[0001] This invention relates to novel vaccine and pharmaceutical formulations and to their
manufacture and use in the treatment of AIDS. In particular the invention relates
to the use of gp160 or derivative thereof, including novel forms of gp 160 in a vaccine,
adjuvanted with 3-D Monophosphoryl lipid A.
[0002] Retroviruses, that is, viruses within the family, Retroviridae, are a large family
of enveloped, icosohedral viruses of about 150 nm having a coiled nucleocapsid within
the core structure and having RNA as the genetic material. The family comprises the
oncoviruses such as the sarcoma and leukemia viruses, certain immunodeficiency viruses
and the lentiviruses.
[0003] Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is the etiological agent of acquired
immune deficiency syndrome, also known as AIDS. This retrovirus has a complex genetic
organisation, including the long terminal repeats (LTRs), the
gag,
pol, and
env genes, and other genes. This retrovirus carries a number of viral antigens which
are potential candidates either alone or in concert as vaccinal agents capable of
inducing a protective immune response.
[0004] The HIV-1 envelope protein is synthesized as a polyprotein precursor which is subsequently
glycosylated within infected cells to give a glycoprotein with a mol. weight of 160
kDa (gp160), which is processed by proteolysis into a gp120 external glycoprotein
and gp41 transmembrane protein.
[0005] A DNA coding region for proviral HIV can be prepared from any of the several immunodeficiency
virus genomic clones reported in the literature. See, for example, Shaw et al.,
Science 226:1165(1984); Kramer et al.,
Science 231:1580(1986). Alternatively, an immunodeficiency virus genomic clone can be prepared
from virus isolated from clinical specimens by standard DNA cloning techniques. See,
for example, Gallo et al., U.S. Patent 4,520,113; Montagnier et al., U.S. Patent 4,708,818.
[0006] The proviral DNA sequence of HIV-BH1O-2 is described by Ratner
et al., "Human Retroviruses and AIDS" 1989, HIV Sequence Database ed. Gerald Meyers, Los
Alamos National Laboratory. The sequence is 8932 bp long, the
env gene being located at 5580-8150 and the cleavage sites therein at 7088 and 7112 corresponding
to amino acids 503 and 511 (cleavage after these residues) (numbering according to
Los Alamos database).
[0007] According to the present invention, there is provided HIV gp160 which has been modified
to provide amino acids other than lysine or arginine at positions 502 and 510 independently.
[0008] Suitable replacements for lysine are those similar to lysine in hydrophilicity and
size, such as histidine, threonine, serine, asparagine, aspartic acid, glutamine and
glutamic acid. Of these, the preferred amino acid is glutamic acid. The preferred
protein is both uncleavable due to the mutations introduced and also able of eliciting
cross neutralising antibody, which is dependent on the correct folding of the protein.
[0009] More preferably the invention provides the modified protein of the invention, in
oligomeric form. In particular with a relative molecular weight 640 kDa. Based on
the molecular weight of gp160 monomer, this form is believed to be tetrameric. This
is advantageous since viral surface proteins naturally exist as oligomers which
in-vivo form spikes which protude from the viral surface. As many neutralising epitopes are
conformational, it is clearly important to mimic as closely as possible the form of
the antigen as it appears naturally, since this will provide the most relevant immune
response.
[0010] In a preferred enbodiment the invention provides the modified protein of the invention,
in an oligomeric and substantially pure form.
[0011] By substantially pure form is meant at least 75% pure, more preferably 90% pure,
more preferably 99% pure.
[0012] In a further aspect the invention provides a process for preparing modified HIV gp160
according to the invention which process comprises expressing DNA encoding said modified
protein in a recombinant eukaryotic host cell and recovering the modified protein
product.
[0013] The DNA polymer comprising a nucleotide sequence that encodes the modified protein
also forms part of the invention.
[0014] The recombinant DNA molecule of the invention may be prepared in accordance with
the invention by the condensation of appropriate mono-, di- or oligomeric nucleotide
units.
[0015] The preparation may be carried out chemically, enzymatically, or by a combination
of the two methods,
in vitro or
in vivo as appropriate. Thus, the DNA molecule may be prepared by the enzymatic ligation
of appropriate DNA fragments, by conventional methods such as those described by D.
M. Roberts
et al in Biochemistry 1985,
24, 5090-5098.
[0016] The DNA fragments may be obtained by digestion of DNA containing the required sequences
of nucleotides with appropriate restriction enzymes, by chemical synthesis, by enzymatic
polymerisation, or by a combination of these methods.
[0017] Digestion with restriction enzymes may be performed in an appropriate buffer at a
temperature of 20
o-70
oC, generally in a volume of 50µl or less with 0.1-10µg DNA.
[0018] Enzymatic polymerisation of DNA may be carried out
in vitro using a DNA polymerase such as DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment) in an appropriate
buffer containing the nucleoside triphosphates dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP as required
at a temperature of 10
o-37
oC, generally in a volume of 50µl or less. Fragments can be polymerised and amplified
by polymerase chain reaction using Taq polymerase (ref. PCR Protocols 1989 - a guide
to Methods and Applications, Ed. M.A. Innis
et al., Acadamic Press).
[0019] Enzymatic ligation of DNA fragments may be carried out using a DNA ligase such as
T4 DNA ligase in an appropriate buffer at a temperature of 4
oC to ambient, generally in a volume of 50µl or less.
