Technical Field
[0001] This invention relates to a cushioning structure having enhanced heat-resistance
and flame-retardancy, and a vehicle seat molded therefrom.
Background Art
[0002] In recent years, there is an increasing demand for imparting enhanced heat resistance
and flame retardancy to cushioning articles used for, for example, household furniture,
beds, particularly beds in hospitals and facilities for old people, and vehicle seats
in transport facilities including airplanes. Especially, as is well known, very strict
flame retardancy requirements for airplane seats must be satisfied under Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) in the United States for saving a life from the fire.
[0003] To meet the above-mentioned demand, flame-retarded polyurethanes are widely used
which are made by incorporating a phosphorus-containing flame retardant in a polyurethane-forming
material in the process of making polyurethane. However, there is a problem such that,
with an enhancement of flame retardancy, a flame-retarded polyurethane cushioning
article becomes to feel hard and becomes dense and heavy, and thus, the comfortableness
is reduced. Comfortableness and light-weight are always required for cushioning articles,
and especially, there is recently a strong demand for light-weight seats of automobiles
and airplanes. Further, polyurethane cushioning articles have a problem in industrial
waste incineration.
[0004] Cushioning articles comprising a wadding of polyester fibers have also been recently
used, in which the fibers are either bonded at intersecting points of fibers by a
resin binder or a low-temperature-melting fiber binder, or not bonded. The cushioning
articles of polyester fibers, which are not bonded at intersecting points of fibers,
are apt to be deformed during the use because the wadding is not fixed and the fibers
are not restricted in movement, and their bulkiness and resilience are reduced because
the crimp of fibers fades away. The cushioning articles of polyester fibers, which
are bonded at intersecting points of fibers, also have similar problems to some extent
because the bonding at intersecting points of fibers is not stable and the crimp of
fibers fades away. Further, in these cushioning articles, with an enhancement of flame-retardancy,
the bulkiness and resilience are reduced and the comfortableness becomes lost.
Disclosure of Invention
[0005] A primary object of the present invention is to provide a cushioning structure exhibiting
an enhanced flame retardancy with a minimized reduction in comfortableness, and having
good heat resistance and light-weight and having no problem in industrial waste incineration,
and to provide a vehicle seat made the cushioning structure.
[0006] In one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a heat-resistant and flame-retardant
cushioning structure comprising (a) a matrix composed of a bulky non-woven web of
a crimped non-elastic staple fiber, (b) a crimped-flame retardant staple fiber exhibiting
a residual weight of at least 35% as tested by a non-flaming heating test method,
and (c) a thermoplastic elastic fiber; the crimped flame-retardant staple fiber (b)
and the thermoplastic elastic fiber (c) being dispersed in the matrix (a) and at least
part of intersecting points of the thermoplastic elastic fiber (c) with the other
fibers (a) and (b) are fusion bonded.
[0007] In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a heat-resistant and
flame-retardant cushioning structure having a double-layer structure composed of an
inner layer of a bulky nonwoven web and an outer layer enveloping the inner layer;
said outer layer comprising (a) a matrix composed of a bulky non-woven web of a crimped
non-elastic staple fiber, (b) a crimped flame-retardant staple fiber exhibiting a
residual weight of at least 35% as tested by a glowing test method, and (c) a thermoplastic
elastic fiber; the crimped flame-retardant staple fiber (b) and the thermoplastic
elastic fiber (c) being dispersed in the matrix (a) and at least part of intersecting
points of the thermoplastic elastic fiber (c) with the other fibers (a) and (b) are
fusion bonded.
[0008] In still another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a vehicle seat
molded from the abovementioned cushioning structure.
Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention
[0009] The matrix of the cushioning structure of the present invention is composed of a
bulky non-woven web of a crimped non-elastic staple fiber. As preferable examples
of the crimped non-elastic staple fiber, there can be mentioned a polyester fiber
and an aramid fiber. The crimped non-elastic polyester staple fiber includes, for
example, staple fibers or mixed staple fibers of polyethylene terephthalate, polybutylene
terephthalate, polytetramethylene terephthalate, poly-1,4-dimethylcyclohexane terephthalate,
polyethylene naphthalate, polypivarolactone and copolyesters thereof, polyesters,
and composite staple fibers composed of two or more of these polyesters. Preferable
polyester fibers have incorporated therein a phosphorus or halogen compound to enhance
the flame retardancy and heat resistance. The crimped nonelastic aramid fibers include,
for example, a meta-aramid fiber and a para-aramid fiber. Of these, a meta-aramid
fiber is preferable because it has not only good flame retardancy and heat resistance
but also enhanced mechanical properties such as strength and modulus as well as good
crimp-imparting property and crimp-fastness.
[0010] The shape of cross-section of the crimped non-elastic staple fiber is not particularly
limited, the cross-section may be any of circular, oblong (i.e., fiber is flat), odd-shaped
and hollow forms. The crimped non-elastic staple fiber preferably has a thickness
of 4 to 300 deniers, more preferably a thickness of 6 to 100 deniers. If the single
fiber thickness is too small, the density of the cushioning structure is large and
the cushioning structure becomes inelastic. In contrast, if the single fiber thickness
is too large, the cushioning structure has poor handling characteristics and the web-forming
property becomes deteriorated. Further, a large single fiber thickness leads to reduction
in number of fibers in the web, and thus, the cushioning structure becomes inelastic
and has a poor durability and a coarse feeling.
[0011] The crimp of the non-elastic staple fiber constituting the matrix of the cushioning
structure of the present invention is important. Namely, the crimp is an important
factor for imparting bulkiness and cushioning characteristics to the cushioning structure
and for rendering the cushioning structure light-weight. Preferably, the crimped non-elastic
staple fiber has an initial bulkiness of 40 to 120 cm³/gr, more preferably 50 to 120
cm³/gr and most preferably 70 to 120 cm³/gr. Further, the crimped non-elastic staple
fiber has a bulkiness under a load of 10 gr/cm² of preferably 15 to 50 cm³/gr, more
preferably 20 to 50 gr/cm³ and most preferably 30 to 50 cm³/gr. The initial bulkiness
and the bulkiness under a load of 10 gr/cm² are determined under a load of 0.5 gr/cm²
and a load of 10 gr/cm², respectively, according to JIS 1015. If the initial bulkiness
and the bulkiness under a load of 10 gr/cm² are larger than the above-mentioned ranges,
the staple fiber becomes to card. If these bulkinesses are smaller than the above-mentioned
ranges, the cushioning properties become poor.
