[0001] Machine dishwashing compositions comprising one or more nonionic surfactants long
have been known and are commercially available. For optimum results the detergent
composition should be capable of adequate soil removal when used under the varied
conditions commonly encountered by the consumer in a typical household machine dishwasher.
The operating conditions commonly encountered in household dishwashers used by the
public frequently encompass a range of diverse operating temperatures that often are
influenced by the temperature of the water currently being supplied by the household
hot-water heater for the diverse hot-water requirements of the home. At a time of
high demand for hot water within the household, the water temperature may be considerably
lower than when there is no competition for the finite supply of hot water. It further
is recognized that optimum soil removal commonly is achieved at higher water temperatures.
Additionally, it is recognized that certain types of soils, such as protein soil from
eggs and/or milk products, in conjunction with the detergent, can enhance the generation
of harmful quantities of foam within the dishwasher that serve to impede the removal
of soil from dishes by reducing the impact of a stream of water thrown by the spray
arm or impeller of the dishwasher.
[0002] Representative nonionic surfactants for use in machine dishwashing compositions are
disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,306,987; 4,411,810; and 4,438,014. Additionally, U.S.
Patent No. 4,272,394 discloses a surfactant composition comprising a blend of nonionic
surfactants.
[0003] Aqueous rinse-aid compositions for use in the home or in industrial/institutional
applications following the washing of kitchen utensils also long have been known and
are commercially available. Such compositions promote rapid draining after the washing
is complete and serve to yield easily dryable dishes through the modification of surface
tension so that the wash liquid readily flows away. The rinse-aid compositions offer
considerable savings in labor to restaurants and institutions where large quantities
of dishes and tableware are routinely washed and dried as expeditiously as possible
while fully utilizing the finite level of equipment and space that is available. In
the past, such rinse-aid compositions commonly have included a surfactant and a hydrotrope
(e.g., an anionic hydrotrope) in order to further increase the solubility of the surfactant
in water. The hydrotrope commonly adds appreciably to the cost of producing the desired
rinse-aid composition particularly when it is present in a large concentration. Rinsing
preferably is conducted with vigor in order to increase its effectiveness, and preferably
is conducted at elevated temperatures that will better facilitate the removal of remaining
traces of the liquid from the surfaces of hot tableware and dishes via volatilization.
Also, it is desired that the rinse-aid composition minimize the formation of visually
unattractive spots and/or film on the dishes and tableware. However, vigorous rinsing
conditions commonly lead to increased foaming which may promote objectionable spotting
and film formation. Also, some previously available rinse-aid compositions exhibit
stability problems upon storage particularly if heat such as is common in a kitchen
environment is encountered prior to use. This can lead to a lack of homogeneity and
erratic rinse results when the use of the resulting composition is attempted by kitchen
workers without due regard to instability that may have occurred in the rinse-aid
composition that is being provided for their use.
[0004] Representative nonionic surfactants for rinse-aid compositions are disclosed in U.S.
Patent Nos. 4,306,987; 4,411,810 and 4,438,014. Additionally, U.S. Patent No. 4,272,394
discloses a surfactant composition comprising a blend of nonionic surfactants.
[0005] Representative previously available rinse-aid compositions are disclosed in U.S.
Patent Nos. 3,082,172; 3,563,901; 4,443,270; and 4,678,596. See also, the article
by Jay G. Otten and Christine L. Nestor, entitled "Anionic Hydrotropes for Industrial
and Institutional Rinse Aids", JAOCS, Vol. 63, No. 8, Pages 1078 to 1081 (August 1986).
[0006] It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved aqueous machine dishwashing
composition that exhibits good soil removal properties and effective protein soil
defoaming over an expanded range of operating temperatures.
[0007] It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved aqueous machine dishwashing
composition that is suitable for use at a temperature of up to at least 140°F. in
the absence of deleterious foaming even in the presence of protein soil sometimes
encountered during the washing of household dishes.
[0008] It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved aqueous machine dishwashing
composition that in a preferred embodiment is free of an alkyl phosphate ester defoamer.
[0009] It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved aqueous rinse-aid
composition that is relatively stable upon storage and is suitable for use at a temperature
of up to at least 180°F.
[0010] It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved aqueous rinse-aid
composition that is suitable for use with vigorous application at a temperature of
up to at least 180°F. in the absence of excessive foaming.
[0011] It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved aqueous rinse-aid
composition wherein in a preferred embodiment the usage of a high concentration of
a hydrotrope is unnecessary.
[0012] It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved aqueous rinse-aid
composition that can be utilized in the absence of excessive spotting and film formation
on the tableware and dishes following rinsing.
[0013] These and other objects and advantages of the claimed invention will be apparent
to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description and appended claims.
