[0001] This invention relates to formulations for manually washing dishes.
[0002] Light-duty liquid detergent formulations for kitchen surfaces are well known. Kitchen
surfaces include counter tops, stove tops, dishes and any other hard surface commonly
found in kitchen environments. The term "dishes" includes any utensils involved in
food preparation or consumption. Kitchen surfaces, particularly dishes, must be washed
free of food residues, greases, proteins, starches, gums, dyes, oils and burnt organic
residues.
[0003] Most of the consumer accepted formulations in use include anionic synthetic surfactants
with or without a nonionic surfactant. Many of such formulations contain a sulphonate-type
anionic surfactant, for example, an alkylbenzene sulphonate or an alkane sulfonate,
in conjunction with a sulphate or alkyl ether sulphate, or a nonionic surfactant,
for example, an alcohol ethoxylate, an alkyl phenol ethoxylate, a mono- or diethanolamide
or an amine oxide. The sulphonate material generally predominates.
[0004] It is the anionic surfactant that provides the typical high foaming (suds) characteristics
generally associated with dish washing formulations. Foam (suds) is the cleaning efficacy
signal relied on by consumers. Nonionic surfactants generally do not provide good
foaming characteristics.
[0005] It is known from US-A-2,746,928 that it is not possible to mix anionic surface-active
agents with quaternary ammonium germicides. The cationic quaternary ammonium germicide
reacts with the anionic surface-active agent resulting in a reduction in germicidal
and detergent activity.
[0006] Thus anionic surfactants are incompatible with cationic quaternary antimicrobial
surfactants and nonionic surfactants do not normally provide significant foaming capability
to liquid formulations. Therefore current dish washing formulations can only mechanically
eliminate bacteria from kitchen hard surfaces. They are not effective in killing or
controlling the spread of germs throughout the kitchen environment. Thus dish washing
liquids combining good foaming and antimicrobial activities are not available to the
consumer.
[0007] The present invention provides an aqueous disinfecting liquid formulation for cleaning
hard surfaces, particularly dishes, in a kitchen environment; wherein said formulation
is free of anionic surfactants and consisting essentially of:
a) 0.5 to 15 weight percent of a quaternary disinfecting compound;
b) 0.5 to 20 weight percent of a C₁₂-C₁₃ alcohol ethoxylate nonionic surfactant;
c) 0.5 to 20 weight percent of a C₁₃- C₁₅ alcohol ethoxylate nonionic surfactant;
d) 0.5 to 20.0 weight percent lauryl dimethyl amine oxide nonionic surfactant;
e) 1.5 to 20.0 weight percent cocoamidopropyl betaine nonionic surfactant;
f) 0.5 to 20.0 weight percent cocodiethanol amide nonionic surfactant;
g) 1.0 to 20.0 weight percent cocamidopropyl hydroxyl sultaine and
h) 0.2 to 2.0 weight percent disodium EDTA.
[0008] This formulation of this invention will control the presence and spread of bacteria
on hard surfaces in the kitchen environment, especially dishes. This invention is
a microbiological active quaternary ingredient homogeneously incorporated into a nonionic
aqueous surfactant system. Unexpectedly the formulation has good flash foaming and
residual foaming capability although no anionic surfactants are included.
[0009] Optional ingredients can include fragrances, dyes and stabilizers.
[0010] The purpose of the quaternary ammonium disinfectants is to kill on contact gram positive
and gram negative organisms the organisms encountered in kitchen environments. Useful
such disinfectants include BTC 8358 which is N- Alkyl (50% C₁₄, 40% C₁₂, and 10% C₁₆)
dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride. Other quaternary ammonium salt may be any of the
well-known class of quaternary ammonium germicides characterized by the formula:

wherein at least one of the radicals R₁, R₂, R₃ and R₄ is a hydrophobic, aliphatic,
aryl aliphatic, or aliphatic aryl radical of from 6 to 26 carbon atoms and the entire
cation portion of the molecule has a molecular weight of at least 165. The hydrophobic
radicals may be long-chain alkyl, long-chain alkoxy aryl, long-chain alkyl aryl, halogen-substituted
long-chain alkyl aryl, long-chain alkyl phenoxy alkyl, aryl alkyl, and so forth, in
nature. The remaining radicals on the nitrogen atom other than the hydrophobic radicals
are substituents of hydrocarbon structure usually containing a total of no more than
12 carbon atoms. The radical X in the above formula is any salt-forming anionic radical.
[0011] Suitable quaternary ammonium salts within the above description include the alkyl
ammonium halides such as cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide, alkyl aryl ammonium halides
such as octadecyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium bromide, N-alkyl pyridinium halides such
as N-cetyl pyridinium bromide, and the like. Other suitable types of quaternary ammonium
salts include those in which the molecule contains either, amide or ester linkages
such as octyl phenoxy ethoxy ethyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride, N-(laurylcocoaminoformylmethyl)
- pyridinium chloride, and so forth Other very effective types of quaternary ammonium
germicides are those in which the hydrophobic radical is characterized by a substituted
aromatic nucleus as in the case of lauryloxyphenyltrimethyl ammonium chloride, cetylaminophenyltrimethyl
ammonium methosulfate, dodecylphenyltrimethyl ammonium methosulfate, dodecylbenzyltrimethyl
ammonium chloride, chlorinated dodecylbenzyltrimethyl ammonium chloride, and the like.