[0020] The chemical synthesis of the DNA molecule or fragments may be carried out by conventional
phosphotriester, phosphite or phosphoramidite chemistry, using solid phase techniques
such as those described in 'Chemical and Enzymatic Synthesis of Gene Fragments - A
Laboratory Manual' (ed. H.G. Gassen and A. Lang), Verlag Chemie, Weinheim (1982),or
in other scientific publications, for example M.J. Gait, H.W.D. Matthes, M. Singh,
B.S. Sproat, and R.C. Titmas, Nucleic Acids Research, 1982,
10, 6243; B.S. Sproat and W. Bannwarth, Tetrahedron Letters, 1983,
24, 5771; M.D. Matteucci and M.H Caruthers, Tetrahedron Letters, 1980,
21, 719; M.D. Matteucci and M.H. Caruthers, Journal of the American Chemical Society,
1981,
103, 3185; S.P. Adams
et al., Journal of the American Chemical Society,1983,
105, 661; N.D. Sinha, J. Biernat, J. McMannus, and H. Koester, Nucleic Acids Research,
1984,
12, 4539; and H.W.D. Matthes
et al., EMBO Journal, 1984,
3, 801. Preferably an automated DNA synthesizer is employed.
[0021] DNA polymer which encodes the modified protein may be prepared by site directed mutagenesis
of the cDNA which codes for unmodified protein, by conventional methods such as those
described by G. Winter
et al in Nature 1982,
299, 756-758 or by Zoller and Smith 1982; Nucl. Acids Res.,
10, 6487-6500.
[0022] The invention also extends to a vector comprising the recombinant DNA molecule of
the invention and to a recombinant vaccina virus containing said vector.
[0023] The vector may be prepared in accordance with the invention by cleaving a vector
to provide a linear DNA segment having a intact replicon, and ligating said linear
segment and one or more DNA molecules which, together with said linear segment complete
the recombinant DNA molecule of the invention.
[0024] The recombinant host cell of the invention may be prepared by transforming a vaccina
virus with a vector of the invention.
[0025] The modified protein product is isolated from conditioned medium by standard techniques
of protein isolation and purification. Detergents e.g., Decyl PEG-300, DO Decyl PEG
Triton X100. Thesit Deoxycholate, can be added in order to effect cell lysis and free
the modified protein from cell membrane material. Of these Decyl PEG-300 and Thesit
Deoxycholate are preferred, DO Decyl PEG Triton X100 Modified protein can then be
purified by a series of ultrafiltration steps, ultracentrifugation steps, selective
precipitations with e.g., ammonium sulfate or PEG, density gradient centrifugation
in CsC1 or sucrose or metrizamide gradients and/or chromatographic steps, such as
affinity chromatography, immunoaffinity chromatography preferred, HPLC, reversed phase
HPLC, cation and anion exchange, size exclusion chromatography and preparative isoelectric
focusing. Purification utilising immunoaffinity chromatography is preferred. During
or following purification, the modified protein can be treated with, e.g., formaldehyde,
glutaraldehyde or NAE to enhance stability or immunogenicity.
[0026] For preparation of the oligomeric form of the invention it is preferred to use mild
conditions during the purification steps. In particular, reducing agent should be
avoided, and non ionic detergents such as Decyl PEG-300 (polyethyleneglycol 300 monodecylether)
are preferred to ionic detergents for cell lysis and solubilisation during the chromatographic
steps. A preferred affinity chromatography medium is Lentil lectin Sepharose and a
preferred immunoaffinity chromatography medium is an anti-gp160 monoclonal antibody
such as 178.1 (WO 90/06358) coupled on a suitable carrier such as glutaraldehyde-activated
Trisacryl (IBF).
[0027] The modified protein may be adsorbed from the monoclonal antibody in the presence
of the detergent octyl glucopyranoside which can be removed by dialysis. The detergents
are preferably used at concentrations above their theoretical critical micelle concentration.
[0028] The modified protein produced in accordance with this invention is useful as a diagnostic
agent for detection of exposure to HIV. The modified protein is also useful in vaccines
for the prevention of infection or for the inhibition or prevention of disease progression.
[0029] This invention also relates to a vaccine and pharmaceutical compositions containing
the modified protein of this invention. Such compositions will contain an immunoprotective
quantity of the modified protein of this invention and maybe prepared by conventional
techniques.
[0030] In the vaccine of the invention, an aqueous solution of the protein can be used directly.
Alternatively, the protein, with or without prior lyophilization, can be mixed or
absorbed with any of the various known adjuvants. Such adjuvants include, but are
not limited to, aluminium hydroxide, muramyl dipeptide and saponins such as Quil A,
3D-MPL (3Deacylated monophosphoryl lipid A), or TDM. As a further exemplary alternative,
the protein can be encapsulated within microparticles such as liposomes. In yet another
exemplary alternative, the protein can be conjugated to an immuostimulating macromolecule,
such as killed
Bordetella or a tetanus toxoid.
[0031] Vaccine preparation is generally described in New Trends and Developments in Vaccines,
edited by Voller et al., University Park Press, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A. 1978.
Encapsulation within liposomes is described, for example, by Fullerton, U.S. Patent
4,235,877. Conjugation of proteins to macromolecules is disclosed, for example, by
Likhite, U.S. Patent 4,372,945 and by Armor et al., U.S. Patent 4,474,757.
[0032] The amount of the modified protein of the present invention in each vaccine dose
is selected as an amount which induces an immunoprotective response without significant,
adverse side effects in typical vaccines. Such amount will vary depending upon which
specific immunogen is employed and whether or not the vaccine is adjuvanted. Generally,
it is expected that each dose will comprise 1-1000 µg of modified protein, preferably
10-200 µg. An optimal amount for a particular vaccine can be ascertained by standard
studies involving observation of antibody titres and other responses in subjects.
Following an initial vaccination, subjects will preferably receive a boost in about
4 weeks, followed by repeated boosts every six months for as long as a risk of infection
exists.
[0033] The invention further provides modified protein of the invention for use in vaccinating
a host and use of modified protein of the invention in the preparation of a vaccine.
