[0001] This invention relates to eliminating audible perturbations in the force induced
on an elevator car door by a linear induction motor.
[0002] Typical elevator door operating mechanisms, such as that shown in commonly owned
U.S. Patent No. 4,305,481, employ a rotary motor which drives a complex lever mechanism.
In attempts to simplify, and thereby reduce the initial cost, installation, adjustment
and maintenance costs, the use of linear induction motors has been suggested as in
U.S. Patent No. 3,891,907 and in commonly owned EP-A-614844. The use or a linear induction
motor eliminates the need for any mechanical parts other than an electrically conductive
secondary, to which the door may be affixed, which will drive the door in the open
and closed direction in dependence upon currents applied to the windings of the linear
induction motor primary. Utilizing a digital computer for generating the variable
amplitude and phase motor current waveforms for driving a variable voltage, variable
frequency linear induction motor results in waveforms which are only approximations
of the pure sinusoidal waveforms that produce optimum linear induction motor performance.
Distortion in digitally-produced waveforms results in acoustic noise and increased
motor heating. In the art, it has been known to utilize advanced techniques to improve
the current drives by means of closed loop current control implemented through digital
signal processing. However, closed loop current control significantly increases the
complexity of the processing as well as the cost of the apparatus itself. Use of open
current loop control and pulse width modulation approximation of desired sinusoidal
drive signals both contribute to significant drive perturbations at frequencies which
are in the human audible range. The perturbations may be due to harmonics of the A.C.
drive frequencies (between 4 and 50 Hertz), and due to subharmonics of pulse width
modulation switching frequencies (tens of Kilohertz).
[0003] Objects of the invention include eliminating noise in an elevator car door drive
system which employs a linear induction motor.
[0004] According to the present invention, there is provided a linear induction motor elevator
car door drive system comprising:
a three phase variable voltage variable frequency linear induction drive motor
having a primary including three windings connected in wye configuration and having
a secondary connected with the elevator door so as to provide linear motion thereto;
a source of three phase drive signals with polarity alternating at a frequency
below 50 Hertz; and
a filter comprising three capacitors connected in delta configuration, the juncture
of each connected pair of capacitors being connected to the free end of one of said
windings, and three inductors, one end of each inductor being connected to the juncture
of a corresponding pair of said capacitors, the other end of each inductor being connected
to a corresponding phase of said source of three phase drive signals, the capacitance
of said capacitors being selected with respect to the inductance of the motor windings
to form a low pass filter having a break point selected to attenuate audible frequencies.
[0005] According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the break point of the low
pass filter is in the order of 140 Hertz.
[0006] The invention eliminates mechanical perturbations at harmonics of the frequency of
alternation of the drive signals as well as resulting from subharmonics of switching
frequencies utilized to provide the drive signals. By eliminating all input signals
which are in the audible range, a very quiet door operation is achieved.
[0007] Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more
apparent in the light of the following detailed description of preferred embodiments
thereof, given by way of example only, as illustrated in the accompanying drawing.
[0008] Fig. 1 is a simplified, partially broken away schematic diagram of an elevator door
operating system employing a linear induction motor, according to the invention.
[0009] Fig. 2 is a schematic illustration of the windings in the linear induction motor
of Fig. 1.
[0010] Fig. 3 is a waveform of the current relationship of the three windings in Fig. 2.
[0011] Fig. 4 is a simplified waveform illustration of normal force and linear force as
a function of frequency and amplitude of the current in the linear induction motor
of Fig. 1.
[0012] Fig. 5 is a series of waveforms on related time bases, illustrating pulse width modulation
within control cycles.
[0013] Figs. 6-9 are a logic flow diagram of a one millisecond interrupt routine utilized
within the computer of Fig. 1.
[0014] Fig. 10 is a logic flow diagram of a 64 microsecond interrupt routine utilized in
the computer of Fig. 1.
[0015] Fig. 11 is a logic flow diagram of a pulse width counter interrupt routine for winding
U, utilized in the computer of Fig. 1.
[0016] Fig. 12 is a schematic block diagram of the driver of Fig. 1, including a filter,
and its connections with the windings of the linear motor of Fig. 1.
