BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] This invention relates to liquid detergent compositions suitable for cleaning hard
surfaces and which impart insect repelling properties. More particularly, this invention
relates to liquid all purpose detergent compositions containing an insect repellent
material, and to a process for cleaning and repelling insects from surfaces and articles
to which such detergent compositions are applied.
[0002] Many types of insects common in households, such as German (Blattela germanica) or
house cockroaches, are classified as pests, and much effort has been made to eradicate
or at least to control them. Mosquito repellents have long been marketed and various
chemicals that are effective in repelling roaches have been discovered. Typically,
these chemicals and repellents are used in the household by applying or spraying them
to surfaces of walls, floors, cabinets, drawers, packages, containers, rugs, upholstery
and carpeting, and in potential nesting places for insects, such as inside walls and
between floors. However, heretofore insect repellents have not been generally used
in conjunction with hard surface cleaners so as to effectively clean a hard household
surface, such as a kitchen wall, oven top, bathroom floor or the like, while at the
same time applying a film of insect repellent material which is sufficiently substantive
to the surface to which the composition is applied to repel insects therefrom.
[0003] The incorporation of an insect repellent into a polishing product for household floors
is known in the art. U.S. Patent 3,018,217 to Bruce discloses floor wax coating compositions
containing dibutyl succinate as an insect repellent. U.S. Patent 3,034,950 to Goodhue
et al, discloses a class of insect repellent compounds which may be applied to surfaces
dispersed in a wax. In U.S. 4,455,308 to Smolanoff, there are described insect repellent
formulations containing a liquid carrier such as liquid aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbons.
An emulsifying agent such as a nonionic surfactant may be added to the liquid hydrocarbon
to permit the composition to be dispersed in water for end use application. U.S. Patent
4,822,614 to Rodero, discloses an insect-repellent ingredient in a hydrocarbon-based
solvent such as isoparaffinic hydrocarbons.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0004] The present invention provides an aqueous liquid detergent composition capable of
cleaning a hard surface and repelling insects therefrom comprising (i) a detersive
proportion of a surface active detergent compound selected from the group consisting
of anionic, nonionic, cationic and amphoteric detergent compounds; (ii) at least about
50%, by weight, water; and (iii) an effective amount of an insect repellent material
which is sufficient to repel insects from such hard surface after application of the
detergent composition thereto. The liquid detergent composition is free of an insecticide.
[0005] The present invention is predicated on the discovery that the insect repellent properties
of a repellent material is enhanced with regard to a specific area or location when
such area or location is cleaned with a detergent composition as herein described.
This effect may be attributed to the natural tendency of insects to preferentially
congregate in soiled areas rather than upon a cleaned surface as well as the increased
substantivity of the insect repellent material to such washed or cleaned surfaces.
[0006] The term "insect" is used herein in its broad sense and, is intended to encompass
cockroaches, such as the German (Blattela germanica) and American (Periplaneta americana)
roach, as well as mosquitoes, moths, flies, fleas, ants, lice and arachnids, such
as spiders, ticks and mites.
[0007] The term "insect repellent material" is intended to encompass a wide variety of materials
having insect repellent properties which are compatible with the type of detergent
composition described herein and which manifest a sufficient substantivity to the
hard surface to which the detergent composition is applied to be efficacious as a
repellent.
[0008] Included among the insect repellent materials useful for the present invention are
the following compounds which may be used individually or in combination with other
repellent materials, the designation in parenthesis following certain compound names
referring to its commercial or common designation:
[0009] N-alkyl neoalkanamides wherein the alkyl is of 1 to 4 carbon atoms, and the neoalkanoyl
moiety is of 7 to 14 carbon atoms, preferably N-methyl neodecanamide:
N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET);
2-Hydroxyethyl-n-octyl sulfide (MGK 874);¹
N-Octyl bicycloheptene dicarboximide (MGK 264);
A preferred mixture of the above two materials comprising 66% MGK 264 and 33%
MGK 874;
Hexahydrodibenzofuran carboxaldehyde (MGK 11);
Di-n-propyl isocinchomerate (MGK 326);
2-Ethyl-1,3-hexanediol (Rutgers 612);
2-(n-butyl)-2-ethyl-1,3-propanediol;
Dimethyl phthalate;
Dibutyl succinate (Tabutrex);
Piperonyl butoxide; and
Pyrethrum
(1) MGK Repellents are trademarks of McLaughlin Gormley King Company; Minneapolis; Minnesota,
USA.