[0014] It has been found that an improved composition for machine dishwashing and rinsing
comprises approximately 1 to 80 percent by weight based upon the total weight of the
composition of a blend of nonionic surfactants (i) and (ii), wherein (i) is an alcohol
alkoxylate surfactant having a molecular weight of approximately 500 to 2,000 and
the structural formula:

wherein R is an alkyl group of 6 to 18 carbon atoms, R¹ is a methyl group or an ethyl
group, x is at least 3, and y is at least 2, and (ii) is a block copolymer of ethylene
oxide and propylene oxide having a molecular weight of approximately 2,000 to 5,000
and the structural formula:

wherein a + c equals at least 20, and b is at least 20.
[0015] It has also been found that an improved machine dishwashing composition suitable
for use in water at a temperature of up to at least 140°F. in the absence of excessive
foaming even in the presence of protein soil consists essentially approximately 1
to 10 percent by weight based upon the total weight of the composition of a blend
of nonionic surfactants (i) and (ii), wherein (i) is an alcohol alkoxylate surfactant
having a molecular weight of approximately 300 to 2,000 and the structural formula:

wherein R is an alkyl group of 6 to 18 carbon atoms, R¹ is a methyl group or an ethyl
group, x is at least 3, and y is at least 2, and (ii) is a block copolymer of ethylene
oxide and propylene oxide having a molecular weight of approximately 2,000 to 5,000
and the structural formula:

wherein a + c equals at least 20, and b is at least 20; approximately 10 to 90 percent
by weight based upon the total weight of the composition of at least one builder detergent;
and approximately 0.5 to 50 percent by weight based upon the total weight of the composition
of at least one compound containing active chlorine or available oxygen.
[0016] All weight percentages expressed herein are based upon the total weight of nonaqueous
components present in the composition unless otherwise expressed.
[0017] It has also been found that an improved aqueous rinse-aid composition suitable for
use at a temperature of up to at least 180°F. in the absence of excessive foaming,
spotting and film formation consists essentially of approximately 0.75 to 5 percent
by weight of an anionic hydrotrope, and a blend of nonionic surfactants (i) and (ii)
in a concentration of approximately 10 to 80 percent by weight, wherein (i) is an
alcohol alkoxylate surfactant having a molecular weight of approximately 500 to 2,000
and the structural formula:

wherein R is an alkyl group of 6 to 18 carbon atoms, R¹ is a methyl group or an ethyl
group, x is at least 3, and y is at least 2, and (ii) is a block copolymer of ethylene
oxide and propylene oxide having a molecular weight of approximately 2,000 to 5,000
and the structural formula:

wherein a + c equals at least 20, and b is at least 20.
[0018] The first nonionic surfactant (i) is an alcohol alkoxylate having a molecular weight
of approximately 500 to 2,000 (preferably 1,200 to 1,600) and the structural formula
A:

wherein R is an alkyl group of 6 to 18 (preferably 8 to 10) carbon atoms, R¹ is a
methyl group or an ethyl group, x is at least 3 (e.g., 3 to 12), and y is at least
2 (e.g., 2 to 18).
[0019] The alkyl groups R of nonionic surfactant (i) can be branched- or straight-chained.
Representative examples of preferred alkyl groups include hexyl, octyl, decyl, dodecyl,
and mixtures of these.
[0020] The recurring oxyethylene units in nonionic surfactant (i) designated by x are derived
from ethylene oxide and impart hydrophilic moieties to the surfactant. The recurring
units y are derived from propylene oxide and/or butylene oxide and impart hydrophobic
moieties to the surfactant. In a preferred embodiment R¹ is methyl and the recurring
units y are derived exclusively from propylene oxide.
[0021] The nonionic surfactant (i) can be formed by known techniques wherein a monofunctional
initiator (e.g., a monohydric alcohol, such as octyl alcohol and/or decyl alcohol)
from which the R portion of the surfactant molecule is derived is first reacted with
ethylene oxide and subsequently with propylene oxide and/or butylene oxide. The recurring
units x and y commonly are selected so that the weight of the oxyethylene units x
constitutes approximately 25 to 45 percent by weight based upon the total weight of
nonionic surfactant (i). In a preferred embodiment the recurring units x and y are
selected so that the weight of the oxyethylene units x constitutes approximately 30
percent by weight based upon the total weight of nonionic surfactant (i).
[0022] Nonionic surfactant (i) preferably exhibits a cloud point of no more than approximately
20°C (e.g., approximately 10 to 20°C). Such cloud point conveniently can be determined
while observing a 1 weight percent aqueous solution of the surfactant in accordance
with conventional procedures.
[0023] The second nonionic surfactant (ii) is a block copolymer of ethylene oxide and propylene
oxide having a molecular weight of approximately 2,000 to 5,000 (preferably 3,000
to 4,000, most preferably approximately 3,200) and the structural formula B:

wherein the outermost blocks of the surfactant structure are derived from propylene
oxide and are hydrophobic in nature, and the central block is derived from ethylene
oxide and is hydrophilic in nature. In the structural formula a + c equals at least
20 (e.g., 20 to 40, and preferably 25 to 36), and b is at least 20 (e.g., 20 to 35,
and preferably 22 to 32). In the structural formula a and c individually commonly
are at least 10. In a particularly preferred embodiment a and c are substantially
equal. Also, in a preferred embodiment the units b derived from ethylene oxide of
the nonionic surfactant (ii) are present in a concentration of approximately 30 to
50 (e.g., 40) percent by weight based upon the total weight of nonionic surfactant
(ii).