[0017] Fig. 13 is a diagram of slip frequency required to provide intended force.
[0018] Fig. 14 is a simplified waveform illustrating boast in accordance with the present
invention.
[0019] Referring now to Fig. 1, an elevator door 17 is shown in solid lines in the closed
position and is shown in dotted lines in the open position. The door 17 is fastened
to a secondary 18 of a linear induction motor, the primary 19 of which is secured
to the elevator car. In the example of this invention, the linear induction motor
primary 19 has six windings (Fig. 2) 20-25 connected in pairs - 20, 21; 22, 23; 24,
25 - so as to form three windings U, V, W, each of which produces a north pole and
a south pole which are 180 electrical degrees apart, as shown by the winding U. The
windings are always driven in three phase relationship, with the windings having phases
120° apart from each other. At a given point in time, such as that illustrated in
Fig. 3, the winding U may have a relatively small negative current flowing therein
at the same time that the winding V may have nearly maximum current flowing therein
and the winding W may have an intermediate negative current flowing therein. There
could be multiple sets of six windings per set, as is known.
[0020] The secondary 18 generally comprises a conductive strip, within which secondary currents
are formed by a magnetic field, the conductive strip having a magnetic backing (which
may either move with the door or be stationary on the building, as may suit any implementation
of the invention), to conduct magnetic flux between the related poles of the linear
motor primary (such as the poles associated with windings 20 and 21). The secondary
18 may also have an optical encoder strip disposed thereon (not shown) which may be
read by a photodetector 28 which provides pulses over a line 29 to a computer 30.
The number of pulses provided on the line 29 over a fixed interval of time, which
is one millisecond in this embodiment, is indicative of the distance traveled in that
time, and therefore the velocity of the door, and the aggregation of which is indicative
of the current position of the door. As described with respect to Figs. 6-11, hereinafter,
the computer 30 utilizes this information to derive a force command which will achieve
a desired velocity vs. position motion profile for the door, and converts this to
signals for selectively turning positive and negative voltages on and off in a driver
31, which is described more fully hereinafter with respect to Fig. 12. The voltages
provided by the driver 31 will result in the desired currents as illustrated in Fig.
3.
[0021] As is known, a single sided linear induction motor cannot be provided with a linear
force (one which will move the secondary from the left to the right as shown in Fig.
1, and the reverse thereof) without an attendant normal force which can be two times
to five times greater than the linear force. The normal force just causes the primary
to act like any solenoid and attracts the magnetic material of the secondary toward
the primary. In the art, the linear force has typically been chosen to provide a desired
acceleration, by selecting the frequency and amplitude of alternating current in the
primary windings that will provide such a desired result. The relationship between
normal force and linear force is set forth in Fig. 4, very crudely, for illustrative
purposes, as a function of frequency and amplitude of the currents in the windings
of the primaries. The selection of frequency and amplitude that will provide the desired
linear force, from among a wide variety of combinations thereof which will do so,
is generally made to provide maximum electrical efficiency in the application in which
the linear induction motor is to be used.
[0022] Fig. 5 illustrates a typical sine wave of AC current which may be used to drive a
linear induction motor. As illustrated on the sine wave, it has long been known to
generate a sine wave synthetically with stair steps, the magnitude of which is the
average magnitude of a sine wave during the period of the step. Also illustrated is
prior art pulse width modulation (P.W.M.) in which a constant magnitude (equal to
the greatest magnitude of the sine wave, although not so illustrated in Fig. 5) is
pulsed into the winding for periods of time chosen to create an average magnitude
across the period of time (one millisecond herein) equal to the corresponding stair
step shown on the sine wave. In the embodiment herein, instead of pulse widths that
vary between 0 and 1 millisecond, pulse widths that vary between 0 and 64 microseconds
are utilized, the same pulse width being maintained throughout an entire one millisecond
period. Thus, to create the approximate sine wave at 11°, during the second one millisecond
period of a 50 millisecond, 20 Hertz driving current, 16 pulses of about 12 microseconds
each will be provided as shown in the middle of Fig. 5. Similarly, at 195°, 16 pulses
of negative voltage, each having a 16 microsecond duration will be applied to a winding.