[0012] These bulkinesses can be obtained usually when the number of crimps of the staple
fiber is 5 to 15 per inch, preferably 8 to 15 per inch, and the percentage crimp thereof
is 15 to 35%, preferably 20 to 35%. The number of crimps and the percentage crimp
are determined according to JIS 1015.
[0013] The preferred bulkiness is obtained by appropriately selecting the single fiber thickness
and the crimp characteristics. With regard to the density which is in inverse proportion
to the bulkiness, the density of the cushioning structure is preferably 0.01 to 0.06
gr/cm³ and more preferably 0.02 to 0.05 gr/cm³. If the density is smaller than 0.01
gr/cm³, the structure is too loose and is not springy. If the density exceeds 0.06
gr/cm³, the structure is springy but is not light-weight.
[0014] Another important factor of the cushioning structure is how to set the matrix fibers
as a structural body. Namely, the matrix fibers should be set so that the cushioning
structure withstands deformation under stress and, when stress is relieved, it is
immediately restored to the original shape.
[0015] The matrix of the cushioning structure of the present invention is set by thermally
bonding thermoplastic elastic fibers. The thermal bonding is beneficial in that the
matrix is effectively set and the working atmosphere is good and safe, as compared
with a wet bonding procedure using a liquid binder.
[0016] The thermal bonding is effected by using a thermoplastic elastic fiber having a melting
point much lower, preferably at least 60°C lower, than that of the crimped non-elastic
staple fiber constituting the matrix. (the thermoplastic elastic fiber is hereinafter
described in detail)
It is to be noted that the matrix of the heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning
structure of the present invention is set by using a thermoplastic elastic fiber which
is not flame-retardant, but the cushioning structure exhibits good heat resistance
and flame retardancy. More specifically, this is achieved by dispersing a crimped
flame-retardant staple fiber exhibiting a residual weight of at least 35% as tested
by a non-flaming heating test method in the matrix composed of a bulky non-woven web
of a crimped non-elastic staple fiber. In other words, both the matrix fiber and the
flame-retardant staple fiber are thermally set by using a thermoplastic elastic fiber
whereby a cushioning structure having good flame retardancy, bulkiness, heat resistance
and durability.
[0017] The residual weight of the crimped flame-retardant staple fiber is determined according
to a non-flaming heating test as follows. An electric heater is provided in a cubic
box, each side of which has a size of 50 cm. One gram of a test sample is placed in
a cage so that the sample is not dripped when molten, and the cage is placed in the
center of the cubic box. The sample is subjected to a thermal decomposition treatment
by heating at 750°C for 4 minutes. The heating temperature is measured by using a
thermocouple placed on a sample stage. The residual weight is calculated from the
weight reduction as measured after the thermal decomposition.
[0018] The ratio of the amount of the crimped flame-retardant staple fiber having a residual
weight of at least 35% to the amount of the matrix fiber, i.e., the crimped non-elastic
staple fiber is preferably in the range of 0.1/1 to 1/1 by weight. If this ratio is
larger than 1/1, the cushioning structure has poor bulkiness and durability. If this
ratio is smaller than 0.1/1, the flame retardancy is lowered. Even when a flame retardant
staple fiber having a residual weight of 35% or lower is used, flame retardancy can
be obtained to some extent if the amount used is large, but the bulkiness and durability
of the cushioning structure are considerably lowered.
[0019] As examples of the flame-retardant fiber having a residual weight of at least 35%,
there can be mentioned a pre-oxidized acrylonitrile polymer fiber which is prepared
by pre-oxidizing an acrylonitrile polymer and which is commercially available in the
trade name of, for example, "Lastan" and "Pyromex", a completely carbonized carbon
fiber, a crosslinked phenolic resin fiber which is commercially available in the tradename
of, for example, "Kynol", and polybenzimidazole fiber (PBI). Of these, a pre-oxidized
acrylonitile polymer fiber is preferable.
[0020] The crimped flame-retardant staple fiber has a single fiber thickness preferably
not larger than 8 deniers, more preferably not larger than 5 deniers. If the single
fiber thickness is too large, the number of fibers in the web is decreased and thus
the flame retardancy is reduced. However, too small single fiber thickness badly influences
the web formation, and therefore, the single fiber thickness should preferably be
at least about 1 denier.
[0021] As hereinbefore described, there can be mentioned a polyester fiber and an aramid
fiber as preferable examples of the crimped non-elastic staple fiber used in the cushioning
structure of the present invention. The use of a polyester fiber or an aramid fiber
in combination with the above-mentioned flame-retardant fiber is described in DE 3307449-A1,
GB 2183265 and GB 2152542. However, this combination is used for a continuous yarn
such as a spun yarn, and thus, these references teach only that this combination imparts
flame retardancy to a two-dimensional fabric. These references are silent on the use
of this combination for a three-dimensional fibrous structure, namely, the references
suggest nothing about a flame-retardant cushioning structure having good bulkiness
and durability.
[0022] The cushioning structure of the present invention is characterized in that the above-mentioned
crimped flame-retardant staple fiber (b) is dispersed in a matrix composed of a crimped
non-elastic staple fiber (a), and further, a thermoplastic elastic fiber (c) is incorporated
in the matrix, and that at least part of intersecting points of the thermoplastic
elastic fiber (c) with the crimped non-elastic staple fiber (a) and the crimped flame-retardant
staple fiber (b) are fusion-bonded. The ratio of the thermoplastic elastic fiber (c)
varies depending upon the particular thermoplastic elastic fiber used, but this ratio
is preferably 10 to 50% based on the total weight of the cushioning structure. If
this ratio is smaller than 10%, the cushioning structure has a good flame retardancy,
but the number of fusion-bonded intersecting points are few and hence the durability
is poor. If this ratio exceeds 50%, the flame retardancy becomes poor. When the ratio
of the thermoplastic elastic fiber is in the range of 10 to 50% based on the total
weight, both the crimped non-elastic staple fiber and the crimped flame-retardant
staple fiber are fusion-bonded to a considerable extent whereby no laminar separation
occurs in the thickness direction of the cushioning structure and the cushioning structure
becomes springy and durable.