[0010] Although the above-mentioned insect repellent materials are longer lasting and are
preferred for purposes of the present invention, other useful repellent materials
include essential oils such as Mentha arvensis (Cornmint); Mentha piperita (Peppermint);
Mentha spicata (American Spearmint); Mentha cardica (Scotch Spearmint); Lemongrass
East Indian Oil; Lemon Oil; Citronella; Cedarwood (Juniperus virginiana L.); and Pine
Oil. Terpenoids are another class of materialshaving insect repellent properties,
the most useful being (-)-Limonene; (+)-Limonene; (-)-Carvone; Cineole (Eucalyptol);
Linalool; Gum Camphor; Citronellal; Alpha and Beta -Terpineol; Fencholic acid; Borneol
iso Borneol, Bornyl acetate and iso Bornyl acetate.
[0011] Among the non-commercial repellent materials useful for the invention are the following:
N,N-Diethyl cyclohexylacetamide (DECA)
1,2,3,6-Tetrahydro-1-(2-methyl-1-oxopentyl) piperidine
N,N-Diethyl-3-cyclohexyl propionamide (DCP)
2-Ethyl-1-(2-methyl-1-oxo-2-butenyl) piperidine
N,N-diethyl nonanamide, and
N,N-Diethyl Phenylacetamide.
[0012] With regard to the aforementioned N-alkyl neoalkanamides, the alkyl group is preferably
methyl or ethyl, and most preferably is methyl. The neoalkanoyl moiety is preferably
neodecanoyl or neotridecanoyl.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0013] The detergent compositions of the invention contain a detersive proportion of one
or more surface active detergent compounds from among anionic, nonionic, cationic
and amphoteric detergents, which generally will be in the range of from about 1 to
about 30%, by weight, of the composition, preferably from about 2 to about 20%, by
weight. The detergent is preferably a synthetic organic detergent of the anionic or
nonionic type and often a combination of anionic and nonionic detergents will be most
preferred. Descriptions of many such detergents are found in the text
Surface Active Agents and Detergents, Vol, II, pages 25-138, by Schwartz, Perry and Berch, published in 1958 by Interscience
Publishers, Inc. Such compounds are also described in a 1973 publication by John W.
McCutcheon, entitled
Detergents and Emulsifiers. Both such publications are incorporated herein by reference.
[0014] The anionic detergents employed will normally be salts of alkali metals, such as
sodium or potassium or ammonium or lower alkanolammonium salts, e.g., triethanolamine
salts. The anionic detergent may be a sulfate, sulfonate, phosphate or phosphonate
or salt of other suitable acid but usually will be a sulfate or sulfonate. The anionic
detergents include a lipophilic group, which will normally have from 10 to 18 carbon
atoms, preferably in linear higher alkyl arrangement, but other lipophilic groups
may be present instead, preferably including 12 to 16 carbon atoms, such as branched
chain alkyl benzene. Examples of suitable anionic detergents include higher fatty
alcohol sulfonates, such as sodium tridecylbenzene sulfonate; sodium linear alkyl
benzene sulfonates, e.g., sodium linear dodecylbenzene sulfonate; olefin sulfonates;
and paraffin sulfonates. The anionic detergents are preferably sodium salts but potassium,
ammonium and triethanolammonium salts are often more desirable for some liquid compositions.