Thus, the current in the windings is achieved in the present embodiment by applying
a fixed amplitude voltage (which is invariant throughout the life cycle of the apparatus
according to the invention) for periods of time in any one millisecond interval which
are a function of the desired current (and therefore force) times the sine of the
angle at the present point along a sinusoidal drive command function, which is 120°
separated among the three windings (as in Fig. 3). In the present embodiment, the
normal force may be utilized to offset a clockwise rotary torque which a rightward
force on the upper right corner of the door 17 will cause about the door's center
of gravity, when the door begins opening, by means of providing a proper vertical
force toward the linear induction motor primary 19 as a result of the normal force,
which is a counterclockwise torque about the center of gravity of the door. All of
this may be as is described in the aforementioned EP-A-614844.
[0023] Referring now to Fig. 6, every millisecond, a real time interrupt is provided to
reach a one millisecond interrupt routine through an entry point 34. A first test
35 determines if a ramp down flag has been set or not. This is a flag which is set
when the door has been fully opened or fully closed and defines a period of time in
which the remaining voltages are reduced in a slow downward ramp, so as to avoid dropping
the door, as described more fully with respect to Fig. 9, hereinafter. Whenever the
door has just been opened and whenever the door has just been closed, the flag 35
might be set, and therefore the result of the test 35 might be affirmative. But most
of the time, the flag will not be set and a negative result of test 35 will reach
a test 36 to determine if the door is fully closed or not. As contemplated in this
embodiment, the test 36 may be based upon the normal elevator door physical switch
which indicates complete door closure; however, door position or any other indicator
of the door being completely closed could be utilized, if desired. In a normal case,
the elevator may be somewhere else than at a landing, and the doors will be fully
closed. In such a case, an affirmative result of test 36 will reach a test 37 to see
if a door open command has been sent to the door controller by the elevator controller.
If the door is fully closed (test 36) and there is no command to open the door (test
37), the one millisecond interrupt routine of Fig. 6 ends, and the computer may revert
to other programming through a return point 38. Eventually, the elevator will approach
a landing and when it is within the landing zone, the door open command will be provided
to the door controller and the result of test 37 will be affirmative. This reaches
a pair of steps 38', 39 which set a door opening flag (utilized as described hereinafter)
and initiate a 1.5 second clock, which is used to determine when door operation should
be complete; in this embodiment, it is assumed that the door moves about 55 cm and
will be fully opened in about 1.4 seconds. Of course, this timing must be adjusted
in any case to suit the particular door operating system in which the present invention
is utilized. The 1.5 second clock may be initiated for a 2.5 second timeout during
door closure; it is thus referred to as a 2.5 second clock and as a 1.5/2.5 second
clock herein.
[0024] The actual processing to formulate the commands and apply voltages to the primary
19 begins with a step 42 in which the pulse count of an encoder counter, which is
advanced by the optical position sensor pulses on the line 29 (Fig. 1), is memorized
as a term called "count"; then that counter is reinitialized immediately thereafter
in a step 43, to begin a new, one-millisecond count. A step 44 calculates the average
door velocity over the last one-millisecond period of time, as a velocity constant
(KV) times the count. A step 45 determines the current position of the door by adding
an old position (the place where it was at the start of the prior one millisecond
period) to an appropriately adjusted indication of the difference in position obtained
during the present one millisecond period, which is a position constant (KP) times
the count. And then, the old position is updated to be equal to the new position in
a step 46, for use during the calculations in the next one millisecond period. A subroutine
49 generates a velocity command using a door opening constant (Ko), in a manner to
cause a velocity profile as a function of door position which is the same as that
in the aforementioned EP-A-614,844.
This profile is shown superscribed over the leading edge of the door in Fig. 1. In
the usual fashion, the velocity error is taken in a step 50 to be the difference between
the calculated velocity command and the present velocity (determined in step 44).
