[0001] The present invention relates to a process for the conversion of a residual hydrocarbon
oil. More specifically, the present invention relates to a process for the conversion
of a residual hydrocarbon oil involving the hydrocracking of upgraded deasphalted
oil.
[0002] In general, residual hydrocarbon oils, such as those obtained in the distillation
of crude oils at atmospheric or reduced pressure, contain considerable amounts of
non-distillable compounds having a high molecular weight. Specific examples of such
compounds are asphaltenes and metal compounds, in particular vanadium and nickel compounds.
If such residual oils are applied as a feed for a catalytic process such as hydrocracking,
the metals are deposited on the catalyst particles. As a result of the increasing
concentration of in particular nickel and vanadium on the active sites of the catalyst
particles, a rapid deactivation of the catalyst occurs. In order to avoid a too rapid
deactivation of the catalyst it has therefore been proposed that the metals should
be removed from the feed before contacting this feed with the catalyst.
[0003] It is well known, e.g. from British patent specifications Nos. 1,438,645; 1,560,590
and 1,560,599, that removal of metals from a hydrocarbon oil feed can be achieved
by contacting this feed at elevated temperature and pressure in the presence of hydrogen
with a suitable demetallisation catalyst. Demetallisation catalysts are known. They
usually consist of oxidic carriers such as alumina, silica or silica-alumina, on which
one or more metals or metal compounds having hydrogenation activity are optionally
deposited. Metals from Groups VIB and VIII of the Periodic Table of Elements are widely
known to be suitable for this purpose. Examples of suitable demetallisation catalysts
are disclosed in inter alia U.S. Patents Nos. 3,891,541 and 3,876,523, British patent
specifications Nos. 1,438,645; 1,560,590 and 1,560,599, Dutch patent specification
No. 7901734, German patent specification No. 2638498 and British patent specifications
Nos. 1,548,722 and 1,522,629.
[0004] It is generally considered desirable to remove asphaltenes from a hydrocarbon oil
feed prior to hydrocracking. However, in that case the asphaltenes removed can no
longer contribute to the production of distillates in the hydrocracking treatment
and as a result the final yield of distillates is not optimal.
[0005] U.S. Patent No. 4,564,439 discloses a two-stage catalytic hydroconversion process,
wherein a heavy hydrocarbonaceous feedstock containing more than 100 parts per million
by weight (ppmw) of metallic contaminants is first hydrodemetallised and then hydrocracked.
Hydrodemetallisation is carried out by mixing the heavy hydrocarbonaceous feedstock,
which might be a deasphalted tar or oil, with up to 10% by weight based on feedstock
of solid particles which have sufficient catalytic activity to suppress the adverse
coke formation and which induce substantial demetallisation. The resulting slurry,
suitably in the form of a dispersion, is subsequently introduced into a first-stage
hydrothermal zone, wherein hydrogen is introduced as well. The reactant mixture is
heated and as a result, demetallisation as well as conversion of hydrocarbons having
a boiling point above 1000 °F (538 °C) into lower boiling hydrocarbons occurs. The
effluent is then, without substantial reduction of pressure, rapidly passed through
a cooling zone into a second-stage hydrocatalytic reaction zone, where hydrogenation
and cracking occurs.
[0006] A major disadvantage of the process according to U.S. Patent No. 4,564,439 is the
fact that the contaminated solid particles resulting from the first stage of the process
are passed into the hydrocatalytic reaction zone together with the demetallised feedstock.
This will usually cause a more rapid and highly unwanted decrease of the activity
of the hydrocracking catalyst. Moreover, in said U.S. patent a clear preference for
heavy hydrocarbonaceous feedstocks containing very high amounts of metallic contaminants
is expressed. Since a deasphalting treatment generally causes a substantial amount
of the metallic contaminants present in the feed as high-molecular weight complexes
to accumulate in the asphaltic bitumen fraction rather than in the deasphalted oil
fraction, the metals content of a deasphalted oil is usually lower than 100 ppmw.
[0007] It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a hydroconversion process
which does not have the disadvantages of the process described above. More specifically,
it is an object of the present invention to provide a hydroconversion process which
combines effectiveness, in terms of upgrading of residual hydrocarbon oils, process
integration aspects and distillate yield, with optimum catalyst life and catalyst
activity for the catalysts employed in hydrodemetallisation and hydrocracking treatments.