[0015] The suitable nonionic detergents will normally be condensation products of lipophilic
compounds or moieties and lower alkylene oxides or polyalkoxy moieties. Highly preferable
lipophiles are higher fatty alcohols of 10 to 18 carbon atoms but alkyl phenols, such
as octyl and nonyl phenols, may also be used. The alkylene oxide of preference is
ethylene oxide and normally from 3 to 30 moles of ethylene oxide will be present per
mole of lipophile. Preferably such ethoxylate content will be 3 to 10 moles per mole
of higher fatty alcohol and more preferably it will be 6 to 7 moles, e.g., 6.5 or
7 moles per mole of higher fatty alcohol (and per mole of nonionic detergent). Both
broad ranges ethoxylates and narrow range ethoxylate (BRE's and NRE's) may be employed,
with the difference between them being in the "spread" of number of ethoxylate groups
present, which average within the ranges given. For example, NRE's which average 5
to 10 EtO groups per mole in the nonionic detergent will have at least 70% of the
EtO content in polyethoxy groups of 4 to 12 moles of EtO and will preferably have
over 85% of the EtO content in such range. BRE nonionic detergents have a broader
range of ethoxy contents than NRE's, often with a spread from 1 to 15 moles of EtO
when the EtO chain is in the 5 to 10 EtO range (average). Examples of the BRE nonionic
detergents include those sold by Shell Chemical Company under the trademark Neodol
R, including Neodol 25-7, Neodol 23-6.5 and Neodol 25-3. Supplies of NRE nonionic detergents
have been obtained from Shell Development Company, which identifies such materials
as 23-7P and 23-7Z.
[0016] Cationic surface active compounds may also be employed. They comprise surface active
detergent compounds which contain an organic hydrophobic group which forms part of
a cation when the compound is dissolved in water, and an anionic group. Typical cationic
detergents are amine and quaternary ammonium compounds.
[0017] The quaternary ammonium compounds useful herein are known materials and are of the
high-softening type. Included are the N₁N-di-(higher) C₁₄-C₂₄, N₁N-di(lower C₁-C₄
alkyl quaternary ammonium salts with water solubilizing anions such as halide, e.g.
chloride, bromide and iodide; sulfate, methosulfate and the like and the heterocyclic
amides such as imidazolinium.
[0018] For convenience, the aliphatic quaternary ammonium salts may be structurally defined
as follows:

wherein R and R₁ represent alkyl of 14 to 24 and preferably 14 to 22 carbon atoms;
R₂ and R₃ represent lower alkyl of 1 to 4 and preferably 1 to 3 carbon atoms, X represents
an anion capable of imparting water solubility or dispersibility including the aforementioned
chloride, bromide, iodide, sulfate and methosulfate. Particularly preferred species
of aliphatic quats include:
distearyl dimethylammonium chloride
di-hydrogenated tallow dimethyl ammonium chloride
di tallow dimethyl ammonium chloride
distearyl dimethyl ammonium methyl sulfate
di-hydrogenated tallow dimethyl ammonium methyl sulfate.
[0019] Amphoteric detergents are also suitable for the invention. This class of detergents
is well known in the art and many operable detergents are disclosed by Schwartz, Perry
and Berch in "Surface Active Agents and Detergents", Vol. II, Interscience Publishers,
Inc., New York (1958) in Chapter 4 thereof. Examples of suitable amphoteric detergents
include: alkyl betaiminodipropionates, RN(C₂H₄COOM)₂; and alkyl beta-amino propionates,
RN(H)C₂H₄COOM.
[0020] Builders may be present in the liquid detergent composition in an amount of from
about 1 to 20% to improve the detergency of the synthetic organic detergents. Such
builders may be inorganic or organic, water soluble or water insoluble. Included among
such builders are polyphosphates, e.g., sodium tripolyphosphate; carbonates, e.g.,
sodium carbonate; bicarbonates, e.g., sodium bicarbonate; borates, e.g., borax; and
silicates, e.g., sodium silicate; water insoluble inorganic builders, including zeolites,
e.g., hydrated Zeolite 4A; and water soluble organic builders, including citrates,
gluconates, NTA, and polyacetal carboxylates.
[0021] Various adjuvants may be present in the detergent compositions such as fluorescent
brighteners, antistatic agents, antibacterial agents, fungicides, foaming agents,
anti-foams, flow promoters, suspending agents, antioxidants, anti-gelling agents,
soil release promoting agents, and enzymes.