[0034] In addition to vaccination of persons susceptible to HIV infections, the pharmaceutical
compositions of the present invention may be used to treat, immunotherapeutically,
patients suffering from HIV infections.
[0035] Accordingly, in one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of
treating a human susceptible to or suffering from an HIV infection by administering
an effective amount of the modified gp160 as herein described.
[0036] Coincidental with the concept of utilising sub unit components produced, for example,
by means of recombinant DNA technology, comes the need for adjuvants and/or carriers
to present immunogens effectively to the host immune system such that both arms of
the immune response (neutralising antibody and effector cell mediated immunity (DTH))
are produced. In the context of the present invention, (ie in the prophylactic or
therapeutic treatment of HIV infections) we have discovered than an immunostimulating
moiety, 3D MPL is able to stimulate both arms of the immunesystem.
[0037] Accordingly in a preferred aspect of the present invention there is provided a pharmaceutical
formulation comprising gp 160 or an immunological derivative thereof and 3D Monophosphoryl
lipid A (3D-MPL) with a suitable carrier.
[0038] In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the gp 160 or an immunological
derivative thereof and 3D- MPL are presented in an oil in water emulsion. This system
provides enhanced neutralising activity.
[0039] Accordingly in a preferred aspect of the present invention there is provided a pharmaceutical
or vaccine formulation comprising gp 160 or an immunological derivative thereof,3D-MPL
in an oil in water carrier, said carrier comprising an emulsion of a tetrapolyol and
a non toxic mineral oil in a buffered saline solution.
[0040] Preferably the carrier comprises a Pluronic polyol such as Pluronic L121, and squalane
or squalene or other metabolisable oils An emulsifer such as Tween 80 or Tween 28
is preferably provided to stabilise the emulsion.
[0041] The carrier preferably contains only submicron particles of between 100 and 400 nm.
[0042] The concentration of antigen in the final formulation is preferably between 10µg
to 150µg/ml, more preferably between 20 µg to 100µg/ml.
[0043] The concentration range of adjuvant, 3D-MPL, in the vaccine, is preferably between
10µg to 100µg/ml more preferably between 25 to 50µg/ml.
[0044] The present invention further provides the vaccine formulations as herein described
for use in medicine, in particular for use in the treatment by immonotherapy and prophylatic
treatment of HIV-1 infections such as AIDS or AIDS related complex (ARC).
[0045] In a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of producing
a vaccine comprising gp160 or an immunological derivative thereof, 3D monophosphoryl
lipid A with a suitable carrier, the method comprising mixing gp160 or immunological
derivative with said carrier and with 3D monophosphoryl lipid A.
[0046] In an embodiment, there is provided a method of producing a vaccine as herein described
in an oil in water carrier wherein an oil in water emulsion is microfluidized to provide
sub micron particles in said emulsion and mixed with gp160 or immunological derivative
thereof and 3D MPL.
[0047] Typically the 3D-MPL is premixed with the emulsion, thereafter the antigen is mixed
into the resulting composition.
[0048] 3D-MPL may be obtained by the methods disclosed in British Patent 2211502.
[0049] Suitable carriers in this context, comprise oil in water emulsions. The formulations
of the present invention provide enhanced neutralising titres when compared with conventional
vaccine formulations comprising, alum alone as the adjuvant (the only adjuvant licensed
for human use).
[0050] The term immunological derivatives is used herein to include immunogenic fragments
of gp 160 which when adjuvanted with 3D Monophosphoryl lipid A are capable of raising
neutralising antibodies against HIV-1. As such this will include, for example the
HIV-1 outer membrane glycoprotein gp 120, modified gp 160 as herein described as well
as the naturally occurring isolated gp 160. Particularly preferred are those derivatives
which are also able to raise a DTH response.
[0051] Thus most preferably the invention provides the modified form of the protein in oligomeric
form which when purified under gentle, non-reducing conditions is shown to have an
apparent molecular weight of between 600-700 KDa 640 Kd and is believed to be a tetramer.
This tetramer may be destabilised by running the protein on SDS gel under non-reducing
conditions, which then provides a dimer of 330 kd and a monomer. The dimer may further
be reduced under standard reducing conditions to yield the monomer.
[0052] All these forms of the gp160 may be used in the formulations of the present invention.
[0053] The production of gp 160 or derivatives thereof may be achieved by methods known
in the art. Typically this will involve the cloning and expression of the gene encoding
for gp 160 in a suitable host. The production of recombinant gp 160 (rgp 160) in such
ways may be achieved using the techniques described in Maniatis
et al; Molecular Cloning - A laboratory Manual; Cold Spring Harbour 1982.
[0054] A variety of eukaryotic cells and expression systems are available for expression
of the recombinant DNA molecules. The most widely used among these are yeast, insect
and mammalian systems, although the invention is not limited to use of these. Such
systems employ a recombinant DNA molecule of the invention, optionally a selection
marker and, in some cases, maintenance functions such as an origin of replication.
[0055] Insect cells which can be used in the invention include
Drosophila cells and Lepidoptera cells. Useful
Drosophila cells include S1, S2, S3, KC-O and
D.
hydei cells. See, for example, Schneider et al.,
J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 27:353 (1972); Schulz et al.,
Proc. Nat1. Acad. Sci USA 83:9428 (1986); Sinclair et al.,
Mol. Cell. Biol.
5:3208 (1985).
[0056] Drosophila cells are transfected by standard techniques, including calcium phosphate precipitation,
cell fusion, electroporation and viral transfection. Cells are cultured in accordance
with standard cell culture procedures in a variety of nutrient media, including, e.g.,
M3 media which consists of balanced salts and essential amino acids. See, Lindquist,
DIS 58:163 (1982).
