534,
3,161,629, 5,055,438, 5,057,475, and in JP 63/175004 and JP 1,101,315.
[0013] As a consequence of the single site system afforded by metallocenes, ethylene/alpha-olefin
copolymer resins can be produced with each polymer chain having virtually the same
architecture. Therefore, the copolymer chains produced from single site systems are
uniform not only in chain length, but also in average comonomer content, and even
regularity of comonomer spacing, or incorporation along the chain.
[0014] In contrast to the above mentioned Ziegler-Natta polymers, these single site metallocene
polymers are characterized as having a narrow MWD and narrow compositional distribution
(CD). While conventional polymers have MWD's of about 3.5 to 8.0, metallocenes range
in MWD from about 1.5 to about 2.5 and most typically about 2.0. MWD refers to the
breadth of the distribution of molecular weights of the polymer chains, and is a value
which is obtained by dividing the number-average molecular weight into the weight-average
molecular weight. The low CD, or regularity of side branches chains along a single
chain and its parity in the distribution and length of all other chains, greatly reduces
the low MW and high MW "tails". These features reduce the extractables which arise
from poor LMW control as well as improve the optics by removing the linear, ethylene-rich
portions which are present in conventional heterogeneous resins.
[0015] Thus, conventional Ziegler-Natta systems produce heterogeneous resins which reflect
the differential character of their multiple catalyst sites while metallocene systems
yield homogeneous resins which, in turn, reflect the character of their single catalytic
site.
[0016] Another distinguishing property of single site catalyzed ethylene copolymers is manifested
in their melting point range. The narrow CD of metallocenes produces a narrow melting
point range as well as a lower Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC) peak melting
point peak. Unlike conventional resins which retain a high melting point over a wide
density range, metallocene resin melting point is directly related to density. For
example, an ethylene/butene copolymer having a density of 0.905 g/cc produced using
a metallocene catalyst has a peak melting point of about 100°C, while a slightly lower
density ethylene/butene copolymer which was made using a conventional Ziegler catalyst
reflects its heterogeneous nature with a melting point at about 120°C. DSC shows that
the Ziegler resin is associated with a much wider melting point range and actually
melts higher despite its lower density.
[0017] It should be noted that at least some previously available ethylene based linear
polymers approximated the physical and compositional properties achieved by the present
metallocene catalyzed polyolefins. For example, in "Sequence and Branching Distribution
of Ethylene/1-Butene Copolymers Prepared with a Soluble Vanadium Based Ziegler-Natta
Catalyst,"
Macromolecules, 1992, 25, 2820 - 2827, it was confirmed that a soluble vanadium based Ziegler-Natta
catalytic system VOCl₃/Al₂(C₂H₅)₃Cl₃, acts essentially as a single site catalyst although
VOCl₃ is not a metallocene. Homogeneous copolymers produced by such a catalyst system
have been commercially available for several years. An example of such are the resins
sold under the tradename Tafmer(TM) by Mitsui.
[0018] U.S. Patent No. 4,501,634 to Yoshimura et al is directed to an oriented, multilayered
film which includes a Tafmer as a blend component in at least one layer.
[0019] Japanese Kokoku 37907/83 to Gunze Limited was directed to a heat-sealable biaxially
oriented composite film wherein the heat seal layer contains Tafmer in a blend.
[0020] The foregoing patents disclose homogeneous ethylene alpha-olefins having densities
below 0.90 g/cc. Heretofore, such resins have been generally unavailable in densities
at and above 0.90 g/cc because of limitations in the VOCl₃ process. Yet, U.S. Patent
1,209,825 to DuPont discloses homogeneous copolymers having densities up to about
0.920 made with single site Zigler catalysts. When extruded into a film the resins
exhibit improved physical and optical properties as compared to films of heterogeneous
copolymers. However, such homogeneous copolymers of densities above 0.90 g/cc have
been commercially unavailable. It is believed that process limitations precluded the
manufacture of such resins in any but bench-top quantities. Metallocene catalysts,
however, can provide such homogeneous copolymers in a wide range of densities in commercial
quantities. Thus, the benefits of homogeneity can now be incorporated into copolymers
having densities analogous to those of conventional VLDPEs and LLDPEs.
[0021] However, while providing improved physical properties such as optics, low extractables
and improved impact, the narrow compositional distribution of some typical metallocene
catalyzed resins can cause some processing difficulties. It has been found that such
processing problems are avoided if some limited long chain branching is introduced.
That is, a typical metallocene catalyzed ethylene alpha-olefin may be thought of as
a collection of linear chains, each of substantially identical length, each having
approximately the same number of short chain (comonomer) branches distributed at regular
intervals along that length. Splicing an abbreviated linear chain with the same regular
comonomer distribution onto each of the linear chains, or at least some of the chains
in the collection, yields an ethylene alpha-olefin with essentially all of the physical
properties of the original copolymer, but with an improved "body" or melt strength
for improved processability including improved extrudability, orientation speeds and
susceptibility to irradiation.
[0022] One way of quantifying the improved processability of the new homogeneous branched
ethylene alpha-olefin copolymers is by the melt flow ratio I₁₀/I₂ as described in
ASTM D-1238. In WO 93/08221 Dow discloses such copolymers and notes that the I₁₀/I₂
ratio for such is indicative of the degree of long chain branching. For linear polyolefins
the I₁₀/I₂ ratio increases as molecular weight distribution increases. Molecular weight
distribution may be defined as the ratio of weight average molecular weight (Mw) to
number average molecular weight (Mn) or Mw/Mn. Conventional heterogeneous linear ethylene
alpha-olefins typically have a high I₁₀/I₂ and a correspondingly high molecular weight
distribution. Linear homogeneous ethylene alpha-olefins have a low molecular weight
distribution and a correspondingly low I₁₀/I₂. But homogeneous ethylene alpha-olefins
with long chain branching such as those supplied by Dow under the Insite trade name
have low molecular weight distributions but high I₁₀/I₂ ratios. In part, Dow defines
these copolymers as having I₁₀/I₂ ≧ 5.63 and Mw/Mn ≦ (I₁₀/I₂) - 4.63. This high I₁₀/I₂
is an indication of ease of processability discussed above, while the homogeneity,
of which Mw/Mn is one measure, provides for improved physical properties also discussed
above. A more detailed description of the chemistry and particularly the rheology
of these branched homogeneous copolymers is given in WO 93/08221 which is incorporated
herein by reference.