[0023] A preferable thermoplastic elastomer fiber used for the formation of fusion-bonded
intersections is a composite fiber made of a thermoplastic elastomer and a non-elastic
polyester and having a melting point at least 60°C lower than that of the crimped
non-elastic staple fiber constituting the matrix. If the difference in melting point
is smaller than 60°C, the thermoplastic elastic fiber is deteriorated when heated,
and the elastic fiber tends to badly influence the matrix fiber.
[0024] A thermoplastic elastomer occupies preferably at least 1/2 of the surface area of
the composite fiber. The ratio of the thermoplastic elastomer to the non-elastic polyester
is preferably in the range of 30/70 to 70/30.
[0025] The composite fiber may be either a side-by-side type or a sheath-core type, but
the latter is preferable. In the sheath-core type composite fiber, the non-elastic
polyester forms the core, and the shape of the cross-section of the core may be either
concentric circle or eccentric circle. The eccentric circle is more preferable because
coil-shaped elastic crimps develop in the composite fiber.
[0026] As the thermoplastic elastomer, there can be mentioned, for example, polyurethane
elastomers and polyether-polyester elastomers. As the non-elastic polyester, there
can be mentioned, for example, polyethylene terephthalate and polybutylene terephthalate.
Polybutylene terephthalate having rubber elasticity is especially preferable.
[0027] The thermoplastic elastomer fiber should be chosen in due consideration of not only
melting point but also cushioning performance. More specifically, when a crimped flame-retardant
staple fiber having a small number of crimps is used, large fusion-bonded areas should
preferably be formed in the intersecting points thereof. Since the fusion-bonded areas
are comprised of the elastomer, the areas can be deformed in accordance with the stress
imposed and, when the stress is relieved, the areas can be immediately restored to
the original shape. Further, the elastomer fiber exhibits a good recovery from elongation,
and, when stress is repeatedly imposed, there is neither breakage nor residual strain.
Therefore, although the crimped flame-retardant staple has small crimps, a good cushioning
performance can be obtained by the thermoplastic elastomer fiber. In this respect,
the thermoplastic elastomer fiber preferably has a single fiber diameter larger than
that of the crimped flame-retardant staple fiber.
[0028] The thermoplastic elastomer fiber preferably has an elongation at break of at least
500% and a stress at 300% elongation of not larger than 0.6 kg/mm², and a recovery
at 300% elongation of at least 60%. If the elongation at break is smaller than 500%,
the cushioning structure cannot withstand a large stress. If the the stress at 300%
elongation exceeds 0.6 kg/mm², the deformation of the cushioning structure is not
smooth due to the high stress, and the comfortableness is lowered. If the recovery
at 300% elongation is smaller than 60%, the recovery after the stress relief is not
satisfactory.
[0029] In other words, the cushioning structure of the present invention is characterized
in that, even when a relatively small amount (i.e., an amount smaller than that of
the matrix fiber) of the crimped flame-retardant staple fiber is incorporated in the
matrix fiber to provide a cushioning structure passing the FAA standard, an acceptable
cushioning performance can be attained by the fact that the crimped matrix staple
fiber and the thermoplastic elastic fiber exhibit a synergistic springy action and
supplement the small crimps of the flame-retardant staple fibers.
[0030] The cushioning structure of the present invention may have a structure which is entirely
composed of a substantially uniform mixture of the above-mentioned crimped non-elastic
staple fiber, crimped flame-retardant staple fiber and thermoplastic elastomer fiber.
Alternatively, the cushioning structure may have a double layer structure composed
of inner layer of a bulky non-woven web and an outer layer enveloping the inner layer,
which outer layer is composed of the above-mentioned crimped non-elastic staple fiber,
crimped flame-retardant staple fiber and thermoplastic elastomer fiber. Although the
inner layer of the double layer structure may be composed of the abovementioned three
fibers, a good flame retardancy is imparted by the outer layer, and therefore, the
inner layer is preferably composed of the crimped non-elastic staple fiber and the
thermoplastic elastomer fiber with due regard to the bulkiness and durability of the
entire cushioning structure.
[0031] The crimped non-elastic staple fiber used for the inner layer of the preferred double-layered
cushioning structure is preferably made of a polyester in view of satisfactory mechanical
properties such as strength and modulus as well as good crimping characteristics such
as a crimp imparting property and a crimp fastness. The thermoplastic elastomer fiber
used in combination with the crimped non-elastic staple fiber for the inner layer
is preferably made of an elastomer selected from those which are used for the outer
layer. The amount of the thermoplastic elastomer fiber used for the inner layer is
preferably 10 to 50% by weight based on the weight of the inner layer in view of the
bulkiness and durability of the entire cushioning structure.
[0032] The thermoplastic elastomer fibers are incorporated in the inner layer and the outer
layer, and hence, the two layers are firmly bonded to each other and the bonded interface
between the two layers is not clear. Thus the cushioning structure has a peeling strength
of at least 1.0 kg as measured by applying a peel force in the thickness direction,
and is very durable. The peeling strength is determined according to ASTM D 3574 wherein
a reinforcing fabric is adhered onto a cushioning structure by an adhesive, the adhered
assembly is pressed under a pressure of 10 kg/cm² for 24 hours, and then the peeling
strength is measured on a sample having a width of 25 mm by applying a peel force
at a peel rate of 50 mm/min.
[0033] The thickness and density of the outer layer of the double layered cushioning structure
can be appropriately chosen, but are preferably 3 to 10 mm and 200 to 500 g/m², respectively,
from viewpoints of flame retardancy and fastness to surface rubbing.