[0008] Accordingly, the present invention relates to a process for the conversion of a residual
hydrocarbon oil, preferably a vacuum hydrocarbon oil residue, comprising the following
steps:
(a) deasphalting the residual hydrocarbon oil producing an asphaltic fraction and
a deasphalted oil (DAO);
(b) passing the DAO through a bed of a hydrodemetallisation catalyst in the presence
of hydrogen under demetallising conditions, producing an upgraded DAO; and
(c) blending the upgraded DAO with one or more flashed distillate fractions and subjecting
the resulting blend stream to hydrocracking, producing one or more distillate fractions.
[0009] The residual hydrocarbon oil feed and the flashed distillate fraction(s) used in
step (c) may originate from different sources and may be supplied as separate feedstocks.
It is, however, preferred that said residual hydrocarbon oil and said flashed distillate
fraction(s) used in step (c) are both produced in a vacuum distillation step prior
to step (a). Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment of the present invention a hydrocarbon
oil, suitably an atmospheric residue, is converted via the subsequent steps of:
(a') subjecting the residual hydrocarbon oil to vacuum distillation, producing one
or more flashed distillate fractions and a residual hydrocarbon oil fraction;
(a) deasphalting the residual hydrocarbon oil fraction obtained in step (a') producing
an asphaltic fraction and a deasphalted oil (DAO);
(b) passing the DAO through a bed of a hydrodemetallisation catalyst in the presence
of hydrogen under demetallising conditions, producing an upgraded DAO; and
(c) blending the upgraded DAO with one or more of the flashed distillate fractions
produced in step (a') and subjecting the resulting blend stream to hydrocracking,
producing one or more distillate fractions.
[0010] Vacuum distillation can be carried out by any conventional technique known in the
art. Suitable techniques then, include high vacuum distillation using steam ejectors
and vacuum flash distillation.
[0011] The deasphalting of the heavy residual fraction obtained from the vacuum distillation
may be carried out in any conventional manner. A well known and suitable deasphalting
method is solvent deasphalting, wherein the hydrocarbon feed is treated counter-currently
with an extracting medium which is usually a light hydrocarbon solvent containing
paraffinic compounds. Commonly applied paraffinic compounds include C₃₋₈ paraffinic
hydrocarbons, such as propane, butane, isobutane, pentane, isopentane, hexane or mixtures
of two or more of these. For the purpose of the present invention, it is preferred
that C₃-C₅ paraffinic hydrocarbons, most preferably butane, pentane or a mixture thereof,
are used as the extracting solvent. In general, the extraction depth increases at
increasing number of carbon atoms of the extracting solvent. In this connection it
is noted that the higher the extraction depth, the larger the amount of hydrocarbons
being extracted from the hydrocarbon feed, the smaller and more viscous the asphaltene
fraction and the heavier the asphaltenes being present in said asphaltene fraction.
[0012] In the solvent deasphalting treatment a rotating disc contactor or a plate column
can be used with the hydrocarbon feed entering at the top and the extracting solvent
entering at the bottom. The lighter hydrocarbons which are present in the residual
hydrocarbon oil dissolve in the extracting solvent and are withdrawn at the top of
the apparatus. The asphaltenes which are insoluble in the extracting solvent are withdrawn
at the bottom of the apparatus. The conditions under which deasphalting takes place
are known in the art. Suitably, deasphalting is carried out at a total extracting
solvent to residual hydrocarbon oil ratio of 1.5 to 8 wt/wt, a pressure of from 1
to 50 bar and a temperature of from 160 to 230 °C.
[0013] Demetallisation of the DAO in accordance with step (b) of the process according to
the present invention, can be achieved by any well known demetallisation process wherein
the hydrocarbon feed to be demetallised is passed at elevated temperature and pressure
and in the presence of hydrogen in an upward, downward or radial direction, through
one or more vertically disposed reactors containing a fixed or moving bed of demetallisation
catalyst particles. Well known demetallisation operations are the bunker flow operation,
the fixed bed operation, the fixed bed swing operation and the movable bed operation.
[0014] As already described in the introductory part of this specification, suitable demetallisation
catalyst usually consist of oxidic carriers such as alumina, silica or silica-alumina,
on which one or more Group VIB or Group VIII metals or metal compounds may be deposited.
Such demetallisation catalysts are commercially available from many catalyst suppliers.
