FIELD OF INVENTION
[0001] This invention relates to radiographic intensifying screens for converting image-wise
modulated X-radiation into ultraviolet and/or blue radiation. More specifically this
invention is related to lithium tantalate phosphors for use in a radiographic intensifying
screen.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] X-ray excited phosphors are well known for their use in medical radiography. Medical
X-ray films are typically sensitive to UV, blue or green light and therefore the X-radiation
containing the diagnostic information must be converted to lower energy to optimally
expose the film. This conversion is done by an intensifying screen comprising an appropriate
phosphor as the principal active ingredient.
[0003] Phosphors which are suitable for converting X-ray energy to the appropriate lower
energy are well known. The specific desirable properties include: high conversion
efficiency, low granularity and a low quantity of afterglow emission. Particularly
useful are phosphors for use in x-ray intensifying screens which have an emission
in the near UV and blue. The most widely known phosphor for this purpose is CaWO
4 which has become the industry standard. There is an ongoing desire in the art to
provide UV or blue emitting medical x-ray intensifying screens which have a higher
speed than intensifying screens comprising CaWO
4.
[0004] Zegarski teaches a lithium tantalate and lithium niobate phosphor in U.S. Patent
5,064,729. However, this compound results from the reaction of lithium oxide with
an oxide of sulfur. The lithium tantalate formed from this reaction is known to be
LiTaO
3 or LiNbO
3 each of which is different from the phosphors of the present invention both in terms
of reactivity and chemical composition.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] It is an object of the present invention to provide an x-ray intensifying screen
for use in radiographic elements.
[0006] The present invention provides an x-ray intensifying screen comprising a support
and at least one active layer coated on said support; wherein said active layer comprises
a binder and a phosphor corresponding to the formula

wherein x is 0.002 to 0.10.
[0007] A further embodiment of the invention, the x-ray intensifying screen of the present
invention is used in combination with a suitable film. Thus, the present invention
also provides a radiographic recording element comprising at least one x-ray intensifying
screen in operative association with a photosensitive film element wherein said x-ray
intensifying screen comprises; a support; at least one active layer coated on said
support and said active layer comprises a phosphor corresponding to the formula:

wherein x is 0.002 to 0.10.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0008] Fig. 1 is a graph illustrating the relative speed of Li
3Ta
1-xNb
xO
4 as x increases from 0.0 to 0.10.
[0009] Fig. 2 is a graph illustrating the relative speed of Li
3Ta
1-xNb
xO
4 as x increases from 0.0 to 0.60.
[0010] Fig. 3 is a graph illustrating the maximum emission of an X-ray excited Li
3Ta
1-xNb
xO
4 wherein x is 0.50 to 1.0. The discontinuity represents the structural transition
from monoclinic morphology to cubic morphology.
[0011] Fig. 4 is a graph illustrating the maximum emission of an X-ray excited monoclinic
Li
3Ta
1-xNb
xO
4 wherein x is 0.0 to 0.6.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0012] The screen of the present invention comprises a phosphor which corresponds to the
formula:

wherein x is 0.002 to 0.10. Preferred is a phosphor where x is 0.002 to 0.07 and
more preferred is a phosphor where x is between 0.002 and 0.010. When x is outside
of the range of 0.002 to 0.010 a drop in intensity is observed as indicated in Figure
1 wherein "Sp" is speed relative to High Plus arbitrarily defined as 1.0.
[0013] Preparation of the phosphor of the present invention is well documented in the art
and yet the use of this phosphor in an X-ray intensifying screen has not been previously
contemplated. The preparation of the phosphor is known to proceed according to following
reaction:

[0014] The preparative procedure typically involves intimately mixing the proper ratios
of the phosphor precursors, such as Li
2CO
3, Ta205 and Nb
2O
5 in a suitable flux such as Li
2SO
4 or LiCl. This mixture is heated in an alumina crucible at 1000°C. The flux is removed
by dissolving in water, the phosphor is recovered and a preselected particle size
distribution is used for the preparation of an X-ray intensifying screen.
[0015] After firing in the conventional manner, flux and soluble reaction products are removed
by water leaching or some other suitable method. The resulting Li
3Ta
1-xNb
xO
4 (x=0 to approximately 0.7) crystallizes in a monoclinic C2/c space group or in a
P2/n space group as detailed in
Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 48, 420-430 (1983). The crystallographic forms are also detailed in
J. of Solid State Chemistry, 53, 277-278 (1984). At stoichiometric levels of niobium above approximately 0.7 the
structure is cubic with a space group symmetry of I23 and the properties of the phosphor
become less desirable for use in an x-ray intensifying screen.