[0034] The cushioning structure of the present invention is usually made by a procedure
wherein the crimped flame retardant staple fiber and the thermoplastic elastomer fiber
are incorporated with a matrix of the crimped non-elastic staple fiber, and at least
part of the intersecting points between the thermoplastic elastomer fiber and the
crimped non-elastic staple fiber and/or the crimped flame-retardant staple fiber are
fusion-bonded whereby the three fibers are formed into an integrated body. For making
a uniform cushioning structure having a good performance by a process as short as
possible, the crimped non-elastic staple fiber, it is preferable that the crimped
flame-retardant staple fiber and the thermoplastic elastomer fiber are combined together
and thoroughly mixed, and the mixture is then heat-treated at a temperature 20°C to
60°C higher than the melting point of the thermoplastic elastomer fiber to be thereby
fusion-bonded. If the heating temperature is too low, the polymers do not flow in
a molten state to the desired extent at intersecting points of staple fibers, with
the results of reduction in the number of fusion-bonded points and reduction in rebound
of the cushioning structure. If the heating temperature is too high, the thermoplastic
elastomer fiber is subject to thermal deterioration and the physical properties at
the thermally bonded points are degraded.
[0035] The heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure having a double layer
structure is made by a procedure wherein a bulky nonwoven web for the inner layer
and that for the outer layer are separately prepared by combining together and mixing
thoroughly the respective fibers, the bulky nonwoven web of the inner layer is enveloped
by the bulky nonwoven web of the outer layer, and the combined bulky nonwoven webs
are heat-treated in the above-mentioned manner whereby the fibers are fusion-bonded.
[0036] The cushioning structure is molded into a vehicle seat and other cushion articles.
A vehicle seat is made by a process wherein a non-heat-treated bulky web of mixed
fibers is packed in a mold and then heat-treated, or a process wherein fibers are
combined together and mixed, the thus-obtained mixed web is heat-treated at a temperature
lower than the heat-treating temperature for fusion-bonding whereby the web is temporarily
bonded, the web is then cut to a shape approximately similar to a mold cavity, the
cut web is packed in the mold, and the packed web is heat-treated to effect fusion-bonding,
or a process wherein fibers are combined together and mixed to form a web, the web
is heat-treated to effect fusion-bonding, the fusion-bonded web is cut into several
parts, and the parts are adhered by using a binder and simultaneously molded in a
mold. Other processes can be employed such as, for example, a process using a sliver
as described in EP 0483386-A1 and a process comprising blowing fibers in a mold as
described in JP-A 3-121091.
[0037] By the term "vehicle seat" used herein we mean seats in a broad sense, which include
seats of an automobile and other land transport facilities and seats of airplanes.
[0038] The cushioning structure of the present invention will now be described by the following
examples. Characteristics of fibers and cushioning structures are determined as follows.
(1) Characteristics of fibers
[0039]
(a) Fiber thickness (denier), number of crimps (CN) and percentage crimp (CD) are
determined according to JIS 1015.
(b) Initial bulkiness and bulkiness under load are determined according to JIS 1097
wherein bulkiness (cm³/gr) is measured under a load of 0.5 gr/cm² and a load of 10
gr/cm², respectively.
(2) Characteristics of cushioning structure
[0040]
(a) Density is determined according to JIS K 6401.
(b) Rebound is determined according to JIS K 6401.
(c) Compression residual strain is determined at 50% compression or after compression
is repeated 80,000 times according to JIS K 6401.
(d) Air permeability is determined according to JIS L 1079.
(e) FAA flame retardancy test is carried out according a combustion test employed
in the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, i.e., Federal Aviation Regulation, part
25 (25.853) (Airworthiness Standards, Transport Category Air Planes published June
1974, by U.S. Department of Transportation. The acceptable limits in the FAA combustion
test are weight reduction of not larger than 10%, distance burned at bottom of not
longer than 46 cm and distance burned at back of not longer than 43 cm.
Example 1
[0041] Meta-aramid fiber ("Conex" supplied by Teijin Ltd.) was used as a crimped non-elastic
staple fiber for a matrix; a pre-oxidized polyacrylonitrile fiber exhibiting a residual
weight of 48% as measured according to a glowing test ("Lastan", 2 deniers x 74 mm)
was used as a crimped flame-retardant staple fiber; and a composite fiber made as
follows was used as a thermoplastic elastomer fiber.
[0042] Mixed acid component composed of terephthalic acid and isophthalic acid (80/20 by
mole) and butylene glycol were polymerized to yield polybutylene terephthalate. 38%
by weight of the polybutylene terephthalate and 62% by weight of polybutylene glycol
having a molecular weight of 2,000 were heated to form a block co-polyether-polyester
elastomer. This thermoplastic elastomer had an intrinsic viscosity of 1.0, a melting
point of 155°C, an elongation at break of 1,500% (as measured on a film), a stress
at 300% elongation of 0.3 kg/mm² and a recovery at 300% elongation of 75%.
[0043] An eccentric sheath-core composite fiber was made by a conventional melt-spinning
process using 50% by weight of the above-mentioned thermoplastic elastomer as the
sheath and 50% by weight of polybutylene terephthalate as the core. The composite
fiber was drawn twice the original length, cut into a length of 64 mm, and heat-treated
in hot water at 95°C whereby the shrinkage of the composite fiber was reduced and
crimps were developed. After drying the treated fiber, an oiling agent was applied
to the fiber. This thermoplastic elastomer fiber had a single fiber thickness of 6
deniers.
[0044] A matrix mixed fiber composed of Conex and Lastan at a ratio of 1 : 0.2 was mixed
with the above-mentioned thermoplastic elastomer staple fiber to form a web at a mixing
ratio of 70% by weight and 30% by weight, respectively, by a card. A plurality of
the webs were superposed in a square plate-shaped mold so that the thickness and density
of the superposed webs are 10 cm and 0.05 g/cm³, respectively. The webs were heat-treated
at 200°C for 10 minutes to obtain a cushioning structure having a square plate shape.