Particularly suitable demetallisation catalysts are those having as the active agent
one of the combinations nickel/molybdenum (NiMo) or cobalt/molybdenum (CoMo), optionally
promoted with phosphorus (P), on an alumina (Al₂O₃) carrier. Concrete examples of
particularly suitable catalysts are CoMo/Al₂O₃, CoMoP/Al₂O₃ and NiMo/Al₂O₃ and NiMoP/Al₂O₃
catalysts. It is well known that the type of catalysts described hereinbefore in practice
will also exhibit some upgrading activity in terms of hydrodenitrification and/or
hydrodesulphurization, removal of heavy hydrocarbons and conversion of hydrocarbons
having a boiling point above 520 °C into lower boiling components. For this reason
the DAO leaving the hydrodemetallisation zone is referred to as "upgraded DAO" instead
of demetallised DAO. Hydrodemetallisation is usually carried out at a hydrogen partial
pressure of 20-250 bar, a temperature of 300-470 °C, preferably 310-440 °C, and a
space velocity of 0.1-10 l.l⁻¹hr⁻¹, preferably 0.2 to 7 l.l⁻¹hr⁻¹.
[0015] The blending ratio of the upgraded DAO and the flashed distillate fractions is not
particularly critical and is mainly determined by factors such as hydrocracking catalyst
choice, viscosity specification of the hydrocracking equipment and desired product
distribution in the hydrocarbon effluent. Suitably, the weight ratio flashed distillates
to upgraded DAO is in the range of from 10/90 to 90/10, preferably 25/75 to 75/25
and even more preferably 40/60 to 70/30.
[0016] The hydrocracking performed in step (c) of the process according to the present invention
may be conducted in any way known in the art, provided that at least one of the catalysts
used in the hydrocracking zone is acidic. Generally, such process is carried out in
the presence of hydrogen and a suitable hydrocracking catalyst at elevated temperature
and pressure. Hydrocracking catalysts usually consist of one or more metals from nickel,
tungsten, cobalt and molybdenum in elemental, oxidic or sulphidic form on a suitable
carrier such as alumina, silica, silica-alumina or a zeolite. There are many commercially
available hydrocracking catalysts which can be suitably applied in the process of
the present invention. At least one of the catalysts used in the hydrocracking zone
must be acidic, i.e. must contain a silica-alumina and/or zeolitic component.
[0017] The hydrocracking process can be a single- or multiple-staged process. In the case
of a single-staged process, a stacked bed of a hydrodenitrification/first-stage hydrocracking
catalyst on top of a conversion catalyst can suitably be used. Particularly suitable
hydrodenitrification/first-stage hydrocracking catalysts are NiMo/Al₂O₃ and CoMo/Al₂O₃,
optionally promoted with phosphorus and/or fluor. Preferred conversion catalysts are
those based on NiW/zeolite or NiW/zeolite/silica-alumina. Common hydrocracking conditions
are an operating pressure of 80-250 bar, preferably 100-200 bar, and a temperature
of 300-500 °C, preferably 350-475 °C.
[0018] In order to achieve optimum demetallisation of the DAO in combination with optimum
distillate yield from hydrocracking it is preferred that the hydrodemetallisation
of the DAO in step (b) is carried out at a hydrogen partial pressure which is at most
30 bar and suitably less than 20 bar higher than the operating pressure of the hydrocracking
in step (c). Most suitably the hydrogen partial pressure in step (b) is from 0 to
about 10 bar higher than the operating pressure in step (c). In this connection it
is particularly preferred to apply a hydrogen partial pressure in the hydrodemetallisation
zone in the range of from 150 to 200 bar. Accordingly, the operation pressure in the
hydrocracking zone is suitably in the range of from 120 to about 200 bar, preferably
from 140 to 180 bar.
[0019] Beside the distillate fractions there can also be produced a heavy fraction in the
hydrocracking of step (c). This heavy fraction can suitably be recycled in order to
be subjected to hydrocracking and/or hydrodemetallisation once again. Alternatively,
said heavy fraction could also be suitably applied as a feed for a fluidised bed catalytic
cracking (FCC) unit or as a feedstock for lubricating oil manufacture. Of course,
a combination of these options is possible as well. In order to achieve an optimum
distillate yield, it is preferred that at least a part of the heavy fraction obtained
in step (c) is again subjected to hydrocracking.