[0023] Dow in EP 416,815 disclosed the preparation of ethylene/olefin copolymers using monocyclopentadienylsilane
complexed to a transition metal. The homogeneous ethylene copolymers which may be
prepared using this catalyst are said to have better optical properties than typical
ethylene polymers and be well suited for film or injection molding.
[0024] As will be shown below, it has been found that resins produced by the Dow process
exhibit improved physical properties characteristic of single site catalyzed resins
but also possess a processability similar to that of conventional Ziegler-Natta copolymers.
It is believed that the Dow metallocene resins possess the limited long chain branching
discussed above.
[0025] It is thus an object of the present invention to provide a film structure having
improved physical properties such as improved optics and impact strength and low extractables.
[0026] It is a further object of the present invention to provide a film which is readily
extruded and processed.
Summary of the Invention
[0027] These as well as other objects are achieved by providing a film which includes a
homogeneous single site catalyzed copolymer of ethylene and an alpha-olefin having
from three to ten carbon atoms, wherein the single site catalyzed copolymer includes
some long chain branching.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments
[0028] The present invention is directed to a heat-shrinkable, thermoplastic film or bag
containing a homogeneous copolymer of ethylene and at least one other alpha-olefin
wherein the copolymer contains at least some limited long chain branching. The term
"copolymer" as used herein is intended to denote polymers of two or more comonomers.
Therefore, although the present specification generally discusses ethylene alpha-olefin
copolymers such term is intended to encompass copolymers of ethylene with one or more
alpha-olefins or ethylene with an alpha-olefin and another comonomer.
[0029] The term "oriented" is used herein interchangeably with the term "heat shrinkable,"
these terms designating a material which has been stretched and set by cooling while
substantially retaining its stretched dimensions. An oriented (i.e. heat shrinkable)
material will tend to return to its original unstretched (unextended) dimensions when
heated to an appropriate elevated temperature.
[0030] The film of the present invention is preferably oriented and is formed by extrusion
processes especially art-known coextrusion methods. It is initially cooled to a solid
state by, for example, cascading water or chilled air quenching, after which it is
reheated to within its orientation temperature range and oriented by stretching. The
stretching to orient may be accomplished in many ways such as, for example, by "blown
bubble" techniques or "tenter framing." These processes are well known to those skilled
in the art and refer to orientation procedures whereby the material is heated to its
softening temperature and then stretched in the cross or transverse direction (TD)
and/or in the longitudinal or machine direction (MD). After being heated and stretched,
the film is quickly quenched while substantially retaining its stretched dimensions
to cool the film rapidly and thus set or lock in the oriented molecular configuration.
[0031] The film layers may be formed by coextrusion, with additional layers thereafter being
extrusion coated thereon to form multilayer films. Two multilayer tubes may also be
formed with one of the tubes thereafter being extrusion coated or laminated onto the
other. The extrusion coating method of film formation is preferable to coextruding
the entire film when it is desired to subject one or more layers of the film to a
treatment which may be harmful to one or more of the other layers. This may be done
where it is desired to irradiate one or more layers of a film with high energy electrons
where the film contains a barrier layer of one or more copolymers of vinylidene chloride
(e.g., Saran(TM)), such as vinylidene chloride and vinyl chloride or vinylidene chloride
and methyl acrylate as well as vinylidene chloride with ethyl acrylate or acrylonitrile.
[0032] Films of this type would, for example, comprise those where the barrier layer is
a Saran(TM) layer in addition to or instead of an EVOH layer. Those skilled in the
art generally recognize that irradiation with high energy electrons is generally harmful
to such Saran(TM) barrier layer compositions, as irradiation may degrade and discolor
Saran(TM), making it turn brown. Thus, if full coextrusion followed by high energy
electron irradiation of the multilayer structure is carried out on a film having a
barrier layer containing a Saran(TM) layer, the irradiation should be conducted at
low levels and with care. Alternatively, this may be avoided by extruding a first
layer or layers, subjecting the layer or layers to high energy electron irradiation
and thereafter applying the Saran(TM) barrier layer and, for that matter, other layers
(which may or may not have been irradiated) sequentially onto the outer surface of
the extruded, previously irradiated, tube. This sequence allows for high energy electron
irradiation of the first layer or layers without subjecting the Saran(TM) barrier
layer to harmful discoloration.
[0033] Thus, as used herein the term "extrusion" or the term "extruding" is intended to
include coextrusion, extrusion coating, or combinations thereof.
[0034] As noted, the present heat shrinkable film may optionally be subjected to an energetic
radiation treatment, including, but not limited to corona discharge, plasma, flame,
ultraviolet, and high energy electron treatment. Irradiation is most preferably performed
prior to orientation and, in the case of a Saran-containing barrier structure, prior
to extrusion coating of the barrier component. Radiation dosages are referred to herein
in terms of the radiation unit "RAD," with one million RADS or a megarad being designated
as "MR." A suitable radiation dosage of high energy electrons is in the range of up
to about 12 MR, more preferably about 2 to about 9 MR. However, irradiation after
orientation, regardless of structure, and performed at lower dosage levels, is also
within the scope of the present invention.
[0035] For those embodiments in which the present heat shrinkable film is a multilayer film,
each layer will generally serve some function or provide some characteristic to the
overall structure. Seal layer composition will be chosen for ease of heat sealing
and, depending on the intended end use application, other factors such as grease resistance
may be of importance. Outer layer composition may be chosen for abuse resistance or,
where a given end use application requires a folded over "lap" seal, sealability to
the seal layer. If a barrier layer is required it will be chosen for the degree of
gas or moisture impermeability needed for the ultimate product to be packaged. Further
internal layers may serve to add bulk to the film, promote shrinkability, promote
interlayer adhesion or any combination of these properties.
