[0001] The present application relates to a network support system, and in particular to
a network support system for accessing, and displaying, information from a plurality
of databases.
[0002] All network operators, whether they are operators of a telecommunications network,
an electricity network, a gas network, a railway network, or any other type of network,
need to maintain records of their network. There are very many aspects of a network
that need to be recorded, for example the geographical location of nodes and routes
within the network, the nature of each route or node, the logical relationship between
these nodes and routes, the users of the network, and their physical and logical location.
This information of the different characteristics of the operators network are generally
held on separate databases, so that all information on a particular aspect of the
network is located on one database. For example for a telecommunications network,
all customer information may be held on one database, while all information regarding
the physical routing of ducts will be on another database, information regarding the
logical routing of transmission links of a specified bit rate e.g. 2Mbit/s will be
on a third database. These databases are valuable assets which in many cases are critical
to the business of the network operator, and which have been assembled over many years.
However their data structures and operations were designed to take full advantage
of the performance efficiencies of database technology which was current at the time
of their development, so that, in general these databases do not interwork. In some
cases, due to the differing nature of the information to be stored, this may necessarily
be the case, even if the databases are designed at the same time. The needs of the
network operator that these databases were designed to satisfy are subject to change
and additional requirements also arise, particularly from the demands of customers
for network services to be provided more flexibly to meet their specific requirements.
[0003] Telecommunications networks are particularly complex because of the ability to multiplex
many logical communications circuits onto one physical route. A modern digital telecommunications
network comprises many logical communications circuits which are multiplexed together
in accordance with a digital hierarchy. Thus a number of 64Kbit communications links
will be multiplexed together to form a 2Mbit/s link, which will be further multiplexed
to form an 8Mbit/s link, and then a 34Mbit/s link and so on to 565Mbit/s or beyond.
A single communications link from one customer at a first geographical location, to
a second customer at a second geographical location will thus be multiplexed up, probably
at a number of different nodes in the network, transmitted for a majority of its route
as part of a high bit rate communications link, and then demultiplexed, again at a
plurality of network nodes, and finally delivered as a single 64Kbit link to the second
customer's destination.
[0004] Thus a plurality of databases will need to be interrogated in order simply to determine
the logical routing of a single communications link, or circuit, from one geographical
location to another. If information on the physical routing of the circuit between
nodes in the network is required a further, at least one, database will need to be
interrogated. A particular requirement of customers from network operators, especially
telecommunications network operators, is that of diversity and separacy of the routes
of the network which supply them with the given network service. In a telecommunications
network, diversity means that any two circuits do not share a common physical route
over any part of their lengths, although they may share common network nodes. Separacy,
in a telecommunication network, means that any two circuits do not share a common
physical route, nor any common network nodes over the whole of their length. Many
customers of telecommunication operators, having private digital networks (sold in
the United Kingdom as "Kilostream" RTM and "Megastream" RTM), require separacy of
the circuits forming their private digital network. Clearly emergency and military
organisations desire separacy of their telecommunications networks to ensure that
disruption of a single physical network route does not isolate them from communication.
However, increasingly commercial organisations, such as banks and building societies,
require the security of separacy so that, for example, central computer resources
which need to be accessible at all times are not isolated. Telecommunications operators
thus need to be able to determine whether separacy exists in a particular customer's
private digital network, implement it if not in existence, and ensure its continued
existence. Furthermore, since guaranteed separacy is often offered at a premium to
customers by telecommunications operators, the operators need to clearly demonstrate
to customers that the separacy for which they are being charged actually exists. This
is a difficult task for the network manager of the telecommunications operator to
achieve. To establish all the characteristics of a single circuit of the customer's
digital private network, a plurality of databases, each with their distinct access,
interrogation, and data formats must be consulted. The information from each database
must be stored, for example, in writing, until all the necessary information from
the different databases has been accumulated. Even once the network manager has got
to this stage, the task of visualising the physical and logical connections of a customer's
network from the amassed information is considerable. Furthermore, although the network
manager of the telecommunications operator may be convinced of the separacy of the
customer's network, it further remains to persuade the customer that his network does
indeed have separacy, from the information amassed from the various of the telecommunications
operators databases.
[0005] According to the present invention there is provided a network support system for
accessing a plurality of databases, each storing information regarding a characteristic
of the network, the network support system comprising:-
user interface means having a graphical display device and means for accepting
requests for information from a user,
selection means for selecting the appropriate database(s) for each request for
information,
and a plurality of data acquisition means, each associated with one of the databases,
for receiving requests for information, interrogating the associated database, and
sending information to the user interface means,
wherein, in use, the user interface means combines information from a plurality
of databases in accordance to the characteristics of the network represented by the
information, and displays the combined information via the graphical display device.