This procedure was repeated wherein three kinds of Conex fibers having the same thickness
(13 deniers) and staple length (76 mm), but having different crimp characteristics
were separately used. The results are shown in Table I-1 (Run No. 1 to 3).
Example 2
[0045] The procedure of Example 1, Run No. 2 was repeated wherein the ratio of Conex to
Lastan was changed as shown in Table I-1 with all other conditions remaining the same.
The results are shown in Table I-1 (Run No. 4 and 5).
Example 3
[0046] The procedure of Example 1, Run No. 2 was repeated wherein the ratio of the thermoplastic
elastomer fiber to the entire amount of the three fibers was changed as shown in Table
I-2 with all other conditions remaining the same. The results are shown in Table I-2
(Run No. 6).
Example 4
[0047] The procedure of Example 1, Run No. 2 was repeated wherein the heat treating temperature
was changed as shown in Table I-2 with all other conditions remaining the same. The
results are shown in Table I-2 (Run No. 7).
Example 5
[0048] The procedure of Example 1, Run No. 2 was repeated wherein a crosslinked phenolic
resin fiber ("Kynol") having a thickness of 3 deniers and a staple length of 70 mm)
and a crosslinked melamine resin ("Basofil") having a thickness of 2.3 deniers and
a staple length of 75 mm were separately used with all other conditions remaining
the same. Run No. 9 is a comparative example which does not fall within the scope
of claims. The results are shown in Table I-2 (Run No. 8 and 9).
Example 6
[0049] The procedure of Example 1, Run No. 2 was repeated wherein (i) a polyethylene terephthalate
(PET) fiber having a thickness of 14 denier and a staple length of 64 mm, (ii) a fiber
of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) having copolymerized therein 0.7% by weight of
a phosphorus compound, which had a thickness of 13 deniers and a staple length of
51 mm and (iii) a poly-1,4-dimethylcyclohexane terephthalate (PCT) fiber having a
thickness of 25 deniers and a staple length of 76 mm were separately used as the matrix
staple fiber, and the ratio of the flame-retardant staple fiber to the matrix staple
fiber was changed as shown in Table II-1, Run No. 10 to 12, with all other conditions
remaining the same. The results are shown in Table II-1 (Run No. 10 to 12).
Example 7
[0050] A square plate-shaped cushioning structure having a double layer structure composed
of an outer layer A and an inner layer B was made as follows.
[0051] A meta-aramid fiber ("Conex") having a thcikness of 13 deniers and a staple length
of 76 mm as a matrix fiber and having characteristics shown in Table II-2, Run No.
13 was mixed together with a flame-retardant staple fiber and a thermoplastic elastomer
fiber, which fibers and mixing ratio were shown in Table II-2, Run No. 13, by a card
to obtain a web A for the outer layer A. 70% by weight of a polyethylene terephthalate
(PET) fiber having a thickness of 14 deniers and a staple length of 64 mm and having
characteristics shown in Table II-1, Run No. 10, as a matrix fiber and 30% by weight
of the same thermoplastic elastomer fiber as that used in Example 1 were mixed together
by a card to obtain a web B for the inner layer B. The web B was enveloped by the
web A and the combined webs were packed at a thickness of 10 cm in a mold of a square
plate shape. The combined webs A and B were heat-treated in the mold at 200°C for
15 minutes to obtain a square plate-shaped cushioning structure having a double layer
structure. This procedure was repeated wherein the thickness and basis weight of the
outer layer A were changed as shown in Table II-2, Run No. 13 to 15. The results are
shown in Table II-2, Run No. 13 to 15.
Example 8
[0052] The procedure of Example 7, Run No. 13 for the production of a cushioning structure
having a double layer structure was repeated wherein a poly-1,4-dimethylcyclohexane
terephthalate fiber having a thickness of 25 deniers and a staple length of 76 mm
and having characteristics shown in Table II-1, Run No. 12 was used as the matrix
fiber for the inner layer B with all other conditions remaining the same. The results
are shown in Table II-2, Run No. 16.
Table I-1
Run No. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Fibers |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Matrix fiber |
Aramid |
Aramid |
Aramid |
Aramid |
Aramid |
Thickness (denier) |
13 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
No. of crimps (CN) (No./inch) |
6 |
8 |
14 |
8 |
8 |
Percentage crimp (CD) (%) |
16 |
20 |
30 |
20 |
20 |
Initial bulkiness (cm³/gr) |
45 |
60 |
85 |
60 |
60 |
Bulkiness under load (cm³/gr) |
17 |
25 |
40 |
25 |
25 |
(b) Flame-retardant fiber |
Lastan |
Lastan |
Lastan |
Lastan |
Lastan |
Residual wt. at glowing test (%) |
48 |
48 |
48 |
48 |
48 |
Ratio of (a)/(b) |
1/0.2 |
1/0.2 |
1/0.2 |
1/0.3 |
1/0.7 |
(c) Elastomer fiber |
SC-comp |
SC-comp |
SC-comp |
SC-comp |
SC-comp |
Melting point (°C) |
155 |
155 |
155 |
155 |
155 |
Ratio of (c)/[(a)+(b)+(c)] (%) |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
Heat-treating temperature |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
Cushioning structure |
|
|
|
|
|
Density (gr/cm³) |
0.050 |
0.052 |
0.052 |
0.052 |
0.052 |
Rebound (%) |
55 |
62 |
67 |
60 |
56 |
Residual strain at 50% compression (%) |
16.2 |
15.5 |
14.3 |
15.8 |
16.4 |
Residual starin after repeat of compression 800,000 times (%) |
8.9 |
7.6 |
6.1 |
8.0 |
9.2 |
Air permeability (cc/cm²·sec) |
120 |
122 |
120 |
105 |
98 |
FAA test |
|
|
|
|
|
Weight reduction (%) |
6.5 |
6.3 |
6.2 |
5.8 |
5.1 |
Burned distance, bottom (cm) |
22 |
22 |
21 |
20 |
16 |
Burned distance, back (cm) |
39 |
40 |
38 |
35 |
38 |
Note Matrix fiber "Aramid": Meta-aramid fiber
Elastomer fiber "SC comp.": Sheath-core composite fiber composed of polybutylene terephthalate
core and block co-polypolyether-polyester elastomer sheath. |
Table I-2
Run No. |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Fibers |
|
|
|
|
(a) Matrix fiber |
Aramid |