[0016] The stoichiometric level of niobium directly impacts the emission maximum of the
phosphor. From a stoichiometric level of 0.0 to 0.6 the emission maximum, under x-ray
excitation, increases from approximately 410 nm to approximately 435 nm as illustrated
in Fig. 4. At niobium levels above approximately 0.7 the cubic structure is observed
and the emission, under x-ray excitation, increases with niobium level. The emission
is lower for the cubic structure than for the monoclinic structure.
[0017] There are a host of fluxes which can be used to prepare the phosphor described above.
These include the alkali metal salts, e.g., lithium, sodium and potassium, of sulfates,
phosphates, carbonates and metaborates. The halides are also known to be beneficial
when added to the flux in combination with sodium, lithium, potassium, calcium, strontium
and barium. Particularly suitable fluxes are described, for example, in U.S. Pat.
No. 4,250,365. The amount of flux is not limiting. Typically a flux is present in
the reaction mixture in 30% to 60% by weight, preferably 45% to 55% by weight, based
on the total weight of oxide (phosphor starting material). The optional flux and phosphor
precursors are intimately mixed by any of a number of means including ball milling,
shaking, or by the use of a flowing gaseous or liquid medium such as air, nitrogen,
water, fluorochlorinated hydrocarbons or other inert fluids as detailed in U.S. Pat.
No. 5,154,360. The mixture of phosphor starting materials, and optional flux can be
fired, e.g., for at least three hours, at elevated temperatures, e.g., from 750°C
to 1500°C, before washing to remove a majority of the flux and recovering the phosphor.
[0018] After firing, pulverizing and washing, the phosphor is mixed with a suitable binder
in the presence of a suitable solvent and coated on a support. All of these steps
are described in the U.S. Pat. No. 4,225,653 and all are well-known in the prior art.
A protective topcoat may also be applied over this phosphor coating, in fact it is
preferred.
[0019] The phosphor may be dispersed in any of the commonly known binders, e.g., polyvinyl
butyral or the acrylates or methacrylates, using a solvent, e.g., an alcohol, chlorinated
hydrocarbon, ketone or butyl acetate.Small amounts of fumed silica may be present
in the phosphor to enhance handling and make the phosphor easier to pour. After dispersing
in the binder, the phosphor is then cast on a conventional support, e.g., cardboard,
polyester film or thin metal sheets. A brightener may also be present within the phosphor
and various reflective materials may be present as an underlayer or within the support
itself to enhance the generation of light when the phosphor is struck by X-radiation.
TiO
2 dispersed in a binder and cast on the support is conventional as well as the use
of small particles of rutile TiO
2 directly in a film support. The phosphor is typically applied to the support in an
amount ranging from 15 to 110 mg/cm
2. All of these procedures are well-known in the art. Over the phosphor layer which
has been cast on the support, a conventional protective topcoat may be applied and,
in fact, is preferred. These topcoats are also well-known in the prior art and serve
to protect the rather expensive phosphor layer from stains and defects during the
handling thereof. A particularly suitable topcoat is achieved when a styrene/acrylonitrile
copolymer is coated supra to the phosphor layer and dried. Conventional supports,
binders, mixing and coating processes for the manufacture of typical X-ray intensifying
screens are, for example, described in U.S. Patent 4,387,141.
[0020] The screens of the present invention may be used in pairs in cooperation with double-side
coated medical X-ray silver halide photographic film elements, although it is contemplated
that single-side coated silver halide photographic film elements may be used for some
applications. If a pair of screens is used the coating weights of each screen may
be different, if required. Thus, an asymmetric pair of screens can be used to get
the best results. Medical X-ray evaluations represent the predominant commercial use
for X-ray intensifying screens of this invention. A dimensionally stable, polyethylene
terephthalate film support into which small amounts of rutile or anatase titanium
dioxide have been incorporated is the preferred support for the x-ray intensifying
screen of this invention.
[0021] In operation, the intensifying screen absorbs X-rays that impinge thereon and emits
energy having a wavelength that is readily captured by the photographic silver halide
X-ray film associated therewith. These screens are generally prepared according to
the methods of U. S. Pat. No. 4,225,653.
[0022] In the radiological process, it is conventional to employ a photosensitive silver
halide film element with the above described X-ray intensifying screens. In the practice
of this invention, the silver halide element will be comprised of silver halide grains.
These elements are also well-known in the prior art and the preparation of grains
are also known and taught therein. The grains are generally made into an emulsion
using a binder such as gelatin, and are sensitized with gold and sulfur, for example.