[0036] For purposes of the present invention it has been found that the use of homogeneous
ethylene alpha-olefin copolymers with long chain branching in at least one core layer
of a multilayer heat-shrinkable film provides improved impact properties and excellent
shrink properties. More particularly, for a gas barrier material which includes a
core layer of a polymeric material having gas barrier properties such as a vinylidene
chloride copolymer or an ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer, it has been found that
further internal layers of such homogeneous, branched ethylene alpha-olefin copolymers
sandwiching the barrier layer provide for a machinable barrier film with improved
impact resistance and free shrink. That is, it is within the scope of the present
invention to provide a multilayer heat-shrinkable film having the general structure:
seal/core/barrier/core/abuse
wherein the respective compositions of the seal, barrier and abuse layers may be chosen
from those polymeric resins or resin blends which provide the requisite functional
properties. Examples of materials appropriate for use in the seal layer include EVA,
LLDPE, VLDPE, EAA, EMAA, ionomers, homogeneous linear ethylene alpha-olefins and homogeneous
branched ethylene alpha-olefins. Examples of materials appropriate for use in the
abuse layer include EVA, LLDPE, VLDPE, homogeneous linear ethylene alpha-olefins,
homogeneous branched ethylene alpha-olefins, polypropylene, nylon, and high density
polyethylene. Examples of materials appropriate for use in the barrier layer include
vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride, vinylidene chloride methyl acrylate, ethylene
vinyl alcohol, acrilonitrile and nylon. However, other materials which have the needed
properties of sealbility and seal integrity, abuse resistance and low gas transmission
are also appropriate for use in the seal layer, abuse layer and barrier layer, respectively,
of a film in accordance with the present invention. Each of the two core layers contain
a homogeneous ethylene alpha-olefin copolymer either alone or in a blend with another
polymeric material.
[0037] For those applications in which a homogeneous branched ethylene alpha-olefin copolymer
provides adequate seal and abuse properties a film having the general structure:
seal/barrier/abuse
is also within the scope of the present invention wherein the seal and abuse layer
each contain a homogeneous branched ethylene alpha-olefin either alone or in a blend
with another polymeric material.
[0038] For those applications in which a barrier layer is not required, a film having the
general structure:
seal/core/abuse
is also within the scope of the present invention wherein the core contains a homogeneous
branched ethylene alpha-olefin either alone or in a blend. Further core layers of
branched homogeneous ethylene alpha-olefins or other polymeric materials may also
be included.
[0039] For each of the general structures set forth above it should be noted that further
internal layers may be provided to promote inner layer adhesion or add bulk as may
be necessary.
[0040] It has been found that a preferred method for producing a film in accordance with
the present invention is an extrusion coating method such as described above. By such
method a portion of the film structure is extruded, cooled and subjected to irradiation
prior to be extrusion coated with the remaining layers and subsequently oriented.
Preferably, the seal layer and a first core layer are extruded and irradiated prior
to extrusion coating of the barrier layer, second core layer and abuse layer and subsequent
orientation. Most preferably the seal layer, first core layer and a third layer chosen
to promote adhesion to the barrier layer are extruded and irradiated, followed by
extrusion coating of the barrier layer, an adhesion promoting tie layer, the second
core layer and the abuse layer and then orientation. For the present preferred method
it has been found that the use of homogeneous branched ethylene alpha-olefins in the
core layers reduces extrusion head pressure and allow for increased orientation speeds.
[0041] The following examples are representative of the preferred embodiments of the present
films containing homogeneous branched ethylene alpha-olefin copolymers. In order to
evaluate such films the following tests were employed:
Tensile Strength: A measure of the force required under constant elongation to break a specimen of
the film; measured by ASTM D 882.
Elongation: A measure of the percent extension required to break a specimen of the film; measured
by ASTM D 882.
Modulus: The ratio of the change in force to the change in elongation in the straight line
portion of an Instron Tensile Testing curve; measured by ASTM D 882 - Method A.
Tear Propagation: The force required to propagate a tear from a tiny slit made by a sharp blade in
a specimen of the film; measured by ASTM D 1938.
Free Shrink: The percent dimensional change in a 10 cm. x 10 cm. specimen of film when subjected
to a selected heat; measured by ASTM D 2732.
Ball Burst: The energy necessary to burst and penetrate a restrained specimen of film; measured
by ASTM D 3420.
Instrumented Impact: The energy necessary to puncture a restrained specimen of film, similar to ball
burst, defined above. However, the Instrumented Impact Tester has the ability to measure
the tensile/elongation curve to break. The "gradient" is the ratio of the change in
force to change in elongation in the straight line portion of the curve. "Peak" is
a measure of the maximum force exerted on the specimen to impart rupture. "Impact
Energy" is a measure of the energy absorbed by the sample prior to rupture. Instrumented
Impact is measured by ASTM D 3763.
Haze: The percentage of transmitted light which is scattered forward while passing through
a specimen; measured by ASTM D 1003 - Method A.
Clarity: A measure of the distortion of an image viewed through a specimen; measured by ASTM
D 1746.
Gloss: The surface reflectance or shine of a specimen; measured by ASTM D 2457.
Parallel Plate: A bag is confined between two plates a specified distance apart and is inflated
until its seal fails. The pressure level inside the bag at the point of failure is
a measure of seal quality. Results are reported in inches of water pressure (IOWP).
LRHB (Linear Ramped Hot Burst): A clean sealed bag is inflated to a specified dwell pressure
and the seal area is submerged in hot water at 182°F. After five seconds the pressure
inside the bag is increased at the rate of 2 inches of water/second. The time to failure
and burst pressure is a measure of seal quality. Test results are reported in seconds
and inches of water pressure (IOWP).
LRHB-G (Linear Ramped Hot Burst - Grease): The procedure is the same as the LRHB test described
above except peanut oil is first applied to the seal area.
VPHB (Variable Pressure Hot Burst): As with the LRHB test described above, a clean sealed
bag is inflated to a specified dwell pressure and the seal area is submerged in hot
water at 182 F. After five seconds the pressure inside the bag is increased at a specified
rate ranging 1 to 7 inches of water/second. Here again, test results are reported
as seconds and inches of water pressure (IOWP).
VPHB-G (Variable Pressure Hot Burst - Grease) : The procedure is the same as the VPHB test
described above except peanut oil is first applied to the seal area.
Gel: A measure of the relative amount of ultra high molecular weight polymer present
in a sample. A gel measurement can provide an indication of the level of crosslinking
which is present in a sample since the amount of polymer which is collected as gel
increases with crosslinking. Gel is determined by solvent extraction with boiling
toluene. In this method a specimen weighting 0.4 grams is extracted for 21 hours in
a cellulose thimble, removed, dried and reweighed. The percentage of gel is calculated
by ratioing the polymer remaining (toluene insoluble fraction) to the original weight.