Aramid |
Aramid |
Aramid |
Thickness (denier) |
13 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
No. of crimps (CN) (No./inch) |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
Percentage crimp (CD) (%) |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Initial bulkiness (cm³/gr) |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
Bulkiness under load (cm³/gr) |
25 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
(b) Flame-retardant fiber |
Lastan |
Lastan |
kynol |
Basofil |
Residual wt. at glowing test (%) |
48 |
48 |
39 |
28 |
Ratio of (a)/(b) |
1/0.2 |
1/0.2 |
1/0.2 |
1/0.2 |
(c) Elastomer fiber |
SC-comp |
SC-comp |
SC-comp |
SC-comp |
Melting point (°C) |
155 |
155 |
155 |
155 |
Ratio of (c)/[(a)+(b)+(c)](%) |
15 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
Heat-treating temperature |
200 |
210 |
200 |
200 |
Cushioning structure |
|
|
|
|
Density (gr/cm³) |
0.051 |
0.053 |
0.052 |
0.051 |
Rebound (%) |
56 |
65 |
64 |
63 |
Residual strain at 50% compression (%) |
18.0 |
16.2 |
14.9 |
14.6 |
Residual starin after repeat of compression 800,000 times (%) |
9.1 |
8.3 |
7.3 |
7.5 |
Air permeability (cc/cm²·sec) |
110 |
125 |
122 |
118 |
FAA test |
|
|
|
|
Weight reduction (%) |
5.8 |
6.4 |
8.5 |
15.6 |
Burned distance, bottom (cm) |
22 |
22 |
36 |
46 |
Burned distance, back (cm) |
38 |
40 |
42 |
48 |
Note Matrix fiber "Aramid": Meta-aramid fiber
Elastomer fiber "SC comp.": Sheath-ore composite fiber composed of polybutylene terephthalate
core and block co-polypolyether-polyester elastomer sheath |
Table II-1
Run No. |
10 |
11 |
12 |
Fibers |
|
|
|
(a) Matrix fiber |
PET |
PET |
PCT |
Thickness (denier) |
14 |
13 |
25 |
No. of crimps (CN) (No./inch) |
12 |
9 |
9 |
Percentage crimp (CD) (%) |
32 |
25 |
26 |
Initial bulkiness (cm³/gr) |
73 |
70 |
60 |
Bulkiness under load (cm³/gr) |
35 |
21 |
30 |
(b) Flame-retardant fiber |
Lastan |
Lastan |
Lastan |
Residual wt. at glowing test (%) |
48 |
48 |
48 |
Ratio of (a)/(b) |
1/0.6 |
1/0.4 |
1/0.6 |
(c) Elastomer fiber |
SC-comp |
SC-comp |
SC-comp |
Melting point (°C) |
155 |
155 |
155 |
Ratio of (c)/[(a)+(b)+(c)] (%) |
30 |
30 |
30 |
Heat-treating temperature |
200 |
200 |
200 |
Cushioning structure |
|
|
|
Density (gr/cm³) |
0.052 |
0.053 |
0.050 |
Rebound (%) |
68 |
66 |
72 |
Residual strain at 50% compression (%) |
14.2 |
14.7 |
13.6 |
Residual starin after repeat of compression 800,000 times (%) |
5.6 |
6.2 |
5.1 |
Air permeability (cc/cm²·sec) |
113 |
112 |
115 |
FAA test |
|
|
|
Weight reduction (%) |
8.5 |
7.0 |
8.2 |
Burned distance, bottom (cm) |
30 |
21 |
28 |
Burned distance, back (cm) |
43 |
39 |
40 |
Note Matrix fiber "PET": Polyethylene terephthalate fiber
"PCT": Poly-1,4-dimethylcyclohexane terephthalate fiber
Elastomer fiber "SC comp.": Sheath-core composite fiber composed of polybutylene terephthalate
core and block co-polypolyether-polyester elastomer sheath |
Table II-2
Run No. |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
Fibers |
|
|
|
|
(a) Matrix fiber |
Aramid |
Aramid |
Aramid |
Aramid |
Thickness (denier) |
13 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
No. of crimps (CN) (No./inch) |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
Percentage crimp (CD) (%) |
17 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
Initial bulkiness (cm³/gr) |
55 |
55 |
55 |
55 |
Bulkiness under load (cm³/gr) |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
(b) Flame-retardant fiber |
Lastan |
Lastan |
Lastan |
Lastan |
Residual wt. at glowing test (%) |
48 |
48 |
48 |
48 |
Ratio of (a)/(b) |
1/0.9 |
1/0.9 |
1/0.9 |
1/0.9 |
(c) Elastomer fiber |
SC-comp |
SC-comp |
SC-comp |
SC-comp |
Melting point (°C) |
155 |
155 |
155 |
155 |
Ratio of (c)/[(a)+(b)+(c)] (%) |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Heat-treating temperature |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
Outer layer, thickness (mm) |
4 |
8 |
4 |
4 |
basis weight (g/m²) |
300 |
300 |
450 |
300 |
Cushioning structure |
|
|
|
|
Density (gr/cm³) |
0.045 |
0.046 |
0.047 |
0.049 |
Rebound (%) |
59 |
58 |
58 |
63 |
Residual strain at 50% compression (%) |
15.3 |
15.4 |
15.5 |
14.8 |
Residual starin after repeat of compression 800,000 times (%) |
7.8 |
8.0 |
8.2 |
6.0 |
Air permeability (cc/cm²·sec) |
110 |
105 |
90 |
108 |
FAA test |
|
|
|
|
Weight reduction (%) |
4.5 |
4.0 |
3.8 |
4.2 |
Burned distance, bottom (cm) |
11 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
Burned distance, back (cm) |
41 |
38 |
35 |
40 |
Note Matrix fiber "Aramid": Meta-aramid fiber
Elastomer fiber "SC comp.": Sheath-core composite fiber composed of PET core and block
co-polypolyether-polyester elastomer sheath |
Industrial Applicability
[0053] The cushioning structure of the present invention can be made without the use of
an injurious material such as freon, and has a good air permeability and thus is not
stuffy. The cushioning structure exhibits cushioning characteristics such that the
initial density upon compression is not too high, the rebound is large. The rebound
increases approximately in direct proportion to the degree of compression and the
cushioning structure is not bottomed out. With regard to waste disposal, which has
become the object of public attention, the cushioning structure can be incinerated
without generation of harmful gas, which is in contrast to a conventional cushioning
structure made of polyurethane. As compared with the cushioning structure made of
flame-retardant polyurethane which is recently used for seats of airplanes, the cushioning
structure of the present invention has benefits not only in the above-mentioned cushioning
characteristics and the ease in incineration, but also in meeting with the demand
of lightweight which is recently requested. This is in contrast to the flame-retardant
polyurethane which has a great problem such that it must be densified to at least
0.060 g/cm². Thus, the cushioning structure of the present invention is very useful
for seats of various vehicles.