Other adjuvants such as antifoggants, wetting and coating aides, sensitizing dyes,
hardeners etc. may also be present if necessary. The emulsion may be double-side coated
on the support and a thin, hardened gelatin overcoat is usually applied over each
of the emulsion layers to provide protection thereto. If required, a small amount
of a sensitizing dye might advantageously be added. Additionally, it is also conventional
to add a sensitizing dye to tabular emulsions in order to increase their ability to
respond to light.
[0023] The silver halide emulsion may employ any of the conventional halides but preferred
are pure silver bromide or silver bromide with small amounts of iodide incorporated
therein (e.g. 98% Br and 2% I by weight for example). Any grain morphology is suitable
for demonstration of these teachings including, but not limited to, grains which are
formed by splash techniques and those formed by techniques involving spray techniques
(i.e. single and double jet procedures). Tabular grains are most preferred.
[0024] Tabular grain silver halide products are well-known in the prior art with exemplary
methods of manufacture described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,400,463;
4,399,205; 4,414,304;
4,434,226; 4,439,520;
4,722,886; and 4,801,522.
[0025] After the grains are made, it is usually preferable to disperse the grains with a
binder (e.g. gelatin or other well-known binders such as polyvinyl alcohol, phthalated
gelatins) .
[0026] In place of gelatin other natural or synthetic water-permeable organic colloid binding
agents can be used as a total or partial replacement thereof. Such agents include
water permeable or water-soluble polyvinyl alcohol and its derivatives, e.g., partially
hydrolyzed polyvinyl acetates, polyvinyl ethers, and acetals containing a large number
of extralinear -CH2HOH- groups; hydrolyzed interpolymers of vinyl acetate and unsaturated
addition polymerizable compounds such as maleic anhydride, acrylic and methacrylic
acid ethyl esters, and styrene. Suitable colloids of the last mentioned type are disclosed
in U.S. Patents 2,276,322, 2,276,323 and 2,347,811. The useful polyvinyl acetals include
polyvinyl acetalaldehyde acetal, polyvinyl butyraldehyde acetal and polyvinyl sodium
o-sulfobenzaldehyde acetal. Other useful colloid binding agents include the poly-N-vinyllactams
of U.S. Patent 2,495,918, the hydrophilic copolymers of N-acrylamido alkyl betaines
described in U.S. Patent 2,833,650 and hydrophilic cellulose ethers and esters. Phthalated
gelatins may also be used as well as binder adjuvants useful for increasing covering
power such as dextran or the modified, hydrolyzed gelatins of U.S. 3,778,278.
[0027] It is most preferable to chemically sensitize the grain with salts that are well
known in the art. The most common sensitizers are salts of gold or sulfur. Sulfur
sensitizers include those which contain labile sulfur, e.g. allyl isothiocyanate,
allyl diethyl thiourea, phenyl isothiocyanate and sodium thiosulfate for example.
Other non-optical sensitizers such as amines as taught by U.S. Patent 1,925,508 and
U.S. 3,026,203, and metal salts as taught by U.S. Patent 2,540,086 may also be used.
[0028] The emulsions can contain antifoggants, e.g. 6-nitrobenzimidazole, benzotriazole,
triazaindenes, etc., as well as the usual hardeners, i.e., chrome alum, formaldehyde,
dimethylol urea, mucochloric acid, and others as recited in
Research Disclosure, No. 308, December 1989, Item 30819. Other emulsion adjuvants that may be added comprise
matting agents, plasticizers, toners, optical brightening agents, surfactants, image
color modifiers, non-halation dyes, and covering power adjuvants among others.
[0029] Thermographic imaging emulsions comprising silver salts of carboxylic acids may also
be used with the screens of the present invention. Exemplary examples are provided
in U.S. Pat. No. 5,028,518.
[0030] The film support for the emulsion layers used in the process may be any suitable
transparent plastic. For example, the cellulosic supports, e.g. cellulose acetate,
cellulose triacetate and cellulose mixed esters may be used. Polymerized vinyl compounds,
e.g., copolymerized vinyl acetate and vinyl chloride, polystyrene, and polymerized
acrylates may also be mentioned. Preferred films include those formed from the polyesterification
product of a dicarboxylic acid and a dihydric alcohol made according to the teachings
of U.S. Patent 2,779,684 and the patents referred to in the specification thereof.
Other suitable supports are the polyethylene terephthalate/ isophthalates of GB-A-766,290
and CA-A-562,672 and those obtainable by condensing terephthalic acid and dimethyl
terephthalate with propylene glycol, diethylene glycol, tetramethylene glycol or cyclohexane
1,4-dimethanol (hexahydro-p-xylene alcohol). The films of U.S. Patent 3,052,543 may
also be used. The above polyester films are particularly suitable because of their
dimensional stability.