[0012] Preferred quaternary ammonium germicides of the above general types are the long-chain
alkyl dimethylbenzyl quaternary ammonium salts, the alkyl phenoxy alkoxy alkyl dimethyl
benzyl quaternary ammonium salts, the N-(acylcocoaminoformylmethyl)pyridinium halides,
the long-chain alkyl trimethyl ammonium halides, the long-chain alkyl benzyl dimethyl
benzyl ammonium halides, and the long-chain alkyl benzyl diethyl ethanol ammonium
halides in which the alkyl radical contains from 8-18 carbon atoms.
[0013] The mechanism of this nonionic system for cleaning standard food and kitchen soils
is through emulsification of the soils. Current anionic light duty liquids solubilize
most food soils. When soil is emulsified within a system, it will affect the type,
density and amount of foam that can be generated. In general, emulsified fatty soils
will reduce the amount of foam that can be generated as further cleaning takes place.
Since anionic systems solubilize soils, the effect on the foam is not as great as
with nonionic systems. Therefore, foam generated from anionic systems is of greater
volume and more stable throughout the cleaning process.
[0014] In general, anionic surfactant systems such as those found in the current light duty
liquids are classified as high foamers. Conversely, nonionic surfactant systems are
classified as low foamers.
[0015] The challenge was to achieve disinfection activity while producing consumer acceptable
foam using a nonionic and cationic surfactant combination. By careful selection and
great experimentation, we have identified a surfactant mixture, expressed in Example
1, Table 1, that produce consumer acceptable foam comparable to commercial dish washing
liquids using anionic detergents. The useful nonionic surfactants have various chain
lengths and degrees of ethoxylation that allow the dish washing liquid to be effective
on a wide range of food soils while providing good flash foam volume as well as moderate
foam stability. This system provides the consumer with effective cleaning on, but
not limited to, greasy food soils, fatty food soils, and oily food soils while maintaining
disinfection.
Example 1
[0016] The unexpected foaming properties of the formulations of the invention are illustrated
in this example. The foaming properties are due to the carefully balanced mix of nonionic
surfactants. The formulation tested in this example contained the preferred concentration
of ingredients listed in Table 1.
Table 1
|
Preferred |
Range |
Ammonyx LO (30%) |
5.00 |
0.5-20.0 |
Mirataine CBS (43%) |
5.00 |
1.0-20.0 |
Neodol 25-12 |
5.00 |
0.5-20.0 |
Neodol 23-6.5 |
5.00 |
0.5-20.0 |
Mackam DZ (35%) |
5.00 |
1.5-20.0 |
Mackamide C |
5.00 |
0.5-20.0 |
BTC 8358 (80%) |
1.40 |
0.5-15.0 |
Uvinul D-50 |
0.02 |
0.0- 0.1 |
Disodium EDTA |
1.00 |
0.2- 2.0 |
BHT |
0.10 |
0.0- 0.2 |
Fragrance |
0.35 |
0.0- 0.5 |
Liquitint Patent Blue (1%) |
0.08 |
0.0- 0.5 |
Water, DI |
67.05 |
35.0-85.0 |
[0017] The formulation was prepared by adding the water, Ammonyx LO and Mirataine CBS to
a beaker and mixing until uniform. Neodol 25-12 and Mackamide C were combined and
then added to the beaker and mixed until uniform. Next Neodol 23-6.5 and UvindulD-50
were combined, added to the beaker and mixed until uniform. Finally Mackam DZ, BTC
8358 and EDTA were added to the beaker in sequence and mixed until uniform. The BHT
and fragrance are premixed until uniform and then added to the beaker.
[0018] The chemical name and function of each ingredient in Table 1 is presented below in
table 2.
Table 2
Trade Name |
Chemical Name |
Function |
Ammonyx LO |
Lauryl dimethyl amine oxide |
nonionic surfactant |
Neodol 25-12 |
C₁₃-C₁₅ Alcohol ethoxylate |
nonionic surfactant |
Neodol 23-6.5 |
C₁₂-C₁₃ Alcohol ethoxylate |
nonionic surfactant |
Mackam DZ |
Cocoamidopropyl betaine |
nonionic surfactant |
Mirataine CBS |
Cocamidopropyl hydroxyl sultaine |
nonionic surfactant |
Mackamide C |
Cocodiethanol amide |
nonionic surfactant |
BTC 8358 |
n-alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride |
stabilizer |
Disodium EDTA |
Disodium ETA |
chelator |
BHT |
Benzylhydroxyltoluene |
stabilizer |
DI water |
deionized water |
diluent |
The good foaming capability is established by measuring foam height. Foam height was
determined in unloaded and loaded water. Loaded refers to water to which oil has been
added to simulate oils encountered during ordinary dishwashing. Unloaded refers to
water to which no oil had been added.
