[0001] This invention relates to current detection in power conversion.
[0002] Power supplies include current limiting circuits for several reasons, among them,
to protect internal components of the power supply from excessive power dissipation,
to protect the source from overload, and to prevent damaging currents from entering
a user's wiring and load.
[0003] In addition, zero current switching (ZCS) converters of the type described in U.S.
Patent 4,415,959, incorporated by reference, must limit their output current for proper
operation since there is a value of load current above which zero-crossing will not
occur. One such ZCS converter 10, shown in Figure 1, has a leakage-inductance transformer
12 that transfers power from a primary 11 to a secondary winding 13. The power transfer
occurs in a series of energy transfer cycles, where the switching frequency of switch
16 varies the amount of power delivered to the load 20.
[0004] Various control schemes may be implemented to keep I
choke at or below a maximum value. For example, a resistive shunt 30 may be placed in the
serial path which carries I
choke, as shown in Figure 3. The voltage across this resistor 30, V
shunt, indicates I
choke, and may be input to appropriate control circuitry to limit the value of I
choke. In other schemes, the output current may be sensed magnetically (e.g., by means
of a transformer with a suitable core reset circuit; by means of a Hall-effect device).
[0005] In general, in one aspect, the invention features delivering power from an input
source to a load via a first capacitor in a series of energy transfer cycles, and
sensing a rate of change of voltage across the first capacitor as an indication of
current flowing in the first capacitor.
[0006] Preferred embodiments include one or more of the following features: During at least
a portion of each of the energy transfer cycles, all of the current delivered to the
load is delivered by the first capacitor. The measuring (sensing) is done in a sense
capacitor which is connected in parallel with the first capacitor to carry a current
which is proportional to the current flowing in the first capacitor. A sense resistor
is connected in series with the sense capacitor and the voltage across the sense resistor
is provided as a sense output. The capacitance of the sense capacitor is less than
half, preferably less than 1%, of the capacitance of the first capacitor. A current
fed to the load is controlled in response to the sense output. Energy is transferred
to the first capacitor by zero-current switching power conversion, in a succession
of energy transfer cycles, each of the energy transfer cycles including a first time
period during which energy is transferred to the first capacitor, and a second time
period during which energy is transferred from the first capacitor to the load.
[0007] In practical embodiments we have shown that the sense circuitry may have only an
insignificant effect on conversion efficiency. It can use economical, small circuit
components in a simple configuration which can be implemented without the need for
special manufacturing processes and without the packaging or thermal implications
of lossy resistive elements.
[0008] In general, in another aspect, the invention features limiting output current of
a power converter, by producing a signal indicative of the rate of change of a voltage
across a capacitor through which the output current flows, and using the signal to
control the output current (e.g., using the signal in a feedback control loop to limit
the output current).
[0009] Other advantages and features will become apparent from the following description.
[0010] In the drawings:
Figure 1 is a circuit diagram of a zero-current switching power supply;
Figure 2 shows waveforms found during an operating cycle of the converter of Figure
1;
Figure 3 is a circuit diagram of a power converter which includes a resistive output
current measuring device;
Figure 4 is a circuit diagram of a zero-current switching power converter which includes
an output current detection device;
Figure 5 is a diagram of an equivalent circuit model for a zero-current switching
converter;
Figures 6 and 7 show operating waveforms for the converter and current detection circuitry
of Figure 5; and
Figure 8 is a circuit diagram of a zero-current switching converter which includes
output voltage and output current control circuitry.
[0011] In the known current detection scheme of Figure 3, a resistive element 30 senses
the instantaneous value of I
choke 25. V
shunt = I
choke*R
shunt and both the instantaneous and average value of V
shunt 6 are proportional to the respective values of I
choke. Therefore, by use of appropriate signal processing circuitry, the voltage V
shunt may then be used for: (1) detecting when either the average or instantaneous value
of I
choke exceeds some predetermined level, and (2) asserting some predetermined control strategy
to control the output current to remain at or below some value. This "current-limiting"
action is usually required in a power supply to protect either the power supply, or
the load, or both, under fault or overload conditions.
[0012] The scheme of Figure 3 is inherently lossy. While in theory it is possible to reduce
this loss simply by reducing the value of R
shunt, this is often not possible in practice. As R
shunt is reduced, so too is V
shunt, and circuitry which can reliably detect very low values of voltage (e.g., below
a few tens of millivolts) within the relatively noisy environment of a switching power
supply may be complex, costly or unreliable. Thus, there is usually some minimum design
value of V
shunt, V
min (e.g., V
min = 50 mV), which is practical for use as a current-limit detection threshold. In a
power converter designed to deliver P
out Watts at an output voltage 18 equal to V
out volts, the loss in the resistive element, P
det, as a fraction of converter output power rating, can be shown to be:

It is noteworthy that, for a fixed V
min, the loss in the shunt increases as V
out drops. With contemporary system voltages trending lower (e.g., to 3.3, 2, and 1 volt),
this implies lowered system efficiency. For example, in a converter delivering 5 volts
to a load at 300 Watts, with a V
min threshold of 50 mV, the loss in the shunt is 1%, or 3 Watts. On the other hand, for
a similar converter delivering 1 volt, the loss is 5%, or 15 Watts.