[0024] The nonionic surfactant (ii) can be formed by conventional techniques, such as that
described in U.S. Patent No. 2,674,619. Ethylene oxide can be added to ethylene glycol
to provide a hydrophile of the desired molecular weight, and propylene oxide can next
be added to obtain hydrophobic blocks at each end of the nonionic surfactant molecule.
[0025] Nonionic surfactant (ii) preferably exhibits a cloud point of approximately 30 to
50°C. Such cloud point conveniently can be determined while observing a 1 weight percent
aqueous solution of the surfactant in accordance with conventional procedures.
[0026] The machine dishwashing composition of the present invention includes said blend
of the two specifically defined nonionic surfactants (i) and (ii) that through empirical
research has been found to yield surprisingly advantageous dishwashing results wherein
there is an absence of excessive foaming even at elevated use temperatures as discussed
in detail hereafter.
[0027] The machine dishwashing composition of the present invention commonly contains a
weight concentration of nonionic surfactant (i) to nonionic surfactant (ii) in the
blend of nonionic surfactants of approximately 2 to 5:1, preferably approximately
3 to 5:1, and most preferably approximately 4:1. During the marketing and shipment
of the surfactants, the surfactant blend conveniently can be provided as a concentrated
aqueous solution wherein the nonionic surfactants (i) and (ii) are provided in a combined
concentration of approximately 80 percent or more by weight. In a further embodiment
the dishwashing composition conveniently can be marketed as a free-flowing granular
product that includes nonionic surfactants (i) and (ii). Alternatively, the surfactants
can be individually obtained and combined with the other ingredients of the dishwashing
composition when added to the machine dishwasher.
[0028] The dishwashing composition of the present invention commonly contains the blend
of nonionic surfactants (i) and (ii) in a combined concentration of approximately
1 to 10 percent by weight based upon the total weight of nonaqueous components, and
preferably surfactants (i) and (ii) are present in a combined concentration of approximately
1 to 6 percent by weight based upon the total weight of nonaqueous components. When
a phosphate builder detergent is present in the composition, a combined concentration
of nonionic surfactants (i) and (ii) of approximately 1 to 3 percent by weight based
upon the total weight of the non-aqueous components commonly is utilized. When no
phosphate builder detergent or a phosphate builder detergent is utilized in a low
concentration, a combined concentration of nonionic surfactants (i) and (ii) of approximately
3 to 6 percent by weight based upon the total weight of the nonaqueous components
commonly is utilized.
[0029] The machine dishwashing composition of the present invention contains approximately
10 to 90 (e.g., 40 to 85) percent by weight of at least one builder detergent that
increases the effectiveness of the composition by acting as a softener, sequestering,
and/or buffering agent. Commonly one utilizes a combination of builder detergents,
such as those commonly employed in the prior art. Representative builder detergents
include phosphates, silicates, polyacrylic acid, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,
zeolites, starch derivatives, etc. Further examples of possible builder detergents
for use in the machine dishwashing composition of the present invention include tetrasodium
pyrophosphate, sodium tripolyphosphate, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, mixtures
of di- and trisodium orthophosphate, sodium metasilicate, sodium sequisilicate, borax,
sodium borate, organic sequestering agents such as ethylenediamine tetraacetates,
water-soluble salts of citric acid, tetrasodium ethylene diamine tetraacetate, nitriloacetic
acid, etc.
[0030] Additionally, the machine dishwashing composition of the present invention contains
approximately 0.5 to 50 (e.g., 1 to 5) percent by weight of at least one compound
containing active chlorine or available oxygen. Such compound imparts germicidal and
bleaching action to the composition. Representative active-chlorine containing compounds
include chlorinated trisodium phosphate, trichlorocyanuric acid, sodium trichloroisocyanurate,
the sodium salt of dichlorocyanuric acid, the potassium salt of dichlorocyanuric acid,
sodium hypochlorite, and 1,3-dichloro-5,5-dimethylhydantoin. The amount of active
chlorine or available oxygen provided by each compound will vary as will be apparent
to those skilled in the art and the concentration will be selected so as to provide
sufficient germicidal bleaching activity. For instance, much higher amounts of active
chlorine are provided by a given concentration of a salt of a chlorinated cyanuric
acid than by chlorinated trisodium phosphate. Representative compounds for the supply
of available oxygen include the conventional peroxygen bleaching compounds, such as
sodium perborate, sodium percarbonate, etc.