[0022] The liquid detergent compositions of the invention will generally comprise from about
2 to 20% of surface active detergent compounds which are preferably anionic and/or
nonionic, from about 1 to 20%, by weight, of builder salts for such detergents and
from about 0.2 to 20%, preferably 0.5 to 10%, by weight, of the insect repellent material,
the balance being predominantly water, adjuvants and optionally an emulsifying agent,
or hydrotrope such as sodium toluene sulfonate or a solvent suitable for the insect
repellent material such as isopropyl alcohol or acetone. To facilitate the incorporation
of a fragrance or perfume into the aqueous liquid detergent composition, it is often
advantageous to formulate the liquid detergent composition in microemulsion form with
water as the continuous phase and oil or hydrocarbon as the dispersed phase.
[0023] In practical tests, on actual kitchen floors, counters, drainboards and walls, and
in kitchen cabinets and under refrigerators, in roach-infested apartments, significantly
fewer roaches will be observed on surfaces to which or near which the invented liquid
detergent compositions are applied than on control surfaces, and fewer roaches are
found on the bottoms and shelves of cabinets and pantries when walls thereof are treated
with the invented detergent compositions. When floors, walls, counters, sinks, cabinets
and doors in a house or apartment are treated with the liquid detergent compositions
of the invention, the incidence of cockroach infestation is reduced, compared to control
apartments where no repellent is applied.
EXAMPLE 1
[0024] A single composition in accordance with the invention formulated as shown below was
used as the starting material to prepare by dilution six liquid compositions of varying
degrees of dilution containing six correspondingly different levels of N-methyl neodecanamide
(MNDA) insect repellent material.
| LIQUID HARD SURFACE CLEANER |
| COMPONENT |
WEIGHT PERCENTAGE |
| Sodium linear dodecylbenzene sulfonate |
4 |
| Nonionic detergent(1) |
2 |
| MNDA |
2.0 |
| Coconut fatty acid |
0.5 |
| Soda ash |
2 |
| Sodium bicarbonate |
1 |
| Isopropyl alcohol |
4 |
| Water |
Balance |
| Fragrance |
1 |
| (1)Condensation product of one mole of a mixture of fatty alcohols of 9-11 carbon atoms
with 6 moles of ethylene oxide. |
[0025] The percentage of MNDA in each of the six tested detergent compositions varied, respectively,
as follows: 0.12, 0.20, 0.22, 0.29, 0.4 and 2.0%
[0026] The insect repellency of each of these six hard surface cleaning detergent compositions
was tested by the procedure described below and compared with the repellency imparted
by three repellent-containing comparative compositions, i.e. three solutions of acetone
containing 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0%, by weight, respectively, of MNDA.
TEST PROCEDURE
[0027] Insects -- German and American cockroaches were from established colonies maintained at 27°C.
Carpenter ant workers were collected from a log containing a queenright colony and
were kept in the same conditions as the cockroaches.
[0028] Bioassay -- Forty-eight hours prior to initiation of an assay, 50 male German cockroaches
were allowed to acclimate to the plastic test cages (51 x 28 x 20 cm) with food and
water available in the center. A thin film of teflon emulsion (Fluon AD-1, Northern
products, Woonsocket, R.I.) on the sides of the cages restricted the insects to the
floor of the cage. The assays used either 50 female German cockroaches, 20 males American
Cockroaches, or 50 carpenter ant workers.
[0029] The repellency of the various compositions to be tested were evaluated over time.
The procedure consisted of arranging five 3 x 3 inch asphalt tiles into a cubic shelter
("cup") and treating the tiles with the various test compositions. The treated sides
faced inward. The method relies on the light avoidance response of the cockroaches.
Two milliliters of a test composition was applied to the entire inside surface of
the cup. Control cups were treated with acetone or water only. The cups were allowed
to dry for 1 hr and then a control and a treated cup were inverted into each of the
test cages. Food and water were provided in the center of each cage, outside of the
cups. The number of insects resting on the inner walls of each cup were recorded in
the middle of the photophase daily for 25 days or until equal numbers were found in
treated and untreated cups. After each count the insects were disturbed and the positions
of the treated and control cups were reversed. Accordingly, the distribution of cockroaches
for any given day is considered independent of the previous days distribution.
[0030] Repellency was defined as the percentage of insects that avoided the treated surfaces
and was calculated as

where N
t is the number of insects on the treated surface and N
c is the number on the acetone treated control surfaces. The repellency of compounds
was evaluated on the basis of the number of days of 90% repellency which is based
on (i) the number of days of complete (100%) repellency and (ii) a maximum likelihood
probit analysis of time/repellency (SAS User's Guide, SAS Institute 1985) from which
a measure was calculated of the number of days of 90% repellency (RT₉₀ --10% of the
insects on the treated surface, 90% on the control surface).