Then, a force command is generated as a proportional and integral function of the
velocity error in a subroutine 51, utilizing a proportional constant (Kp) and an integral
constant (Ki). The force command is processed through a low pass washout filter subroutine
52 in a well-known fashion, and the filtered result is multiplied in a step 53 by
an amplitude constant (Ka) to generate an amplitude factor indicative of current amplitude
required to achieve the desired linear force in accordance with whichever relationship
of amplitude and frequency has been chosen (Fig. 4) to accelerate the linear motor
in the desired velocity. This amplitude is converted, in a step 54, to a number indicating
a pulse width representing (as in Fig. 5) the desired current amplitude, by taking
a proportional fraction of the number 256 (of course other numbers could be used to
determine the resolution of processing, as desired).
[0025] As is known, the linear induction motor requires a magnetizing current in order to
establish fields to create secondary currents in the conductive secondary 18. This
is a fixed alternating current for each winding U, V, W of the primary 19. This current
is electrically in quadrature with the linear force current and the two are combined
as the square root of the sum of the squares in a subroutine 55. Since the magnetizing
current amplitude is fixed, and is the same in every performance of the one millisecond
interrupt routine, it can simply be a stored number, equivalent to the pulse width
magnitude number generated in the step 54, resulting in a pulse width related number
as the outflow from the subroutine 55, In accordance with the invention, the magnitude
of the magnetizing current may be approximately one-quarter of the magnetizing current
typically utilized in the prior art to achieve maximum electrical efficiency. In the
present embodiment, this may be expressed as a pulse width count of about 32. After
the subroutine 55 is completed, the program advances to a phase portion thereof, as
illustrated in Fig. 7, through a transfer point 56.
[0026] In Fig. 7, a first test 59 determines if the force-derived amplitude, as a generated
count in step 54 (Fig. 6), is equal to or greater than 8. As seen in Fig. 13, this
is the first break point of a straight line approximation of desired slip frequency
as a function of force, which may ideally be as shown by the dotted curve of Fig.
13. However, it has been determined that for elevator door opening, the straight line
approximation shown in solid line in Fig. 13 is adequate. This simply simplifies the
processing. However, a table look-up or square root formula calculation of an ideal
current (dotted curve) could be used if desired in any implementation of the present
invention. If the P.W.M. value is not equal to or greater than 8, the desired slip
frequency is simply the straight line slope of 4 Hertz per 8 counts, and is so generated
in a step 60. But if the count is greater than 8, an affirmative result of test 59
reaches a test 61 to determine if the count is equal to or greater than 128. If it
is, an affirmative result of test 61 reaches a step 62 to simply generate slip frequency
as 18 Hertz. But if the count is between 8 and 128, a negative result of test 161
reaches a step 63 in which the slip frequency is set equal to 4 Hertz plus the slope
times the P.W.M. minus 8 counts. This follows the solid line of Fig. 13.
[0027] The slip frequency so generated is the frequency of slip between the secondary and
the primary of the linear induction motor which is necessary in order to create the
attractive force that will move the secondary under the primary in the desired fashion,
as is known. Such a frequency created in the primary will not, once the door is moving,
be effective because of the door motion itself. In other words, the phase change required
to create force must be in addition to that which results from motion of the secondary
with respect to the primary. To accommodate this situation, a phase factor related
to the relative velocity between the secondary and the primary is generated in a step
67 as a velocity constant (Kv) times the velocity, ratioed to 60 electrical degrees
per unit of space between the windings, which in an exemplary embodiment may be on
the order of 16 millimeters. A slip frequency phase is generated from the relationship
of 360° per cycle, in a step 68. The tonal phase is then taken in a step 69 as the
sum of the phases generated in the steps 67 and 68. The actual phase which is to be
achieved during the present cycle is the summation of the phase previously achieved
along the sine wave of Fig. 5) together with the current total phase requirement,
which is established in a step 70. And then the present phase of step 70 is saved
for the next one-millisecond interrupt processing cycle in a step 71.
[0028] As described with respect to Fig. 3 hereinbefore, the phases for the three windings
are related in the same fashion in each instance. The phase generated in step 70 is
taken in a step 73 to be the phase of winding U (arbitrarily); any other relationship
could be used if desired. Then a test 74 determines if the force on the door should
be positive or negative (opening or closing) as a function of the sign of the amplitude
of step 53. If the door is opening, so the amplitude is positive (in the convention
herein), then the phases of windings V and W are established in steps 75 and 76 as
being 120° and 240° advanced, in the convention of the present embodiment. On the
other hand, if the door is closing and the force is negative, a negative result of
test 74 will cause windings V and W to be -120° and -240° retarded from phase U, respectively.