[0031] Other auxiliary components commonly utilized in dishwashing compositions may optionally
also be included in the aqueous machine dishwashing composition of the present invention
so long as such ingredients do not interfere with the surprising benefits made possible
by the blend of nonionic surfactants (i) and (ii) discussed herein. Such optional
additional ingredients include fillers (e.g., sodium sulfate), colorants, fragrance-release
agents, etc. In a preferred embodiment, a phosphate ester defoamer is absent in the
dishwashing composition of the present invention.
[0032] The machine dishwasher composition of the present invention commonly is contacted
with food-soiled utensils during use when present in an aqueous solution in a concentration
of about 0. 1 to about 1.5 (e.g., 0.2 to 1) percent by weight at an elevated water
temperature.
[0033] The dishwashing composition of the present invention provides the user with good
cleaning ability for soiled dishes over a broad range of operating conditions up to
at least 140°F. For instance, satisfactory soil removal commonly is achieved at temperatures
ranging from 80°F. up to at least 140°F. Even if protein-containing soil, such as
that derived from eggs and/or milk products is encountered in the dishwasher, excessive
foaming does not occur when utilizing the improved machine dishwashing composition
of the present invention. Accordingly, excessive quantities of foam surprisingly are
not generated even at elevated temperatures. If such excessive quantities of foam
were present, they would inhibit the cleaning of dishes through the at least partial
blockage of the action of the surfactant-containing stream of water that is directed
by the dishwasher's spray arm or impeller to impact upon the exposed surfaces of the
dishes that are intended to be washed. Also, effective foam control is maintained
even at lower dishwashing temperatures. Additionally, no potentially harmful phosphate
ester defoamers need be utilized in the machine dishwashing composition of the present
invention.
[0034] The aqueous home or industrial/institutional rinse-aid composition of the present
invention constitutes an anionic hydrotrope and said blend of the two specifically
defined nonionic surfactants (i) and (ii) that through empirical research has been
found to yield surprisingly advantageous rinse results with the absence of excessive
foaming, spotting and film formation even at elevated use temperatures as discussed
in detail hereafter.
[0035] The aqueous rinse-aid composition of the present invention is capable of performing
well over a range of rinse temperatures including an elevated temperature of up to
at least 180°F. For instance, under appropriate circumstances rinse temperatures within
the range of approximately 90°F. to approximately 180°F. can be selected while utilizing
the improved rinse-aid composition of the present invention.
[0036] The anionic hydrotrope commonly is provided in the aqueous rinse-aid composition
of the present invention in a concentration of 0.5 to 5 percent by weight, and preferably
in a concentration only 1 to 3 (e.g., 2 to 3) percent by weight. Representative anionic
hydrotropes include alkylaryl sulfonates such as sodium xylene sulfonate, sodium dodecyl
benzene sulfonate, linear alkyl naphthalene sulfonate, cumene sulfonate, etc.; alkyl
sulfates such as sodium-2-ethylhexyl sulfate; dialkyl sulfosuccinates such as sodium
dihexyl sulfosuccinate; and phosphate esters. In a particularly preferred embodiment
the anionic hydrotrope is sodium dihexyl sulfosuccinate. Such particularly preferred
hydrotrope is commercially available as an 80 percent aqueous concentrate from Mona
Industries of Patterson, New Jersey under the designation of MONAWET® MM80 hydrotrope.
[0037] The aqueous rinse-aid composition of the present invention commonly contains a weight
concentration of nonionic surfactant (i) to nonionic surfactant (ii) in the blend
of nonionic surfactants of approximately 2 to 5:1, and preferably approximately 4:1.
During the marketing and shipment of the surfactants, the surfactant blend conveniently
can be provided as a concentrated aqueous solution wherein the nonionic surfactants
(i) and (ii) are provided in a combined concentration of approximately 80 percent
or more by weight. Alternatively, the hydrotrope and the surfactants can be individually
obtained and combined at the time of the preparation of the aqueous rinse-aid composition
that is intended for use by the user.
[0038] The aqueous rinse-aid composition that is introduced into a dishwasher at the conclusion
of the wash cycle commonly contains the blend of nonionic surfactants (i) and (ii)
in a combined concentration of approximately 10 to 80 percent by weight, and preferably
surfactants (i) and (ii) are present therein in a combined concentration of approximately
15 to 40 (e.g., 10 to 30) percent by weight. In a particularly preferred embodiment
surfactants (i) and (ii) are present in a combined concentration of approximately
20 percent by weight.
[0039] Other auxiliary components commonly utilized in rinse-aid compositions may also be
included in the aqueous rinse-aid composition of the present invention in a minor
total concentration up to about 10 percent by weight so long as such ingredients do
not interfere with the surprising benefits made possible by the hydrotrope and the
blend of nonionic surfactants (i) and (ii) as discussed herein. Such optional additional
ingredients include isopropanol, ethanol, propylene glycol, hexylene glycol, 1,4-butanediol,
urea, chelating agents, polyacrylic acids, colorants, fragrance-release agents, etc.
As indicated in the Examples, no auxiliary components need be present in improved
rinse-aid composition of the present invention.