[0013] In a zero-current switching converter, an efficient current measuring scheme takes
advantage of the fact that, during a portion of the energy transfer cycle, I
choke is exclusively supplied by capacitor 26. Thus, during an energy transfer cycle of
the zero-current switching converter of Figure 1 the load 20 is assumed to be operated
at a constant DC voltage, V
out (e.g., the load may contain filter capacitors, not shown, which act to reduce time
variations in V
out to an essentially negligible amount). The value of the output inductor 28 is also
assumed to be relatively large in comparison to the secondary-reflected value of the
leakage inductance of the transformer 12, L₁, so that under steady state load conditions
the value of I
choke may be considered to be essentially constant over a converter operating cycle.
[0014] Waveforms during an energy transfer cycle of the zero-current switching converter
of Figure 1 are illustrated in Figure 2. Just prior to time t=t₁ a value of current,
I
choke is flowing in the loop formed by the output inductor 28, the load 20, and the diode
24. The diode prevents charging of the capacitor 26, holding the value of the capacitor
voltage, V
res, at essentially zero. At time t=t₁, switch 16 is closed. Between time t=t₁ and t=t₂
the secondary-reflected value of the input source voltage is effectively impressed
across the secondary-reflected leakage inductance of the transformer 12 and current
in the forward rectifier 22, I
f, ramps up to a value equal to I
choke as current in the diode 24 ramps down to zero. After time t=t₂, the diode 24 ceases
conduction and between time t=t₂ and t=t₃ energy is transferred from the input source
to the capacitor 26 via the leakage inductance of the transformer 12. During this
time period both the current in the forward rectifier 22 and the voltage across the
capacitor 26, V
res, vary sinusoidally during an energy transfer cycle having a characteristic time scale
of pi*sqrt(L₁*C
res), where C
res is the value of capacitor 26. At time t=t₃ the current I
f returns to zero and the switch is opened. Between t=t₃ and t=t₄ the entire current
I
choke flows in the capacitor 26, discharging the capacitor until the voltage across the
capacitor is once again limited to zero volts by diode 24. Thus, during the time period
between t=t₃ and t=t₄ (e.g., the "discharge period") the rate-of-change of voltage,
dV
res/dt, across capacitor 26 is directly proportional to the current I
choke. Between times t=t₄ and t=t₅ the current I
choke again flows in the loop formed by the output inductor 28, the load 20, and the diode
24. At time t=t₅ another cycle begins.
[0015] As shown in Figure 4, the rate-of-change of V
res may be measured by a capacitor 60 in series with a resistor 62, placed in parallel
with capacitor 26. Capacitor 60 has a small capacitance C
sense, compared to that of capacitor 26 C
res, and the resistance of resistor 62, R
sense, is small, so that the voltage, V
comp 64, across resistor 62 is small compared to the voltage V
res 68 across capacitor 26.
[0016] In Figure 4, the sum of the currents, I
res + I
sense, flowing in the capacitors 26, 60 is equal to I
choke during the time period t=t₃ to t=t₄. If, during this discharge period, the instantaneous
value of voltage across the sense resistor is small compared to the instantaneous
value of V
res, then the currents may closely approximated by:



Combining the preceding three equations, and noting that the voltage across the sense
resistor, V
comp, is equal to:

results in the close approximation:

Thus the voltage V
comp is proportional to I
choke during the discharge period, the constant of proportionality depending on the absolute
and relative values of R
sense, C
sense and C
res. The circuit of Figure 4 therefore produces a voltage directly proportional to the
output current, and, as will be shown below, it can do so without introducing significant
energy loss provided the value of C
sense is small with respect to the value of C
res.
[0017] Operation of the current detection scheme described above may be described with reference
to the equivalent circuit model of a zero-current switching converter (Figure 5).
The circuit includes an input voltage source 29 having a value of 15 Volts; a switch
16; an inductance, L₁, of 15 nanohenries; a capacitor, C
res, of value 1 microfarad; a diode 24 in parallel with C
res; a sense capacitor, C
sense, of value 470 picofarads; and a sense resistor, R
sense, of value 10 ohms. The voltage source 29 and leakage inductance 69 are representative
either of discrete circuit elements used in a non-isolated converter or of secondary-reflected
equivalent circuit values in an isolated converter using a leakage-inductance transformer.