However, a gel value of 0% cannot reliably indicate that no crosslinking has occurred.
Rather, the level of crosslinking may not be great enough to provide measurable gel.
DSC: The differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) is an instrument which measures the
heat flow to a polymer sample during the programmed heating of it at 10°C per minute.
The trace obtained from the DSC can be used to characterize a sample's starting and
ending melting point as well as its peak melting point(s).
Polydispersity (Mw/Mn): A measure of the uniformity of chain lengths within a polymer sample. It
defines the breadth of molecular weight distribution. It is obtained by dividing the
weight average molecular weight (Mw) by the number average molecular weight (Mn).
The Mw and Mn are determined by Gel Permeation Liquid Chromatography.
Example 1
[0042] A two layer coextruded precursor film having the structure inner layer/outermost
layer was formed. The inner layer was a blend of 90% by weight of NA 295-000, a 6.7%
vinyl acetate EVA supplied by Quantum, and 10% by weight of Dowlex 2045. The outermost
layer was a blend of 85% by weight of XUR-1567-48562-B9, a homogeneous ethylene octene
copolymer having a density of 0.904 g/cc and a 1.0 MI with limited long chain branching
sold on a developmental basis by DOW, and 15% by weight of EA 719-009, an ethylene
butyl-acrylate copolymer having 18.5% by weight butyl-acrylate supplied by Quantum.
Following irradiation, the precursor film was extrusion coated with a barrier layer
of a vinylidene chloride methyl acrylate from Dow and an outer abuse .pa layer of
a blend of 92.5% by weight of LD 318.92 from Exxon, a 9% vinyl acetate EVA and 7.5%
by weight of Dowlex 2045.
[0043] The resultant four layer film was then oriented by a trapped bubble method out of
hot water.
Example 2
[0044] The procedure set forth in Example 1 was repeated with the exception that the outermost
layer of the precursor film was 85% by weight of XUR-1567-48562-B9 from Dow and 15%
by weight of Nucrel 1202HC, an ethylene methacrylic acid supplied by DuPont.
Example 3
[0045] The procedure set forth in Example 1 was repeated with the exception that the outermost
layer of the precursor film was 85% by weight of XUR-1567-48562-B9 from Dow and 15%
by weight of Bynel CXA 3101, an anhydride grafted EVA having 18.4% vinyl acetate supplied
by DuPont.
Example 4
[0046] The procedure set forth in Example 1 was repeated with the exception that the outermost
layer of the precursor film was 85% by weight of XUR-1567-48562-B9 from Dow and 15%
by weight of LD 318.92 from Exxon, a 9% vinyl acetate EVA.
Example 5
[0047] For comparative purposes, the procedure set forth in Example 1 was repeated with
the exception that the outermost layer of the precursor film was 85% by weight of
Dowlex 2045 and 15% by weight of EA 719-009 an 18.5% butyl acrylate EBA.
Examples 6-10
[0048] The oriented multilayer films of Examples 1-5 were tested for instrumented impact,
free shrink and "peel", a measure of bond strength between the outermost layer of
the precursor film and the barrier layer which has been extrusion coated onto it.
The results are given below in Table I. The instrumented impact and T peel numbers
for the films of Examples 1-4 compare favorably to those of comparative Example 5.
The free shrink of the films embodying the present invention are superior to those
of the prior art structure. It should be noted that the numbers given for comparative
Example 5 are representative for a series of production runs.
Table I
Ex. # |
Film of |
Instrumented Impact |
Free Shrink L & T |
T Peel lbs/in |
|
|
Peak(lbs) |
Energy(ft) |
|
|
6 |
1 |
51.0 |
2.35 |
73 |
0.143 |
7 |
2 |
55.7 |
2.62 |
73 |
0.157 |
8 |
3 |
49.3 |
2.32 |
75 |
0.214 |
9 |
4 |
54.0 |
2.70 |
71 |
0.133 |
10 |
5 |
51.3 |
2.20 |
49.9 |
0.180 |
Example 11-19
[0049] The films of Examples 11-19 each are formed of a precursor film having an inner layer
of 90% NA 295-000, a 6.7% EVA supplied by Quantum and 10% Dowlex 2045, a core layer
and an outermost adhesive layer of EP 4062-3, a 15% vinyl acetate EVA supplied by
DuPont. Following irradiation at a selected dosage the precursor film is extrusion
coated with a barrier layer of a vinylidene chloride methyl acrylate from Dow and
an outer abuse layer of 92.5% LD 318.92 and 7.5% Dowlex 2045.
[0050] Thereafter the total structure was oriented out of hot water by a trapped bubble
technique with constant orientation preheat and hot bath temperatures of 195°F.
[0051] The core layer composition and irradiation dosage for each structure are given below
in Table II. Also shown are orientation speeds. It should be noted that for the films
of Examples 11-16, orientation speed increases with increasing irradiation dosage,
whereas such relationship is not seen for comparative Examples 17-19.
[0052] The resins employed in the core layer are XUR-1567-48562-B9, a homogeneous ethylene
octene copolymer having a density of 0.904 g/cc and a 1.0 MI with limited long chain
branching supplied by Dow represented by B9 (below), XUR-1567-48562-B4, a homogeneous
ethylene octene copolymer having a density of 0.909 g/cc and a 1.0 MI with limited
long chain branching supplied by Dow represented by B4 below, and Attane 4203, a heterogeneous
ethylene octene copolymer with a density of 0.905 g/cc supplied by Dow represented
by 4203.
[0053] The film structure and target percent thickness per layer for each film was:
Table II
Ex. # |
Core |
Dosage MR |
Orientation Speed feet/min. |
11 |
B9 |
2 |
46 |
12 |
B9 |
4 |
53 |
13 |
B9 |
6 |
53 |
14 |
B4 |
2 |
40 |
15 |
B4 |
4 |
46 |
16 |
B4 |
6 |
51 |
17 |
4203 |
2 |
46 |
18 |
4203 |
4 |
46 |
19 |
4203 |
6 |
46 |
Examples 20-28
[0054] The oriented multilayer films of Examples 11-19 were tested for instrumented impact
and free shrink. The results are given below in Table III. The films of Examples 11-16
compare favorably in all values to those of comparative Examples 17-19.