[0040] The rinse-aid composition of the present invention provides the user with a generally
homogeneous and relatively stable composition even when exposed to elevated temperatures
and/or vigorous rinse conditions that commonly would lead to deleterious results when
utilizing many available rinse-aid compositions of the prior art. Such composition
of the present invention surprisingly may be utilized at a temperature of up to at
least 180°F. in the absence of excessive foaming, spotting and film formation. Kitchen
utensils accordingly undergo drying in an expeditious manner to produce an attractive
and acceptable product that is ready for future use with no or minimal handling by
staff members. Good results are achieved even in presence of protein soil from the
wash operation, such as that derived from egg and/or milk protein.
Examples for machine dishwashing compositions
[0041] The following Examples are presented as specific illustrations of the present invention.
It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the specific
details set forth in the Examples. In the Examples and in the Comparative Examples
dishes were washed in a standard Hobart UMP-4 commercial dishwasher while using various
nonionic surfactants (identified hereafter) individually and when blended in accordance
with the concept of the present invention. In some instances egg soil or milk soil
was added. In each instance, the nonionic surfactant or nonionic surfactant blend
was provided in a concentration of 3 percent by weight based upon the total weight
of the nonaqueous components of the dishwashing composition that was added to the
water which circulated in the dishwasher during the wash cycle. Conventional builder
salts in powder form were present in each instance (i.e., 44 percent by weight sodium
tripolyphosphate, 20 percent by weight sodium carbonate, 20 percent by weight of sodium
metasilicate), and a filler in powder form (i.e., 11.5 percent by weight sodium sulfate).
Additionally, 1.5 percent by weight of sodium trichloroisocyanurate was present in
each instance as an active chlorine-containing compound.
[0042] In each Example and Comparative Example the machine containing typical utensils (e.g.,
dishes, and flatware) was started and was allowed to fill partially with water, the
machine was stopped, 20 grams of the dishwashing composition were added, and the machine
was restarted and was allowed to fill completely. In some instances 15 grams of raw
egg soil or 12 grams of milk soil also were added. The water temperature was provided
at approximately 90°F. or at approximately 140°F. After the wash cycle was started,
the spray arm rotation rate was measured and is expressed hereafter as a percentage
relative to the rotation rate measured in water only. The foaming characteristics
of the dishwashing composition were measured in each instance through an observation
of the spray-arm rotation rate. Such spray-arm rotation rate was inversely proportional
to the quantity of foam generated in the dishwasher. Excess foam interferes with satisfactory
dishwashing.
Comparative Example 1
[0043] An alcohol alkoxylate nonionic surfactant was utilized having a molecular weight
of approximately 1,400 that corresponded to structural formula A previously presented
for a surfactant of this type wherein R was an alkyl group of 8 to 10 carbon atoms,
R¹ was a methyl group, "x" was approximately 10, and "y" was approximately 14. Such
surfactant exhibited a cloud point of 19°C. This composition was evaluated at 90°F.
and 140°F.
Comparative Example 2
[0044] Example 1 was repeated with the exception that an alcohol alkoxylate surfactant was
utilized having a molecular weight of 600 that corresponded to structural formula
A previously presented for a surfactant of this type wherein R was an alkyl group
of 10 to 14 carbon atoms, R¹ was an ethyl group, "x" was approximately 5, and "y"
was approximately 2. This composition was evaluated at 90°F. and 140°F.
Comparative Example 3
[0045] Example 1 was repeated with the exception that an alcohol alkoxylate surfactant was
utilized having a molecular weight of 1,800 that corresponded to structural formula
A previously presented for a surfactant of this type wherein R was an alkyl group
of 6 to 10 carbon atoms, R¹ was a methyl group, "x" was approximately 12, and "y"
was approximately 18. This composition was evaluated at 90°F. and 140°F.
Comparative Example 4
[0046] Example 1 was repeated with the exception that a block copolymer-nonionic surfactant
of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide having a molecular weight of approximately 3,000
was utilized that corresponded to structural formula B previously presented for a
surfactant of this type wherein a + c was approximately 31, and b was approximately
27. Such surfactant exhibited a cloud point of 40°C. This composition was evaluated
at 90°F.
Comparative Example 5
[0047] Example 1 was repeated with the exception that a block copolymer a nonionic surfactant
of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide having a molecular weight of approximately 3,200
was utilized that corresponded to structural formula B previously presented for a
surfactant of this type wherein a + c was approximately 33, and b was approximately
29. Such surfactant exhibited a cloud point of 40°C. This composition was evaluated
at 90°F.
Comparative Example 6
[0048] Example 1 was repeated with the exception that a block copolymer nonionic surfactant
of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide having a molecular weight of approximately 3,500
was utilized that corresponded to structural formula B previously presented for a
surfactant of this type wherein a + c was approximately 36, and b was approximately
32. Such surfactant exhibited a cloud point of 31°C. This composition was evaluated
at 90°F.