[0020] The asphaltic fraction resulting from the solvent deasphalting treatment in step
(a) of the process according to the present invention, may be used in several ways.
It can for instance be combusted for cogeneration of power and steam. Alternatively,
it can be partially combusted for clean fuel gas production, cogeneration of power
and steam, hydrogen manufacture or hydrocarbon synthesis. Still another option is
application in bitumen, emulsion fuels or solid fuels by means of pelletizing. A preferred
option is to subject the asphaltic fraction resulting from the deasphalting treatment
in step (a) to partial combustion.
[0021] Figure 1 depicts a preferred embodiment of the process according to the present invention,
wherein the vacuum distillation step has been integrated.
[0022] Figure 2 depicts a further preferred embodiment of the process according to the present
invention.
[0023] Figure 3 shows how the process according to the present invention can be suitably
integrated in a complex hydrocracker refinery line-up.
[0024] In Figure 1 an atmospheric hydrocarbon oil residue (105) is passed into vacuum distillation
zone (101), where it is separated in one or more flashed distillate fractions (106)
and a vacuum residue fraction (107). At least a part of the flashed distillate fractions
(106) is routed to upgraded DAO stream (110). The vacuum residue fraction (107) is
deasphalted in deasphalting zone (102), resulting in an asphaltic fraction (109) and
a DAO (108) which is subsequently hydrodemetallised in hydrodemetallisation zone (103).
The upgraded DAO (110) is blended with at least a part of the flashed distillate fraction(s)
(106) and the resulting blendstream is then passed into hydrocracking zone (104),
thus producing one or more distillate fractions (111) and optionally a heavy fraction
(112).
[0025] Figure 2 is in fact an extension of Figure 1 in three aspects. Firstly, in that at
least a part of the heavy fraction (212) produced in hydrocracking zone (204) is recirculated
by routing it to upgraded DAO (210) and blending it therewith prior to being led into
hydrocracking zone (204). Secondly, part of the heavy fraction (212) routed to upgraded
DAO (210) is routed to DAO (208) and blended therewith in order to be subjected to
hydrodemetallisation in hydrodemetallisation zone (203) once again. This option is
indicated by a dotted line in figure 2. The third aspect, finally, is also indicated
with a dotted line and embodies the option of routing part of the flashed distillate
fractions (206) to DAO (208) and blending it therewith. The other reference numbers
used in Figure 2 correspond with those used in Figure 1 having the same last two numbers.
[0026] Figure 3 shows the line-up of a hydrocracker refinery. According to this figure a
crude oil (307) is passed into atmospheric distillation zone (301), where a first
separation into one or more distillate fractions (308) and a residual fraction or
"long residue" (309). This long residue (309) is further separated in vacuum distillation
zone (302) into one or more flashed distillate fractions (310), at least part of which
is blended with upgraded DAO (317), and a vacuum residue fraction or "short residue"
(311), which is deasphalted in deasphalting zone (303). Optionally, a part of the
flashed distillate fractions (310) is blended with DAO (312). The DAO (312) is passed
into hydrodemetallisation zone (304) and the upgraded DAO is led into hydrocracking
zone (305). The asphaltic fraction (313) resulting from the deasphalting treatment
is passed into gasification zone (306) where it is partially oxidised using oxygen,
supplied via stream (314), eventually producing clean fuel gas (315) and hydrogen
(316). This hydrogen can for instance be passed into hydrodemetallisation zone (304)
and/or hydrocracking zone (305) in order to increase the overall process efficiency.
Hydrocracking in hydrocracking zone (305) results in one or more distillate fractions
(318) and a heavy fraction (319), which is at least partially recirculated into hydrocracking
zone (305) via blending with upgraded DAO (317). Optionally, a part of the heavy fraction
(319) is blended with DAO (312).
[0027] The invention is further illustrated by the following example.
Example
[0028] A crude oil feed was subjected to conventional crude distillation; the long residue
produced was subjected to conventional vacuum flashing, producing a flashed distillate
(FD) and short residue (SR). The SR was subsequently subjected to solvent deasphalting
using butane as extracting solvent to produce a DAO at a yield of 70% by weight based
on SR.
[0029] The main properties of the SR, the DAO and the FD are listed in Table I.
[0030] The DAO and FD were coprocessed in an integrated hydro-demetallization/hydrocracking
(HDM/HCU) pilot plant for about 5000 hours. The DAO was upgraded in the HDM reactor
over a conventional NiMoP/alumina catalyst.