And then a portion of the 1 millisecond interrupt routine which relates to winding
U, in Fig. 8, is reached through a transfer point 79.
[0029] In Fig. 8, the phase of winding U is normalized to be between 0 and 359° by virtue
of a test 84 and a step 85. Then a pulse width for winding U is established in a step
86 as the AC amplitude of step 55 (which is expressed as a pulse width count) times
the sine of the phase for winding U (as described hereinbefore with respect to Fig.
4), (in a step 86).
[0030] In Fig. 14, the AC driving current for winding U is shown in a solid curve. According
to the invention, it has been learned that, for whatever reason (possibly related
to adjacent pole fields and magnetic hysteresis), a crossover from positive to negative
halves of the sine wave of a driving voltage, as well as from negative to positive
halves of the sine wave of a driving voltage, results in a current lag, unless it
is compensated for by closed-current-loop control. In the present embodiment, there
is no current feedback indicative of the actual current in the motor, and therefore
there can be no correction for the current lag which occurs at zero crossings. Therefore,
in accordance with the present invention, the current lags are essentially eliminated
by providing a voltage boost in the first few cycles immediately following each crossover
throughout the door opening operation and throughout the door closing operation. To
achieve this, the zero crossings are sensed, and a flag is set; for the next several
cycles, some fraction of the maximum amplitude is applied by adding equivalent counts
to the pulse width during those few cycles.
[0031] In Fig. 8, a test 87 determines if the zero crossing flag has been set or not. Except
in the few cycles following a crossover, the flag will not have been set so a negative
result reaches a test 88 to determine if the trigonometric sine of the phase for winding
U is a positive or negative number. If it is a positive number, an affirmative result
of test 88 reaches a test 89 to determine if the phase of the U winding had a positive
sine in a next prior one-millisecond cycle. If it did, that means that there has not
been a zero crossover, so a number of steps are bypassed. But if the prior cycle had
a negative sine, which would be true at the point 90 of Fig. 14, then there is a negative
result of test 89 which will reach a step 91 to set the zero crossing flag, a step
92 to set a U counter equal to zero (for counting the few cycles that the boost signal
is applied), and a step 93 where the sine of the phase for the U winding is remembered
for use in the next cycle (sine phase U old).
[0032] Then the boost number for winding U is generated in a step 98 as a fraction raised
to an exponent times some count, KB, which may be a significant fraction of a typical
maximum amplitude, such as a count of between 60 and 90, or perhaps a count of 75
in the present embodiment. The fraction is the number of cycles that boost is to be
applied, which is five in this embodiment, although the number may vary from four
to eight or so, minus the setting of the U counter (initialized at zero in the step
92). The exponent (kb) may be one, or it may be some other number between 1/2 and
2, as is deemed appropriate in any implementation of the present invention. What is
necessary is to devise the parameters for the step 98 in such a fashion so that the
current in the windings will in fact be very close to sinusoidal. Once the boost factor
is generated in the step 98, the value of the U counter is incremented in a step 99.
Then a test 100 determines if the U counter has been advanced to a setting of 6, or
not. In the first cycle after a zero crossing, it will not be set to 6, and a negative
result of test 100 will reach a step 101 in which the pulse width value for the U
winding (established in step 86) has added thereto the value of boost calculated in
the step 98. As seen in Fig. 14, during the first millisecond after a zero crossing,
the boost value will be the full value of KB e.g., a count of 75, unless the exponent
(Kb) is less than one. In the second millisecond cycle following the crossover, the
fraction of step 98 will be 4/5; in the third cycle 3/5, and so forth until in the
fifth cycle, the fraction is 0. Then the U counter is incremented in step 99 to 6,
so an affirmative result of test 100 will reach a step 102 where the zero crossing
flag is reset This allows the program to again be looking for zero crossings in the
tests 88-90, as described hereinbefore. Then a subroutine 103 for winding V, and a
subroutine 104 for winding W, each of which is the same as the steps and tests 84-102
described with respect to winding U, are performed. When this is complete, a ramp
down portion of the one millisecond interrupt routine is reached in Fig. 9 through
a transfer point 105.