Example 7
[0049] Example 1 was repeated with the exception that the surfactant was a blend of alcohol
alkoxylate surfactant of Example 1 and the block copolymer nonionic surfactant of
ethylene oxide and propylene oxide of Example 4. The weight ratio of the nonionic
surfactant of Example 1 to that of Example 4 was 4:1.
Example 8
[0050] Example 1 was repeated with the exception that the surfactant was a blend of alcohol
alkoxylate surfactant of Example 1 and the block copolymer nonionic surfactant of
ethylene oxide and propylene oxide of Example 5. The weight ratio of the nonionic
surfactant of Example 1 to that of Example 5 was 4:1.
Example 9
[0051] Example 1 was repeated with the exception that the surfactant was a blend of alcohol
alkoxylate surfactant of Example 1 and the block copolymer nonionic surfactant of
ethylene oxide and propylene oxide of Example 6. The weight ratio of the nonionic
surfactant of Example 1 to that of Example 6 was 4:1.
Example 10
[0052] Example 1 was repeated with the exception that the surfactant was a blend of alcohol
alkoxylate surfactant of Example 2 and the block copolymer nonionic surfactant of
ethylene oxide and propylene oxide of Example 6. The weight ratio of the nonionic
surfactant of Example 2 to that of Example 6 was 4:1.
Example 11
[0053] Example 1 was repeated with the exception that the surfactant was a blend of alcohol
alkoxylate surfactant of Example 3 and the block copolymer nonionic surfactant of
ethylene oxide and propylene oxide of Example 6. The weight ratio of the nonionic
surfactant of Example 3 to that of Example 6 was 4:1.
[0054] The results observed in the foregoing Examples and Comparative Examples are reported
in Table 1 hereafter.
Table 1
Number |
Temperature °F. |
Spray Arm Efficiency (Percent) |
|
|
No Soil |
Milk Soil |
Egg Soil |
Comparative Example 1 |
90 |
98 |
91 |
78 |
140 |
99 |
95 |
79 |
Comparative Example 2 |
90 |
98 |
91 |
79 |
140 |
100 |
94 |
78 |
Comparative Example 3 |
90 |
96 |
89 |
76 |
140 |
98 |
94 |
79 |
Comparative Example 4 |
90 |
61 |
51 |
45 |
Comparative Example 5 |
90 |
66 |
46 |
35 |
Comparative Example 6 |
90 |
70 |
69 |
54 |
Example 7 |
90 |
96 |
90 |
77 |
140 |
96 |
96 |
90 |
Example 8 |
90 |
97 |
89 |
79 |
140 |
98 |
96 |
90 |
Example 9 |
90 |
97 |
90 |
90 |
140 |
100 |
97 |
92 |
Example 10 |
90 |
97 |
95 |
82 |
140 |
100 |
98 |
92 |
Example 11 |
90 |
94 |
89 |
87 |
140 |
98 |
99 |
93 |
[0055] It will be noted that the nonionic surfactant blends of the present invention surprisingly
exhibit improved properties. A spray arm efficiency of at least 70 is required for
satisfactory dishwashing efficiency with increasingly higher numbers demonstrating
increasing cleaning efficiency. It was found possible to include the surfactants of
Comparative Examples 4 to 6 that exhibited extremely low spray arm efficiency values
with the surfactants of Comparative Examples 1 to 3, and to surprisingly demonstrate
improved efficiency for the surfactant blends particularly when operating at a higher
temperature (e.g., 140°F.). Also, there was no significant efficiency loss and there
was sometimes even an efficiency improvement at a lower operating temperature (e.g.,
90°F.) An aqueous dishwashing composition is provided that efficiently can operate
over a wider range of temperatures with a high level of cleaning and defoaming ability
that provides the consumer better results even if somewhat erratic temperatures and/or
protein soil are encountered within the dishwasher.
[0056] Although the invention has been described with preferred embodiments, it is to be
understood that variations and modifications may be resorted to as will be apparent
to those skilled in the art. Such variations and modifications are to be considered
within the purview and scope of the claims appended hereto.
Examples for rinse-aid compositions
[0057] The following Examples are presented as specific illustrations of the present invention.
It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the specific
details set forth in the Examples.
[0058] In the Examples and in the Comparative Examples test glasses initially were washed
in a standard Hobart AM-11 commercial dishwasher while using a standard dishwashing
composition and standard washing conditions. A composition of the following components
was used to wash the dishes:
Table 2
Component |
Percent by Weight Prior to Mixing With Water in Dishwasher |
Sodium tripolyphosphate |
34 |
Sodium carbonate |
18 |
Sodium metasilicate |
25.5 |
Sodium hydroxide (beads) |
15 |
Sodium trichloroisocyanurate |
2.5 |
Water |
5 |
[0059] The above-identified components were provided in the commercial dishwasher during
the wash cycle in a concentration of approximately 0.23 percent by weight.