Table III
Ex. |
Film of |
Instrumented Impact |
Free Shrink L & T |
|
|
Peak(lbs) |
Energy(ft.lbs) |
|
20 |
11 |
59.6 |
3.45 |
72 |
21 |
12 |
59.9 |
3.08 |
71 |
22 |
13 |
61.5 |
3.17 |
74 |
23 |
14 |
63.0 |
3.36 |
68 |
24 |
15 |
60.4 |
2.96 |
67 |
25 |
16 |
64.6 |
3.39 |
69 |
26 |
17 |
52.8 |
2.83 |
76 |
27 |
18 |
55.3 |
2.87 |
74 |
28 |
19 |
56.7 |
3.01 |
77 |
EXAMPLE 29
[0055] A three layer coextruded precursor film having the structure: inner layer/core layer/outermost
layer was formed. The inner layer was a blend of 90% by weight of NA 295-000, a 6.7%
vinyl acetate EVA supplied by Quantum, 10% by weight of Dowlex 2045, a 0.920 density
heterogeneous linear ethylene octene copolymer from Dow. The outermost layer was EP
4062-2, a 15% vinyl acetate EVA supplied by DuPont. The core layer was XU59220.01,
lot 427833 a homogeneous ethylene octene copolymer having a density of 0.9016 g/cc
and a 0.9 MI with long chain branching sold on a developmental basis by Dow. The resin
has an I₁₀/I₂ of 10.9 and a Mw/Mn of 2.03.
[0056] Following irradiation, the precursor film is extrusion coated with a barrier layer
of a vinylidene chloride methyl acrylate from Dow blended with an epoxidized soybean
oil and an ethylene methyl acrylate, an adhesive layer of Elvax 3175GC, a 28% vinyl
acetate EVA from DuPont, a core layer of XU 59220.01, lot 427833 from Dow and an outer
abuse layer of a blend of 92.5% by weight of LD 318.92 from Exxon, a 9% vinyl acetate
EVA, and 7.5% by weight of Dowlex 2045.
[0057] The resultant seven layer film was then oriented by a trapped bubble method out of
hot water. The preheat temperature 192°F and the hot bath was 197°F. The final oriented
structure was 1.8 mil thick with the individual layers having target thicknesses as
follows:

EXAMPLE 30
[0058] The procedure set forth in Example 29 was repeated with a final oriented structure
having a thickness of 2.2 mils. The individual layers had a target thickness as follows:

EXAMPLE 31
[0059] The procedure set forth in Example 29 was repeated with a final oriented structure
having a thickness of 2.7 mils. The individual layers had a target thickness as follows:

EXAMPLE 32
[0060] The procedure set forth in Example 29 was repeated with the following exceptions.
Preheat temperature was 191°F and the hot bath was 184°. The final oriented structure
had a thickness of 3.0 mils. The individual layers had a target thickness as follows:

EXAMPLE 33
[0061] The procedure of Example 32 was repeated with the only exception being a difference
in orientation condition. The preheat temperature was 199°F and the hot bath was 195°F.
EXAMPLE 34
[0062] The procedure set forth in Example 29 was repeated with the core layers being replaced
with XU59243.00, a homogeneous ethylene octene copolymer having a density of 0.904
g/cc and a 0.8 MI with long chain branching sold on a developmental basis by Dow.
The resin has an I₁₀/I₂ of 9.2 and Mw/Mn of 2.17. For orientation, the preheat temperature
was 194°F and the hot bath was 190°F. The final oriented structure had a thickness
of 3.0 mils. The individual layers had target thicknesses as follows:

EXAMPLE 35
[0063] The procedure of Example 34 was repeated with the only exception being different
orientation conditions. The preheat temperature was 200° and the hot bath was 195°F.
EXAMPLE 36
[0064] The procedure set forth in Example 29 was repeated with the core layers being replaced
with XU 59220.00, a homogeneous ethylene octene copolymer having a density of 0.904
g/cc and a 0.9 MI with long chain branching sold on a developmental basis by Dow.
The resin has an I₁₀/I₂ of 11.3 and an Mw/Mn of 2.4. The preheat temperature was 194°F
and the hot bath was 190°F. The final oriented structure had a thickness of 3.0 mils.
The individual layers had target thicknesses as set forth in Example 32 above.
EXAMPLE 37
[0065] The procedure of Example 36 was repeated with the only exception being a difference
in orientation conditions. The preheat temperature was 200°F and the hot bath was
195°F.
EXAMPLE 38
[0066] The procedure set forth in Example 29 was repeated with the core layers being replaced
with XU 59220.01, lot 421733, a homogeneous ethylene octene copolymer having a density
of 0.9028 and a 0.9 MI with long chain branching sold on a developmental basis by
Dow. The resin has an I₁₀/I₂ of 10.5 and an Mw/Mn of 2.4. The preheat temperature
was 194°F and the hot bath was 190°F. The final oriented structure had a thickness
of 3.0 mils and individual layers as set forth in Example 32 above.
EXAMPLE 39
[0067] The procedure of Example 38 was repeated with the only exception being a difference
in orientation conditions. The preheat temperature was 200°F and the hot bath was
195°F.
EXAMPLE 40
[0068] The procedure set forth in Example 29 was repeated with the core layers being replaced
with XU 59220.02, a homogeneous ethylene octene copolymer having a density of 0.906
and a 0.8 MI with long chain branching sold on a developmental basis by Dow. The resin
has an I₁₀/I₂ of 11.8 and an Mw/Mn of 2.2. The preheat temperature was 197°F and the
hot bath was 194°F. The final oriented structure and individual layers had its thickness
of 3.0 mils and individual layer as set forth in Example 32 above.
EXAMPLE 41
[0069] The procedure of Example 40 was repeated with the only exception being a difference
in orientation condition. Preheat temperature was 200°F and the hot bath was 195°F.