[0057] Promoters known to he useful in
Drosophila include mammalian cell promoters such as SV40 as well as
Drosophila promoters, the latter being preferred. examples of useful
Drosophila promoters include the
Drosophila metallothionein promoter, the 70 kilodalton heatshock protein promoter (HSP70) and
the COPIA LTR. See, for example, DiNocera et al.,
Proc. Nat1. Acad. Sci. USA 80;7095 (1983); McGarry et al.,
Cell 42:903 (1985).
[0058] Useful Lepidoptera cells include cells from
Trichoplusia ni,
Spodoptera frugiperda,
Heliothis zea,
Autographica californica,
Rachiplusis ou,
Galleria melonella,
Manduca sexta or other cells which can be infected with Baculoviruses, including nuclear polyhedrosis
viruses (NPV), single nucleocapsid viruses (SNPV) and multiple nucleocapsid viruses
(MNPV). The preferred Baculoviruses are NPV or MNPV Baculoviruses because these contain
the polyhedrin gene promoter which is highly expressed in infected cells. Particularly
exemplified hereinbelow is the MNPV virus from
Autographica californica (AcMNPV). However, other MNPV and NPV viruses can also be employed the silkworm virus,
Bombyx mori. Lepidoptera cells are co-transfected with DNA comprising the recombinant DNA molecule
of the invention and with the DNA of an infectious Baculovirus by standard transfection
techniques, as discussed above. Cells are cultured in accordance with standard cells
culture techniques in a variety of nutrient media, including, for example, TC100 (Gibco
Europe; Gardiner et al.,
J. Inverteb. Pathol.
25:363 (1975) supplemented with 10% fetal Calf serum (FCS). See, Miller et al., in Setlow
et al., eds.,
Genetic Engineering: Principles and Methods., Volume 8, New York, Plenum, 1986, pages 277-298.
[0059] Promoters for use in Lepidoptera cells include promoters from a Baculovirus genome.
The promoter of the polyhedrin gene is preferred because the polyhedrin protein is
naturally over expressed relative to other Baculovirus proteins. The polyhedrin gene
promoter from the AcMNPV virus is preferred. See, Summers et al.,
TAES Bull. NR 1555, May 1987; Smith et al., EP-A-127,839; Smith et al.
Proc. Nat1. Acad. Sci. USA 82:8404(1985); and Cochran, EP-A-228,036.
[0060] For expression in mammalian cells, the recombinant DNA molecule is likewise cloned
within a cloning vector and is then used to transfect the mammalian cells. The vector
preferably comprises additional DNA functions for gene amplification, e.g., a DHFR
expression cassette, and may also comprise additional functions for selection and/or
amplification, e.g., a neomycin resistance cassette for G418 selection. Other functions,
such as for transcription enhancement can also be employed. Yet other functions can
be comprised within the vector for stable episomal maintenance, if desired, such as
maintenance functions of Bovine Papilloma Virus. Alternatively and preferably the
cloning vector is a recombinant mammalian virus such as vaccinia virus.
[0061] Vaccinia virus is a particularly useful vector in that recombinants can be readily
constructed by integration of the foreign gene in a nonessential region of the vaccinia
DNA and thus retain infectivity. When properly engineered the proteins are synthesized,
processed, and transported to the membrane of infected cells. Although vaccinia virus
infection leads to cell death, there is little lysis and the majority of cells remain
intact, allowing easy extraction of the required protein from infected cells. A vaccinia
expression system has been developed by Barrett
et al., Aids Research and Human Retroviruses 1989;
5: 159-171.
[0062] Useful mammalian cells include cells from Chinese hamster ovary (CHO), NIH3T3, COS-7,
CV-I, BHK-21, mouse or rat myeloma, HAK, Vero, HeLa, human diploid cells such as MRC-5
and WI38, or chicken lymphoma cell lines, CV-I and BHK-21 being preferred.
[0063] Transfection and cell culture are carried out by standard techniques. Production
in mammalian cells can also be accomplished by expression in transgenic animals.
[0064] Regulatory sequences useful to drive gene expression in mammalian cell lines or mammalian
primary cells include the SV 40 early and late gene promoters, the metallothionein
promoter, viral LTR's such as the Rous sarcoma LTR, the Moloney sarcoma virus (MSV)
LTR or the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) LTR, or the adenovirus major late promoter
and hybrid promoters such as a hybrid BK virus and adenovirus major late promoter.
The control elements region can also comprise downstream functions, such as regions
for polyadenylation, or other functions, such as transcription enhancer sequences.
[0065] Yeasts which can be used in the practice of the invention include those of the genera
Hanensula,
Pichia,
Kluveromyces,
Schizosaccharomyces,
Candida and
Sacchoromyces.
Sacchoromyces cerevisiae is the preferred yeast host. Useful promoters include the copper inducible (CUP1)
promoter, glycolytic gene promoters, e.g., TDH3, PGK and ADH, and the PHO5 and ARG3
promoters. See, e g. Miyanohara et al.,
Proc. Nat1. Acad. Sci. USA 80:1 (1983); Mellor et al.,
Gene 24:1 (1983); Hitzeman et al.,
Science 219:620 (1983); Cabezon et al.,
Proc. Nat1. Acad. Sci. USA 81:6594 (1984).
Example 1
(i) Expression of modified gp160 in CV-I cells
[0066] The HIV
env gene of the BH10 molecular clone was mutagenized to abolish precursor cleavage.
[0067] For this, the "cleavage sequences" lys ala lys arg and arg glu lys arg present in
these sequences were modified by site directed mutagenesis to lys/arg x glu arg.

The complete mutagenized
env gene (nucleotides 5802-8478) was cloned into the vaccinia plasmid transfer vector
pGS20 [Mackett M.G., Smith L. and Moss B. (1984) J. Virology
49: 857-864] and transferred into infectious vaccinia virus by recombination. Recombinant
vaccinia plaques were screened for
env expression by capture EIA and positive plaques recloned twice on CV-1 cells. The
production of uncleaved gp160 in these cell lines was further verified by RIPA after
metabolic labelling of cells infected with recombinant vaccinia. Cell surface expression
was confirmed by fluorescent labelling of the intact cell surface using anti-gp120
antibodies.