In the example, for purposes of illustration, the (normally relatively large) output
inductor is replaced with a constant current source 70.
[0018] In the waveforms of Figure 6 the value of the current source is 80 Amperes; in Figure
7 the value of the current source is 40 Amperes. In both Figures 6 and 7 the switch
is turned on to initiate an energy transfer cycle and is turned off when the current
I
forward returns to zero. During the time period beginning when the switch is turned off and
ending when the voltage V
res declines (linearly) to zero (e.g., the discharge period), the voltage developed at
the junction of C
sense and R
sense, V
comp, is seen to be essentially constant. The values of V
comp during this time period are, respectively, -376 millivolts and -188 millivolts, which
values are equal to those predicted by Equation 4 for the indicated values of the
circuit elements and current sources.
[0019] In the examples given above, I
choke was assumed to be essentially constant throughout an operating cycle. This assumption
was made to simplify the illustration and description of the inventive concepts. However,
the concept (of indicating the absolute value of a current, I
choke, by measuring the rate-of-change of a capacitor voltage during a period of time during
which the entire amount of the current flows in the capacitor) is generally applicable
to the more typical case in which I
choke will exhibit some time variations during the operating cycle (due to the finite value
of the output inductor). In such cases the value of V
comp will still accurately indicate the absolute value of I
choke during the discharge period.
[0020] The power dissipated in the current detection circuit of Figure 5 is less than 0.02
Watts at a converter output current of 80 Amperes, and this essentially negligible
loss is achieved despite the fact that a relatively large current sense signal (e.g.,
close to -0.4 Volt) is generated. This may be compared to a conventional current sense
circuit using a resistive shunt. Assume, for example, that it is desired to deliver
80 Amperes to a load at a load voltage of 2 Volts. To achieve a 0.4 Volt current sense
signal would result in an unacceptably large shunt dissipation of 32 Watts. If a 50
millivolt current sense signal were used instead, the loss would still be 4 Watts.
In either case, the conventional sense circuit will result in a substantial loss in
the resistive sense element and a reduction in overall conversion efficiency. Our
present current detection circuit,
however, will have an insignificant effect on conversion efficiency and will achieve
this result using economical, small, circuit components in a simple circuit configuration
which can be implemented without the need for special manufacturing processes (e.g.,
soldering of shunts) and which have none of the packaging or thermal implications
of lossy resistive elements.
[0021] Additional control circuitry, shown included in the power converter 71 of Figure
8, may be used to control output current I
out in response to V
comp. Power converter 71 includes a zero-current switching power train 10 (of the kind
shown in Figure 4) governed by a zero-current switching controller 72. The controller
turns switch 16 on and off at times of zero current at an operating frequency indicated
by the signal V
f (which is delivered to the controller by voltage error amplifier 73). The converter
71 includes both an output voltage control loop and a current limit circuit 100. The
output voltage control loop consists of a high gain error amplifier 73 which receives
two inputs: a voltage value V
set and an input from a voltage divider consisting of resistors 102, 104. The voltage
V
set is generated by current source 106 feeding reference voltage circuit 108. The reference
voltage circuit 108 clamps the voltage V
set at a predetermined value, V
ref2. The voltage divider output, V
div, is a fraction of the converter output voltage V
out. The error amplifier adjusts the signal V
f so as to maintain the V
div essentially equal to V
set. In this way the output voltage control loop acts to adjust the converter operating
frequency so as to maintain V
out at an essentially constant value which is dependent upon V
ref2 and the ratio of the voltage divider resistors.
[0022] The signal V
comp has the time varying behavior shown in Figures 6 and 7, where the negative excursion
of the signal subsequent to the switch 16 turning off (referred to hereafter as V
neg) is indicative of the output current of the converter. This signal is delivered to
current limit circuit 100. The high gain, high speed error amplifier 110 compares
the signal V
comp to a negative reference of value V
ref1 111. If the instantaneous value of V
comp is positive with respect to V
ref1, the amplifier 110 will attempt to source current, I
D, toward capacitor 112 (and the junction of current source 106 and reference voltage
clamp 108). This is prevented, however, by the polarity of the diode 114 connected
in series with the output of the amplifier 110. Should V
comp become negative with respect to V
ref1, however, the amplifier will be able to sink current through diode 114 and this will
cause current to be shunted away from the reference clamp 108. As the absolute value
of V
neg increases above V
ref1 (e.g., as the output current exceeds an output current limit value indicated by V
ref1) the amplifier will withdraw charge from smoothing capacitor 112 during a portion
of each operating cycle and current source 106 will sink charge into the capacitor
112 during the balance of the cycle. This will cause the voltage V
set to be pulled below the clamp value V
ref2 and result in a concomitant reduction in V
out. Because of the high gain of amplifier 110, the amplifier 110 will withdraw sufficient
charge from capacitor 112 during the portion of the operating cycle that V
comp is more negative than V
ref1 to ensure that V
set assumes a value (which is below V
ref2 and smoothed by capacitor 112) which is just sufficient to hold V
neg essentially equal to V
ref1. Thus, if the load is increased, the current limit circuit 100 will act to adjust
the converter output voltage to a value which prevents the converter output current
from exceeding some predetermined value. For example, if the circuit elements in the
power train 10 of Figure 8 were the same as those cited in the example discussed in
conjunction with Figures 5, 6, and 7, then the value of V
ref1 might be set to 390 or 400 millivolts as a means of current limiting the converter
output to a value close to 80 Amperes.