[0006] The present invention thus provides a network support system which allows for improved
planning, management, or utilisation of a network. A network manager employing a network
support system according to the present invention can access information from a plurality
of databases via a single user interface. The provision of data acquisition means,
or integrators, associated with each of the databases, ensures that neither the network
manager nor the user interface need be concerned with the differing details of how
to acquire information from the various databases. Moreover since the information
gathered from the plurality of databases is combined by the user interface in accordance
to the characteristics of the network represented by the information, for example
in accordance to the circuit number for a private digital network circuit, and displayed
via the graphical display device, the network manager is able to visualise a number
of aspects of the network from a single display. For example information on the logical
path of a circuit may be displayed together with information on the physical routing
of the same circuit, even though this information is stored on different databases.
[0007] Preferably the graphical display device displays the combined information in a geographical
form, for example displaying a geographical map of the region of the country in which
the network is, which shows the geographical location of the nodes of the network,
and the physical and logical routes between these nodes. Such a display allows the
network manager rapidly and intuitively to assimilate complex information regarding
the network and to rapidly make decisions concerning the management, utilisation or
planning of the network. Furthermore such displays are easily understood by customers
of the network operator who may be shown examples of the diversity or separacy within
their private digital networks.
[0008] Although a copy of the information held by the plurality of databases may be maintained
by the network support system (for example to allow faster access to the information),
preferably a copy of information regarding the network is not maintained by the network
support system. This ensures that the information displayed via the network support
system is "live" i.e. it is as up-to-date as the information the network manager,
or other user of the network support system, would acquire if he accessed the database
directly. Thus, although in some applications, for example network planning, where
timescales are relatively long, there is no disadvantage in storing information from
the databases, the ability of the network support system to access live information
enables the system to be utilised in roles where it is essential that the latest information
available is utilised. For example when allocating bandwidth from within a high capacity
link, or bearer, to a customer the latest information concerning spare capacity on
a particular bearer is required, to avoid the risk of the required capacity no longer
being available.
[0009] In one embodiment of the present invention the selection means form a part of the
user interface means.
[0010] Alternatively the selection means may be distinct from the user interface means.
In this case the selection means may be located remote from the user interface, which
need hold no information concerning the location of information within each of the
databases. The user interface, having received a request from the network manager,
or other user, would then request information from the selection means, without needing
to specify the database which holds the relevant information. Furthermore this arrangement
means that if information is moved between the databases, only the selection means
needs to be updated to accommodate the new location of the information. The effect
of this, as seen by the user interface, is that of a single logical database which
is physically distributed across a plurality of databases.
[0011] Preferably the network support system is able to accept and display new information
entered into a database without needing a request, from the user of the network support
system, to display such information. In this way the network support system is able
to monitor aspects of the network, for example to ensure that once separacy between
two circuits within the network has been established, it is maintained.
[0012] Advantageously new information regarding the network may be input to a database via
the network support system. This enables the network manager not only to view information
regarding the network, but also to correct such information, or to add further information.
[0013] Preferably the network support system also comprises at least one processing means,
distinct from the user interface means, which receives requests from the user interface
means and information from the data acquisition means, and sends processed information
to the user interface means via a messaging protocol. The provision of separate processing
means prevents the user interface from becoming over burdened with specific processing
tasks, for example the calculation of the shortest network route between two geographical
locations. The network support system may comprise a plurality of user interface means,
and if provided with processing means, each of the user interfaces may access the
processing means which would preform a specialised processing function for the user
interface. This provides flexibility in the design of the network support system,
since processing means can be added to, or altered, without affecting the user interface
means.
[0014] Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only,
with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a network support system according to the present
invention,
Figure 2 is a schematic diagram showing the program flow during a particular operation
session of a network support system according to the present invention.
Figure 3 is a flow diagram for the operation of a network support system according
to the present invention,
Figures 4 to 8 show prints of screen displays from a network support system according
to the present invention.