(ii) Purification of Modified gp160 from Anchorage dependent cells.
[0068] The HIV gp160 envelope protein from (i) was purified in a three step protocol: lysis
of the host cells and extraction of the antigen with the aid of a detergent followed
by two affinity chromatography steps. All the purification steps were performed at
4°C.
Step 1: lysis of the CV-1 cells and extraction of the antigen gp160
[0069] After thawing, the cell suspension and microcarrier beads corresponding to 20 l of
culture were centrifuged at 2,200 xg for 15 min and the supernatant was discarded.
The precipitate was resuspended in 1 l of 30 mM tris/HCl buffer pH 8 supplemented
with 150 mM NaCl, 1% polyethyleneglycol 300 monodecylether (Decyl PEG) and 20 mcg/ml
aprotinin. The cells were lysed for 1 hour on ice with occasional shaking by hand
and centrifuged at 11,300 xg for 20 min. After separation of the supernatant, the
pellet was washed with 400 ml of lysis buffer and centrifuged at 11,300 xg for 20
min. The cell debris and microcarrier beads were discarded and the combined supernatants
were used for further purification.
Step 2: Affinity chromatography on Lentil lectin Sepharose 4B
[0070] The lysate was chromatographed on a Lentil lectin Sepharose 4B (Pharmacia-LKB) column
(2.5 cm x 20 cm) equilibrated with 30 mM Tris/HCl buffer pH 8 supplemented with 150
mM NaCl and 0.1% Decyl PEG. After loading the lysate at a flow rate of 1 ml/min, the
column was washed with 30 mM Tris/HCl buffer pH 8 supplemented with 1 M NaCl and 0.1%
Decyl PEG. Subsequently, the antigen was eluted from the column with 0.5 M methyl
α-D-mannopyranoside in equilibration buffer and gp160 positive fractions were pooled.
The wash and elution steps were carried out at a flow rate of 5.5 ml/min.
Step 3: Immunoaffinity chromatography on 178.1-Trisacryl
[0071] The anti-gp160 monoclonal antibody 178.1 (Patent publication No. WO 90/06358) was
purified from ascites fluid on a Protein G-Sepharose column (Pharmacia-LKB) and subsequently
coupled on glutaraldehyde-activated Trisacryl (IBF) according to the manufacturer's
guidelines. The antibody, which is directed against an epitope on the gp120 moiety
of the antigen (V₃ loop), has been coupled at a density of 1.5 mg/ml gel.
[0072] The resin was packed into a column (2.5 cm x 10 cm) and equilibrated in 30 mM Tris/HC1
buffer pH 8 supplemented with 150 mM NaCl and 0.1% Decyl PEG.
[0073] The Lentil lectin Sepharose 4B eluate was loaded onto the column by overnight recycling
at 1 ml/min. Subsequently the column was washed at a flow rate of 3.3 ml/min with
20 column volumes of 30 mM Tris/HC1 buffer pH 8 supplemented with 1 M NaCl and 1%
n.octyl β-D-glucopyranoside (OGP). Finally, the antigen was eluted at the same flow
rate with 0.1 M citric acid buffer pH 3.3 supplemented with 1% OGP. Elution fractions
were immediately neutralized with 1 M Tris/HC1 pH 8.8 and the antigen positive fractions
were pooled.
(iii) Protein determination
[0074] Protein concentrations were determined by the method of Bradford (Bradford, 1976)
using bovine serum albumin as the standard.
(iv) Antigen determination
[0075] The amount of gp160 antigen was measured by an in-house developed sandwich ELISA
using sheep anti-gp41 as capturing monoclonal antibody and murine anti-gp120 as indicator
monoclonal antibody. Further detection was with a classical biotinylated anti-mouse
antibody, streptavidin and peroxidase system.
(v) Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blotting
[0076] SDS-slab gel electrophoresis was carried out in 10% polyacrylamide gels according
to the method of Laemmli (Laemmli, 1970). After migration, proteins were visualized
by silver staining after periodic acid oxidation (Pas staining) (Dubray
et al, 1982).
[0077] Electrophoretic runs were carried out in the presence and in the absence of a reducing
agent. Protein bands were further identified by Western blotting on nitrocellulose
according to Towbin (Towbin
et al, 1979) and probing was with antibodies either directed against the gp160 antigen
or against host cell (CV-1) or vaccinia proteins.
(vi) Leakage of 178.1 monoclonal antibody
[0078] The presence of monoclonal antibody 178.1 in the purified gp160 antigen was measured
by ELISA. Antibodies were captured by a goat-anti-mouse antibody and detected with
a biotinylated anti-mouse antibody. Further detection was with the streptavidin-peroxidase
system.
(vii) Size exclusion chromatography of pure env gp160
[0079] Purified gp160 was chromatographed on a TSK 4000 SW HPLC column (7.5 mm x 300 mm)
equilibrated in 0.2 M phosphate buffer pH 7 supplemented with 1% OGP. Flow rate was
0.75 ml/min and column fractions were analysed for antigen by ELISA.
(viii) Purity determination
[0080] Purity was estimated after each purification step by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
under reducing conditions. Protein bands were visualized by PAS staining and further
identified by Western blotting.
[0081] The results clearly showed the antigen to be free of detectable contaminating proteins
after chromatogrphy on the immunoaffinity column. However the final product might
be contaminated with trace amounts of monoclonal antibody leaking from the immunoaffinity
column. Therefore, the amount of 178.1 antibody in the pure gp160 was measured by
ELISA and ranged from 0.004% to 0.02% of the total amount of protein present in the
samples.
