FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to a method of finely polishing planar optical elements
used in conjunction with optical waveguides.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Remote information is commonly transmitted by passing light waves through an optical
waveguide, for example, an optical fiber. One type of optical waveguide device of
current interest is a planar optical waveguide component. Such optical waveguide devices
include a guide or core layer sandwiched between two cladding layers of media with
lower indices of refraction than that of the guide layer. Increasingly, such optical
waveguide devices include an integral planar optical element in the optical path of
the waveguide. Such elements include lenses, gratings, and microprisms.
[0003] Where manufacturing integral optical elements, a technique of reactive ionic etching
is sometimes used, see e.g. U.S. Patent No. 4,865,453 and U.S. Patent No. 4,740,951.
[0004] One problem encountered with reactive ionic etching is the formation of rough cavity
surfaces. As a result, the integral optical elements formed in such cavities tend
to have rough surfaces. Due to the small and isolated nature of such cavities, it
is difficult to eliminate such roughness. These defects cause light scattering or
loss which reduces the performance of the planar optical element. Such performance
is generally expressed in terms of excess loss -- i.e. the amount of light loss above
the loss in each optical channel due to optical circuitry splitting.
[0005] In M.M. Minot, et al., "A New Guided-Wave Lens Structure,"
Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 8, no. 12 (1990) a cavity is formed in the host waveguide by reactive ionic
etching. The walls of the resulting cavities are then made smoother by a wet chemical
polishing etch. A lens-shaped waveguide is then formed in the cavity by evaporative
deposition of SiO₂ in the bottom of the cavity as a cladding layer. Glass, which acts
as a guiding layer, is then diode sputter deposited in the cavity.
[0006] This technique is not commercially useful, because long treatment periods must be
utilized. The present invention is directed to overcoming the surface roughness problem
encountered in integral optical elements in a more efficient and cost effective fashion.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0007] The present invention is directed to a method of finely polishing an optically transparent
surface with a polishing liquid containing abrasive particles. The polishing liquid,
while subjected to agitation, is contacted with an optically transparent surface under
conditions effective to polish finely the optically transparent surface. Such agitation
is desirably ultrasonic with the abrasive particles preferably having a size of up
to 1 micron. The process is particularly useful where the optically transparent surface
defines a cavity configured to define a planar optical element.
[0008] The procedure of the present invention substantially reduces the roughness of optically
transparent cavity surfaces. When a planar optical element is subsequently formed
in the cavity, the smoothness of the cavity surfaces causes the conforming surfaces
of the planar optical element to be smooth. This substantially reduces the excess
loss in the waveguide.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0009] FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an ultrasonic polishing apparatus in accordance with
the present invention.
[0010] FIG. 2 is a photograph taken with a scanning electron microscope of a cavity in an
optical waveguide which has not been subjected to ultrasonic polishing.
[0011] FIG. 3 is a photograph taken with a scanning electron microscope of a cavity in an
optical waveguide which has been subjected to one hour of ultrasonic polishing in
accordance with the present invention.
[0012] FIG. 4 is a photograph taken with a scanning electron microscope of a cavity in an
optical waveguide which has been subjected to 2 hours of ultrasonic polishing in accordance
with the present invention.
[0013] FIG. 5 is a photograph taken with a scanning electron microscope of a cavity in an
optical waveguide which has been subjected to ultrasonic polishing for 4 hours in
accordance with the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION AND DRAWINGS
[0014] The present invention relates to a method of finely polishing an optically transparent
surface with a polishing mixture containing abrasive particles. The polishing mixture,
while subjected to ultrasonic agitation, is contacted with an optically transparent
surface under conditions effective to polish finely the optically transparent surface.
This contact preferably involves immersing the surface in the polishing mixture.
[0015] FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an apparatus for ultrasonic polishing in accordance
with the present invention. In this device, generator 10, which produces electrical
output pulses, comprises a device for rapidly switching high-voltage DC on and off
to produce pulses. Several known devices can accomplish such switching, and they include
blocking oscillators, multivibrators, flip-flops, tunnel diodes, and others.
[0016] Pulses from generator 10 are supplied to transducer 8 which moves mechanically in
response to the pulses. Several generally known devices can be made pulse-responsive
to serve as transducer 8, and these include crystals, piezo-electrics, electrostrictive,
magnetostrictive devices, and others.
[0017] Generator 10 is designed to operate in the ultrasonic frequency range of 20-45 kilohertz
at an agitation power level of 150 to 200 watts. Transducer 8 is caused to operate
under these conditions as a result of its being coupled to generator 10. In turn,
transducer 8 is attached to the base or a side of tank 6 to vibrate liquid L under
these conditions. Transducer 8, generator 10, and tank 6 are preferably together embodied
in a conventional ultrasonic cleaning unit. One example of such a unit is the Branson
D-150 Ultrasonic cleaner manufactured by Branson Equipment Co., Shelton, CT.