[0054] Recently a cushioning structure has been proposed which is composed of a fiber web
made of a polyester fiber and in which at least part of the intersecting points of
fibers are fusion-bonded by a binder fiber such as an elastomer fiber. This cushioning
structure exhibits good cushion characteristics, but has a problem in flame-retardancy.
In contrast, the cushioning structure of the present invention has good and balanced
cushion characteristics and flame-retardancy and is comfortable.
[0055] The cushioning structure of the present invention is beneficial also in that a uniform
cushioning structure can be made by a short and simple process wherein a bulky web
of staple fibers is heat-treated.
[0056] The cushioning structure of the present invention has good flame retardancy, cushioning
properties, durability, form stability, air permeability (i.e., reduced stuffiness),
uniformity in processing and a wide processability.
[0057] Therefore, the cushioning structure is useful for general furniture and beds and
especially useful for furniture and beds in hospitals and facilities for old people,
vehicle seats such as seats of subway, ships, super-express trains, airplanes and
racing cars. It is also used as other flame-retardant paddings and for miscellaneous
goods.
[0058] Especially the cushioning structure of the present invention is useful as cushion
materials for which good cushioning characteristics and a high flame retardancy are
required. The high flame retardancy is, for example, that satisfying the requirement
for airplanes according to FAA combustion test wherein a cushion structure is placed
in contact with a flame for 2 minutes by using a burner producing a flame at 1,038°C
which is placed at a distance of 102 mm from the cushioning structure.
1. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure comprising (a) a matrix
composed of a bulky non-woven web of a crimped non-elastic staple fiber, (b) a crimped
flame-retardant staple fiber exhibiting a residual weight of at least 35% as tested
by a non-flaming heating test method, and (c) a thermoplastic elastic fiber; the crimped
flame-retardant staple fiber (b) and the thermoplastic elastic fiber (c) being dispersed
in the matrix (a) and at least part of intersecting points of the thermoplastic elastic
fiber (c) with the other fibers (a) and (b) are fusion-bonded.
2. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure as claimed in claim 1, wherein
the crimped flame-retardant staple fiber (b) is at least one fiber selected from the
group consisting of a pre-oxidized acrylonitrile polymer fiber, a carbon fiber, a
crosslinked phenolic resin fiber and polybenzimidazole fiber.
3. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure as claimed in claim 1 or
2, wherein the crimped flame-retardant staple fiber (b) has a single-fiber thickness
of not larger than 8 deniers.
4. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure as claimed in any preceding
claim, wherein the crimped flame-retardant staple fiber (b) has a single-fiber thickness
smaller than that of the thermoplastic elastic fiber (c).
5. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure as claimed in any preceding
claim, wherein the ratio of the amount of the crimped flame-retardant staple fiber
(b) to the amount of the crimped non-elastic staple fiber (a) is in the range of 0.1/1
to 1/1.
6. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure as claimed in any preceding
claim, wherein the amount of the thermoplastic elastic fiber (c) is 10 to 50% by weight
based on the weight of the cushioning article.
7. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure as claimed in any preceding
claim, wherein the crimped non-elastic staple fiber (a) is selected from the group
consisting of polyester fibers and aramid fibers.
8. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure as claimed in any preceding
claim, wherein the crimped non-elastic staple fiber (a) has a single-fiber thickness
of 4 to 300 deniers, an initial bulkiness of 40 to 120 cm³/g and a bulkiness of 15
to 50 cm³/g under a load of 10 gr/cm³.
9. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure as claimed in any preceding
claim, wherein the peeling strength of the cushioning structure as determined in the
thickness direction is at least 1.0 kg.
10. A vehicle seat molded from a heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure
comprising (a) a matrix composed of a bulky nonwoven web of a crimped non-elastic
staple fiber, (b) a crimped flame-retardant staple fiber exhibiting a residual weight
of at least 35% as tested by a non-flaming heating test method, and (c) a thermoplastic
elastic fiber; the crimped flame-retardant staple fiber (b) and the thermoplastic
elastic fiber (c) being dispersed in the matrix (a) and at least part of intersecting
points of the thermoplastic elastic fiber (c) with the other fibers (a) and (b) are
fusion-bonded.
11. A vehicle seat as claimed in claim 10, wherein the crimped flame-retardant staple
fiber (b) is at least one crimped staple fiber selected from the group consisting
of a pre-oxidized acrylonitrile polymer fiber, a carbon fiber, a crosslinked phenolic
resin fiber and polybenzimidazole fiber.
12. A vehicle seat as claimed in claim 10 or 11, wherein the crimped flame-retardant staple
fiber (b) has a single-fiber thickness of not larger than 8 deniers.
13. A vehicle seat as claimed in any of claims 10 to 12, wherein the crimped flame-retardant
staple fiber (b) has a single-fiber thickness smaller than that of the thermoplastic
elastic fiber (c).