EXAMPLE 42
[0070] The procedure set forth in Example 29 was repeated with the core layers being replaced
with XU 59220.03, a homogeneous ethylene octene copolymer having a density of 0.898
and a 0.9 MI with long chain branching sold on a developmental basis by Dow. The resin
has an I₁₀/I₂ of 10.5 and an Mw/Mn of 2.0. The preheat temperature was 187°F and the
hot bath was 181°F. The final structure and individual layers had thicknesses as set
forth above in Example 32.
EXAMPLE 43
[0071] The procedure of Example 42 with the only exception being a difference in orientation
condition. The preheat temperature was 200°F and the hot bath was 195°F.
EXAMPLE 44
[0072] The procedure set forth in Example 29 was repeated with the core layers being replaced
with XU 59220.04, a homogeneous ethylene octene copolymer having a density of .896
and a 0.9 MI with long chain branching sold on a developmental basis by Dow. The resin
has an I₁₀/I₂ of 10.5 and an Mw/Mn of 2.17. The preheat temperature was 188°F and
the hot bath was 182°F. The final oriented structure and individual layers had thicknesses
as set forth in Example 32 above.
EXAMPLE 45
[0073] The procedure of Example 44 was repeated with the only exception being a difference
in orientation condition. The preheat temperature 200°F and the hot bath was 195°F.
EXAMPLE 46
[0074] The procedure set forth in Example 29 was repeated with the core layers being replaced
with Insite C24, a homogeneous branched ethylene octene copolymer having a density
of 0.904 g/cc and a 0.9 MI sold on a developmental basis by Dow. The resin has an
I₁₀/I₂ of 9.2 and an Mw/Mn of 2.0. The preheat temperature was 200 F and the hot bath
was 195 F. The final structure was 3.0 mils and individual layers had target thicknesses
as set forth in Example 32 above.
EXAMPLE 47
[0075] For comparative purposes, the procedure set forth in Example 29 was repeated with
the core layers being replaced with Attane 4203, a heterogeneous octene copolymer
from Dow having a density of 0.905 g/cc and a 0.8 MI. The resin has an I₁₀/I₂ of 8.2
and an Mw/Mn of 3.8. The preheat temperature was 194°F and the hot bath was 190°F.
The final oriented structure had a thickness of 3.0 mils and individual layers had
target thicknesses as set forth above in Example 32.
EXAMPLE 48
[0076] For comparative purposes, the procedure of Example 47 was repeated with the only
exception being a difference in orientation condition. The preheat temperature was
200°F and hot bath was 195°F.
EXAMPLES 49 - 68
[0077] To evaluate their physical properties, the oriented multilayer films of Examples
29-48 were tested for instrumented impact and free shrink. Examples 34 and 35 are
based on core layers of XU 59243.00, a homogeneous branched ethylene octene from Dow
which has a density of 0.904 g/cc and a 0.8 MI, a density and melt index essentially
the same as that for Attane 4203, the heterogeneous linear ethylene octene copolymer
employed in Comparative Examples 47 and 48. However, the film structures of Examples
34 and 35 show greatly improved peak load and energy to break as compared to the films
of Examples 47 and 48, respectively. The results are given in Table IV below.
Table IV
EX.# L&T |
FILM OF |
PEAK LOAD (lbs) |
ENERGY TO BREAK (ft. lbs) |
FREE SHRINK |
49 |
29 |
49 |
2.3 |
83 |
50 |
30 |
53 |
2.9 |
80 |
51 |
31 |
64 |
4.2 |
81 |
52 |
32 |
83 |
6.2 |
86 |
53 |
33 |
68 |
4.9 |
76 |
54 |
34 |
98 |
9.3 |
75 |
55 |
35 |
90 |
8.0 |
67 |
56 |
36 |
84 |
7.4 |
76 |
57 |
37 |
73 |
5.4 |
70 |
58 |
38 |
70 |
5.1 |
77 |
59 |
39 |
74 |
6.0 |
73 |
60 |
40 |
81 |
5.4 |
68 |
61 |
41 |
82 |
6.0 |
66 |
62 |
42 |
77 |
6.5 |
96 |
63 |
43 |
58 |
5.0 |
78 |
64 |
44 |
75 |
6.3 |
96 |
65 |
45 |
56 |
4.9 |
80 |
66 |
46 |
81 |
10.6 |
77 |
67 |
47 |
78 |
5.1 |
79 |
68 |
48 |
75 |
5.6 |
74 |
EXAMPLES 69-88
[0078] To evaluate the processability of the homogeneous branched ethylene octene copolymers
found in each of the above film structures, the orientation speed was noted for each
structure at each orientation temperature. Surprisingly, the film structures containing
the homogeneous branched ethylene octene copolymers from Dow which showed improved
toughness in Examples 49 - 66 above generally oriented faster than the films of Comparative
Examples 47 and 48. The results are given in Table V below.
Table V
EX.# |
FILM OF |
PREHEAT (°F) |
HOT BATH (°F) |
ORIENTATION SPEED (ft/min) |
69 |
29 |
192 |
197 |
51 |
70 |
30 |
192 |
197 |
53 |
71 |
31 |
192 |
197 |
50 |
72 |
32 |
191 |
184 |
32 |
73 |
33 |
199 |
195 |
45 |
74 |
34 |
194 |
190 |
33 |
75 |
35 |
200 |
195 |
40 |
76 |
36 |
194 |
190 |
30 |
77 |
37 |
200 |
195 |
37 |
78 |
38 |
194 |
190 |
33 |
79 |
39 |
200 |
195 |
40 |
80 |
40 |
197 |
194 |
32 |
81 |
41 |
200 |
195 |
35 |
82 |
42 |
187 |
181 |
40 |
83 |
43 |
200 |
195 |
51 |
84 |
44 |
188 |
182 |
36 |
85 |
45 |
200 |
195 |
46 |
86 |
46 |
200 |
195 |
53 |
87 |
47 |
194 |
190 |
32 |
88 |
48 |
200 |
195 |
36 |
EXAMPLES 89-90
[0079] To evaluate the processability of the homogeneous long chain branched ethylene octene
copolymers incorporated into the present film structures, the head pressures were
noted during extrusion of both the substrate and the coating of the films of Example
34 and Comparative Example 47. Examples 29-33 and 36-45 are not included in Table
VI below because valid comparisons can only be made between resins of the same melt
index. Example 46 is not included because it was not made under comparable extrusion
conditions. It should be noted that although the films of Examples 35 and 48 contain
the same polymeric materials as those of Examples 34 and 47, evaluated below, they
are not included because they result from the same extrusion runs. That is, Example
35 is the orientation of the unoriented tape structure described in Example 34 under
differing orientation conditions from those described in Example 34. The same can
be said for Example 48 with respect to Example 47. The homogeneous branched ethylene
octene copolymer employed in Example 34 provided lower extrusion head pressures than
the heterogeneous linear ethylene octene copolymer of Example 47.