[0033] In Fig. 9, a first test 107 determines if a door closed flag has been set or not.
This flag is only set when the door has just been closed. Assuming that the flag is
not set, a negative result of test 107 reaches a test 108 to see if the 1.5/2.5 second
clock has timed out or not. In the general case, as the door is opening, it will not
have timed out, so the end of the one millisecond interrupt routine is reached and
other programming is reverted to through a return point 110. Although the door has
been opened or whenever the door has been closed, 1 1/2 seconds after initiation after
the opening or the closing cycle (Fig. 6) the 1.5/2.5 second clock will time out and
an affirmative result of test 109 will reach a step 111 which set the ramp down flag
and a series of steps 112-114 in which the pulse width values for windings U, V and
W are decremented by one count. The ramp down flag is used in page 6 to determine
that the bulk of the one millisecond interrupt routine should be bypassed, as described
hereinbefore. After decrementing, each of the pulse width values are tested to see
if they are reduced to zero in a series of steps 115-117. If any of the values is
non-zero, a negative result will cause the return point 110 to be reached.
[0034] In the next following one millisecond interrupt, the routine will be entered at entry
point 34 of Fig. 6. Because the ramp down flag has been set in step 111 as a result
of the 1.5 second time out, an affirmative result of test 35 will reach the transfer
point 105 in Fig. 6 so that the ramp down portion of the one millisecond interrupt
routine in Fig. 9 is reached directly. Since the 1.5/2.5 second clock will always
be in a time out condition except when it is counting through a door moving period,
test 109 will continue to be affirmative reaching the steps 111-114 where the ramp
down flag is redundantly set (without any harm) and the pulse widths are once again
decremented. Again the tests 115-117 determine if all of the pulse widths have been
reduced to zero or not. Initially, they may not thereby reaching the return point
110.
[0035] In a subsequent one millisecond interval, the one millisecond interrupt routine is
again reached in Fig. 6 through the entry point 34, and an affirmative result of the
test 35 will again jump the program to the ramp down transfer point 105 and again
reach the test 109.
[0036] No matter what the values may have in them at the end of 1.5 seconds, they will certainly
be reduced to zero within 256 milliseconds because the maximum count used in this
embodiment is always less than 256. At some point in time (generally within a few
cycles after the 1.5 second timeout), all of the pulse width values will be reduced
to zero so a series of affirmative results of the tests 114-116 will reach a test
120 which determines if the door is opening or not by testing the door opening flag
set in step 38. If the door has been opening, the flag is set and an affirmative result
of test 120 reaches a step 121 to reset the door opening flag and a step 122 to set
a door open flag. The door open flag indicates that the door is open and will remain
so until a door close command is received from the elevator controller, as described
more fully hereinafter. Because there is no longer any need to ramp down the counts
in the steps 112-114, a step 123 will reset the ramp down flag, and a step 124 will
reset a door close flag (the purpose of which is described hereinafter), redundantly,
but with no harm. Then, the computer reverts to other programming through the return
point 110.
[0037] Once the ramp down flag is reset in the step 123, the next time that the one millisecond
interrupt occurs, a negative result of tests 35, 36 and 109 will reach a test 127
to see if the door open flag is set. Since it has been set in step 122, the routine
will look for a door close command in a test 128. While the door is open and passengers
are transferring in and out (for some period of time determined by the elevator controller
as well as the door open button within the elevator car), there will be no door close
command so a negative result of test 128 will cause other programming to be reverted
to through a return point 129.
[0038] Eventually, the elevator controller will command that the door be closed and the
next one millisecond interrupt will find an affirmative result of test 128 and thereby
reach a step 130 which will reset the door open flag and a step 131 which will initiate
the 2.5 second clock. This is the beginning of a door closing operation. The door
closing may take 2 plus seconds due to the requirement to limit the total inertia
of the door, when closing, for safety reasons, as is known. So long as the door is
closing, in each cycle a test 132 is reached to determine if a passenger has caused
a door reversal, by interrupting the light beam between the two doors, operating a
safety shoe, or the like. If a door reversal has occurred, the door closing operation
is aborted at whatever stage it may be in, and a door opening operation is initiated.