[0060] In each Example and in comparative Example 13 during the rinse cycle a rinse-aid
composition was added and was evaluated at a rinse temperature of 180°F. for foam
height, and for spotting and filming. The rinse water solution was mixed with the
subsequent wash cycle as is a common practice of industrial/institutional users. Also,
the cloud point for the rinse aid composition was obtained in each instance. The foam
height was determined by measuring the foam present inside the machine at the conclusion
of the wash and the rinse cycles.
[0061] The presence of spotting and filming was determined through careful observation on
a scale of 1 (no observable spots and/or film) to 5 (totally unacceptable spotting
and filming) by placing dried drinking glasses that had undergone rinsing (as described)
upside down in a black-lined box with a bright light source being directed from below
into the mouth of each glass. In accordance with this severe test procedure for observing
any spotting and filming, a value of 3 or below is considered to be acceptable for
all but the most demanding usages. For a typical industrial/institutional usage a
value of 3 or less is considered to be very satisfactory. Under ordinary use conditions
the appearance of objectionable spotting and/or filming would not be present.
[0062] The cloud point for each rinse-aid composition was determined by observing the composition
in accordance with standard test procedures.
[0063] The results observed are reported in Table 3 that follows the Examples and the Comparative
Examples.
Comparative Example 12
[0064] No rinse-aid composition was utilized and the test glasses were simply rinsed with
water provided at approximately 180°F. at the conclusion of the wash cycle and were
allowed to dry thereafter.
Comparative Example 13
[0065] A rinse-aid composition was evaluated that contained 20 percent by weight of alcohol
alkoxylate nonionic surfactant, 3 percent by weight of sodium dihexyl sulfosuccinate
hydrotrope, and 77 percent by weight of water. The alcohol alkoxylate nonionic surfactant
had a molecular weight of approximately 1,400 and corresponded to structural formula
A (previously presented) for a surfactant of this type wherein R was an alkyl group
of 8 to 10 carbon atoms, R¹ was a methyl group, x was approximately 10, and y was
approximately 14. Such surfactant exhibited a cloud point of 19°C. The sodium dihexylsulfosuccinate
hydrotrope was obtained from Mona Industries of Patterson, New Jersey as an 80 percent
aqueous solution under the designation of MONAWET® MM80 hydrotrope.
Example 14
[0066] Example 13 was repeated with the exception that a portion of the alcohol alkoxylate
nonionic surfactant was replaced by a block copolymer nonionic surfactant of ethylene
oxide and propylene oxide having a molecular weight of approximately 2,500 that corresponded
to structural formula B (previously presented) for a surfactant of this type wherein
a + b was approximately 26, and b was approximately 23. Such surfactant exhibited
a cloud point of 46°C. More specifically, the weight concentration of the alcohol
alkoxylate to the block copolymer in the rinse-aid composition was 4 : 1.
Example 15
[0067] Example 13 was repeated with the exception that a portion of the alcohol alkoxylate
nonionic surfactant was replaced by a block copolymer nonionic surfactant of ethylene
oxide and propylene oxide having a molecular weight of approximately 3,200 that corresponded
to structural formula B previously presented for a surfactant of this type wherein
a + c was approximately 33, and b was approximately 29. Such surfactant exhibited
a cloud point of 40°C. More specifically, the weight concentration of the alcohol
alkoxylate to the block copolymer in the rinse-aid composition was 4 : 1.
Table 3
Number |
Wash Foam Height (Inches) |
Rinse Foam Height (Inches) |
Spotting and Filming Value |
Cloud Point (°F.) |
Comparative Example 12 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
4.5 |
Not applicable |
Comparative Example 13 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
3.0 |
117 |
Example 14 |
0.5 |
<0.2 |
2.5 |
127 |
Example 15 |
0.5 |
<0.2 |
2.5 |
147 |
[0068] It will be noted that the rinse-aid composition of the present invention surprisingly
exhibits improved properties. The foam generation is insignificant thereby facilitating
washing and vigorous rinsing without encountering a foam problem, the spotting and
filming value is improved to a highly satisfactory level particularly for a composition
that may be used in industrial/institutional applications, and the cloud point is
increased thereby making possible a higher use temperature during rinsing. Such higher
temperature will expedite rapid draining during the rinse step and will promote more
rapid drying. Also, in view of the higher cloud point the composition of the present
invention is more stable even if elevated temperatures are encountered prior to usage.
[0069] Although the invention has been described with preferred embodiments, it is to be
understood that variations and modifications may be resorted to as will be apparent
to those skilled in the art. Such variations and modifications are to be considered
within the purview and scope of the claims appended hereto.
1. An improved composition for machine dishwashing and rinsing comprising approximately
1 to 80 percent by weight based upon the total weight of the composition of a blend
of nonionic surfactants (i) and (ii), wherein (i) is an alcohol alkoxylate surfactant
having a molecular weight of approximately 500 to 2,000 and the structural formula:

wherein R is an alkyl group of 6 to 18 carbon atoms, R¹ is a methyl group or an ethyl
group, x is at least 3, and y is at least 2, and (ii) is a block copolymer of ethylene
oxide and propylene oxide having a molecular weight of approximately 2,000 to 5,000
and the structural formula:

wherein a + c equals at least 20, and b is at least 20.