Other embodiments are feasible.
For example, the current limiting circuitry may also be integrated with the control
circuitry used to control the output voltage V
out, e.g., the feedback loop including error amp 73. All, or part, of the circuitry may
be embodied as an integrated circuit or hybrid device. The current limiting control
circuitry might cause the output current to "fold back" as V
out declines in an overload condition.
1. Apparatus comprising power conversion circuitry adapted operatively to deliver power
from an input source to a load via a first capacitor in a series of energy transfer
cycles, characterised in further comprising circuitry adapted operatively to measure
rate of change of voltage across said capacitor and to deliver an output which is
indicative of a current flowing in the capacitor.
2. Apparatus according to Claim 1, further characterised in that during at least a portion
of each of said energy transfer cycles, all of the current delivered to said load
is delivered by said first capacitor.
3. Apparatus according to Claim 1 or Claim 2, further characterised in that said circuitry
is connected to carry a current which is proportional to the current flowing in said
first capacitor.
4. Apparatus according to any preceding claim, further characterised in that said circuitry
is connected in parallel with said capacitor and comprises a sense capacitor.
5. Apparatus according to Claim 4, further characterised in that said circuitry comprises
a sense resistor in series with said sense capacitor and in that said output comprises
the voltage across said sense resistor.
6. Apparatus according to Claim 5, further characterised in that said sense capacitor
has a capacitance which is smaller than the capacitance of said first capacitor.
7. Apparatus according to Claim 6, further characterised in that said sense capacitor
has a capacitance which is less than half, preferably less than 1%, of the capacitance
of said first capacitor.
8. Apparatus according to any preceding claim, characterised in further comprising a
controller adapted operatively to control a current fed to said load in response to
said output of said circuitry.
9. Apparatus according to any preceding claim, further characterised in that each of
said energy transfer cycles comprises a first time period during which energy is transferred
to said first capacitor, and a second time period during which energy is transferred
from said first capacitor to said load.
10. Apparatus according to any preceding claim, further characterised in that said power
conversion circuitry comprises a zero-current switching conversion circuitry.
11. Apparatus comprising: a first capacitor connected operatively to feed a load, a rate
of change of voltage across said capacitor being indicative of current flowing in
said first capacitor; and circuitry adapted operatively to measure said rate of change
of voltage and to deliver an output which is indicative of the current flowing in
said capacitor.
12. Apparatus according to Claim 11, further characterised in that said circuitry comprises
a sense capacitor and a sense resistor in series, said sense capacitor having a capacitance
which is less than half of the capacitance of said first capacitor, said series connected
capacitor and resistor being connected in parallel with said first capacitor to share
a portion of said current flowing in said first capacitor, a voltage across said sense
resistor being an output indicative of the rate of change of voltage across said first
capacitor.
13. A method for use in power conversion comprising delivering power from an input source
to a load via a first capacitor in a series of energy transfer cycles, characterised
in sensing a rate of change of voltage across said first capacitor as an indication
of current flowing in said first capacitor.
14. A method according to Claim 13, further characterised in that said sensing comprising
detecting a current flowing through circuitry connected across said first capacitor,
which is proportional to said current flowing in said first capacitor.
15. A method according to Claim 14, further characterised in that said circuitry connected
across said first capacitor comprises a sense capacitor in series with a sense resistor.
16. A method according to Claim 15, further characterised in that said sensing comprises
detecting the voltage across said sense resistor as an indication of current in said
first capacitor.
17. A method according to any of Claims 13 to 16, further characterised in controlling
a current fed to said load in response to said indication of said current flowing
in said first capacitor and said load.
18. A method according to any of Claims 13 to 17, further characterised in that each of
said energy transfer cycles comprises a first time period during which energy is transferred
to said first capacitor, and a second time period during which energy is transferred
from said first capacitor to said load.
19. A method for limiting output current of a power converter, the method comprising producing
a signal indicative of a rate of change of a voltage across a capacitor through which
at least some output current flows, and using the signal to control the output current.
20. A method according to Claim 19, further characterised in that said signal is delivered
in a feedback control loop to limit the output current.