[0082] The purified antigen was analysed for the presence of oligomeric forms of gp160.
The formation of oligomers could reflect the structure of gp160 in the virus where
the envelope proteins are arranged as spikes at the surface of the virion. The presence
of cysteines in the primary sequence of the antigen allows formation of (homo-)oligomers
linked by disulfide bridges. This was demonstrated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
in the presence and in the absence of β-mercaptoethanol. Without a reducing agent,
the antigen showed protein bands of molecular mass larger than 160,000 Da, even in
the presence of detergent (SDS). In contrast, when the antigen was boiled in the presence
of a reducing agent, a single protein band at 160 kDa was observed. In order to determine
the size of the oligomeric structures, the antigen was analysed by HPLC size exclusion
chromatography. It followed from column calibration with standards of known molecular
mass that most of the gp160 molecules eluted at a retention time corresponding to
a molecular mass of 640,000 Da. Therefore, it was concluded that in the presence of
a detergent but without a reducing agent, most of the HIV gp160 env protein assembled
into tetrameric structures.
(ix) Analysis
[0083] The final product shows an antigen/protein ratio of about 2 which fits the ELISA
content of the lysate (0.8-1.4 mg antigen by ELISA per liter culture).
Example 2
Expression of modified gp160 in BHK-21 and purification of env. gp160 from cells cultured
in suspension
[0084] The HIV gp160 envelope protein expressed in BHK-21 cells by an analogous method to
that described in Example 1(i) with a recombinant vaccinia virus was purified according
to the scheme outlined in Example 1 (ii) except for some minor modifications at the
lysis step.
Step 1: lysis of the BHK-21 cells and extraction of the antigen gp160
[0085] After thawing, the cell suspension (10⁹ cells) was centrifuged for 15 min at 2,200
xg band the supernatant was discarded. The cell pellet was resuspended in 50 ml of
30 mM Tris/HCl buffer pH 8 supplemented with 150 mM NaCl, 1% polyethyleneglycol 300
monodecylether (Decyl PEG) and 20 mcg/ml aprotinin. The cells were lysed for 1 hour
on ice with occasional shaking by hand and centrifuged at 11,300 xg for 15 min. After
separation of the supernatant, the pellet was washed with 20 ml of lysis buffer and
centrifuged at 11,300 xg for 15 min. The pellet was discarded and the combined supernatants
were used for further purification.
Step 2 and 3 and subsequent analysis was carried out as described in Example 1 (ii)-(ix).
Example 3
Preparation of gp160 - 3D-MPL Vaccines formulations
3 (a) rgp160-Aluminium Hydroxide plus 3D-MPL
[0086] Purified rgp160 (100 µg or 20 µg each per dose) from vaccina (example 1) was adsorbed
overnight at 4°C on aluminium hydroxide (alum) corresponding to 0.5 µg equivalents
Al³⁺ in 1 ml of 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM phosphate buffer pH 6.8. After overnight incubation,
the adjuvant preparation was centrifuged and the supernatant removed. An equal volume
of adsorption buffer containing 100 µg 3D-MPL was then added to the alum-bound rgp160.
More than 95% of the rgp160 was found to be adsorbed on aluminium hydroxide.
3 (b) rgp160-3D-MPL oil in water emulsion
[0087] The vehicle was prepared as follows. Pluronic L121 5% (BASF Wyandotte, New Jersey)
(v/v) and 10% squalane (Aldrich) were added to phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing
0.4% (v/v) Tween 80. This mixture was then microfluidized. For microfluidization,
the emulsion was cycled ten times through a microfluidizer (Model M110 Microfluidics
Corp., Newton, Mass.). The resulting emulsion comprised only submicron particles.
One volume of this emulsion was mixed to an equal volume of twice concentrated rgp160
(either 20 µg or 100 µg) and vortexed briefly to ensure complete mixing of the components.
100 µg/ml 3D-MPL was then added to this rgp160 o/w emulsion. The final preparation
consisted of 0.2% Tween 80, 2.5% Pluronic L121, 5% squalane, 100 µg 3D-MPL and rgp160
(100 µg or 20 µg) in a 1 ml injection dose.
Example 4
Immunogenicity in guinea pigs
ELISA and neutralization titers
[0088] Five guinea pigs were immunized with 3 injections of 50 µg modified gp160 (Example
1) in SAF-1 (Syntex adjuvant formulation-1) Byars NE and Allison A.C. (1987) Vaccine
5: 223-227 at monthly interval. The sera were tested 2 weeks and 1 month after secondary
immunization, as well as 2 weeks after tertiary immunization of the guinea pigs. The
results are described in Table 2.
[0089] A capture enzyme immunoassay (EIA) based on a lysate of HIV-1 (IIIB) infected cells
was used to determine the ELISA titer of the antisera after the first and second boost.
The test used is very similar to that published by Moore et al. [Moore J.P. et al.,
1989, AIDS
3:155 (63)].
[0090] The microplate neutralization assay is based on the detection of HIV gag antigen
in indicator cells. Briefly, SupT1 cells (Hecht et al., 1984, Science
226:1445) are used as indicator cells. The viral inoculum consists of cell free supernatant
of a HIV-1 (IIIB) producing lymphoid cell line. The supernatant is centrifuged at
high speed to eliminate cells and cell debris, aliquoted in 1 ml vials and stored
at -80°C until use. The sera to be tested are inactivated at 56°C for 30 min. prior
to testing. Our negative control consists of a pool of sera from preimmune or adjuvant
alone inoculated animals (same species as the sera to be tested). For neutralization,
750 TCID₅₀ are incubated with serial two fold dilutions of the sera for 1 hour at
37°C. SupT1 cells are then added (4.10⁴ cells/well) and incubated 4 days at 37°C.