[0018] Planar optical device D is placed in container 2 for fine polishing in accordance
with the present invention. A weighted cover 4 is then placed over container 2 to
keep it in contact with the bottom of tank 6. Also held within container 2 is polishing
mixture P which is subjected to ultrasonic conditions as the high intensity positive
displacements produced in liquid L are transmitted through the wall of container 2.
In turn, such displacements of polishing mixture P impinge planar optical device D.
During operation of the apparatus of FIG. 1, the level of liquid L should be maintained
at a height sufficient to ensure transmission of such positive displacements. Generally,
a depth of 2.0 to 2.6 centimeters, preferably 2.54 centimeters, of liquid in tank
6 is sufficient.
[0019] Instead of utilizing the arrangement of FIG. 1, the ultrasonic polishing process
of the present invention can employ a workholder or clamp to immerse planar optical
device D in polishing mixture P of container 2. This technique is disclosed in U.S.
Patent Nos. 2,796,702 and 3,564,775 to Bodine, Jr. which are hereby incorporated by
reference.
[0020] In another alternative embodiment of the present invention, the process can be carried
out without utilizing container 2 and cover 4. Polishing mixture P and planar optical
device D can be placed directly in tank 6 for fine polishing.
[0021] Polishing mixture P is prepared from a mixture of a liquid and abrasive particles.
The polishing mixture has a volumetric ratio of liquid to abrasive particles of 1:0.4
to 1:2.5, preferably 1:1.
[0022] Polishing can be carried out at any temperature which is not detrimental to the optically
transparent surface being polished. Temperatures of not more than 20 to 50°C should
be used with room temperature being preferred. If need be, ice can be added to liquid
L to ensure that it is not overheated by transducer 8.
[0023] Generally, the longer polishing is carried out, the smoother the optically transparent
surfaces become. Polishing times of about 1 to 4 hours are usually satisfactory.
[0024] The abrasive particles preferably have a size of up to 1 micron, more preferably
.1 to .3 microns. These particles are made from aluminum oxide, glass, diamond dust,
carborundum, tungsten carbide, silicon carbide, boron carbide, and mixtures thereof.
Preferably, aluminum oxide powder with a .3 micron particle size is utilized.
[0025] The liquid component of polishing mixture P can be any liquid suitable for slurrying
the above abrasive particles. Such liquids include tap water and deionized water.
[0026] The fine polishing method of the present invention is useful in treating optically
transparent surfaces which define a cavity or sidewall in an optical waveguide. Such
cavities or sidewalls are formed by subjecting optical waveguides to reactive ionic
etching and have a configuration corresponding to that of a planar optical element.
After the cavity or sidewall is formed, it is finely polished in accordance with the
present invention. A planar optical element is then formed in the polished cavity
in accordance with the procedure of U.S. Patent Nos. 4,868,453 to Gidon, et al. and
4,740,951 to Lizet, et al. and M.M. Minot, "A New Guided-Wave Lens Structure,"
Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 8, no. 12 (1990), all of which are discussed above. Suitable planar optical
element configurations are those of a geodesic component, a Luneberg lens, a Fresnel
lens, a grating lens, a TIPE lens, and other similar microcomponent devices.
[0027] Several techniques are known for producing such planar optical elements in planar
integrated optical devices. The following references disclose suitable procedures:
U.S. Patent No. 4,712,856 to Nicia for geodesic components; Suhara, et al., "Graded-Index
Fresnel Lenses for Integrated Optics,"
Applied Optics, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1966-71 (1982) for Fresnel lenses; Columbini, "Design of Thin-film
Luneberg-type Lenses for Maximum Focal Length Control,"
Applied Optics, vol. 20, no. 20, pp. 3589-93 (1981) for Luneberg lenses; and Hatakoshi et al., "Waveguide
Grating Lenses for Optical Couplers,"
Applied Optics, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1749-53 (1984) for grating lenses. Another technique has been
developed where planar optical waveguides and components therein are fabricated using
polymers, e.g., Fan, et al., EPO Patent Publication No. 0,446,672.
[0028] Geodesic lenses are characterized by a surface indentation in the top of the planar
optical waveguide. Geodesic lenses require tight control during the manufacture of
this surface indentation in order to keep scattering losses at transition points to
a minimum.
[0029] Luneberg lenses, which are a subclass of geodesic lenses, require the use of a lens
material which has a higher index of refraction than the planar optical waveguide
substrate with which it is used.
[0030] Fresnel lenses, which are similar to zone plates in bulk optics, rely on phase shifting
and/or absorption to obtain the desired focusing effect. This phase shifting is achieved
through a series of half-period zones which are applied to a planar optical waveguide.
For a more detailed discussion of the use of Fresnel lenses in planar optical waveguides,
see Ashley et al., "Fresnel Lens in a Thin-film Waveguide",
Applied Physics Letters, vol. 33, pages 490-92 (1978).
[0031] Other techniques for producing planar optical elements in optical waveguides are
disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 840,749 to Bhagavatula, which is hereby
incorporated by reference.