[0019] Deionized water (512g at 120
oF) was mixed with 2g of the Table 1 preferred formulation in a 1500 mL beaker. The
mixture was then beaten with a hand held egg beater mix for 50 revolutions or cycles.
The foam height was measured at 15 minutes and 30 minutes intervals for the unloaded
diluted dish washing liquid.
[0020] The same procedure was repeated for the loaded dish washing liquid by adding 2g of
Crisco.
[0021] The commercial formulation to which the formulation of this invention was compared
was an anionic based dishwashing liquid. The formulation of the invention had a foam
height of 25.4mm for the loaded water and 50.8mm for the unloaded water. The commercial
liquid had a foam height of 25.4mm for the loaded and 63.5mm for the unloaded. These
results show that the formulations of the invention have good foaming characteristics
without use of any anionic surfactants.
Example 2
[0022] The formulation in example 1 was tested for antimicrobial activity effectiveness
against
Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) and
Salmonella choleraesuis (ATCC 6538) by AOAC
Use Dilution Method as described in AOAC 15th Edition, 1990. The test was carried out at a dilution of
1 part formulation to 256 parts deionized water, at 5 minutes contact time and at
different temperatures. This test is used microbiological activity for practical disinfection
on hard surface carriers. In the test, a carrier is contaminated with test microorganisms
through immersion in a broth culture. After the carrier is dried, it is immersed for
10 minutes with the individual formulation to be evaluated. The carrier, in a nutrient
medium, is incubated for 48 hours. After 48 hours, the carrier is observed for growth
of survivors. Ten to sixty carriers are examined for bacterial growth after contact
with the test formulations. Test results ate expressed in terms of the number positive
carriers out of the number of carriers being tested. Positive carriers are those having
growth of the test organism. The results obtained are presented in Table 3.
Table 3
Test No. |
Temp |
No of Positive/Total Tested |
|
|
Staph aureus |
Sal.choleraesuis |
1 |
20°C |
20/30 |
|
- |
2 |
50°C |
|
0/30 |
|
3 |
45°C |
|
0/30 |
|
4 |
40°C |
|
0/30 |
|
5 |
40°C |
0/40 |
|
1/60 |
6 |
35°C |
2/30 |
|
3/60 |
The data of Table 3 illustrates the disinfection activity of the formulation of example
1 at 5 minutes contact time and 40°C.
[0023] Examples 1 and 2 show that antibacterial dishwashing liquid formulation of the invention
both cleans and kill bacteria present in the kitchen environment. This includes, but
is not limited to dishes, counter tops, sink and dishwasher.
1. An aqueous disinfecting liquid formulation for cleaning hard surfaces in a kitchen
environment; wherein the formulation is free of anionic surfactants and consisting
essentially of:
a) 0.5 to 15 weight percent of a quaternary disinfecting compound;
b) 0.5 to 20 weight percent of a C₁₂-C₁₃ alcohol ethoxylate nonionic surfactant;
c) 0.5 to 20 weight percent of a C₁₃- C₁₅ alcohol ethoxylate nonionic surfactant;
d) 0.5 to 20.0 weight percent lauryl dimethyl amine oxide nonionic surfactant;
e) 1.5 to 20.0 weight percent cocoamidopropyl betaine nonionic surfactant;
f) 0.5 to 20.0 weight percent cocodiethanol amide nonionic surfactant;
g) 1.0 to 20.0 weight percent cocamidopropyl hydroxyl sultaine and
h) 0.2 to 2.0 weight percent disodium EDTA.
2. The formulation of claim 1 consisting essentially of
a) 5 weight percent of alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride;
b) 5 weight percent of a C₁₂-C₁₃ alcohol ethoxylate nonionic surfactant;
c) 5 weight percent of a C₁₃- C₁₅ alcohol ethoxylate nonionic surfactant;
d) 5 to 20.0 weight percent lauryl dimethyl amine oxide nonionic surfactant;
e) 5 weight percent cocoamidopropyl betaine nonionic surfactant;
f) 5 weight percent cocodiethanol amide nonionic surfactant;
g) 5 weight percent cocamidopropyl hydroxyl sultaine;
h) 1 weight percent disodium EDTA.
3. The formulation of claim 1 or 2 wherein the quaternary disinfecting compound is alkyl
(50% C¹⁴, 40% C₁₂ and 10% C₁₆) dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride.
4. A method of manually washing hard surfaces in a kitchen environment, comprising the
steps of:
a) providing a disinfecting liquid according to any one of claims 1, 2 or 3;
b) diluting the liquid with water; and
c) contacting the surfaces with the diluted formulation.