[0015] With reference to Figure 1, the users terminal can be either a PC 1, an X terminal
2 or a UNIX workstation 3 (SUN IPC). Each terminal type 1, 2, 3 has a screen 12, for
displaying graphical images. The terminals 1, 2, 3 are connected to a UNIX machine
4 (SUN Sparc 10) via a TCP/IP LAN connection, and the UNIX machine 4 is connected
to a further UNIX machine 5 via either LAN or WAN connections 6. When the network
manager, or user, employs a UNIX workstation 3 as a terminal then a GUI (Graphical
User Interface) process 7 runs on that workstation. The GUI is an "X-Windows" GUI
conforming to the Motif style guide, with additional data representation provided
by "Data Views" from VI Corp. When a PC 1 is employed a GUI process 8 runs on the
UNIX machine 4 and the X protocol is employed to display the results of the GUI on
the user's PC 1 or X terminal 2. The data acquisition means of the network support
system is implemented via integrator processes 9, running on the UNIX machines 4 and
5. Each integrator process 9 is responsible for communicating with a single database
10, the database 10 can either be locally held on the UNIX machine 4, or located remote
from the UNIX machine. If the database 10 is located remotely the UNIX machine 4 communicates
with the database 10 via comms equipment 11, e.g. X25.
[0016] Integrator processors 9 communicate with the GUI process 8 is using the RPC (Remote
Procedure Call) messaging protocol. The version of RPC employed is from the "Tooltalk"
package which is produced, and sold, by SUN Microsystems. If access to an integrator
process 9 on UNIX machine 5 is required, connectivity is provided via a TCP/IP WAN
mechanism.
[0017] A typical session for the network support system would be as follows.The user invokes
the GUI process 7 or 8 by clicking on an on screen icon. This runs the GUI process
7 or 8 on either the users own workstation 3 or on the UNIX machine 4. The GUI process
7 or 8 checks its configuration files to see which integrator 9 is required for this
particular user. The GUI process 7 or 8 then sends out a start message to start the
various integrators 9 for this particular version of the support system. The integrators
9 in turn, when started, check that they have their connectivities to the database
10 that they are associated with, and reply back to the GUI 7 or 8 to inform it of
their success or failure in performing that operation. The GUI 7 or 8 then displays
whether the integrators 9 were successful or not in starting up.
[0018] The integrator processes 9 can use a variety of mechanisms to access information
from the databases 10 including SQL (Standard Query Language), screen scrapping or
by driving existing report mechanisms on the database 10. After the initialisation
of the GUI 7 or 8 and integrators 9 is complete, the user is then able to perform
various operations using the network support system. As the user requests certain
functions, the GUI 7 or 8 will determine whether connectivity is then needed to particular
integrated processes 9, may request a log-on, user id and password for a particular
database 10. Following successful completion of the log-on procedure the user is then
able to drive the necessary functions within the GUI 7 or 8 to access information
from the databases 10, manipulate that information, and also write information back
to the databases. When the user decides to terminate the network support system session,
the GUI 7 or 8 sends out messages to the various integrators 9 to tell them to shut
down. The GUI 7 or 8 itself then shuts down.
[0019] The design of the system is modular and generic, different users of the network support
system will use different combinations of integrators to gain the desired information,
and combine it in the desired way.
[0020] A typical example of the program flow for a session will now be described with reference
to Figures 2 and 3. The user starts the GUI 7 process, shown as step 1 in Figure 2.
The GUI then checks its configuration files shown as step 2 in Figure 2, to see which
integrators 9 are required. The configuration file is used to determine which integrators
9 are needed by this particular class of user. Different groups of users will use
different integrator processors 9 to give them a specific network support system session.
This permits the design of system to be very generic, allowing one single system to
be developed which is then simply configured at run time by either developers or users
alike.
[0021] In the present exemplified session the user requires access to a telecommunication
operator's digital hierarchy database 10, known as INS, and also to the private digital
circuit, "Kilostream" RTM, product database 10, known as GENETIC.
[0022] The INS database holds the physical routing information for all of the operator's
digital network, whereas the GENETIC database holds information relating to which
Kilostream configurations particular customers of the operator have. Once the GUI
7 has decided which integrator processes 9 are required it sends RPC messages via
the Tooltalk messaging protocol to instigate the necessary integrator processes 9.
[0023] The integrators 9 once successfully started, reply. The user is now able to perform
various functions from the GUI 7. When the user requests certain operations which
require access to particular databases 10 controlled by the integrators 9, the GUI
7, knowing which database 10 stores each type of information, will request user id
and passwords for the appropriate database(s) 10, so that the user can gain access
to those databases. This process is shown by steps 10 through to 18 of Figure 2. Assuming
the user has been successful in logging into the various databases via the integrator
processes 9, he is now able to continue and perform the operations he requires.