Regardless of where the door happens to be, whenever a reversal occurs, the signal
processing described hereinbefore with respect to Figs. 6-8 for a door opening operation
will be carried out. This poses no problem at all since the routine is a position
loop, and it will pick up the closing operation at the position in which the door
is in. There may be some large incremental phases, velocity error and the like, but
this will simply result in the processing quickly recovering into a proper door opening
routine.
[0039] If there is no door reversal, a negative result of test 132 will reach a series of
steps 135-139 which are the same as steps 42-46 except for the fact that the velocity
and the incremental position are negative (heading in the closing direction) A subroutine
140 generates a negative velocity command as a function of a closing constant (Kc)
and the difference between maximum position and current position, otherwise similar
to the subroutine 49. Then the steps and subroutines 50-55 are performed as before
to come up with the desired AC amplitude, expressed as a count representative of pulse
width.
[0040] In Fig. 7, the same steps and tests 59-73 are performed as in the door opening operation
described hereinbefore since these are not direction sensitive. Then the test 74 determines
that the amplitude of step 53 is not positive, and a negative result of test 74 reaches
the steps 77, 78 to generate the phase for windings V and W as being -120° and -240°
from the phase of winding U.
[0041] In Fig. 8, the steps and tests 84-102 and the subroutines 103 and 104 are the same
in the closing direction as described hereinbefore with respect to the opening direction.
In the first pass through Fig. 9, the door closed flag 107 will not be set since the
door is simply starting to close and has not become closed as yet. The 1.5/2.5 second
timeout will not have occurred so a negative result of test 108 causes other programming
to be reverted to through the return point 110.
[0042] In the next one millisecond period, the one millisecond interrupt program is reached
in Fig. 6 through the entry point 34. In this case, affirmative results of all of
the tests 35, 36, 109 and 127 will cause the test 132 to be reached to determine if
there is a reversal or not. Assuming there is no reversal, the one millisecond interrupt
routine will be performed as before. This will continue to occur until, finally, the
1.5/2.5 second clock times out, as indicated by an affirmative result of test 108
in Fig. 9. Then, the ramp down flag will be set in step 111 and the decrementing and
testing of the pulse width values for the three windings will occur in the steps 112-114
and tests 115-117. Some number of cycles after the 1.5/2.5 second clock has timed
out, the pulse widths will have been reduced to zero, so an affirmative result of
the tests 115-117 will reach the test 120. In this case, since the door is closing,
the door opening flag is not set and a negative result will reach a step 143 which
sets a door closed flag. This flag is used in this particular embodiment simply to
allow synchronism between the routine of Fig. 9 and a physical switch, common on all
elevators, which indicates that the door is fully closed. The setting of that switch
is determined in a test 144. In subsequent passes through the one millisecond interrupt
routine, the ramp down flag (Fig. 6) and door closed flag (test 107, Fig. 9) will
reach the test 144. If the physical switch has not yet been closed, a negative result
of test 143 will reach the return point 110. Eventually, the door fully closed switch
will be closed and an affirmative result of test 144 will reach the steps 123, 124
where the ramp down flag is reset and the door closed flag (set in step 143) is also
reset. Notice that the fact that the door closed flag is also reset at the end of
a door opening operation is irrelevant.
[0043] The one millisecond interrupt routine has generated two numbers for each of the windings
U, V and W. One of these numbers is the pulse width generated in step 86 and perhaps
augmented in step 101, of Fig. 8, and the other of these numbers is the phase, which
is normalized by steps and tests 84, 85 in Fig. 8. The phases are used in generating
the pulse widths, so all that remains to be used relative to phase is the sign of
the trigonometric sine of the phase, to determine if the motor winding is to be driven
with a positive or negative half cycle of the driving sine wave.