[0032] Optically transparent surfaces treated in accordance with the present invention generally
have a surface roughness which is substantially smoother than that encountered after
reactive ionic etching. When surfaces of an optical waveguide cavity are finely polished
in this fashion before formation of a planar optical element in the cavity, the waveguide
has substantially less excess loss than waveguides which have not been polished in
this fashion. Thus, optical waveguides treated in accordance with the present invention
exhibit substantially better performance than those not subjected to polishing.
EXAMPLES
Example 1
[0033] An optical waveguide with a cavity formed by reactive ionic etching was subjected
to a buffered oxide etch with a modified HF buffered solution for 30 seconds at an
etch rate of 400 Angstroms per minute. After completion of the buffered oxide etch
treatment, a photograph of the optical waveguide was taken with a scanning electron
microscope. See Figure 2. This photograph shows that the cavity surfaces have significant
roughness.
Example 2
[0034] An optical waveguide with a cavity like that of Example 1 was subjected to a buffered
oxide etch according to the procedures set forth in Example 1.
[0035] The waveguide was then placed in a 30 milliliter beaker to which has been added a
polishing mixture formulated from 10 milliliters of 0.3 micron alumina powder and
10 milliliters of water. The beaker was then placed in the tank of a Branson D-150
ultrasonic cleaner and a weighted plastic cover was put on top of the beaker to ensure
that it remained in good contact with the base of the ultrasonic cleaner. The ultrasonic
cleaner tank was then filled to a height of 2.54 centimeters of water so that ultrasonic
vibrations were transmitted to the beaker contents. The ultrasonic cleaner was then
turned on and operated for a period of 1 hour.
[0036] After completion of the ultrasonic treatment, the optical waveguide was removed and
a photograph of it was taken with a scanning electron microscope. This photograph
is FIG. 3. A comparison of FIGS. 2 and 3 show that the fine polishing procedure of
the present invention produces a substantially smoother cavity.
Example 3
[0037] The test procedure of Example 2 was repeated except that the ultrasonic polishing
stage was carried out for 2 hours. After completion of ultrasonic polishing, the optical
waveguide was removed from the polishing mixture and a photograph of it was taken
with a scanning electron microscope. This photograph is FIG. 4. A comparison of FIG.
4 with FIGS. 2 and 3 shows that increasing the ultrasonic polishing time enhances
the smoothness of the cavity walls.
Example 4
[0038] The process of Example 2 was repeated except that the ultrasonic polishing time was
4 hours. After completion of ultrasonic polishing, the optical waveguide was removed
from the polishing mixture and a photograph of it was taken with a scanning electron
microscope. This photograph is FIG. 5. A comparison of FIG. 5 with FIGS. 2, 3, and
4 indicates that the 4 hour polishing time achieved increased smoothness of the cavity
walls.
Example 5
[0039] 1x8 coupler/splitter devices were made according to the design and process set forth
in copending U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 07/840,749, which is incorporated
herein by reference. One such device was measured after processing according to Example
1 for optical performance. The mean ratio between the input power and the output power
for the 8 outputs was approximately 12 dB (theoretical ratio is 9 dB for 1x8 splitting).
[0040] Another such device was additionally treated according to the polishing process of
Example 4. The mean excess loss was about 11 dB, an improvement of 33% from the excess
loss without the inventive polishing treatment.
1. A method of finely polishing an optically transparent surface which defines a cavity
or wall in an optical element contained in a small, planar optical device, said method
comprising:
providing a polishing mixture in the form of a liquid slurry containing small abrasive
particles and
contacting the polishing mixture, while subjected to agitation, with an optically
transparent surface which defines a cavity or wall in an optical waveguide contained
in a small, planar optical device under conditions effective to polish finely the
optically transparent surface.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein said contacting involves immersing the optically
transparent surface in the polishing mixture.
3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the polishing mixture is in a container, wherein
the container is maintained in a liquid bath which is subjected to ultrasonic agitation.
4. A method according to claim 1, wherein the agitation is carried out under ultrasonically
at a frequency of 20 to 45 kilohertz, or a power level of 150 to 200 watts, or both.
5. A method according to claim 1, wherein the abrasive particles are made from aluminum
oxide, glass, diamond dust, carborundum, tungsten carbide, silicon carbide, boron
carbide, and mixtures thereof.
6. A method according to claim 1, wherein the polishing mixture has a volumetric ratio
of liquid to abrasive particles of 1:0.4 to 1:2.5.
7. A method according to claim 1, wherein the optically transparent surface is configured
to define a planar optical element, a geodesic component, a Luneberg lens, a Fresnel
lens, a grating lens, a TIPE lens, or other similar microcomponent devices.
8. A method according to claim 9, wherein the optically transparent surface defines a
cavity or sidewall in an optical waveguide.
9. A method according to claim 1, wherein the abrasive particles have a size of up to
1 micron, preferrably a size range of .1 to .3 microns.
10. A method of finely polishing an optically transparent surface which defines a cavity
or wall in an optical waveguide contained in a small planar optical device, said method
comprising:
providing a polishing mixture, while subjected to ultrasonic agitation, with an
optically transparent surface which defines a cavity or wall in an optical waveguide
contained in a small planar optical device under conditions effective to polish finely
the optically transparent surface.