14. A vehicle seat as claimed in claim 12 or 13, wherein the ratio of the amount of the
crimped flame-retardant staple fiber (b) to the amount of the crimped non-elastic
staple fiber (a) is in the range of 0.1/1 to 1/1.
15. A vehicle seat as claimed in any of claims 10 to 14, wherein the amount of the thermoplastic
elastic fiber (c) is 10 to 50% by weight based on the weight of the cushioning structure.
16. A vehicle seat as claimed in any of claims 10 to 15, wherein the crimped non-elastic
staple fiber (a) is selected from the group consisting of polyester fibers and aramid
fibers.
17. A vehicle seat as claimed in any of claims 10 to 16, wherein the crimped non-elastic
staple fiber (a) has a single-fiber thickness of 4 to 300 deniers, an initial bulkiness
of 40 to 120 cm³/g and a bulkiness of 15 to 50 cm³/g under a load of 10 gr/cm².
18. A vehicle seat as claimed in any of claims 10 to 17, which is an airplane seat.
19. A vehicle seat as claimed in any of claims 10 to 17, which is a racing-car seat.
20. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure having a double-layer structure
composed of an inner layer of a bulky nonwoven web and an outer layer enveloping the
inner layer; said outer layer comprising (a) a matrix composed of a bulky nonwoven
web of a crimped non-elastic staple fiber, (b) a crimped flame-retardant staple fiber
exhibiting a residual weight of at least 35% as tested by a non-flaming heating test
method, and (c) a thermoplastic elastic fiber; the crimped flame-retardant staple
fiber (b) and the thermoplastic elastic fiber (c) being dispersed in the matrix (a)
and at least part of intersecting points of the thermoplastic elastic fiber (c) with
the other fibers (a) and (b) are fusion-bonded.
21. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure as claimed in claim 20,
wherein the crimped flame-retardant staple fiber (b) in the outer layer is at least
one staple fiber selected from the group consisting of a pre-oxidized acrylonitrile
polymer fiber, a carbon fiber, a crosslinked phenolic resin fiber and polybenzimidazole
fiber.
22. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure as claimed in claim 20 or
21, wherein the crimped flame-retardant staple fiber (b) in the outer layer has a
single-fiber thickness of not larger than 8 deniers.
23. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure as claimed in any of claims
20 to 22, wherein the ratio of the amount of the crimped flame-retardant staple fiber
(b) to the amount of the crimped non-elastic staple fiber (a) in the outer layer is
in the range of 0.1/1 to 1/1.
24. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure as claimed in any of claims
20 to 23, wherein the amount of the thermoplastic elastic fiber (c) is 10 to 50% by
weight based on the weight of the outer layer.
25. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure as claimed in any of claims
20 to 24, wherein the crimped non-elastic staple fiber (a) in the outer layer is selected
from the group consisting of polyester fibers and aramid fibers.
26. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure as claimed in any of claims
20 to 25, wherein the outer layer has a thickness of 3 to 10 mm and a basis weight
of 200 to 500 g/m².
27. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure as claimed in any of claims
20 to 26, wherein the bulky nonwoven web of the inner layer is composed of a crimped
polyester staple fiber or a fibrous mixture predominantly comprising a crimped polyester
staple fiber.
28. A heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure as claimed in any of claims
20 to 27, wherein a thermoplastic elastic fiber is dispersed not only in the outer
layer but also in the bulky nonwoven web of the inner layer, and the inner layer is
bonded to the outer layer.
29. A vehicle seat molded from a heat-resistant and flame-retardant cushioning structure
having a double-layer structure composed of an inner layer of a bulky nonwoven web
and an outer layer enveloping the inner layer; said outer layer comprising (a) a matrix
composed of a bulky nonwoven web of a crimped non-elastic staple fiber, (b) a crimped
flame-retardant staple fiber exhibiting a residual weight of at least 35% as tested
by a non-flaming heating test method, and (c) a thermoplastic elastic fiber; the crimped
flame-retardant staple fiber (b) and the thermoplastic elastic fiber (c) being dispersed
in the matrix (a) and at least part of intersecting points of the thermoplastic elastic
fiber (c) with the other fibers (a) and (b) are fusion-bonded.
30. A vehicle seat as claimed in claim 29, wherein the crimped flame-retardant staple
fiber (b) in the outer layer is at least one staple fiber selected from the group
consisting of a pre-oxidized acrylonitrile polymer fiber, a carbon fiber, a crosslinked
phenolic resin fiber and polybenzimidazole fiber.
31. A vehicle seat as claimed in claim 29 or 30, wherein the flame-retardant staple fiber
(b) in the outer layer has a single-fiber thickness of not larger than 8 deniers.
32. A vehicle seat as claimed in any of claims 29 to 31, wherein the ratio of the amount
of the crimped flame-retardant staple fiber (b) to the amount of the crimped non-elastic
staple fiber (a) in the outer layer is in the range of 0.1/1 to 1/1.
33. A vehicle seat as claimed in any of claims 29 to 32, wherein the amount of the thermoplastic
elastic fiber (c) is 10 to 50% by weight based on the weight of the outer layer.
34. A vehicle seat as claimed in any of claims 29 to 33, wherein the crimped non-elastic
staple fiber (a) in the outer layer is selected from the group consisting of polyester
fibers and aramid fibers.
35. A vehicle seat as claimed in any of claims 29 to 34, wherein the outer layer has a
thickness of 3 to 10 mm and a basis weight of 200 to 500 g/m².
36. A vehicle seat as claimed in any of claims 29 to 35, wherein the bulky nonwoven web
of the inner layer is composed of a crimped polyester staple fiber or a fibrous mixture
predominantly comprising a crimped polyester staple fiber.
37. A vehicle seat as claimed in any of claims 29 to 36, wherein a thermoplastic elastic
fiber is dispersed not only in the outer layer but also in the bulky nonwoven web
of the inner layer, and the inner layer is bonded to the outer layer.
38. A vehicle seat as claimed in any of claims 29 to 37, which is an airplane seat.
39. A vehicle seat as claimed in any of claims 29 to 37, which is a racing-car seat.