Table VI
EX.# |
FILM OF |
HEAD PRESSURE OF 1ST EXTRUDER (psi) |
HEAD PRESSURE OF 2ND EXTRUDER(psi) |
89 |
34 |
5230 |
5750 |
90 |
47 |
5600 |
6267 |
EXAMPLE 91
[0080] The procedure set forth in Example 29 was repeated with the two core layers being
replaced with a blend of 80% by weight of XU59243.00, a homogeneous ethylene octene
copolymer having a density of 0.904 g/cc and a 0.8 MI with long chain branching sold
on a developmental basis by Dow, and 20% by weight of LD-318.92,a 9% VA ethylene vinyl
acetate sold by Exxon. The XU59243.00 resin has an I₁₀/I₂ of 9.2 and a Mw/Mn of 2.17
[0081] The final oriented structure had a thickness of 3.0 mils. The individual layers had
a target thickness as follows:

EXAMPLE 92
[0082] The procedure set forth in Example 29 was repeated with the two core layers being
replaced with a blend of 90% by weight of XU 59243.00 and 10% by weight of LD-318.92
from Exxon.
[0083] The final oriented structure had a thickness of 3.0 mils. The individual layers had
a target thickness as follows:

EXAMPLE 93
[0084] The procedure set forth in Example 29 was repeated with the two core layers being
replaced with a blend of 80% by weight of XU59243.00 and 20% by weight of Elvax 3175GC,
a 28% VA ethylene vinyl acetate sold by DuPont
The final oriented structure had a thickness of 3.0 mils. The individual layers
had a target thickness as follows:

EXAMPLE 94
[0085] The procedure set forth in Example 29 was repeated with the two core layers being
replaced with a blend of 90% by weight of XU59243.00 and 10% by weight of Elvax 3175GC
from DuPont.
[0086] The final oriented structure had a thickness of 3.0 mils. The individual layers had
a target thickness as follows:

EXAMPLE 95
[0087] The procedure set forth in Example 29 was repeated with the two core layers being
replaced with a blend of 85% by weight of XU59243.00 and 15% by weight of Escorene
LD-720.92, a 19% VA ethylene vinyl acetate sold by Exxon.
[0088] The final oriented structure had a thickness of 3.0 mils. The individual layers had
a target thickness as follows:

EXAMPLE 96-100
[0089] The oriented multilayer films of Examples 91-95 were tested for instrumented impact
and free shrink. The results are given below in Table VII.
Table VII
EX.# |
FILM OF |
INSTRUMENTED IMPACT |
FREE SHRINK L&T |
|
|
PEAK LOAD (lbs) |
ENERGY TO BREAK (ft.lbs.) |
|
96 |
91 |
84 |
5.6 |
74 |
97 |
92 |
86 |
5.8 |
76 |
98 |
93 |
84 |
5.0 |
82 |
99 |
94 |
96 |
6.2 |
80 |
100 |
95 |
85 |
5.1 |
80 |
[0090] The foregoing description of preferred embodiments of the invention have been presented
for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive
or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and modifications and variations
are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of the
invention. The embodiment were chosen and described in order to explain the principles
of the invention and its practical application to enable one skilled in the art to
utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are
suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention
be defined by the claims appended hereto, and their equivalents.
1. A film suitable for packaging comprising a homogeneous single site catalyzed copolymer
of ethylene and an alpha-olefin having from three to ten carbon atoms, said single
site catalyzed copolymer having limited long chain branching.
2. A film as set forth in claim 1 wherein said film is heat-shrinkable.
3. A heat shrinkable film as set forth in claim 1, wherein said alpha-olefin has from
four to eight carbon atoms.
4. A film as set forth in claim 1 wherein said single site catalyzed copolymer is blended
with another thermoplastic homopolymer or copolymer.
5. A film as set forth in claim 1 wherein said single site catalyzed copolymer has a
density of from about 0.86 g/cc to about 0.95 g/cc.
6. A film as set forth in claim 1 wherein said film is a multilayer film.
7. A heat shrinkable multilayer film comprising at least one inner core layer comprising
a homogeneous single site catalyzed copolymer of ethylene and an alpha-olefin having
from four to ten carbon atoms and having at least some long chain branching said copolymer
having a density of from about 0.89 g/cc to about 0.91 g/cc.
8. The heat shrinkable film of claim 7 wherein said alpha-olefin having from four to
ten carbon atoms is octene.
9. The heat shrinkable film of claim 7 wherein said homogeneous branched copolymer is
blended with another thermoplastic homopolymer or copolymer.
10. The heat shrinkable film of claim 9 wherein said other thermoplastic homopolymer or
copolymer is a copolymer of ethylene and a second comonomer selected from the group
consisting of vinyl acetate, alkyl acrylate, carbon monoxide, butadiene, styrene,
acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, a metal neutralized salt of an acrylic acid, and an
alpha-olefin.
11. A heat shrinkable multilayer film comprising at least two core layers, each of said
core layers comprising a homogeneous single site catalyzed copolymer of ethylene and
an alpha-olefin having from four to ten carbon atoms and having at least some long
chain branching said copolymer having a density of from about 0.89 to about 0.91.
12. The heat shrinkable film set forth in claim 11 wherein the homogeneous branched copolymer
of one of said two core layers is identical to the homogeneous branched copolymer
of the other of said layers.
13. The heat shrinkable film set forth in claim 11 wherein the alpha-olefin having from
four to ten carbon atoms is octene.
14. The heat shrinkable film of claim 11 wherein said homogeneous branched copolymer is
blended with another thermoplastic homopolymer or copolymer.
15. The heat shrinkable film of claim 11 wherein said other thermoplastic homopolymer
or copolymer is a copolymer of ethylene and a second comonomer selected from the group
consisting of vinyl acetate, alkyl acrylate, carbon monoxide, butadiene, styrene,
acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, a metal neutralized salt of an acrylic acid, and an
alpha-olefin.