2. A improved composition according to Claim 1 wherein R of said nonionic surfactant
(i) is an alkyl group of 8 to 10 carbon atoms.
3. An improved composition according to Claim 1 wherein R¹ of said nonionic surfactant
(i) is a methyl group.
4. An improved composition according to Claim 1 wherein said nonionic surfactant (i)
has a molecular weight of approximately 1,200 to 1,600.
5. An improved composition according to Claim 1 wherein said nonionic surfactant (i)
exhibits a cloud point of no more than approximately 20°C.
6. An improved composition according to Claim 1 wherein x is 3 to 12, and y is 2 to 18
in said nonionic surfactant (i).
7. An improved composition according to Claim 1 wherein nonionic surfactant (ii) has
a molecular weight of approximately 3,000 to 4,000.
8. An improved composition according to Claim 1 wherein said nonionic surfactant (ii)
exhibits a cloud point of approximately 30 to 50°C.
9. An improved composition according to Claim 1 wherein a + c is approximately 33, and
b is approximately 29 in said nonionic surfactant (ii).
10. An improved composition according to Claim 1 wherein a and c of said nonionic surfactant
(ii) are substantially equal.
11. An improved composition according to Claim 1 wherein said units b derived from ethylene
oxide of said nonionic surfactant (ii) are present in a concentration of approximately
30 to 50 percent by weight based upon the total weight of said nonionic surfactant
(ii).
12. An improved composition according to Claim 1 wherein the weight concentration of nonionic
surfactant (i) to nonionic surfactant (ii) in said blend of nonionic surfactants ranges
from 2 to 5:1.
13. An improved machine dishwashing composition suitable for use in water at a temperature
of up to at least 140°F. in the absence of excessive foaming even in the presence
of protein soil consisting essentially of approximately 1 to 10 percent by weight
based upon the total weight of the composition of a blend of nonionic surfactants
(i) and (ii), wherein (i) is an alcohol alkoxylate surfactant having a molecular weight
of approximately 500 to 2,000 and the structural formula:

wherein R is an alkyl group of 6 to 18 carbon atoms, R¹ is a methyl group or an ethyl
group, x is at least 3, and y is at least 2, and (ii) is a block copolymer of ethylene
oxide and propylene oxide having a molecular weight of approximately 2,000 to 5,000
and the structural formula:

wherein a + c equals at least 20, and b is at least 20; approximately 10 to 90 percent
by weight based upon the total weight of the composition of at least one builder detergent;
and approximately 0.5 to 50 percent by weight based upon the total weight of the composition
of at least one compound containing active chlorine or available oxygen.
14. An improved dishwashing composition according to Claim 13 that is free of a phosphate
ester defoamer.
15. The process of washing food-soiled utensils in a machine dishwasher comprising contacting
said utensils with an aqueous solution containing a concentration of about 0.1 to
about 1.5 percent by weight of the composition of Claim 13 at a washing temperature
within the range of approximately 80°F. to approximately 140°F.
16. An improved aqueous rinse-aid composition suitable for use at a temperature of up
to at least 180°F. in the absence of excessive foaming, spotting and film formation
consisting essentially of approximately 0.75 to 5 percent by weight of an anionic
hydrotrope, and a blend of nonionic surfactants (i) and (ii) in a concentration of
approximately 10 to 80 percent by weight, wherein (i) is an alcohol alkoxylate surfactant
having a molecular weight of approximately 500 to 2,000 and the structural formula:

wherein R is an alkyl group of 6 to 18 carbon atoms, R¹ is a methyl group or an ethyl
group, x is at least 3, and y is at least 2, and (ii) is a block copolymer of ethylene
oxide and propylene oxide having a molecular weight of approximately 2,000 to 5,000
and the structural formula:

wherein a + c equals at least 20, and b is at least 20.
17. An improved rinse-aid composition according to Claim 16 that is suitable for use within
the range of approximately 90°F to approximately 180°F.
18. An improved rinse-aid composition according to Claim 16 wherein said anionic hydrotrope
is present in a concentration of approximately 1 to 3 percent by weight.
19. An improved rinse-said composition according to Claim 16 wherein said anionic hydrotrope
is selected form the group consisting of sodium xylene sulfonate, sodium dodecyl benzene
sulfonate, linear alkyl naphthalene sulfonate, cumene sulfonate, sodium 2-ethylhexyl
sulfate, sodium dihexyl sulfosuccinate, and phosphate esters.
20. An improved rinse-aid composition according to Claim 16 wherein said blend of nonionic
surfactants is present in a concentration of approximately 15 to 40 percent by weight.
21. The process of rinsing utensils in a machine dishwasher comprising contacting said
utensils following washing with the composition of Claim 16 while the temperature
of said composition is within the range of approximately 90°F. to approximately 180°F.