[0031] When polyethylene terephthalate is manufactured for use as a photographic support,
the polymer is cast as a film, the mixed polymer subbing composition of U.S. Patent
3,567,452 is applied and the structure is then biaxially stretched, followed by application
of a gelatin subbing layer. Alternatively, antistatic layers can be incorporated as
illustrated, for example, by U.S. Patents 4,916,011 ; 4,701,403 ; 4,891,308; 4,585,730;
and 4,225,665. Upon completion of stretching and application of subbing composition,
it is necessary to remove strain and tension in the base by a heat treatment comparable
to the annealing of glass.
[0032] The emulsions may be coated on the supports mentioned above as a single layer or
multi-layer element. For medical X-ray applications, for example, layers may be coated
on both sides of the support which conventionally contains a dye to impart a blue
tint thereto. Contiguous to the emulsion layers it is conventional, and preferable,
to apply a thin stratum of hardened gelatin supra to said emulsion to provide protection
thereto.
[0033] Medical X-ray film processing is well documented in the art as exemplified in U.
S. Patent 4,741,991. A medical X-ray film to be processed is typically developed to
convert latent image centers within the silver halide grain into elemental silver.
Unreacted silver halide is then removed by dissolving in a suitable fixer and the
film is washed and dried to provide a suitable image.
[0034] The speed in a photographic system is broadly defined as the exposure required to
obtain a predetermined density under standard processing conditions. For a medical
X-ray system the specific procedure is detailed in ANSI Standard, PH2.9, 1964. It
is widely accepted in the art to report a relative speed wherein the speed is determined
relative to PAR which is arbitrarily assigned a speed value of 100. PAR speed is determined
with a standard CaWO
4 screen with a 84 mm phosphor thickness in combination with a Du Pont Cronex® 4 film.
High Plus screens and Par screens utilize a CaWO
4 phosphor and are available from E. I. DuPont de Nemours, and Co. Relative speed for
a medical X-ray system is determined at a density of 1.0 above base plus fog density
by exposure modulation techniques as exemplified in SPSE HANDBOOK OF PHOTOGRAPHIC
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, Woodlief, Ed.; John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1973, pp. 798-800.
EXAMPLES
Phosphor/Screen Preparation
[0035] 7.9384 g of Ta
2O
5, 0.0240 g of Nb
2O
5, 4.0000 g of Li
2CO
3, and 5.98 g. of Li
2SO
4 were ground together in a mortar and transferred to a covered alumina crucible. The
sample was heated in air to 1000°C over a period of 1.75 hours and held at 1000°C
for 10 hours followed by furnace cooling. The mixture was then washed with water to
remove the flux and the resulting Li
3Ta
0.995Nb
0.005O
4 was dried and collected. The X-ray powder diffraction pattern of this compound shows
only the lines for the monoclinic (psuedo-tetragonal) structure. The phosphor was
incorporated into a screen using a polyvinyl butyral binder in accordance with the
teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 4,225,653. The speed was measured using Cronex®10T medical
X-ray film (available from E.I. DuPont de Nemours, and Co. of Wilmington, DE) exposed
at 70 kVp with a tungsten tube. The results are contained in Table 1.
TABLE 1
| Relative Speed of Inventive X-ray Intensifying Screen |
| Phosphor |
Coating Weight |
Speed∗ |
| Par |
- |
100 Comparative |
| High Plus |
- |
216 Comparative |
| Li3Ta0.995Nb0.005O4 |
48.4 mg/cm2 |
271 Inventive |
| Li3Ta0.995Nb0.005O4 |
36.9 mg/cm2 |
234 Inventive |
| Li3Ta0.995Nb0.005O4 |
28.2 mg/cm2 |
192 Inventive |
| ∗Speed is relative to Par which is arbitrarily defined as a speed of 100. |
Emission Changes as a Function of Niobium Level
[0036] A series of samples were prepared as detailed above with the level of niobium corresponding
to x values of 0.0, 0.002, 0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.10, 0.50*, 0.60*, 0.80*, 1.00*. The
emission maximum was obtained with a Hamamatsu R928 photo-multiplier tube. Figure
2 contains a plot wherein x = 0.0 to 0.6. In Fig. 2 "Sp" is speed relative to High
Plus which is arbitrarily defined as 1.0. Figure 3 contains a graph of speed relative
to High Plus arbitrarily defined as 1.0 (Sp) wherein x=0.5 to 1.0. In Figure 3 the
transition period between monoclinic and cubic structure is indicated by the void
between 0.6 and 0.8. This region has not been analyzed to determine the exact transition
composition. The corresponding emission maximum (EM) is shown in Figure 4 for x =
0.0 to 0.6.
*Comparative Examples