16. The heat shrinkable film of claim 11 wherein the homogeneous branched copolymer has
a density of from about 0.90 g/cc to about 0.91 g/cc.
17. A heat shrinkable multilayer film having the general structure:
seal/core/barrier/core/abuse
wherein each of the core layers comprise the same homogeneous long chain branched
single-site catalyzed copolymer of ethylene and an alpha-olefin having from four to
ten carbon atoms, said copolymer having a density of from about 0.89 g/cc to about
0.91 g/cc.
18. The heat shrinkable film of claim 17 wherein said alpha-olefin having from four to
ten carbon atoms is octene.
19. The heat shrinkable film of claim 17 wherein said homogeneous branched copolymer is
blended with another thermoplastic homopolymer or copolymer.
20. The heat shrinkable film of claim 19 wherein said other thermoplastic homopolymer
or copolymer is a copolymer of ethylene and a second comonomer selected from the group
consisting of vinyl acetate, alkyl acrylate, carbon monoxide, butadiene, styrene,
acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, a metal neutralized salt of an acrylic acid, and an
alpha-olefin.
21. The heat shrinkable film of claim 17 wherein the homogeneous branched copolymer has
a density of from about 0.90 g/cc to about 0.91 g/cc.
22. The heat shrinkable film of claim 17 wherein the barrier layer comprises a vinylidene
chloride copolymer.
23. The heat shrinkable film of claim 22 wherein the barrier layer comprises a vinylidene
chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer.
24. The heat shrinkable film of claim 17 wherein the seal layer comprises a copolymer
of ethylene and a comonomer selected from the group consisting of vinyl acetate, alkyl
acrylate, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, a metal neutralized salt of an acrylic acid,
and an alpha olefin.
25. The heat shrinkable film set forth in claim 17 further including additional internal
layers to promote interlayer adhesion.
26. A heat shrinkable multilayer film comprising:
a) a seal layer;
b) a first core layer comprising a homogeneous, long chain branched ethylene alpha-olefin
copolymer having a density of from about 0.89 g/cc to about 0.91 g/cc;
c) a barrier layer;
d) a second core layer comprising a homogeneous, long chain branched ethylene alpha-olefin
copolymer having a density of from about 0.89 g/cc to about 0.91 g/cc; and
e) an abuse layer;
wherein the homogeneous, branched ethylene alpha-olefin of the first core layer differs
from that of the second core layer.
27. The heat shrinkable film claim 26 further including additional internal layers to
promote interlayer adhesion.
28. A multilayer heat shrinkable film comprising:
a) a sealing layer comprising a homogeneous, single site catalyzed copolymer of ethylene
and a alpha-olefin with four to ten carbon atoms, said copolymer having long chain
branching and a density of from about 0.89 g/cc to about 0.91 g/cc;
b) a barrier layer; and
c) an abuse layer comprising a homogeneous single site catalyzed copolymer of ethylene
and a alpha-olefin with four to ten carbon atoms, said copolymer having long chain
branching and a density of from about 0.89 g/cc to about 0.91 g/cc.
29. A heat shrinkable multi-layer film having the general structure:
seal/core/barrier/core/abuse
when each of the two core layers comprise the same homogenous copolymer of ethylene
and octene having an I₁₀/I₂ greater than or equal to 5.63 and an Mn/Mn less than or
equal to (I₁₀/I₂) - 4.63, said copolymer having a density of from about 0.89 g/cc
to about 0.91 g/cc.
30. The heat shrinkable film of claim 29 wherein at least one of said core layers further
includes another thermoplastic homopolymer or copolymer blended with the homogenous
ethylene octene polymer.
31. The heat shrinkable film of claim 30 wherein said other thermoplastic homopolymer
or copolymer is a copolymer of ethylene and a second comonomer selected from the group
consisting of vinyl acetate, alkyl acrylate, carbon monoxide, butadiene, styrene,
acrylic acid, methylacyrlic acid, a metal neutralized salt of an acrylic acid and
an alpha olefin.
32. The heat shrinkable film of claim 31 further including additional internal layers
to promote interlayer adhesion.
33. The heat shrinkable multilayer film comprising:
a) a sealing layer;
b) a first core layer comprising a homogeneous ethylene octene copolymer having an
I₁₀/I₂ greater than or equal to 5.63 and an Mw/Mn less than or equal to (I₁₀/I₂) -
4.63 and having a density of from about 0.89 g/cc to about 0.91 g/cc;
c) a barrier layer;
d) a second core layer comprising a homogenous ethylene octene copolymer having an
I₁₀/I₂ greater than or equal to 5.63 and an Mw/Mn less than or equal to (I₁₀/I₂) -
4.63 and having a density of from about 0.89 g/cc to about 0.91 g/cc;
e) an abuse layer.
34. A heat shrinkable multilayer film as set forth in claim 33 wherein the homogenous
ethylene octene copolymer of said first core layer differs from that of said second
core layer.
35. The heat shrinkable film set forth in claim 33 further including additional internal
layers to promote interlayer adhesion.
36. The heat shrinkable film set forth in claim 33 wherein the homogenous ethylene octene
copolymer of at least one of said first and second core layers is blended with another
thermoplastic homopolymer or copolymer.
37. The heat shrinkable film set forth in claim 36 wherein said other thermoplastic homopolymer
or copolymer is a copolymer of ethylene and a second comonomer selected from the group
consisting of vinyl acetate, alkyl acrylate, carbon monoxide, butadiene, styrene,
acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, a metal neutralized salt of an acrylic acid and an
alpha olefin.
38. A heat shrinkable multilayer film having the general structure:
seal/core/abuse
wherein the core layer comprises a homogeneous long chain branched single site catalyzed
copolymer of ethylene and an alpha-olefin having from four to ten carbon atoms, said
copolymer having a density of from about 0.89 g/cc to about 0.91 g/cc.
39. The heat shrinkable film of claim 38 further including a second core layer, said core
layer comprising a homogeneous long chain branched single site catalyzed copolymer
of ethylene and an alpha-olefin having from four to ten carbon atoms, said copolymer
having a density of from about 0.89 g/cc to about 0.91 g/cc.