[0024] In step 19 the user enters a circuit designation into the GUI 7, and the GUI 7 determines
which database integrator 9 it needs to send a message to, in order to gain the information.
This involves communication between the GUI 7 process, and an integrator process 9.
The integrator process 9, will then interrogate its associated remote database 10,
and will return the relevant information for that particular circuit via an RPC message
to the GUI 7 process. The GUI 7 process will then graphically display the routing
of the circuit on the screen 12 of the terminal 1, 2, 3. This process is shown in
steps 20 through to 23 of Figure 2.
[0025] Whilst the user is interpreting this information, the GUI 7 predicts the further
information required by the user and requests other integrator processes 9 for information
about the physical routing of the circuit. In this example steps 24 through to 26,
of Figure 2 show the GUI 7 sending each section of the routing, which was returned
from the GENETIC integrator, to the INS integrator to find its physical attributes.
The INS integrator in turn responds with messages after interrogating the INS database.
Now when the user selects an option to see the physical routing of the circuit it
is displayed on the screen 12 by the GUI 7. Thus information from both GENETIC and
INS has now been combined into one single view of the circuit.
[0026] Figures 2 to 8 show prints of the screen display from the network support system.
Figure 4 is an example of the schematic display of information, while Figure 5 shows
the displayed information in textual form. Figure 6 shows the display of information
in geographical form. Figure 6 shows an outline map of the United Kingdom with all
the logical routes 13 of a particular customer's private digital network. This information
is all stored on the GENETIC database. Figure 7 shows a geographical display of part
of a customer's private digital network in the north of the United Kingdom. The logical
route 13 between two network nodes 14 and 15, is shown, and furthermore the physical
routing 16 between the same two nodes 14 and 15 is also shown. The information for
the physical routing has been acquired from the INS database. Figure 8 shows part
of a customer's private digital network, which, from the logical routes 19 and 20,
would seem to have separacy between the network nodes 17 and 18. However, when the
logical routing information from GENETIC, is combined with the physical routing information,
from INS, it can be seen that the two physical routings 21 and 22 between the network
nodes 17 and 18 actually share a common physical path between the network nodes 23
and 24. Thus the apparent separacy shown by the logical routing diagram does not in
fact exist. By combining the information from the physical routing database with that
from the logical routing database in a geographical form on a single display, the
network manager can quickly appreciate this problem and resolve it.
[0027] The exact format of information in different databases is not always consistent.
The network support system, therefore, must resolve these differences in order to
take information from one database and input it into another, to gain an overall integrated
result. The support system also has to deal with any data inconsistencies between
databases for whatever reason, e.g. the databases may be out of step, having being
updated at different times, or there maybe incorrect information in one of the databases.
It is not possible for the support system to deal with every conceivable data inconsistency,
therefore when a data inconsistency is detected, the system flags this to the user.
The users can then investigate this problem, and rectify any data inconsistencies
on the appropriate databases.
1. A network support system for accessing a plurality of databases, each storing information
regarding a characteristic of the network, the network support system comprising:-
user interface means having a graphical display device and means for accepting
requests for information from a user,
selection means for selecting the appropriate database(s) for each request for
information,
and a plurality of data acquisition means, each associated with one of the databases,
for receiving requests for information, interrogating the associated database, and
sending information to the user interface means,
wherein, in use, the user interface means combines information from a plurality
of databases in accordance to the characteristics of the network represented by the
information, and displays the combined information via the graphical display device.
2. A network support system as claimed in claim 1, wherein a copy of information regarding
the network is not maintained by the system.
3. A network support system as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the selection means
form a part of the user interface means.
4. A network support system as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the selection means
are distinct from the user interface means.
5. A network support system as claimed in any preceding claim wherein, in use, messages
are passed between the user interface means and the data acquisition means via a messaging
protocol.
6. A network support system as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein new information
is displayed via the graphical display device when it is created in one of the databases,
without a request for said new information.
7. A network support system as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein new information
regarding a characteristic of the network is input via the user interface means and
stored in one of the databases.
8. A network support system as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the system further
comprises at least one processing means, distinct from the user interface means, which
receives requests from the user interface means, and information from the data acquisition
means, and sends processed information to the user interface means via a messaging
protocol.
9. A network support system as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the graphical
display device displays the combined information in a geographical form.
10. A network support system as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the data acquisition
means emulates a dumb terminal in order to interrogate the associated database.
11. A network support system as claimed in any preceding claim, for use with a telecommunications
network.