The cytopathic effect is microscopically monitored, Triton X-100 (1 % final concentration)
is added to each well and the plate is frozen. A sandwich ELISA is used to monitor
the relative amount of viral antigen produced in the cultures. The plates are coated
with an anti p55 monoclonal antibody. The above Triton X-100 treated samples are incubated
in the plate and the presence of gag antigen is visualized by biotinylated HIV-1 +
human IgGs followed by a streptavidin peroxidase step. The percentages of reduction
of HIV-1 antigen production relative to the control are then evaluated for all the
serum dilutions tested. Using a curve fit to the data points by non linear least squares
analysis, the serum dilution (if any) giving a 50% reduction in antigen production
compared to control, is extrapolated.
[0091] Table 2 shows the neutralizing antibody titer after tertiary immunization.
[0092] Neutralization titers observed after the second boost are exceeding those found in
sera from infected humans. More precisely, the neutralizing titer of our antisera
towards the HIV IIIB isolate is on average 4-fold higher than that observed for a
group of 5 seropositive WHO reference sera (McKeating et al., 1989, J. Gen. Virol.
70:3326-3333). Neutralization of a series of HIV-1 isolates (cross neutralization) was
tested by Dr. Weiss' laboratory (Chester Beatty Laboratories, U.K.) using a more stringent
neutralization test that yields a lower sensitivity and titre. The results, described
in
Table 3 were reproduced on 3 occasions with 2 different bleeds and show good cross neutralization
of a variety of HIV-1 strains including an African strain (CBL-4) (see table 3).
[0093] Sera from guinea pigs immunized with vaccinia gp160 (Example 1) (01-05) show good
cross neutralizing titers after
tertiary immunization.
[0094] Because of the strong cross neutralizing response observed after 3 doses, vaccinia
gp160 of the invention is considered of potential use for HIV-1 vaccination.
Example 5
Study of the effect of different vaccine formulations on the immunogenicity of purified
HIV vaccinia recombinant gp160 (IIIB isolate) in Rhesus monkeys
[0095] In this study, the ability of different vaccine formulations to enhance the immunogenicity
of purified vaccinia recombinant gp160 (rgp160) was evaluated in Rhesus monkeys (Macaca
mulatta). Adjuvants tested were aluminium hydroxide (Alhydrogel, Superfos - Denmark)
in combination with 3D-MPL (Example 2b) (3D Monophosphoryl Lipid A, Ribi); 3D-MPL
in oil in water emulsion (Example 2a).
[0096] Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) weighing 3.5 to 5 kg were randomly assigned into
seven groups containing 3 or 4 animals per group.
[0097] Groups were immunized with different doses of rgp160 formulated in 3 adjuvant formulations,
as follows:
Group 1 (4 monkeys) :100 µg rgp160 adsorbed on aluminium hydroxide plus 3D-MPL
Group 2 (4 monkeys) :20 µg rgp160 adsorbed on aluminium hydroxide plus 3D-MPL
Group 3 (4 monkeys) :100 µg rgp160 plus 3D-MPL in o/w emulsion
Group 4 (4 monkeys) :20 µg rgp160 plus 3D-MPL in o/w emulsion
5.1. Antigen-Adjuvant preparations
[0098] All the rgp160 formulations were prepared immediately before use. Each injection
dose was administered in a 1 ml volume.
[0099] Groups of rhesus monkeys were injected intramuscularly in the brachial triceps with
1 ml dose of various gp160 formulations at day 0 and day 35. Two weeks after the second
immunization, the animals were bled for antibody determinations.
5.2. Read-out
[0100] The sera taken from these animals 2 weeks after the second injection were tested
in ELISA and neutralization assays
5.3. ELISA
[0101] A modification of the capture immunoassay whose general protocol described in Thiriart
et al (Thiriart et al, 1989, J. Immunol 148
6:832-1836) was used This assay uses a commercial monospecific anti gp41 reagent from
Biochrom. A crude lysate of vaccinia gp160 infected BHK 21 cells is used as antigen.
5.4. Neutralization assay
[0102] The microplate neutralization assay is based on the detection of HIV gag antigen
in indicator cells. Briefly, SupT1 cells (Hecht et al, 1984, Science
226:1445) are used as indicator cells. The viral inoculum consists of cell free supernatant
of HIV-1 (IIIB) producing lymphoid cell line. The supernatant is centrifuged at high
speed to eliminate cells and cell debris, aliquoted in 1 ml vials and stored at -
80°C until use. The sera to be tested are inactivated at 56
oC for 30 min. prior to testing. The negative control consists of a pool of sera from
preimmune animals. For neutralization, 750 TCID₅₀ are incubated with serial two fold
dilutions of the sera for 1 hour at 37°C. SupT1 cells are then added (2.10⁴ cells/well)
and incubated 4 days at 37°C. The cytopathic effect is microscopically monitored,
Triton X-100 (1% final concentration) is added to each well and the plate is frozen.
A sandwich ELISA is used to monitor the relative amount of viral antigen produced
in the cultures. The plates are coated with an anti p55 monoclonal antibody. The above
Triton X-100 treated samples are incubated in the plate and the presence of gag antigen
is visualized by biotinylated HIV-1 + human IgGs followed by a streptavidin peroxydase
step. The percentages of reduction of HIV-1 antigen production relative to the controls
are then evaluated for all the serum dilutions tested. Using a curve fit to the data
points by linear regression analysis, the serum dilution (if any) giving a 50% reduction
in antigen production compared to controls, is extrapolated.