[0031] Upgraded DAO and FD were subsequently coprocessed in the HCU reactor over a catalyst
system including an acidic catalyst, producing hydrowax, gasoil, kerosene, naphtha
and gaseous products. Both HDM and HCU reactors were operated at the same pressure.
[0032] The operating conditions, the typical properties of the upgraded DAO, the product
analysis of the final product after hydrocracking and the properties of the middle
distillates produced are given in Tables II, III, IV and V, respectively.
TABLE III
| Typical properties of upgraded DAO |
| Density 70/4 |
0.90 |
| Viscosity, 100 °C (cSt) |
62 |
| C (% wt) |
86.7 |
| H (% wt) |
12.6 |
| S (% wt) |
0.26 |
| N (% wt) |
0.27 |
| Ni (mg/kg) |
0.5 |
| V (mg/kg) |
<0.5 |
| MCR content (% wt) |
3.0 |
[0033] From a comparison between Tables I and III it can be seen that Ni and V were effectively
removed in the HDM process, while the MCR and N content was also significantly reduced.
TABLE IV
| Product analysis after hydrocracking |
| Product fraction |
Yield (% wt on fresh feed) |
| H₂S+NH₃+H₂O |
1.94 |
| C₁-C₄ |
3.90 |
| C₅-90 °C |
4.51 |
| 90-130 °C |
6.10 |
| 130-150 °C |
5.28 |
| 150-180 °C |
6.21 |
| 180-210 °C |
6.69 |
| 210-250 °C |
8.69 |
| 250-300 °C |
10.81 |
| 300-500 °C |
11.60 |
| 350-370 °C |
5.65 |
| >370 °C |
30.81 |
TABLE V
| Typical properties of middle distillates produced |
| Product fraction |
S mg/kg |
N mg/kg |
d(20/4) |
Cetane number |
Smoke point mm. |
| 150-180 °C |
<10 |
1 |
0.79 |
|
25 |
| 180-210 °C |
<10 |
2 |
0.83 |
|
22 |
| 210-250 °C |
<10 |
<1 |
0.83 |
43 |
21 |
| 250-300 °C |
<10 |
1 |
0.85 |
48 |
|
| 300-340 °C |
<10 |
1 |
0.85 |
59 |
|
| 340-370 °C |
14 |
3 |
0.85 |
65 |
|
[0034] From Table V it can be seen that high quality middle distillates were produced. The
lighter middle distillate fractions (in kerosene range), useful as jet fuel, have
excellent smoke points, whilst the heavier middle distillate fractions (in gas oil
range), useful as e.g. diesel fuel, have very good cetane numbers. Furthermore, it
can be seen that all middle distillates have very low sulphur and nitrogen contents
which is very attractive from an environmental viewpoint.
1. Process for the conversion of a residual hydrocarbon oil, preferably a vacuum hydrocarbon
oil residue, comprising the following steps:
(a) deasphalting the residual hydrocarbon oil producing an asphaltic fraction and
a deasphalted oil (DAO);
(b) passing the DAO through a bed of a hydrodemetallisation catalyst in the presence
of hydrogen under demetallising conditions, producing an upgraded DAO; and
(c) blending the upgraded DAO with one or more flashed distillate fractions and subjecting
the resulting blend stream to hydrocracking, producing one or more distillate fractions.
2. Process according to claim 1, wherein the residual hydrocarbon oil and the flashed
distillate fraction(s) used in step (c) are produced in a vacuum distillation step
(a') prior to step (a).
3. Process according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the deasphalting in step (a) is carried
out by a solvent deasphalting treatment, using as the extracting solvent one or more
C₃-C₅ paraffinic hydrocarbons, preferably butane, pentane or a mixture thereof.
4. Process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein step (b) is carried
out at a hydrogen partial pressure which is at most 30 bar and preferably less than
20 bar higher than the operating pressure of the hydrocracking in step (c).
5. Process according to claim 4, wherein the hydrogen partial pressure in step (b) is
in the range of from 150 to 200 bar.
6. Process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein in step (c) also a heavy
fraction is produced, of which at least a part is again subjected to hydrocracking.
7. Process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the asphaltic fraction
resulting from the deasphalting treatment in step (a) is subjected to partial combustion.
8. Hydrocracker refinery wherein the process according to any one of claims 1 to 7 has
been integrated.