[0031] The results of the repellency tests are indicated in Figure 1 which is a graph showing
the number of days with 90% repellency as a function of the percent of MNDA in the
test composition.
[0032] As noted in the Figure, the comparative compositions not in accordance with the invention
were unable to achieve 90% repellency at a level of MNDA repellent of 0.25%. In contrast
thereto, the compositions of the invention were able to provide almost 3 days of 90%
repellency at a 0.2% level of MNDA.
1. An aqueous liquid detergent composition for cleaning a hard surface and for repelling
insects therefrom comprising (i) a detersive proportion of a surface active detergent
compound selected from the group consisting of anionic, nonionic, cationic and amphoteric
detergent compounds and mixtures thereof; (ii) at least about 50%, by weight, water;
and (iii) and effective amound of an insect repellent material which is sufficient
to repel insects from such hard surface after application of the liquid detergent
composition thereto, said liquid detergent composition being free of an insecticide.
2. A liquid detergent composition as in claim 1 wherein said insect prellent material
is selected from the group consisting of N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET), 2-Hydroxyethyl-n-octyl
sulfide (MGK 874), N-Octyl bicycloheptene dicarboximide (MGK 264), a mixture comprising
MGK 264 and MGK 874 in combination, Hexahydrodibenzofuran carboxaldehyde (MGK 11),
Di-n-propyl isocinchomerate (MGK 326), 2-Ethyl-1,3-hexanediol (Rutgers 612), 2-(n-butyl)-2-ethyl-1,3-propanediol,
Dimethyl phthalate, Dibutyl succinate (Tabutrex), Piperonyl butoxide, and Pyrethrum.
3. A liquid detergent composition as in claim 1 further including a water-soluble solvent
for said insect repellent material.
4. A liquid detergent composition as in claim 3 wherein said solvent is isopropyl alcohol.
5. A liquid detergent composition as in claim 1 comprising from about 2 to 20%, by weight,
of said surface active detergent compounds, from about 1 to 20%, by weight, of a builder
salt, and from about 0.2 to 20%, by weight, of said insect repellent material.
6. A liquid detergent composition as in claim 5 wherein said insect repellent material
is N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide.
7. A liquid detergent composition as in claim 1 wherein said insect repellent material
is N-methyl neodecanamide
8. A process for cleaning a hard surface and for repelling insects therefrom comprising
applying to said hard surface a liquid detergent composition comprising (i) a detersive
proportion of a surface active detergent compound selected from the group consisting
of anionic, nonionic, cationic and amphoteric detergent compounds; (ii) at least about
50%, by weight, water; and (iii) an effective amount of an insect repellent material
which is sufficient to repel insects from such hard surface after application of the
liquid detergent composition thereto, said liquid detergent composition being free
of an insecticide.
9. A process according to claim 8 wherein said insect repellent material is selected
from the group consisting of N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET), 2-Hydroxyethyl-n-octyl
sulfide (MGK 874), N-Octyl bicycloheptene dicarboximide (MGK 264), a mixture comprising
MGK 264 and MGK 874 in combination, Hexahydrodibenzofuran carboxaldehyde (MGK 11),
Di-n-propyl isocinchomerate (MGK 326), 2-Ethyl-1,3-hexanediol (Rutgers 612), 2-(n-butyl)-2-ethyl-1,3-propanediol,
Dimethyl phthalate, Dibutyl succinate (Tabutrex), Piperonyl butoxide, and Pyrethrum.
10. A process according to claim 8 wherein said detergent composition further includes
a solvent for said insect repellent material.
11. A process according to claim 10 wherein said solvent is isopropyl alcohol.
12. A process according to claim 8 wherein said detergent composition comprises from about
2 to 20%, by weight, of said surface active detergent compound, from about 1 to 20%,
by weight, of a builder salt, and from about 0.2 to 20%, by weight, of said insect
repellent material.
13. A process according to claim 8 wherein said insect repellent material is N-alkyl neodecanamide.