5.5. Results
[0103] Table 4 shows the ELISA and neutralizing antibody titer after the second immunization. The
general immunogenicity of HIV rgp160 in 3D-MPL o/w is very good. When doses of 20
µg of gp160 are administered to the animals, the neutralising titre (NT) and ELISA
titers observed were extremely good in the group of animals receiving rgp160 in 3D-MPL
o/w (group 4). These data suggest a superior adjuvant effect of the 3D-MPL o/w emulsion.
The immune response of animals immunized with gp160 adsorbed on Alum in the presence
of 3D-MPL is poor although some, neutralising antibody is produced. The HIV gp160
contains an hydrophobic moiety and this probably confers the molecule a high affinity
for lipids. The HIV rgp160 is best presented to the immune system by using an oil
in water based formulation containing 3D-MPL.
Example 6
6.1 Experimental design
[0104] Two chimpanzees (No.1, No.2) were immunized with purified vaccinia recombinant gp160
(100 µg/dose)(rgp160) from example 1.
[0105] Two chimpanzees (No.3, No.4) were immunized with purified recombinant gp120 (100
µg/dose) expressed in Drosophila Schneider cells (rgp120) (Culp et al., Biotechnology,
9:173-177, 1991).
[0106] The recombinant proteins were formulated with 3D MPL (100 µg/dose) in an o/w emulsion.
The formulation consisted of 0.2% Tween 80, 2.5% Pluronic L121, 5% squalane, 100 µg
3D MPL and recombinant antigen dose (100 µg for rgp160 or rgp120; in a 1 ml injection
volume.
[0107] Animals were immunized intramuscularly in a leg at month 0, 1 and 2.
[0108] Animals were bled every two weeks for antibody determination by ELISA and neutralization
assays (see Example 4.3 for Elisa methodology); the HIV neutralization assay was slightly
modified, as described below). The induction of delayed-type hypersensitivity response
(DTH) was also evaluated, as described below.
6.2 Induction of humoral immunity
[0109] As shown in Table 5, chimpanzees vaccinated either with rgp160 or rgp 120 delivered
in a 3D MPL o/w emulsion produced high ELISA and neutralizing titers after 3 immunizations.
Neutralizing activity could be detected in 3 sera out of 4 after 2 injections and
in 4 out of 4 after a further boost. An increase of the neutralizing titers was observed
following a third immunization. The ELISA and neutralizing titers measured after this
boost are very similar to those obtained in rhesus monkeys immunized three times with
the same rgp160 formulation.
6.3 Induction of DTH
[0110] DTH tests were performed two weeks after the third immunization. All injections were
administered in the belly, in a 100 µl volume per injection.
[0111] The two rgp160 immunized chimps and the two rgp120 treated animals wre skin tested
with 3 different antigens (rgp160, rgD26, tetanus toxoid) and 2 control buffers (rgD2t
control buffer (PBS) and rgp160 control buffer). Different recombinant antigen doses
were tested: 40, 20 or 10 µg for rgp160 and 20, 10 or 5 µg for rgD2t.
[0112] DTH responses were monitored 24 hrs later by measure of skin thickness. Results are
illustrated in Figures 1-3.
[0113] A specific DTH response against tetanus toxoid and rgp160 was observed in animals
vaccinated either with rgp160 (Fig. 1) or with rgp120 (Fig. 2).
[0114] These results indicate that formulations containing 3D MPL in an o/w emulsion are
able to induce a specific T cell response (see Table 6).
[0115] In conclusion, results obtained in chimpanzees clearly indicate that adjuvant formulations
containing 3D MPL in an oil in water emulsion significantly improve humoral (neutralizing
antibodies) and effector cell mediated (DTH) immune responses in primates.
Neutralization assay
[0116] The microplate neutralization assay is based on the visual evaluation of CPE induced
by HIV1 infection in indicator cells. Briefly, SupT1 cells (Hecht et al, 1984, Science
226:1445) are used as indicator cells. The viral inoculum consists of cell free supernatant
of HIV-1 (IIIB) producing lymphoid cell line. The supernatant is centrifuged at high
speed to eliminate cells and cell debris, aliquoted in 1 ml vials and stored at -80°C
until use. The sera to be tested are inactivated at 56°C for 30 min. prior to testing.
Our negative control consists of a pool of sera from preimmune animals. For neutralization,
750 TCID₅₀ are incubated with serial two fold dilutions of the sera for 1 hour at
37°C. SupT1 cells are then added (2.10⁴ cells/well) and incubated 4 days at 37°C.
The cytopathic effect is microscopically monitored on day 4 and the neutralizing titers
are visually determined. The given neutralization titers correspond to the reciprocal
of the dilution of serum giving 80% reduction of syncytia formation as compared to
preimmune controls. The visually determined titers are further objectivated on day
7 by measuring cell viability in each well using the MTT assay described by Pauwels
et al (J. Virol. Methods
20:309-321, 1988). The titers determined in this assay represent the reciprocal of the
serium dilution giving 80% protection against CPE as compared to uninfected cells.
The visually and MTT determined titers are very reproducible from one assay to another
and the MTT determined titers (not shown) are 2 to 4 fold lower than the visually
determined ones.
Table 1
Purification of HIV gp160 expressed in CV-1 and in BHK-21 cells |
Purification step |
Volume (ml) |
Total Protein(mg) |
Protein recovery(%) |
Antigen recovery(%) |
CV-1 (1) |
|
|
|
|
Lysis |
1400 |
2000 |
100 |
100 |
Lentil lectin |
350 |
100 |
5 |
80 |
Immunoaffinity |
60 |
8 |
0.4 |
65 |
BHK-21 (2) |
|
|
|
|
Lysis |
1480 |
2688 |
100 |
100 |
Lentil lectin |
495 |
113 |
4 |
79 |
Immunoaffinity |
60 |
7 |
0.3 |
58 |
(1) : 20 1 culture as starting material |
(2) : 14 1 culture (2.1 x 10¹⁰ cells) as starting material |