[0044] In Fig. 10, a 64 microsecond interrupt routine is reached through an entry point
145, and a series of steps 146-148 set respective counters of the U, V and W windings
to the pulse width generated in steps 86 and 101 for the respective winding. Then,
the sign of the trigonometric sine of the phase of the U winding is tested in a test
149. If the sign is positive, this means that a positive voltage should be applied
to the U winding, (20, 21, Fig. 2) of the primary 19 (Fig. 1) of the linear induction
motor. This is achieved by a step 150 which connects a source of fixed, positive voltage
(Fig. 12) on a line 152 through a suitable switch 153 to an input terminal 154 (related
to the U winding) of a filter 155. On the other hand, if test 149 determines that
the sign of the sine of the phase for the U winding is not positive, then a step 156
will be reached to cause application of a fixed, negative voltage from a source 157
through a switch 158 to the terminal 154. Similarly, tests and steps 161-166 in Fig.
10 will cause positive or negative voltage to be applied from the sources on lines
152, 157, respectively, to additional terminals 169, 170 of the filter 155, through
switches 171-174. In Fig. 10, when all counters have peen set and three switches turned
on, other programming is reverted to through a return point 175.
[0045] The filter 155 is interposed between the switches 153, 158, 171-174 and the windings
20-25 of the linear induction motor primary 19. The filter consists of three capacitors
177-179, connected, in delta configuration, across the free ends of pairs of windings
(U, V; V, W; W, U). Between each switch and the corresponding windings, at the juncture
of each pair of capacitors, a choke (inductor) 180-182 prevents the capacitors 177-179
from representing short circuits across the switches 153, 158, 171-174. The capacitance
of the capacitors is selected with respect to the inductance of each motor coil (20,
21, etc.) to provide a low pass filter which significantly attenuates frequencies
above about 140 Hertz, in this embodiment; this break point frequency is chosen since
frequencies below 140 Hertz are not audible to humans. The filter 155 filters out
harmonics of the basic door current frequency, which is shown in Fig. 5 as 20 Hertz,
but which may range between 0 and 24 Hertz in a normal application of the present
invention, or even be as high as 50 Hertz in some cases. The filter also filters out
perturbations at subharmonics of the switching frequencies (around 16 Kilohertz herein).
The break point could be higher or lower, usually within the range of 100 Hertz to
200 Hertz.
[0046] As illustrated in Fig. 5, each winding is given, within any one millisecond period,
a series of about 16 pulses, each having a pulse width indicative of the amplitude
of the sine wave applicable to the particular winding. The timing of these pulse widths
is achieved simply by the fact that the U, V and W counters, which are set to the
correct pulse width in steps 146-148 of Fig. 10, are decremented, and when they are
reduced to zero, each will cause a related interrupt, such as the U counter interrupt
for the U winding illustrated in Fig. 11. Whenever the pulse width is complete for
the U winding, the U counter will cause the related interrupt to be reached in Fig.
11 through an entry point 185, and all that happens is that a pair of steps 186, 187
will turn off the plus U switch 153 and the minus U switch 158 (regardless of which
one was on), and then cause other programming to be reverted to through a return point
188. Similar counter interrupt routines are provided (not shown) for the V winding
and the W winding.
[0047] The foregoing is a simplified description of physical arrangements and logical and
arithmetic functions which may be utilized to practice the present invention. The
logic flow diagrams should not be taken to be literal equivalents of computer software
to be used in implementing the invention, but rather as illustrative of one exemplary
embodiment which may be implemented with well-known programming techniques. The present
invention has been described with respect to particular exemplary numbers, times,
and values for the purposes of illustration, merely. Obviously, embodiments utilizing
other numbers, times and values may be implemented as desired to maximize the benefit
of use of the present invention in any particular embodiment thereof. In some instances,
table lookup may be utilized instead of calculations at several points in the routines
disclosed herein, all in an obvious fashion. The invention has been described as used
with a linear induction motor having vertical poles in the primary, and with a horizontal
secondary disposed beneath the primary. This invention is also useful with other types
of linear induction motors, such as one which has horizontal poles and a secondary
which is displaced horizontally from the primary.
[0048] Thus, although the invention has been shown and described with respect to exemplary
embodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that the
foregoing and various other changes, omissions and additions may be made therein and
thereto, without departing from the spirit and scope of the claims.